linux/fs/ext4/inode.c

5848 lines
169 KiB

include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 17:04:11 +09:00
ext4: handle symlink properly with inline_data This commit tries to fix a bug that we can't read symlink properly with inline data feature when the length of symlink is greater than 60 bytes but less than extra space. The key issue is in ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink() that it doesn't check whether or not an inode has inline data. When the user creates a new symlink, an inode will be allocated with MAY_INLINE_DATA flag. Then symlink will be stored in ->i_block and extended attribute space. In the mean time, this inode is with inline data flag. After remounting it, ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink() function thinks that this inode is a fast symlink so that the data in ->i_block is copied to the user, and the data in extra space is trimmed. In fact this inode should be as a normal symlink. The following script can hit this bug. #!/bin/bash cd ${MNT} filename=ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789 rm -rf test mkdir test cd test echo "hello" >$filename ln -s $filename symlinkfile cd sudo umount /mnt/sda1 sudo mount -t ext4 /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1 readlink /mnt/sda1/test/symlinkfile After applying this patch, it will break the assumption in e2fsck because the original implementation doesn't want to support symlink with inline data. Reported-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reported-by: Ian Nartowicz <claws@nartowicz.co.uk> Cc: Ian Nartowicz <claws@nartowicz.co.uk> Cc: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma> Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2014-06-02 10:48:22 -04:00
ext4: call ext4_ioend_wait and ext4_flush_completed_IO in ext4_evict_inode Flush inode's i_completed_io_list before calling ext4_io_wait to prevent the following deadlock scenario: A page fault happens while some process is writing inode A. During page fault, shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode B. Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait() that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero. However, inode B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue. As the ext4-dio-unwritten thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to grab inode A's i_mutex lock. Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock. Also moves ext4_flush_completed_IO and ext4_ioend_wait from ext4_destroy_inode() to ext4_evict_inode(). During inode deleteion, ext4_evict_inode() is called before ext4_destroy_inode() and in ext4_evict_inode(), we may call ext4_truncate() without holding i_mutex lock. As a result, there is a race between flush_completed_IO that is called from ext4_ext_truncate() and ext4_end_io_work, which may cause corruption on an io_end structure. This change moves ext4_flush_completed_IO and ext4_ioend_wait from ext4_destroy_inode() to ext4_evict_inode() to resolve the race between ext4_truncate() and ext4_end_io_work during inode deletion. Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
2011-08-13 12:17:13 -04:00
mm + fs: store shadow entries in page cache Reclaim will be leaving shadow entries in the page cache radix tree upon evicting the real page. As those pages are found from the LRU, an iput() can lead to the inode being freed concurrently. At this point, reclaim must no longer install shadow pages because the inode freeing code needs to ensure the page tree is really empty. Add an address_space flag, AS_EXITING, that the inode freeing code sets under the tree lock before doing the final truncate. Reclaim will check for this flag before installing shadow pages. Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Metin Doslu <metin@citusdata.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Ozgun Erdogan <ozgun@citusdata.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-03 14:47:49 -07:00
mm + fs: store shadow entries in page cache Reclaim will be leaving shadow entries in the page cache radix tree upon evicting the real page. As those pages are found from the LRU, an iput() can lead to the inode being freed concurrently. At this point, reclaim must no longer install shadow pages because the inode freeing code needs to ensure the page tree is really empty. Add an address_space flag, AS_EXITING, that the inode freeing code sets under the tree lock before doing the final truncate. Reclaim will check for this flag before installing shadow pages. Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Metin Doslu <metin@citusdata.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Ozgun Erdogan <ozgun@citusdata.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-03 14:47:49 -07:00
ext4: avoid possible overflow in ext4_map_blocks() The ext4_map_blocks() function returns the number of blocks which satisfying the caller's request. This number of blocks requested by the caller is specified by an unsigned integer, but the return value of ext4_map_blocks() is a signed integer (to accomodate error codes per the kernel's standard error signalling convention). Historically, overflows could never happen since mballoc() will refuse to allocate more than 2048 blocks at a time (which is something we should fix), and if the blocks were already allocated, the fact that there would be some number of intervening metadata blocks pretty much guaranteed that there could never be a contiguous region of data blocks that was greater than 2**31 blocks. However, this is now possible if there is a file system which is a bit bigger than 8TB, and is created using the new mke2fs hugeblock feature, which can create a perfectly contiguous file. In that case, if a userspace program attempted to call fallocate() on this already fully allocated file, it's possible that ext4_map_blocks() could return a number large enough that it would overflow a signed integer, resulting in a ext4 thinking that the ext4_map_blocks() call had failed with some strange error code. Since ext4_map_blocks() is always free to return a smaller number of blocks than what was requested by the caller, fix this by capping the number of blocks that ext4_map_blocks() will ever try to map to 2**31 - 1. In practice this should never get hit, except by someone deliberately trying to provke the above-described bug. Thanks to the PaX team for asking whethre this could possibly happen in some off-line discussions about using some static code checking technology they are developing to find bugs in kernel code. Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2014-02-20 12:54:05 -05:00
ext4: fix data corruption caused by unwritten and delayed extents Currently it is possible to lose whole file system block worth of data when we hit the specific interaction with unwritten and delayed extents in status extent tree. The problem is that when we insert delayed extent into extent status tree the only way to get rid of it is when we write out delayed buffer. However there is a limitation in the extent status tree implementation so that when inserting unwritten extent should there be even a single delayed block the whole unwritten extent would be marked as delayed. At this point, there is no way to get rid of the delayed extents, because there are no delayed buffers to write out. So when a we write into said unwritten extent we will convert it to written, but it still remains delayed. When we try to write into that block later ext4_da_map_blocks() will set the buffer new and delayed and map it to invalid block which causes the rest of the block to be zeroed loosing already written data. For now we can fix this by simply not allowing to set delayed status on written extent in the extent status tree. Also add WARN_ON() to make sure that we notice if this happens in the future. This problem can be easily reproduced by running the following xfs_io. xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 4096 2048" \ -c "falloc 0 131072" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 65536 2048" \ -c "fsync" /mnt/test/fff echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xdd 67584 2048" /mnt/test/fff This can be theoretically also reproduced by at random by running fsx, but it's not very reliable, though on machines with bigger page size (like ppc) this can be seen more often (especially xfstest generic/127) Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-05-02 21:36:55 -04:00
ext4: fix data corruption caused by unwritten and delayed extents Currently it is possible to lose whole file system block worth of data when we hit the specific interaction with unwritten and delayed extents in status extent tree. The problem is that when we insert delayed extent into extent status tree the only way to get rid of it is when we write out delayed buffer. However there is a limitation in the extent status tree implementation so that when inserting unwritten extent should there be even a single delayed block the whole unwritten extent would be marked as delayed. At this point, there is no way to get rid of the delayed extents, because there are no delayed buffers to write out. So when a we write into said unwritten extent we will convert it to written, but it still remains delayed. When we try to write into that block later ext4_da_map_blocks() will set the buffer new and delayed and map it to invalid block which causes the rest of the block to be zeroed loosing already written data. For now we can fix this by simply not allowing to set delayed status on written extent in the extent status tree. Also add WARN_ON() to make sure that we notice if this happens in the future. This problem can be easily reproduced by running the following xfs_io. xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 4096 2048" \ -c "falloc 0 131072" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 65536 2048" \ -c "fsync" /mnt/test/fff echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xdd 67584 2048" /mnt/test/fff This can be theoretically also reproduced by at random by running fsx, but it's not very reliable, though on machines with bigger page size (like ppc) this can be seen more often (especially xfstest generic/127) Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-05-02 21:36:55 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: fix data exposure after a crash Huang has reported that in his powerfail testing he is seeing stale block contents in some of recently allocated blocks although he mounts ext4 in data=ordered mode. After some investigation I have found out that indeed when delayed allocation is used, we don't add inode to transaction's list of inodes needing flushing before commit. Originally we were doing that but commit f3b59291a69d removed the logic with a flawed argument that it is not needed. The problem is that although for delayed allocated blocks we write their contents immediately after allocating them, there is no guarantee that the IO scheduler or device doesn't reorder things and thus transaction allocating blocks and attaching them to inode can reach stable storage before actual block contents. Actually whenever we attach freshly allocated blocks to inode using a written extent, we should add inode to transaction's ordered inode list to make sure we properly wait for block contents to be written before committing the transaction. So that is what we do in this patch. This also handles other cases where stale data exposure was possible - like filling hole via mmap in data=ordered,nodelalloc mode. The only exception to the above rule are extending direct IO writes where blkdev_direct_IO() waits for IO to complete before increasing i_size and thus stale data exposure is not possible. For now we don't complicate the code with optimizing this special case since the overhead is pretty low. In case this is observed to be a performance problem we can always handle it using a special flag to ext4_map_blocks(). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: f3b59291a69d0b734be1fc8be489fef2dd846d3d Reported-by: "HUANG Weller (CM/ESW12-CN)" <Weller.Huang@cn.bosch.com> Tested-by: "HUANG Weller (CM/ESW12-CN)" <Weller.Huang@cn.bosch.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2016-04-24 00:56:03 -04:00
ext4: fix data exposure after a crash Huang has reported that in his powerfail testing he is seeing stale block contents in some of recently allocated blocks although he mounts ext4 in data=ordered mode. After some investigation I have found out that indeed when delayed allocation is used, we don't add inode to transaction's list of inodes needing flushing before commit. Originally we were doing that but commit f3b59291a69d removed the logic with a flawed argument that it is not needed. The problem is that although for delayed allocated blocks we write their contents immediately after allocating them, there is no guarantee that the IO scheduler or device doesn't reorder things and thus transaction allocating blocks and attaching them to inode can reach stable storage before actual block contents. Actually whenever we attach freshly allocated blocks to inode using a written extent, we should add inode to transaction's ordered inode list to make sure we properly wait for block contents to be written before committing the transaction. So that is what we do in this patch. This also handles other cases where stale data exposure was possible - like filling hole via mmap in data=ordered,nodelalloc mode. The only exception to the above rule are extending direct IO writes where blkdev_direct_IO() waits for IO to complete before increasing i_size and thus stale data exposure is not possible. For now we don't complicate the code with optimizing this special case since the overhead is pretty low. In case this is observed to be a performance problem we can always handle it using a special flag to ext4_map_blocks(). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: f3b59291a69d0b734be1fc8be489fef2dd846d3d Reported-by: "HUANG Weller (CM/ESW12-CN)" <Weller.Huang@cn.bosch.com> Tested-by: "HUANG Weller (CM/ESW12-CN)" <Weller.Huang@cn.bosch.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2016-04-24 00:56:03 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix reservation release on invalidatepage for delalloc fs On delalloc enabled file system on invalidatepage operation in ext4_da_page_release_reservation() we want to clear the delayed buffer and remove the extent covering the delayed buffer from the extent status tree. However currently there is a bug where on the systems with page size > block size we will always remove extents from the start of the page regardless where the actual delayed buffers are positioned in the page. This leads to the errors like this: EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_da_release_space:1225: ext4_da_release_space: ino 13, to_free 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks This however can cause data loss on writeback time if the file system is in ENOSPC condition because we're releasing reservation for someones else delayed buffer. Fix this by only removing extents that corresponds to the part of the page we want to invalidate. This problem is reproducible by the following fio receipt (however I was only able to reproduce it with fio-2.1 or older. [global] bs=8k iodepth=1024 iodepth_batch=60 randrepeat=1 size=1m directory=/mnt/test numjobs=20 [job1] ioengine=sync bs=1k direct=1 rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job2] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job3] bs=1k ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job5] bs=1k ioengine=sync rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job7] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job8] ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job10] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite bs=1k filename=file1:file2 [job11] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-07-03 21:13:55 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix reservation release on invalidatepage for delalloc fs On delalloc enabled file system on invalidatepage operation in ext4_da_page_release_reservation() we want to clear the delayed buffer and remove the extent covering the delayed buffer from the extent status tree. However currently there is a bug where on the systems with page size > block size we will always remove extents from the start of the page regardless where the actual delayed buffers are positioned in the page. This leads to the errors like this: EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_da_release_space:1225: ext4_da_release_space: ino 13, to_free 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks This however can cause data loss on writeback time if the file system is in ENOSPC condition because we're releasing reservation for someones else delayed buffer. Fix this by only removing extents that corresponds to the part of the page we want to invalidate. This problem is reproducible by the following fio receipt (however I was only able to reproduce it with fio-2.1 or older. [global] bs=8k iodepth=1024 iodepth_batch=60 randrepeat=1 size=1m directory=/mnt/test numjobs=20 [job1] ioengine=sync bs=1k direct=1 rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job2] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job3] bs=1k ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job5] bs=1k ioengine=sync rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job7] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job8] ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job10] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite bs=1k filename=file1:file2 [job11] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-07-03 21:13:55 -04:00
