linux/drivers/char/Kconfig

468 lines
16 KiB

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 15:07:57 +01:00
random: credit cpu and bootloader seeds by default This commit changes the default Kconfig values of RANDOM_TRUST_CPU and RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER to be Y by default. It does not change any existing configs or change any kernel behavior. The reason for this is several fold. As background, I recently had an email thread with the kernel maintainers of Fedora/RHEL, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Arch, NixOS, Alpine, SUSE, and Void as recipients. I noted that some distros trust RDRAND, some trust EFI, and some trust both, and I asked why or why not. There wasn't really much of a "debate" but rather an interesting discussion of what the historical reasons have been for this, and it came up that some distros just missed the introduction of the bootloader Kconfig knob, while another didn't want to enable it until there was a boot time switch to turn it off for more concerned users (which has since been added). The result of the rather uneventful discussion is that every major Linux distro enables these two options by default. While I didn't have really too strong of an opinion going into this thread -- and I mostly wanted to learn what the distros' thinking was one way or another -- ultimately I think their choice was a decent enough one for a default option (which can be disabled at boot time). I'll try to summarize the pros and cons: Pros: - The RNG machinery gets initialized super quickly, and there's no messing around with subsequent blocking behavior. - The bootloader mechanism is used by kexec in order for the prior kernel to initialize the RNG of the next kernel, which increases the entropy available to early boot daemons of the next kernel. - Previous objections related to backdoors centered around Dual_EC_DRBG-like kleptographic systems, in which observing some amount of the output stream enables an adversary holding the right key to determine the entire output stream. This used to be a partially justified concern, because RDRAND output was mixed into the output stream in varying ways, some of which may have lacked pre-image resistance (e.g. XOR or an LFSR). But this is no longer the case. Now, all usage of RDRAND and bootloader seeds go through a cryptographic hash function. This means that the CPU would have to compute a hash pre-image, which is not considered to be feasible (otherwise the hash function would be terribly broken). - More generally, if the CPU is backdoored, the RNG is probably not the realistic vector of choice for an attacker. - These CPU or bootloader seeds are far from being the only source of entropy. Rather, there is generally a pretty huge amount of entropy, not all of which is credited, especially on CPUs that support instructions like RDRAND. In other words, assuming RDRAND outputs all zeros, an attacker would *still* have to accurately model every single other entropy source also in use. - The RNG now reseeds itself quite rapidly during boot, starting at 2 seconds, then 4, then 8, then 16, and so forth, so that other sources of entropy get used without much delay. - Paranoid users can set random.trust_{cpu,bootloader}=no in the kernel command line, and paranoid system builders can set the Kconfig options to N, so there's no reduction or restriction of optionality. - It's a practical default. - All the distros have it set this way. Microsoft and Apple trust it too. Bandwagon. Cons: - RDRAND *could* still be backdoored with something like a fixed key or limited space serial number seed or another indexable scheme like that. (However, it's hard to imagine threat models where the CPU is backdoored like this, yet people are still okay making *any* computations with it or connecting it to networks, etc.) - RDRAND *could* be defective, rather than backdoored, and produce garbage that is in one way or another insufficient for crypto. - Suggesting a *reduction* in paranoia, as this commit effectively does, may cause some to question my personal integrity as a "security person". - Bootloader seeds and RDRAND are generally very difficult if not all together impossible to audit. Keep in mind that this doesn't actually change any behavior. This is just a change in the default Kconfig value. The distros already are shipping kernels that set things this way. Ard made an additional argument in [1]: We're at the mercy of firmware and micro-architecture anyway, given that we are also relying on it to ensure that every instruction in the kernel's executable image has been faithfully copied to memory, and that the CPU implements those instructions as documented. So I don't think firmware or ISA bugs related to RNGs deserve special treatment - if they are broken, we should quirk around them like we usually do. So enabling these by default is a step in the right direction IMHO. In [2], Phil pointed out that having this disabled masked a bug that CI otherwise would have caught: A clean 5.15.45 boots cleanly, whereas a downstream kernel shows the static key warning (but it does go on to boot). The significant difference is that our defconfigs set CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER=y defining that on top of multi_v7_defconfig demonstrates the issue on a clean 5.15.45. Conversely, not setting that option in a downstream kernel build avoids the warning [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMj1kXGi+ieviFjXv9zQBSaGyyzeGW_VpMpTLJK8PJb2QHEQ-w@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c47c42e3-1d56-5859-a6ad-976a1a3381c6@raspberrypi.com/ Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
