kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-09-26 18:16:26 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/drivers/block/loop.h

95 lines
2.3 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
move linux/loop.h to drivers/block Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-05-12 10:14:07 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate include/linux Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2012-10-13 10:46:48 +01:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
loop: add blk-mq.h include Looks like we pull it in through other ways on x86, but we fail on sparc: In file included from drivers/block/cryptoloop.c:30:0: drivers/block/loop.h:63:24: error: field 'tag_set' has incomplete type struct blk_mq_tag_set tag_set; Add the include to loop.h, kill it from loop.c. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-01-02 15:20:25 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] sem2mutex: drivers/block/loop.c Semaphore to mutex conversion. The conversion was generated via scripts, and the result was validated automatically via a script as well. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-23 03:00:38 -08:00
block: loop: use kthread_work The following patch will use dio/aio to submit IO to backing file, then it needn't to schedule IO concurrently from work, so use kthread_work for decreasing context switch cost a lot. For non-AIO case, single thread has been used for long long time, and it was just converted to work in v4.0, which has caused performance regression for fedora live booting already. In discussion[1], even though submitting I/O via work concurrently can improve random read IO throughput, meantime it might hurt sequential read IO performance, so better to restore to single thread behaviour. For the following AIO support, it is better to use multi hw-queue with per-hwq kthread than current work approach suppose there is so high performance requirement for loop. [1] http://marc.info/?t=143082678400002&r=1&w=2 Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-08-17 10:31:48 +08:00
UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate include/linux Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2012-10-13 10:46:48 +01:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
block: loop: don't hold lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open The lo_ctl_mutex is held for running all ioctl handlers, and in some ioctl handlers, ioctl_by_bdev(BLKRRPART) is called for rereading partitions, which requires bd_mutex. So it is easy to cause failure because trylock(bd_mutex) may fail inside blkdev_reread_part(), and follows the lock context: blkid or other application: ->open() ->mutex_lock(bd_mutex) ->lo_open() ->mutex_lock(lo_ctl_mutex) losetup(set fd ioctl): ->mutex_lock(lo_ctl_mutex) ->ioctl_by_bdev(BLKRRPART) ->trylock(bd_mutex) This patch trys to eliminate the ABBA lock dependency by removing lo_ctl_mutext in lo_open() with the following approach: 1) make lo_refcnt as atomic_t and avoid acquiring lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open(): - for open vs. add/del loop, no any problem because of loop_index_mutex - freeze request queue during clr_fd, so I/O can't come until clearing fd is completed, like the effect of holding lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open - both open() and release() have been serialized by bd_mutex already 2) don't hold lo_ctl_mutex for decreasing/checking lo_refcnt in lo_release(), then lo_ctl_mutex is only required for the last release. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-05-06 12:26:23 +08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
userns: Convert loop to use kuid_t instead of uid_t Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2012-02-11 11:23:51 -08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] gfp_t: remaining bits of drivers/* Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-10-21 03:22:34 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] sem2mutex: drivers/block/loop.c Semaphore to mutex conversion. The conversion was generated via scripts, and the result was validated automatically via a script as well. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-23 03:00:38 -08:00
block: loop: use kthread_work The following patch will use dio/aio to submit IO to backing file, then it needn't to schedule IO concurrently from work, so use kthread_work for decreasing context switch cost a lot. For non-AIO case, single thread has been used for long long time, and it was just converted to work in v4.0, which has caused performance regression for fedora live booting already. In discussion[1], even though submitting I/O via work concurrently can improve random read IO throughput, meantime it might hurt sequential read IO performance, so better to restore to single thread behaviour. For the following AIO support, it is better to use multi hw-queue with per-hwq kthread than current work approach suppose there is so high performance requirement for loop. [1] http://marc.info/?t=143082678400002&r=1&w=2 Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-08-17 10:31:48 +08:00
block: loop: prepare for supporing direct IO This patches provides one interface for enabling direct IO from user space: - userspace(such as losetup) can pass 'file' which is opened/fcntl as O_DIRECT Also __loop_update_dio() is introduced to check if direct I/O can be used on current loop setting. The last big change is to introduce LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO flag for userspace to know if direct IO is used to access backing file. Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-08-17 10:31:49 +08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
loop.h build fix include/linux/loop.h:66: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'request_queue_t' Cc: Sebastian Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-23 18:44:00 -07:00