ext4: fix reservation release on invalidatepage for delalloc fs On delalloc enabled file system on invalidatepage operation in ext4_da_page_release_reservation() we want to clear the delayed buffer and remove the extent covering the delayed buffer from the extent status tree. However currently there is a bug where on the systems with page size > block size we will always remove extents from the start of the page regardless where the actual delayed buffers are positioned in the page. This leads to the errors like this: EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_da_release_space:1225: ext4_da_release_space: ino 13, to_free 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks This however can cause data loss on writeback time if the file system is in ENOSPC condition because we're releasing reservation for someones else delayed buffer. Fix this by only removing extents that corresponds to the part of the page we want to invalidate. This problem is reproducible by the following fio receipt (however I was only able to reproduce it with fio-2.1 or older. [global] bs=8k iodepth=1024 iodepth_batch=60 randrepeat=1 size=1m directory=/mnt/test numjobs=20 [job1] ioengine=sync bs=1k direct=1 rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job2] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job3] bs=1k ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job5] bs=1k ioengine=sync rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job7] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job8] ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job10] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite bs=1k filename=file1:file2 [job11] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-07-03 21:13:55 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix reservation release on invalidatepage for delalloc fs On delalloc enabled file system on invalidatepage operation in ext4_da_page_release_reservation() we want to clear the delayed buffer and remove the extent covering the delayed buffer from the extent status tree. However currently there is a bug where on the systems with page size > block size we will always remove extents from the start of the page regardless where the actual delayed buffers are positioned in the page. This leads to the errors like this: EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_da_release_space:1225: ext4_da_release_space: ino 13, to_free 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks This however can cause data loss on writeback time if the file system is in ENOSPC condition because we're releasing reservation for someones else delayed buffer. Fix this by only removing extents that corresponds to the part of the page we want to invalidate. This problem is reproducible by the following fio receipt (however I was only able to reproduce it with fio-2.1 or older. [global] bs=8k iodepth=1024 iodepth_batch=60 randrepeat=1 size=1m directory=/mnt/test numjobs=20 [job1] ioengine=sync bs=1k direct=1 rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job2] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job3] bs=1k ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job5] bs=1k ioengine=sync rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job7] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job8] ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job10] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite bs=1k filename=file1:file2 [job11] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-07-03 21:13:55 -04:00
ext4: fix reservation release on invalidatepage for delalloc fs On delalloc enabled file system on invalidatepage operation in ext4_da_page_release_reservation() we want to clear the delayed buffer and remove the extent covering the delayed buffer from the extent status tree. However currently there is a bug where on the systems with page size > block size we will always remove extents from the start of the page regardless where the actual delayed buffers are positioned in the page. This leads to the errors like this: EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_da_release_space:1225: ext4_da_release_space: ino 13, to_free 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks This however can cause data loss on writeback time if the file system is in ENOSPC condition because we're releasing reservation for someones else delayed buffer. Fix this by only removing extents that corresponds to the part of the page we want to invalidate. This problem is reproducible by the following fio receipt (however I was only able to reproduce it with fio-2.1 or older. [global] bs=8k iodepth=1024 iodepth_batch=60 randrepeat=1 size=1m directory=/mnt/test numjobs=20 [job1] ioengine=sync bs=1k direct=1 rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job2] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job3] bs=1k ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job5] bs=1k ioengine=sync rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job7] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job8] ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job10] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite bs=1k filename=file1:file2 [job11] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-07-03 21:13:55 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix reservation release on invalidatepage for delalloc fs On delalloc enabled file system on invalidatepage operation in ext4_da_page_release_reservation() we want to clear the delayed buffer and remove the extent covering the delayed buffer from the extent status tree. However currently there is a bug where on the systems with page size > block size we will always remove extents from the start of the page regardless where the actual delayed buffers are positioned in the page. This leads to the errors like this: EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_da_release_space:1225: ext4_da_release_space: ino 13, to_free 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks This however can cause data loss on writeback time if the file system is in ENOSPC condition because we're releasing reservation for someones else delayed buffer. Fix this by only removing extents that corresponds to the part of the page we want to invalidate. This problem is reproducible by the following fio receipt (however I was only able to reproduce it with fio-2.1 or older. [global] bs=8k iodepth=1024 iodepth_batch=60 randrepeat=1 size=1m directory=/mnt/test numjobs=20 [job1] ioengine=sync bs=1k direct=1 rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job2] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job3] bs=1k ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 [job5] bs=1k ioengine=sync rw=randread filename=file1:file2 [job7] ioengine=libaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job8] ioengine=posixaio rw=randwrite filename=file1:file2 [job10] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite bs=1k filename=file1:file2 [job11] ioengine=mmap rw=randwrite direct=1 filename=file1:file2 Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-07-03 21:13:55 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: attempt to fix race in bigalloc code path Currently, there exists a race between delayed allocated writes and the writeback when bigalloc feature is in use. The race was because we wanted to determine what blocks in a cluster are under delayed allocation and we were using buffer_delayed(bh) check for it. But, the writeback codepath clears this bit without any synchronization which resulted in a race and an ext4 warning similar to: EXT4-fs (ram1): ext4_da_update_reserve_space: ino 13, used 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks The race existed in two places. (1) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_map_blocks() when called from writeback code path. (2) between ext4_find_delalloc_range() and ext4_da_get_block_prep() (where buffer_delayed(bh) is set. To fix (1), this patch introduces a new buffer_head state bit - BH_Da_Mapped. This bit is set under the protection of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem when we have actually mapped the delayed allocated blocks during the writeout time. We can now reliably check for this bit inside ext4_find_delalloc_range() to determine whether the reservation for the blocks have already been claimed or not. To fix (2), it was necessary to set buffer_delay(bh) under the protection of i_data_sem. So, I extracted the very beginning of ext4_map_blocks into a new function - ext4_da_map_blocks() - and performed the required setting of bh_delay bit and the quota reservation under the protection of i_data_sem. These two fixes makes the checking of buffer_delay(bh) and buffer_da_mapped(bh) consistent, thus removing the race. Tested: I was able to reproduce the problem by running 'dd' and 'fsync' in parallel. Also, xfstests sometimes used to reproduce this race. After the fix both my test and xfstests were successful and no race (warning message) was observed. Google-Bug-Id: 4997027 Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2011-09-09 19:20:51 -04:00
ext4: fix race between truncate and __ext4_journalled_writepage() The commit cf108bca465d: "ext4: Invert the locking order of page_lock and transaction start" caused __ext4_journalled_writepage() to drop the page lock before the page was written back, as part of changing the locking order to jbd2_journal_start -> page_lock. However, this introduced a potential race if there was a truncate racing with the data=journalled writeback mode. Fix this by grabbing the page lock after starting the journal handle, and then checking to see if page had gotten truncated out from under us. This fixes a number of different warnings or BUG_ON's when running xfstests generic/086 in data=journalled mode, including: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata: vdc-8: bad jh for block 115643: transaction (ee3fe7 c0, 164), jh->b_transaction ( (null), 0), jh->b_next_transaction ( (null), 0), jlist 0 - and - kernel BUG at /usr/projects/linux/ext4/fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2200! ... Call Trace: [<c02b2ded>] ? __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x117/0x117 [<c02b2de5>] __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x10f/0x117 [<c02b2ded>] ? __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x117/0x117 [<c027d883>] ? lock_buffer+0x36/0x36 [<c02b2dfa>] ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0xd/0x22 [<c0229139>] do_invalidatepage+0x22/0x26 [<c0229198>] truncate_inode_page+0x5b/0x85 [<c022934b>] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x156/0x38c [<c0229592>] truncate_inode_pages+0x11/0x15 [<c022962d>] truncate_pagecache+0x55/0x71 [<c02b913b>] ext4_setattr+0x4a9/0x560 [<c01ca542>] ? current_kernel_time+0x10/0x44 [<c026c4d8>] notify_change+0x1c7/0x2be [<c0256a00>] do_truncate+0x65/0x85 [<c0226f31>] ? file_ra_state_init+0x12/0x29 - and - WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1331 at /usr/projects/linux/ext4/fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1396 irty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae() ... Call Trace: [<c01b879f>] ? console_unlock+0x3a1/0x3ce [<c082cbb4>] dump_stack+0x48/0x60 [<c0178b65>] warn_slowpath_common+0x89/0xa0 [<c02ef2cf>] ? jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae [<c0178bef>] warn_slowpath_null+0x14/0x18 [<c02ef2cf>] jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae [<c02d8615>] __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0xd4/0x19d [<c02b2f44>] write_end_fn+0x40/0x53 [<c02b4a16>] ext4_walk_page_buffers+0x4e/0x6a [<c02b59e7>] ext4_writepage+0x354/0x3b8 [<c02b2f04>] ? mpage_release_unused_pages+0xd4/0xd4 [<c02b1b21>] ? wait_on_buffer+0x2c/0x2c [<c02b5a4b>] ? ext4_writepage+0x3b8/0x3b8 [<c02b5a5b>] __writepage+0x10/0x2e [<c0225956>] write_cache_pages+0x22d/0x32c [<c02b5a4b>] ? ext4_writepage+0x3b8/0x3b8 [<c02b6ee8>] ext4_writepages+0x102/0x607 [<c019adfe>] ? sched_clock_local+0x10/0x10e [<c01a8a7c>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c01a8ad5>] ? lock_is_held+0x43/0x51 [<c0226dff>] do_writepages+0x1c/0x29 [<c0276bed>] __writeback_single_inode+0xc3/0x545 [<c0277c07>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x21f/0x36d ... Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-06-12 23:45:33 -04:00
ext4: fix race between truncate and __ext4_journalled_writepage() The commit cf108bca465d: "ext4: Invert the locking order of page_lock and transaction start" caused __ext4_journalled_writepage() to drop the page lock before the page was written back, as part of changing the locking order to jbd2_journal_start -> page_lock. However, this introduced a potential race if there was a truncate racing with the data=journalled writeback mode. Fix this by grabbing the page lock after starting the journal handle, and then checking to see if page had gotten truncated out from under us. This fixes a number of different warnings or BUG_ON's when running xfstests generic/086 in data=journalled mode, including: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata: vdc-8: bad jh for block 115643: transaction (ee3fe7 c0, 164), jh->b_transaction ( (null), 0), jh->b_next_transaction ( (null), 0), jlist 0 - and - kernel BUG at /usr/projects/linux/ext4/fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2200! ... Call Trace: [<c02b2ded>] ? __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x117/0x117 [<c02b2de5>] __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x10f/0x117 [<c02b2ded>] ? __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x117/0x117 [<c027d883>] ? lock_buffer+0x36/0x36 [<c02b2dfa>] ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0xd/0x22 [<c0229139>] do_invalidatepage+0x22/0x26 [<c0229198>] truncate_inode_page+0x5b/0x85 [<c022934b>] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x156/0x38c [<c0229592>] truncate_inode_pages+0x11/0x15 [<c022962d>] truncate_pagecache+0x55/0x71 [<c02b913b>] ext4_setattr+0x4a9/0x560 [<c01ca542>] ? current_kernel_time+0x10/0x44 [<c026c4d8>] notify_change+0x1c7/0x2be [<c0256a00>] do_truncate+0x65/0x85 [<c0226f31>] ? file_ra_state_init+0x12/0x29 - and - WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1331 at /usr/projects/linux/ext4/fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1396 irty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae() ... Call Trace: [<c01b879f>] ? console_unlock+0x3a1/0x3ce [<c082cbb4>] dump_stack+0x48/0x60 [<c0178b65>] warn_slowpath_common+0x89/0xa0 [<c02ef2cf>] ? jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae [<c0178bef>] warn_slowpath_null+0x14/0x18 [<c02ef2cf>] jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae [<c02d8615>] __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0xd4/0x19d [<c02b2f44>] write_end_fn+0x40/0x53 [<c02b4a16>] ext4_walk_page_buffers+0x4e/0x6a [<c02b59e7>] ext4_writepage+0x354/0x3b8 [<c02b2f04>] ? mpage_release_unused_pages+0xd4/0xd4 [<c02b1b21>] ? wait_on_buffer+0x2c/0x2c [<c02b5a4b>] ? ext4_writepage+0x3b8/0x3b8 [<c02b5a5b>] __writepage+0x10/0x2e [<c0225956>] write_cache_pages+0x22d/0x32c [<c02b5a4b>] ? ext4_writepage+0x3b8/0x3b8 [<c02b6ee8>] ext4_writepages+0x102/0x607 [<c019adfe>] ? sched_clock_local+0x10/0x10e [<c01a8a7c>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c01a8ad5>] ? lock_is_held+0x43/0x51 [<c0226dff>] do_writepages+0x1c/0x29 [<c0276bed>] __writeback_single_inode+0xc3/0x545 [<c0277c07>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x21f/0x36d ... Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-06-12 23:45:33 -04:00
