This website requires JavaScript.
About
Status
₊˚⊹Discord
Explore
Register
Sign in
Reference in a new issue
Blame
Copy permalink
Reference in a new issue
Copy permalink
kernel
/
linux
Star
0
Fork
You've already forked linux
0
mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/
synced
2026-10-09 18:15:49 +00:00
Code
Issues
Releases
Packages
Activity
v5.5.3
linux
/
usr
/
include
/
Makefile
106 lines
3.1 KiB
Raw
Permalink
Normal View
History
kbuild: compile-test exported headers to ensure they are self-contained Multiple people have suggested compile-testing UAPI headers to ensure they can be really included from user-space. "make headers_check" is obviously not enough to catch bugs, and we often leak unresolved references to user-space. Use the new header-test-y syntax to implement it. Please note exported headers are compile-tested with a completely different set of compiler flags. The header search path is set to $(objtree)/usr/include since exported headers should not include unexported ones. We use -std=gnu89 for the kernel space since the kernel code highly depends on GNU extensions. On the other hand, UAPI headers should be written in more standardized C, so they are compiled with -std=c90. This will emit errors if C++ style comments, the keyword 'inline', etc. are used. Please use C style comments (/* ... */), '__inline__', etc. in UAPI headers. There is additional compiler requirement to enable this test because many of UAPI headers include <stdlib.h>, <sys/ioctl.h>, <sys/time.h>, etc. directly or indirectly. You cannot use kernel.org pre-built toolchains [1] since they lack <stdlib.h>. I reused CONFIG_CC_CAN_LINK to check the system header availability. The intention is slightly different, but a compiler that can link userspace programs provide system headers. For now, a lot of headers need to be excluded because they cannot be compiled standalone, but this is a good start point. [1] https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/index.html Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
2019-07-01 09:58:40 +09:00
kbuild: fix 'No such file or directory' warning when cleaning Since commit fcbb8461fd23 ("kbuild: remove header compile test"), 'make clean' with O= option in the pristine source tree emits 'No such file or directory' warning. $ git clean -d -f -x $ make O=foo clean make[1]: Entering directory '/home/masahiro/linux/foo' find: ‘usr/include’: No such file or directory make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/masahiro/linux/foo' Fixes: fcbb8461fd23 ("kbuild: remove header compile test") Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
2019-12-04 11:51:48 +09:00
kbuild: remove header compile test There are both positive and negative options about this feature. At first, I thought it was a good idea, but actually Linus stated a negative opinion (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/29/227). I admit it is ugly and annoying. The baseline I'd like to keep is the compile-test of uapi headers. (Otherwise, kernel developers have no way to ensure the correctness of the exported headers.) I will maintain a small build rule in usr/include/Makefile. Remove the other header test functionality. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-11-07 16:14:40 +09:00
kbuild: move headers_check rule to usr/include/Makefile Currently, some sanity checks for uapi headers are done by scripts/headers_check.pl, which is wired up to the 'headers_check' target in the top Makefile. It is true compiling headers has better test coverage, but there are still several headers excluded from the compile test. I like to keep headers_check.pl for a while, but we can delete a lot of code by moving the build rule to usr/include/Makefile. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-11-07 16:14:41 +09:00
kbuild: remove header compile test There are both positive and negative options about this feature. At first, I thought it was a good idea, but actually Linus stated a negative opinion (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/29/227). I admit it is ugly and annoying. The baseline I'd like to keep is the compile-test of uapi headers. (Otherwise, kernel developers have no way to ensure the correctness of the exported headers.) I will maintain a small build rule in usr/include/Makefile. Remove the other header test functionality. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-11-07 16:14:40 +09:00
kbuild: compile-test exported headers to ensure they are self-contained Multiple people have suggested compile-testing UAPI headers to ensure they can be really included from user-space. "make headers_check" is obviously not enough to catch bugs, and we often leak unresolved references to user-space. Use the new header-test-y syntax to implement it. Please note exported headers are compile-tested with a completely different set of compiler flags. The header search path is set to $(objtree)/usr/include since exported headers should not include unexported ones. We use -std=gnu89 for the kernel space since the kernel code highly depends on GNU extensions. On the other hand, UAPI headers should be written in more standardized C, so they are compiled with -std=c90. This will emit errors if C++ style comments, the keyword 'inline', etc. are used. Please use C style comments (/* ... */), '__inline__', etc. in UAPI headers. There is additional compiler requirement to enable this test because many of UAPI headers include <stdlib.h>, <sys/ioctl.h>, <sys/time.h>, etc. directly or indirectly. You cannot use kernel.org pre-built toolchains [1] since they lack <stdlib.h>. I reused CONFIG_CC_CAN_LINK to check the system header availability. The intention is slightly different, but a compiler that can link userspace programs provide system headers. For now, a lot of headers need to be excluded because they cannot be compiled standalone, but this is a good start point. [1] https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/index.html Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
2019-07-01 09:58:40 +09:00
kbuild: remove clean-dirs syntax The only the difference between clean-files and clean-dirs is the -r option passed to the 'rm' command. You can always pass -r, and then remove the clean-dirs syntax. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-08-25 10:31:27 +09:00