kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-10-14 05:55:17 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/include/linux/property.h

341 lines
11 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500 Based on 2 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation # extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-06-04 10:11:33 +02:00
Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware Add a uniform interface by which device drivers can request device properties from the platform firmware by providing a property name and the corresponding data type. The purpose of it is to help to write portable code that won't depend on any particular platform firmware interface. The following general helper functions are added: device_property_present() device_property_read_u8() device_property_read_u16() device_property_read_u32() device_property_read_u64() device_property_read_string() device_property_read_u8_array() device_property_read_u16_array() device_property_read_u32_array() device_property_read_u64_array() device_property_read_string_array() The first one allows the caller to check if the given property is present. The next 5 of them allow single-valued properties of various types to be retrieved in a uniform way. The remaining 5 are for reading properties with multiple values (arrays of either numbers or strings). The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. This change set includes material from Mika Westerberg and Aaron Lu. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 01:28:56 +01:00
device property: Add fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() is intended for obtaining local endpoints by a given local port. fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() is slightly different from its OF counterpart, of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(): instead of using -1 as a value to indicate that a port or an endpoint number does not matter, it uses flags to look for equal or greater endpoint. The port number is always fixed. It also returns only remote endpoints that belong to an available device, a behaviour that can be turned off with a flag. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-04-02 13:30:37 +03:00
driver core / ACPI: Represent ACPI companions using fwnode_handle Now that we have struct fwnode_handle, we can use that to point to ACPI companions from struct device objects instead of pointing to struct acpi_device directly. There are two benefits from that. First, the somewhat ugly and hackish struct acpi_dev_node can be dropped and, second, the same struct fwnode_handle pointer can be used in the future to point to other (non-ACPI) firmware device node types. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
2015-03-16 23:49:03 +01:00
Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware Add a uniform interface by which device drivers can request device properties from the platform firmware by providing a property name and the corresponding data type. The purpose of it is to help to write portable code that won't depend on any particular platform firmware interface. The following general helper functions are added: device_property_present() device_property_read_u8() device_property_read_u16() device_property_read_u32() device_property_read_u64() device_property_read_string() device_property_read_u8_array() device_property_read_u16_array() device_property_read_u32_array() device_property_read_u64_array() device_property_read_string_array() The first one allows the caller to check if the given property is present. The next 5 of them allow single-valued properties of various types to be retrieved in a uniform way. The remaining 5 are for reading properties with multiple values (arrays of either numbers or strings). The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. This change set includes material from Mika Westerberg and Aaron Lu. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 01:28:56 +01:00
device property: Introducing enum dev_dma_attr A device could have one of the following DMA attributes: * DMA not supported * DMA non-coherent * DMA coherent So, this patch introduces enum dev_dma_attribute. This will be used by new APIs introduced in later patches. Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-28 15:50:47 -07:00
device property: Make dev_fwnode() public The function to obtain a fwnode related to a struct device is useful for drivers that use the fwnode property API: it allows not being aware of the underlying firmware implementation. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-03-28 10:52:24 +03:00
Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware Add a uniform interface by which device drivers can request device properties from the platform firmware by providing a property name and the corresponding data type. The purpose of it is to help to write portable code that won't depend on any particular platform firmware interface. The following general helper functions are added: device_property_present() device_property_read_u8() device_property_read_u16() device_property_read_u32() device_property_read_u64() device_property_read_string() device_property_read_u8_array() device_property_read_u16_array() device_property_read_u32_array() device_property_read_u64_array() device_property_read_string_array() The first one allows the caller to check if the given property is present. The next 5 of them allow single-valued properties of various types to be retrieved in a uniform way. The remaining 5 are for reading properties with multiple values (arrays of either numbers or strings). The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. This change set includes material from Mika Westerberg and Aaron Lu. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 01:28:56 +01:00
device property: Add fwnode_property_match_string() Sometimes it is useful to be able to extract an index of certain string value from an array of strings. A typical use case is to give a name to a DMA channel, PWM, clock and so on. Provide an implementation using unified device property accessors that follows of_property_match_string() but works for all supported fwnodes. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-14 17:37:35 +03:00
Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware Add a uniform interface by which device drivers can request device properties from the platform firmware by providing a property name and the corresponding data type. The purpose of it is to help to write portable code that won't depend on any particular platform firmware interface. The following general helper functions are added: device_property_present() device_property_read_u8() device_property_read_u16() device_property_read_u32() device_property_read_u64() device_property_read_string() device_property_read_u8_array() device_property_read_u16_array() device_property_read_u32_array() device_property_read_u64_array() device_property_read_string_array() The first one allows the caller to check if the given property is present. The next 5 of them allow single-valued properties of various types to be retrieved in a uniform way. The remaining 5 are for reading properties with multiple values (arrays of either numbers or strings). The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. This change set includes material from Mika Westerberg and Aaron Lu. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 01:28:56 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
device property: Add fwnode_property_match_string() Sometimes it is useful to be able to extract an index of certain string value from an array of strings. A typical use case is to give a name to a DMA channel, PWM, clock and so on. Provide an implementation using unified device property accessors that follows of_property_match_string() but works for all supported fwnodes. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-14 17:37:35 +03:00
device property: Introduce fwnode_property_get_reference_args The new fwnode_property_get_reference_args() interface amends the fwnode property API with the functionality of both of_parse_phandle_with_args() and __acpi_node_get_property_reference(). The semantics is slightly different: the cells property is ignored on ACPI as the number of arguments can be explicitly obtained from the firmware interface. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 15:11:49 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
device property: Allow iterating over available child fwnodes Implement a new helper function fwnode_get_next_available_child_node(), which enables obtaining next enabled child fwnode, which works on a similar basis to OF's of_get_next_available_child(). This commit also introduces a macro, thanks to which it is possible to iterate over the available fwnodes, using the new function described above. Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-01-18 13:31:41 +01:00
ACPI / property: Add fwnode_get_next_child_node() The ACPI _DSD hierarchical data extension makes it possible to have hierarchies deeper than one level in similar way than DT allows. These "subsubnodes" have not been accessible because device property implementation only provides device_get_next_child_node() that is limited to direct descendants of a device. We need this ability in order support things like remote endpoints currently supported in DT with of_graph_* APIs. Modify acpi_get_next_subnode() to accept fwnode handle instead and update callers accordingly. Also add a new function fwnode_get_next_child_node() that works directly with fwnodes and modify device_get_next_child_node() to call it directly. While there add a macro fwnode_for_each_child_node() analogous to the current device_for_each_child_node() but it works with fwnodes instead of devices. Link: http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-hierarchical-data-extension-UUID-v1.pdf Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-03-28 10:52:18 +03:00
device property: Add fwnode_get_parent() Now that ACPI has support for returning parent firmware node for both types of nodes we can expose this to others as well. This adds a new function fwnode_get_parent() that can be used for DT and ACPI nodes to retrieve the parent firmware node. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-03-28 10:52:17 +03:00
device property: Allow iterating over available child fwnodes Implement a new helper function fwnode_get_next_available_child_node(), which enables obtaining next enabled child fwnode, which works on a similar basis to OF's of_get_next_available_child(). This commit also introduces a macro, thanks to which it is possible to iterate over the available fwnodes, using the new function described above. Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-01-18 13:31:41 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: improve readability of macros There is no functional change. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:34 +02:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
device property: Add function to search for named child of device For device nodes in both DT and ACPI, it possible to have named child nodes which contain properties (an existing example being gpio-leds). This adds a function to find a named child node for a device which can be used by drivers for property retrieval. For DT data node name matching, of_node_cmp() and similar functions are made available outside of CONFIG_OF block so the new function can reference these for DT and non-DT builds. For ACPI data node name matching, a helper function is also added which returns false if CONFIG_ACPI is not set, otherwise it performs a string comparison on the data node name. This avoids using the acpi_data_node struct for non CONFIG_ACPI builds, which would otherwise cause a build failure. Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com> Acked-by: Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@intel.com> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2016-06-21 18:50:20 +01:00
