kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-09-26 18:16:26 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/drivers/opp/of.c

635 lines
16 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: add missing of_node_put() for of_get_cpu_node() Commit 762792913f8c (PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used) moved away from using cpu_dev->of_node because of some limitations. However, commit 7467c9d95989 (of: return of_get_cpu_node from of_cpu_device_node_get if CPUs are not registered) added support to fall back to of_get_cpu_node() if called if CPUs are not registered yet. Add the missing of_node_put() for the CPU device nodes. Also go back to using of_cpu_device_node_get() in dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() to avoid scanning the device tree again. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org> Fixes: 762792913f8c (PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used) Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-10-12 11:32:23 +01:00
PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:19 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move away from RCU locking The RCU locking isn't well suited for the OPP core. The RCU locking fits better for reader heavy stuff, while the OPP core have at max one or two readers only at a time. Over that, it was getting very confusing the way RCU locking was used with the OPP core. The individual OPPs are mostly well handled, i.e. for an update a new structure was created and then that replaced the older one. But the OPP tables were updated directly all the time from various parts of the core. Though they were mostly used from within RCU locked region, they didn't had much to do with RCU and were governed by the mutex instead. And that mixed with the 'opp_table_lock' has made the core even more confusing. Now that we are already managing the OPPs and the OPP tables with kernel reference infrastructure, we can get rid of RCU locking completely and simplify the code a lot. Remove all RCU references from code and comments. Acquire opp_table->lock while parsing the list of OPPs though. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:49 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add 'UNKNOWN' status for shared_opp in struct opp_table dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case when the OPP core doesn't know whether or not the table is shared. It works on the majority of platforms, where the OPP table is never created before invoking the function and then -ENODEV is returned by it. But in the case of one platform (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation is a bit different. The OPP table has been created (somehow) before dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and it returns 0. Its caller treats that as 'the CPUs don't share OPPs' and that leads to degraded performance. Fix this by converting 'shared_opp' in struct opp_table to an enum and making dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() return -EINVAL in case when the value of that field is "access unknown", so that the caller can handle it accordingly (cpufreq-dt considers that as 'all CPUs share the table', for example). Fixes: 6f707daa3833 "PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()" Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw : Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-06-16 19:03:11 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't support OPP if it provides supported-hw but platform does not The OPP framework allows each OPP to set a opp-supported-hw property which provides values that are matched against supported_hw values provided by the platform to limit support for certain OPPs on specific hardware. Currently, if the platform does not set supported_hw values, all OPPs are interpreted as supported, even if they have provided their own opp-supported-hw values. If an OPP has provided opp-supported-hw, it is indicating that there is some specific hardware configuration it is supported by. These constraints should be honored, and if no supported_hw has been provided by the platform, there is no way to determine if that OPP is actually supported, so it should be marked as not supported. Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-23 15:07:47 -05:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:19 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:19 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: opp-microvolt is not optional if regulators are set If dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() is called for a device and its regulators are set in the OPP core, the OPP nodes for the device must contain the "opp-microvolt" property, otherwise there is something wrong and we better error out. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-05-23 09:32:12 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:19 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:19 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:19 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:19 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:19 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:19 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:19 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Rename and split _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() Later patches would want to remove OPP table (and its OPPs) using the opp_table pointer instead of 'dev'. In order to prepare for that, rename _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() as _dev_pm_opp_find_and_remove_table() split out part of it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:00 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used We fail dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() when possible CPU device does not exist. This can happen on platforms where not all possible CPUs are available at start up ie. hotplugged out. The CPU device is not registered in the system so we are not able to check struct device to set the sharing CPUs bitmask properly. Example (real use case): 2 physical MIPS cores, 4 VPE, cpu0/2 run Linux and cpu1/3 are not available for Linux at boot up. cpufreq-dt driver + OPP v2 fail to register opp_table due to the fact there is no struct device for cpu1 (remains offline at bootup). To solve the bug, stop using device struct to check device_node. Instead get CPU device_node directly from device tree with of_get_cpu_node(). Signed-off-by: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-27 12:01:17 +02:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used We fail dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() when possible CPU device does not exist. This can happen on platforms where not all possible CPUs are available at start up ie. hotplugged out. The CPU device is not registered in the system so we are not able to check struct device to set the sharing CPUs bitmask properly. Example (real use case): 2 physical MIPS cores, 4 VPE, cpu0/2 run Linux and cpu1/3 are not available for Linux at boot up. cpufreq-dt driver + OPP v2 fail to register opp_table due to the fact there is no struct device for cpu1 (remains offline at bootup). To solve the bug, stop using device struct to check device_node. Instead get CPU device_node directly from device tree with of_get_cpu_node(). Signed-off-by: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-27 12:01:17 +02:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Expose _of_get_opp_desc_node as dev_pm_opp API Rename _of_get_opp_desc_node to dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node and add it to include/linux/pm_opp.h to allow other drivers, such as platform OPP and cpufreq drivers, to make use of it. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-02-03 11:29:26 -06:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Fix memory leak while adding duplicate OPPs There are two types of duplicate OPPs that get different behavior from the core: A) An earlier OPP is marked 'available' and has same freq/voltages as the new one. B) An earlier OPP with same frequency, but is marked 'unavailable' OR doesn't have same voltages as the new one. The OPP core returns 0 for the first one, but -EEXIST for the second. While the OPP core returns 0 for the first case, its callers don't free the newly allocated OPP structure which isn't used anymore. Fix that by returning -EBUSY instead of 0, but make the callers return 0 eventually. As this isn't a critical fix, its not getting marked for stable kernel. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:40:55 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Fix memory leak while adding duplicate OPPs There are two types of duplicate OPPs that get different behavior from the core: A) An earlier OPP is marked 'available' and has same freq/voltages as the new one. B) An earlier OPP with same frequency, but is marked 'unavailable' OR doesn't have same voltages as the new one. The OPP core returns 0 for the first one, but -EEXIST for the second. While the OPP core returns 0 for the first case, its callers don't free the newly allocated OPP structure which isn't used anymore. Fix that by returning -EBUSY instead of 0, but make the callers return 0 eventually. As this isn't a critical fix, its not getting marked for stable kernel. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:40:55 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Manage supply's voltage/current in a separate structure This is a preparatory step for multiple regulator per device support. Move the voltage/current variables to a new structure. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:17 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator(). This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with multiple regulators. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01 16:28:19 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move away from RCU locking The RCU locking isn't well suited for the OPP core. The RCU locking fits better for reader heavy stuff, while the OPP core have at max one or two readers only at a time. Over that, it was getting very confusing the way RCU locking was used with the OPP core. The individual OPPs are mostly well handled, i.e. for an update a new structure was created and then that replaced the older one. But the OPP tables were updated directly all the time from various parts of the core. Though they were mostly used from within RCU locked region, they didn't had much to do with RCU and were governed by the mutex instead. And that mixed with the 'opp_table_lock' has made the core even more confusing. Now that we are already managing the OPPs and the OPP tables with kernel reference infrastructure, we can get rid of RCU locking completely and simplify the code a lot. Remove all RCU references from code and comments. Acquire opp_table->lock while parsing the list of OPPs though. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:49 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add missing of_node_put(np) The for_each_available_child_of_node() loop in _of_add_opp_table_v2() doesn't drop the reference to "np" on errors. Fix that. Fixes: 274659029c9d (PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings) Cc: 4.3+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3+ Signed-off-by: Tobias Jordan <Tobias.Jordan@elektrobit.com> [ VK: Improved commit log. ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-10-04 11:35:03 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add 'UNKNOWN' status for shared_opp in struct opp_table dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case when the OPP core doesn't know whether or not the table is shared. It works on the majority of platforms, where the OPP table is never created before invoking the function and then -ENODEV is returned by it. But in the case of one platform (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation is a bit different. The OPP table has been created (somehow) before dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and it returns 0. Its caller treats that as 'the CPUs don't share OPPs' and that leads to degraded performance. Fix this by converting 'shared_opp' in struct opp_table to an enum and making dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() return -EINVAL in case when the value of that field is "access unknown", so that the caller can handle it accordingly (cpufreq-dt considers that as 'all CPUs share the table', for example). Fixes: 6f707daa3833 "PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()" Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw : Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-06-16 19:03:11 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Error out on failing to add static OPPs for v1 bindings The code adding static OPPs for V2 bindings already does so. Make the V1 bindings specific code behave the same. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:40:58 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Error out on failing to add static OPPs for v1 bindings The code adding static OPPs for V2 bindings already does so. Make the V1 bindings specific code behave the same. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:40:58 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() instead of _add_opp_table() Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:45 +05:30
PM / OPP: Don't allocate OPP table from _opp_allocate() There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the OPP entry. Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as the callers call them with that lock already held. Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free() now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-02 14:41:01 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Expose _of_get_opp_desc_node as dev_pm_opp API Rename _of_get_opp_desc_node to dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node and add it to include/linux/pm_opp.h to allow other drivers, such as platform OPP and cpufreq drivers, to make use of it. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-02-03 11:29:26 -06:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: OF: Use pr_debug() instead of pr_err() while adding OPP table Some platforms add the OPPs dynamically from platform specific drivers instead of getting them statically from DT. The cpufreq-dt driver already ignores the return value of dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() to not error out for such cases, but we still end up printing error message from that routine. That's not nice. Convert the print message to use pr_debug() instead. Reported-by: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-12 09:21:49 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used We fail dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() when possible CPU device does not exist. This can happen on platforms where not all possible CPUs are available at start up ie. hotplugged out. The CPU device is not registered in the system so we are not able to check struct device to set the sharing CPUs bitmask properly. Example (real use case): 2 physical MIPS cores, 4 VPE, cpu0/2 run Linux and cpu1/3 are not available for Linux at boot up. cpufreq-dt driver + OPP v2 fail to register opp_table due to the fact there is no struct device for cpu1 (remains offline at bootup). To solve the bug, stop using device struct to check device_node. Instead get CPU device_node directly from device tree with of_get_cpu_node(). Signed-off-by: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-27 12:01:17 +02:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Expose _of_get_opp_desc_node as dev_pm_opp API Rename _of_get_opp_desc_node to dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node and add it to include/linux/pm_opp.h to allow other drivers, such as platform OPP and cpufreq drivers, to make use of it. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-02-03 11:29:26 -06:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: fix debug/error messages in dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() These log messages are wrong because _of_get_opp_desc_node() returns an operating-points-v2 node. Commit a6eed752f5fb ("PM / OPP: passing NULL to PTR_ERR()") fixed static checker warnings, and reworded the messages at the same time (but the latter was not mentioned in the git-log). Restore the correct messages. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-10-20 16:12:49 +09:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: add missing of_node_put() for of_get_cpu_node() Commit 762792913f8c (PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used) moved away from using cpu_dev->of_node because of some limitations. However, commit 7467c9d95989 (of: return of_get_cpu_node from of_cpu_device_node_get if CPUs are not registered) added support to fall back to of_get_cpu_node() if called if CPUs are not registered yet. Add the missing of_node_put() for the CPU device nodes. Also go back to using of_cpu_device_node_get() in dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() to avoid scanning the device tree again. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org> Fixes: 762792913f8c (PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used) Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-10-12 11:32:23 +01:00
PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used We fail dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() when possible CPU device does not exist. This can happen on platforms where not all possible CPUs are available at start up ie. hotplugged out. The CPU device is not registered in the system so we are not able to check struct device to set the sharing CPUs bitmask properly. Example (real use case): 2 physical MIPS cores, 4 VPE, cpu0/2 run Linux and cpu1/3 are not available for Linux at boot up. cpufreq-dt driver + OPP v2 fail to register opp_table due to the fact there is no struct device for cpu1 (remains offline at bootup). To solve the bug, stop using device struct to check device_node. Instead get CPU device_node directly from device tree with of_get_cpu_node(). Signed-off-by: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-27 12:01:17 +02:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used We fail dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() when possible CPU device does not exist. This can happen on platforms where not all possible CPUs are available at start up ie. hotplugged out. The CPU device is not registered in the system so we are not able to check struct device to set the sharing CPUs bitmask properly. Example (real use case): 2 physical MIPS cores, 4 VPE, cpu0/2 run Linux and cpu1/3 are not available for Linux at boot up. cpufreq-dt driver + OPP v2 fail to register opp_table due to the fact there is no struct device for cpu1 (remains offline at bootup). To solve the bug, stop using device struct to check device_node. Instead get CPU device_node directly from device tree with of_get_cpu_node(). Signed-off-by: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-27 12:01:17 +02:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used We fail dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() when possible CPU device does not exist. This can happen on platforms where not all possible CPUs are available at start up ie. hotplugged out. The CPU device is not registered in the system so we are not able to check struct device to set the sharing CPUs bitmask properly. Example (real use case): 2 physical MIPS cores, 4 VPE, cpu0/2 run Linux and cpu1/3 are not available for Linux at boot up. cpufreq-dt driver + OPP v2 fail to register opp_table due to the fact there is no struct device for cpu1 (remains offline at bootup). To solve the bug, stop using device struct to check device_node. Instead get CPU device_node directly from device tree with of_get_cpu_node(). Signed-off-by: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-27 12:01:17 +02:00
PM / OPP: add missing of_node_put() for of_get_cpu_node() Commit 762792913f8c (PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used) moved away from using cpu_dev->of_node because of some limitations. However, commit 7467c9d95989 (of: return of_get_cpu_node from of_cpu_device_node_get if CPUs are not registered) added support to fall back to of_get_cpu_node() if called if CPUs are not registered yet. Add the missing of_node_put() for the CPU device nodes. Also go back to using of_cpu_device_node_get() in dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() to avoid scanning the device tree again. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org> Fixes: 762792913f8c (PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used) Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-10-12 11:32:23 +01:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30
PM / OPP: Fix get sharing CPUs when hotplug is used We fail dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() when possible CPU device does not exist. This can happen on platforms where not all possible CPUs are available at start up ie. hotplugged out. The CPU device is not registered in the system so we are not able to check struct device to set the sharing CPUs bitmask properly. Example (real use case): 2 physical MIPS cores, 4 VPE, cpu0/2 run Linux and cpu1/3 are not available for Linux at boot up. cpufreq-dt driver + OPP v2 fail to register opp_table due to the fact there is no struct device for cpu1 (remains offline at bootup). To solve the bug, stop using device struct to check device_node. Instead get CPU device_node directly from device tree with of_get_cpu_node(). Signed-off-by: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemarx.rymarkiewicz@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-27 12:01:17 +02:00
PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and ifdef hackery makes it less readable. Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Compile-tested: - For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled - For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately) No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-05 16:20:33 +05:30