ext4: fix race between truncate and __ext4_journalled_writepage() The commit cf108bca465d: "ext4: Invert the locking order of page_lock and transaction start" caused __ext4_journalled_writepage() to drop the page lock before the page was written back, as part of changing the locking order to jbd2_journal_start -> page_lock. However, this introduced a potential race if there was a truncate racing with the data=journalled writeback mode. Fix this by grabbing the page lock after starting the journal handle, and then checking to see if page had gotten truncated out from under us. This fixes a number of different warnings or BUG_ON's when running xfstests generic/086 in data=journalled mode, including: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata: vdc-8: bad jh for block 115643: transaction (ee3fe7 c0, 164), jh->b_transaction ( (null), 0), jh->b_next_transaction ( (null), 0), jlist 0 - and - kernel BUG at /usr/projects/linux/ext4/fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2200! ... Call Trace: [<c02b2ded>] ? __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x117/0x117 [<c02b2de5>] __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x10f/0x117 [<c02b2ded>] ? __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x117/0x117 [<c027d883>] ? lock_buffer+0x36/0x36 [<c02b2dfa>] ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0xd/0x22 [<c0229139>] do_invalidatepage+0x22/0x26 [<c0229198>] truncate_inode_page+0x5b/0x85 [<c022934b>] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x156/0x38c [<c0229592>] truncate_inode_pages+0x11/0x15 [<c022962d>] truncate_pagecache+0x55/0x71 [<c02b913b>] ext4_setattr+0x4a9/0x560 [<c01ca542>] ? current_kernel_time+0x10/0x44 [<c026c4d8>] notify_change+0x1c7/0x2be [<c0256a00>] do_truncate+0x65/0x85 [<c0226f31>] ? file_ra_state_init+0x12/0x29 - and - WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1331 at /usr/projects/linux/ext4/fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1396 irty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae() ... Call Trace: [<c01b879f>] ? console_unlock+0x3a1/0x3ce [<c082cbb4>] dump_stack+0x48/0x60 [<c0178b65>] warn_slowpath_common+0x89/0xa0 [<c02ef2cf>] ? jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae [<c0178bef>] warn_slowpath_null+0x14/0x18 [<c02ef2cf>] jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae [<c02d8615>] __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0xd4/0x19d [<c02b2f44>] write_end_fn+0x40/0x53 [<c02b4a16>] ext4_walk_page_buffers+0x4e/0x6a [<c02b59e7>] ext4_writepage+0x354/0x3b8 [<c02b2f04>] ? mpage_release_unused_pages+0xd4/0xd4 [<c02b1b21>] ? wait_on_buffer+0x2c/0x2c [<c02b5a4b>] ? ext4_writepage+0x3b8/0x3b8 [<c02b5a5b>] __writepage+0x10/0x2e [<c0225956>] write_cache_pages+0x22d/0x32c [<c02b5a4b>] ? ext4_writepage+0x3b8/0x3b8 [<c02b6ee8>] ext4_writepages+0x102/0x607 [<c019adfe>] ? sched_clock_local+0x10/0x10e [<c01a8a7c>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c01a8ad5>] ? lock_is_held+0x43/0x51 [<c0226dff>] do_writepages+0x1c/0x29 [<c0276bed>] __writeback_single_inode+0xc3/0x545 [<c0277c07>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x21f/0x36d ... Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-06-12 23:45:33 -04:00
ext4: fix race between truncate and __ext4_journalled_writepage() The commit cf108bca465d: "ext4: Invert the locking order of page_lock and transaction start" caused __ext4_journalled_writepage() to drop the page lock before the page was written back, as part of changing the locking order to jbd2_journal_start -> page_lock. However, this introduced a potential race if there was a truncate racing with the data=journalled writeback mode. Fix this by grabbing the page lock after starting the journal handle, and then checking to see if page had gotten truncated out from under us. This fixes a number of different warnings or BUG_ON's when running xfstests generic/086 in data=journalled mode, including: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata: vdc-8: bad jh for block 115643: transaction (ee3fe7 c0, 164), jh->b_transaction ( (null), 0), jh->b_next_transaction ( (null), 0), jlist 0 - and - kernel BUG at /usr/projects/linux/ext4/fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2200! ... Call Trace: [<c02b2ded>] ? __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x117/0x117 [<c02b2de5>] __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x10f/0x117 [<c02b2ded>] ? __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0x117/0x117 [<c027d883>] ? lock_buffer+0x36/0x36 [<c02b2dfa>] ext4_journalled_invalidatepage+0xd/0x22 [<c0229139>] do_invalidatepage+0x22/0x26 [<c0229198>] truncate_inode_page+0x5b/0x85 [<c022934b>] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x156/0x38c [<c0229592>] truncate_inode_pages+0x11/0x15 [<c022962d>] truncate_pagecache+0x55/0x71 [<c02b913b>] ext4_setattr+0x4a9/0x560 [<c01ca542>] ? current_kernel_time+0x10/0x44 [<c026c4d8>] notify_change+0x1c7/0x2be [<c0256a00>] do_truncate+0x65/0x85 [<c0226f31>] ? file_ra_state_init+0x12/0x29 - and - WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1331 at /usr/projects/linux/ext4/fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1396 irty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae() ... Call Trace: [<c01b879f>] ? console_unlock+0x3a1/0x3ce [<c082cbb4>] dump_stack+0x48/0x60 [<c0178b65>] warn_slowpath_common+0x89/0xa0 [<c02ef2cf>] ? jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae [<c0178bef>] warn_slowpath_null+0x14/0x18 [<c02ef2cf>] jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x14a/0x1ae [<c02d8615>] __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0xd4/0x19d [<c02b2f44>] write_end_fn+0x40/0x53 [<c02b4a16>] ext4_walk_page_buffers+0x4e/0x6a [<c02b59e7>] ext4_writepage+0x354/0x3b8 [<c02b2f04>] ? mpage_release_unused_pages+0xd4/0xd4 [<c02b1b21>] ? wait_on_buffer+0x2c/0x2c [<c02b5a4b>] ? ext4_writepage+0x3b8/0x3b8 [<c02b5a5b>] __writepage+0x10/0x2e [<c0225956>] write_cache_pages+0x22d/0x32c [<c02b5a4b>] ? ext4_writepage+0x3b8/0x3b8 [<c02b6ee8>] ext4_writepages+0x102/0x607 [<c019adfe>] ? sched_clock_local+0x10/0x10e [<c01a8a7c>] ? __lock_is_held+0x2e/0x44 [<c01a8ad5>] ? lock_is_held+0x43/0x51 [<c0226dff>] do_writepages+0x1c/0x29 [<c0276bed>] __writeback_single_inode+0xc3/0x545 [<c0277c07>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x21f/0x36d ... Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2015-06-12 23:45:33 -04:00
ext4: fix data integrity sync in ordered mode When we perform a data integrity sync we tag all the dirty pages with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE at start of ext4_da_writepages. Later we check for this tag in write_cache_pages_da and creates a struct mpage_da_data containing contiguously indexed pages tagged with this tag and sync these pages with a call to mpage_da_map_and_submit. This process is done in while loop until all the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE pages are synced. We also do journal start and stop in each iteration. journal_stop could initiate journal commit which would call ext4_writepage which in turn will call ext4_bio_write_page even for delayed OR unwritten buffers. When ext4_bio_write_page is called for such buffers, even though it does not sync them but it clears the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE of the corresponding page and hence these pages are also not synced by the currently running data integrity sync. We will end up with dirty pages although sync is completed. This could cause a potential data loss when the sync call is followed by a truncate_pagecache call, which is exactly the case in collapse_range. (It will cause generic/127 failure in xfstests) To avoid this issue, we can use set_page_writeback_keepwrite instead of set_page_writeback, which doesn't clear TOWRITE tag. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2014-05-12 08:12:25 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix data integrity sync in ordered mode When we perform a data integrity sync we tag all the dirty pages with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE at start of ext4_da_writepages. Later we check for this tag in write_cache_pages_da and creates a struct mpage_da_data containing contiguously indexed pages tagged with this tag and sync these pages with a call to mpage_da_map_and_submit. This process is done in while loop until all the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE pages are synced. We also do journal start and stop in each iteration. journal_stop could initiate journal commit which would call ext4_writepage which in turn will call ext4_bio_write_page even for delayed OR unwritten buffers. When ext4_bio_write_page is called for such buffers, even though it does not sync them but it clears the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE of the corresponding page and hence these pages are also not synced by the currently running data integrity sync. We will end up with dirty pages although sync is completed. This could cause a potential data loss when the sync call is followed by a truncate_pagecache call, which is exactly the case in collapse_range. (It will cause generic/127 failure in xfstests) To avoid this issue, we can use set_page_writeback_keepwrite instead of set_page_writeback, which doesn't clear TOWRITE tag. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2014-05-12 08:12:25 -04:00
ext4: fix data integrity sync in ordered mode When we perform a data integrity sync we tag all the dirty pages with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE at start of ext4_da_writepages. Later we check for this tag in write_cache_pages_da and creates a struct mpage_da_data containing contiguously indexed pages tagged with this tag and sync these pages with a call to mpage_da_map_and_submit. This process is done in while loop until all the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE pages are synced. We also do journal start and stop in each iteration. journal_stop could initiate journal commit which would call ext4_writepage which in turn will call ext4_bio_write_page even for delayed OR unwritten buffers. When ext4_bio_write_page is called for such buffers, even though it does not sync them but it clears the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE of the corresponding page and hence these pages are also not synced by the currently running data integrity sync. We will end up with dirty pages although sync is completed. This could cause a potential data loss when the sync call is followed by a truncate_pagecache call, which is exactly the case in collapse_range. (It will cause generic/127 failure in xfstests) To avoid this issue, we can use set_page_writeback_keepwrite instead of set_page_writeback, which doesn't clear TOWRITE tag. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2014-05-12 08:12:25 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix data integrity sync in ordered mode When we perform a data integrity sync we tag all the dirty pages with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE at start of ext4_da_writepages. Later we check for this tag in write_cache_pages_da and creates a struct mpage_da_data containing contiguously indexed pages tagged with this tag and sync these pages with a call to mpage_da_map_and_submit. This process is done in while loop until all the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE pages are synced. We also do journal start and stop in each iteration. journal_stop could initiate journal commit which would call ext4_writepage which in turn will call ext4_bio_write_page even for delayed OR unwritten buffers. When ext4_bio_write_page is called for such buffers, even though it does not sync them but it clears the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE of the corresponding page and hence these pages are also not synced by the currently running data integrity sync. We will end up with dirty pages although sync is completed. This could cause a potential data loss when the sync call is followed by a truncate_pagecache call, which is exactly the case in collapse_range. (It will cause generic/127 failure in xfstests) To avoid this issue, we can use set_page_writeback_keepwrite instead of set_page_writeback, which doesn't clear TOWRITE tag. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2014-05-12 08:12:25 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix potential deadlock in ext4_nonda_switch() In ext4_nonda_switch(), if the file system is getting full we used to call writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle(). The problem is that we can be holding i_mutex already, and this causes a potential deadlock when writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle() when it tries to take s_umount. (See lockdep output below). As it turns out we don't need need to hold s_umount; the fact that we are in the middle of the write(2) system call will keep the superblock pinned. Unfortunately writeback_inodes_sb() checks to make sure s_umount is taken, and the VFS uses a different mechanism for making sure the file system doesn't get unmounted out from under us. The simplest way of dealing with this is to just simply grab s_umount using a trylock, and skip kicking the writeback flusher thread in the very unlikely case that we can't take a read lock on s_umount without blocking. Also, we now check the cirteria for kicking the writeback thread before we decide to whether to fall back to non-delayed writeback, so if there are any outstanding delayed allocation writes, we try to get them resolved as soon as possible. [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.6.0-rc1-00042-gce894ca #367 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- dd/8298 is trying to acquire lock: (&type->s_umount_key#18){++++..}, at: [<c02277d4>] writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46 but task is already holding lock: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+...}, at: [<c01ddcce>] generic_file_aio_write+0x5f/0xd3 which lock already depends on the new lock. 2 locks held by dd/8298: #0: (sb_writers#2){.+.+.+}, at: [<c01ddcc5>] generic_file_aio_write+0x56/0xd3 #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+...}, at: [<c01ddcce>] generic_file_aio_write+0x5f/0xd3 stack backtrace: Pid: 8298, comm: dd Not tainted 3.6.0-rc1-00042-gce894ca #367 Call Trace: [<c015b79c>] ? console_unlock+0x345/0x372 [<c06d62a1>] print_circular_bug+0x190/0x19d [<c019906c>] __lock_acquire+0x86d/0xb6c [<c01999db>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5c/0x7b [<c0199724>] lock_acquire+0x66/0xb9 [<c02277d4>] ? writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46 [<c06db935>] down_read+0x28/0x58 [<c02277d4>] ? writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46 [<c02277d4>] writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46 [<c026f3b2>] ext4_nonda_switch+0xe1/0xf4 [<c0271ece>] ext4_da_write_begin+0x27/0x193 [<c01dcdb0>] generic_file_buffered_write+0xc8/0x1bb [<c01ddc47>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x1dd/0x205 [<c01ddce7>] generic_file_aio_write+0x78/0xd3 [<c026d336>] ext4_file_write+0x480/0x4a6 [<c0198c1d>] ? __lock_acquire+0x41e/0xb6c [<c0180944>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x11a/0x13e [<c01967e9>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [<c018099f>] ? local_clock+0x37/0x4e [<c0209f2c>] do_sync_write+0x67/0x9d [<c0209ec5>] ? wait_on_retry_sync_kiocb+0x44/0x44 [<c020a7b9>] vfs_write+0x7b/0xe6 [<c020a9a6>] sys_write+0x3b/0x64 [<c06dd4bd>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2012-09-19 22:42:36 -04:00
ext4: fix potential deadlock in ext4_nonda_switch() In ext4_nonda_switch(), if the file system is getting full we used to call writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle(). The problem is that we can be holding i_mutex already, and this causes a potential deadlock when writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle() when it tries to take s_umount. (See lockdep output below). As it turns out we don't need need to hold s_umount; the fact that we are in the middle of the write(2) system call will keep the superblock pinned. Unfortunately writeback_inodes_sb() checks to make sure s_umount is taken, and the VFS uses a different mechanism for making sure the file system doesn't get unmounted out from under us. The simplest way of dealing with this is to just simply grab s_umount using a trylock, and skip kicking the writeback flusher thread in the very unlikely case that we can't take a read lock on s_umount without blocking. Also, we now check the cirteria for kicking the writeback thread before we decide to whether to fall back to non-delayed writeback, so if there are any outstanding delayed allocation writes, we try to get them resolved as soon as possible. [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.6.0-rc1-00042-gce894ca #367 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- dd/8298 is trying to acquire lock: (&type->s_umount_key#18){++++..}, at: [<c02277d4>] writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46 but task is already holding lock: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+...}, at: [<c01ddcce>] generic_file_aio_write+0x5f/0xd3 which lock already depends on the new lock. 2 locks held by dd/8298: #0: (sb_writers#2){.+.+.+}, at: [<c01ddcc5>] generic_file_aio_write+0x56/0xd3 #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+...}, at: [<c01ddcce>] generic_file_aio_write+0x5f/0xd3 stack backtrace: Pid: 8298, comm: dd Not tainted 3.6.0-rc1-00042-gce894ca #367 Call Trace: [<c015b79c>] ? console_unlock+0x345/0x372 [<c06d62a1>] print_circular_bug+0x190/0x19d [<c019906c>] __lock_acquire+0x86d/0xb6c [<c01999db>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5c/0x7b [<c0199724>] lock_acquire+0x66/0xb9 [<c02277d4>] ? writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46 [<c06db935>] down_read+0x28/0x58 [<c02277d4>] ? writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46 [<c02277d4>] writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle+0x28/0x46 [<c026f3b2>] ext4_nonda_switch+0xe1/0xf4 [<c0271ece>] ext4_da_write_begin+0x27/0x193 [<c01dcdb0>] generic_file_buffered_write+0xc8/0x1bb [<c01ddc47>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x1dd/0x205 [<c01ddce7>] generic_file_aio_write+0x78/0xd3 [<c026d336>] ext4_file_write+0x480/0x4a6 [<c0198c1d>] ? __lock_acquire+0x41e/0xb6c [<c0180944>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x11a/0x13e [<c01967e9>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [<c018099f>] ? local_clock+0x37/0x4e [<c0209f2c>] do_sync_write+0x67/0x9d [<c0209ec5>] ? wait_on_retry_sync_kiocb+0x44/0x44 [<c020a7b9>] vfs_write+0x7b/0xe6 [<c020a9a6>] sys_write+0x3b/0x64 [<c06dd4bd>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2012-09-19 22:42:36 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: fix delalloc i_disksize early update issue Ext4_da_write_end() used walk_page_buffers() with a callback function of ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to check if it extended the file size without allocating any blocks (since in this case i_disksize needs to be updated). However, this is didn't work proprely because the buffer head has not been marked dirty yet --- this is done later in block_commit_write() --- which caused ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to always return false. In addition, walk_page_buffers() checks all of the buffer heads covering the page, and the only buffer_head that should be checked is the one covering the end of the write. Otherwise, given a 1k blocksize filesystem and a 4k page size, the buffer head covering the first 1k stripe of the file could be unmapped (because it was a sparse file), and the second or third buffer_head covering that page could be mapped, and using walk_page_buffers() would fail in this case since it would stop at the first unmapped buffer_head and return true. The core problem is that walk_page_buffers() was intended to do work in a callback function, and a non-zero return value indicated a failure, which termined the walk of the buffer heads covering the page. It was not intended to be used with a boolean function, such as ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay(). Add addtional fix from Aneesh to protect i_disksize update rave with truncate. Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2008-07-11 19:27:31 -04:00
