linux/drivers/opp/of.c

1621 lines
40 KiB

PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
opp: Allocate the OPP table outside of opp_table_lock There is no critical section which needs protection with locks while allocating an OPP table, except while adding it to the opp_tables list. And taking the opp_table_lock for the entire duration causes circular dependency issues like the one mentioned below. This patch takes another approach to reduce the size of the critical section to avoid such issues, the details of that are present within the patch. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.4.72 #14 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ chrome/1865 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffdd34921750 (opp_table_lock){+.+.}, at: _find_opp_table+0x34/0x74 but task is already holding lock: ffffff81f0fc71a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: submit_lock_objects+0x70/0x1ec fscrypt: AES-256-CTS-CBC using implementation "cts-cbc-aes-ce" which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c ww_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x5c/0xc4 msm_gem_fault+0x2c/0x124 __do_fault+0x40/0x16c handle_mm_fault+0x7cc/0xd98 do_page_fault+0x230/0x3b4 do_translation_fault+0x5c/0x78 do_mem_abort+0x4c/0xb4 el0_da+0x1c/0x20 -> #3 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x70/0x98 compat_filldir+0xf8/0x48c dcache_readdir+0x70/0x1dc iterate_dir+0xd4/0x180 __arm64_compat_sys_getdents+0xa0/0x19c el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x178 el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x40 el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x10 -> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}: down_write+0x54/0x16c start_creating+0x68/0x128 debugfs_create_dir+0x28/0x114 opp_debug_register+0x8c/0xc0 _add_opp_dev_unlocked+0x5c/0x70 _add_opp_dev+0x38/0x58 _opp_get_opp_table+0xdc/0x1ac dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table_indexed+0x24/0x30 dev_pm_opp_of_add_table_indexed+0x48/0x84 of_genpd_add_provider_onecell+0xc0/0x1b8 rpmhpd_probe+0x240/0x268 platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc devm_of_platform_populate+0x58/0xa0 rpmh_rsc_probe+0x36c/0x3cc platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_bus_create+0x230/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc of_platform_default_populate_init+0xa8/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x1c8/0x3fc do_initcall_level+0xb4/0x10c do_basic_setup+0x30/0x48 kernel_init_freeable+0x124/0x1a4 kernel_init+0x14/0x104 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 -> #1 (&opp_table->lock){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50 _add_opp_dev+0x2c/0x58 _opp_get_opp_table+0xdc/0x1ac dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table_indexed+0x24/0x30 dev_pm_opp_of_add_table_indexed+0x48/0x84 of_genpd_add_provider_onecell+0xc0/0x1b8 rpmhpd_probe+0x240/0x268 platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc devm_of_platform_populate+0x58/0xa0 rpmh_rsc_probe+0x36c/0x3cc platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc devm_of_platform_populate+0x58/0xa0 rpmh_rsc_probe+0x36c/0x3cc platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_bus_create+0x230/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc of_platform_default_populate_init+0xa8/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x1c8/0x3fc do_initcall_level+0xb4/0x10c do_basic_setup+0x30/0x48 kernel_init_freeable+0x124/0x1a4 kernel_init+0x14/0x104 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 -> #0 (opp_table_lock){+.+.}: __lock_acquire+0xee4/0x2450 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x210 __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50 _find_opp_table+0x34/0x74 dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact+0x2c/0xdc a6xx_gmu_resume+0xc8/0xecc a6xx_pm_resume+0x148/0x200 adreno_resume+0x28/0x34 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x34/0x48 __rpm_callback+0x70/0x10c rpm_callback+0x34/0x8c rpm_resume+0x414/0x550 __pm_runtime_resume+0x7c/0xa0 msm_gpu_submit+0x60/0x1c0 msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0xadc/0xb60 drm_ioctl_kernel+0x9c/0x118 drm_ioctl+0x27c/0x408 drm_compat_ioctl+0xcc/0xdc __se_compat_sys_ioctl+0x100/0x206c __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x20/0x2c el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x178 el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x40 el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x10 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: opp_table_lock --> &mm->mmap_sem --> reservation_ww_class_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); lock(opp_table_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by chrome/1865: #0: ffffff81edecc0d8 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0x264/0xb60 #1: ffffff81d0000870 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}, at: msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0x8e8/0xb60 #2: ffffff81f0fc71a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: submit_lock_objects+0x70/0x1ec stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 1865 Comm: chrome Not tainted 5.4.72 #14 Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev1+) with LTE (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x158 show_stack+0x20/0x2c dump_stack+0xc8/0x160 print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 check_noncircular+0x1a8/0x1b0 __lock_acquire+0xee4/0x2450 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x210 __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50 _find_opp_table+0x34/0x74 dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact+0x2c/0xdc a6xx_gmu_resume+0xc8/0xecc a6xx_pm_resume+0x148/0x200 adreno_resume+0x28/0x34 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x34/0x48 __rpm_callback+0x70/0x10c rpm_callback+0x34/0x8c rpm_resume+0x414/0x550 __pm_runtime_resume+0x7c/0xa0 msm_gpu_submit+0x60/0x1c0 msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0xadc/0xb60 drm_ioctl_kernel+0x9c/0x118 drm_ioctl+0x27c/0x408 drm_compat_ioctl+0xcc/0xdc __se_compat_sys_ioctl+0x100/0x206c __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x20/0x2c el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x178 el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x40 el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x10 Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2020-10-27 16:53:21 +05:30