device property: Make fwnode_handle_get() return the fwnode The fwnode_handle_get() function is used to obtain a reference to an fwnode. A common usage pattern for the OF equivalent of the function is: mynode = of_node_get(node); Similarly make fwnode_handle_get() return the fwnode to which the reference was obtained. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-09-19 12:39:11 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Introduce fwnode_irq_get() Until now there were two very similar functions allowing to get Linux IRQ number from ACPI handle (acpi_irq_get()) and OF node (of_irq_get()). The first one appeared to be used only as a subroutine of platform_irq_get(), which (in the generic code) limited IRQ obtaining from _CRS method only to nodes associated to kernel's struct platform_device. This patch introduces a new helper routine - fwnode_irq_get(), which allows to get the IRQ number directly from the fwnode to be used as common for OF/ACPI worlds. It is usable not only for the parents fwnodes, but also for the child nodes comprising their own _CRS methods with interrupts description. In order to be able o satisfy compilation with !CONFIG_ACPI and also simplify the new code, introduce a helper macro (ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE), with which it is possible to reach an ACPI handle directly from its fwnode. Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-01-18 13:31:40 +01:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware Add a uniform interface by which device drivers can request device properties from the platform firmware by providing a property name and the corresponding data type. The purpose of it is to help to write portable code that won't depend on any particular platform firmware interface. The following general helper functions are added: device_property_present() device_property_read_u8() device_property_read_u16() device_property_read_u32() device_property_read_u64() device_property_read_string() device_property_read_u8_array() device_property_read_u16_array() device_property_read_u32_array() device_property_read_u64_array() device_property_read_string_array() The first one allows the caller to check if the given property is present. The next 5 of them allow single-valued properties of various types to be retrieved in a uniform way. The remaining 5 are for reading properties with multiple values (arrays of either numbers or strings). The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. This change set includes material from Mika Westerberg and Aaron Lu. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 01:28:56 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node properties Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 14:03:59 +01:00
device property: Introduce firmware node type for platform data Introduce data structures and code allowing "built-in" properties to be associated with devices in such a way that they will be used by the device_property_* API if no proper firmware node (neither DT nor ACPI) is present for the given device. Each property is to be represented by a property_entry structure. An array of property_entry structures (terminated with a null entry) can be pointed to by the properties field of struct property_set that can be added as a firmware node to a struct device using device_add_property_set(). That will cause the device_property_* API to use that property_set as the source of properties if the given device does not have a DT node or an ACPI companion device object associated with it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-04-03 16:05:11 +02:00
device property: refactor built-in properties support Instead of using the type and nval fields we will use length (in bytes) of the value. The sanity check is done in the accessors. The built-in property accessors are split in the same way such as device tree. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:31 +02:00
device property: keep single value inplace We may save a lot of lines of code and space by keeping single values inside the struct property_entry. Refactor the implementation to do so. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:32 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: keep single value inplace We may save a lot of lines of code and space by keeping single values inside the struct property_entry. Refactor the implementation to do so. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:32 +02:00
device property: Introduce firmware node type for platform data Introduce data structures and code allowing "built-in" properties to be associated with devices in such a way that they will be used by the device_property_* API if no proper firmware node (neither DT nor ACPI) is present for the given device. Each property is to be represented by a property_entry structure. An array of property_entry structures (terminated with a null entry) can be pointed to by the properties field of struct property_set that can be added as a firmware node to a struct device using device_add_property_set(). That will cause the device_property_* API to use that property_set as the source of properties if the given device does not have a DT node or an ACPI companion device object associated with it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-04-03 16:05:11 +02:00
device property: refactor built-in properties support Instead of using the type and nval fields we will use length (in bytes) of the value. The sanity check is done in the accessors. The built-in property accessors are split in the same way such as device tree. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:31 +02:00
device property: keep single value inplace We may save a lot of lines of code and space by keeping single values inside the struct property_entry. Refactor the implementation to do so. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:32 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: Introduce firmware node type for platform data Introduce data structures and code allowing "built-in" properties to be associated with devices in such a way that they will be used by the device_property_* API if no proper firmware node (neither DT nor ACPI) is present for the given device. Each property is to be represented by a property_entry structure. An array of property_entry structures (terminated with a null entry) can be pointed to by the properties field of struct property_set that can be added as a firmware node to a struct device using device_add_property_set(). That will cause the device_property_* API to use that property_set as the source of properties if the given device does not have a DT node or an ACPI companion device object associated with it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-04-03 16:05:11 +02:00