ext4: fix delalloc i_disksize early update issue Ext4_da_write_end() used walk_page_buffers() with a callback function of ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to check if it extended the file size without allocating any blocks (since in this case i_disksize needs to be updated). However, this is didn't work proprely because the buffer head has not been marked dirty yet --- this is done later in block_commit_write() --- which caused ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to always return false. In addition, walk_page_buffers() checks all of the buffer heads covering the page, and the only buffer_head that should be checked is the one covering the end of the write. Otherwise, given a 1k blocksize filesystem and a 4k page size, the buffer head covering the first 1k stripe of the file could be unmapped (because it was a sparse file), and the second or third buffer_head covering that page could be mapped, and using walk_page_buffers() would fail in this case since it would stop at the first unmapped buffer_head and return true. The core problem is that walk_page_buffers() was intended to do work in a callback function, and a non-zero return value indicated a failure, which termined the walk of the buffer heads covering the page. It was not intended to be used with a boolean function, such as ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay(). Add addtional fix from Aneesh to protect i_disksize update rave with truncate. Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2008-07-11 19:27:31 -04:00
ext4: fix delalloc i_disksize early update issue Ext4_da_write_end() used walk_page_buffers() with a callback function of ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to check if it extended the file size without allocating any blocks (since in this case i_disksize needs to be updated). However, this is didn't work proprely because the buffer head has not been marked dirty yet --- this is done later in block_commit_write() --- which caused ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to always return false. In addition, walk_page_buffers() checks all of the buffer heads covering the page, and the only buffer_head that should be checked is the one covering the end of the write. Otherwise, given a 1k blocksize filesystem and a 4k page size, the buffer head covering the first 1k stripe of the file could be unmapped (because it was a sparse file), and the second or third buffer_head covering that page could be mapped, and using walk_page_buffers() would fail in this case since it would stop at the first unmapped buffer_head and return true. The core problem is that walk_page_buffers() was intended to do work in a callback function, and a non-zero return value indicated a failure, which termined the walk of the buffer heads covering the page. It was not intended to be used with a boolean function, such as ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay(). Add addtional fix from Aneesh to protect i_disksize update rave with truncate. Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2008-07-11 19:27:31 -04:00
ext4: fix delalloc i_disksize early update issue Ext4_da_write_end() used walk_page_buffers() with a callback function of ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to check if it extended the file size without allocating any blocks (since in this case i_disksize needs to be updated). However, this is didn't work proprely because the buffer head has not been marked dirty yet --- this is done later in block_commit_write() --- which caused ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to always return false. In addition, walk_page_buffers() checks all of the buffer heads covering the page, and the only buffer_head that should be checked is the one covering the end of the write. Otherwise, given a 1k blocksize filesystem and a 4k page size, the buffer head covering the first 1k stripe of the file could be unmapped (because it was a sparse file), and the second or third buffer_head covering that page could be mapped, and using walk_page_buffers() would fail in this case since it would stop at the first unmapped buffer_head and return true. The core problem is that walk_page_buffers() was intended to do work in a callback function, and a non-zero return value indicated a failure, which termined the walk of the buffer heads covering the page. It was not intended to be used with a boolean function, such as ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay(). Add addtional fix from Aneesh to protect i_disksize update rave with truncate. Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2008-07-11 19:27:31 -04:00
ext4: fix delalloc i_disksize early update issue Ext4_da_write_end() used walk_page_buffers() with a callback function of ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to check if it extended the file size without allocating any blocks (since in this case i_disksize needs to be updated). However, this is didn't work proprely because the buffer head has not been marked dirty yet --- this is done later in block_commit_write() --- which caused ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to always return false. In addition, walk_page_buffers() checks all of the buffer heads covering the page, and the only buffer_head that should be checked is the one covering the end of the write. Otherwise, given a 1k blocksize filesystem and a 4k page size, the buffer head covering the first 1k stripe of the file could be unmapped (because it was a sparse file), and the second or third buffer_head covering that page could be mapped, and using walk_page_buffers() would fail in this case since it would stop at the first unmapped buffer_head and return true. The core problem is that walk_page_buffers() was intended to do work in a callback function, and a non-zero return value indicated a failure, which termined the walk of the buffer heads covering the page. It was not intended to be used with a boolean function, such as ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay(). Add addtional fix from Aneesh to protect i_disksize update rave with truncate. Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2008-07-11 19:27:31 -04:00
ext4: fix delalloc i_disksize early update issue Ext4_da_write_end() used walk_page_buffers() with a callback function of ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to check if it extended the file size without allocating any blocks (since in this case i_disksize needs to be updated). However, this is didn't work proprely because the buffer head has not been marked dirty yet --- this is done later in block_commit_write() --- which caused ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to always return false. In addition, walk_page_buffers() checks all of the buffer heads covering the page, and the only buffer_head that should be checked is the one covering the end of the write. Otherwise, given a 1k blocksize filesystem and a 4k page size, the buffer head covering the first 1k stripe of the file could be unmapped (because it was a sparse file), and the second or third buffer_head covering that page could be mapped, and using walk_page_buffers() would fail in this case since it would stop at the first unmapped buffer_head and return true. The core problem is that walk_page_buffers() was intended to do work in a callback function, and a non-zero return value indicated a failure, which termined the walk of the buffer heads covering the page. It was not intended to be used with a boolean function, such as ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay(). Add addtional fix from Aneesh to protect i_disksize update rave with truncate. Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2008-07-11 19:27:31 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: avoid hangs in ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize() If the pte mapping in generic_perform_write() is unmapped between iov_iter_fault_in_readable() and iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic(), the "copied" parameter to ->end_write can be zero. ext4 couldn't cope with it with delayed allocations enabled. This skips the i_disksize enlargement logic if copied is zero and no new data was appeneded to the inode. gdb> bt #0 0xffffffff811afe80 in ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize (file=0xffff88003f606a80, mapping=0xffff88001d3824e0, pos=0x1\ 08000, len=0x1000, copied=0x0, page=0xffffea0000d792e8, fsdata=0x0) at fs/ext4/inode.c:2467 #1 ext4_da_write_end (file=0xffff88003f606a80, mapping=0xffff88001d3824e0, pos=0x108000, len=0x1000, copied=0x0, page=0\ xffffea0000d792e8, fsdata=0x0) at fs/ext4/inode.c:2512 #2 0xffffffff810d97f1 in generic_perform_write (iocb=<value optimized out>, iov=<value optimized out>, nr_segs=<value o\ ptimized out>, pos=0x108000, ppos=0xffff88001e26be40, count=<value optimized out>, written=0x0) at mm/filemap.c:2440 #3 generic_file_buffered_write (iocb=<value optimized out>, iov=<value optimized out>, nr_segs=<value optimized out>, p\ os=0x108000, ppos=0xffff88001e26be40, count=<value optimized out>, written=0x0) at mm/filemap.c:2482 #4 0xffffffff810db5d1 in __generic_file_aio_write (iocb=0xffff88001e26bde8, iov=0xffff88001e26bec8, nr_segs=0x1, ppos=0\ xffff88001e26be40) at mm/filemap.c:2600 #5 0xffffffff810db853 in generic_file_aio_write (iocb=0xffff88001e26bde8, iov=0xffff88001e26bec8, nr_segs=<value optimi\ zed out>, pos=<value optimized out>) at mm/filemap.c:2632 #6 0xffffffff811a71aa in ext4_file_write (iocb=0xffff88001e26bde8, iov=0xffff88001e26bec8, nr_segs=0x1, pos=0x108000) a\ t fs/ext4/file.c:136 #7 0xffffffff811375aa in do_sync_write (filp=0xffff88003f606a80, buf=<value optimized out>, len=<value optimized out>, \ ppos=0xffff88001e26bf48) at fs/read_write.c:406 #8 0xffffffff81137e56 in vfs_write (file=0xffff88003f606a80, buf=0x1ec2960 <Address 0x1ec2960 out of bounds>, count=0x4\ 000, pos=0xffff88001e26bf48) at fs/read_write.c:435 #9 0xffffffff8113816c in sys_write (fd=<value optimized out>, buf=0x1ec2960 <Address 0x1ec2960 out of bounds>, count=0x\ 4000) at fs/read_write.c:487 #10 <signal handler called> #11 0x00007f120077a390 in __brk_reservation_fn_dmi_alloc__ () #12 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () gdb> print offset $22 = 0xffffffffffffffff gdb> print idx $23 = 0xffffffff gdb> print inode->i_blkbits $24 = 0xc gdb> up #1 ext4_da_write_end (file=0xffff88003f606a80, mapping=0xffff88001d3824e0, pos=0x108000, len=0x1000, copied=0x0, page=0\ xffffea0000d792e8, fsdata=0x0) at fs/ext4/inode.c:2512 2512 if (ext4_da_should_update_i_disksize(page, end)) { gdb> print start $25 = 0x0 gdb> print end $26 = 0xffffffffffffffff gdb> print pos $27 = 0x108000 gdb> print new_i_size $28 = 0x108000 gdb> print ((struct ext4_inode_info *)((char *)inode-((int)(&((struct ext4_inode_info *)0)->vfs_inode))))->i_disksize $29 = 0xd9000 gdb> down 2467 for (i = 0; i < idx; i++) gdb> print i $30 = 0xd44acbee This is 100% reproducible with some autonuma development code tuned in a very aggressive manner (not normal way even for knumad) which does "exotic" changes to the ptes. It wouldn't normally trigger but I don't see why it can't happen normally if the page is added to swap cache in between the two faults leading to "copied" being zero (which then hangs in ext4). So it should be fixed. Especially possible with lumpy reclaim (albeit disabled if compaction is enabled) as that would ignore the young bits in the ptes. Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
2011-12-13 21:41:15 -05:00
ext4: fix delalloc i_disksize early update issue Ext4_da_write_end() used walk_page_buffers() with a callback function of ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to check if it extended the file size without allocating any blocks (since in this case i_disksize needs to be updated). However, this is didn't work proprely because the buffer head has not been marked dirty yet --- this is done later in block_commit_write() --- which caused ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay() to always return false. In addition, walk_page_buffers() checks all of the buffer heads covering the page, and the only buffer_head that should be checked is the one covering the end of the write. Otherwise, given a 1k blocksize filesystem and a 4k page size, the buffer head covering the first 1k stripe of the file could be unmapped (because it was a sparse file), and the second or third buffer_head covering that page could be mapped, and using walk_page_buffers() would fail in this case since it would stop at the first unmapped buffer_head and return true. The core problem is that walk_page_buffers() was intended to do work in a callback function, and a non-zero return value indicated a failure, which termined the walk of the buffer heads covering the page. It was not intended to be used with a boolean function, such as ext4_bh_unmapped_or_delay(). Add addtional fix from Aneesh to protect i_disksize update rave with truncate. Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2008-07-11 19:27:31 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
Fix a number of bugs, most notably a potential stale data exposure after a crash and a potential BUG_ON crash if a file has the data journalling flag enabled while it has dirty delayed allocation blocks that haven't been written yet. Also fix a potential crash in the new project quota code and a maliciously corrupted file system. In addition, fix some DAX-specific bugs, including when there is a transient ENOSPC situation and races between writes via direct I/O and an mmap'ed segment that could lead to lost I/O. Finally the usual set of miscellaneous cleanups. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJXQ40fAAoJEPL5WVaVDYGjnwMH+wXHASgPfzZgtRInsTG8W/2L jsmAcMlyMAYIATWMppNtPIq0td49z1dYO0YkKhtPVMwfzu230IFWhGWp93WqP9ve XYHMmaBorFlMAzWgMKn1K0ExWZlV+ammmcTKgU0kU4qyZp0G/NnMtlXIkSNv2amI 9Mn6R+v97c20gn8e9HWP/IVWkgPr+WBtEXaSGjC7dL6yI8hL+rJMqN82D76oU5ea vtwzrna/ISijy+etYmQzqHNYNaBKf40+B5HxQZw/Ta3FSHofBwXAyLaeEAr260Mf V3Eg2NDcKQxiZ3adBzIUvrRnrJV381OmHoguo8Frs8YHTTRiZ0T/s7FGr2Q0NYE= =7yIM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o: "Fix a number of bugs, most notably a potential stale data exposure after a crash and a potential BUG_ON crash if a file has the data journalling flag enabled while it has dirty delayed allocation blocks that haven't been written yet. Also fix a potential crash in the new project quota code and a maliciously corrupted file system. In addition, fix some DAX-specific bugs, including when there is a transient ENOSPC situation and races between writes via direct I/O and an mmap'ed segment that could lead to lost I/O. Finally the usual set of miscellaneous cleanups" * tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (23 commits) ext4: pre-zero allocated blocks for DAX IO ext4: refactor direct IO code ext4: fix race in transient ENOSPC detection ext4: handle transient ENOSPC properly for DAX dax: call get_blocks() with create == 1 for write faults to unwritten extents ext4: remove unmeetable inconsisteny check from ext4_find_extent() jbd2: remove excess descriptions for handle_s ext4: remove unnecessary bio get/put ext4: silence UBSAN in ext4_mb_init() ext4: address UBSAN warning in mb_find_order_for_block() ext4: fix oops on corrupted filesystem ext4: fix check of dqget() return value in ext4_ioctl_setproject() ext4: clean up error handling when orphan list is corrupted ext4: fix hang when processing corrupted orphaned inode list ext4: remove trailing \n from ext4_warning/ext4_error calls ext4: fix races between changing inode journal mode and ext4_writepages ext4: handle unwritten or delalloc buffers before enabling data journaling ext4: fix jbd2 handle extension in ext4_ext_truncate_extend_restart() ext4: do not ask jbd2 to write data for delalloc buffers jbd2: add support for avoiding data writes during transaction commits ...
