linux/drivers/of/fdt.c

1286 lines
32 KiB

of: fdt: Demote kernel-doc abuses and fix function naming Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:525: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_check_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: expecting prototype for fdt_scan_reserved_mem(). Prototype was for __fdt_scan_reserved_mem() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:663: warning: Function parameter or member 'parent' not described in 'of_scan_flat_dt_subnodes' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'name' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'size' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'compat' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_phandle' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: expecting prototype for of_get_flat_dt_prop(). Prototype was for of_get_flat_dt_phandle() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318104036.3175910-8-lee.jones@linaro.org
2021-03-18 10:40:33 +00:00
of: fdt: Demote kernel-doc abuses and fix function naming Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:525: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_check_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: expecting prototype for fdt_scan_reserved_mem(). Prototype was for __fdt_scan_reserved_mem() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:663: warning: Function parameter or member 'parent' not described in 'of_scan_flat_dt_subnodes' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'name' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'size' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'compat' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_phandle' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: expecting prototype for of_get_flat_dt_prop(). Prototype was for of_get_flat_dt_phandle() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318104036.3175910-8-lee.jones@linaro.org
2021-03-18 10:40:33 +00:00
of: fdt: Demote kernel-doc abuses and fix function naming Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:525: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_check_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: expecting prototype for fdt_scan_reserved_mem(). Prototype was for __fdt_scan_reserved_mem() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:663: warning: Function parameter or member 'parent' not described in 'of_scan_flat_dt_subnodes' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'name' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'size' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'compat' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_phandle' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: expecting prototype for of_get_flat_dt_prop(). Prototype was for of_get_flat_dt_phandle() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318104036.3175910-8-lee.jones@linaro.org
2021-03-18 10:40:33 +00:00
of: fdt: Demote kernel-doc abuses and fix function naming Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:525: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_check_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: expecting prototype for fdt_scan_reserved_mem(). Prototype was for __fdt_scan_reserved_mem() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:663: warning: Function parameter or member 'parent' not described in 'of_scan_flat_dt_subnodes' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'name' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'size' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'compat' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_phandle' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: expecting prototype for of_get_flat_dt_prop(). Prototype was for of_get_flat_dt_phandle() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318104036.3175910-8-lee.jones@linaro.org
2021-03-18 10:40:33 +00:00
of: fdt: Demote kernel-doc abuses and fix function naming Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:525: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_check_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: expecting prototype for fdt_scan_reserved_mem(). Prototype was for __fdt_scan_reserved_mem() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:663: warning: Function parameter or member 'parent' not described in 'of_scan_flat_dt_subnodes' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'name' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'size' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'compat' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_phandle' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: expecting prototype for of_get_flat_dt_prop(). Prototype was for of_get_flat_dt_phandle() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318104036.3175910-8-lee.jones@linaro.org
2021-03-18 10:40:33 +00:00