2022-06-05 18:30:46 +02:00
random: credit cpu and bootloader seeds by default This commit changes the default Kconfig values of RANDOM_TRUST_CPU and RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER to be Y by default. It does not change any existing configs or change any kernel behavior. The reason for this is several fold. As background, I recently had an email thread with the kernel maintainers of Fedora/RHEL, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Arch, NixOS, Alpine, SUSE, and Void as recipients. I noted that some distros trust RDRAND, some trust EFI, and some trust both, and I asked why or why not. There wasn't really much of a "debate" but rather an interesting discussion of what the historical reasons have been for this, and it came up that some distros just missed the introduction of the bootloader Kconfig knob, while another didn't want to enable it until there was a boot time switch to turn it off for more concerned users (which has since been added). The result of the rather uneventful discussion is that every major Linux distro enables these two options by default. While I didn't have really too strong of an opinion going into this thread -- and I mostly wanted to learn what the distros' thinking was one way or another -- ultimately I think their choice was a decent enough one for a default option (which can be disabled at boot time). I'll try to summarize the pros and cons: Pros: - The RNG machinery gets initialized super quickly, and there's no messing around with subsequent blocking behavior. - The bootloader mechanism is used by kexec in order for the prior kernel to initialize the RNG of the next kernel, which increases the entropy available to early boot daemons of the next kernel. - Previous objections related to backdoors centered around Dual_EC_DRBG-like kleptographic systems, in which observing some amount of the output stream enables an adversary holding the right key to determine the entire output stream. This used to be a partially justified concern, because RDRAND output was mixed into the output stream in varying ways, some of which may have lacked pre-image resistance (e.g. XOR or an LFSR). But this is no longer the case. Now, all usage of RDRAND and bootloader seeds go through a cryptographic hash function. This means that the CPU would have to compute a hash pre-image, which is not considered to be feasible (otherwise the hash function would be terribly broken). - More generally, if the CPU is backdoored, the RNG is probably not the realistic vector of choice for an attacker. - These CPU or bootloader seeds are far from being the only source of entropy. Rather, there is generally a pretty huge amount of entropy, not all of which is credited, especially on CPUs that support instructions like RDRAND. In other words, assuming RDRAND outputs all zeros, an attacker would *still* have to accurately model every single other entropy source also in use. - The RNG now reseeds itself quite rapidly during boot, starting at 2 seconds, then 4, then 8, then 16, and so forth, so that other sources of entropy get used without much delay. - Paranoid users can set random.trust_{cpu,bootloader}=no in the kernel command line, and paranoid system builders can set the Kconfig options to N, so there's no reduction or restriction of optionality. - It's a practical default. - All the distros have it set this way. Microsoft and Apple trust it too. Bandwagon. Cons: - RDRAND *could* still be backdoored with something like a fixed key or limited space serial number seed or another indexable scheme like that. (However, it's hard to imagine threat models where the CPU is backdoored like this, yet people are still okay making *any* computations with it or connecting it to networks, etc.) - RDRAND *could* be defective, rather than backdoored, and produce garbage that is in one way or another insufficient for crypto. - Suggesting a *reduction* in paranoia, as this commit effectively does, may cause some to question my personal integrity as a "security person". - Bootloader seeds and RDRAND are generally very difficult if not all together impossible to audit. Keep in mind that this doesn't actually change any behavior. This is just a change in the default Kconfig value. The distros already are shipping kernels that set things this way. Ard made an additional argument in [1]: We're at the mercy of firmware and micro-architecture anyway, given that we are also relying on it to ensure that every instruction in the kernel's executable image has been faithfully copied to memory, and that the CPU implements those instructions as documented. So I don't think firmware or ISA bugs related to RNGs deserve special treatment - if they are broken, we should quirk around them like we usually do. So enabling these by default is a step in the right direction IMHO. In [2], Phil pointed out that having this disabled masked a bug that CI otherwise would have caught: A clean 5.15.45 boots cleanly, whereas a downstream kernel shows the static key warning (but it does go on to boot). The significant difference is that our defconfigs set CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER=y defining that on top of multi_v7_defconfig demonstrates the issue on a clean 5.15.45. Conversely, not setting that option in a downstream kernel build avoids the warning [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMj1kXGi+ieviFjXv9zQBSaGyyzeGW_VpMpTLJK8PJb2QHEQ-w@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c47c42e3-1d56-5859-a6ad-976a1a3381c6@raspberrypi.com/ Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
