kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-10-01 18:21:29 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/net/switchdev/switchdev.c

548 lines
15 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 152 Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-27 08:55:01 +02:00
net: introduce generic switch devices support The goal of this is to provide a possibility to support various switch chips. Drivers should implement relevant ndos to do so. Now there is only one ndo defined: - for getting physical switch id is in place. Note that user can use random port netdevice to access the switch. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Reviewed-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-11-28 14:34:17 +01:00
switchdev: introduce transaction item queue for attr_set and obj_add Now, the memory allocation in prepare/commit state is done separatelly in each driver (rocker). Introduce the similar mechanism in generic switchdev code, in form of queue. That can be used not only for memory allocations, but also for different items. Abort item destruction is handled as well. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-09-24 10:02:41 +02:00
switchdev: add netlink flags to IPv4 FIB add op Pass in the netlink flags (NLM_F_*) into switchdev driver for IPv4 FIB add op to allow driver to 1) optimize hardware updates, 2) handle ip route prepend and append commands correctly. Suggested-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Suggested-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-03-09 13:59:09 -07:00
net: introduce generic switch devices support The goal of this is to provide a possibility to support various switch chips. Drivers should implement relevant ndos to do so. Now there is only one ndo defined: - for getting physical switch id is in place. Note that user can use random port netdevice to access the switch. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Reviewed-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-11-28 14:34:17 +01:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
net: introduce generic switch devices support The goal of this is to provide a possibility to support various switch chips. Drivers should implement relevant ndos to do so. Now there is only one ndo defined: - for getting physical switch id is in place. Note that user can use random port netdevice to access the switch. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Reviewed-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-11-28 14:34:17 +01:00
switchdev: remove pointers from switchdev objects When object is used in deferred work, we cannot use pointers in switchdev object structures because the memory they point at may be already used by someone else. So rather do local copy of the value. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:51 +02:00
switchdev: add new switchdev bridge setlink Add new switchdev_port_bridge_setlink that can be used by drivers implementing .ndo_bridge_setlink to set switchdev bridge attributes. Basically turn the raw rtnl_bridge_setlink netlink into switchdev attr sets. Proper netlink attr policy checking is done on the protinfo part of the netlink msg. Currently, for protinfo, only bridge port attrs BR_LEARNING and BR_LEARNING_SYNC are parsed and passed to port driver. For afspec, VLAN objs are passed so switchdev driver can set VLANs assigned to SELF. To illustrate with iproute2 cmd, we have: bridge vlan add vid 10 dev sw1p1 self master To add VLAN 10 to port sw1p1 for both the bridge (master) and the device (self). Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:56 -07:00
switchdev: introduce transaction item queue for attr_set and obj_add Now, the memory allocation in prepare/commit state is done separatelly in each driver (rocker). Introduce the similar mechanism in generic switchdev code, in form of queue. That can be used not only for memory allocations, but also for different items. Abort item destruction is handled as well. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-09-24 10:02:41 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev deferred ops infrastructure Introduce infrastructure which will be used internally to defer ops. Note that the deferred ops are queued up and either are processed by scheduled work or explicitly by user calling deferred_process function. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:48 +02:00
switchdev: check if the vlan id is in the proper vlan range VLANs 0 and 4095 are reserved and shouldn't be used, add checks to switchdev similar to the bridge. Also make sure ids above 4095 cannot be passed either. Fixes: 47f8328bb1a4 ("switchdev: add new switchdev bridge setlink") Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Acked-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-12 14:31:01 +02:00
switchdev: Require RTNL mutex to be held when sending FDB notifications When switchdev drivers process FDB notifications from the underlying device they resolve the netdev to which the entry points to and notify the bridge using the switchdev notifier. However, since the RTNL mutex is not held there is nothing preventing the netdev from disappearing in the middle, which will cause br_switchdev_event() to dereference a non-existing netdev. Make switchdev drivers hold the lock at the beginning of the notification processing session and release it once it ends, after notifying the bridge. Also, remove switchdev_mutex and fdb_lock, as they are no longer needed when RTNL mutex is held. Fixes: 03bf0c281234 ("switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-01-27 15:16:43 +01:00
net: introduce generic switch devices support The goal of this is to provide a possibility to support various switch chips. Drivers should implement relevant ndos to do so. Now there is only one ndo defined: - for getting physical switch id is in place. Note that user can use random port netdevice to access the switch. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Reviewed-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-11-28 14:34:17 +01:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev deferred ops infrastructure Introduce infrastructure which will be used internally to defer ops. Note that the deferred ops are queued up and either are processed by scheduled work or explicitly by user calling deferred_process function. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:48 +02:00
net: switchdev: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-02-17 14:02:36 -06:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev deferred ops infrastructure Introduce infrastructure which will be used internally to defer ops. Note that the deferred ops are queued up and either are processed by scheduled work or explicitly by user calling deferred_process function. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:48 +02:00
net: switchdev: Replace port attr set SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_attr_set. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_attr_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET and calls the blocking (process) notifier chain. We have one odd case within net/bridge/br_switchdev.c with the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier that requires executing from atomic context, we deal with that one specifically. Drop __switchdev_port_attr_set() and update switchdev_port_attr_set() likewise. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:31 -08:00
net: bridge: propagate extack through switchdev_port_attr_set The benefit is the ability to propagate errors from switchdev drivers for the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING and SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_PROTOCOL attributes. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:43:17 +02:00
switchdev: introduce get/set attrs ops Add two new swdev ops for get/set switch port attributes. Most swdev interactions on a port are gets or sets on port attributes, so rather than adding ops for each attribute, let's define clean get/set ops for all attributes, and then we can have clear, consistent rules on how attributes propagate on stacked devs. Add the basic algorithms for get/set attr ops. Use the same recusive algo to walk lower devs we've used for STP updates, for example. For get, compare attr value for each lower dev and only return success if attr values match across all lower devs. For sets, set the same attr value for all lower devs. We'll use a two-phase prepare-commit transaction model for sets. In the first phase, the driver(s) are asked if attr set is OK. If all OK, the commit attr set in second phase. A driver would NACK the prepare phase if it can't set the attr due to lack of resources or support, within it's control. RTNL lock must be held across both phases because we'll recurse all lower devs first in prepare phase, and then recurse all lower devs again in commit phase. If any lower dev fails the prepare phase, we need to abort the transaction for all lower devs. If lower dev recusion isn't desired, allow a flag SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE to indicate get/set only work on port (lowest) device. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:48 -07:00
