2019-06-03 07:44:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-15 10:13:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-20 18:35:53 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-15 10:13:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-15 10:13:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-15 10:13:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-19 09:23:59 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-30 15:05:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-01 15:42:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-02-19 09:23:59 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-15 10:13:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-14 13:22:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-30 14:48:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-16 16:32:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-15 20:10:45 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 13:52:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:09:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 13:52:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 13:52:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 13:52:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-22 20:47:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:09:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-07 17:10:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-10 01:45:59 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-28 20:12:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:02 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:02 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:02 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:05 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-10 01:45:59 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-28 20:12:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:19 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:16 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-22 00:17:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-14 18:48:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-22 00:17:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-14 18:48:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-22 00:17:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-14 18:48:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-22 00:17:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-11 18:34:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-22 00:17:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-01 05:54:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:09:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:09:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-21 09:26:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-21 09:26:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-21 09:26:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:09:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:09:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:09:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:09:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-01 05:54:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:09:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:09:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-21 09:26:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-21 09:26:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:24 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-21 09:26:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-04 16:53:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 13:52:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 13:52:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 13:52:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 13:52:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 13:52:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 13:52:22 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-07 17:52:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-07 17:52:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-26 01:39:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-26 01:39:56 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-10 15:51:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-10 15:51:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-10 15:51:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-10 15:51:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 16:54:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 16:54:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 16:54:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 16:54:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 16:54:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 16:54:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 16:48:25 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2012-12-06 10:39:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-11 01:21:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-05 13:43:17 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-10-11 01:21:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-03 17:37:31 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-03 17:37:34 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-10-31 17:12:32 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-03 17:37:31 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-11 01:21:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-30 14:48:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-25 15:02:17 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-30 15:05:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-30 14:48:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-30 15:05:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-30 14:48:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-30 15:05:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-30 14:48:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-23 16:05:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-23 16:05:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-26 11:41:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-26 11:41:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-26 11:41:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-26 11:41:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-26 11:41:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-26 11:41:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-26 11:41:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-26 11:41:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-06 23:02:51 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-26 11:41:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-06 23:02:51 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-23 16:05:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpumask: introduce cpumap_print_list/bitmask_to_buf to support large bitmask and list
The existing cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() is used by cpu topology and other
drivers to export hexadecimal bitmask and decimal list to userspace by
sysfs ABI.
Right now, those drivers are using a normal attribute for this kind of
ABIs. A normal attribute typically has show entry as below:
static ssize_t example_dev_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
...
return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &pmu_mmdc->cpu);
}
show entry of attribute has no offset and count parameters and this
means the file is limited to one page only.
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf() API works terribly well for this kind of
normal attribute with buf parameter and without offset, count:
static inline ssize_t
cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(bool list, char *buf, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
return bitmap_print_to_pagebuf(list, buf, cpumask_bits(mask),
nr_cpu_ids);
}
The problem is once we have many cpus, we have a chance to make bitmask
or list more than one page. Especially for list, it could be as complex
as 0,3,5,7,9,...... We have no simple way to know it exact size.
It turns out bin_attribute is a way to break this limit. bin_attribute
has show entry as below:
static ssize_t
example_bin_attribute_show(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
loff_t offset, size_t count)
{
...
}
With the new offset and count parameters, this makes sysfs ABI be able
to support file size more than one page. For example, offset could be
>= 4096.
This patch introduces cpumap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() and their bitmap
infrastructure bitmap_print_bitmask/list_to_buf() so that those drivers
can move to bin_attribute to support large bitmask and list. At the same
time, we have to pass those corresponding parameters such as offset, count
from bin_attribute to this new API.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806110251.560-2-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-08-06 23:02:47 +12:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:23 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:23 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:25 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:25 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-30 17:22:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-03 17:37:34 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:25 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-20 20:13:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:25 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:25 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-20 20:13:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:25 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:25 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-11 13:51:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:25 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-30 17:11:35 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-30 17:11:35 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:23 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitmap, irq: add smp_affinity_list interface to /proc/irq
Manually adjusting the smp_affinity for IRQ's becomes unwieldy when the
cpu count is large.
Setting smp affinity to cpus 256 to 263 would be:
echo 000000ff,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000 > smp_affinity
instead of:
echo 256-263 > smp_affinity_list
Think about what it looks like for cpus around say, 4088 to 4095.
We already have many alternate "list" interfaces:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/indexY/shared_cpu_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/thread_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/core_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/cpulist
/sys/devices/pci***/***/local_cpulist
Add a companion interface, smp_affinity_list to use cpu lists instead of
cpu maps. This conforms to other companion interfaces where both a map
and a list interface exists.
This required adding a bitmap_parselist_user() function in a manner
similar to the bitmap_parse_user() function.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: make __bitmap_parselist() static]
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-05-24 17:13:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-11 13:51:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-11 13:51:35 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitmap, irq: add smp_affinity_list interface to /proc/irq
Manually adjusting the smp_affinity for IRQ's becomes unwieldy when the
cpu count is large.
