kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-10-14 05:55:17 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/drivers/opp/cpu.c

239 lines
6.1 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

PM / OPP: Move cpufreq specific OPP functions out of generic OPP library CPUFreq specific helper functions for OPP (Operating Performance Points) now use generic OPP functions that allow CPUFreq to be be moved back into CPUFreq framework. This allows for independent modifications or future enhancements as needed isolated to just CPUFreq framework alone. Here, we just move relevant code and documentation to make this part of CPUFreq infrastructure. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-05 08:33:50 -05:00
PM / OPP: Move opp core to its own directory OPP code is expanding and is already present in multiple directories (cpufreq and power). Lets move it to its own directory, to manage it better. This also moves/renames the cpufreq_opp file to cpu.c, as it will contain helpers for cpu device. Its not just about cpufreq, other frameworks can use OPPs as well. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-04 13:47:25 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpufreq specific OPP functions out of generic OPP library CPUFreq specific helper functions for OPP (Operating Performance Points) now use generic OPP functions that allow CPUFreq to be be moved back into CPUFreq framework. This allows for independent modifications or future enhancements as needed isolated to just CPUFreq framework alone. Here, we just move relevant code and documentation to make this part of CPUFreq infrastructure. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-05 08:33:50 -05:00
PM / OPP: Improve print messages with pr_fmt To identify OPP core's print messages easily, prefix them with KBUILD_MODNAME. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-17 09:45:18 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpu specific code to opp/cpu.c Move cpu device specific code out of generic opp library, and add it to cpu.c. Along with that, create a core-internal opp.h header, which will be used to share structures and function prototypes within opp core. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-04 13:47:26 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpufreq specific OPP functions out of generic OPP library CPUFreq specific helper functions for OPP (Operating Performance Points) now use generic OPP functions that allow CPUFreq to be be moved back into CPUFreq framework. This allows for independent modifications or future enhancements as needed isolated to just CPUFreq framework alone. Here, we just move relevant code and documentation to make this part of CPUFreq infrastructure. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-05 08:33:50 -05:00
PM / OPP: Move cpu specific code to opp/cpu.c Move cpu device specific code out of generic opp library, and add it to cpu.c. Along with that, create a core-internal opp.h header, which will be used to share structures and function prototypes within opp core. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-04 13:47:26 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move opp core to its own directory OPP code is expanding and is already present in multiple directories (cpufreq and power). Lets move it to its own directory, to manage it better. This also moves/renames the cpufreq_opp file to cpu.c, as it will contain helpers for cpu device. Its not just about cpufreq, other frameworks can use OPPs as well. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-04 13:47:25 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpu specific code to opp/cpu.c Move cpu device specific code out of generic opp library, and add it to cpu.c. Along with that, create a core-internal opp.h header, which will be used to share structures and function prototypes within opp core. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-04 13:47:26 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpufreq specific OPP functions out of generic OPP library CPUFreq specific helper functions for OPP (Operating Performance Points) now use generic OPP functions that allow CPUFreq to be be moved back into CPUFreq framework. This allows for independent modifications or future enhancements as needed isolated to just CPUFreq framework alone. Here, we just move relevant code and documentation to make this part of CPUFreq infrastructure. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-05 08:33:50 -05:00
PM / OPP: Rename structures for clarity Stephen pointed out recently, that few structures always confuse him as they aren't named properly. And this patch tries to address that: Names are updated as: - device_opp or dev_opp -> opp_table - dev_opp_list -> opp_tables - dev_opp_list_lock -> opp_table_lock - device_list_opp -> opp_device (it was never a list, but a structure) - list_dev -> opp_dev - And similar changes in comments and function names as well. This also fixes checkpatch warnings that were generated with this patch. No functional changes. Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-02-16 14:17:53 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpufreq specific OPP functions out of generic OPP library CPUFreq specific helper functions for OPP (Operating Performance Points) now use generic OPP functions that allow CPUFreq to be be moved back into CPUFreq framework. This allows for independent modifications or future enhancements as needed isolated to just CPUFreq framework alone. Here, we just move relevant code and documentation to make this part of CPUFreq infrastructure. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-05 08:33:50 -05:00
