linux

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Update the copyright notice and description of power.c The description and copyright notice of drivers/acpi/power.c is out of date, so update it as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2015-07-16 02:01:28 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Update the copyright notice and description of power.c The description and copyright notice of drivers/acpi/power.c is out of date, so update it as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2015-07-16 02:01:28 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Update the copyright notice and description of power.c The description and copyright notice of drivers/acpi/power.c is out of date, so update it as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2015-07-16 02:01:28 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Update the copyright notice and description of power.c The description and copyright notice of drivers/acpi/power.c is out of date, so update it as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2015-07-16 02:01:28 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>

2010-03-24 17:04:11 +09:00

ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device to/from power resources Devices may share same list of power resources in _PR0, for example Device(Dev0) { Name (_PR0, Package (0x01) { P0PR, P1PR }) } Device(Dev1) { Name (_PR0, Package (0x01) { P0PR, P1PR } } Assume Dev0 and Dev1 were runtime suspended. Then Dev0 is resumed first and it goes into D0 state. But Dev1 is left in D0_Uninitialised state. This is wrong. In this case, Dev1 must be resumed too. In order to hand this case, each power resource maintains a list of devices which relies on it. When power resource is ON, it will check if the devices on its list can be resumed. The device can only be resumed when all the power resouces of its _PR0 are ON. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2012-03-29 14:09:39 +08:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI: Clean up inclusions of ACPI header files Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h> inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-12-03 08:49:16 +08:00

ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter The wakeup.prepared flag is used for marking devices that have the wake-up power already enabled, so that the wake-up power is not enabled twice in a row for the same device. This assumes, however, that device wake-up power will only be enabled once, while the device is being prepared for a system-wide sleep transition, and the second attempt is made by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_prep(). With the upcoming PCI wake-up rework this assumption will not hold any more for PCI bridges and the root bridge whose wake-up power may be enabled as a result of wake-up enable propagation from other devices (eg. add-on devices that are not associated with any GPEs). Thus, there may be many attempts to enable wake-up power on a PCI bridge or the root bridge during a system power state transition and it's better to replace wakeup.prepared with a reference counter. Reviewed-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2009-09-08 23:15:31 +02:00

ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device to/from power resources Devices may share same list of power resources in _PR0, for example Device(Dev0) { Name (_PR0, Package (0x01) { P0PR, P1PR }) } Device(Dev1) { Name (_PR0, Package (0x01) { P0PR, P1PR } } Assume Dev0 and Dev1 were runtime suspended. Then Dev0 is resumed first and it goes into D0 state. But Dev1 is left in D0_Uninitialised state. This is wrong. In this case, Dev1 must be resumed too. In order to hand this case, each power resource maintains a list of devices which relies on it. When power resource is ON, it will check if the devices on its list can be resumed. The device can only be resumed when all the power resouces of its _PR0 are ON. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2012-03-29 14:09:39 +08:00

ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter The wakeup.prepared flag is used for marking devices that have the wake-up power already enabled, so that the wake-up power is not enabled twice in a row for the same device. This assumes, however, that device wake-up power will only be enabled once, while the device is being prepared for a system-wide sleep transition, and the second attempt is made by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_prep(). With the upcoming PCI wake-up rework this assumption will not hold any more for PCI bridges and the root bridge whose wake-up power may be enabled as a result of wake-up enable propagation from other devices (eg. add-on devices that are not associated with any GPEs). Thus, there may be many attempts to enable wake-up power on a PCI bridge or the root bridge during a system power state transition and it's better to replace wakeup.prepared with a reference counter. Reviewed-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2009-09-08 23:15:31 +02:00

ACPI: consolidate ACPI_*_COMPONENT definitions in acpi_drivers.h Move all the component definitions for drivers to a single shared place, include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2008-11-07 16:57:45 -07:00

ACPI: clean up ACPI_MODULE_NAME() use cosmetic only Make "module name" actually match the file name. Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care. Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-12 22:42:12 -05:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Add "acpi.power_nocheck=1" to disable power state check in power transition Maybe the incorrect power state is returned on the bogus bios, which is different with the real power state. For example: the bios returns D0 state and the real power state is D3. OS expects to set the device to D0 state. In such case if OS uses the power state returned by the BIOS and checks the device power state very strictly in power transition, the device can't be transited to the correct power state. So the boot option of "acpi.power_nocheck=1" is added to avoid checking the device power in the course of device power transition. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8049 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11000 Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2008-08-11 14:57:50 +08:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Expose current status of ACPI power resources Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it becomes necessary for user space (powertop in particular) to observe some properties of those resources for diagnostics purposes. For this reason, expose the current status of each ACPI power resource to user space via sysfs by adding a new resource_in_use attribute to the sysfs directory representing the given power resource. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-24 12:50:09 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Expose current status of ACPI power resources Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it becomes necessary for user space (powertop in particular) to observe some properties of those resources for diagnostics purposes. For this reason, expose the current status of each ACPI power resource to user space via sysfs by adding a new resource_in_use attribute to the sysfs directory representing the given power resource. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-24 12:50:09 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Consolidate extraction of power resources lists The lists of ACPI power resources are currently extracted in two different ways, one for wakeup power resources and one for power resources that device power states depend on. There is no reason why it should be done differently in those two cases, so introduce a common routine for extracting power resources lists from data returned by AML, acpi_extract_power_resources(), and make the namespace scanning code use it for both wakeup and device power states power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Consolidate extraction of power resources lists The lists of ACPI power resources are currently extracted in two different ways, one for wakeup power resources and one for power resources that device power states depend on. There is no reason why it should be done differently in those two cases, so introduce a common routine for extracting power resources lists from data returned by AML, acpi_extract_power_resources(), and make the namespace scanning code use it for both wakeup and device power states power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Consolidate extraction of power resources lists The lists of ACPI power resources are currently extracted in two different ways, one for wakeup power resources and one for power resources that device power states depend on. There is no reason why it should be done differently in those two cases, so introduce a common routine for extracting power resources lists from data returned by AML, acpi_extract_power_resources(), and make the namespace scanning code use it for both wakeup and device power states power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Consolidate extraction of power resources lists The lists of ACPI power resources are currently extracted in two different ways, one for wakeup power resources and one for power resources that device power states depend on. There is no reason why it should be done differently in those two cases, so introduce a common routine for extracting power resources lists from data returned by AML, acpi_extract_power_resources(), and make the namespace scanning code use it for both wakeup and device power states power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Consolidate extraction of power resources lists The lists of ACPI power resources are currently extracted in two different ways, one for wakeup power resources and one for power resources that device power states depend on. There is no reason why it should be done differently in those two cases, so introduce a common routine for extracting power resources lists from data returned by AML, acpi_extract_power_resources(), and make the namespace scanning code use it for both wakeup and device power states power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Consolidate extraction of power resources lists The lists of ACPI power resources are currently extracted in two different ways, one for wakeup power resources and one for power resources that device power states depend on. There is no reason why it should be done differently in those two cases, so introduce a common routine for extracting power resources lists from data returned by AML, acpi_extract_power_resources(), and make the namespace scanning code use it for both wakeup and device power states power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Consolidate extraction of power resources lists The lists of ACPI power resources are currently extracted in two different ways, one for wakeup power resources and one for power resources that device power states depend on. There is no reason why it should be done differently in those two cases, so introduce a common routine for extracting power resources lists from data returned by AML, acpi_extract_power_resources(), and make the namespace scanning code use it for both wakeup and device power states power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI: Get the device power state in the course of scanning device Get the device power state in the course of scanning device if the device power flag is power_managable. i.e. The device has the _PSx/_PRx object. At the same time before the drivers/acpi/power module is loaded, there is no relation between acpi_power_resource and acpi device. So the first parameter of acpi_power_get_state is changed to acpi_handle. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8049 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11000 Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2008-08-11 14:55:05 +08:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