Setting smp affinity to cpus 256 to 263 would be:
echo 000000ff,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000 > smp_affinity
instead of:
echo 256-263 > smp_affinity_list
Think about what it looks like for cpus around say, 4088 to 4095.
We already have many alternate "list" interfaces:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/indexY/shared_cpu_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/thread_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/core_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/cpulist
/sys/devices/pci***/***/local_cpulist
Add a companion interface, smp_affinity_list to use cpu lists instead of
cpu maps. This conforms to other companion interfaces where both a map
and a list interface exists.
This required adding a bitmap_parselist_user() function in a manner
similar to the bitmap_parse_user() function.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: make __bitmap_parselist() static]
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-05-24 17:13:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-21 03:08:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
bitmap, irq: add smp_affinity_list interface to /proc/irq
Manually adjusting the smp_affinity for IRQ's becomes unwieldy when the
cpu count is large.
Setting smp affinity to cpus 256 to 263 would be:
echo 000000ff,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000 > smp_affinity
instead of:
echo 256-263 > smp_affinity_list
Think about what it looks like for cpus around say, 4088 to 4095.
We already have many alternate "list" interfaces:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/indexY/shared_cpu_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/thread_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/core_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/cpulist
/sys/devices/pci***/***/local_cpulist
Add a companion interface, smp_affinity_list to use cpu lists instead of
cpu maps. This conforms to other companion interfaces where both a map
and a list interface exists.
This required adding a bitmap_parselist_user() function in a manner
similar to the bitmap_parse_user() function.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: make __bitmap_parselist() static]
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-05-24 17:13:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitmap, irq: add smp_affinity_list interface to /proc/irq
Manually adjusting the smp_affinity for IRQ's becomes unwieldy when the
cpu count is large.
Setting smp affinity to cpus 256 to 263 would be:
echo 000000ff,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000 > smp_affinity
instead of:
echo 256-263 > smp_affinity_list
Think about what it looks like for cpus around say, 4088 to 4095.
We already have many alternate "list" interfaces:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/indexY/shared_cpu_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/thread_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/core_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/cpulist
/sys/devices/pci***/***/local_cpulist
Add a companion interface, smp_affinity_list to use cpu lists instead of
cpu maps. This conforms to other companion interfaces where both a map
and a list interface exists.
This required adding a bitmap_parselist_user() function in a manner
similar to the bitmap_parse_user() function.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: make __bitmap_parselist() static]
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-05-24 17:13:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-23 16:05:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitmap, irq: add smp_affinity_list interface to /proc/irq
Manually adjusting the smp_affinity for IRQ's becomes unwieldy when the
cpu count is large.
Setting smp affinity to cpus 256 to 263 would be:
echo 000000ff,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000 > smp_affinity
instead of:
echo 256-263 > smp_affinity_list
Think about what it looks like for cpus around say, 4088 to 4095.
We already have many alternate "list" interfaces:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/indexY/shared_cpu_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/thread_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/core_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/cpulist
/sys/devices/pci***/***/local_cpulist
Add a companion interface, smp_affinity_list to use cpu lists instead of
cpu maps. This conforms to other companion interfaces where both a map
and a list interface exists.
This required adding a bitmap_parselist_user() function in a manner
similar to the bitmap_parse_user() function.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: make __bitmap_parselist() static]
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-05-24 17:13:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:43:11 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitmap, irq: add smp_affinity_list interface to /proc/irq
Manually adjusting the smp_affinity for IRQ's becomes unwieldy when the
cpu count is large.
Setting smp affinity to cpus 256 to 263 would be:
echo 000000ff,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000 > smp_affinity
instead of:
echo 256-263 > smp_affinity_list
Think about what it looks like for cpus around say, 4088 to 4095.
We already have many alternate "list" interfaces:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/indexY/shared_cpu_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/thread_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/core_siblings_list
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/cpulist
/sys/devices/pci***/***/local_cpulist
Add a companion interface, smp_affinity_list to use cpu lists instead of
cpu maps. This conforms to other companion interfaces where both a map
and a list interface exists.
This required adding a bitmap_parselist_user() function in a manner
similar to the bitmap_parse_user() function.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: make __bitmap_parselist() static]
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-05-24 17:13:12 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-03 17:37:34 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-10 18:41:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-03 17:37:34 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-10 18:41:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-03 17:37:34 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-10 18:41:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-03 17:37:34 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-10 01:45:59 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-05 13:43:17 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:07 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:07 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] cpuset: better bitmap remap defaults
Fix the default behaviour for the remap operators in bitmap, cpumask and
nodemask.
As previously submitted, the pair of masks <A, B> defined a map of the
positions of the set bits in A to the corresponding bits in B. This is still
true.
The issue is how to map the other positions, corresponding to the unset (0)
bits in A. As previously submitted, they were all mapped to the first set bit
position in B, a constant map.
When I tried to code per-vma mempolicy rebinding using these remap operators,
I realized this was wrong.
This patch changes the default to map all the unset bit positions in A to the
same positions in B, the identity map.