PM / OPP: Update OPP users to put reference This patch updates dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to get a reference to the OPPs returned by them. Also updates the users of dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to call dev_pm_opp_put() after they are done using the OPPs. As it is guaranteed the that OPPs wouldn't get freed while being used, the RCU read side locking present with the users isn't required anymore. Drop it as well. This patch also updates all users of devfreq_recommended_opp() which was returning an OPP received from the OPP core. Note that some of the OPP core routines have gained rcu_read_{lock|unlock}() calls, as those still use RCU specific APIs within them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> [Devfreq] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:47 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpufreq specific OPP functions out of generic OPP library CPUFreq specific helper functions for OPP (Operating Performance Points) now use generic OPP functions that allow CPUFreq to be be moved back into CPUFreq framework. This allows for independent modifications or future enhancements as needed isolated to just CPUFreq framework alone. Here, we just move relevant code and documentation to make this part of CPUFreq infrastructure. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-05 08:33:50 -05:00
opp: cpu: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table After checking all possible call chains to dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table() here, my tool finds that this function is never called in atomic context, namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock. And dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table() calls dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(), which calls mutex_lock that can sleep. It indicates that atmtcp_v_send() can call functions which may sleep. Thus GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, and it can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL. This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-01-26 16:48:49 +08:00
PM / OPP: Update OPP users to put reference This patch updates dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to get a reference to the OPPs returned by them. Also updates the users of dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to call dev_pm_opp_put() after they are done using the OPPs. As it is guaranteed the that OPPs wouldn't get freed while being used, the RCU read side locking present with the users isn't required anymore. Drop it as well. This patch also updates all users of devfreq_recommended_opp() which was returning an OPP received from the OPP core. Note that some of the OPP core routines have gained rcu_read_{lock|unlock}() calls, as those still use RCU specific APIs within them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> [Devfreq] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:47 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpufreq specific OPP functions out of generic OPP library CPUFreq specific helper functions for OPP (Operating Performance Points) now use generic OPP functions that allow CPUFreq to be be moved back into CPUFreq framework. This allows for independent modifications or future enhancements as needed isolated to just CPUFreq framework alone. Here, we just move relevant code and documentation to make this part of CPUFreq infrastructure. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-05 08:33:50 -05:00
cpufreq: Update boost flag while initializing freq table from OPPs cpufreq table entries for OPPs with turbo modes enabled, should be marked with CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ flag. This ensures that these states are only used while operating in boost or turbo mode. Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-29 16:23:08 +05:30
PM / OPP: Update OPP users to put reference This patch updates dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to get a reference to the OPPs returned by them. Also updates the users of dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to call dev_pm_opp_put() after they are done using the OPPs. As it is guaranteed the that OPPs wouldn't get freed while being used, the RCU read side locking present with the users isn't required anymore. Drop it as well. This patch also updates all users of devfreq_recommended_opp() which was returning an OPP received from the OPP core. Note that some of the OPP core routines have gained rcu_read_{lock|unlock}() calls, as those still use RCU specific APIs within them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> [Devfreq] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:47 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpufreq specific OPP functions out of generic OPP library CPUFreq specific helper functions for OPP (Operating Performance Points) now use generic OPP functions that allow CPUFreq to be be moved back into CPUFreq framework. This allows for independent modifications or future enhancements as needed isolated to just CPUFreq framework alone. Here, we just move relevant code and documentation to make this part of CPUFreq infrastructure. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-05 08:33:50 -05:00
PM / OPP: Move opp core to its own directory OPP code is expanding and is already present in multiple directories (cpufreq and power). Lets move it to its own directory, to manage it better. This also moves/renames the cpufreq_opp file to cpu.c, as it will contain helpers for cpu device. Its not just about cpufreq, other frameworks can use OPPs as well. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-04 13:47:25 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpu specific code to opp/cpu.c Move cpu device specific code out of generic opp library, and add it to cpu.c. Along with that, create a core-internal opp.h header, which will be used to share structures and function prototypes within opp core. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-04 13:47:26 +05:30