opp: Allocate the OPP table outside of opp_table_lock There is no critical section which needs protection with locks while allocating an OPP table, except while adding it to the opp_tables list. And taking the opp_table_lock for the entire duration causes circular dependency issues like the one mentioned below. This patch takes another approach to reduce the size of the critical section to avoid such issues, the details of that are present within the patch. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.4.72 #14 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ chrome/1865 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffdd34921750 (opp_table_lock){+.+.}, at: _find_opp_table+0x34/0x74 but task is already holding lock: ffffff81f0fc71a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: submit_lock_objects+0x70/0x1ec fscrypt: AES-256-CTS-CBC using implementation "cts-cbc-aes-ce" which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c ww_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x5c/0xc4 msm_gem_fault+0x2c/0x124 __do_fault+0x40/0x16c handle_mm_fault+0x7cc/0xd98 do_page_fault+0x230/0x3b4 do_translation_fault+0x5c/0x78 do_mem_abort+0x4c/0xb4 el0_da+0x1c/0x20 -> #3 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x70/0x98 compat_filldir+0xf8/0x48c dcache_readdir+0x70/0x1dc iterate_dir+0xd4/0x180 __arm64_compat_sys_getdents+0xa0/0x19c el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x178 el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x40 el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x10 -> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}: down_write+0x54/0x16c start_creating+0x68/0x128 debugfs_create_dir+0x28/0x114 opp_debug_register+0x8c/0xc0 _add_opp_dev_unlocked+0x5c/0x70 _add_opp_dev+0x38/0x58 _opp_get_opp_table+0xdc/0x1ac dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table_indexed+0x24/0x30 dev_pm_opp_of_add_table_indexed+0x48/0x84 of_genpd_add_provider_onecell+0xc0/0x1b8 rpmhpd_probe+0x240/0x268 platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc devm_of_platform_populate+0x58/0xa0 rpmh_rsc_probe+0x36c/0x3cc platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_bus_create+0x230/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc of_platform_default_populate_init+0xa8/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x1c8/0x3fc do_initcall_level+0xb4/0x10c do_basic_setup+0x30/0x48 kernel_init_freeable+0x124/0x1a4 kernel_init+0x14/0x104 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 -> #1 (&opp_table->lock){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50 _add_opp_dev+0x2c/0x58 _opp_get_opp_table+0xdc/0x1ac dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table_indexed+0x24/0x30 dev_pm_opp_of_add_table_indexed+0x48/0x84 of_genpd_add_provider_onecell+0xc0/0x1b8 rpmhpd_probe+0x240/0x268 platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc devm_of_platform_populate+0x58/0xa0 rpmh_rsc_probe+0x36c/0x3cc platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc devm_of_platform_populate+0x58/0xa0 rpmh_rsc_probe+0x36c/0x3cc platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_bus_create+0x230/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc of_platform_default_populate_init+0xa8/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x1c8/0x3fc do_initcall_level+0xb4/0x10c do_basic_setup+0x30/0x48 kernel_init_freeable+0x124/0x1a4 kernel_init+0x14/0x104 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 -> #0 (opp_table_lock){+.+.}: __lock_acquire+0xee4/0x2450 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x210 __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50 _find_opp_table+0x34/0x74 dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact+0x2c/0xdc a6xx_gmu_resume+0xc8/0xecc a6xx_pm_resume+0x148/0x200 adreno_resume+0x28/0x34 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x34/0x48 __rpm_callback+0x70/0x10c rpm_callback+0x34/0x8c rpm_resume+0x414/0x550 __pm_runtime_resume+0x7c/0xa0 msm_gpu_submit+0x60/0x1c0 msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0xadc/0xb60 drm_ioctl_kernel+0x9c/0x118 drm_ioctl+0x27c/0x408 drm_compat_ioctl+0xcc/0xdc __se_compat_sys_ioctl+0x100/0x206c __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x20/0x2c el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x178 el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x40 el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x10 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: opp_table_lock --> &mm->mmap_sem --> reservation_ww_class_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); lock(opp_table_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by chrome/1865: #0: ffffff81edecc0d8 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0x264/0xb60 #1: ffffff81d0000870 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}, at: msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0x8e8/0xb60 #2: ffffff81f0fc71a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: submit_lock_objects+0x70/0x1ec stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 1865 Comm: chrome Not tainted 5.4.72 #14 Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev1+) with LTE (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x158 show_stack+0x20/0x2c dump_stack+0xc8/0x160 print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 check_noncircular+0x1a8/0x1b0 __lock_acquire+0xee4/0x2450 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x210 __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50 _find_opp_table+0x34/0x74 dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact+0x2c/0xdc a6xx_gmu_resume+0xc8/0xecc a6xx_pm_resume+0x148/0x200 adreno_resume+0x28/0x34 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x34/0x48 __rpm_callback+0x70/0x10c rpm_callback+0x34/0x8c rpm_resume+0x414/0x550 __pm_runtime_resume+0x7c/0xa0 msm_gpu_submit+0x60/0x1c0 msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0xadc/0xb60 drm_ioctl_kernel+0x9c/0x118 drm_ioctl+0x27c/0x408 drm_compat_ioctl+0xcc/0xdc __se_compat_sys_ioctl+0x100/0x206c __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x20/0x2c el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x178 el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x40 el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x10 Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2020-10-27 16:53:21 +05:30
opp: Allocate the OPP table outside of opp_table_lock There is no critical section which needs protection with locks while allocating an OPP table, except while adding it to the opp_tables list. And taking the opp_table_lock for the entire duration causes circular dependency issues like the one mentioned below. This patch takes another approach to reduce the size of the critical section to avoid such issues, the details of that are present within the patch. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.4.72 #14 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ chrome/1865 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffdd34921750 (opp_table_lock){+.+.