kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-10-12 06:01:58 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/lib/test_hash.c

257 lines
6.3 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for more missed files Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which: - Have no license information of any form - Have MODULE_LICENCE("GPL*") inside which was used in the initial scan/conversion to ignore the file These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-19 13:08:20 +01:00
<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions This is just the infrastructure; there are no users yet. This is modelled on CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM; a CONFIG_ symbol declares the existence of <asm/hash.h>. That file may define its own versions of various functions, and define HAVE_* symbols (no CONFIG_ prefix!) to suppress the generic ones. Included is a self-test (in lib/test_hash.c) that verifies the basics. It is NOT in general required that the arch-specific functions compute the same thing as the generic, but if a HAVE_* symbol is defined with the value 1, then equality is tested. Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macq.eu> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Cc: Alistair Francis <alistai@xilinx.com> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
2016-05-26 22:11:51 -04:00
lib/test_hash.c: fix warning in two-dimensional array init lib/test_hash.c: In function 'test_hash_init': lib/test_hash.c:146:2: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] Fixes: 468a9428521e7d00 ("<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160829214952.1334674-3-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-09-01 16:14:50 -07:00
<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions This is just the infrastructure; there are no users yet. This is modelled on CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM; a CONFIG_ symbol declares the existence of <asm/hash.h>. That file may define its own versions of various functions, and define HAVE_* symbols (no CONFIG_ prefix!) to suppress the generic ones. Included is a self-test (in lib/test_hash.c) that verifies the basics. It is NOT in general required that the arch-specific functions compute the same thing as the generic, but if a HAVE_* symbol is defined with the value 1, then equality is tested. Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macq.eu> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Cc: Alistair Francis <alistai@xilinx.com> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
2016-05-26 22:11:51 -04:00
vfs: make the string hashes salt the hash We always mixed in the parent pointer into the dentry name hash, but we did it late at lookup time. It turns out that we can simplify that lookup-time action by salting the hash with the parent pointer early instead of late. A few other users of our string hashes also wanted to mix in their own pointers into the hash, and those are updated to use the same mechanism. Hash users that don't have any particular initial salt can just use the NULL pointer as a no-salt. Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Cc: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-06-10 07:51:30 -07:00
<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions This is just the infrastructure; there are no users yet. This is modelled on CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM; a CONFIG_ symbol declares the existence of <asm/hash.h>. That file may define its own versions of various functions, and define HAVE_* symbols (no CONFIG_ prefix!) to suppress the generic ones. Included is a self-test (in lib/test_hash.c) that verifies the basics. It is NOT in general required that the arch-specific functions compute the same thing as the generic, but if a HAVE_* symbol is defined with the value 1, then equality is tested. Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macq.eu> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Cc: Alistair Francis <alistai@xilinx.com> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
2016-05-26 22:11:51 -04:00
lib/test_hash.c: fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation Some versions of gcc don't like tests for the value of an undefined preprocessor symbol, even in the #else branch of an #ifndef: lib/test_hash.c:224:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1 ^ lib/test_hash.c:229:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1 ^ lib/test_hash.c:234:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1 ^ Seen with gcc 4.9, not seen with 4.1.2. Change the logic to only check the value inside an #ifdef to fix this. Fixes: 468a9428521e7d00 ("<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160829214952.1334674-4-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-09-01 16:14:53 -07:00
<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions This is just the infrastructure; there are no users yet. This is modelled on CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM; a CONFIG_ symbol declares the existence of <asm/hash.h>. That file may define its own versions of various functions, and define HAVE_* symbols (no CONFIG_ prefix!) to suppress the generic ones. Included is a self-test (in lib/test_hash.c) that verifies the basics. It is NOT in general required that the arch-specific functions compute the same thing as the generic, but if a HAVE_* symbol is defined with the value 1, then equality is tested. Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macq.eu> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Cc: Alistair Francis <alistai@xilinx.com> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
2016-05-26 22:11:51 -04:00
lib/test_hash.c: fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation Some versions of gcc don't like tests for the value of an undefined preprocessor symbol, even in the #else branch of an #ifndef: lib/test_hash.c:224:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1 ^ lib/test_hash.c:229:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1 ^ lib/test_hash.c:234:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1 ^ Seen with gcc 4.9, not seen with 4.1.2. Change the logic to only check the value inside an #ifdef to fix this. Fixes: 468a9428521e7d00 ("<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160829214952.1334674-4-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-09-01 16:14:53 -07:00
<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions This is just the infrastructure; there are no users yet. This is modelled on CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM; a CONFIG_ symbol declares the existence of <asm/hash.h>. That file may define its own versions of various functions, and define HAVE_* symbols (no CONFIG_ prefix!) to suppress the generic ones. Included is a self-test (in lib/test_hash.c) that verifies the basics. It is NOT in general required that the arch-specific functions compute the same thing as the generic, but if a HAVE_* symbol is defined with the value 1, then equality is tested. Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macq.eu> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Cc: Alistair Francis <alistai@xilinx.com> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
2016-05-26 22:11:51 -04:00
lib/test_hash.c: fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation Some versions of gcc don't like tests for the value of an undefined preprocessor symbol, even in the #else branch of an #ifndef: lib/test_hash.c:224:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1 ^ lib/test_hash.c:229:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1 ^ lib/test_hash.c:234:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1 ^ Seen with gcc 4.9, not seen with 4.1.2. Change the logic to only check the value inside an #ifdef to fix this. Fixes: 468a9428521e7d00 ("<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160829214952.1334674-4-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-09-01 16:14:53 -07:00
<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions This is just the infrastructure; there are no users yet. This is modelled on CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM; a CONFIG_ symbol declares the existence of <asm/hash.h>. That file may define its own versions of various functions, and define HAVE_* symbols (no CONFIG_ prefix!) to suppress the generic ones. Included is a self-test (in lib/test_hash.c) that verifies the basics. It is NOT in general required that the arch-specific functions compute the same thing as the generic, but if a HAVE_* symbol is defined with the value 1, then equality is tested. Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macq.eu> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Cc: Alistair Francis <alistai@xilinx.com> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
2016-05-26 22:11:51 -04:00
lib/test_hash.c: fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation Some versions of gcc don't like tests for the value of an undefined preprocessor symbol, even in the #else branch of an #ifndef: lib/test_hash.c:224:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1 ^ lib/test_hash.c:229:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1 ^ lib/test_hash.c:234:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1 ^ Seen with gcc 4.9, not seen with 4.1.2. Change the logic to only check the value inside an #ifdef to fix this. Fixes: 468a9428521e7d00 ("<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160829214952.1334674-4-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-09-01 16:14:53 -07:00
<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions This is just the infrastructure; there are no users yet. This is modelled on CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM; a CONFIG_ symbol declares the existence of <asm/hash.h>. That file may define its own versions of various functions, and define HAVE_* symbols (no CONFIG_ prefix!) to suppress the generic ones. Included is a self-test (in lib/test_hash.c) that verifies the basics. It is NOT in general required that the arch-specific functions compute the same thing as the generic, but if a HAVE_* symbol is defined with the value 1, then equality is tested. Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macq.eu> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org Cc: Alistair Francis <alistai@xilinx.com> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp
2016-05-26 22:11:51 -04:00