kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-10-09 18:15:49 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/scripts/package/mkspec

146 lines
4.7 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
rpm-pkg: add generation of kernel-devel Change the spec file to generate a kernel-devel module allowing for compilation of external kernel modules. This patch requires a new minimum RPM level of 4.0.3. Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
2013-07-08 13:14:06 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: clean up mkspec Clean up the mkspec without changing the behavior. - grep CONFIG_DRM=y more simply - move "EXCLUDE" out of the "%install" section because it can be computed when the spec file is generated - remove "BuildRoot:" field, which is now redundant - do not mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/modules explicitly because it is automatically created by "make modules_install" - exclude "%package devel" from source package spec file because it does not make sense where "%files devel" is already excluded - exclude "%build" from source package spec file - remove unneeded "make clean" because we had already cleaned before making tar file - merge two %ifarch ia64 conditionals - replace KBUILD_IMAGE with direct use of $(make image_name) - remove trailing empty line from the spec file Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:05 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: fix build error when CONFIG_MODULES is disabled When CONFIG_MODULES is disabled, make rpm-pkg / binrpm-pkg fails with the following message: The present kernel configuration has modules disabled. Type 'make config' and enable loadable module support. Then build a kernel with module support enabled. Do not install modules in the case. Also, omit the devel package. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:07 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: clean up mkspec Clean up the mkspec without changing the behavior. - grep CONFIG_DRM=y more simply - move "EXCLUDE" out of the "%install" section because it can be computed when the spec file is generated - remove "BuildRoot:" field, which is now redundant - do not mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/modules explicitly because it is automatically created by "make modules_install" - exclude "%package devel" from source package spec file because it does not make sense where "%files devel" is already excluded - exclude "%build" from source package spec file - remove unneeded "make clean" because we had already cleaned before making tar file - merge two %ifarch ia64 conditionals - replace KBUILD_IMAGE with direct use of $(make image_name) - remove trailing empty line from the spec file Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:05 +09:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: clean up mkspec Clean up the mkspec without changing the behavior. - grep CONFIG_DRM=y more simply - move "EXCLUDE" out of the "%install" section because it can be computed when the spec file is generated - remove "BuildRoot:" field, which is now redundant - do not mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/modules explicitly because it is automatically created by "make modules_install" - exclude "%package devel" from source package spec file because it does not make sense where "%files devel" is already excluded - exclude "%build" from source package spec file - remove unneeded "make clean" because we had already cleaned before making tar file - merge two %ifarch ia64 conditionals - replace KBUILD_IMAGE with direct use of $(make image_name) - remove trailing empty line from the spec file Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:05 +09:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: fix build error when CONFIG_MODULES is disabled When CONFIG_MODULES is disabled, make rpm-pkg / binrpm-pkg fails with the following message: The present kernel configuration has modules disabled. Type 'make config' and enable loadable module support. Then build a kernel with module support enabled. Do not install modules in the case. Also, omit the devel package. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:07 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: clean up mkspec Clean up the mkspec without changing the behavior. - grep CONFIG_DRM=y more simply - move "EXCLUDE" out of the "%install" section because it can be computed when the spec file is generated - remove "BuildRoot:" field, which is now redundant - do not mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/modules explicitly because it is automatically created by "make modules_install" - exclude "%package devel" from source package spec file because it does not make sense where "%files devel" is already excluded - exclude "%build" from source package spec file - remove unneeded "make clean" because we had already cleaned before making tar file - merge two %ifarch ia64 conditionals - replace KBUILD_IMAGE with direct use of $(make image_name) - remove trailing empty line from the spec file Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:05 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: fix build error when CONFIG_MODULES is disabled When CONFIG_MODULES is disabled, make rpm-pkg / binrpm-pkg fails with the following message: The present kernel configuration has modules disabled. Type 'make config' and enable loadable module support. Then build a kernel with module support enabled. Do not install modules in the case. Also, omit the devel package. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:07 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT must be escaped to prevent shell from expanding it when generating the spec file. %{build_root} is more readable than \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:08 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT must be escaped to prevent shell from expanding it when generating the spec file. %{build_root} is more readable than \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:08 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT must be escaped to prevent shell from expanding it when generating the spec file. %{build_root} is more readable than \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:08 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT must be escaped to prevent shell from expanding it when generating the spec file. %{build_root} is more readable than \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:08 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT must be escaped to prevent shell from expanding it when generating the spec file. %{build_root} is more readable than \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:08 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: Support GNU tar >= 1.29 There is a change in how command line parsing is done in this version. Excludes and includes are now ordered with the file list. Since the spec file puts the file list before the exclude list it means newer tar ignores the excludes and packs all the build output into the kernel-devel RPM resulting in a huge package. Simple argument re-ordering fixes the problem. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2018-03-23 11:59:36 -06:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT must be escaped to prevent shell from expanding it when generating the spec file. %{build_root} is more readable than \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:08 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: fix build error when CONFIG_MODULES is disabled When CONFIG_MODULES is disabled, make rpm-pkg / binrpm-pkg fails with the following message: The present kernel configuration has modules disabled. Type 'make config' and enable loadable module support. Then build a kernel with module support enabled. Do not install modules in the case. Also, omit the devel package. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:07 +09:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT must be escaped to prevent shell from expanding it when generating the spec file. %{build_root} is more readable than \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:08 +09:00
kbuild: add vmlinux to kernel rpm We are building an automated system to test kernels weekly and need to provide an rpm to our QA dept. We would like to use the ability to create kernel rpms already in the kernel's Makefile, but need the vmlinux file included in the rpm for later debugging. This patch adds a compressed vmlinux to the kernel rpm when doing a make rpm-pkg or binrpm-pkg and upon install places the vmlinux file in /boot. Signed-off-by: Josh Hunt <josh@scalex86.org> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
2009-02-11 21:10:57 -08:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
rpm-pkg: add generation of kernel-devel Change the spec file to generate a kernel-devel module allowing for compilation of external kernel modules. This patch requires a new minimum RPM level of 4.0.3. Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
2013-07-08 13:14:06 -04:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: use kernel-install as a fallback for new-kernel-pkg The new-kernel-pkg script is only present when grubby is installed, but it may not always be the case. So if the script isn't present, attempt to use the kernel-install script as a fallback instead. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2018-04-11 20:15:24 +02:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: fix build error when CONFIG_MODULES is disabled When CONFIG_MODULES is disabled, make rpm-pkg / binrpm-pkg fails with the following message: The present kernel configuration has modules disabled. Type 'make config' and enable loadable module support. Then build a kernel with module support enabled. Do not install modules in the case. Also, omit the devel package. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:07 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: fix build error when CONFIG_MODULES is disabled When CONFIG_MODULES is disabled, make rpm-pkg / binrpm-pkg fails with the following message: The present kernel configuration has modules disabled. Type 'make config' and enable loadable module support. Then build a kernel with module support enabled. Do not install modules in the case. Also, omit the devel package. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:07 +09:00
kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <<EOF ..." I confirmed this commit still produced the same (bin)kernel.spec as before. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2017-09-30 10:10:06 +09:00