}, at: _find_opp_table+0x34/0x74 but task is already holding lock: ffffff81f0fc71a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: submit_lock_objects+0x70/0x1ec fscrypt: AES-256-CTS-CBC using implementation "cts-cbc-aes-ce" which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c ww_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x5c/0xc4 msm_gem_fault+0x2c/0x124 __do_fault+0x40/0x16c handle_mm_fault+0x7cc/0xd98 do_page_fault+0x230/0x3b4 do_translation_fault+0x5c/0x78 do_mem_abort+0x4c/0xb4 el0_da+0x1c/0x20 -> #3 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x70/0x98 compat_filldir+0xf8/0x48c dcache_readdir+0x70/0x1dc iterate_dir+0xd4/0x180 __arm64_compat_sys_getdents+0xa0/0x19c el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x178 el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x40 el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x10 -> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}: down_write+0x54/0x16c start_creating+0x68/0x128 debugfs_create_dir+0x28/0x114 opp_debug_register+0x8c/0xc0 _add_opp_dev_unlocked+0x5c/0x70 _add_opp_dev+0x38/0x58 _opp_get_opp_table+0xdc/0x1ac dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table_indexed+0x24/0x30 dev_pm_opp_of_add_table_indexed+0x48/0x84 of_genpd_add_provider_onecell+0xc0/0x1b8 rpmhpd_probe+0x240/0x268 platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc devm_of_platform_populate+0x58/0xa0 rpmh_rsc_probe+0x36c/0x3cc platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_bus_create+0x230/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc of_platform_default_populate_init+0xa8/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x1c8/0x3fc do_initcall_level+0xb4/0x10c do_basic_setup+0x30/0x48 kernel_init_freeable+0x124/0x1a4 kernel_init+0x14/0x104 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 -> #1 (&opp_table->lock){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50 _add_opp_dev+0x2c/0x58 _opp_get_opp_table+0xdc/0x1ac dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table_indexed+0x24/0x30 dev_pm_opp_of_add_table_indexed+0x48/0x84 of_genpd_add_provider_onecell+0xc0/0x1b8 rpmhpd_probe+0x240/0x268 platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc devm_of_platform_populate+0x58/0xa0 rpmh_rsc_probe+0x36c/0x3cc platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc devm_of_platform_populate+0x58/0xa0 rpmh_rsc_probe+0x36c/0x3cc platform_drv_probe+0x90/0xb0 really_probe+0x134/0x2ec driver_probe_device+0x64/0xfc __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0xa4 bus_for_each_drv+0x90/0xd8 __device_attach+0xc0/0x148 device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c bus_probe_device+0x34/0x94 device_add+0x1fc/0x3b0 of_device_add+0x3c/0x4c of_platform_device_create_pdata+0xb8/0xfc of_platform_bus_create+0x1e4/0x368 of_platform_bus_create+0x230/0x368 of_platform_populate+0x70/0xbc of_platform_default_populate_init+0xa8/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x1c8/0x3fc do_initcall_level+0xb4/0x10c do_basic_setup+0x30/0x48 kernel_init_freeable+0x124/0x1a4 kernel_init+0x14/0x104 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 -> #0 (opp_table_lock){+.+.}: __lock_acquire+0xee4/0x2450 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x210 __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50 _find_opp_table+0x34/0x74 dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact+0x2c/0xdc a6xx_gmu_resume+0xc8/0xecc a6xx_pm_resume+0x148/0x200 adreno_resume+0x28/0x34 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x34/0x48 __rpm_callback+0x70/0x10c rpm_callback+0x34/0x8c rpm_resume+0x414/0x550 __pm_runtime_resume+0x7c/0xa0 msm_gpu_submit+0x60/0x1c0 msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0xadc/0xb60 drm_ioctl_kernel+0x9c/0x118 drm_ioctl+0x27c/0x408 drm_compat_ioctl+0xcc/0xdc __se_compat_sys_ioctl+0x100/0x206c __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x20/0x2c el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x178 el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x40 el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x10 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: opp_table_lock --> &mm->mmap_sem --> reservation_ww_class_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); lock(opp_table_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by chrome/1865: #0: ffffff81edecc0d8 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0x264/0xb60 #1: ffffff81d0000870 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}, at: msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0x8e8/0xb60 #2: ffffff81f0fc71a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: submit_lock_objects+0x70/0x1ec stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 1865 Comm: chrome Not tainted 5.4.72 #14 Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev1+) with LTE (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x158 show_stack+0x20/0x2c dump_stack+0xc8/0x160 print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 check_noncircular+0x1a8/0x1b0 __lock_acquire+0xee4/0x2450 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x210 __mutex_lock_common+0xec/0xc0c mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50 _find_opp_table+0x34/0x74 dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact+0x2c/0xdc a6xx_gmu_resume+0xc8/0xecc a6xx_pm_resume+0x148/0x200 adreno_resume+0x28/0x34 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x34/0x48 __rpm_callback+0x70/0x10c rpm_callback+0x34/0x8c rpm_resume+0x414/0x550 __pm_runtime_resume+0x7c/0xa0 msm_gpu_submit+0x60/0x1c0 msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0xadc/0xb60 drm_ioctl_kernel+0x9c/0x118 drm_ioctl+0x27c/0x408 drm_compat_ioctl+0xcc/0xdc __se_compat_sys_ioctl+0x100/0x206c __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x20/0x2c el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x178 el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x40 el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x10 Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2020-10-27 16:53:21 +05:30
PM / OPP: _of_add_opp_table_v2(): increment count only if OPP is added Currently the _of_add_opp_table_v2 call loops through the OPP nodes in the operating-points-v2 table in the device tree and calls _opp_add_static_v2 for each to add them to the table. It counts each iteration through this loop as an added OPP, however there are cases where _opp_add_static_v2() returns 0 but no new OPP is added to the list. This can happen while adding duplicate OPP or if the OPP isn't supported by hardware. Because of this the count variable will contain the number of OPP nodes in the table in device tree but not necessarily the ones that are actually added. As this count value is what is checked to determine if there are any valid OPPs, if a platform has an operating-points-v2 table with all OPP nodes containing opp-supported-hw values that are not currently supported, then _of_add_opp_table_v2 will fail to abort as it should due to an empty table. Additionally, since commit 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper"), the same count variable is compared against the number of OPPs containing performance states and requires that either all or none have pstates set, however in the case of any opp table that has any entries that do not get added by _opp_add_static_v2 due to incompatible opp-supported-hw fields, these numbers will not match and _of_add_opp_table_v2 