net: switchdev: Replace port attr set SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_attr_set. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_attr_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET and calls the blocking (process) notifier chain. We have one odd case within net/bridge/br_switchdev.c with the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier that requires executing from atomic context, we deal with that one specifically. Drop __switchdev_port_attr_set() and update switchdev_port_attr_set() likewise. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:31 -08:00
switchdev: introduce get/set attrs ops Add two new swdev ops for get/set switch port attributes. Most swdev interactions on a port are gets or sets on port attributes, so rather than adding ops for each attribute, let's define clean get/set ops for all attributes, and then we can have clear, consistent rules on how attributes propagate on stacked devs. Add the basic algorithms for get/set attr ops. Use the same recusive algo to walk lower devs we've used for STP updates, for example. For get, compare attr value for each lower dev and only return success if attr values match across all lower devs. For sets, set the same attr value for all lower devs. We'll use a two-phase prepare-commit transaction model for sets. In the first phase, the driver(s) are asked if attr set is OK. If all OK, the commit attr set in second phase. A driver would NACK the prepare phase if it can't set the attr due to lack of resources or support, within it's control. RTNL lock must be held across both phases because we'll recurse all lower devs first in prepare phase, and then recurse all lower devs again in commit phase. If any lower dev fails the prepare phase, we need to abort the transaction for all lower devs. If lower dev recusion isn't desired, allow a flag SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE to indicate get/set only work on port (lowest) device. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:48 -07:00
net: switchdev: Replace port attr set SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_attr_set. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_attr_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET and calls the blocking (process) notifier chain. We have one odd case within net/bridge/br_switchdev.c with the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier that requires executing from atomic context, we deal with that one specifically. Drop __switchdev_port_attr_set() and update switchdev_port_attr_set() likewise. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:31 -08:00
switchdev: introduce get/set attrs ops Add two new swdev ops for get/set switch port attributes. Most swdev interactions on a port are gets or sets on port attributes, so rather than adding ops for each attribute, let's define clean get/set ops for all attributes, and then we can have clear, consistent rules on how attributes propagate on stacked devs. Add the basic algorithms for get/set attr ops. Use the same recusive algo to walk lower devs we've used for STP updates, for example. For get, compare attr value for each lower dev and only return success if attr values match across all lower devs. For sets, set the same attr value for all lower devs. We'll use a two-phase prepare-commit transaction model for sets. In the first phase, the driver(s) are asked if attr set is OK. If all OK, the commit attr set in second phase. A driver would NACK the prepare phase if it can't set the attr due to lack of resources or support, within it's control. RTNL lock must be held across both phases because we'll recurse all lower devs first in prepare phase, and then recurse all lower devs again in commit phase. If any lower dev fails the prepare phase, we need to abort the transaction for all lower devs. If lower dev recusion isn't desired, allow a flag SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE to indicate get/set only work on port (lowest) device. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:48 -07:00
net: switchdev: Replace port attr set SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_attr_set. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_attr_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET and calls the blocking (process) notifier chain. We have one odd case within net/bridge/br_switchdev.c with the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier that requires executing from atomic context, we deal with that one specifically. Drop __switchdev_port_attr_set() and update switchdev_port_attr_set() likewise. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:31 -08:00
net: bridge: propagate extack through switchdev_port_attr_set The benefit is the ability to propagate errors from switchdev drivers for the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING and SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_PROTOCOL attributes. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:43:17 +02:00
net: switchdev: Replace port attr set SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_attr_set. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_attr_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET and calls the blocking (process) notifier chain. We have one odd case within net/bridge/br_switchdev.c with the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier that requires executing from atomic context, we deal with that one specifically. Drop __switchdev_port_attr_set() and update switchdev_port_attr_set() likewise. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:31 -08:00
switchdev: introduce get/set attrs ops Add two new swdev ops for get/set switch port attributes. Most swdev interactions on a port are gets or sets on port attributes, so rather than adding ops for each attribute, let's define clean get/set ops for all attributes, and then we can have clear, consistent rules on how attributes propagate on stacked devs. Add the basic algorithms for get/set attr ops. Use the same recusive algo to walk lower devs we've used for STP updates, for example. For get, compare attr value for each lower dev and only return success if attr values match across all lower devs. For sets, set the same attr value for all lower devs. We'll use a two-phase prepare-commit transaction model for sets. In the first phase, the driver(s) are asked if attr set is OK. If all OK, the commit attr set in second phase. A driver would NACK the prepare phase if it can't set the attr due to lack of resources or support, within it's control. RTNL lock must be held across both phases because we'll recurse all lower devs first in prepare phase, and then recurse all lower devs again in commit phase. If any lower dev fails the prepare phase, we need to abort the transaction for all lower devs. If lower dev recusion isn't desired, allow a flag SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE to indicate get/set only work on port (lowest) device. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:48 -07:00
net: switchdev: Replace port attr set SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_attr_set. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_attr_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET and calls the blocking (process) notifier chain. We have one odd case within net/bridge/br_switchdev.c with the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier that requires executing from atomic context, we deal with that one specifically. Drop __switchdev_port_attr_set() and update switchdev_port_attr_set() likewise. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:31 -08:00
switchdev: skip over ports returning -EOPNOTSUPP when recursing ports This allows us to recurse over all the ports, skipping over unsupporting ports. Without the change, the recursion would stop at first unsupported port. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-08 19:23:18 -07:00