ACPI: Change acpi_evaluate_integer to support 64-bit on 32-bit kernels As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers. The current acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms. Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support 64-bit integers on all platforms. lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long" lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update() Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2008-10-10 02:22:59 -04:00

ACPI: power.c: call acpi_get_name to get node name acpi_ut_get_node_name is an internal acpica function. use acpi_get_name to get node ascii name Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2008-12-16 17:02:22 +08:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Get the device power state in the course of scanning device Get the device power state in the course of scanning device if the device power flag is power_managable. i.e. The device has the _PSx/_PRx object. At the same time before the drivers/acpi/power module is loaded, there is no relation between acpi_power_resource and acpi device. So the first parameter of acpi_power_get_state is changed to acpi_handle. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8049 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11000 Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2008-08-11 14:55:05 +08:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Get the device power state in the course of scanning device Get the device power state in the course of scanning device if the device power flag is power_managable. i.e. The device has the _PSx/_PRx object. At the same time before the drivers/acpi/power module is loaded, there is no relation between acpi_power_resource and acpi device. So the first parameter of acpi_power_get_state is changed to acpi_handle. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8049 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11000 Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2008-08-11 14:55:05 +08:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: power: don't cache power resource state ACPI may change power resource state behind our back, so don't keep our local copy, which may not be valid. Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-10-22 14:19:09 +04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: power.c: call acpi_get_name to get node name acpi_ut_get_node_name is an internal acpica function. use acpi_get_name to get node ascii name Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2008-12-16 17:02:22 +08:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: power.c: call acpi_get_name to get node name acpi_ut_get_node_name is an internal acpica function. use acpi_get_name to get node ascii name Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2008-12-16 17:02:22 +08:00

ACPI: fix de-reference bug in power resource driver change state to *state in the function of acpi_power_get_state() Signed-off-by: yakui.zhao@intel.com Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2008-10-27 16:04:53 +08:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Check status of power resources under mutexes It certainly is not a good idea to execute _ON or _OFF and _STA for the same power resource at the same time which may happen in some circumstances in theory. To prevent that from happening, read the power state of each power resource under its mutex, as that will prevent the state from being changed at the same time. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2011-01-06 23:38:57 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Check status of power resources under mutexes It certainly is not a good idea to execute _ON or _OFF and _STA for the same power resource at the same time which may happen in some circumstances in theory. To prevent that from happening, read the power state of each power resource under its mutex, as that will prevent the state from being changed at the same time. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2011-01-06 23:38:57 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Check status of power resources under mutexes It certainly is not a good idea to execute _ON or _OFF and _STA for the same power resource at the same time which may happen in some circumstances in theory. To prevent that from happening, read the power state of each power resource under its mutex, as that will prevent the state from being changed at the same time. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2011-01-06 23:38:57 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Check status of power resources under mutexes It certainly is not a good idea to execute _ON or _OFF and _STA for the same power resource at the same time which may happen in some circumstances in theory. To prevent that from happening, read the power state of each power resource under its mutex, as that will prevent the state from being changed at the same time. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2011-01-06 23:38:57 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI / power: add missing newline to debug messages There are few places in power.c where debug messages have no newline at the end. Reading such debug messages from dmesg is not fun, so fix this by adding the missing newlines. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: All <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-07-05 12:15:56 +03:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI / power: Drop automaitc resume of power resource dependent devices The mechanism causing devices depending on a given power resource (that is, devices that can be in D0 only if that power resource is on) to be resumed automatically when the power resource is turned on (and their "inferred" power state becomes D0 as a result) is inherently racy and in fact unnecessary. It is racy, because if the power resource is turned on and then immediately off, the device resume triggered by the first transition to "on" may still happen, causing the power resource to be turned on again. That again will trigger the "resume of dependent devices" mechanism, but if the devices in question are not in use, they will be suspended in the meantime causing the power resource to be turned off. However, the "resume of dependent devices" will next resume them again and so on. In some cases (USB port PM in particular) that leads to an endless busy loop of flipping the resource on and off continuously. It is needless, because whoever turns a power resource on will most likely turn it off at some point and the devices that go into "D0" as a result of turning it on will then go back into D3cold (generally, the state they were in before). Moreover, turning on all power resources a device needs to go into D0 is not sufficient for a full transition into D0 in general. Namely, _PS0 may need to be executed in addition to that in some cases. This means that the whole rationale of the "resume of dependent devices" mechanism was incorrect to begin with and it's best to remove it entirely. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-10-16 23:05:42 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Do not refcount power resources that can't be turned on If turning on a power resource fails, do not reference count it, since it cannot be in use in that case. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:03:32 +01:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