will incorrectly fail. We need to clearly identify all the three cases (success, failure, unsupported/duplicate OPPs) and then increment count only on success case. Change return type of _opp_add_static_v2() to return the pointer to the newly added OPP instead of an integer. This routine now returns a valid pointer if the OPP is really added, NULL for unsupported or duplicate OPPs, and error value cased as a pointer on errors. Ideally the fixes tag in this commit should point back to the commit that introduced OPP v2 initially, as that's where we started incorrectly accounting for duplicate OPPs: commit 274659029c9d ("PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings") But it wasn't a real problem until recently as the count was only used to check if any OPPs are added or not. And so this commit points to a rather recent commit where we added more code that depends on the value of "count". Fixes: 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper") Reported-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-10-03 16:13:15 +05:30
PM / OPP: _of_add_opp_table_v2(): increment count only if OPP is added Currently the _of_add_opp_table_v2 call loops through the OPP nodes in the operating-points-v2 table in the device tree and calls _opp_add_static_v2 for each to add them to the table. It counts each iteration through this loop as an added OPP, however there are cases where _opp_add_static_v2() returns 0 but no new OPP is added to the list. This can happen while adding duplicate OPP or if the OPP isn't supported by hardware. Because of this the count variable will contain the number of OPP nodes in the table in device tree but not necessarily the ones that are actually added. As this count value is what is checked to determine if there are any valid OPPs, if a platform has an operating-points-v2 table with all OPP nodes containing opp-supported-hw values that are not currently supported, then _of_add_opp_table_v2 will fail to abort as it should due to an empty table. Additionally, since commit 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper"), the same count variable is compared against the number of OPPs containing performance states and requires that either all or none have pstates set, however in the case of any opp table that has any entries that do not get added by _opp_add_static_v2 due to incompatible opp-supported-hw fields, these numbers will not match and _of_add_opp_table_v2 will incorrectly fail. We need to clearly identify all the three cases (success, failure, unsupported/duplicate OPPs) and then increment count only on success case. Change return type of _opp_add_static_v2() to return the pointer to the newly added OPP instead of an integer. This routine now returns a valid pointer if the OPP is really added, NULL for unsupported or duplicate OPPs, and error value cased as a pointer on errors. Ideally the fixes tag in this commit should point back to the commit that introduced OPP v2 initially, as that's where we started incorrectly accounting for duplicate OPPs: commit 274659029c9d ("PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings") But it wasn't a real problem until recently as the count was only used to check if any OPPs are added or not. And so this commit points to a rather recent commit where we added more code that depends on the value of "count". Fixes: 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper") Reported-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-10-03 16:13:15 +05:30
PM / OPP: _of_add_opp_table_v2(): increment count only if OPP is added Currently the _of_add_opp_table_v2 call loops through the OPP nodes in the operating-points-v2 table in the device tree and calls _opp_add_static_v2 for each to add them to the table. It counts each iteration through this loop as an added OPP, however there are cases where _opp_add_static_v2() returns 0 but no new OPP is added to the list. This can happen while adding duplicate OPP or if the OPP isn't supported by hardware. Because of this the count variable will contain the number of OPP nodes in the table in device tree but not necessarily the ones that are actually added. As this count value is what is checked to determine if there are any valid OPPs, if a platform has an operating-points-v2 table with all OPP nodes containing opp-supported-hw values that are not currently supported, then _of_add_opp_table_v2 will fail to abort as it should due to an empty table. Additionally, since commit 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper"), the same count variable is compared against the number of OPPs containing performance states and requires that either all or none have pstates set, however in the case of any opp table that has any entries that do not get added by _opp_add_static_v2 due to incompatible opp-supported-hw fields, these numbers will not match and _of_add_opp_table_v2 will incorrectly fail. We need to clearly identify all the three cases (success, failure, unsupported/duplicate OPPs) and then increment count only on success case. Change return type of _opp_add_static_v2() to return the pointer to the newly added OPP instead of an integer. This routine now returns a valid pointer if the OPP is really added, NULL for unsupported or duplicate OPPs, and error value cased as a pointer on errors. Ideally the fixes tag in this commit should point back to the commit that introduced OPP v2 initially, as that's where we started incorrectly accounting for duplicate OPPs: commit 274659029c9d ("PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings") But it wasn't a real problem until recently as the count was only used to check if any OPPs are added or not. And so this commit points to a rather recent commit where we added more code that depends on the value of "count". Fixes: 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper") Reported-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-10-03 16:13:15 +05:30