2016-05-24 12:55:26 -07:00
Fix a number of bugs, most notably a potential stale data exposure after a crash and a potential BUG_ON crash if a file has the data journalling flag enabled while it has dirty delayed allocation blocks that haven't been written yet. Also fix a potential crash in the new project quota code and a maliciously corrupted file system. In addition, fix some DAX-specific bugs, including when there is a transient ENOSPC situation and races between writes via direct I/O and an mmap'ed segment that could lead to lost I/O. Finally the usual set of miscellaneous cleanups. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJXQ40fAAoJEPL5WVaVDYGjnwMH+wXHASgPfzZgtRInsTG8W/2L jsmAcMlyMAYIATWMppNtPIq0td49z1dYO0YkKhtPVMwfzu230IFWhGWp93WqP9ve XYHMmaBorFlMAzWgMKn1K0ExWZlV+ammmcTKgU0kU4qyZp0G/NnMtlXIkSNv2amI 9Mn6R+v97c20gn8e9HWP/IVWkgPr+WBtEXaSGjC7dL6yI8hL+rJMqN82D76oU5ea vtwzrna/ISijy+etYmQzqHNYNaBKf40+B5HxQZw/Ta3FSHofBwXAyLaeEAr260Mf V3Eg2NDcKQxiZ3adBzIUvrRnrJV381OmHoguo8Frs8YHTTRiZ0T/s7FGr2Q0NYE= =7yIM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o: "Fix a number of bugs, most notably a potential stale data exposure after a crash and a potential BUG_ON crash if a file has the data journalling flag enabled while it has dirty delayed allocation blocks that haven't been written yet. Also fix a potential crash in the new project quota code and a maliciously corrupted file system. In addition, fix some DAX-specific bugs, including when there is a transient ENOSPC situation and races between writes via direct I/O and an mmap'ed segment that could lead to lost I/O. Finally the usual set of miscellaneous cleanups" * tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (23 commits) ext4: pre-zero allocated blocks for DAX IO ext4: refactor direct IO code ext4: fix race in transient ENOSPC detection ext4: handle transient ENOSPC properly for DAX dax: call get_blocks() with create == 1 for write faults to unwritten extents ext4: remove unmeetable inconsisteny check from ext4_find_extent() jbd2: remove excess descriptions for handle_s ext4: remove unnecessary bio get/put ext4: silence UBSAN in ext4_mb_init() ext4: address UBSAN warning in mb_find_order_for_block() ext4: fix oops on corrupted filesystem ext4: fix check of dqget() return value in ext4_ioctl_setproject() ext4: clean up error handling when orphan list is corrupted ext4: fix hang when processing corrupted orphaned inode list ext4: remove trailing \n from ext4_warning/ext4_error calls ext4: fix races between changing inode journal mode and ext4_writepages ext4: handle unwritten or delalloc buffers before enabling data journaling ext4: fix jbd2 handle extension in ext4_ext_truncate_extend_restart() ext4: do not ask jbd2 to write data for delalloc buffers jbd2: add support for avoiding data writes during transaction commits ...
2016-05-24 12:55:26 -07:00
Fix a number of bugs, most notably a potential stale data exposure after a crash and a potential BUG_ON crash if a file has the data journalling flag enabled while it has dirty delayed allocation blocks that haven't been written yet. Also fix a potential crash in the new project quota code and a maliciously corrupted file system. In addition, fix some DAX-specific bugs, including when there is a transient ENOSPC situation and races between writes via direct I/O and an mmap'ed segment that could lead to lost I/O. Finally the usual set of miscellaneous cleanups. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJXQ40fAAoJEPL5WVaVDYGjnwMH+wXHASgPfzZgtRInsTG8W/2L jsmAcMlyMAYIATWMppNtPIq0td49z1dYO0YkKhtPVMwfzu230IFWhGWp93WqP9ve XYHMmaBorFlMAzWgMKn1K0ExWZlV+ammmcTKgU0kU4qyZp0G/NnMtlXIkSNv2amI 9Mn6R+v97c20gn8e9HWP/IVWkgPr+WBtEXaSGjC7dL6yI8hL+rJMqN82D76oU5ea vtwzrna/ISijy+etYmQzqHNYNaBKf40+B5HxQZw/Ta3FSHofBwXAyLaeEAr260Mf V3Eg2NDcKQxiZ3adBzIUvrRnrJV381OmHoguo8Frs8YHTTRiZ0T/s7FGr2Q0NYE= =7yIM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o: "Fix a number of bugs, most notably a potential stale data exposure after a crash and a potential BUG_ON crash if a file has the data journalling flag enabled while it has dirty delayed allocation blocks that haven't been written yet. Also fix a potential crash in the new project quota code and a maliciously corrupted file system. In addition, fix some DAX-specific bugs, including when there is a transient ENOSPC situation and races between writes via direct I/O and an mmap'ed segment that could lead to lost I/O. Finally the usual set of miscellaneous cleanups" * tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (23 commits) ext4: pre-zero allocated blocks for DAX IO ext4: refactor direct IO code ext4: fix race in transient ENOSPC detection ext4: handle transient ENOSPC properly for DAX dax: call get_blocks() with create == 1 for write faults to unwritten extents ext4: remove unmeetable inconsisteny check from ext4_find_extent() jbd2: remove excess descriptions for handle_s ext4: remove unnecessary bio get/put ext4: silence UBSAN in ext4_mb_init() ext4: address UBSAN warning in mb_find_order_for_block() ext4: fix oops on corrupted filesystem ext4: fix check of dqget() return value in ext4_ioctl_setproject() ext4: clean up error handling when orphan list is corrupted ext4: fix hang when processing corrupted orphaned inode list ext4: remove trailing \n from ext4_warning/ext4_error calls ext4: fix races between changing inode journal mode and ext4_writepages ext4: handle unwritten or delalloc buffers before enabling data journaling ext4: fix jbd2 handle extension in ext4_ext_truncate_extend_restart() ext4: do not ask jbd2 to write data for delalloc buffers jbd2: add support for avoiding data writes during transaction commits ...
2016-05-24 12:55:26 -07:00
Fix a number of bugs, most notably a potential stale data exposure after a crash and a potential BUG_ON crash if a file has the data journalling flag enabled while it has dirty delayed allocation blocks that haven't been written yet. Also fix a potential crash in the new project quota code and a maliciously corrupted file system. In addition, fix some DAX-specific bugs, including when there is a transient ENOSPC situation and races between writes via direct I/O and an mmap'ed segment that could lead to lost I/O. Finally the usual set of miscellaneous cleanups. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJXQ40fAAoJEPL5WVaVDYGjnwMH+wXHASgPfzZgtRInsTG8W/2L jsmAcMlyMAYIATWMppNtPIq0td49z1dYO0YkKhtPVMwfzu230IFWhGWp93WqP9ve XYHMmaBorFlMAzWgMKn1K0ExWZlV+ammmcTKgU0kU4qyZp0G/NnMtlXIkSNv2amI 9Mn6R+v97c20gn8e9HWP/IVWkgPr+WBtEXaSGjC7dL6yI8hL+rJMqN82D76oU5ea vtwzrna/ISijy+etYmQzqHNYNaBKf40+B5HxQZw/Ta3FSHofBwXAyLaeEAr260Mf V3Eg2NDcKQxiZ3adBzIUvrRnrJV381OmHoguo8Frs8YHTTRiZ0T/s7FGr2Q0NYE= =7yIM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o: "Fix a number of bugs, most notably a potential stale data exposure after a crash and a potential BUG_ON crash if a file has the data journalling flag enabled while it has dirty delayed allocation blocks that haven't been written yet. Also fix a potential crash in the new project quota code and a maliciously corrupted file system. In addition, fix some DAX-specific bugs, including when there is a transient ENOSPC situation and races between writes via direct I/O and an mmap'ed segment that could lead to lost I/O. Finally the usual set of miscellaneous cleanups" * tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (23 commits) ext4: pre-zero allocated blocks for DAX IO ext4: refactor direct IO code ext4: fix race in transient ENOSPC detection ext4: handle transient ENOSPC properly for DAX dax: call get_blocks() with create == 1 for write faults to unwritten extents ext4: remove unmeetable inconsisteny check from ext4_find_extent() jbd2: remove excess descriptions for handle_s ext4: remove unnecessary bio get/put ext4: silence UBSAN in ext4_mb_init() ext4: address UBSAN warning in mb_find_order_for_block() ext4: fix oops on corrupted filesystem ext4: fix check of dqget() return value in ext4_ioctl_setproject() ext4: clean up error handling when orphan list is corrupted ext4: fix hang when processing corrupted orphaned inode list ext4: remove trailing \n from ext4_warning/ext4_error calls ext4: fix races between changing inode journal mode and ext4_writepages ext4: handle unwritten or delalloc buffers before enabling data journaling ext4: fix jbd2 handle extension in ext4_ext_truncate_extend_restart() ext4: do not ask jbd2 to write data for delalloc buffers jbd2: add support for avoiding data writes during transaction commits ...