net: switchdev: Replace port attr set SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_attr_set. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_attr_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET and calls the blocking (process) notifier chain. We have one odd case within net/bridge/br_switchdev.c with the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute identifier that requires executing from atomic context, we deal with that one specifically. Drop __switchdev_port_attr_set() and update switchdev_port_attr_set() likewise. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:31 -08:00
switchdev: introduce get/set attrs ops Add two new swdev ops for get/set switch port attributes. Most swdev interactions on a port are gets or sets on port attributes, so rather than adding ops for each attribute, let's define clean get/set ops for all attributes, and then we can have clear, consistent rules on how attributes propagate on stacked devs. Add the basic algorithms for get/set attr ops. Use the same recusive algo to walk lower devs we've used for STP updates, for example. For get, compare attr value for each lower dev and only return success if attr values match across all lower devs. For sets, set the same attr value for all lower devs. We'll use a two-phase prepare-commit transaction model for sets. In the first phase, the driver(s) are asked if attr set is OK. If all OK, the commit attr set in second phase. A driver would NACK the prepare phase if it can't set the attr due to lack of resources or support, within it's control. RTNL lock must be held across both phases because we'll recurse all lower devs first in prepare phase, and then recurse all lower devs again in commit phase. If any lower dev fails the prepare phase, we need to abort the transaction for all lower devs. If lower dev recusion isn't desired, allow a flag SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE to indicate get/set only work on port (lowest) device. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:48 -07:00
switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL) or if he has to defer the att_set processing for later. This also allows drivers to sleep inside attr_set and report operation status back to switchdev core. Switchdev core then warns if status is not ok, instead of silent errors happening in drivers. Benefit from newly introduced switchdev deferred ops infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:50 +02:00
net: bridge: propagate extack through switchdev_port_attr_set The benefit is the ability to propagate errors from switchdev drivers for the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING and SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_PROTOCOL attributes. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:43:17 +02:00
switchdev: introduce get/set attrs ops Add two new swdev ops for get/set switch port attributes. Most swdev interactions on a port are gets or sets on port attributes, so rather than adding ops for each attribute, let's define clean get/set ops for all attributes, and then we can have clear, consistent rules on how attributes propagate on stacked devs. Add the basic algorithms for get/set attr ops. Use the same recusive algo to walk lower devs we've used for STP updates, for example. For get, compare attr value for each lower dev and only return success if attr values match across all lower devs. For sets, set the same attr value for all lower devs. We'll use a two-phase prepare-commit transaction model for sets. In the first phase, the driver(s) are asked if attr set is OK. If all OK, the commit attr set in second phase. A driver would NACK the prepare phase if it can't set the attr due to lack of resources or support, within it's control. RTNL lock must be held across both phases because we'll recurse all lower devs first in prepare phase, and then recurse all lower devs again in commit phase. If any lower dev fails the prepare phase, we need to abort the transaction for all lower devs. If lower dev recusion isn't desired, allow a flag SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE to indicate get/set only work on port (lowest) device. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:48 -07:00
net: bridge: propagate extack through switchdev_port_attr_set The benefit is the ability to propagate errors from switchdev drivers for the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING and SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_PROTOCOL attributes. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:43:17 +02:00
switchdev: introduce get/set attrs ops Add two new swdev ops for get/set switch port attributes. Most swdev interactions on a port are gets or sets on port attributes, so rather than adding ops for each attribute, let's define clean get/set ops for all attributes, and then we can have clear, consistent rules on how attributes propagate on stacked devs. Add the basic algorithms for get/set attr ops. Use the same recusive algo to walk lower devs we've used for STP updates, for example. For get, compare attr value for each lower dev and only return success if attr values match across all lower devs. For sets, set the same attr value for all lower devs. We'll use a two-phase prepare-commit transaction model for sets. In the first phase, the driver(s) are asked if attr set is OK. If all OK, the commit attr set in second phase. A driver would NACK the prepare phase if it can't set the attr due to lack of resources or support, within it's control. RTNL lock must be held across both phases because we'll recurse all lower devs first in prepare phase, and then recurse all lower devs again in commit phase. If any lower dev fails the prepare phase, we need to abort the transaction for all lower devs. If lower dev recusion isn't desired, allow a flag SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE to indicate get/set only work on port (lowest) device. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:48 -07:00
switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL) or if he has to defer the att_set processing for later. This also allows drivers to sleep inside attr_set and report operation status back to switchdev core. Switchdev core then warns if status is not ok, instead of silent errors happening in drivers. Benefit from newly introduced switchdev deferred ops infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:50 +02:00
net: bridge: propagate extack through switchdev_port_attr_set The benefit is the ability to propagate errors from switchdev drivers for the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING and SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_PROTOCOL attributes. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:43:17 +02:00
switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL) or if he has to defer the att_set processing for later. This also allows drivers to sleep inside attr_set and report operation status back to switchdev core. Switchdev core then warns if status is not ok, instead of silent errors happening in drivers. Benefit from newly introduced switchdev deferred ops infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:50 +02:00
switchdev: Adding complete operation to deferred switchdev ops When using switchdev deferred operation (SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER), the operation is executed in different context and the application doesn't have any way to get the operation real status. Adding a completion callback fixes that. This patch adds fields to switchdev_attr and switchdev_obj "complete_priv" field which is used by the "complete" callback. Application can set a complete function which will be called once the operation executed. Signed-off-by: Elad Raz <eladr@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-04-21 12:52:43 +02:00
switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL) or if he has to defer the att_set processing for later. This also allows drivers to sleep inside attr_set and report operation status back to switchdev core. Switchdev core then warns if status is not ok, instead of silent errors happening in drivers. Benefit from newly introduced switchdev deferred ops infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:50 +02:00
net: bridge: propagate extack through switchdev_port_attr_set The benefit is the ability to propagate errors from switchdev drivers for the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING and SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_PROTOCOL attributes. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:43:17 +02:00
switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL) or if he has to defer the att_set processing for later. This also allows drivers to sleep inside attr_set and report operation status back to switchdev core. Switchdev core then warns if status is not ok, instead of silent errors happening in drivers. Benefit from newly introduced switchdev deferred ops infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:50 +02:00
net: bridge: propagate extack through switchdev_port_attr_set The benefit is the ability to propagate errors from switchdev drivers for the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING and SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_PROTOCOL attributes. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:43:17 +02:00
switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL) or if he has to defer the att_set processing for later. This also allows drivers to sleep inside attr_set and report operation status back to switchdev core. Switchdev core then warns if status is not ok, instead of silent errors happening in drivers. Benefit from newly introduced switchdev deferred ops infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:50 +02:00
net: bridge: propagate extack through switchdev_port_attr_set The benefit is the ability to propagate errors from switchdev drivers for the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING and SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_PROTOCOL attributes. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:43:17 +02:00
switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL) or if he has to defer the att_set processing for later. This also allows drivers to sleep inside attr_set and report operation status back to switchdev core. Switchdev core then warns if status is not ok, instead of silent errors happening in drivers. Benefit from newly introduced switchdev deferred ops infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:50 +02:00
switchdev: introduce get/set attrs ops Add two new swdev ops for get/set switch port attributes. Most swdev interactions on a port are gets or sets on port attributes, so rather than adding ops for each attribute, let's define clean get/set ops for all attributes, and then we can have clear, consistent rules on how attributes propagate on stacked devs. Add the basic algorithms for get/set attr ops. Use the same recusive algo to walk lower devs we've used for STP updates, for example. For get, compare attr value for each lower dev and only return success if attr values match across all lower devs. For sets, set the same attr value for all lower devs. We'll use a two-phase prepare-commit transaction model for sets. In the first phase, the driver(s) are asked if attr set is OK. If all OK, the commit attr set in second phase. A driver would NACK the prepare phase if it can't set the attr due to lack of resources or support, within it's control. RTNL lock must be held across both phases because we'll recurse all lower devs first in prepare phase, and then recurse all lower devs again in commit phase. If any lower dev fails the prepare phase, we need to abort the transaction for all lower devs. If lower dev recusion isn't desired, allow a flag SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE to indicate get/set only work on port (lowest) device. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:48 -07:00
switchdev: fix: pass correct obj size when deferring obj add Fixes: 4d429c5dd ("switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del") Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-28 23:17:31 -07:00
switchdev: Adding MDB entry offload Define HW multicast entry: MAC and VID. Using a MAC address simplifies support for both IPV4 and IPv6. Signed-off-by: Elad Raz <eladr@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-01-10 21:06:22 +01:00
net: bridge: Add/del switchdev object on host join/leave When the host joins or leaves a multicast group, use switchdev to add an object to the hardware to forward traffic for the group to the host. Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-11-09 23:10:59 +01:00
switchdev: fix: pass correct obj size when deferring obj add Fixes: 4d429c5dd ("switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del") Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-28 23:17:31 -07:00
switchdev: Replace port obj add/del SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_obj_add and _del. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_obj_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and _DEL. Update switchdev_port_obj_del_now() to dispatch to this new function. Drop __switchdev_port_obj_add() and update switchdev_port_obj_add() likewise. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:32:57 +00:00
net: switchdev: Add extack argument to switchdev_port_obj_add() After the previous patch, bridge driver has extack argument available to pass to switchdev. Therefore extend switchdev_port_obj_add() with this argument, updating all callers, and passing the argument through to switchdev_port_obj_notify(). Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-12 17:02:52 +00:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev add/del obj ops Like switchdev attr get/set, add new switchdev obj add/del. switchdev objs will be things like VLANs or FIB entries, so add/del fits better for objects than get/set used for attributes. Use same two-phase prepare-commit transaction model as in attr set. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:52 -07:00
switchdev: Replace port obj add/del SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_obj_add and _del. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_obj_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and _DEL. Update switchdev_port_obj_del_now() to dispatch to this new function. Drop __switchdev_port_obj_add() and update switchdev_port_obj_add() likewise. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:32:57 +00:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev add/del obj ops Like switchdev attr get/set, add new switchdev obj add/del. switchdev objs will be things like VLANs or FIB entries, so add/del fits better for objects than get/set used for attributes. Use same two-phase prepare-commit transaction model as in attr set. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:52 -07:00
switchdev: Replace port obj add/del SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_obj_add and _del. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_obj_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and _DEL. Update switchdev_port_obj_del_now() to dispatch to this new function. Drop __switchdev_port_obj_add() and update switchdev_port_obj_add() likewise. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:32:57 +00:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev add/del obj ops Like switchdev attr get/set, add new switchdev obj add/del. switchdev objs will be things like VLANs or FIB entries, so add/del fits better for objects than get/set used for attributes. Use same two-phase prepare-commit transaction model as in attr set. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:52 -07:00
net: switchdev: Add extack to struct switchdev_notifier_info In order to pass extack to the drivers that need it, add an extack field to struct switchdev_notifier_info, and an extack argument to the function call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers(). Also add a helper function switchdev_notifier_info_to_extack(). Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-12 17:02:54 +00:00
switchdev: Replace port obj add/del SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_obj_add and _del. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_obj_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and _DEL. Update switchdev_port_obj_del_now() to dispatch to this new function. Drop __switchdev_port_obj_add() and update switchdev_port_obj_add() likewise. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:32:57 +00:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev add/del obj ops Like switchdev attr get/set, add new switchdev obj add/del. switchdev objs will be things like VLANs or FIB entries, so add/del fits better for objects than get/set used for attributes. Use same two-phase prepare-commit transaction model as in attr set. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:52 -07:00