ACPI / PM: Do not refcount power resources that can't be turned on If turning on a power resource fails, do not reference count it, since it cannot be in use in that case. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:03:32 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Fix consistency check for power resources during resume During system resume we check if there are power resources that have been turned off by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are nonzero (they need to be turned on then). It turns out, however, that we also need to check the opposite, i.e. if there are power resources that have been turned on by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are zero (which means that no devices are going to need them any time soon) and we should turn them off. Make the power resources resume code do the additional check and turn off the unused power resources as appropriate. This change has been tested on HP nx6325. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-25 21:51:57 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI / power: add missing newline to debug messages There are few places in power.c where debug messages have no newline at the end. Reading such debug messages from dmesg is not fun, so fix this by adding the missing newlines. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: All <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-07-05 12:15:56 +03:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Fix consistency check for power resources during resume During system resume we check if there are power resources that have been turned off by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are nonzero (they need to be turned on then). It turns out, however, that we also need to check the opposite, i.e. if there are power resources that have been turned on by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are zero (which means that no devices are going to need them any time soon) and we should turn them off. Make the power resources resume code do the additional check and turn off the unused power resources as appropriate. This change has been tested on HP nx6325. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-25 21:51:57 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Add functions for manipulating lists of power resources ACPI device power resources should be reference counted during device initialization, so that their reference counters are always up to date. It is convenient to do that with the help of a function that will reference count and possibly turn on power resources in a given list, so introduce that function, acpi_power_on_list(). For symmetry, introduce acpi_power_off_list() for performing the reverse operation and use the both of them to simplify acpi_power_transition(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:06:09 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Add functions for manipulating lists of power resources ACPI device power resources should be reference counted during device initialization, so that their reference counters are always up to date. It is convenient to do that with the help of a function that will reference count and possibly turn on power resources in a given list, so introduce that function, acpi_power_on_list(). For symmetry, introduce acpi_power_off_list() for performing the reverse operation and use the both of them to simplify acpi_power_transition(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:06:09 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Add functions for manipulating lists of power resources ACPI device power resources should be reference counted during device initialization, so that their reference counters are always up to date. It is convenient to do that with the help of a function that will reference count and possibly turn on power resources in a given list, so introduce that function, acpi_power_on_list(). For symmetry, introduce acpi_power_off_list() for performing the reverse operation and use the both of them to simplify acpi_power_transition(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:06:09 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Add functions for manipulating lists of power resources ACPI device power resources should be reference counted during device initialization, so that their reference counters are always up to date. It is convenient to do that with the help of a function that will reference count and possibly turn on power resources in a given list, so introduce that function, acpi_power_on_list(). For symmetry, introduce acpi_power_off_list() for performing the reverse operation and use the both of them to simplify acpi_power_transition(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:06:09 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on power resources Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on. Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0 state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices depend on what power resources. For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code from kernel subsystems using ACPI. For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent() and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage such dependencies. Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on power resources Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on. Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0 state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices depend on what power resources. For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code from kernel subsystems using ACPI. For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent() and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage such dependencies. Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-25 21:51:32 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on power resources Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on. Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0 state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices depend on what power resources. For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code from kernel subsystems using ACPI. For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent() and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage such dependencies. Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device wakeup power resources to user space Commit 18a3870 (ACPI / PM: Expose lists of device power resources to user space) exposed the lists of ACPI power resources associated with power states of ACPI devices, but it didn't expose the lists of ACPI wakeup power resources, which also is necessary to get the full picture of dependencies between ACPI devices and power resources. For this reason, for every ACPI device node having a list of ACPI wakeup power resources associated with it, expose that list to user space in analogy with commit 18a3870. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-04-11 22:41:48 +02:00

ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device to/from power resources Devices may share same list of power resources in _PR0, for example Device(Dev0) { Name (_PR0, Package (0x01) { P0PR, P1PR }) } Device(Dev1) { Name (_PR0, Package (0x01) { P0PR, P1PR } } Assume Dev0 and Dev1 were runtime suspended. Then Dev0 is resumed first and it goes into D0 state. But Dev1 is left in D0_Uninitialised state. This is wrong. In this case, Dev1 must be resumed too. In order to hand this case, each power resource maintains a list of devices which relies on it. When power resource is ON, it will check if the devices on its list can be resumed. The device can only be resumed when all the power resouces of its _PR0 are ON. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2012-03-29 14:09:39 +08:00

ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on power resources Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on. Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0 state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices depend on what power resources. For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code from kernel subsystems using ACPI. For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent() and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage such dependencies. Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI: Use system level attribute of wakeup power resources The system level attribute of ACPI power resources is the lowest system sleep level (S0, S2 etc.) in which the given resource can be "on" (ACPI 5.0, Section 7.1). On the other hand, wakeup power resources have to be "on" for devices depending on them to be able to signal wakeup. Therefore devices cannot wake up the system from sleep states higher than the minimum of the system level attributes of their wakeup power resources. Use the wakeup power resources' system level values to get the deepest system sleep state (highest system sleep level) the given device can wake up the system from. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI: Use system level attribute of wakeup power resources The system level attribute of ACPI power resources is the lowest system sleep level (S0, S2 etc.) in which the given resource can be "on" (ACPI 5.0, Section 7.1). On the other hand, wakeup power resources have to be "on" for devices depending on them to be able to signal wakeup. Therefore devices cannot wake up the system from sleep states higher than the minimum of the system level attributes of their wakeup power resources. Use the wakeup power resources' system level values to get the deepest system sleep state (highest system sleep level) the given device can wake up the system from. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI: Use system level attribute of wakeup power resources The system level attribute of ACPI power resources is the lowest system sleep level (S0, S2 etc.) in which the given resource can be "on" (ACPI 5.0, Section 7.1). On the other hand, wakeup power resources have to be "on" for devices depending on them to be able to signal wakeup. Therefore devices cannot wake up the system from sleep states higher than the minimum of the system level attributes of their wakeup power resources. Use the wakeup power resources' system level values to get the deepest system sleep state (highest system sleep level) the given device can wake up the system from. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI: Use system level attribute of wakeup power resources The system level attribute of ACPI power resources is the lowest system sleep level (S0, S2 etc.) in which the given resource can be "on" (ACPI 5.0, Section 7.1). On the other hand, wakeup power resources have to be "on" for devices depending on them to be able to signal wakeup. Therefore devices cannot wake up the system from sleep states higher than the minimum of the system level attributes of their wakeup power resources. Use the wakeup power resources' system level values to get the deepest system sleep state (highest system sleep level) the given device can wake up the system from. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI: Use system level attribute of wakeup power resources The system level attribute of ACPI power resources is the lowest system sleep level (S0, S2 etc.) in which the given resource can be "on" (ACPI 5.0, Section 7.1). On the other hand, wakeup power resources have to be "on" for devices depending on them to be able to signal wakeup. Therefore devices cannot wake up the system from sleep states higher than the minimum of the system level attributes of their wakeup power resources. Use the wakeup power resources' system level values to get the deepest system sleep state (highest system sleep level) the given device can wake up the system from. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on power resources Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on. Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0 state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices depend on what power resources. For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code from kernel subsystems using ACPI. For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent() and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage such dependencies. Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device to/from power resources Devices may share same list of power resources in _PR0, for example Device(Dev0) { Name (_PR0, Package (0x01) { P0PR, P1PR }) } Device(Dev1) { Name (_PR0, Package (0x01) { P0PR, P1PR } } Assume Dev0 and Dev1 were runtime suspended. Then Dev0 is resumed first and it goes into D0 state. But Dev1 is left in D0_Uninitialised state. This is wrong. In this case, Dev1 must be resumed too. In order to hand this case, each power resource maintains a list of devices which relies on it. When power resource is ON, it will check if the devices on its list can be resumed. The device can only be resumed when all the power resouces of its _PR0 are ON. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2012-03-29 14:09:39 +08:00

ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake function The currect ACPI code attempts to execute _PSW at three different places and in one of them only it tries to execute _DSW before _PSW, which is inconsistent with the other two cases. Move the execution of _DSW and _PSW into a separate function called acpi_device_sleep_wake() and call it wherever appropriate instead of executing _DSW and/or _PSW directly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:33:34 +02:00

ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method() Introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method() and use it in a number of places to simplify code. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-06-29 00:24:39 +08:00

ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake function The currect ACPI code attempts to execute _PSW at three different places and in one of them only it tries to execute _DSW before _PSW, which is inconsistent with the other two cases. Move the execution of _DSW and _PSW into a separate function called acpi_device_sleep_wake() and call it wherever appropriate instead of executing _DSW and/or _PSW directly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:33:34 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake function The currect ACPI code attempts to execute _PSW at three different places and in one of them only it tries to execute _DSW before _PSW, which is inconsistent with the other two cases. Move the execution of _DSW and _PSW into a separate function called acpi_device_sleep_wake() and call it wherever appropriate instead of executing _DSW and/or _PSW directly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:33:34 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake function The currect ACPI code attempts to execute _PSW at three different places and in one of them only it tries to execute _DSW before _PSW, which is inconsistent with the other two cases. Move the execution of _DSW and _PSW into a separate function called acpi_device_sleep_wake() and call it wherever appropriate instead of executing _DSW and/or _PSW directly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:33:34 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of wakeup power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of wakeup power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake function The currect ACPI code attempts to execute _PSW at three different places and in one of them only it tries to execute _DSW before _PSW, which is inconsistent with the other two cases. Move the execution of _DSW and _PSW into a separate function called acpi_device_sleep_wake() and call it wherever appropriate instead of executing _DSW and/or _PSW directly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:33:34 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter The wakeup.prepared flag is used for marking devices that have the wake-up power already enabled, so that the wake-up power is not enabled twice in a row for the same device. This assumes, however, that device wake-up power will only be enabled once, while the device is being prepared for a system-wide sleep transition, and the second attempt is made by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_prep(). With the upcoming PCI wake-up rework this assumption will not hold any more for PCI bridges and the root bridge whose wake-up power may be enabled as a result of wake-up enable propagation from other devices (eg. add-on devices that are not associated with any GPEs). Thus, there may be many attempts to enable wake-up power on a PCI bridge or the root bridge during a system power state transition and it's better to replace wakeup.prepared with a reference counter. Reviewed-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2009-09-08 23:15:31 +02:00

ACPI: Introduce new device wakeup flag 'prepared' Introduce additional flag 'prepared' in struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags and use it to prevent devices from being enable/disabled do wake up the system multiple times in a row (this does not happen currently, but will be possible after some of the following patches). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:34:11 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter The wakeup.prepared flag is used for marking devices that have the wake-up power already enabled, so that the wake-up power is not enabled twice in a row for the same device. This assumes, however, that device wake-up power will only be enabled once, while the device is being prepared for a system-wide sleep transition, and the second attempt is made by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_prep(). With the upcoming PCI wake-up rework this assumption will not hold any more for PCI bridges and the root bridge whose wake-up power may be enabled as a result of wake-up enable propagation from other devices (eg. add-on devices that are not associated with any GPEs). Thus, there may be many attempts to enable wake-up power on a PCI bridge or the root bridge during a system power state transition and it's better to replace wakeup.prepared with a reference counter. Reviewed-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2009-09-08 23:15:31 +02:00