2016-05-24 12:55:26 -07:00
Fix a number of bugs, most notably a potential stale data exposure after a crash and a potential BUG_ON crash if a file has the data journalling flag enabled while it has dirty delayed allocation blocks that haven't been written yet. Also fix a potential crash in the new project quota code and a maliciously corrupted file system. In addition, fix some DAX-specific bugs, including when there is a transient ENOSPC situation and races between writes via direct I/O and an mmap'ed segment that could lead to lost I/O. Finally the usual set of miscellaneous cleanups. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJXQ40fAAoJEPL5WVaVDYGjnwMH+wXHASgPfzZgtRInsTG8W/2L jsmAcMlyMAYIATWMppNtPIq0td49z1dYO0YkKhtPVMwfzu230IFWhGWp93WqP9ve XYHMmaBorFlMAzWgMKn1K0ExWZlV+ammmcTKgU0kU4qyZp0G/NnMtlXIkSNv2amI 9Mn6R+v97c20gn8e9HWP/IVWkgPr+WBtEXaSGjC7dL6yI8hL+rJMqN82D76oU5ea vtwzrna/ISijy+etYmQzqHNYNaBKf40+B5HxQZw/Ta3FSHofBwXAyLaeEAr260Mf V3Eg2NDcKQxiZ3adBzIUvrRnrJV381OmHoguo8Frs8YHTTRiZ0T/s7FGr2Q0NYE= =7yIM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o: "Fix a number of bugs, most notably a potential stale data exposure after a crash and a potential BUG_ON crash if a file has the data journalling flag enabled while it has dirty delayed allocation blocks that haven't been written yet. Also fix a potential crash in the new project quota code and a maliciously corrupted file system. In addition, fix some DAX-specific bugs, including when there is a transient ENOSPC situation and races between writes via direct I/O and an mmap'ed segment that could lead to lost I/O. Finally the usual set of miscellaneous cleanups" * tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (23 commits) ext4: pre-zero allocated blocks for DAX IO ext4: refactor direct IO code ext4: fix race in transient ENOSPC detection ext4: handle transient ENOSPC properly for DAX dax: call get_blocks() with create == 1 for write faults to unwritten extents ext4: remove unmeetable inconsisteny check from ext4_find_extent() jbd2: remove excess descriptions for handle_s ext4: remove unnecessary bio get/put ext4: silence UBSAN in ext4_mb_init() ext4: address UBSAN warning in mb_find_order_for_block() ext4: fix oops on corrupted filesystem ext4: fix check of dqget() return value in ext4_ioctl_setproject() ext4: clean up error handling when orphan list is corrupted ext4: fix hang when processing corrupted orphaned inode list ext4: remove trailing \n from ext4_warning/ext4_error calls ext4: fix races between changing inode journal mode and ext4_writepages ext4: handle unwritten or delalloc buffers before enabling data journaling ext4: fix jbd2 handle extension in ext4_ext_truncate_extend_restart() ext4: do not ask jbd2 to write data for delalloc buffers jbd2: add support for avoiding data writes during transaction commits ...
2016-05-24 12:55:26 -07:00
vfs: pagecache usage optimization for pagesize!=blocksize When we read some part of a file through pagecache, if there is a pagecache of corresponding index but this page is not uptodate, read IO is issued and this page will be uptodate. I think this is good for pagesize == blocksize environment but there is room for improvement on pagesize != blocksize environment. Because in this case a page can have multiple buffers and even if a page is not uptodate, some buffers can be uptodate. So I suggest that when all buffers which correspond to a part of a file that we want to read are uptodate, use this pagecache and copy data from this pagecache to user buffer even if a page is not uptodate. This can reduce read IO and improve system throughput. I wrote a benchmark program and got result number with this program. This benchmark do: 1: mount and open a test file. 2: create a 512MB file. 3: close a file and umount. 4: mount and again open a test file. 5: pwrite randomly 300000 times on a test file. offset is aligned by IO size(1024bytes). 6: measure time of preading randomly 100000 times on a test file. The result was: 2.6.26 330 sec 2.6.26-patched 226 sec Arch:i386 Filesystem:ext3 Blocksize:1024 bytes Memory: 1GB On ext3/4, a file is written through buffer/block. So random read/write mixed workloads or random read after random write workloads are optimized with this patch under pagesize != blocksize environment. This test result showed this. The benchmark program is as follows: #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <time.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mount.h> #define LEN 1024 #define LOOP 1024*512 /* 512MB */ main(void) { unsigned long i, offset, filesize; int fd; char buf[LEN]; time_t t1, t2; if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } memset(buf, 0, LEN); fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_CREAT|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i++) write(fd, buf, LEN); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_RDWR); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } filesize = LEN * LOOP; for (i = 0; i < 300000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pwrite(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } printf("start test\n"); time(&t1); for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pread(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } time(&t2); printf("%ld sec\n", t2-t1); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } } Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-28 15:46:36 -07:00
vfs: pagecache usage optimization for pagesize!=blocksize When we read some part of a file through pagecache, if there is a pagecache of corresponding index but this page is not uptodate, read IO is issued and this page will be uptodate. I think this is good for pagesize == blocksize environment but there is room for improvement on pagesize != blocksize environment. Because in this case a page can have multiple buffers and even if a page is not uptodate, some buffers can be uptodate. So I suggest that when all buffers which correspond to a part of a file that we want to read are uptodate, use this pagecache and copy data from this pagecache to user buffer even if a page is not uptodate. This can reduce read IO and improve system throughput. I wrote a benchmark program and got result number with this program. This benchmark do: 1: mount and open a test file. 2: create a 512MB file. 3: close a file and umount. 4: mount and again open a test file. 5: pwrite randomly 300000 times on a test file. offset is aligned by IO size(1024bytes). 6: measure time of preading randomly 100000 times on a test file. The result was: 2.6.26 330 sec 2.6.26-patched 226 sec Arch:i386 Filesystem:ext3 Blocksize:1024 bytes Memory: 1GB On ext3/4, a file is written through buffer/block. So random read/write mixed workloads or random read after random write workloads are optimized with this patch under pagesize != blocksize environment. This test result showed this. The benchmark program is as follows: #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <time.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mount.h> #define LEN 1024 #define LOOP 1024*512 /* 512MB */ main(void) { unsigned long i, offset, filesize; int fd; char buf[LEN]; time_t t1, t2; if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } memset(buf, 0, LEN); fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_CREAT|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i++) write(fd, buf, LEN); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_RDWR); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } filesize = LEN * LOOP; for (i = 0; i < 300000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pwrite(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } printf("start test\n"); time(&t1); for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pread(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } time(&t2); printf("%ld sec\n", t2-t1); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } } Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-28 15:46:36 -07:00
vfs: pagecache usage optimization for pagesize!=blocksize When we read some part of a file through pagecache, if there is a pagecache of corresponding index but this page is not uptodate, read IO is issued and this page will be uptodate. I think this is good for pagesize == blocksize environment but there is room for improvement on pagesize != blocksize environment. Because in this case a page can have multiple buffers and even if a page is not uptodate, some buffers can be uptodate. So I suggest that when all buffers which correspond to a part of a file that we want to read are uptodate, use this pagecache and copy data from this pagecache to user buffer even if a page is not uptodate. This can reduce read IO and improve system throughput. I wrote a benchmark program and got result number with this program. This benchmark do: 1: mount and open a test file. 2: create a 512MB file. 3: close a file and umount. 4: mount and again open a test file. 5: pwrite randomly 300000 times on a test file. offset is aligned by IO size(1024bytes). 6: measure time of preading randomly 100000 times on a test file. The result was: 2.6.26 330 sec 2.6.26-patched 226 sec Arch:i386 Filesystem:ext3 Blocksize:1024 bytes Memory: 1GB On ext3/4, a file is written through buffer/block. So random read/write mixed workloads or random read after random write workloads are optimized with this patch under pagesize != blocksize environment. This test result showed this. The benchmark program is as follows: #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <time.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mount.h> #define LEN 1024 #define LOOP 1024*512 /* 512MB */ main(void) { unsigned long i, offset, filesize; int fd; char buf[LEN]; time_t t1, t2; if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } memset(buf, 0, LEN); fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_CREAT|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i++) write(fd, buf, LEN); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_RDWR); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } filesize = LEN * LOOP; for (i = 0; i < 300000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pwrite(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } printf("start test\n"); time(&t1); for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pread(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } time(&t2); printf("%ld sec\n", t2-t1); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } } Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-28 15:46:36 -07:00
vfs: pagecache usage optimization for pagesize!=blocksize When we read some part of a file through pagecache, if there is a pagecache of corresponding index but this page is not uptodate, read IO is issued and this page will be uptodate. I think this is good for pagesize == blocksize environment but there is room for improvement on pagesize != blocksize environment. Because in this case a page can have multiple buffers and even if a page is not uptodate, some buffers can be uptodate. So I suggest that when all buffers which correspond to a part of a file that we want to read are uptodate, use this pagecache and copy data from this pagecache to user buffer even if a page is not uptodate. This can reduce read IO and improve system throughput. I wrote a benchmark program and got result number with this program. This benchmark do: 1: mount and open a test file. 2: create a 512MB file. 3: close a file and umount. 4: mount and again open a test file. 5: pwrite randomly 300000 times on a test file. offset is aligned by IO size(1024bytes). 6: measure time of preading randomly 100000 times on a test file. The result was: 2.6.26 330 sec 2.6.26-patched 226 sec Arch:i386 Filesystem:ext3 Blocksize:1024 bytes Memory: 1GB On ext3/4, a file is written through buffer/block. So random read/write mixed workloads or random read after random write workloads are optimized with this patch under pagesize != blocksize environment. This test result showed this. The benchmark program is as follows: #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <time.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mount.h> #define LEN 1024 #define LOOP 1024*512 /* 512MB */ main(void) { unsigned long i, offset, filesize; int fd; char buf[LEN]; time_t t1, t2; if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } memset(buf, 0, LEN); fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_CREAT|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i++) write(fd, buf, LEN); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_RDWR); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } filesize = LEN * LOOP; for (i = 0; i < 300000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pwrite(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } printf("start test\n"); time(&t1); for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pread(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } time(&t2); printf("%ld sec\n", t2-t1); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } } Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-28 15:46:36 -07:00
vfs: pagecache usage optimization for pagesize!=blocksize When we read some part of a file through pagecache, if there is a pagecache of corresponding index but this page is not uptodate, read IO is issued and this page will be uptodate. I think this is good for pagesize == blocksize environment but there is room for improvement on pagesize != blocksize environment. Because in this case a page can have multiple buffers and even if a page is not uptodate, some buffers can be uptodate. So I suggest that when all buffers which correspond to a part of a file that we want to read are uptodate, use this pagecache and copy data from this pagecache to user buffer even if a page is not uptodate. This can reduce read IO and improve system throughput. I wrote a benchmark program and got result number with this program. This benchmark do: 1: mount and open a test file. 2: create a 512MB file. 3: close a file and umount. 4: mount and again open a test file. 5: pwrite randomly 300000 times on a test file. offset is aligned by IO size(1024bytes). 6: measure time of preading randomly 100000 times on a test file. The result was: 2.6.26 330 sec 2.6.26-patched 226 sec Arch:i386 Filesystem:ext3 Blocksize:1024 bytes Memory: 1GB On ext3/4, a file is written through buffer/block. So random read/write mixed workloads or random read after random write workloads are optimized with this patch under pagesize != blocksize environment. This test result showed this. The benchmark program is as follows: #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <time.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mount.h> #define LEN 1024 #define LOOP 1024*512 /* 512MB */ main(void) { unsigned long i, offset, filesize; int fd; char buf[LEN]; time_t t1, t2; if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } memset(buf, 0, LEN); fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_CREAT|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i++) write(fd, buf, LEN); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_RDWR); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } filesize = LEN * LOOP; for (i = 0; i < 300000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pwrite(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } printf("start test\n"); time(&t1); for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pread(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } time(&t2); printf("%ld sec\n", t2-t1); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } } Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-28 15:46:36 -07:00
vfs: pagecache usage optimization for pagesize!=blocksize When we read some part of a file through pagecache, if there is a pagecache of corresponding index but this page is not uptodate, read IO is issued and this page will be uptodate. I think this is good for pagesize == blocksize environment but there is room for improvement on pagesize != blocksize environment. Because in this case a page can have multiple buffers and even if a page is not uptodate, some buffers can be uptodate. So I suggest that when all buffers which correspond to a part of a file that we want to read are uptodate, use this pagecache and copy data from this pagecache to user buffer even if a page is not uptodate. This can reduce read IO and improve system throughput. I wrote a benchmark program and got result number with this program. This benchmark do: 1: mount and open a test file. 2: create a 512MB file. 3: close a file and umount. 4: mount and again open a test file. 5: pwrite randomly 300000 times on a test file. offset is aligned by IO size(1024bytes). 6: measure time of preading randomly 100000 times on a test file. The result was: 2.6.26 330 sec 2.6.26-patched 226 sec Arch:i386 Filesystem:ext3 Blocksize:1024 bytes Memory: 1GB On ext3/4, a file is written through buffer/block. So random read/write mixed workloads or random read after random write workloads are optimized with this patch under pagesize != blocksize environment. This test result showed this. The benchmark program is as follows: #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <time.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mount.h> #define LEN 1024 #define LOOP 1024*512 /* 512MB */ main(void) { unsigned long i, offset, filesize; int fd; char buf[LEN]; time_t t1, t2; if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } memset(buf, 0, LEN); fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_CREAT|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i++) write(fd, buf, LEN); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_RDWR); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } filesize = LEN * LOOP; for (i = 0; i < 300000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pwrite(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } printf("start test\n"); time(&t1); for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pread(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } time(&t2); printf("%ld sec\n", t2-t1); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } } Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-28 15:46:36 -07:00