For example, if A has bits 4-7 set, and B has bits 9-12 set, then the map
defined by the pair <A, B> maps each bit position in the first 32 bits as
follows:
0 ==> 0
...
3 ==> 3
4 ==> 9
...
7 ==> 12
8 ==> 8
9 ==> 9
...
31 ==> 31
This now corresponds to the typical behaviour desired when migrating pages and
policies from one cpuset to another.
The pages on nodes within the original cpuset, and the references in memory
policies to nodes within the original cpuset, are migrated to the
corresponding cpuset-relative nodes in the destination cpuset. Other pages
and node references are left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-08 01:01:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:07 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:07 -08:00
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] cpuset: better bitmap remap defaults
Fix the default behaviour for the remap operators in bitmap, cpumask and
nodemask.
As previously submitted, the pair of masks <A, B> defined a map of the
positions of the set bits in A to the corresponding bits in B. This is still
true.
The issue is how to map the other positions, corresponding to the unset (0)
bits in A. As previously submitted, they were all mapped to the first set bit
position in B, a constant map.
When I tried to code per-vma mempolicy rebinding using these remap operators,
I realized this was wrong.
This patch changes the default to map all the unset bit positions in A to the
same positions in B, the identity map.
For example, if A has bits 4-7 set, and B has bits 9-12 set, then the map
defined by the pair <A, B> maps each bit position in the first 32 bits as
follows:
0 ==> 0
...
3 ==> 3
4 ==> 9
...
7 ==> 12
8 ==> 8
9 ==> 9
...
31 ==> 31
This now corresponds to the typical behaviour desired when migrating pages and
policies from one cpuset to another.
The pages on nodes within the original cpuset, and the references in memory
policies to nodes within the original cpuset, are migrated to the
corresponding cpuset-relative nodes in the destination cpuset. Other pages
and node references are left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-08 01:01:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:07 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-05 13:43:17 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] cpuset: better bitmap remap defaults
Fix the default behaviour for the remap operators in bitmap, cpumask and
nodemask.
As previously submitted, the pair of masks <A, B> defined a map of the
positions of the set bits in A to the corresponding bits in B. This is still
true.
The issue is how to map the other positions, corresponding to the unset (0)
bits in A. As previously submitted, they were all mapped to the first set bit
position in B, a constant map.
When I tried to code per-vma mempolicy rebinding using these remap operators,
I realized this was wrong.
This patch changes the default to map all the unset bit positions in A to the
same positions in B, the identity map.
For example, if A has bits 4-7 set, and B has bits 9-12 set, then the map
defined by the pair <A, B> maps each bit position in the first 32 bits as
follows:
0 ==> 0
...
3 ==> 3
4 ==> 9
...
7 ==> 12
8 ==> 8
9 ==> 9
...
31 ==> 31
This now corresponds to the typical behaviour desired when migrating pages and
policies from one cpuset to another.
The pages on nodes within the original cpuset, and the references in memory
policies to nodes within the original cpuset, are migrated to the
corresponding cpuset-relative nodes in the destination cpuset. Other pages
and node references are left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-08 01:01:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] cpuset: better bitmap remap defaults
Fix the default behaviour for the remap operators in bitmap, cpumask and
nodemask.
As previously submitted, the pair of masks <A, B> defined a map of the
positions of the set bits in A to the corresponding bits in B. This is still
true.
The issue is how to map the other positions, corresponding to the unset (0)
bits in A. As previously submitted, they were all mapped to the first set bit
position in B, a constant map.
When I tried to code per-vma mempolicy rebinding using these remap operators,
I realized this was wrong.
This patch changes the default to map all the unset bit positions in A to the
same positions in B, the identity map.
For example, if A has bits 4-7 set, and B has bits 9-12 set, then the map
defined by the pair <A, B> maps each bit position in the first 32 bits as
follows:
0 ==> 0
...
3 ==> 3
4 ==> 9
...
7 ==> 12
8 ==> 8
9 ==> 9
...
31 ==> 31
This now corresponds to the typical behaviour desired when migrating pages and
policies from one cpuset to another.
The pages on nodes within the original cpuset, and the references in memory
policies to nodes within the original cpuset, are migrated to the
corresponding cpuset-relative nodes in the destination cpuset. Other pages
and node references are left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-08 01:01:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] cpuset: better bitmap remap defaults
Fix the default behaviour for the remap operators in bitmap, cpumask and
nodemask.
As previously submitted, the pair of masks <A, B> defined a map of the
positions of the set bits in A to the corresponding bits in B. This is still
true.
The issue is how to map the other positions, corresponding to the unset (0)
bits in A. As previously submitted, they were all mapped to the first set bit
position in B, a constant map.
When I tried to code per-vma mempolicy rebinding using these remap operators,
I realized this was wrong.
This patch changes the default to map all the unset bit positions in A to the
same positions in B, the identity map.
For example, if A has bits 4-7 set, and B has bits 9-12 set, then the map
defined by the pair <A, B> maps each bit position in the first 32 bits as
follows:
0 ==> 0
...