device property: keep single value inplace We may save a lot of lines of code and space by keeping single values inside the struct property_entry. Refactor the implementation to do so. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:32 +02:00
device property: constify property arrays values Data that is fed into property arrays should not be modified, so let's mark relevant pointers as const. This will allow us making source arrays as const/__initconst. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-02-02 17:41:26 -08:00
device property: keep single value inplace We may save a lot of lines of code and space by keeping single values inside the struct property_entry. Refactor the implementation to do so. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:32 +02:00
device property: Introduce firmware node type for platform data Introduce data structures and code allowing "built-in" properties to be associated with devices in such a way that they will be used by the device_property_* API if no proper firmware node (neither DT nor ACPI) is present for the given device. Each property is to be represented by a property_entry structure. An array of property_entry structures (terminated with a null entry) can be pointed to by the properties field of struct property_set that can be added as a firmware node to a struct device using device_add_property_set(). That will cause the device_property_* API to use that property_set as the source of properties if the given device does not have a DT node or an ACPI companion device object associated with it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-04-03 16:05:11 +02:00
include/linux/property.h: fix build issues with gcc-4.4.4 gcc-4.4.4 has problems with initialization of anonymous unions: drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c:30: error: unknown field 'value' specified in initializer work around this by crafting the initializers in a manner which the compiler can handle. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-01-01 02:07:09 +01:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Define type of PROPERTY_ENRTY_*() macros Some of the drivers may use the macro at runtime flow, like struct property_entry p[10]; ... p[index++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8("u8 property", u8_data); In that case and absence of the data type compiler fails the build: drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_dmi.c:79:29: error: Expected ; at end of statement drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_dmi.c:79:29: error: got { Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-01-22 18:01:42 +02:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
include/linux/property.h: fix build issues with gcc-4.4.4 gcc-4.4.4 has problems with initialization of anonymous unions: drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c:30: error: unknown field 'value' specified in initializer work around this by crafting the initializers in a manner which the compiler can handle. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-01-01 02:07:09 +01:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Define type of PROPERTY_ENRTY_*() macros Some of the drivers may use the macro at runtime flow, like struct property_entry p[10]; ... p[index++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8("u8 property", u8_data); In that case and absence of the data type compiler fails the build: drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_dmi.c:79:29: error: Expected ; at end of statement drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_dmi.c:79:29: error: got { Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-01-22 18:01:42 +02:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Fix the length used in PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING() With string type property entries we need to use sizeof(const char *) instead of the number of characters as the length of the entry. If the string was shorter then sizeof(const char *), attempts to read it would have failed with -EOVERFLOW. The problem has been hidden because all build-in string properties have had a string longer then 8 characters until now. Fixes: a85f42047533 ("device property: helper macros for property entry creation") Cc: 4.5+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.5+ Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-01-23 17:44:16 +03:00
device property: Get rid of union aliasing Commit 318a19718261 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/ Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-05-15 20:32:02 +03:00
device property: add spaces to PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING macro Just a style fix, no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-12-29 13:07:48 +02:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: Define type of PROPERTY_ENRTY_*() macros Some of the drivers may use the macro at runtime flow, like struct property_entry p[10]; ... p[index++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8("u8 property", u8_data); In that case and absence of the data type compiler fails the build: drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_dmi.c:79:29: error: Expected ; at end of statement drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_dmi.c:79:29: error: got { Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-01-22 18:01:42 +02:00
device property: helper macros for property entry creation Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-30 17:11:33 +02:00
device property: export code duplicating array of property entries When augmenting ACPI-enumerated devices with additional property data based on DMI info, a module has often several potential property sets, with only one being active on a given box. In order to save memory it should be possible to mark everything and __initdata or __initconst, execute DMI match early, and duplicate relevant properties. Then kernel will discard the rest of them. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-02-02 17:41:27 -08:00