block: loop: improve performance via blk-mq The conversion is a bit straightforward, and use work queue to dispatch requests of loop block, and one big change is that requests is submitted to backend file/device concurrently with work queue, so throughput may get improved much. Given write requests over same file are often run exclusively, so don't handle them concurrently for avoiding extra context switch cost, possible lock contention and work schedule cost. Also with blk-mq, there is opportunity to get loop I/O merged before submitting to backend file/device. In the following test: - base: v3.19-rc2-2041231 - loop over file in ext4 file system on SSD disk - bs: 4k, libaio, io depth: 64, O_DIRECT, num of jobs: 1 - throughput: IOPS ------------------------------------------------------ | | base | base with loop-mq | delta | ------------------------------------------------------ | randread | 1740 | 25318 | +1355%| ------------------------------------------------------ | read | 42196 | 51771 | +22.6%| ----------------------------------------------------- | randwrite | 35709 | 34624 | -3% | ----------------------------------------------------- | write | 39137 | 40326 | +3% | ----------------------------------------------------- So loop-mq can improve throughput for both read and randread, meantime, performance of write and randwrite isn't hurted basically. Another benefit is that loop driver code gets simplified much after blk-mq conversion, and the patch can be thought as cleanup too. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2014-12-31 13:22:57 +00:00
remove artificial software max_loop limit Remove artificial maximum 256 loop device that can be created due to a legacy device number limit. Searching through lkml archive, there are several instances where users complained about the artificial limit that the loop driver impose. There is no reason to have such limit. This patch rid the limit entirely and make loop device and associated block queue instantiation on demand. With on-demand instantiation, it also gives the benefit of not wasting memory if these devices are not in use (compare to current implementation that always create 8 loop devices), a net improvement in both areas. This version is both tested with creation of large number of loop devices and is compatible with existing losetup/mount user land tools. There are a number of people who worked on this and provided valuable suggestions, in no particular order, by: Jens Axboe Jan Engelhardt Christoph Hellwig Thomas M Signed-off-by: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com> Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-08 00:28:20 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
block: loop: improve performance via blk-mq The conversion is a bit straightforward, and use work queue to dispatch requests of loop block, and one big change is that requests is submitted to backend file/device concurrently with work queue, so throughput may get improved much. Given write requests over same file are often run exclusively, so don't handle them concurrently for avoiding extra context switch cost, possible lock contention and work schedule cost. Also with blk-mq, there is opportunity to get loop I/O merged before submitting to backend file/device. In the following test: - base: v3.19-rc2-2041231 - loop over file in ext4 file system on SSD disk - bs: 4k, libaio, io depth: 64, O_DIRECT, num of jobs: 1 - throughput: IOPS ------------------------------------------------------ | | base | base with loop-mq | delta | ------------------------------------------------------ | randread | 1740 | 25318 | +1355%| ------------------------------------------------------ | read | 42196 | 51771 | +22.6%| ----------------------------------------------------- | randwrite | 35709 | 34624 | -3% | ----------------------------------------------------- | write | 39137 | 40326 | +3% | ----------------------------------------------------- So loop-mq can improve throughput for both read and randread, meantime, performance of write and randwrite isn't hurted basically. Another benefit is that loop driver code gets simplified much after blk-mq conversion, and the patch can be thought as cleanup too. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2014-12-31 13:22:57 +00:00
block: loop: use kthread_work The following patch will use dio/aio to submit IO to backing file, then it needn't to schedule IO concurrently from work, so use kthread_work for decreasing context switch cost a lot. For non-AIO case, single thread has been used for long long time, and it was just converted to work in v4.0, which has caused performance regression for fedora live booting already. In discussion[1], even though submitting I/O via work concurrently can improve random read IO throughput, meantime it might hurt sequential read IO performance, so better to restore to single thread behaviour. For the following AIO support, it is better to use multi hw-queue with per-hwq kthread than current work approach suppose there is so high performance requirement for loop. [1] http://marc.info/?t=143082678400002&r=1&w=2 Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-08-17 10:31:48 +08:00
block: loop: improve performance via blk-mq The conversion is a bit straightforward, and use work queue to dispatch requests of loop block, and one big change is that requests is submitted to backend file/device concurrently with work queue, so throughput may get improved much. Given write requests over same file are often run exclusively, so don't handle them concurrently for avoiding extra context switch cost, possible lock contention and work schedule cost. Also with blk-mq, there is opportunity to get loop I/O merged before submitting to backend file/device. In the following test: - base: v3.19-rc2-2041231 - loop over file in ext4 file system on SSD disk - bs: 4k, libaio, io depth: 64, O_DIRECT, num of jobs: 1 - throughput: IOPS ------------------------------------------------------ | | base | base with loop-mq | delta | ------------------------------------------------------ | randread | 1740 | 25318 | +1355%| ------------------------------------------------------ | read | 42196 | 51771 | +22.6%| ----------------------------------------------------- | randwrite | 35709 | 34624 | -3% | ----------------------------------------------------- | write | 39137 | 40326 | +3% | ----------------------------------------------------- So loop-mq can improve throughput for both read and randread, meantime, performance of write and randwrite isn't hurted basically. Another benefit is that loop driver code gets simplified much after blk-mq conversion, and the patch can be thought as cleanup too. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2014-12-31 13:22:57 +00:00