switchdev: Replace port obj add/del SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_obj_add and _del. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_obj_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and _DEL. Update switchdev_port_obj_del_now() to dispatch to this new function. Drop __switchdev_port_obj_add() and update switchdev_port_obj_add() likewise. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:32:57 +00:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev add/del obj ops Like switchdev attr get/set, add new switchdev obj add/del. switchdev objs will be things like VLANs or FIB entries, so add/del fits better for objects than get/set used for attributes. Use same two-phase prepare-commit transaction model as in attr set. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:52 -07:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
net: switchdev: delete switchdev_port_obj_add_now After the removal of the transactional model inside switchdev_port_obj_add_now, it has no added value and we can just call switchdev_port_obj_notify directly, bypassing this function. Let's delete it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-09 02:01:49 +02:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
switchdev: Adding complete operation to deferred switchdev ops When using switchdev deferred operation (SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER), the operation is executed in different context and the application doesn't have any way to get the operation real status. Adding a completion callback fixes that. This patch adds fields to switchdev_attr and switchdev_obj "complete_priv" field which is used by the "complete" callback. Application can set a complete function which will be called once the operation executed. Signed-off-by: Elad Raz <eladr@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-04-21 12:52:43 +02:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
switchdev: fix: pass correct obj size when deferring obj add Fixes: 4d429c5dd ("switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del") Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-28 23:17:31 -07:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev add/del obj ops Like switchdev attr get/set, add new switchdev obj add/del. switchdev objs will be things like VLANs or FIB entries, so add/del fits better for objects than get/set used for attributes. Use same two-phase prepare-commit transaction model as in attr set. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:52 -07:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev add/del obj ops Like switchdev attr get/set, add new switchdev obj add/del. switchdev objs will be things like VLANs or FIB entries, so add/del fits better for objects than get/set used for attributes. Use same two-phase prepare-commit transaction model as in attr set. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:52 -07:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
net: switchdev: kerneldoc fixes Simple fixes which require no deep knowledge of the code. Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-07-13 01:15:13 +02:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev add/del obj ops Like switchdev attr get/set, add new switchdev obj add/del. switchdev objs will be things like VLANs or FIB entries, so add/del fits better for objects than get/set used for attributes. Use same two-phase prepare-commit transaction model as in attr set. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:52 -07:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
net: switchdev: Add extack argument to switchdev_port_obj_add() After the previous patch, bridge driver has extack argument available to pass to switchdev. Therefore extend switchdev_port_obj_add() with this argument, updating all callers, and passing the argument through to switchdev_port_obj_notify(). Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-12 17:02:52 +00:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
net: switchdev: delete switchdev_port_obj_add_now After the removal of the transactional model inside switchdev_port_obj_add_now, it has no added value and we can just call switchdev_port_obj_notify directly, bypassing this function. Let's delete it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-09 02:01:49 +02:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev add/del obj ops Like switchdev attr get/set, add new switchdev obj add/del. switchdev objs will be things like VLANs or FIB entries, so add/del fits better for objects than get/set used for attributes. Use same two-phase prepare-commit transaction model as in attr set. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:52 -07:00
switchdev: Replace port obj add/del SDO with a notification Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_obj_add and _del. Drop the uses of this field from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in the previous patches. Add a new function switchdev_port_obj_notify() that sends the switchdev notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and _DEL. Update switchdev_port_obj_del_now() to dispatch to this new function. Drop __switchdev_port_obj_add() and update switchdev_port_obj_add() likewise. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:32:57 +00:00
net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port object notifiers Since the introduction of the switchdev API, port objects were transmitted to drivers for offloading using a two-step transactional model, with a prepare phase that was supposed to catch all errors, and a commit phase that was supposed to never fail. Some classes of failures can never be avoided, like hardware access, or memory allocation. In the latter case, merely attempting to move the memory allocation to the preparation phase makes it impossible to avoid memory leaks, since commit 91cf8eceffc1 ("switchdev: Remove unused transaction item queue") which has removed the unused mechanism of passing on the allocated memory between one phase and another. It is time we admit that separating the preparation from the commit phase is something that is best left for the driver to decide, and not something that should be baked into the API, especially since there are no switchdev callers that depend on this. This patch removes the struct switchdev_trans member from switchdev port object notifier structures, and converts drivers to not look at this member. Where driver conversion is trivial (like in the case of the Marvell Prestera driver, NXP DPAA2 switch, TI CPSW, and Rocker drivers), it is done in this patch. Where driver conversion needs more attention (DSA, Mellanox Spectrum), the conversion is left for subsequent patches and here we only fake the prepare/commit phases at a lower level, just not in the switchdev notifier itself. Where the code has a natural structure that is best left alone as a preparation and a commit phase (as in the case of the Ocelot switch), that structure is left in place, just made to not depend upon the switchdev transactional model. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-09 02:01:48 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev add/del obj ops Like switchdev attr get/set, add new switchdev obj add/del. switchdev objs will be things like VLANs or FIB entries, so add/del fits better for objects than get/set used for attributes. Use same two-phase prepare-commit transaction model as in attr set. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:52 -07:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
switchdev: Adding complete operation to deferred switchdev ops When using switchdev deferred operation (SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER), the operation is executed in different context and the application doesn't have any way to get the operation real status. Adding a completion callback fixes that. This patch adds fields to switchdev_attr and switchdev_obj "complete_priv" field which is used by the "complete" callback. Application can set a complete function which will be called once the operation executed. Signed-off-by: Elad Raz <eladr@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-04-21 12:52:43 +02:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
switchdev: fix: pass correct obj size when deferring obj add Fixes: 4d429c5dd ("switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del") Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-28 23:17:31 -07:00
switchdev: introduce possibility to defer obj_add/del Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant. This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core. This avoids silent errors in drivers. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-10-14 19:40:52 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev add/del obj ops Like switchdev attr get/set, add new switchdev obj add/del. switchdev objs will be things like VLANs or FIB entries, so add/del fits better for objects than get/set used for attributes. Use same two-phase prepare-commit transaction model as in attr set. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:52 -07:00