ACPI: Introduce new device wakeup flag 'prepared' Introduce additional flag 'prepared' in struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags and use it to prevent devices from being enable/disabled do wake up the system multiple times in a row (this does not happen currently, but will be possible after some of the following patches). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:34:11 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake function The currect ACPI code attempts to execute _PSW at three different places and in one of them only it tries to execute _DSW before _PSW, which is inconsistent with the other two cases. Move the execution of _DSW and _PSW into a separate function called acpi_device_sleep_wake() and call it wherever appropriate instead of executing _DSW and/or _PSW directly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:33:34 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of wakeup power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of wakeup power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake function The currect ACPI code attempts to execute _PSW at three different places and in one of them only it tries to execute _DSW before _PSW, which is inconsistent with the other two cases. Move the execution of _DSW and _PSW into a separate function called acpi_device_sleep_wake() and call it wherever appropriate instead of executing _DSW and/or _PSW directly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:33:34 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter The wakeup.prepared flag is used for marking devices that have the wake-up power already enabled, so that the wake-up power is not enabled twice in a row for the same device. This assumes, however, that device wake-up power will only be enabled once, while the device is being prepared for a system-wide sleep transition, and the second attempt is made by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_prep(). With the upcoming PCI wake-up rework this assumption will not hold any more for PCI bridges and the root bridge whose wake-up power may be enabled as a result of wake-up enable propagation from other devices (eg. add-on devices that are not associated with any GPEs). Thus, there may be many attempts to enable wake-up power on a PCI bridge or the root bridge during a system power state transition and it's better to replace wakeup.prepared with a reference counter. Reviewed-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2009-09-08 23:15:31 +02:00

ACPI: Introduce new device wakeup flag 'prepared' Introduce additional flag 'prepared' in struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags and use it to prevent devices from being enable/disabled do wake up the system multiple times in a row (this does not happen currently, but will be possible after some of the following patches). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:34:11 +02:00

ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter The wakeup.prepared flag is used for marking devices that have the wake-up power already enabled, so that the wake-up power is not enabled twice in a row for the same device. This assumes, however, that device wake-up power will only be enabled once, while the device is being prepared for a system-wide sleep transition, and the second attempt is made by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_prep(). With the upcoming PCI wake-up rework this assumption will not hold any more for PCI bridges and the root bridge whose wake-up power may be enabled as a result of wake-up enable propagation from other devices (eg. add-on devices that are not associated with any GPEs). Thus, there may be many attempts to enable wake-up power on a PCI bridge or the root bridge during a system power state transition and it's better to replace wakeup.prepared with a reference counter. Reviewed-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2009-09-08 23:15:31 +02:00

ACPI: Introduce new device wakeup flag 'prepared' Introduce additional flag 'prepared' in struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags and use it to prevent devices from being enable/disabled do wake up the system multiple times in a row (this does not happen currently, but will be possible after some of the following patches). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:34:11 +02:00

ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter The wakeup.prepared flag is used for marking devices that have the wake-up power already enabled, so that the wake-up power is not enabled twice in a row for the same device. This assumes, however, that device wake-up power will only be enabled once, while the device is being prepared for a system-wide sleep transition, and the second attempt is made by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_prep(). With the upcoming PCI wake-up rework this assumption will not hold any more for PCI bridges and the root bridge whose wake-up power may be enabled as a result of wake-up enable propagation from other devices (eg. add-on devices that are not associated with any GPEs). Thus, there may be many attempts to enable wake-up power on a PCI bridge or the root bridge during a system power state transition and it's better to replace wakeup.prepared with a reference counter. Reviewed-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2009-09-08 23:15:31 +02:00

ACPI: Introduce new device wakeup flag 'prepared' Introduce additional flag 'prepared' in struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags and use it to prevent devices from being enable/disabled do wake up the system multiple times in a row (this does not happen currently, but will be possible after some of the following patches). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2008-07-07 03:34:11 +02:00

ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter The wakeup.prepared flag is used for marking devices that have the wake-up power already enabled, so that the wake-up power is not enabled twice in a row for the same device. This assumes, however, that device wake-up power will only be enabled once, while the device is being prepared for a system-wide sleep transition, and the second attempt is made by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_prep(). With the upcoming PCI wake-up rework this assumption will not hold any more for PCI bridges and the root bridge whose wake-up power may be enabled as a result of wake-up enable propagation from other devices (eg. add-on devices that are not associated with any GPEs). Thus, there may be many attempts to enable wake-up power on a PCI bridge or the root bridge during a system power state transition and it's better to replace wakeup.prepared with a reference counter. Reviewed-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2009-09-08 23:15:31 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take unusual configurations of power resources into account Commit d2e5f0c (ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup) moved the initial disabling of system wakeup for PCI devices into a place where it can actually work and that exposed a hidden old issue with crap^Wunusual system designs where the same power resources are used for both wakeup power and device power control at run time. Namely, say there is one power resource such that the ACPI power state D0 of a PCI device depends on that power resource (i.e. the device is in D0 when that power resource is "on") and it is used as a wakeup power resource for the same device. Then, calling acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false) for the device in question will cause the reference counter of that power resource to drop to 0, which in turn will cause it to be turned off. As a result, the device will go into D3cold at that point, although it should have stayed in D0. As it turns out, that happens to USB controllers on some laptops and USB becomes unusable on those machines as a result, which is a major regression from v3.8. To fix this problem, (1) increment the reference counters of wakup power resources during their initialization if they are "on" initially, (2) prevent acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power() from decrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that were not enabled for wakeup power previously, and (3) prevent acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() from incrementing the reference counters of wakeup power resources that already are enabled for wakeup power. In addition to that, if it is impossible to determine the initial states of wakeup power resources, avoid enabling wakeup for devices whose wakeup power depends on those power resources. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-02-23 23:15:21 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI PM: Replace wakeup.prepared with reference counter The wakeup.prepared flag is used for marking devices that have the wake-up power already enabled, so that the wake-up power is not enabled twice in a row for the same device. This assumes, however, that device wake-up power will only be enabled once, while the device is being prepared for a system-wide sleep transition, and the second attempt is made by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_prep(). With the upcoming PCI wake-up rework this assumption will not hold any more for PCI bridges and the root bridge whose wake-up power may be enabled as a result of wake-up enable propagation from other devices (eg. add-on devices that are not associated with any GPEs). Thus, there may be many attempts to enable wake-up power on a PCI bridge or the root bridge during a system power state transition and it's better to replace wakeup.prepared with a reference counter. Reviewed-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