OPP: Don't remove dynamic OPPs from _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() Only one platform was depending on this feature and it is already updated now. Stop removing dynamic OPPs from _dev_pm_opp_remove_table(). This simplifies lot of paths and removes unnecessary parameters. Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-09-13 13:14:36 +05:30
OPP: Don't try to remove all OPP tables on failure dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() creates the OPP table for all CPUs present in the cpumask and on errors it should revert all changes it has done. It actually is doing a bit more than that. On errors, it tries to free all the OPP tables, even the one it hasn't created yet. This may also end up freeing the OPP tables which were created from separate path, like dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(). Reported-and-tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-09-13 13:09:27 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpu specific code to opp/cpu.c Move cpu device specific code out of generic opp library, and add it to cpu.c. Along with that, create a core-internal opp.h header, which will be used to share structures and function prototypes within opp core. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-04 13:47:26 +05:30
OPP: Don't try to remove all OPP tables on failure dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() creates the OPP table for all CPUs present in the cpumask and on errors it should revert all changes it has done. It actually is doing a bit more than that. On errors, it tries to free all the OPP tables, even the one it hasn't created yet. This may also end up freeing the OPP tables which were created from separate path, like dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(). Reported-and-tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-09-13 13:09:27 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpu specific code to opp/cpu.c Move cpu device specific code out of generic opp library, and add it to cpu.c. Along with that, create a core-internal opp.h header, which will be used to share structures and function prototypes within opp core. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-04 13:47:26 +05:30
OPP: Don't remove dynamic OPPs from _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() Only one platform was depending on this feature and it is already updated now. Stop removing dynamic OPPs from _dev_pm_opp_remove_table(). This simplifies lot of paths and removes unnecessary parameters. Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-09-13 13:14:36 +05:30
PM / OPP: Move cpu specific code to opp/cpu.c Move cpu device specific code out of generic opp library, and add it to cpu.c. Along with that, create a core-internal opp.h header, which will be used to share structures and function prototypes within opp core. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-04 13:47:26 +05:30
PM / OPP: add non-OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_, }remove_table Functions dev_pm_opp_of_{cpumask_,}remove_table removes/frees all the static OPP entries associated with the device and/or all cpus(in case of cpumask) that are created from DT. However the OPP entries are populated reading from the firmware or some different method using dev_pm_opp_add are marked dynamic and can't be removed using above functions. This patch adds non DT/OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table to support the above mentioned usecase. This is in preparation to make use of the same in scpi-cpufreq.c Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-03 15:05:04 +01:00
OPP: Don't remove dynamic OPPs from _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() Only one platform was depending on this feature and it is already updated now. Stop removing dynamic OPPs from _dev_pm_opp_remove_table(). This simplifies lot of paths and removes unnecessary parameters. Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-09-13 13:14:36 +05:30
PM / OPP: add non-OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_, }remove_table Functions dev_pm_opp_of_{cpumask_,}remove_table removes/frees all the static OPP entries associated with the device and/or all cpus(in case of cpumask) that are created from DT. However the OPP entries are populated reading from the firmware or some different method using dev_pm_opp_add are marked dynamic and can't be removed using above functions. This patch adds non DT/OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table to support the above mentioned usecase. This is in preparation to make use of the same in scpi-cpufreq.c Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-03 15:05:04 +01:00
PM / OPP: Relocate dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() Move dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() towards the end of the file. This is required for better readability after the next patch is applied, which adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-21 14:28:56 +05:30
PM / OPP: Mark cpumask as const in dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() isn't supposed to update the cpumask passed as its parameter, and so it should always have been marked 'const'. Do it now. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-27 08:52:22 +05:30
PM / OPP: pass cpumask by reference The new use of dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus resulted in a harmless compiler warning with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y: drivers/cpufreq/mvebu-cpufreq.c: In function 'armada_xp_pmsu_cpufreq_init': include/linux/cpumask.h:550:25: error: passing argument 2 of 'dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers] The problem here is that cpumask_var_t gets passed by reference, but by declaring a 'const cpumask_var_t' argument, only the pointer is constant, not the actual mask. This is harmless because the function does not actually modify the mask. This patch changes the function prototypes for all of the related functions to pass a 'struct cpumask *' instead of 'cpumask_var_t', matching what most other such functions do in the kernel. This lets us mark all the other similar functions as taking a 'const' mask where possible, and it avoids the warning without any change in object code. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 947bd567f7a5 (mvebu: Use dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() to mark OPP tables as shared) Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-30 13:33:29 +02:00