3 ==> 3
4 ==> 9
...
7 ==> 12
8 ==> 8
9 ==> 9
...
31 ==> 31
This now corresponds to the typical behaviour desired when migrating pages and
policies from one cpuset to another.
The pages on nodes within the original cpuset, and the references in memory
policies to nodes within the original cpuset, are migrated to the
corresponding cpuset-relative nodes in the destination cpuset. Other pages
and node references are left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-08 01:01:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] cpuset: better bitmap remap defaults
Fix the default behaviour for the remap operators in bitmap, cpumask and
nodemask.
As previously submitted, the pair of masks <A, B> defined a map of the
positions of the set bits in A to the corresponding bits in B. This is still
true.
The issue is how to map the other positions, corresponding to the unset (0)
bits in A. As previously submitted, they were all mapped to the first set bit
position in B, a constant map.
When I tried to code per-vma mempolicy rebinding using these remap operators,
I realized this was wrong.
This patch changes the default to map all the unset bit positions in A to the
same positions in B, the identity map.
For example, if A has bits 4-7 set, and B has bits 9-12 set, then the map
defined by the pair <A, B> maps each bit position in the first 32 bits as
follows:
0 ==> 0
...
3 ==> 3
4 ==> 9
...
7 ==> 12
8 ==> 8
9 ==> 9
...
31 ==> 31
This now corresponds to the typical behaviour desired when migrating pages and
policies from one cpuset to another.
The pages on nodes within the original cpuset, and the references in memory
policies to nodes within the original cpuset, are migrated to the
corresponding cpuset-relative nodes in the destination cpuset. Other pages
and node references are left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-08 01:01:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] cpuset: better bitmap remap defaults
Fix the default behaviour for the remap operators in bitmap, cpumask and
nodemask.
As previously submitted, the pair of masks <A, B> defined a map of the
positions of the set bits in A to the corresponding bits in B. This is still
true.
The issue is how to map the other positions, corresponding to the unset (0)
bits in A. As previously submitted, they were all mapped to the first set bit
position in B, a constant map.
When I tried to code per-vma mempolicy rebinding using these remap operators,
I realized this was wrong.
This patch changes the default to map all the unset bit positions in A to the
same positions in B, the identity map.
For example, if A has bits 4-7 set, and B has bits 9-12 set, then the map
defined by the pair <A, B> maps each bit position in the first 32 bits as
follows:
0 ==> 0
...
3 ==> 3
4 ==> 9
...
7 ==> 12
8 ==> 8
9 ==> 9
...
31 ==> 31
This now corresponds to the typical behaviour desired when migrating pages and
policies from one cpuset to another.
The pages on nodes within the original cpuset, and the references in memory
policies to nodes within the original cpuset, are migrated to the
corresponding cpuset-relative nodes in the destination cpuset. Other pages
and node references are left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-08 01:01:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-05 13:43:18 -08:00
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] cpuset: better bitmap remap defaults
Fix the default behaviour for the remap operators in bitmap, cpumask and
nodemask.
As previously submitted, the pair of masks <A, B> defined a map of the
positions of the set bits in A to the corresponding bits in B. This is still
true.
The issue is how to map the other positions, corresponding to the unset (0)
bits in A. As previously submitted, they were all mapped to the first set bit
position in B, a constant map.
When I tried to code per-vma mempolicy rebinding using these remap operators,
I realized this was wrong.
This patch changes the default to map all the unset bit positions in A to the
same positions in B, the identity map.
For example, if A has bits 4-7 set, and B has bits 9-12 set, then the map
defined by the pair <A, B> maps each bit position in the first 32 bits as
follows:
0 ==> 0
...
3 ==> 3
4 ==> 9
...
7 ==> 12
8 ==> 8
9 ==> 9
...
31 ==> 31
This now corresponds to the typical behaviour desired when migrating pages and
policies from one cpuset to another.
The pages on nodes within the original cpuset, and the references in memory
policies to nodes within the original cpuset, are migrated to the
corresponding cpuset-relative nodes in the destination cpuset. Other pages
and node references are left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-08 01:01:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-10 22:46:29 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] cpuset: better bitmap remap defaults
Fix the default behaviour for the remap operators in bitmap, cpumask and
nodemask.
As previously submitted, the pair of masks <A, B> defined a map of the
positions of the set bits in A to the corresponding bits in B. This is still
true.
The issue is how to map the other positions, corresponding to the unset (0)
bits in A. As previously submitted, they were all mapped to the first set bit
position in B, a constant map.
When I tried to code per-vma mempolicy rebinding using these remap operators,
I realized this was wrong.
This patch changes the default to map all the unset bit positions in A to the
same positions in B, the identity map.
For example, if A has bits 4-7 set, and B has bits 9-12 set, then the map
defined by the pair <A, B> maps each bit position in the first 32 bits as
follows:
0 ==> 0
...
3 ==> 3
4 ==> 9
...