device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The function can just create the instance of it on its own and bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot. This renames device_add_property_set() to device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct property_entry as its parameter instead of struct property_set. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-03-29 14:52:23 +03:00
device property: allow to constify properties There is no reason why statically defined properties should be modifiable, so let's make device_add_properties() and the rest of pset_*() functions to take const pointers to properties. This will allow us to mark properties as const/__initconst at definition sites. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-02-02 17:41:25 -08:00
device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_set Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The function can just create the instance of it on its own and bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot. This renames device_add_property_set() to device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct property_entry as its parameter instead of struct property_set. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-03-29 14:52:23 +03:00
device property: Introduce firmware node type for platform data Introduce data structures and code allowing "built-in" properties to be associated with devices in such a way that they will be used by the device_property_* API if no proper firmware node (neither DT nor ACPI) is present for the given device. Each property is to be represented by a property_entry structure. An array of property_entry structures (terminated with a null entry) can be pointed to by the properties field of struct property_set that can be added as a firmware node to a struct device using device_add_property_set(). That will cause the device_property_* API to use that property_set as the source of properties if the given device does not have a DT node or an ACPI companion device object associated with it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-04-03 16:05:11 +02:00
device property: Adding DMA Attribute APIs for Generic Devices The function device_dma_is_coherent() does not sufficiently communicate device DMA attributes. Instead, this patch introduces device_get_dma_attr(), which returns enum dev_dma_attr. It replaces the acpi_check_dma(), which will be removed in subsequent patch. This also provides a convenient function, device_dma_supported(), to check DMA support of the specified device. Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-28 15:50:49 -07:00
device property: Introduce a common API to fetch device match data There is an OF/ACPI function to obtain the driver data. We want to hide OF/ACPI details from the device drivers and abstract following the device family of functions. Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
2017-12-13 02:20:49 -05:00
device property: Constify device_get_match_data() Constify device_get_match_data() as OF and ACPI variants return constant value. Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-09 17:38:36 +02:00
device property: Adding DMA Attribute APIs for Generic Devices The function device_dma_is_coherent() does not sufficiently communicate device DMA attributes. Instead, this patch introduces device_get_dma_attr(), which returns enum dev_dma_attr. It replaces the acpi_check_dma(), which will be removed in subsequent patch. This also provides a convenient function, device_dma_supported(), to check DMA support of the specified device. Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-28 15:50:49 -07:00
Add a matching set of device_ functions for determining mac/phy OF has some helper functions for parsing MAC and PHY settings. In cases where the platform is providing this information rather than the device itself, there needs to be similar functions for ACPI. These functions are slightly modified versions of the ones in of_net which can use information provided via DT or ACPI. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2015-08-12 17:06:26 -05:00
device property: Introduce fwnode_get_phy_mode() Until now there were two almost identical functions for obtaining network PHY mode - of_get_phy_mode() and, more generic, device_get_phy_mode(). However it is not uncommon, that the network interface is represented as a child of the actual controller, hence it is not associated directly to any struct device, required by the latter routine. This commit allows for getting the PHY mode for children nodes in the ACPI world by introducing a new function - fwnode_get_phy_mode(). This commit also changes device_get_phy_mode() routine to be its wrapper, in order to prevent unnecessary duplication. Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-01-18 13:31:39 +01:00
device property: Introduce fwnode_get_mac_address() Until now there were two almost identical functions for obtaining MAC address - of_get_mac_address() and, more generic, device_get_mac_address(). However it is not uncommon, that the network interface is represented as a child of the actual controller, hence it is not associated directly to any struct device, required by the latter routine. This commit allows for getting the MAC address for children nodes in the ACPI world by introducing a new function - fwnode_get_mac_address(). This commit also changes device_get_mac_address() routine to be its wrapper, in order to prevent unnecessary duplication. Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-01-18 13:31:38 +01:00
device property: Add support for remote endpoints This follows DT implementation of of_graph_* APIs but we call them fwnode_graph_* instead. For DT nodes the existing of_graph_* implementation will be used. For ACPI we use the new ACPI graph implementation instead. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-03-28 10:52:21 +03:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
device property: Add fwnode_graph_get_port_parent Provide a helper to obtain the parent device fwnode without first parsing the remote-endpoint as per fwnode_graph_get_remote_port_parent. Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-06-06 12:37:41 +03:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