vfs: pagecache usage optimization for pagesize!=blocksize When we read some part of a file through pagecache, if there is a pagecache of corresponding index but this page is not uptodate, read IO is issued and this page will be uptodate. I think this is good for pagesize == blocksize environment but there is room for improvement on pagesize != blocksize environment. Because in this case a page can have multiple buffers and even if a page is not uptodate, some buffers can be uptodate. So I suggest that when all buffers which correspond to a part of a file that we want to read are uptodate, use this pagecache and copy data from this pagecache to user buffer even if a page is not uptodate. This can reduce read IO and improve system throughput. I wrote a benchmark program and got result number with this program. This benchmark do: 1: mount and open a test file. 2: create a 512MB file. 3: close a file and umount. 4: mount and again open a test file. 5: pwrite randomly 300000 times on a test file. offset is aligned by IO size(1024bytes). 6: measure time of preading randomly 100000 times on a test file. The result was: 2.6.26 330 sec 2.6.26-patched 226 sec Arch:i386 Filesystem:ext3 Blocksize:1024 bytes Memory: 1GB On ext3/4, a file is written through buffer/block. So random read/write mixed workloads or random read after random write workloads are optimized with this patch under pagesize != blocksize environment. This test result showed this. The benchmark program is as follows: #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <time.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mount.h> #define LEN 1024 #define LOOP 1024*512 /* 512MB */ main(void) { unsigned long i, offset, filesize; int fd; char buf[LEN]; time_t t1, t2; if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } memset(buf, 0, LEN); fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_CREAT|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i++) write(fd, buf, LEN); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_RDWR); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } filesize = LEN * LOOP; for (i = 0; i < 300000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pwrite(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } printf("start test\n"); time(&t1); for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pread(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } time(&t2); printf("%ld sec\n", t2-t1); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } } Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-28 15:46:36 -07:00
vfs: pagecache usage optimization for pagesize!=blocksize When we read some part of a file through pagecache, if there is a pagecache of corresponding index but this page is not uptodate, read IO is issued and this page will be uptodate. I think this is good for pagesize == blocksize environment but there is room for improvement on pagesize != blocksize environment. Because in this case a page can have multiple buffers and even if a page is not uptodate, some buffers can be uptodate. So I suggest that when all buffers which correspond to a part of a file that we want to read are uptodate, use this pagecache and copy data from this pagecache to user buffer even if a page is not uptodate. This can reduce read IO and improve system throughput. I wrote a benchmark program and got result number with this program. This benchmark do: 1: mount and open a test file. 2: create a 512MB file. 3: close a file and umount. 4: mount and again open a test file. 5: pwrite randomly 300000 times on a test file. offset is aligned by IO size(1024bytes). 6: measure time of preading randomly 100000 times on a test file. The result was: 2.6.26 330 sec 2.6.26-patched 226 sec Arch:i386 Filesystem:ext3 Blocksize:1024 bytes Memory: 1GB On ext3/4, a file is written through buffer/block. So random read/write mixed workloads or random read after random write workloads are optimized with this patch under pagesize != blocksize environment. This test result showed this. The benchmark program is as follows: #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <time.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mount.h> #define LEN 1024 #define LOOP 1024*512 /* 512MB */ main(void) { unsigned long i, offset, filesize; int fd; char buf[LEN]; time_t t1, t2; if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } memset(buf, 0, LEN); fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_CREAT|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i++) write(fd, buf, LEN); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_RDWR); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } filesize = LEN * LOOP; for (i = 0; i < 300000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pwrite(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } printf("start test\n"); time(&t1); for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pread(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } time(&t2); printf("%ld sec\n", t2-t1); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } } Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-28 15:46:36 -07:00
vfs: pagecache usage optimization for pagesize!=blocksize When we read some part of a file through pagecache, if there is a pagecache of corresponding index but this page is not uptodate, read IO is issued and this page will be uptodate. I think this is good for pagesize == blocksize environment but there is room for improvement on pagesize != blocksize environment. Because in this case a page can have multiple buffers and even if a page is not uptodate, some buffers can be uptodate. So I suggest that when all buffers which correspond to a part of a file that we want to read are uptodate, use this pagecache and copy data from this pagecache to user buffer even if a page is not uptodate. This can reduce read IO and improve system throughput. I wrote a benchmark program and got result number with this program. This benchmark do: 1: mount and open a test file. 2: create a 512MB file. 3: close a file and umount. 4: mount and again open a test file. 5: pwrite randomly 300000 times on a test file. offset is aligned by IO size(1024bytes). 6: measure time of preading randomly 100000 times on a test file. The result was: 2.6.26 330 sec 2.6.26-patched 226 sec Arch:i386 Filesystem:ext3 Blocksize:1024 bytes Memory: 1GB On ext3/4, a file is written through buffer/block. So random read/write mixed workloads or random read after random write workloads are optimized with this patch under pagesize != blocksize environment. This test result showed this. The benchmark program is as follows: #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <time.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mount.h> #define LEN 1024 #define LOOP 1024*512 /* 512MB */ main(void) { unsigned long i, offset, filesize; int fd; char buf[LEN]; time_t t1, t2; if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } memset(buf, 0, LEN); fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_CREAT|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } for (i = 0; i < LOOP; i++) write(fd, buf, LEN); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } if (mount("/dev/sda1", "/root/test1/", "ext3", 0, 0) < 0) { perror("cannot mount\n"); exit(1); } fd = open("/root/test1/testfile", O_RDWR); if (fd < 0) { perror("cannot open file\n"); exit(1); } filesize = LEN * LOOP; for (i = 0; i < 300000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pwrite(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } printf("start test\n"); time(&t1); for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ offset = (random() % filesize) & (~(LEN - 1)); pread(fd, buf, LEN, offset); } time(&t2); printf("%ld sec\n", t2-t1); close(fd); if (umount("/root/test1/") < 0) { perror("cannot umount\n"); exit(1); } } Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-28 15:46:36 -07:00
ext4: ignore EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA flag with delalloc Ext4 does not support data journalling with delayed allocation enabled. We even do not allow to mount the file system with delayed allocation and data journalling enabled, however it can be set via FS_IOC_SETFLAGS so we can hit the inode with EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA set even on file system mounted with delayed allocation (default) and that's where problem arises. The easies way to reproduce this problem is with the following set of commands: mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdd mount /dev/sdd /mnt/test1 dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test1/file bs=1M count=4 chattr +j /mnt/test1/file dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test1/file bs=1M count=4 conv=notrunc chattr -j /mnt/test1/file Additionally it can be reproduced quite reliably with xfstests 272 and 269. In fact the above reproducer is a part of test 272. To fix this we should ignore the EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA inode flag if the file system is mounted with delayed allocation. This can be easily done by fixing ext4_should_*_data() functions do ignore data journal flag when delalloc is set (suggested by Ted). We also have to set the appropriate address space operations for the inode (again, ignoring data journal flag if delalloc enabled). Additionally this commit introduces ext4_inode_journal_mode() function because ext4_should_*_data() has already had a lot of common code and this change is putting it all into one function so it is easier to read. Successfully tested with xfstests in following configurations: delalloc + data=ordered delalloc + data=writeback data=journal nodelalloc + data=ordered nodelalloc + data=writeback nodelalloc + data=journal Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2012-02-20 17:53:00 -05:00
ext4: ignore EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA flag with delalloc Ext4 does not support data journalling with delayed allocation enabled. We even do not allow to mount the file system with delayed allocation and data journalling enabled, however it can be set via FS_IOC_SETFLAGS so we can hit the inode with EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA set even on file system mounted with delayed allocation (default) and that's where problem arises. The easies way to reproduce this problem is with the following set of commands: mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdd mount /dev/sdd /mnt/test1 dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test1/file bs=1M count=4 chattr +j /mnt/test1/file dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test1/file bs=1M count=4 conv=notrunc chattr -j /mnt/test1/file Additionally it can be reproduced quite reliably with xfstests 272 and 269. In fact the above reproducer is a part of test 272. To fix this we should ignore the EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA inode flag if the file system is mounted with delayed allocation. This can be easily done by fixing ext4_should_*_data() functions do ignore data journal flag when delalloc is set (suggested by Ted). We also have to set the appropriate address space operations for the inode (again, ignoring data journal flag if delalloc enabled). Additionally this commit introduces ext4_inode_journal_mode() function because ext4_should_*_data() has already had a lot of common code and this change is putting it all into one function so it is easier to read. Successfully tested with xfstests in following configurations: delalloc + data=ordered delalloc + data=writeback data=journal nodelalloc + data=ordered nodelalloc + data=writeback nodelalloc + data=journal Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2012-02-20 17:53:00 -05:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: don't BUG when truncating encrypted inodes on the orphan list commit 0d06863f903ac5f4f6efb0273079d27de3e53a28 upstream. Fix a BUG when the kernel tries to mount a file system constructed as follows: echo foo > foo.txt mke2fs -Fq -t ext4 -O encrypt foo.img 100 debugfs -w foo.img << EOF write foo.txt a set_inode_field a i_flags 0x80800 set_super_value s_last_orphan 12 quit EOF root@kvm-xfstests:~# mount -o loop foo.img /mnt [ 160.238770] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 160.240106] kernel BUG at /usr/projects/linux/ext4/fs/ext4/inode.c:3874! [ 160.240106] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 160.240106] Modules linked in: [ 160.240106] CPU: 0 PID: 2547 Comm: mount Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00034-gcdd33b941b67 #227 [ 160.240106] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014 [ 160.240106] task: f4518000 task.stack: f47b6000 [ 160.240106] EIP: ext4_block_zero_page_range+0x1a7/0x2b4 [ 160.240106] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0 [ 160.240106] EAX: 00000001 EBX: f7be4b50 ECX: f47b7dc0 EDX: 00000007 [ 160.240106] ESI: f43b05a8 EDI: f43babec EBP: f47b7dd0 ESP: f47b7dac [ 160.240106] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 [ 160.240106] CR0: 80050033 CR2: bfd85b08 CR3: 34a00680 CR4: 000006f0 [ 160.240106] Call Trace: [ 160.240106] ext4_truncate+0x1e9/0x3e5 [ 160.240106] ext4_fill_super+0x286f/0x2b1e [ 160.240106] ? set_blocksize+0x2e/0x7e [ 160.240106] mount_bdev+0x114/0x15f [ 160.240106] ext4_mount+0x15/0x17 [ 160.240106] ? ext4_calculate_overhead+0x39d/0x39d [ 160.240106] mount_fs+0x58/0x115 [ 160.240106] vfs_kern_mount+0x4b/0xae [ 160.240106] do_mount+0x671/0x8c3 [ 160.240106] ? _copy_from_user+0x70/0x83 [ 160.240106] ? strndup_user+0x31/0x46 [ 160.240106] SyS_mount+0x57/0x7b [ 160.240106] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61 [ 160.240106] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f [ 160.240106] EIP: 0xb76b919e [ 160.240106] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0 [ 160.240106] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08053838 ECX: 08052188 EDX: 080537e8 [ 160.240106] ESI: c0ed0000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 080537e8 ESP: bfa13660 [ 160.240106] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b [ 160.240106] Code: 59 8b 00 a8 01 0f 84 09 01 00 00 8b 07 66 25 00 f0 66 3d 00 80 75 61 89 f8 e8 3e e2 ff ff 84 c0 74 56 83 bf 48 02 00 00 00 75 02 <0f> 0b 81 7d e8 00 10 00 00 74 02 0f 0b 8b 43 04 8b 53 08 31 c9 [ 160.240106] EIP: ext4_block_zero_page_range+0x1a7/0x2b4 SS:ESP: 0068:f47b7dac [ 160.317241] ---[ end trace d6a773a375c810a5 ]--- The problem is that when the kernel tries to truncate an inode in ext4_truncate(), it tries to clear any on-disk data beyond i_size. Without the encryption key, it can't do that, and so it triggers a BUG. E2fsck does *not* provide this service, and in practice most file systems have their orphan list processed by e2fsck, so to avoid crashing, this patch skips this step if we don't have access to the encryption key (which is the case when processing the orphan list; in all other cases, we will have the encryption key, or the kernel wouldn't have allowed the file to be opened). An open question is whether the fact that e2fsck isn't clearing the bytes beyond i_size causing problems --- and if we've lived with it not doing it for so long, can we drop this from the kernel replay of the orphan list in all cases (not just when we don't have the key for encrypted inodes). Addresses-Google-Bug: #35209576 Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-02-14 11:31:15 -05:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
ext4: Expand extra_inodes space per the s_{want,min}_extra_isize fields We need to make sure that existing ext3 filesystems can also avail the new fields that have been added to the ext4 inode. We use s_want_extra_isize and s_min_extra_isize to decide by how much we should expand the inode. If EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE feature is set then we expand the inode by max(s_want_extra_isize, s_min_extra_isize , sizeof(ext4_inode) - EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) bytes. Actually it is still an open question about whether users should be able to set s_*_extra_isize smaller than the known fields or not. This patch also adds the functionality to expand inodes to include the newly added fields. We start by trying to expand by s_want_extra_isize bytes and if its fails we try to expand by s_min_extra_isize bytes. This is done by changing the i_extra_isize if enough space is available in the inode and no EAs are present. If EAs are present and there is enough space in the inode then the EAs in the inode are shifted to make space. If enough space is not available in the inode due to the EAs then 1 or more EAs are shifted to the external EA block. In the worst case when even the external EA block does not have enough space we inform the user that some EA would need to be deleted or s_min_extra_isize would have to be reduced. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2007-07-18 09:19:57 -04:00