2009-09-08 23:15:31 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Prevent acpi_power_get_inferred_state() from making changes acpi_power_get_inferred_state() should not update device->power.state behind the back of its caller, so make it return the state via a pointer instead. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:05:17 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Prevent acpi_power_get_inferred_state() from making changes acpi_power_get_inferred_state() should not update device->power.state behind the back of its caller, so make it return the state via a pointer instead. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:05:17 +01:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Make __acpi_bus_get_power() cover D3cold correctly After recent changes of the ACPI device power states definitions, if power resources are not used for the device's power management, the state returned by __acpi_bus_get_power() cannot exceed D3hot, because the return values of _PSC are 0 through 3. However, if the _PR3 method is not present for the device and _PS3 returns 3, we have to assume that the device is in D3cold, so the value returned by __acpi_bus_get_power() in that case should be 4. Similarly, acpi_power_get_inferred_state() should take the power resources for the D3hot state into account in general, so that it can return 3 if those resources are "on" or 4 (D3cold) otherwise. Fix the the above two issues and make sure that if both _PSC and _PR3 are present for the device, the power resources listed by _PR3 will be used to determine if the number 3 returned by _PSC is meant to represent D3cold or D3hot. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

2012-05-20 13:58:00 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Prevent acpi_power_get_inferred_state() from making changes acpi_power_get_inferred_state() should not update device->power.state behind the back of its caller, so make it return the state via a pointer instead. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:05:17 +01:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Rework device power management to follow ACPI 6 The ACPI 6 specification has made some changes in the device power management area. In particular: * The D3hot power state is now supposed to be always available (instead of D3cold) and D3cold is only regarded as valid if the _PR3 object is present for the given device. * The required ordering of transitions into power states deeper than D0 is now such that for a transition into state Dx the _PSx method is supposed to be executed first, if present, and the states of the power resources the device depends on are supposed to be changed after that. * It is now explicitly forbidden to transition devices from lower-power (deeper) into higher-power (shallower) power states other than D0. Those changes have been made so the specification reflects the Windows' device power management code that the vast majority of systems using ACPI is validated against. To avoid artificial differences in ACPI device power management between Windows and Linux, modify the ACPI device power management code to follow the new specification. Add comments explaining the code flow in some unclear places. This only may affect some real corner cases in which the OS behavior expected by the firmware is different from the Windows one, but that's quite unlikely. The transition ordering change affects transitions to D1 and D2 which are rarely used (if at all) and into D3hot and D3cold for devices actually having _PR3, but those are likely to be validated against Windows anyway. The other changes may affect code calling acpi_device_get_power() or acpi_device_update_power() where ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT may be returned instead of ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD (that's why the ACPI fan driver needs to be updated too) and since transitions into ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT may remove power now, it is better to avoid this one in acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() if the "no power off" PM QoS flag is set. The only existing user of acpi_device_can_poweroff() really cares about the case when _PR3 is present, so the change in that function should not cause any problems to happen too. A plus is that PCI_D3hot can be mapped to ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT now and the compatibility with older systems should be covered automatically. In any case, if any real problems result from this, it still will be better to follow the Windows' behavior (which now is reflected by the specification too) in general and handle the cases when it doesn't work via quirks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2015-05-16 01:55:35 +02:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Introduce function for refcounting device power resources Introduce function acpi_power_on_resources() that reference counts and possibly turns on ACPI power resources for a given device and a given power state of it. This function will be used for reference counting device power resources during initialization. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:06:55 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Sanitize checks in acpi_power_on_resources() After the only user of acpi_power_on_resources(), acpi_bus_init_power(), has been changed to avoid calling it for state equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, it doesn't have to special case that state any more. For this reason, modify the checks in acpi_power_on_resources() so that it returns -EINVAL for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD as it should. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-22 12:56:16 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Introduce function for refcounting device power resources Introduce function acpi_power_on_resources() that reference counts and possibly turns on ACPI power resources for a given device and a given power state of it. This function will be used for reference counting device power resources during initialization. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:06:55 +01:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PCI / PM: Fix device PM regression related to D3hot/D3cold Commit 1cc0c998fdf2 ("ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusion") introduced a bug in __acpi_bus_set_power() and changed the behavior of acpi_pci_set_power_state() in such a way that it generally doesn't work as expected if PCI_D3hot is passed to it as the second argument. First off, if ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) is passed to __acpi_bus_set_power() and the explicit_set flag is set for the D3cold state, the function will try to execute AML method called "_PS4", which doesn't exist. Fix this by adding a check to ensure that the name of the AML method to execute for transitions to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD is correct in __acpi_bus_set_power(). Also make sure that the explicit_set flag for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD will be set if _PS3 is present and modify acpi_power_transition() to avoid accessing power resources for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, because they don't exist. Second, if PCI_D3hot is passed to acpi_pci_set_power_state() as the target state, the function will request a transition to ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT instead of ACPI_STATE_D3. However, ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT is now only marked as supported if the _PR3 AML method is defined for the given device, which is rare. This causes problems to happen on systems where devices were successfully put into ACPI D3 by pci_set_power_state(PCI_D3hot) which doesn't work now. In particular, some unused graphics adapters are not turned off as a result. To fix this issue restore the old behavior of acpi_pci_set_power_state(), which is to request a transition to ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) if either PCI_D3hot or PCI_D3cold is passed to it as the argument. This approach is not ideal, because generally power should not be removed from devices if PCI_D3hot is the target power state, but since this behavior is relied on, we have no choice but to restore it at the moment and spend more time on designing a better solution in the future. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43228 Reported-by: rocko <rockorequin@hotmail.com> Reported-by: Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org> Reported-and-tested-by: Peter <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

2012-05-18 00:39:35 +02:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Introduce ACPI D3_COLD state support If a device has _PR3, it means the device supports D3_COLD. Add the ability to validate and enter D3_COLD state in ACPI. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2012-03-29 14:09:38 +08:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Check device state before refcounting power resources Commit 3e384ee6c687cb397581ee8f9440fc8220cfac80 (ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources) introduced a regression by causing fan power resources to be turned on and reference counted unnecessarily during resume, so on some boxes fans are always on after resume. Fix the problem by checking if the current device state is different from the new state before reference counting and turning on power resources in acpi_power_transition(). Addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22932 . Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reported-and-tested-by: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:02:36 +01:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

