linux/drivers/net/dummy.c

249 lines
5.9 KiB

net: Fix inconsistent teardown and release of private netdev state. Network devices can allocate reasources and private memory using netdev_ops->ndo_init(). However, the release of these resources can occur in one of two different places. Either netdev_ops->ndo_uninit() or netdev->destructor(). The decision of which operation frees the resources depends upon whether it is necessary for all netdev refs to be released before it is safe to perform the freeing. netdev_ops->ndo_uninit() presumably can occur right after the NETDEV_UNREGISTER notifier completes and the unicast and multicast address lists are flushed. netdev->destructor(), on the other hand, does not run until the netdev references all go away. Further complicating the situation is that netdev->destructor() almost universally does also a free_netdev(). This creates a problem for the logic in register_netdevice(). Because all callers of register_netdevice() manage the freeing of the netdev, and invoke free_netdev(dev) if register_netdevice() fails. If netdev_ops->ndo_init() succeeds, but something else fails inside of register_netdevice(), it does call ndo_ops->ndo_uninit(). But it is not able to invoke netdev->destructor(). This is because netdev->destructor() will do a free_netdev() and then the caller of register_netdevice() will do the same. However, this means that the resources that would normally be released by netdev->destructor() will not be. Over the years drivers have added local hacks to deal with this, by invoking their destructor parts by hand when register_netdevice() fails. Many drivers do not try to deal with this, and instead we have leaks. Let's close this hole by formalizing the distinction between what private things need to be freed up by netdev->destructor() and whether the driver needs unregister_netdevice() to perform the free_netdev(). netdev->priv_destructor() performs all actions to free up the private resources that used to be freed by netdev->destructor(), except for free_netdev(). netdev->needs_free_netdev is a boolean that indicates whether free_netdev() should be done at the end of unregister_netdevice(). Now, register_netdevice() can sanely release all resources after ndo_ops->ndo_init() succeeds, by invoking both ndo_ops->ndo_uninit() and netdev->priv_destructor(). And at the end of unregister_netdevice(), we invoke netdev->priv_destructor() and optionally call free_netdev(). Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-05-08 12:52:56 -04:00
dummy: fix oops when loading the dummy failed We rename the dummy in modprobe.conf like this: install dummy0 /sbin/modprobe -o dummy0 --ignore-install dummy install dummy1 /sbin/modprobe -o dummy1 --ignore-install dummy We got oops when we run the command: modprobe dummy0 modprobe dummy1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3302.187584] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 [ 3302.195411] IP: [<ffffffff813fe62a>] __rtnl_link_unregister+0x9a/0xd0 [ 3302.201844] PGD 85c94a067 PUD 8517bd067 PMD 0 [ 3302.206305] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP [ 3302.299737] task: ffff88105ccea300 ti: ffff880eba4a0000 task.ti: ffff880eba4a0000 [ 3302.307186] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813fe62a>] [<ffffffff813fe62a>] __rtnl_link_unregister+0x9a/0xd0 [ 3302.316044] RSP: 0018:ffff880eba4a1dd8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 3302.321332] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff81a9d738 RCX: 0000000000000002 [ 3302.328436] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffa04d602c RDI: ffff880eba4a1dd8 [ 3302.335541] RBP: ffff880eba4a1e18 R08: dead000000200200 R09: dead000000100100 [ 3302.342644] R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffffffff81a9d788 [ 3302.349748] R13: ffffffffa04d7020 R14: ffffffff81a9d670 R15: ffff880eba4a1dd8 [ 3302.364910] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 3302.370630] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000085e15e000 CR4: 00000000000427e0 [ 3302.377734] DR0: 0000000000000003 DR1: 00000000000000b0 DR2: 0000000000000001 [ 3302.384838] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 3302.391940] Stack: [ 3302.393944] ffff880eba4a1dd8 ffff880eba4a1dd8 ffff880eba4a1e18 ffffffffa04d70c0 [ 3302.401350] 00000000ffffffef ffffffffa01a8000 0000000000000000 ffffffff816111c8 [ 3302.408758] ffff880eba4a1e48 ffffffffa01a80be ffff880eba4a1e48 ffffffffa04d70c0 [ 3302.416164] Call Trace: [ 3302.418605] [<ffffffffa01a8000>] ? 