ext4: Expand extra_inodes space per the s_{want,min}_extra_isize fields We need to make sure that existing ext3 filesystems can also avail the new fields that have been added to the ext4 inode. We use s_want_extra_isize and s_min_extra_isize to decide by how much we should expand the inode. If EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE feature is set then we expand the inode by max(s_want_extra_isize, s_min_extra_isize , sizeof(ext4_inode) - EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) bytes. Actually it is still an open question about whether users should be able to set s_*_extra_isize smaller than the known fields or not. This patch also adds the functionality to expand inodes to include the newly added fields. We start by trying to expand by s_want_extra_isize bytes and if its fails we try to expand by s_min_extra_isize bytes. This is done by changing the i_extra_isize if enough space is available in the inode and no EAs are present. If EAs are present and there is enough space in the inode then the EAs in the inode are shifted to make space. If enough space is not available in the inode due to the EAs then 1 or more EAs are shifted to the external EA block. In the worst case when even the external EA block does not have enough space we inform the user that some EA would need to be deleted or s_min_extra_isize would have to be reduced. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2007-07-18 09:19:57 -04:00
ext4: Expand extra_inodes space per the s_{want,min}_extra_isize fields We need to make sure that existing ext3 filesystems can also avail the new fields that have been added to the ext4 inode. We use s_want_extra_isize and s_min_extra_isize to decide by how much we should expand the inode. If EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE feature is set then we expand the inode by max(s_want_extra_isize, s_min_extra_isize , sizeof(ext4_inode) - EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) bytes. Actually it is still an open question about whether users should be able to set s_*_extra_isize smaller than the known fields or not. This patch also adds the functionality to expand inodes to include the newly added fields. We start by trying to expand by s_want_extra_isize bytes and if its fails we try to expand by s_min_extra_isize bytes. This is done by changing the i_extra_isize if enough space is available in the inode and no EAs are present. If EAs are present and there is enough space in the inode then the EAs in the inode are shifted to make space. If enough space is not available in the inode due to the EAs then 1 or more EAs are shifted to the external EA block. In the worst case when even the external EA block does not have enough space we inform the user that some EA would need to be deleted or s_min_extra_isize would have to be reduced. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2007-07-18 09:19:57 -04:00
ext4: Expand extra_inodes space per the s_{want,min}_extra_isize fields We need to make sure that existing ext3 filesystems can also avail the new fields that have been added to the ext4 inode. We use s_want_extra_isize and s_min_extra_isize to decide by how much we should expand the inode. If EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE feature is set then we expand the inode by max(s_want_extra_isize, s_min_extra_isize , sizeof(ext4_inode) - EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) bytes. Actually it is still an open question about whether users should be able to set s_*_extra_isize smaller than the known fields or not. This patch also adds the functionality to expand inodes to include the newly added fields. We start by trying to expand by s_want_extra_isize bytes and if its fails we try to expand by s_min_extra_isize bytes. This is done by changing the i_extra_isize if enough space is available in the inode and no EAs are present. If EAs are present and there is enough space in the inode then the EAs in the inode are shifted to make space. If enough space is not available in the inode due to the EAs then 1 or more EAs are shifted to the external EA block. In the worst case when even the external EA block does not have enough space we inform the user that some EA would need to be deleted or s_min_extra_isize would have to be reduced. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2007-07-18 09:19:57 -04:00
ext4: Expand extra_inodes space per the s_{want,min}_extra_isize fields We need to make sure that existing ext3 filesystems can also avail the new fields that have been added to the ext4 inode. We use s_want_extra_isize and s_min_extra_isize to decide by how much we should expand the inode. If EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE feature is set then we expand the inode by max(s_want_extra_isize, s_min_extra_isize , sizeof(ext4_inode) - EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) bytes. Actually it is still an open question about whether users should be able to set s_*_extra_isize smaller than the known fields or not. This patch also adds the functionality to expand inodes to include the newly added fields. We start by trying to expand by s_want_extra_isize bytes and if its fails we try to expand by s_min_extra_isize bytes. This is done by changing the i_extra_isize if enough space is available in the inode and no EAs are present. If EAs are present and there is enough space in the inode then the EAs in the inode are shifted to make space. If enough space is not available in the inode due to the EAs then 1 or more EAs are shifted to the external EA block. In the worst case when even the external EA block does not have enough space we inform the user that some EA would need to be deleted or s_min_extra_isize would have to be reduced. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2007-07-18 09:19:57 -04:00
ext4: Expand extra_inodes space per the s_{want,min}_extra_isize fields We need to make sure that existing ext3 filesystems can also avail the new fields that have been added to the ext4 inode. We use s_want_extra_isize and s_min_extra_isize to decide by how much we should expand the inode. If EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE feature is set then we expand the inode by max(s_want_extra_isize, s_min_extra_isize , sizeof(ext4_inode) - EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) bytes. Actually it is still an open question about whether users should be able to set s_*_extra_isize smaller than the known fields or not. This patch also adds the functionality to expand inodes to include the newly added fields. We start by trying to expand by s_want_extra_isize bytes and if its fails we try to expand by s_min_extra_isize bytes. This is done by changing the i_extra_isize if enough space is available in the inode and no EAs are present. If EAs are present and there is enough space in the inode then the EAs in the inode are shifted to make space. If enough space is not available in the inode due to the EAs then 1 or more EAs are shifted to the external EA block. In the worst case when even the external EA block does not have enough space we inform the user that some EA would need to be deleted or s_min_extra_isize would have to be reduced. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2007-07-18 09:19:57 -04:00
ext4: Expand extra_inodes space per the s_{want,min}_extra_isize fields We need to make sure that existing ext3 filesystems can also avail the new fields that have been added to the ext4 inode. We use s_want_extra_isize and s_min_extra_isize to decide by how much we should expand the inode. If EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE feature is set then we expand the inode by max(s_want_extra_isize, s_min_extra_isize , sizeof(ext4_inode) - EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) bytes. Actually it is still an open question about whether users should be able to set s_*_extra_isize smaller than the known fields or not. This patch also adds the functionality to expand inodes to include the newly added fields. We start by trying to expand by s_want_extra_isize bytes and if its fails we try to expand by s_min_extra_isize bytes. This is done by changing the i_extra_isize if enough space is available in the inode and no EAs are present. If EAs are present and there is enough space in the inode then the EAs in the inode are shifted to make space. If enough space is not available in the inode due to the EAs then 1 or more EAs are shifted to the external EA block. In the worst case when even the external EA block does not have enough space we inform the user that some EA would need to be deleted or s_min_extra_isize would have to be reduced. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
2007-07-18 09:19:57 -04:00
ext4: handle unwritten or delalloc buffers before enabling data journaling We already allocate delalloc blocks before changing the inode mode into "per-file data journal" mode to prevent delalloc blocks from remaining not allocated, but another issue concerned with "BH_Unwritten" status still exists. For example, by fallocate(), several buffers' status change into "BH_Unwritten", but these buffers cannot be processed by ext4_alloc_da_blocks(). So, they still remain in unwritten status after per-file data journaling is enabled and they cannot be changed into written status any more and, if they are journaled and eventually checkpointed, these unwritten buffer will cause a kernel panic by the below BUG_ON() function of submit_bh_wbc() when they are submitted during checkpointing. static int submit_bh_wbc(int rw, struct buffer_head *bh,... { ... BUG_ON(buffer_unwritten(bh)); Moreover, when "dioread_nolock" option is enabled, the status of a buffer is changed into "BH_Unwritten" after write_begin() completes and the "BH_Unwritten" status will be cleared after I/O is done. Therefore, if a buffer's status is changed into unwrutten but the buffer's I/O is not submitted and completed, it can cause the same problem after enabling per-file data journaling. You can easily generate this bug by executing the following command. ./kvm-xfstests -C 10000 -m nodelalloc,dioread_nolock generic/269 To resolve these problems and define a boundary between the previous mode and per-file data journaling mode, we need to flush and wait all the I/O of buffers of a file before enabling per-file data journaling of the file. Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2016-04-25 23:21:00 -04:00
ext4: handle unwritten or delalloc buffers before enabling data journaling We already allocate delalloc blocks before changing the inode mode into "per-file data journal" mode to prevent delalloc blocks from remaining not allocated, but another issue concerned with "BH_Unwritten" status still exists. For example, by fallocate(), several buffers' status change into "BH_Unwritten", but these buffers cannot be processed by ext4_alloc_da_blocks(). So, they still remain in unwritten status after per-file data journaling is enabled and they cannot be changed into written status any more and, if they are journaled and eventually checkpointed, these unwritten buffer will cause a kernel panic by the below BUG_ON() function of submit_bh_wbc() when they are submitted during checkpointing. static int submit_bh_wbc(int rw, struct buffer_head *bh,... { ... BUG_ON(buffer_unwritten(bh)); Moreover, when "dioread_nolock" option is enabled, the status of a buffer is changed into "BH_Unwritten" after write_begin() completes and the "BH_Unwritten" status will be cleared after I/O is done. Therefore, if a buffer's status is changed into unwrutten but the buffer's I/O is not submitted and completed, it can cause the same problem after enabling per-file data journaling. You can easily generate this bug by executing the following command. ./kvm-xfstests -C 10000 -m nodelalloc,dioread_nolock generic/269 To resolve these problems and define a boundary between the previous mode and per-file data journaling mode, we need to flush and wait all the I/O of buffers of a file before enabling per-file data journaling of the file. Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2016-04-25 23:21:00 -04:00
ext4: evict inline data when writing to memory map commit 7b4cc9787fe35b3ee2dfb1c35e22eafc32e00c33 upstream. Currently the case of writing via mmap to a file with inline data is not handled. This is maybe a rare case since it requires a writable memory map of a very small file, but it is trivial to trigger with on inline_data filesystem, and it causes the 'BUG_ON(ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA));' in ext4_writepages() to be hit: mkfs.ext4 -O inline_data /dev/vdb mount /dev/vdb /mnt xfs_io -f /mnt/file \ -c 'pwrite 0 1' \ -c 'mmap -w 0 1m' \ -c 'mwrite 0 1' \ -c 'fsync' kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:2723! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 1 PID: 2532 Comm: xfs_io Not tainted 4.11.0-rc1-xfstests-00301-g071d9acf3d1f #633 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-20170228_101828-anatol 04/01/2014 task: ffff88003d3a8040 task.stack: ffffc90000300000 RIP: 0010:ext4_writepages+0xc89/0xf8a RSP: 0018:ffffc90000303ca0 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: 0000028410000000 RBX: ffff8800383fa3b0 RCX: ffffffff812afcdc RDX: 00000a9d00000246 RSI: ffffffff81e660e0 RDI: 0000000000000246 RBP: ffffc90000303dc0 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 869618e8f99b4fa5 R10: 00000000852287a2 R11: 00000000a03b49f4 R12: ffff88003808e698 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 7fffffffffffffff R15: 7fffffffffffffff FS: 00007fd3e53094c0(0000) GS:ffff88003e400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fd3e4c51000 CR3: 000000003d554000 CR4: 00000000003406e0 Call Trace: ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x2a ? kvm_clock_read+0x1e/0x20 do_writepages+0x23/0x2c ? do_writepages+0x23/0x2c __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x80/0x87 filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x67/0x8c ext4_sync_file+0x20e/0x472 vfs_fsync_range+0x8e/0x9f ? syscall_trace_enter+0x25b/0x2d0 vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e do_fsync+0x31/0x4a SyS_fsync+0x10/0x14 do_syscall_64+0x69/0x131 entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 We could try to be smart and keep the inline data in this case, or at least support delayed allocation when allocating the block, but these solutions would be more complicated and don't seem worthwhile given how rare this case seems to be. So just fix the bug by calling ext4_convert_inline_data() when we're asked to make a page writable, so that any inline data gets evicted, with the block allocated immediately. Reported-by: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-04-30 00:10:50 -04:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
mm: only enforce stable page writes if the backing device requires it Create a helper function to check if a backing device requires stable page writes and, if so, performs the necessary wait. Then, make it so that all points in the memory manager that handle making pages writable use the helper function. This should provide stable page write support to most filesystems, while eliminating unnecessary waiting for devices that don't require the feature. Before this patchset, all filesystems would block, regardless of whether or not it was necessary. ext3 would wait, but still generate occasional checksum errors. The network filesystems were left to do their own thing, so they'd wait too. After this patchset, all the disk filesystems except ext3 and btrfs will wait only if the hardware requires it. ext3 (if necessary) snapshots pages instead of blocking, and btrfs provides its own bdi so the mm will never wait. Network filesystems haven't been touched, so either they provide their own stable page guarantees or they don't block at all. The blocking behavior is back to what it was before 3.0 if you don't have a disk requiring stable page writes. Here's the result of using dbench to test latency on ext2: 3.8.0-rc3: Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat ---------------------------------------- WriteX 109347 0.028 59.817 ReadX 347180 0.004 3.391 Flush 15514 29.828 287.283 Throughput 57.429 MB/sec 4 clients 4 procs max_latency=287.290 ms 3.8.0-rc3 + patches: WriteX 105556 0.029 4.273 ReadX 335004 0.005 4.112 Flush 14982 30.540 298.634 Throughput 55.4496 MB/sec 4 clients 4 procs max_latency=298.650 ms As you can see, the maximum write latency drops considerably with this patch enabled. The other filesystems (ext3/ext4/xfs/btrfs) behave similarly, but see the cover letter for those results. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com> Cc: Ron Minnich <rminnich@sandia.gov> Cc: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-02-21 16:42:51 -08:00
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00