PM / OPP: _of_add_opp_table_v2(): increment count only if OPP is added Currently the _of_add_opp_table_v2 call loops through the OPP nodes in the operating-points-v2 table in the device tree and calls _opp_add_static_v2 for each to add them to the table. It counts each iteration through this loop as an added OPP, however there are cases where _opp_add_static_v2() returns 0 but no new OPP is added to the list. This can happen while adding duplicate OPP or if the OPP isn't supported by hardware. Because of this the count variable will contain the number of OPP nodes in the table in device tree but not necessarily the ones that are actually added. As this count value is what is checked to determine if there are any valid OPPs, if a platform has an operating-points-v2 table with all OPP nodes containing opp-supported-hw values that are not currently supported, then _of_add_opp_table_v2 will fail to abort as it should due to an empty table. Additionally, since commit 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper"), the same count variable is compared against the number of OPPs containing performance states and requires that either all or none have pstates set, however in the case of any opp table that has any entries that do not get added by _opp_add_static_v2 due to incompatible opp-supported-hw fields, these numbers will not match and _of_add_opp_table_v2 will incorrectly fail. We need to clearly identify all the three cases (success, failure, unsupported/duplicate OPPs) and then increment count only on success case. Change return type of _opp_add_static_v2() to return the pointer to the newly added OPP instead of an integer. This routine now returns a valid pointer if the OPP is really added, NULL for unsupported or duplicate OPPs, and error value cased as a pointer on errors. Ideally the fixes tag in this commit should point back to the commit that introduced OPP v2 initially, as that's where we started incorrectly accounting for duplicate OPPs: commit 274659029c9d ("PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings") But it wasn't a real problem until recently as the count was only used to check if any OPPs are added or not. And so this commit points to a rather recent commit where we added more code that depends on the value of "count". Fixes: 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper") Reported-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-10-03 16:13:15 +05:30
PM / OPP: _of_add_opp_table_v2(): increment count only if OPP is added Currently the _of_add_opp_table_v2 call loops through the OPP nodes in the operating-points-v2 table in the device tree and calls _opp_add_static_v2 for each to add them to the table. It counts each iteration through this loop as an added OPP, however there are cases where _opp_add_static_v2() returns 0 but no new OPP is added to the list. This can happen while adding duplicate OPP or if the OPP isn't supported by hardware. Because of this the count variable will contain the number of OPP nodes in the table in device tree but not necessarily the ones that are actually added. As this count value is what is checked to determine if there are any valid OPPs, if a platform has an operating-points-v2 table with all OPP nodes containing opp-supported-hw values that are not currently supported, then _of_add_opp_table_v2 will fail to abort as it should due to an empty table. Additionally, since commit 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper"), the same count variable is compared against the number of OPPs containing performance states and requires that either all or none have pstates set, however in the case of any opp table that has any entries that do not get added by _opp_add_static_v2 due to incompatible opp-supported-hw fields, these numbers will not match and _of_add_opp_table_v2 will incorrectly fail. We need to clearly identify all the three cases (success, failure, unsupported/duplicate OPPs) and then increment count only on success case. Change return type of _opp_add_static_v2() to return the pointer to the newly added OPP instead of an integer. This routine now returns a valid pointer if the OPP is really added, NULL for unsupported or duplicate OPPs, and error value cased as a pointer on errors. Ideally the fixes tag in this commit should point back to the commit that introduced OPP v2 initially, as that's where we started incorrectly accounting for duplicate OPPs: commit 274659029c9d ("PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings") But it wasn't a real problem until recently as the count was only used to check if any OPPs are added or not. And so this commit points to a rather recent commit where we added more code that depends on the value of "count". Fixes: 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper") Reported-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-10-03 16:13:15 +05:30
PM / OPP: _of_add_opp_table_v2(): increment count only if OPP is added Currently the _of_add_opp_table_v2 call loops through the OPP nodes in the operating-points-v2 table in the device tree and calls _opp_add_static_v2 for each to add them to the table. It counts each iteration through this loop as an added OPP, however there are cases where _opp_add_static_v2() returns 0 but no new OPP is added to the list. This can happen while adding duplicate OPP or if the OPP isn't supported by hardware. Because of this the count variable will contain the number of OPP nodes in the table in device tree but not necessarily the ones that are actually added. As this count value is what is checked to determine if there are any valid OPPs, if a platform has an operating-points-v2 table with all OPP nodes containing opp-supported-hw values that are not currently supported, then _of_add_opp_table_v2 will fail to abort as it should due to an empty table. Additionally, since commit 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper"), the same count variable is compared against the number of OPPs containing performance states and requires that either all or none have pstates set, however in the case of any opp table that has any entries that do not get added by _opp_add_static_v2 due to incompatible opp-supported-hw fields, these numbers will not match and _of_add_opp_table_v2 will incorrectly fail. We need to clearly identify all the three cases (success, failure, unsupported/duplicate OPPs) and then increment count only on success case. Change return type of _opp_add_static_v2() to return the pointer to the newly added OPP instead of an integer. This routine now returns a valid pointer if the OPP is really added, NULL for unsupported or duplicate OPPs, and error value cased as a pointer on errors. Ideally the fixes tag in this commit should point back to the commit that introduced OPP v2 initially, as that's where we started incorrectly accounting for duplicate OPPs: commit 274659029c9d ("PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings") But it wasn't a real problem until recently as the count was only used to check if any OPPs are added or not. And so this commit points to a rather recent commit where we added more code that depends on the value of "count". Fixes: 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper") Reported-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-10-03 16:13:15 +05:30