ACPI: Introduce ACPI D3_COLD state support If a device has _PR3, it means the device supports D3_COLD. Add the ability to validate and enter D3_COLD state in ACPI. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2012-03-29 14:09:38 +08:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Add functions for manipulating lists of power resources ACPI device power resources should be reference counted during device initialization, so that their reference counters are always up to date. It is convenient to do that with the help of a function that will reference count and possibly turn on power resources in a given list, so introduce that function, acpi_power_on_list(). For symmetry, introduce acpi_power_off_list() for performing the reverse operation and use the both of them to simplify acpi_power_transition(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:06:09 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PCI / PM: Fix device PM regression related to D3hot/D3cold Commit 1cc0c998fdf2 ("ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusion") introduced a bug in __acpi_bus_set_power() and changed the behavior of acpi_pci_set_power_state() in such a way that it generally doesn't work as expected if PCI_D3hot is passed to it as the second argument. First off, if ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) is passed to __acpi_bus_set_power() and the explicit_set flag is set for the D3cold state, the function will try to execute AML method called "_PS4", which doesn't exist. Fix this by adding a check to ensure that the name of the AML method to execute for transitions to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD is correct in __acpi_bus_set_power(). Also make sure that the explicit_set flag for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD will be set if _PS3 is present and modify acpi_power_transition() to avoid accessing power resources for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, because they don't exist. Second, if PCI_D3hot is passed to acpi_pci_set_power_state() as the target state, the function will request a transition to ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT instead of ACPI_STATE_D3. However, ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT is now only marked as supported if the _PR3 AML method is defined for the given device, which is rare. This causes problems to happen on systems where devices were successfully put into ACPI D3 by pci_set_power_state(PCI_D3hot) which doesn't work now. In particular, some unused graphics adapters are not turned off as a result. To fix this issue restore the old behavior of acpi_pci_set_power_state(), which is to request a transition to ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) if either PCI_D3hot or PCI_D3cold is passed to it as the argument. This approach is not ideal, because generally power should not be removed from devices if PCI_D3hot is the target power state, but since this behavior is relied on, we have no choice but to restore it at the moment and spend more time on designing a better solution in the future. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43228 Reported-by: rocko <rockorequin@hotmail.com> Reported-by: Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org> Reported-and-tested-by: Peter <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

2012-05-18 00:39:35 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Add functions for manipulating lists of power resources ACPI device power resources should be reference counted during device initialization, so that their reference counters are always up to date. It is convenient to do that with the help of a function that will reference count and possibly turn on power resources in a given list, so introduce that function, acpi_power_on_list(). For symmetry, introduce acpi_power_off_list() for performing the reverse operation and use the both of them to simplify acpi_power_transition(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:06:09 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / PM: Add functions for manipulating lists of power resources ACPI device power resources should be reference counted during device initialization, so that their reference counters are always up to date. It is convenient to do that with the help of a function that will reference count and possibly turn on power resources in a given list, so introduce that function, acpi_power_on_list(). For symmetry, introduce acpi_power_off_list() for performing the reverse operation and use the both of them to simplify acpi_power_transition(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-11-25 00:06:09 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: delete tracing macros from drivers/acpi/*.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2006-06-27 00:41:40 -04:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Update PNPID set/free interfaces This patch introduces acpi_set_pnp_ids() and acpi_free_pnp_ids(), which are updated from acpi_device_set_id() and acpi_free_ids(), to setup and free acpi_device_pnp for a given acpi_handle. They can be called without acpi_device. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-03-04 21:30:42 +00:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Expose current status of ACPI power resources Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it becomes necessary for user space (powertop in particular) to observe some properties of those resources for diagnostics purposes. For this reason, expose the current status of each ACPI power resource to user space via sysfs by adding a new resource_in_use attribute to the sysfs directory representing the given power resource. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-24 12:50:09 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Turn power resources on and off in the right order during resume According to Section 7.2 of ACPI 6.0, power resources should always be enabled and disabled in order given by the "resourceorder" field of the corresponding Power Resource objects: "Power Resource levels are enabled from low values to high values and are disabled from high values to low values." However, this is not what happens during system resume, because in that case the enabling/disabling is carried out in the power resource registration order which may not reflect the ordering required by the platform. For this reason, make the ordering of the global list of all power resources in the system (used by the system resume code) reflect the one given by the "resourceorder" attributes of the Power Resource objects in the ACPI namespace and modify acpi_resume_power_resources() to walk the list in the reverse order when turning off the power resources that had been off before the system was suspended. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2015-05-21 04:19:49 +02:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

ACPI / PM: Fix error code path for power resources initialization Commit 781d737 (ACPI: Drop power resources driver) introduced a bug in the power resources initialization error code path causing a NULL pointer to be referenced in acpi_release_power_resource() if there's an error triggering a jump to the 'err' label in acpi_add_power_resource(). This happens because the list_node field of struct acpi_power_resource has not been initialized yet at this point and doing a list_del() on it is a bad idea. To prevent this problem from occuring, initialize the list_node field of struct acpi_power_resource upfront. Reported-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

2013-06-19 00:44:45 +02:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Do not use device power states of power resources ACPI power resource objects have struct acpi_device components, but they are only used for registering those resources in the device hierarchy. In particular, power state information stored in them is completely useless (amnong other things, because the power resources "devices" are not power manageable), so there is no reason for the power resources management code to keep it up to date. Remove the code updating device power states of power resources from drivers/acpi/power.c. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

ACPI: power: don't cache power resource state ACPI may change power resource state behind our back, so don't keep our local copy, which may not be valid. Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-10-22 14:19:09 +04:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:05 +01:00