7 ==> 12
8 ==> 8
9 ==> 9
...
31 ==> 31
This now corresponds to the typical behaviour desired when migrating pages and
policies from one cpuset to another.
The pages on nodes within the original cpuset, and the references in memory
policies to nodes within the original cpuset, are migrated to the
corresponding cpuset-relative nodes in the destination cpuset. Other pages
and node references are left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-08 01:01:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] cpuset: better bitmap remap defaults
Fix the default behaviour for the remap operators in bitmap, cpumask and
nodemask.
As previously submitted, the pair of masks <A, B> defined a map of the
positions of the set bits in A to the corresponding bits in B. This is still
true.
The issue is how to map the other positions, corresponding to the unset (0)
bits in A. As previously submitted, they were all mapped to the first set bit
position in B, a constant map.
When I tried to code per-vma mempolicy rebinding using these remap operators,
I realized this was wrong.
This patch changes the default to map all the unset bit positions in A to the
same positions in B, the identity map.
For example, if A has bits 4-7 set, and B has bits 9-12 set, then the map
defined by the pair <A, B> maps each bit position in the first 32 bits as
follows:
0 ==> 0
...
3 ==> 3
4 ==> 9
...
7 ==> 12
8 ==> 8
9 ==> 9
...
31 ==> 31
This now corresponds to the typical behaviour desired when migrating pages and
policies from one cpuset to another.
The pages on nodes within the original cpuset, and the references in memory
policies to nodes within the original cpuset, are migrated to the
corresponding cpuset-relative nodes in the destination cpuset. Other pages
and node references are left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-08 01:01:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[PATCH] cpuset: better bitmap remap defaults
Fix the default behaviour for the remap operators in bitmap, cpumask and
nodemask.
As previously submitted, the pair of masks <A, B> defined a map of the
positions of the set bits in A to the corresponding bits in B. This is still
true.
The issue is how to map the other positions, corresponding to the unset (0)
bits in A. As previously submitted, they were all mapped to the first set bit
position in B, a constant map.
When I tried to code per-vma mempolicy rebinding using these remap operators,
I realized this was wrong.
This patch changes the default to map all the unset bit positions in A to the
same positions in B, the identity map.
For example, if A has bits 4-7 set, and B has bits 9-12 set, then the map
defined by the pair <A, B> maps each bit position in the first 32 bits as
follows:
0 ==> 0
...
3 ==> 3
4 ==> 9
...
7 ==> 12
8 ==> 8
9 ==> 9
...
31 ==> 31
This now corresponds to the typical behaviour desired when migrating pages and
policies from one cpuset to another.
The pages on nodes within the original cpuset, and the references in memory
policies to nodes within the original cpuset, are migrated to the
corresponding cpuset-relative nodes in the destination cpuset. Other pages
and node references are left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-08 01:01:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-10 22:46:29 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-10-30 15:02:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-10 22:46:29 +03:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-09 01:27:23 +09:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-30 22:57:33 -03:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-30 17:11:35 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-30 17:11:35 -03:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-30 17:11:35 -03:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-30 17:11:35 -03:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-30 17:11:35 -03:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-30 17:11:35 -03:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-30 17:11:35 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-30 17:11:35 -03:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:01 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:01 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-05 13:43:18 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:04 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:04 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:04 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:04 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 15:02:04 -08:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 15:42:43 -07:00
|
|
|
|
mempolicy: add bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold() operations
The following adds two more bitmap operators, bitmap_onto() and bitmap_fold(),
with the usual cpumask and nodemask wrappers.
The bitmap_onto() operator computes one bitmap relative to another. If the
n-th bit in the origin mask is set, then the m-th bit of the destination mask
will be set, where m is the position of the n-th set bit in the relative mask.
The bitmap_fold() operator folds a bitmap into a second that has bit m set iff
the input bitmap has some bit n set, where m == n mod sz, for the specified sz
value.
There are two substantive changes between this patch and its
predecessor bitmap_relative:
1) Renamed bitmap_relative() to be bitmap_onto().
2) Added bitmap_fold().
The essential motivation for bitmap_onto() is to provide a mechanism for
converting a cpuset-relative CPU or Node mask to an absolute mask. Cpuset
relative masks are written as if the current task were in a cpuset whose CPUs
or Nodes were just the consecutive ones numbered 0..N-1, for some N. The
bitmap_onto() operator is provided in anticipation of adding support for the
first such cpuset relative mask, by the mbind() and set_mempolicy() system
calls, using a planned flag of MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES. These bitmap operators
(and their nodemask wrappers, in particular) will be used in code that
converts the user specified cpuset relative memory policy to a specific system
node numbered policy, given the current mems_allowed of the tasks cpuset.
Such cpuset relative mempolicies will address two deficiencies
of the existing interface between cpusets and mempolicies:
1) A task cannot at present reliably establish a cpuset
relative mempolicy because there is an essential race
condition, in that the tasks cpuset may be changed in
between the time the task can query its cpuset placement,
and the time the task can issue the applicable mbind or
set_memplicy system call.