PM / OPP: _of_add_opp_table_v2(): increment count only if OPP is added Currently the _of_add_opp_table_v2 call loops through the OPP nodes in the operating-points-v2 table in the device tree and calls _opp_add_static_v2 for each to add them to the table. It counts each iteration through this loop as an added OPP, however there are cases where _opp_add_static_v2() returns 0 but no new OPP is added to the list. This can happen while adding duplicate OPP or if the OPP isn't supported by hardware. Because of this the count variable will contain the number of OPP nodes in the table in device tree but not necessarily the ones that are actually added. As this count value is what is checked to determine if there are any valid OPPs, if a platform has an operating-points-v2 table with all OPP nodes containing opp-supported-hw values that are not currently supported, then _of_add_opp_table_v2 will fail to abort as it should due to an empty table. Additionally, since commit 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper"), the same count variable is compared against the number of OPPs containing performance states and requires that either all or none have pstates set, however in the case of any opp table that has any entries that do not get added by _opp_add_static_v2 due to incompatible opp-supported-hw fields, these numbers will not match and _of_add_opp_table_v2 will incorrectly fail. We need to clearly identify all the three cases (success, failure, unsupported/duplicate OPPs) and then increment count only on success case. Change return type of _opp_add_static_v2() to return the pointer to the newly added OPP instead of an integer. This routine now returns a valid pointer if the OPP is really added, NULL for unsupported or duplicate OPPs, and error value cased as a pointer on errors. Ideally the fixes tag in this commit should point back to the commit that introduced OPP v2 initially, as that's where we started incorrectly accounting for duplicate OPPs: commit 274659029c9d ("PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings") But it wasn't a real problem until recently as the count was only used to check if any OPPs are added or not. And so this commit points to a rather recent commit where we added more code that depends on the value of "count". Fixes: 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper") Reported-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-10-03 16:13:15 +05:30
PM / OPP: _of_add_opp_table_v2(): increment count only if OPP is added Currently the _of_add_opp_table_v2 call loops through the OPP nodes in the operating-points-v2 table in the device tree and calls _opp_add_static_v2 for each to add them to the table. It counts each iteration through this loop as an added OPP, however there are cases where _opp_add_static_v2() returns 0 but no new OPP is added to the list. This can happen while adding duplicate OPP or if the OPP isn't supported by hardware. Because of this the count variable will contain the number of OPP nodes in the table in device tree but not necessarily the ones that are actually added. As this count value is what is checked to determine if there are any valid OPPs, if a platform has an operating-points-v2 table with all OPP nodes containing opp-supported-hw values that are not currently supported, then _of_add_opp_table_v2 will fail to abort as it should due to an empty table. Additionally, since commit 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper"), the same count variable is compared against the number of OPPs containing performance states and requires that either all or none have pstates set, however in the case of any opp table that has any entries that do not get added by _opp_add_static_v2 due to incompatible opp-supported-hw fields, these numbers will not match and _of_add_opp_table_v2 will incorrectly fail. We need to clearly identify all the three cases (success, failure, unsupported/duplicate OPPs) and then increment count only on success case. Change return type of _opp_add_static_v2() to return the pointer to the newly added OPP instead of an integer. This routine now returns a valid pointer if the OPP is really added, NULL for unsupported or duplicate OPPs, and error value cased as a pointer on errors. Ideally the fixes tag in this commit should point back to the commit that introduced OPP v2 initially, as that's where we started incorrectly accounting for duplicate OPPs: commit 274659029c9d ("PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings") But it wasn't a real problem until recently as the count was only used to check if any OPPs are added or not. And so this commit points to a rather recent commit where we added more code that depends on the value of "count". Fixes: 3ba98324e81a ("PM / OPP: Get performance state using genpd helper") Reported-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2018-10-03 16:13:15 +05:30
opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER The OPP core manages various resources, e.g. clocks or interconnect paths. These resources are looked up when the OPP table is allocated once dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called the first time (either directly or indirectly through one of the many helper functions). At this point, the resources may not be available yet, i.e. looking them up will result in -EPROBE_DEFER. Unfortunately, dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is currently unable to propagate this error code since it only returns the allocated OPP table or NULL. This means that all consumers of the OPP core are required to make sure that all necessary resources are available. Usually this happens by requesting them, checking the result and releasing them immediately after. For example, we have added "dev_pm_opp_of_find_icc_paths(dev, NULL)" to several drivers now just to make sure the interconnect providers are ready before the OPP table is allocated. If this call is missing, the OPP core will only warn about this and then attempt to continue without interconnect. This will eventually fail horribly, e.g.: cpu cpu0: _allocate_opp_table: Error finding interconnect paths: -517 ... later ... of: _read_bw: Mismatch between opp-peak-kBps and paths (1 0) cpu cpu0: _opp_add_static_v2: opp key field not found cpu cpu0: _of_add_opp_table_v2: Failed to add OPP, -22 This example happens when trying to use interconnects for a CPU OPP table together with qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c. qcom-cpufreq-nvmem calls dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(), which ends up allocating the OPP table early. To fix the problem with the current approach we would need to add yet another call to dev_pm_opp_of_find_icc_paths(dev, NULL). But actually qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c has nothing to do with interconnects... This commit attempts to make this more robust by allowing dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return an error pointer. Fixing all the usages is trivial because the function is usually used indirectly through another helper (e.g. dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw() above). These other helpers already return an error pointer. The example above then works correctly because set_supported_hw() will return -EPROBE_DEFER, and qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c already propagates that error. It should also be possible to remove the remaining usages of "dev_pm_opp_of_find_icc_paths(dev, NULL)" from other drivers as well. Note that this commit currently only handles -EPROBE_DEFER for the clock/interconnects within _allocate_opp_table(). Other errors are just ignored as before. Eventually those should be propagated as well. Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> [ Viresh: skip checking return value of dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() for EPROBE_DEFER in domain.c, fix NULL return value and reorder code a bit in core.c, and update exynos-asv.c ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2020-07-27 11:30:46 +02:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers The milli-Watts precision causes rounding errors while calculating efficiency cost for each OPP. This is especially visible in the 'simple' Energy Model (EM), where the power for each OPP is provided from OPP framework. This can cause some OPPs to be marked inefficient, while using micro-Watts precision that might not happen. Update all EM users which access 'power' field and assume the value is in milli-Watts. Solve also an issue with potential overflow in calculation of energy estimation on 32bit machine. It's needed now since the power value (thus the 'cost' as well) are higher. Example calculation which shows the rounding error and impact: power = 'dyn-power-coeff' * volt_mV * volt_mV * freq_MHz power_a_uW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^6 = 18000 power_a_mW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^9 = 18 power_b_uW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^6 = 21961 power_b_mW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^9 = 21 max_freq = 2000MHz cost_a_mW = 18 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72 cost_a_uW = 18000 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72000 cost_b_mW = 21 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 70 // <- artificially better cost_b_uW = 21961 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 73203 The 'cost_b_mW' (which is based on old milli-Watts) is misleadingly better that the 'cost_b_uW' (this patch uses micro-Watts) and such would have impact on the 'inefficient OPPs' information in the Cpufreq framework. This patch set removes the rounding issue. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-07 08:15:52 +01:00
PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers The milli-Watts precision causes rounding errors while calculating efficiency cost for each OPP. This is especially visible in the 'simple' Energy Model (EM), where the power for each OPP is provided from OPP framework. This can cause some OPPs to be marked inefficient, while using micro-Watts precision that might not happen. Update all EM users which access 'power' field and assume the value is in milli-Watts. Solve also an issue with potential overflow in calculation of energy estimation on 32bit machine. It's needed now since the power value (thus the 'cost' as well) are higher. Example calculation which shows the rounding error and impact: power = 'dyn-power-coeff' * volt_mV * volt_mV * freq_MHz power_a_uW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^6 = 18000 power_a_mW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^9 = 18 power_b_uW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^6 = 21961 power_b_mW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^9 = 21 max_freq = 2000MHz cost_a_mW = 18 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72 cost_a_uW = 18000 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72000 cost_b_mW = 21 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 70 // <- artificially better cost_b_uW = 21961 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 73203 The 'cost_b_mW' (which is based on old milli-Watts) is misleadingly better that the 'cost_b_uW' (this patch uses micro-Watts) and such would have impact on the 'inefficient OPPs' information in the Cpufreq framework. This patch set removes the rounding issue. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-07 08:15:52 +01:00
PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers The milli-Watts precision causes rounding errors while calculating efficiency cost for each OPP. This is especially visible in the 'simple' Energy Model (EM), where the power for each OPP is provided from OPP framework. This can cause some OPPs to be marked inefficient, while using micro-Watts precision that might not happen. Update all EM users which access 'power' field and assume the value is in milli-Watts. Solve also an issue with potential overflow in calculation of energy estimation on 32bit machine. It's needed now since the power value (thus the 'cost' as well) are higher. Example calculation which shows the rounding error and impact: power = 'dyn-power-coeff' * volt_mV * volt_mV * freq_MHz power_a_uW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^6 = 18000 power_a_mW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^9 = 18 power_b_uW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^6 = 21961 power_b_mW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^9 = 21 max_freq = 2000MHz cost_a_mW = 18 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72 cost_a_uW = 18000 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72000 cost_b_mW = 21 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 70 // <- artificially better cost_b_uW = 21961 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 73203 The 'cost_b_mW' (which is based on old milli-Watts) is misleadingly better that the 'cost_b_uW' (this patch uses micro-Watts) and such would have impact on the 'inefficient OPPs' information in the Cpufreq framework. This patch set removes the rounding issue. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-07 08:15:52 +01:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers The milli-Watts precision causes rounding errors while calculating efficiency cost for each OPP. This is especially visible in the 'simple' Energy Model (EM), where the power for each OPP is provided from OPP framework. This can cause some OPPs to be marked inefficient, while using micro-Watts precision that might not happen. Update all EM users which access 'power' field and assume the value is in milli-Watts. Solve also an issue with potential overflow in calculation of energy estimation on 32bit machine. It's needed now since the power value (thus the 'cost' as well) are higher. Example calculation which shows the rounding error and impact: power = 'dyn-power-coeff' * volt_mV * volt_mV * freq_MHz power_a_uW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^6 = 18000 power_a_mW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^9 = 18 power_b_uW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^6 = 21961 power_b_mW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^9 = 21 max_freq = 2000MHz cost_a_mW = 18 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72 cost_a_uW = 18000 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72000 cost_b_mW = 21 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 70 // <- artificially better cost_b_uW = 21961 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 73203 The 'cost_b_mW' (which is based on old milli-Watts) is misleadingly better that the 'cost_b_uW' (this patch uses micro-Watts) and such would have impact on the 'inefficient OPPs' information in the Cpufreq framework. This patch set removes the rounding issue. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-07 08:15:52 +01:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers The milli-Watts precision causes rounding errors while calculating efficiency cost for each OPP. This is especially visible in the 'simple' Energy Model (EM), where the power for each OPP is provided from OPP framework. This can cause some OPPs to be marked inefficient, while using micro-Watts precision that might not happen. Update all EM users which access 'power' field and assume the value is in milli-Watts. Solve also an issue with potential overflow in calculation of energy estimation on 32bit machine. It's needed now since the power value (thus the 'cost' as well) are higher. Example calculation which shows the rounding error and impact: power = 'dyn-power-coeff' * volt_mV * volt_mV * freq_MHz power_a_uW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^6 = 18000 power_a_mW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^9 = 18 power_b_uW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^6 = 21961 power_b_mW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^9 = 21 max_freq = 2000MHz cost_a_mW = 18 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72 cost_a_uW = 18000 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72000 cost_b_mW = 21 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 70 // <- artificially better cost_b_uW = 21961 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 73203 The 'cost_b_mW' (which is based on old milli-Watts) is misleadingly better that the 'cost_b_uW' (this patch uses micro-Watts) and such would have impact on the 'inefficient OPPs' information in the Cpufreq framework. This patch set removes the rounding issue. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-07 08:15:52 +01:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers The milli-Watts precision causes rounding errors while calculating efficiency cost for each OPP. This is especially visible in the 'simple' Energy Model (EM), where the power for each OPP is provided from OPP framework. This can cause some OPPs to be marked inefficient, while using micro-Watts precision that might not happen. Update all EM users which access 'power' field and assume the value is in milli-Watts. Solve also an issue with potential overflow in calculation of energy estimation on 32bit machine. It's needed now since the power value (thus the 'cost' as well) are higher. Example calculation which shows the rounding error and impact: power = 'dyn-power-coeff' * volt_mV * volt_mV * freq_MHz power_a_uW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^6 = 18000 power_a_mW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^9 = 18 power_b_uW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^6 = 21961 power_b_mW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^9 = 21 max_freq = 2000MHz cost_a_mW = 18 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72 cost_a_uW = 18000 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72000 cost_b_mW = 21 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 70 // <- artificially better cost_b_uW = 21961 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 73203 The 'cost_b_mW' (which is based on old milli-Watts) is misleadingly better that the 'cost_b_uW' (this patch uses micro-Watts) and such would have impact on the 'inefficient OPPs' information in the Cpufreq framework. This patch set removes the rounding issue. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-07 08:15:52 +01:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers The milli-Watts precision causes rounding errors while calculating efficiency cost for each OPP. This is especially visible in the 'simple' Energy Model (EM), where the power for each OPP is provided from OPP framework. This can cause some OPPs to be marked inefficient, while using micro-Watts precision that might not happen. Update all EM users which access 'power' field and assume the value is in milli-Watts. Solve also an issue with potential overflow in calculation of energy estimation on 32bit machine. It's needed now since the power value (thus the 'cost' as well) are higher. Example calculation which shows the rounding error and impact: power = 'dyn-power-coeff' * volt_mV * volt_mV * freq_MHz power_a_uW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^6 = 18000 power_a_mW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^9 = 18 power_b_uW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^6 = 21961 power_b_mW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^9 = 21 max_freq = 2000MHz cost_a_mW = 18 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72 cost_a_uW = 18000 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72000 cost_b_mW = 21 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 70 // <- artificially better cost_b_uW = 21961 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 73203 The 'cost_b_mW' (which is based on old milli-Watts) is misleadingly better that the 'cost_b_uW' (this patch uses micro-Watts) and such would have impact on the 'inefficient OPPs' information in the Cpufreq framework. This patch set removes the rounding issue. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-07 08:15:52 +01:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00
PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to let drivers register the active power of CPUs. The drivers are expected to provide a callback method which estimates the power consumed by a CPU at each available performance levels. How exactly this should be implemented, however, depends on the platform. On some systems, PM_OPP knows the voltage and frequency at which CPUs can run. When coupled with the CPU 'capacitance' (as provided by the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' devicetree binding), it is possible to estimate the dynamic power consumption of a CPU as P = C * V^2 * f, with C its capacitance and V and f respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP. The Intelligent Power Allocator (IPA) thermal governor already implements that estimation method, in the thermal framework. However, this power estimation method can be applied to any platform where all the parameters are known (C, V and f), and not only those suffering thermal issues. As such, the code implementing this feature can be re-used to also populate the EM framework now used by EAS. As a first step, introduce in PM_OPP a helper function which CPUFreq drivers can use to register into the EM framework. This duplicates the power estimation done in IPA until it can be migrated to using the EM framework. This will be done later, once the EM framework has support for at least all platforms currently supported by IPA. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-04 11:09:48 +00:00