net: switchdev: Change notifier chain to be atomic In order to use the switchdev notifier chain for FDB sync with the device it has to be changed to atomic. The is done because the bridge can learn new FDBs in atomic context. Signed-off-by: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-08 08:44:13 +02:00
switchdev: Add a blocking notifier chain In general one can't assume that a switchdev notifier is called in a non-atomic context, and correspondingly, the switchdev notifier chain is an atomic one. However, port object addition and deletion messages are delivered from a process context. Even the MDB addition messages, whose delivery is scheduled from atomic context, are queued and the delivery itself takes place in blocking context. For VLAN messages in particular, keeping the blocking nature is important for error reporting. Therefore introduce a blocking notifier chain and related service functions to distribute the notifications for which a blocking context can be assumed. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:28:25 +00:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
switchdev: s/netdev_switch_/switchdev_/ and s/NETDEV_SWITCH_/SWITCHDEV_/ Turned out that "switchdev" sticks. So just unify all related terms to use this prefix. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:46 -07:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
net: switchdev: Change notifier chain to be atomic In order to use the switchdev notifier chain for FDB sync with the device it has to be changed to atomic. The is done because the bridge can learn new FDBs in atomic context. Signed-off-by: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-08 08:44:13 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
switchdev: s/netdev_switch_/switchdev_/ and s/NETDEV_SWITCH_/SWITCHDEV_/ Turned out that "switchdev" sticks. So just unify all related terms to use this prefix. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:46 -07:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
net: switchdev: Change notifier chain to be atomic In order to use the switchdev notifier chain for FDB sync with the device it has to be changed to atomic. The is done because the bridge can learn new FDBs in atomic context. Signed-off-by: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-08 08:44:13 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
switchdev: s/netdev_switch_/switchdev_/ and s/NETDEV_SWITCH_/SWITCHDEV_/ Turned out that "switchdev" sticks. So just unify all related terms to use this prefix. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:46 -07:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
switchdev: s/netdev_switch_/switchdev_/ and s/NETDEV_SWITCH_/SWITCHDEV_/ Turned out that "switchdev" sticks. So just unify all related terms to use this prefix. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:46 -07:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
switchdev: s/netdev_switch_/switchdev_/ and s/NETDEV_SWITCH_/SWITCHDEV_/ Turned out that "switchdev" sticks. So just unify all related terms to use this prefix. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:46 -07:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
net: switchdev: Change notifier chain to be atomic In order to use the switchdev notifier chain for FDB sync with the device it has to be changed to atomic. The is done because the bridge can learn new FDBs in atomic context. Signed-off-by: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-08 08:44:13 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
switchdev: s/netdev_switch_/switchdev_/ and s/NETDEV_SWITCH_/SWITCHDEV_/ Turned out that "switchdev" sticks. So just unify all related terms to use this prefix. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:46 -07:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
switchdev: s/netdev_switch_/switchdev_/ and s/NETDEV_SWITCH_/SWITCHDEV_/ Turned out that "switchdev" sticks. So just unify all related terms to use this prefix. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:46 -07:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
net: switchdev: Fixed kerneldoc warning Update kernel-doc line comments to fix warnings reported by make W=1. net/switchdev/switchdev.c:413: warning: Function parameter or member 'extack' not described in 'call_switchdev_notifiers' Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-09-22 21:32:19 +08:00
net: switchdev: Change notifier chain to be atomic In order to use the switchdev notifier chain for FDB sync with the device it has to be changed to atomic. The is done because the bridge can learn new FDBs in atomic context. Signed-off-by: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-08 08:44:13 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
switchdev: s/netdev_switch_/switchdev_/ and s/NETDEV_SWITCH_/SWITCHDEV_/ Turned out that "switchdev" sticks. So just unify all related terms to use this prefix. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:46 -07:00
switchdev: Add extack argument to call_switchdev_notifiers() A follow-up patch will enable vetoing of FDB entries. Make it possible to communicate details of why an FDB entry is not acceptable back to the user. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-01-16 23:06:56 +00:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
switchdev: Add extack argument to call_switchdev_notifiers() A follow-up patch will enable vetoing of FDB entries. Make it possible to communicate details of why an FDB entry is not acceptable back to the user. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-01-16 23:06:56 +00:00
net: switchdev: Change notifier chain to be atomic In order to use the switchdev notifier chain for FDB sync with the device it has to be changed to atomic. The is done because the bridge can learn new FDBs in atomic context. Signed-off-by: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-08 08:44:13 +02:00
switchdev: introduce switchdev notifier This patch introduces new notifier for purposes of exposing events which happen on switch driver side. The consumers of the event messages are mainly involved masters, namely bridge and ovs. Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-15 23:49:36 +01:00
switchdev: s/netdev_switch_/switchdev_/ and s/NETDEV_SWITCH_/SWITCHDEV_/ Turned out that "switchdev" sticks. So just unify all related terms to use this prefix. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-05-10 09:47:46 -07:00
swdevice: add new apis to set and del bridge port attributes This patch adds two new api's netdev_switch_port_bridge_setlink and netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink to offload bridge port attributes to switch port (The names of the apis look odd with 'switch_port_bridge', but am more inclined to change the prefix of the api to something else. Will take any suggestions). The api's look at the NETIF_F_HW_SWITCH_OFFLOAD feature flag to pass bridge port attributes to the port device. Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-01-29 22:40:13 -08:00
switchdev: Add a blocking notifier chain In general one can't assume that a switchdev notifier is called in a non-atomic context, and correspondingly, the switchdev notifier chain is an atomic one. However, port object addition and deletion messages are delivered from a process context. Even the MDB addition messages, whose delivery is scheduled from atomic context, are queued and the delivery itself takes place in blocking context. For VLAN messages in particular, keeping the blocking nature is important for error reporting. Therefore introduce a blocking notifier chain and related service functions to distribute the notifications for which a blocking context can be assumed. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:28:25 +00:00
net: switchdev: Add extack to struct switchdev_notifier_info In order to pass extack to the drivers that need it, add an extack field to struct switchdev_notifier_info, and an extack argument to the function call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers(). Also add a helper function switchdev_notifier_info_to_extack(). Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-12 17:02:54 +00:00