2) A task cannot at present establish what cpuset relative
mempolicy it would like to have, if it is in a smaller
cpuset than it might have mempolicy preferences for,
because the existing interface only allows specifying
mempolicies for nodes currently allowed by the cpuset.
Cpuset relative mempolicies are useful for tasks that don't distinguish
particularly between one CPU or Node and another, but only between how many of
each are allowed, and the proper placement of threads and memory pages on the
various CPUs and Nodes available.
The motivation for the added bitmap_fold() can be seen in the following
example.
Let's say an application has specified some mempolicies that presume 16 memory
nodes, including say a mempolicy that specified MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (cpuset
relative) nodes 12-15. Then lets say that application is crammed into a
cpuset that only has 8 memory nodes, 0-7. If one just uses bitmap_onto(),
this mempolicy, mapped to that cpuset, would ignore the requested relative
nodes above 7, leaving it empty of nodes. That's not good; better to fold the
higher nodes down, so that some nodes are included in the resulting mapped
mempolicy. In this case, the mempolicy nodes 12-15 are taken modulo 8 (the
weight of the mems_allowed of the confining cpuset), resulting in a mempolicy
specifying nodes 4-7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-28 02:12:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:45 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-12 19:32:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-12 19:32:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-02-10 01:45:59 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-03-24 03:15:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 16:10:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-09-17 16:34:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:00 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:35:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-09-17 16:34:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:35:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-09-17 16:34:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:35:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-09-17 16:34:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:35:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-09-17 16:34:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 14:36:00 -08:00
|
|
|
|
bitmap: new bitmap_copy_safe and bitmap_{from,to}_arr32
This patchset replaces bitmap_{to,from}_u32array with more simple and
standard looking copy-like functions.
bitmap_from_u32array() takes 4 arguments (bitmap_to_u32array is similar):
- unsigned long *bitmap, which is destination;
- unsigned int nbits, the length of destination bitmap, in bits;
- const u32 *buf, the source; and
- unsigned int nwords, the length of source buffer in ints.
In description to the function it is detailed like:
* copy min(nbits, 32*nwords) bits from @buf to @bitmap, remaining
* bits between nword and nbits in @bitmap (if any) are cleared.
Having two size arguments looks unneeded and potentially dangerous.
It is unneeded because normally user of copy-like function should take
care of the size of destination and make it big enough to fit source
data.
And it is dangerous because function may hide possible error if user
doesn't provide big enough bitmap, and data becomes silently dropped.
That's why all copy-like functions have 1 argument for size of copying
data, and I don't see any reason to make bitmap_from_u32array()
different.
One exception that comes in mind is strncpy() which also provides size
of destination in arguments, but it's strongly argued by the possibility
of taking broken strings in source. This is not the case of
bitmap_{from,to}_u32array().
There is no many real users of bitmap_{from,to}_u32array(), and they all
very clearly provide size of destination matched with the size of
source, so additional functionality is not used in fact. Like this:
bitmap_from_u32array(to->link_modes.supported,
__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS,
link_usettings.link_modes.supported,
__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32);
Where:
#define __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32 \
DIV_ROUND_UP(__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS, 32)
In this patch, bitmap_copy_safe and bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 are introduced.
'Safe' in bitmap_copy_safe() stands for clearing unused bits in bitmap
beyond last bit till the end of last word. It is useful for hardening
API when bitmap is assumed to be exposed to userspace.
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 functions are replacements for
bitmap_{from,to}_u32array. They don't take unneeded nwords argument, and
so simpler in implementation and understanding.
This patch suggests optimization for 32-bit systems - aliasing
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 to bitmap_copy_safe.
Other possible optimization is aliasing 64-bit LE bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 to
more generic function(s). But I didn't end up with the function that would
be helpful by itself, and can be used to alias 64-bit LE
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32, like bitmap_copy_safe() does. So I preferred to
leave things as is.
The following patch switches kernel to new API and introduces test for it.
Discussion is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/15/592
[ynorov@caviumnetworks.com: rename bitmap_copy_safe to bitmap_copy_clear_tail]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180201172508.5739-3-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171228150019.27953-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: David Decotigny <decot@googlers.com>,
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 15:38:02 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-01 15:42:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-30 11:41:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-01 15:42:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-15 10:13:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitmap: new bitmap_copy_safe and bitmap_{from,to}_arr32
This patchset replaces bitmap_{to,from}_u32array with more simple and
standard looking copy-like functions.
bitmap_from_u32array() takes 4 arguments (bitmap_to_u32array is similar):
- unsigned long *bitmap, which is destination;
- unsigned int nbits, the length of destination bitmap, in bits;
- const u32 *buf, the source; and
- unsigned int nwords, the length of source buffer in ints.
In description to the function it is detailed like:
* copy min(nbits, 32*nwords) bits from @buf to @bitmap, remaining
* bits between nword and nbits in @bitmap (if any) are cleared.
Having two size arguments looks unneeded and potentially dangerous.