loop: remove union of use_aio and ref in struct loop_cmd When the request is completed, lo_complete_rq() checks cmd->use_aio. However, if this is in fact an aio request, cmd->use_aio will have already been reused as cmd->ref by lo_rw_aio*. Fix it by not using a union. On x86_64, there's a hole after the union anyways, so this doesn't make struct loop_cmd any bigger. Fixes: 92d773324b7e ("block/loop: fix use after free") Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-09-20 14:24:34 -07:00
loop: zero-fill bio on the submitting cpu In thruth I've just audited which blk-mq drivers don't currently have a complete callback, but I think this change is at least borderline useful. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2017-04-20 16:03:02 +02:00
block: loop: support DIO & AIO There are at least 3 advantages to use direct I/O and AIO on read/write loop's backing file: 1) double cache can be avoided, then memory usage gets decreased a lot 2) not like user space direct I/O, there isn't cost of pinning pages 3) avoid context switch for obtaining good throughput - in buffered file read, random I/O top throughput is often obtained only if they are submitted concurrently from lots of tasks; but for sequential I/O, most of times they can be hit from page cache, so concurrent submissions often introduce unnecessary context switch and can't improve throughput much. There was such discussion[1] to use non-blocking I/O to improve the problem for application. - with direct I/O and AIO, concurrent submissions can be avoided and random read throughput can't be affected meantime xfstests(-g auto, ext4) is basically passed when running with direct I/O(aio), one exception is generic/232, but it failed in loop buffered I/O(4.2-rc6-next-20150814) too. Follows the fio test result for performance purpose: 4 jobs fio test inside ext4 file system over loop block 1) How to run - KVM: 4 VCPUs, 2G RAM - linux kernel: 4.2-rc6-next-20150814(base) with the patchset - the loop block is over one image on SSD. - linux psync, 4 jobs, size 1500M, ext4 over loop block - test result: IOPS from fio output 2) Throughput(IOPS) becomes a bit better with direct I/O(aio) ------------------------------------------------------------- test cases |randread |read |randwrite |write | ------------------------------------------------------------- base |8015 |113811 |67442 |106978 ------------------------------------------------------------- base+loop aio |8136 |125040 |67811 |111376 ------------------------------------------------------------- - somehow, it should be caused by more page cache avaiable for application or one extra page copy is avoided in case of direct I/O 3) context switch - context switch decreased by ~50% with loop direct I/O(aio) compared with loop buffered I/O(4.2-rc6-next-20150814) 4) memory usage from /proc/meminfo ------------------------------------------------------------- | Buffers | Cached ------------------------------------------------------------- base | > 760MB | ~950MB ------------------------------------------------------------- base+loop direct I/O(aio) | < 5MB | ~1.6GB ------------------------------------------------------------- - so there are much more page caches available for application with direct I/O [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/612483/ Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2015-08-17 10:31:51 +08:00
block/loop: allow request merge for directio mode Currently loop disables merge. While it makes sense for buffer IO mode, directio mode can benefit from request merge. Without merge, loop could send small size IO to underlayer disk and harm performance. Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-08-31 22:09:46 -07:00
block/loop: make loop cgroup aware loop block device handles IO in a separate thread. The actual IO dispatched isn't cloned from the IO loop device received, so the dispatched IO loses the cgroup context. I'm ignoring buffer IO case now, which is quite complicated. Making the loop thread aware cgroup context doesn't really help. The loop device only writes to a single file. In current writeback cgroup implementation, the file can only belong to one cgroup. For direct IO case, we could workaround the issue in theory. For example, say we assign cgroup1 5M/s BW for loop device and cgroup2 10M/s. We can create a special cgroup for loop thread and assign at least 15M/s for the underlayer disk. In this way, we correctly throttle the two cgroups. But this is tricky to setup. This patch tries to address the issue. We record bio's css in loop command. When loop thread is handling the command, we then use the API provided in patch 1 to set the css for current task. The bio layer will use the css for new IO (from patch 3). Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-09-25 13:07:22 -06:00
block: loop: improve performance via blk-mq The conversion is a bit straightforward, and use work queue to dispatch requests of loop block, and one big change is that requests is submitted to backend file/device concurrently with work queue, so throughput may get improved much. Given write requests over same file are often run exclusively, so don't handle them concurrently for avoiding extra context switch cost, possible lock contention and work schedule cost. Also with blk-mq, there is opportunity to get loop I/O merged before submitting to backend file/device. In the following test: - base: v3.19-rc2-2041231 - loop over file in ext4 file system on SSD disk - bs: 4k, libaio, io depth: 64, O_DIRECT, num of jobs: 1 - throughput: IOPS ------------------------------------------------------ | | base | base with loop-mq | delta | ------------------------------------------------------ | randread | 1740 | 25318 | +1355%| ------------------------------------------------------ | read | 42196 | 51771 | +22.6%| ----------------------------------------------------- | randwrite | 35709 | 34624 | -3% | ----------------------------------------------------- | write | 39137 | 40326 | +3% | ----------------------------------------------------- So loop-mq can improve throughput for both read and randread, meantime, performance of write and randwrite isn't hurted basically. Another benefit is that loop driver code gets simplified much after blk-mq conversion, and the patch can be thought as cleanup too. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2014-12-31 13:22:57 +00:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00