PM / OPP: Relocate dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() Move dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() towards the end of the file. This is required for better readability after the next patch is applied, which adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-21 14:28:56 +05:30
PM / OPP: Take kref from _find_opp_table() Take reference of the OPP table from within _find_opp_table(). Also update the callers of _find_opp_table() to call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table() after they have used the OPP table. Note that _find_opp_table() increments the reference under the opp_table_lock. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed until the callers of _find_opp_table() call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(), there is no need to take the opp_table_lock or rcu_read_lock() around it. Drop them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:48 +05:30
PM / OPP: Relocate dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() Move dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() towards the end of the file. This is required for better readability after the next patch is applied, which adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-21 14:28:56 +05:30
PM / OPP: Mark shared-opp for non-dt case opp core allows OPPs to be explicitly marked as shared from platform code, in case of operating-point v1 bindings. Though we do everything fine in that case, we don't set the flag in the opp-table to indicate that the OPPs are shared. It works fine today as the flag isn't used anywhere else in the core, but we should be doing the right thing by marking it set. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-21 14:28:57 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add 'UNKNOWN' status for shared_opp in struct opp_table dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case when the OPP core doesn't know whether or not the table is shared. It works on the majority of platforms, where the OPP table is never created before invoking the function and then -ENODEV is returned by it. But in the case of one platform (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation is a bit different. The OPP table has been created (somehow) before dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and it returns 0. Its caller treats that as 'the CPUs don't share OPPs' and that leads to degraded performance. Fix this by converting 'shared_opp' in struct opp_table to an enum and making dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() return -EINVAL in case when the value of that field is "access unknown", so that the caller can handle it accordingly (cpufreq-dt considers that as 'all CPUs share the table', for example). Fixes: 6f707daa3833 "PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()" Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw : Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-06-16 19:03:11 +05:30
PM / OPP: Relocate dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() Move dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() towards the end of the file. This is required for better readability after the next patch is applied, which adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-21 14:28:56 +05:30
PM / OPP: Take kref from _find_opp_table() Take reference of the OPP table from within _find_opp_table(). Also update the callers of _find_opp_table() to call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table() after they have used the OPP table. Note that _find_opp_table() increments the reference under the opp_table_lock. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed until the callers of _find_opp_table() call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(), there is no need to take the opp_table_lock or rcu_read_lock() around it. Drop them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:48 +05:30
PM / OPP: Relocate dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() Move dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() towards the end of the file. This is required for better readability after the next patch is applied, which adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-21 14:28:56 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() OPP core allows a platform to mark OPP table as shared, when the platform isn't using operating-points-v2 bindings. And, so there should be a non DT way of finding out if the OPP table is shared or not. This patch adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(), which first tries to get OPP sharing information from the opp-table (in case it is already marked as shared), otherwise it uses the existing DT way of finding sharing information. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-27 08:52:23 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add 'UNKNOWN' status for shared_opp in struct opp_table dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case when the OPP core doesn't know whether or not the table is shared. It works on the majority of platforms, where the OPP table is never created before invoking the function and then -ENODEV is returned by it. But in the case of one platform (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation is a bit different. The OPP table has been created (somehow) before dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and it returns 0. Its caller treats that as 'the CPUs don't share OPPs' and that leads to degraded performance. Fix this by converting 'shared_opp' in struct opp_table to an enum and making dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() return -EINVAL in case when the value of that field is "access unknown", so that the caller can handle it accordingly (cpufreq-dt considers that as 'all CPUs share the table', for example). Fixes: 6f707daa3833 "PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()" Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw : Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-06-16 19:03:11 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() OPP core allows a platform to mark OPP table as shared, when the platform isn't using operating-points-v2 bindings. And, so there should be a non DT way of finding out if the OPP table is shared or not. This patch adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(), which first tries to get OPP sharing information from the opp-table (in case it is already marked as shared), otherwise it uses the existing DT way of finding sharing information. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-27 08:52:23 +05:30
PM / OPP: pass cpumask by reference The new use of dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus resulted in a harmless compiler warning with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y: drivers/cpufreq/mvebu-cpufreq.c: In function 'armada_xp_pmsu_cpufreq_init': include/linux/cpumask.h:550:25: error: passing argument 2 of 'dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers] The problem here is that cpumask_var_t gets passed by reference, but by declaring a 'const cpumask_var_t' argument, only the pointer is constant, not the actual mask. This is harmless because the function does not actually modify the mask. This patch changes the function prototypes for all of the related functions to pass a 'struct cpumask *' instead of 'cpumask_var_t', matching what most other such functions do in the kernel. This lets us mark all the other similar functions as taking a 'const' mask where possible, and it avoids the warning without any change in object code. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 947bd567f7a5 (mvebu: Use dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() to mark OPP tables as shared) Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-30 13:33:29 +02:00
PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() OPP core allows a platform to mark OPP table as shared, when the platform isn't using operating-points-v2 bindings. And, so there should be a non DT way of finding out if the OPP table is shared or not. This patch adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(), which first tries to get OPP sharing information from the opp-table (in case it is already marked as shared), otherwise it uses the existing DT way of finding sharing information. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-27 08:52:23 +05:30
PM / OPP: Take kref from _find_opp_table() Take reference of the OPP table from within _find_opp_table(). Also update the callers of _find_opp_table() to call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table() after they have used the OPP table. Note that _find_opp_table() increments the reference under the opp_table_lock. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed until the callers of _find_opp_table() call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(), there is no need to take the opp_table_lock or rcu_read_lock() around it. Drop them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:48 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() OPP core allows a platform to mark OPP table as shared, when the platform isn't using operating-points-v2 bindings. And, so there should be a non DT way of finding out if the OPP table is shared or not. This patch adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(), which first tries to get OPP sharing information from the opp-table (in case it is already marked as shared), otherwise it uses the existing DT way of finding sharing information. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-27 08:52:23 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add 'UNKNOWN' status for shared_opp in struct opp_table dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case when the OPP core doesn't know whether or not the table is shared. It works on the majority of platforms, where the OPP table is never created before invoking the function and then -ENODEV is returned by it. But in the case of one platform (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation is a bit different. The OPP table has been created (somehow) before dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and it returns 0. Its caller treats that as 'the CPUs don't share OPPs' and that leads to degraded performance. Fix this by converting 'shared_opp' in struct opp_table to an enum and making dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() return -EINVAL in case when the value of that field is "access unknown", so that the caller can handle it accordingly (cpufreq-dt considers that as 'all CPUs share the table', for example). Fixes: 6f707daa3833 "PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()" Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw : Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-06-16 19:03:11 +05:30