It is unneeded because normally user of copy-like function should take
care of the size of destination and make it big enough to fit source
data.
And it is dangerous because function may hide possible error if user
doesn't provide big enough bitmap, and data becomes silently dropped.
That's why all copy-like functions have 1 argument for size of copying
data, and I don't see any reason to make bitmap_from_u32array()
different.
One exception that comes in mind is strncpy() which also provides size
of destination in arguments, but it's strongly argued by the possibility
of taking broken strings in source. This is not the case of
bitmap_{from,to}_u32array().
There is no many real users of bitmap_{from,to}_u32array(), and they all
very clearly provide size of destination matched with the size of
source, so additional functionality is not used in fact. Like this:
bitmap_from_u32array(to->link_modes.supported,
__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS,
link_usettings.link_modes.supported,
__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32);
Where:
#define __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32 \
DIV_ROUND_UP(__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS, 32)
In this patch, bitmap_copy_safe and bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 are introduced.
'Safe' in bitmap_copy_safe() stands for clearing unused bits in bitmap
beyond last bit till the end of last word. It is useful for hardening
API when bitmap is assumed to be exposed to userspace.
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 functions are replacements for
bitmap_{from,to}_u32array. They don't take unneeded nwords argument, and
so simpler in implementation and understanding.
This patch suggests optimization for 32-bit systems - aliasing
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 to bitmap_copy_safe.
Other possible optimization is aliasing 64-bit LE bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 to
more generic function(s). But I didn't end up with the function that would
be helpful by itself, and can be used to alias 64-bit LE
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32, like bitmap_copy_safe() does. So I preferred to
leave things as is.
The following patch switches kernel to new API and introduces test for it.
Discussion is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/15/592
[ynorov@caviumnetworks.com: rename bitmap_copy_safe to bitmap_copy_clear_tail]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180201172508.5739-3-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171228150019.27953-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: David Decotigny <decot@googlers.com>,
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 15:38:02 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-21 21:56:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
bitmap: new bitmap_copy_safe and bitmap_{from,to}_arr32
This patchset replaces bitmap_{to,from}_u32array with more simple and
standard looking copy-like functions.
bitmap_from_u32array() takes 4 arguments (bitmap_to_u32array is similar):
- unsigned long *bitmap, which is destination;
- unsigned int nbits, the length of destination bitmap, in bits;
- const u32 *buf, the source; and
- unsigned int nwords, the length of source buffer in ints.
In description to the function it is detailed like:
* copy min(nbits, 32*nwords) bits from @buf to @bitmap, remaining
* bits between nword and nbits in @bitmap (if any) are cleared.
Having two size arguments looks unneeded and potentially dangerous.
It is unneeded because normally user of copy-like function should take
care of the size of destination and make it big enough to fit source
data.
And it is dangerous because function may hide possible error if user
doesn't provide big enough bitmap, and data becomes silently dropped.
That's why all copy-like functions have 1 argument for size of copying
data, and I don't see any reason to make bitmap_from_u32array()
different.
One exception that comes in mind is strncpy() which also provides size
of destination in arguments, but it's strongly argued by the possibility
of taking broken strings in source. This is not the case of
bitmap_{from,to}_u32array().
There is no many real users of bitmap_{from,to}_u32array(), and they all
very clearly provide size of destination matched with the size of
source, so additional functionality is not used in fact. Like this:
bitmap_from_u32array(to->link_modes.supported,
__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS,
link_usettings.link_modes.supported,
__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32);
Where:
#define __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32 \
DIV_ROUND_UP(__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS, 32)
In this patch, bitmap_copy_safe and bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 are introduced.
'Safe' in bitmap_copy_safe() stands for clearing unused bits in bitmap
beyond last bit till the end of last word. It is useful for hardening
API when bitmap is assumed to be exposed to userspace.
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 functions are replacements for
bitmap_{from,to}_u32array. They don't take unneeded nwords argument, and
so simpler in implementation and understanding.
This patch suggests optimization for 32-bit systems - aliasing
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 to bitmap_copy_safe.
Other possible optimization is aliasing 64-bit LE bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 to
more generic function(s). But I didn't end up with the function that would
be helpful by itself, and can be used to alias 64-bit LE
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32, like bitmap_copy_safe() does. So I preferred to
leave things as is.
The following patch switches kernel to new API and introduces test for it.
Discussion is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/15/592
[ynorov@caviumnetworks.com: rename bitmap_copy_safe to bitmap_copy_clear_tail]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180201172508.5739-3-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171228150019.27953-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: David Decotigny <decot@googlers.com>,
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 15:38:02 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-28 13:51:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitmap: new bitmap_copy_safe and bitmap_{from,to}_arr32
This patchset replaces bitmap_{to,from}_u32array with more simple and
standard looking copy-like functions.
bitmap_from_u32array() takes 4 arguments (bitmap_to_u32array is similar):
- unsigned long *bitmap, which is destination;
- unsigned int nbits, the length of destination bitmap, in bits;
- const u32 *buf, the source; and
- unsigned int nwords, the length of source buffer in ints.