2022-06-05 18:30:46 +02:00
random: credit cpu and bootloader seeds by default This commit changes the default Kconfig values of RANDOM_TRUST_CPU and RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER to be Y by default. It does not change any existing configs or change any kernel behavior. The reason for this is several fold. As background, I recently had an email thread with the kernel maintainers of Fedora/RHEL, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Arch, NixOS, Alpine, SUSE, and Void as recipients. I noted that some distros trust RDRAND, some trust EFI, and some trust both, and I asked why or why not. There wasn't really much of a "debate" but rather an interesting discussion of what the historical reasons have been for this, and it came up that some distros just missed the introduction of the bootloader Kconfig knob, while another didn't want to enable it until there was a boot time switch to turn it off for more concerned users (which has since been added). The result of the rather uneventful discussion is that every major Linux distro enables these two options by default. While I didn't have really too strong of an opinion going into this thread -- and I mostly wanted to learn what the distros' thinking was one way or another -- ultimately I think their choice was a decent enough one for a default option (which can be disabled at boot time). I'll try to summarize the pros and cons: Pros: - The RNG machinery gets initialized super quickly, and there's no messing around with subsequent blocking behavior. - The bootloader mechanism is used by kexec in order for the prior kernel to initialize the RNG of the next kernel, which increases the entropy available to early boot daemons of the next kernel. - Previous objections related to backdoors centered around Dual_EC_DRBG-like kleptographic systems, in which observing some amount of the output stream enables an adversary holding the right key to determine the entire output stream. This used to be a partially justified concern, because RDRAND output was mixed into the output stream in varying ways, some of which may have lacked pre-image resistance (e.g. XOR or an LFSR). But this is no longer the case. Now, all usage of RDRAND and bootloader seeds go through a cryptographic hash function. This means that the CPU would have to compute a hash pre-image, which is not considered to be feasible (otherwise the hash function would be terribly broken). - More generally, if the CPU is backdoored, the RNG is probably not the realistic vector of choice for an attacker. - These CPU or bootloader seeds are far from being the only source of entropy. Rather, there is generally a pretty huge amount of entropy, not all of which is credited, especially on CPUs that support instructions like RDRAND. In other words, assuming RDRAND outputs all zeros, an attacker would *still* have to accurately model every single other entropy source also in use. - The RNG now reseeds itself quite rapidly during boot, starting at 2 seconds, then 4, then 8, then 16, and so forth, so that other sources of entropy get used without much delay. - Paranoid users can set random.trust_{cpu,bootloader}=no in the kernel command line, and paranoid system builders can set the Kconfig options to N, so there's no reduction or restriction of optionality. - It's a practical default. - All the distros have it set this way. Microsoft and Apple trust it too. Bandwagon. Cons: - RDRAND *could* still be backdoored with something like a fixed key or limited space serial number seed or another indexable scheme like that. (However, it's hard to imagine threat models where the CPU is backdoored like this, yet people are still okay making *any* computations with it or connecting it to networks, etc.) - RDRAND *could* be defective, rather than backdoored, and produce garbage that is in one way or another insufficient for crypto. - Suggesting a *reduction* in paranoia, as this commit effectively does, may cause some to question my personal integrity as a "security person". - Bootloader seeds and RDRAND are generally very difficult if not all together impossible to audit. Keep in mind that this doesn't actually change any behavior. This is just a change in the default Kconfig value. The distros already are shipping kernels that set things this way. Ard made an additional argument in [1]: We're at the mercy of firmware and micro-architecture anyway, given that we are also relying on it to ensure that every instruction in the kernel's executable image has been faithfully copied to memory, and that the CPU implements those instructions as documented. So I don't think firmware or ISA bugs related to RNGs deserve special treatment - if they are broken, we should quirk around them like we usually do. So enabling these by default is a step in the right direction IMHO. In [2], Phil pointed out that having this disabled masked a bug that CI otherwise would have caught: A clean 5.15.45 boots cleanly, whereas a downstream kernel shows the static key warning (but it does go on to boot). The significant difference is that our defconfigs set CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER=y defining that on top of multi_v7_defconfig demonstrates the issue on a clean 5.15.45. Conversely, not setting that option in a downstream kernel build avoids the warning [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMj1kXGi+ieviFjXv9zQBSaGyyzeGW_VpMpTLJK8PJb2QHEQ-w@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c47c42e3-1d56-5859-a6ad-976a1a3381c6@raspberrypi.com/ Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
2022-06-05 18:30:46 +02:00