ACPI / scan: Prevent device add uevents from racing with user space ACPI core adds sysfs device files after the given devices have been registered with device_register(), which is not appropriate, because it may lead to race conditions with user space tools using those files. Fix the problem by delaying the KOBJ_ADD uevent for ACPI devices until after all of the devices' sysfs files have been created. This also fixes a use-after-free in acpi_device_unregister(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-24 12:49:49 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI files Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2005-08-05 00:44:28 -04:00

ACPI / PM: Expose current status of ACPI power resources Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it becomes necessary for user space (powertop in particular) to observe some properties of those resources for diagnostics purposes. For this reason, expose the current status of each ACPI power resource to user space via sysfs by adding a new resource_in_use attribute to the sysfs directory representing the given power resource. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-24 12:50:09 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Turn power resources on and off in the right order during resume According to Section 7.2 of ACPI 6.0, power resources should always be enabled and disabled in order given by the "resourceorder" field of the corresponding Power Resource objects: "Power Resource levels are enabled from low values to high values and are disabled from high values to low values." However, this is not what happens during system resume, because in that case the enabling/disabling is carried out in the power resource registration order which may not reflect the ordering required by the platform. For this reason, make the ordering of the global list of all power resources in the system (used by the system resume code) reflect the one given by the "resourceorder" attributes of the Power Resource objects in the ACPI namespace and modify acpi_resume_power_resources() to walk the list in the reverse order when turning off the power resources that had been off before the system was suspended. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2015-05-21 04:19:49 +02:00

ACPI / scan: Prevent device add uevents from racing with user space ACPI core adds sysfs device files after the given devices have been registered with device_register(), which is not appropriate, because it may lead to race conditions with user space tools using those files. Fix the problem by delaying the KOBJ_ADD uevent for ACPI devices until after all of the devices' sysfs files have been created. This also fixes a use-after-free in acpi_device_unregister(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

2013-01-24 12:49:49 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Take power resource initialization errors into account Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:07 +01:00

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!

2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Fix reference counting of power resources The reference counting of ACPI power resources is currently broken for a few reasons. First, instead of using a simple reference counter per power resource it uses a list of objects representing refereces to the given power resource from devices. This leads to the second breakage, because it prevents power resources from being referenced more than once by one device, which is necessary if the device is configured to signal wakeup. Namely, when putting the device into a low power state we first call acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() that should reference count power resources needed for signaling wakeup and then we call acpi_power_transition() to power off the device. The latter call drops references to the device's power resources, possibly including the ones added by acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(), so the device can't signal wakeup as a result. Apart from this, the locking in acpi_power_on() and acpi_power_off_device() doesn't prevent all possible races from happening, which may be problematic for runtime PM and asynchronous suspend and resume. Fix the problem by using a counter for power resources reference counting and putting the evaluation of ACPI _ON and _OFF methods under the power resource mutex. Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2010-10-22 02:35:54 +02:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / power: Release resource_lock after acpi_power_get_state() return error In acpi_resume_power_resources() resource_lock should be released when acpi_power_get_state() fails and before passing to next power resource on the list. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-10-15 19:48:11 +08:00

ACPI / PM: Fix consistency check for power resources during resume During system resume we check if there are power resources that have been turned off by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are nonzero (they need to be turned on then). It turns out, however, that we also need to check the opposite, i.e. if there are power resources that have been turned on by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are zero (which means that no devices are going to need them any time soon) and we should turn them off. Make the power resources resume code do the additional check and turn off the unused power resources as appropriate. This change has been tested on HP nx6325. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-25 21:51:57 +01:00

ACPI / power: Release resource_lock after acpi_power_get_state() return error In acpi_resume_power_resources() resource_lock should be released when acpi_power_get_state() fails and before passing to next power resource on the list. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-10-15 19:48:11 +08:00

ACPI / PM: Fix consistency check for power resources during resume During system resume we check if there are power resources that have been turned off by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are nonzero (they need to be turned on then). It turns out, however, that we also need to check the opposite, i.e. if there are power resources that have been turned on by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are zero (which means that no devices are going to need them any time soon) and we should turn them off. Make the power resources resume code do the additional check and turn off the unused power resources as appropriate. This change has been tested on HP nx6325. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-25 21:51:57 +01:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI / PM: Turn power resources on and off in the right order during resume According to Section 7.2 of ACPI 6.0, power resources should always be enabled and disabled in order given by the "resourceorder" field of the corresponding Power Resource objects: "Power Resource levels are enabled from low values to high values and are disabled from high values to low values." However, this is not what happens during system resume, because in that case the enabling/disabling is carried out in the power resource registration order which may not reflect the ordering required by the platform. For this reason, make the ordering of the global list of all power resources in the system (used by the system resume code) reflect the one given by the "resourceorder" attributes of the Power Resource objects in the ACPI namespace and modify acpi_resume_power_resources() to walk the list in the reverse order when turning off the power resources that had been off before the system was suspended. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2015-05-21 04:19:49 +02:00

ACPI / PM: Fix consistency check for power resources during resume During system resume we check if there are power resources that have been turned off by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are nonzero (they need to be turned on then). It turns out, however, that we also need to check the opposite, i.e. if there are power resources that have been turned on by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are zero (which means that no devices are going to need them any time soon) and we should turn them off. Make the power resources resume code do the additional check and turn off the unused power resources as appropriate. This change has been tested on HP nx6325. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-25 21:51:57 +01:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

ACPI: Drop power resources driver The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

2013-01-17 14:11:06 +01:00

ACPI: Thermal issues on HP nx6325 The previous reference counting scheme to enable power resources got confused when multiple devices were present that might repeatedly enable or disable the resource and throw off the count. The new code simply lists the referencing devices which are requesting the resource to be enabled. When there are none, then it is off. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Karasyov <konstantin.a.karasyov@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

2007-02-16 01:47:06 -05:00

ACPI / PM: Fix unused function warnings for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP According to compiler warnings, several suspend/resume functions in ACPI drivers are not used for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP unset, so add #ifdefs to prevent them from being built in that case. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

2012-08-09 23:00:02 +02:00

888 lines 22 KiB Raw Permalink Normal View History

888 lines

22 KiB

Raw Permalink Normal View History