switchdev: Add a blocking notifier chain In general one can't assume that a switchdev notifier is called in a non-atomic context, and correspondingly, the switchdev notifier chain is an atomic one. However, port object addition and deletion messages are delivered from a process context. Even the MDB addition messages, whose delivery is scheduled from atomic context, are queued and the delivery itself takes place in blocking context. For VLAN messages in particular, keeping the blocking nature is important for error reporting. Therefore introduce a blocking notifier chain and related service functions to distribute the notifications for which a blocking context can be assumed. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:28:25 +00:00
net: switchdev: Add extack to struct switchdev_notifier_info In order to pass extack to the drivers that need it, add an extack field to struct switchdev_notifier_info, and an extack argument to the function call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers(). Also add a helper function switchdev_notifier_info_to_extack(). Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-12 17:02:54 +00:00
switchdev: Add a blocking notifier chain In general one can't assume that a switchdev notifier is called in a non-atomic context, and correspondingly, the switchdev notifier chain is an atomic one. However, port object addition and deletion messages are delivered from a process context. Even the MDB addition messages, whose delivery is scheduled from atomic context, are queued and the delivery itself takes place in blocking context. For VLAN messages in particular, keeping the blocking nature is important for error reporting. Therefore introduce a blocking notifier chain and related service functions to distribute the notifications for which a blocking context can be assumed. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:28:25 +00:00
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:29:44 +00:00
net: switchdev: Add extack to switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() callback Drivers use switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() to handle recursive descent through lower devices. Change this function prototype to take add_cb that itself takes an extack argument. Decode extack from switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info and pass it to add_cb. Update mlxsw and ocelot drivers which use this helper. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-12 17:02:56 +00:00
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:29:44 +00:00
net: switchdev: Add extack to switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() callback Drivers use switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() to handle recursive descent through lower devices. Change this function prototype to take add_cb that itself takes an extack argument. Decode extack from switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info and pass it to add_cb. Update mlxsw and ocelot drivers which use this helper. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-12 17:02:56 +00:00
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:29:44 +00:00
net: switchdev: Add extack to switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() callback Drivers use switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() to handle recursive descent through lower devices. Change this function prototype to take add_cb that itself takes an extack argument. Decode extack from switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info and pass it to add_cb. Update mlxsw and ocelot drivers which use this helper. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-12 17:02:56 +00:00
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:29:44 +00:00
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net drivers/net/can/dev.c b552766c872f ("can: dev: prevent potential information leak in can_fill_info()") 3e77f70e7345 ("can: dev: move driver related infrastructure into separate subdir") 0a042c6ec991 ("can: dev: move netlink related code into seperate file") Code move. drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c 57ac4a31c483 ("net/mlx5e: Correctly handle changing the number of queues when the interface is down") 214baf22870c ("net/mlx5e: Support HTB offload") Adjacent code changes net/switchdev/switchdev.c 20776b465c0c ("net: switchdev: don't set port_obj_info->handled true when -EOPNOTSUPP") ffb68fc58e96 ("net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port object notifiers") bae33f2b5afe ("net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port attributes") Transaction parameter gets dropped otherwise keep the fix. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-28 17:09:31 -08:00
net: switchdev: don't set port_obj_info->handled true when -EOPNOTSUPP It's not true that switchdev_port_obj_notify() only inspects the ->handled field of "struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info" if call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers() returns 0 - there's a WARN_ON() triggering for a non-zero return combined with ->handled not being true. But the real problem here is that -EOPNOTSUPP is not being properly handled. The wrapper functions switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() et al change a return value of -EOPNOTSUPP to 0, and the treatment of ->handled in switchdev_port_obj_notify() seems to be designed to change that back to -EOPNOTSUPP in case nobody actually acted on the notifier (i.e., everybody returned -EOPNOTSUPP). Currently, as soon as some device down the stack passes the check_cb() check, ->handled gets set to true, which means that switchdev_port_obj_notify() cannot actually ever return -EOPNOTSUPP. This, for example, means that the detection of hardware offload support in the MRP code is broken: switchdev_port_obj_add() used by br_mrp_switchdev_send_ring_test() always returns 0, so since the MRP code thinks the generation of MRP test frames has been offloaded, no such frames are actually put on the wire. Similarly, br_mrp_switchdev_set_ring_role() also always returns 0, causing mrp->ring_role_offloaded to be set to 1. To fix this, continue to set ->handled true if any callback returns success or any error distinct from -EOPNOTSUPP. But if all the callbacks return -EOPNOTSUPP, make sure that ->handled stays false, so the logic in switchdev_port_obj_notify() can propagate that information. Fixes: 9a9f26e8f7ea ("bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchdev API") Fixes: f30f0601eb93 ("switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices") Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125124116.102928-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-25 13:41:16 +01:00
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:29:44 +00:00
net: switchdev: do not propagate bridge updates across bridges When configuring a tree of independent bridges, propagating changes from the upper bridge across a bridge master to the lower bridge ports brings surprises. For example, a lower bridge may have vlan filtering enabled. It may have a vlan interface attached to the bridge master, which may then be incorporated into another bridge. As soon as the lower bridge vlan interface is attached to the upper bridge, the lower bridge has vlan filtering disabled. This occurs because switchdev recursively applies its changes to all lower devices no matter what. Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-02-26 17:14:21 +00:00
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:29:44 +00:00
net: switchdev: Add extack to switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() callback Drivers use switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() to handle recursive descent through lower devices. Change this function prototype to take add_cb that itself takes an extack argument. Decode extack from switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info and pass it to add_cb. Update mlxsw and ocelot drivers which use this helper. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-12 17:02:56 +00:00
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:29:44 +00:00