device property: Add support for remote endpoints This follows DT implementation of of_graph_* APIs but we call them fwnode_graph_* instead. For DT nodes the existing of_graph_* implementation will be used. For ACPI we use the new ACPI graph implementation instead. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-03-28 10:52:21 +03:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
device property: Add support for remote endpoints This follows DT implementation of of_graph_* APIs but we call them fwnode_graph_* instead. For DT nodes the existing of_graph_* implementation will be used. For ACPI we use the new ACPI graph implementation instead. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-03-28 10:52:21 +03:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
device property: Add support for remote endpoints This follows DT implementation of of_graph_* APIs but we call them fwnode_graph_* instead. For DT nodes the existing of_graph_* implementation will be used. For ACPI we use the new ACPI graph implementation instead. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-03-28 10:52:21 +03:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
device property: Add support for remote endpoints This follows DT implementation of of_graph_* APIs but we call them fwnode_graph_* instead. For DT nodes the existing of_graph_* implementation will be used. For ACPI we use the new ACPI graph implementation instead. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-03-28 10:52:21 +03:00
device property: Add fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() is intended for obtaining local endpoints by a given local port. fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() is slightly different from its OF counterpart, of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(): instead of using -1 as a value to indicate that a port or an endpoint number does not matter, it uses flags to look for equal or greater endpoint. The port number is always fixed. It also returns only remote endpoints that belong to an available device, a behaviour that can be turned off with a flag. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-04-02 13:30:37 +03:00
device property: Add a macro for interating over graph endpoints Add a convenience macro for iterating over graph endpoints. Iterating over graph endpoints using fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() is a recurring pattern, and this macro allows calling that function in a slightly more convenient way. For instance, for (child = NULL; (child = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(fwnode, child)); ) becomes fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint(fwnode, child) Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-09-19 12:39:12 +03:00
device property: Constify fwnode property API Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-21 14:39:36 +03:00
device property: Add support for fwnode endpoints Similar to OF endpoints, endpoint type nodes can be also supported on ACPI. In order to make it possible for drivers to ignore the matter, add a type for fwnode_endpoint and a function to parse them. On ACPI, find the child node index instead of relying on the "endpoint" property. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-03-28 10:52:25 +03:00
drivers: base: Introducing software nodes to the firmware node framework Software node is a new struct fwnode_handle type that can be used to describe devices in kernel (software). It is meant to complement fwnodes representing real firmware nodes when they are incomplete (for example missing device properties) and to supply the primary fwnode when the firmware lacks hardware description for a device completely. The software node type is really meant to replace the currently used "property_set" struct fwnode_handle type. The handling of struct property_set is glued to the generic device property handling code, and it is not possible to create a struct property_set independently from the device that it is bind to. struct property_set is only created when device properties are added to already initialized struct device, and control of it is only possible from the generic property handling code. Software nodes are instead designed to be created independently from the device entries (struct device). It makes them much more flexible, as then the device meant to be bind to the node can be created at a later time, and from another location. It is also possible to bind multiple devices to a single software node if needed. The software node implementation also includes support for node hierarchy, which was the main motivation for this commit. The node hierarchy was something that was requested for the struct property_set, but it did not seem reasonable to try to extend the property_set support for that purpose. struct property_set was really meant only for device property handling like the name suggests. Support for struct property_set is not yet removed in this commit, but it will be in the following one. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-11-09 17:21:36 +03:00
Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware Add a uniform interface by which device drivers can request device properties from the platform firmware by providing a property name and the corresponding data type. The purpose of it is to help to write portable code that won't depend on any particular platform firmware interface. The following general helper functions are added: device_property_present() device_property_read_u8() device_property_read_u16() device_property_read_u32() device_property_read_u64() device_property_read_string() device_property_read_u8_array() device_property_read_u16_array() device_property_read_u32_array() device_property_read_u64_array() device_property_read_string_array() The first one allows the caller to check if the given property is present. The next 5 of them allow single-valued properties of various types to be retrieved in a uniform way. The remaining 5 are for reading properties with multiple values (arrays of either numbers or strings). The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. This change set includes material from Mika Westerberg and Aaron Lu. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-04 01:28:56 +01:00