0xffffffffa01a7fff [ 3302.423727] [<ffffffffa01a80be>] dummy_init_module+0xbe/0x1000 [dummy0] [ 3302.430405] [<ffffffffa01a8000>] ? 0xffffffffa01a7fff [ 3302.435535] [<ffffffff81000322>] do_one_initcall+0x152/0x1b0 [ 3302.441263] [<ffffffff810ab24b>] do_init_module+0x7b/0x200 [ 3302.446824] [<ffffffff810ad3d2>] load_module+0x4e2/0x530 [ 3302.452215] [<ffffffff8127ae40>] ? ddebug_dyndbg_boot_param_cb+0x60/0x60 [ 3302.458979] [<ffffffff810ad5f1>] SyS_init_module+0xd1/0x130 [ 3302.464627] [<ffffffff814b9652>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 3302.490090] RIP [<ffffffff813fe62a>] __rtnl_link_unregister+0x9a/0xd0 [ 3302.496607] RSP <ffff880eba4a1dd8> [ 3302.500084] CR2: 0000000000000008 [ 3302.503466] ---[ end trace 8342d49cd49f78ed ]--- The reason is that when loading dummy, if __rtnl_link_register() return failed, the init_module should return and avoid take the wrong path. Signed-off-by: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-07-11 19:04:02 +08:00
dummy: fix oops when loading the dummy failed We rename the dummy in modprobe.conf like this: install dummy0 /sbin/modprobe -o dummy0 --ignore-install dummy install dummy1 /sbin/modprobe -o dummy1 --ignore-install dummy We got oops when we run the command: modprobe dummy0 modprobe dummy1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3302.187584] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 [ 3302.195411] IP: [<ffffffff813fe62a>] __rtnl_link_unregister+0x9a/0xd0 [ 3302.201844] PGD 85c94a067 PUD 8517bd067 PMD 0 [ 3302.206305] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP [ 3302.299737] task: ffff88105ccea300 ti: ffff880eba4a0000 task.ti: ffff880eba4a0000 [ 3302.307186] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813fe62a>] [<ffffffff813fe62a>] __rtnl_link_unregister+0x9a/0xd0 [ 3302.316044] RSP: 0018:ffff880eba4a1dd8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 3302.321332] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff81a9d738 RCX: 0000000000000002 [ 3302.328436] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffa04d602c RDI: ffff880eba4a1dd8 [ 3302.335541] RBP: ffff880eba4a1e18 R08: dead000000200200 R09: dead000000100100 [ 3302.342644] R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffffffff81a9d788 [ 3302.349748] R13: ffffffffa04d7020 R14: ffffffff81a9d670 R15: ffff880eba4a1dd8 [ 3302.364910] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 3302.370630] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000085e15e000 CR4: 00000000000427e0 [ 3302.377734] DR0: 0000000000000003 DR1: 00000000000000b0 DR2: 0000000000000001 [ 3302.384838] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 3302.391940] Stack: [ 3302.393944] ffff880eba4a1dd8 ffff880eba4a1dd8 ffff880eba4a1e18 ffffffffa04d70c0 [ 3302.401350] 00000000ffffffef ffffffffa01a8000 0000000000000000 ffffffff816111c8 [ 3302.408758] ffff880eba4a1e48 ffffffffa01a80be ffff880eba4a1e48 ffffffffa04d70c0 [ 3302.416164] Call Trace: [ 3302.418605] [<ffffffffa01a8000>] ? 0xffffffffa01a7fff [ 3302.423727] [<ffffffffa01a80be>] dummy_init_module+0xbe/0x1000 [dummy0] [ 3302.430405] [<ffffffffa01a8000>] ? 0xffffffffa01a7fff [ 3302.435535] [<ffffffff81000322>] do_one_initcall+0x152/0x1b0 [ 3302.441263] [<ffffffff810ab24b>] do_init_module+0x7b/0x200 [ 3302.446824] [<ffffffff810ad3d2>] load_module+0x4e2/0x530 [ 3302.452215] [<ffffffff8127ae40>] ? ddebug_dyndbg_boot_param_cb+0x60/0x60 [ 3302.458979] [<ffffffff810ad5f1>] SyS_init_module+0xd1/0x130 [ 3302.464627] [<ffffffff814b9652>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 3302.490090] RIP [<ffffffff813fe62a>] __rtnl_link_unregister+0x9a/0xd0 [ 3302.496607] RSP <ffff880eba4a1dd8> [ 3302.500084] CR2: 0000000000000008 [ 3302.503466] ---[ end trace 8342d49cd49f78ed ]--- The reason is that when loading dummy, if __rtnl_link_register() return failed, the init_module should return and avoid take the wrong path. Signed-off-by: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-07-11 19:04:02 +08:00