In description to the function it is detailed like:
* copy min(nbits, 32*nwords) bits from @buf to @bitmap, remaining
* bits between nword and nbits in @bitmap (if any) are cleared.
Having two size arguments looks unneeded and potentially dangerous.
It is unneeded because normally user of copy-like function should take
care of the size of destination and make it big enough to fit source
data.
And it is dangerous because function may hide possible error if user
doesn't provide big enough bitmap, and data becomes silently dropped.
That's why all copy-like functions have 1 argument for size of copying
data, and I don't see any reason to make bitmap_from_u32array()
different.
One exception that comes in mind is strncpy() which also provides size
of destination in arguments, but it's strongly argued by the possibility
of taking broken strings in source. This is not the case of
bitmap_{from,to}_u32array().
There is no many real users of bitmap_{from,to}_u32array(), and they all
very clearly provide size of destination matched with the size of
source, so additional functionality is not used in fact. Like this:
bitmap_from_u32array(to->link_modes.supported,
__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS,
link_usettings.link_modes.supported,
__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32);
Where:
#define __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32 \
DIV_ROUND_UP(__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS, 32)
In this patch, bitmap_copy_safe and bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 are introduced.
'Safe' in bitmap_copy_safe() stands for clearing unused bits in bitmap
beyond last bit till the end of last word. It is useful for hardening
API when bitmap is assumed to be exposed to userspace.
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 functions are replacements for
bitmap_{from,to}_u32array. They don't take unneeded nwords argument, and
so simpler in implementation and understanding.
This patch suggests optimization for 32-bit systems - aliasing
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 to bitmap_copy_safe.
Other possible optimization is aliasing 64-bit LE bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 to
more generic function(s). But I didn't end up with the function that would
be helpful by itself, and can be used to alias 64-bit LE
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32, like bitmap_copy_safe() does. So I preferred to
leave things as is.
The following patch switches kernel to new API and introduces test for it.
Discussion is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/15/592
[ynorov@caviumnetworks.com: rename bitmap_copy_safe to bitmap_copy_clear_tail]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180201172508.5739-3-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171228150019.27953-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: David Decotigny <decot@googlers.com>,
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 15:38:02 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-28 13:51:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-11 20:09:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-28 13:51:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitmap: new bitmap_copy_safe and bitmap_{from,to}_arr32
This patchset replaces bitmap_{to,from}_u32array with more simple and
standard looking copy-like functions.
bitmap_from_u32array() takes 4 arguments (bitmap_to_u32array is similar):
- unsigned long *bitmap, which is destination;
- unsigned int nbits, the length of destination bitmap, in bits;
- const u32 *buf, the source; and
- unsigned int nwords, the length of source buffer in ints.
In description to the function it is detailed like:
* copy min(nbits, 32*nwords) bits from @buf to @bitmap, remaining
* bits between nword and nbits in @bitmap (if any) are cleared.
Having two size arguments looks unneeded and potentially dangerous.
It is unneeded because normally user of copy-like function should take
care of the size of destination and make it big enough to fit source
data.
And it is dangerous because function may hide possible error if user
doesn't provide big enough bitmap, and data becomes silently dropped.
That's why all copy-like functions have 1 argument for size of copying
data, and I don't see any reason to make bitmap_from_u32array()
different.
One exception that comes in mind is strncpy() which also provides size
of destination in arguments, but it's strongly argued by the possibility
of taking broken strings in source. This is not the case of
bitmap_{from,to}_u32array().
There is no many real users of bitmap_{from,to}_u32array(), and they all
very clearly provide size of destination matched with the size of
source, so additional functionality is not used in fact. Like this:
bitmap_from_u32array(to->link_modes.supported,
__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS,
link_usettings.link_modes.supported,
__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32);
Where:
#define __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32 \
DIV_ROUND_UP(__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS, 32)
In this patch, bitmap_copy_safe and bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 are introduced.
'Safe' in bitmap_copy_safe() stands for clearing unused bits in bitmap
beyond last bit till the end of last word. It is useful for hardening
API when bitmap is assumed to be exposed to userspace.
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 functions are replacements for
bitmap_{from,to}_u32array. They don't take unneeded nwords argument, and
so simpler in implementation and understanding.
This patch suggests optimization for 32-bit systems - aliasing
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 to bitmap_copy_safe.
Other possible optimization is aliasing 64-bit LE bitmap_{from,to}_arr32 to
more generic function(s). But I didn't end up with the function that would
be helpful by itself, and can be used to alias 64-bit LE
bitmap_{from,to}_arr32, like bitmap_copy_safe() does. So I preferred to
leave things as is.
The following patch switches kernel to new API and introduces test for it.
Discussion is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/15/592
[ynorov@caviumnetworks.com: rename bitmap_copy_safe to bitmap_copy_clear_tail]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180201172508.5739-3-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171228150019.27953-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: David Decotigny <decot@googlers.com>,
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 15:38:02 -08:00
|
|
|
|