PM / OPP: Take kref from _find_opp_table() Take reference of the OPP table from within _find_opp_table(). Also update the callers of _find_opp_table() to call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table() after they have used the OPP table. Note that _find_opp_table() increments the reference under the opp_table_lock. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed until the callers of _find_opp_table() call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(), there is no need to take the opp_table_lock or rcu_read_lock() around it. Drop them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:48 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add 'UNKNOWN' status for shared_opp in struct opp_table dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case when the OPP core doesn't know whether or not the table is shared. It works on the majority of platforms, where the OPP table is never created before invoking the function and then -ENODEV is returned by it. But in the case of one platform (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation is a bit different. The OPP table has been created (somehow) before dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and it returns 0. Its caller treats that as 'the CPUs don't share OPPs' and that leads to degraded performance. Fix this by converting 'shared_opp' in struct opp_table to an enum and making dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() return -EINVAL in case when the value of that field is "access unknown", so that the caller can handle it accordingly (cpufreq-dt considers that as 'all CPUs share the table', for example). Fixes: 6f707daa3833 "PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()" Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw : Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-06-16 19:03:11 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() OPP core allows a platform to mark OPP table as shared, when the platform isn't using operating-points-v2 bindings. And, so there should be a non DT way of finding out if the OPP table is shared or not. This patch adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(), which first tries to get OPP sharing information from the opp-table (in case it is already marked as shared), otherwise it uses the existing DT way of finding sharing information. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-27 08:52:23 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add 'UNKNOWN' status for shared_opp in struct opp_table dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case when the OPP core doesn't know whether or not the table is shared. It works on the majority of platforms, where the OPP table is never created before invoking the function and then -ENODEV is returned by it. But in the case of one platform (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation is a bit different. The OPP table has been created (somehow) before dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and it returns 0. Its caller treats that as 'the CPUs don't share OPPs' and that leads to degraded performance. Fix this by converting 'shared_opp' in struct opp_table to an enum and making dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() return -EINVAL in case when the value of that field is "access unknown", so that the caller can handle it accordingly (cpufreq-dt considers that as 'all CPUs share the table', for example). Fixes: 6f707daa3833 "PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()" Reported-and-tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw : Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-06-16 19:03:11 +05:30
OPP: Protect dev_list with opp_table lock The dev_list needs to be protected with a lock, else we may have simultaneous access (addition/removal) to it and that would be racy. Extend scope of the opp_table lock to protect dev_list as well. Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-08-03 07:05:21 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() OPP core allows a platform to mark OPP table as shared, when the platform isn't using operating-points-v2 bindings. And, so there should be a non DT way of finding out if the OPP table is shared or not. This patch adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(), which first tries to get OPP sharing information from the opp-table (in case it is already marked as shared), otherwise it uses the existing DT way of finding sharing information. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-27 08:52:23 +05:30
OPP: Protect dev_list with opp_table lock The dev_list needs to be protected with a lock, else we may have simultaneous access (addition/removal) to it and that would be racy. Extend scope of the opp_table lock to protect dev_list as well. Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-08-03 07:05:21 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() OPP core allows a platform to mark OPP table as shared, when the platform isn't using operating-points-v2 bindings. And, so there should be a non DT way of finding out if the OPP table is shared or not. This patch adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(), which first tries to get OPP sharing information from the opp-table (in case it is already marked as shared), otherwise it uses the existing DT way of finding sharing information. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-27 08:52:23 +05:30
PM / OPP: Take kref from _find_opp_table() Take reference of the OPP table from within _find_opp_table(). Also update the callers of _find_opp_table() to call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table() after they have used the OPP table. Note that _find_opp_table() increments the reference under the opp_table_lock. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed until the callers of _find_opp_table() call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(), there is no need to take the opp_table_lock or rcu_read_lock() around it. Drop them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-01-23 10:11:48 +05:30
PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() OPP core allows a platform to mark OPP table as shared, when the platform isn't using operating-points-v2 bindings. And, so there should be a non DT way of finding out if the OPP table is shared or not. This patch adds dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus(), which first tries to get OPP sharing information from the opp-table (in case it is already marked as shared), otherwise it uses the existing DT way of finding sharing information. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-27 08:52:23 +05:30