net: switchdev: don't set port_obj_info->handled true when -EOPNOTSUPP It's not true that switchdev_port_obj_notify() only inspects the ->handled field of "struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info" if call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers() returns 0 - there's a WARN_ON() triggering for a non-zero return combined with ->handled not being true. But the real problem here is that -EOPNOTSUPP is not being properly handled. The wrapper functions switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() et al change a return value of -EOPNOTSUPP to 0, and the treatment of ->handled in switchdev_port_obj_notify() seems to be designed to change that back to -EOPNOTSUPP in case nobody actually acted on the notifier (i.e., everybody returned -EOPNOTSUPP). Currently, as soon as some device down the stack passes the check_cb() check, ->handled gets set to true, which means that switchdev_port_obj_notify() cannot actually ever return -EOPNOTSUPP. This, for example, means that the detection of hardware offload support in the MRP code is broken: switchdev_port_obj_add() used by br_mrp_switchdev_send_ring_test() always returns 0, so since the MRP code thinks the generation of MRP test frames has been offloaded, no such frames are actually put on the wire. Similarly, br_mrp_switchdev_set_ring_role() also always returns 0, causing mrp->ring_role_offloaded to be set to 1. To fix this, continue to set ->handled true if any callback returns success or any error distinct from -EOPNOTSUPP. But if all the callbacks return -EOPNOTSUPP, make sure that ->handled stays false, so the logic in switchdev_port_obj_notify() can propagate that information. Fixes: 9a9f26e8f7ea ("bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchdev API") Fixes: f30f0601eb93 ("switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices") Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125124116.102928-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-25 13:41:16 +01:00
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:29:44 +00:00
net: switchdev: do not propagate bridge updates across bridges When configuring a tree of independent bridges, propagating changes from the upper bridge across a bridge master to the lower bridge ports brings surprises. For example, a lower bridge may have vlan filtering enabled. It may have a vlan interface attached to the bridge master, which may then be incorporated into another bridge. As soon as the lower bridge vlan interface is attached to the upper bridge, the lower bridge has vlan filtering disabled. This occurs because switchdev recursively applies its changes to all lower devices no matter what. Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-02-26 17:14:21 +00:00
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-22 23:29:44 +00:00
switchdev: Add SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET In preparation for allowing switchdev enabled drivers to veto specific attribute settings from within the context of the caller, introduce a new switchdev notifier type for port attributes. Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:25 -08:00
net: switchdev: propagate extack to port attributes When a struct switchdev_attr is notified through switchdev, there is no way to report informational messages, unlike for struct switchdev_obj. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-12 17:15:51 +02:00
switchdev: Add SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET In preparation for allowing switchdev enabled drivers to veto specific attribute settings from within the context of the caller, introduce a new switchdev notifier type for port attributes. Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:25 -08:00
net: switchdev: propagate extack to port attributes When a struct switchdev_attr is notified through switchdev, there is no way to report informational messages, unlike for struct switchdev_obj. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-12 17:15:51 +02:00
switchdev: Add SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET In preparation for allowing switchdev enabled drivers to veto specific attribute settings from within the context of the caller, introduce a new switchdev notifier type for port attributes. Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:25 -08:00
net: switchdev: propagate extack to port attributes When a struct switchdev_attr is notified through switchdev, there is no way to report informational messages, unlike for struct switchdev_obj. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-12 17:15:51 +02:00
switchdev: Add SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET In preparation for allowing switchdev enabled drivers to veto specific attribute settings from within the context of the caller, introduce a new switchdev notifier type for port attributes. Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:25 -08:00
net: switchdev: propagate extack to port attributes When a struct switchdev_attr is notified through switchdev, there is no way to report informational messages, unlike for struct switchdev_obj. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-12 17:15:51 +02:00
net: switchdev: don't set port_obj_info->handled true when -EOPNOTSUPP It's not true that switchdev_port_obj_notify() only inspects the ->handled field of "struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info" if call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers() returns 0 - there's a WARN_ON() triggering for a non-zero return combined with ->handled not being true. But the real problem here is that -EOPNOTSUPP is not being properly handled. The wrapper functions switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() et al change a return value of -EOPNOTSUPP to 0, and the treatment of ->handled in switchdev_port_obj_notify() seems to be designed to change that back to -EOPNOTSUPP in case nobody actually acted on the notifier (i.e., everybody returned -EOPNOTSUPP). Currently, as soon as some device down the stack passes the check_cb() check, ->handled gets set to true, which means that switchdev_port_obj_notify() cannot actually ever return -EOPNOTSUPP. This, for example, means that the detection of hardware offload support in the MRP code is broken: switchdev_port_obj_add() used by br_mrp_switchdev_send_ring_test() always returns 0, so since the MRP code thinks the generation of MRP test frames has been offloaded, no such frames are actually put on the wire. Similarly, br_mrp_switchdev_set_ring_role() also always returns 0, causing mrp->ring_role_offloaded to be set to 1. To fix this, continue to set ->handled true if any callback returns success or any error distinct from -EOPNOTSUPP. But if all the callbacks return -EOPNOTSUPP, make sure that ->handled stays false, so the logic in switchdev_port_obj_notify() can propagate that information. Fixes: 9a9f26e8f7ea ("bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchdev API") Fixes: f30f0601eb93 ("switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices") Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125124116.102928-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-25 13:41:16 +01:00
switchdev: Add SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET In preparation for allowing switchdev enabled drivers to veto specific attribute settings from within the context of the caller, introduce a new switchdev notifier type for port attributes. Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:25 -08:00
net: switchdev: do not propagate bridge updates across bridges When configuring a tree of independent bridges, propagating changes from the upper bridge across a bridge master to the lower bridge ports brings surprises. For example, a lower bridge may have vlan filtering enabled. It may have a vlan interface attached to the bridge master, which may then be incorporated into another bridge. As soon as the lower bridge vlan interface is attached to the upper bridge, the lower bridge has vlan filtering disabled. This occurs because switchdev recursively applies its changes to all lower devices no matter what. Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-02-26 17:14:21 +00:00
switchdev: Add SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET In preparation for allowing switchdev enabled drivers to veto specific attribute settings from within the context of the caller, introduce a new switchdev notifier type for port attributes. Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:25 -08:00
net: switchdev: propagate extack to port attributes When a struct switchdev_attr is notified through switchdev, there is no way to report informational messages, unlike for struct switchdev_obj. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-12 17:15:51 +02:00
switchdev: Add SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET In preparation for allowing switchdev enabled drivers to veto specific attribute settings from within the context of the caller, introduce a new switchdev notifier type for port attributes. Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-27 11:44:25 -08:00