riscv: Use PUD/P4D/PGD pages for the linear mapping During the early page table creation, we used to set the mapping for PAGE_OFFSET to the kernel load address: but the kernel load address is always offseted by PMD_SIZE which makes it impossible to use PUD/P4D/PGD pages as this physical address is not aligned on PUD/P4D/PGD size (whereas PAGE_OFFSET is). But actually we don't have to establish this mapping (ie set va_pa_offset) that early in the boot process because: - first, setup_vm installs a temporary kernel mapping and among other things, discovers the system memory, - then, setup_vm_final creates the final kernel mapping and takes advantage of the discovered system memory to create the linear mapping. During the first phase, we don't know the start of the system memory and then until the second phase is finished, we can't use the linear mapping at all and phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys translations must not be used because it would result in a different translation from the 'real' one once the final mapping is installed. So here we simply delay the initialization of va_pa_offset to after the system memory discovery. But to make sure noone uses the linear mapping before, we add some guard in the DEBUG_VIRTUAL config. Finally we can use PUD/P4D/PGD hugepages when possible, which will result in a better TLB utilization. Note that: - this does not apply to rv32 as the kernel mapping lies in the linear mapping. - we rely on the firmware to protect itself using PMP. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> # DT bits Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Tested-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324155421.271544-4-alexghiti@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2023-03-24 16:54:21 +01:00
riscv: Use PUD/P4D/PGD pages for the linear mapping During the early page table creation, we used to set the mapping for PAGE_OFFSET to the kernel load address: but the kernel load address is always offseted by PMD_SIZE which makes it impossible to use PUD/P4D/PGD pages as this physical address is not aligned on PUD/P4D/PGD size (whereas PAGE_OFFSET is). But actually we don't have to establish this mapping (ie set va_pa_offset) that early in the boot process because: - first, setup_vm installs a temporary kernel mapping and among other things, discovers the system memory, - then, setup_vm_final creates the final kernel mapping and takes advantage of the discovered system memory to create the linear mapping. During the first phase, we don't know the start of the system memory and then until the second phase is finished, we can't use the linear mapping at all and phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys translations must not be used because it would result in a different translation from the 'real' one once the final mapping is installed. So here we simply delay the initialization of va_pa_offset to after the system memory discovery. But to make sure noone uses the linear mapping before, we add some guard in the DEBUG_VIRTUAL config. Finally we can use PUD/P4D/PGD hugepages when possible, which will result in a better TLB utilization. Note that: - this does not apply to rv32 as the kernel mapping lies in the linear mapping. - we rely on the firmware to protect itself using PMP. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> # DT bits Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Tested-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324155421.271544-4-alexghiti@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2023-03-24 16:54:21 +01:00
of/fdt: Don't calculate initrd size from DT if start > end If the properties 'linux,initrd-start' and 'linux,initrd-end' of the chosen node populated from the bootloader, eg. U-Boot, are so that start > end, then the phys_initrd_size calculated from end - start is negative that subsequently gets converted to a high positive value for being unsigned long long. Then, the memory region with the (invalid) size is added to the bootmem and attempted being paged in paging_init() that results in the kernel fault. For example, on the FVP ARM64 system I'm running, the U-Boot populates the 'linux,initrd-start' with 8800_0000 and 'linux,initrd-end' with 0. The phys_initrd_size calculated is then ffff_ffff_7800_0000 (= 0 - 8800_0000 = -8800_0000 + ULLONG_MAX + 1). paging_init() then attempts to map the address 8800_0000 + ffff_ffff_7800_0000 and oops'es as below. It should be stressed, it is generally a fault of the bootloader's with the kernel relying on it, however we should not allow the bootloader's misconfiguration to lead to the kernel oops. Not only the kernel should be bullet proof against it but also finding the root cause of the paging fault spanning over the bootloader, DT, and kernel may happen is not so easy. Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffefe43c000 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x96000007 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007 CM = 0, WnR = 0 swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000080e3d000 [fffffffefe43c000] pgd=0000000080de9003, pud=0000000080de9003 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffff8000de9f90 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x96000005 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005 CM = 0, WnR = 0 swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000080e3d000 [ffffff8000de9f90] pgd=0000000000000000, pud=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 96000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.4.51-yocto-standard #1 Hardware name: FVP Base (DT) pstate: 60000085 (nZCv daIf -PAN -UAO) pc : show_pte+0x12c/0x1b4 lr : show_pte+0x100/0x1b4 sp : ffffffc010ce3b30 x29: ffffffc010ce3b30 x28: ffffffc010ceed80 x27: fffffffefe43c000 x26: fffffffefe43a028 x25: 0000000080bf0000 x24: 0000000000000025 x23: ffffffc010b8d000 x22: ffffffc010e3d000 x23: ffffffc010b8d000 x22: ffffffc010e3d000 x21: 0000000080de9000 x20: ffffff7f80000f90 x19: fffffffefe43c000 x18: 0000000000000030 x17: 0000000000001400 x16: 0000000000001c00 x15: ffffffc010cef1b8 x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: ffffffc010df1f40 x12: ffffffc010df1b70 x11: ffffffc010ce3b30 x10: ffffffc010ce3b30 x9 : 00000000ffffffc8 x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 000000000000000f x6 : ffffffc010df16e8 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 00000000ffffffff x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000008080000000 x0 : ffffffc010af1d68 Call trace: show_pte+0x12c/0x1b4 die_kernel_fault+0x54/0x78 __do_kernel_fault+0x11c/0x128 do_translation_fault+0x58/0xac do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0 el1_da+0x1c/0x90 __create_pgd_mapping+0x348/0x598 paging_init+0x3f0/0x70d0 setup_arch+0x2c0/0x5d4 start_kernel+0x94/0x49c Code: 92748eb5 900052a0 9135a000 cb010294 (f8756a96)  Signed-off-by: Marek Bykowski <marek.bykowski@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220909023358.76881-1-marek.bykowski@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
2022-09-09 02:33:57 +00:00
efi: apply memblock cap after memblock_add() On arm64, during kdump kernel saves vmcore, it runs into the following bug: ... [ 15.148919] usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'kmem_cache_node' (offset 0, size 4096)! [ 15.159707] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 15.164311] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:99! [ 15.168482] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP [ 15.173261] Modules linked in: xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce sbsa_gwdt ast i2c_algo_bit drm_vram_helper drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm_ttm_helper ttm drm nvme nvme_core xgene_hwmon i2c_designware_platform i2c_designware_core dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod overlay squashfs zstd_decompress loop [ 15.206186] CPU: 0 PID: 542 Comm: cp Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4 #1 [ 15.212006] Hardware name: GIGABYTE R272-P30-JG/MP32-AR0-JG, BIOS F12 (SCP: 1.5.20210426) 05/13/2021 [ 15.221125] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 15.228073] pc : usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0 [ 15.232074] lr : usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0 [ 15.236070] sp : ffff8000121abba0 [ 15.239371] x29: ffff8000121abbb0 x28: 0000000000003000 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 15.246494] x26: 0000000080000400 x25: 0000ffff885c7000 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 15.253617] x23: 000007ff80400000 x22: ffff07ff80401000 x21: 0000000000000001 [ 15.260739] x20: 0000000000001000 x19: ffff07ff80400000 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 15.267861] x17: 656a626f2042554c x16: 53206d6f72662064 x15: 6574636574656420 [ 15.274983] x14: 74706d6574746120 x13: 2129363930342065 x12: 7a6973202c302074 [ 15.282105] x11: ffffc8b041d1b148 x10: 00000000ffff8000 x9 : ffffc8b04012812c [ 15.289228] x8 : 00000000ffff7fff x7 : ffffc8b041d1b148 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 15.296349] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000007fff x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 15.303471] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff07ff8c064800 x0 : 000000000000006b [ 15.310593] Call trace: [ 15.313027] usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0 [ 15.316677] __check_heap_object+0xd4/0xf0 [ 15.320762] __check_object_size.part.0+0x160/0x1e0 [ 15.325628] __check_object_size+0x2c/0x40 [ 15.329711] copy_oldmem_page+0x7c/0x140 [ 15.333623] read_from_oldmem.part.0+0xfc/0x1c0 [ 15.338142] __read_vmcore.constprop.0+0x23c/0x350 [ 15.342920] read_vmcore+0x28/0x34 [ 15.346309] proc_reg_read+0xb4/0xf0 [ 15.349871] vfs_read+0xb8/0x1f0 [ 15.353088] ksys_read+0x74/0x100 [ 15.356390] __arm64_sys_read+0x28/0x34 ... This bug introduced by commit b261dba2fdb2 ("arm64: kdump: Remove custom linux,usable-memory-range handling"), which moves memblock_cap_memory_range() to fdt, but it breaches the rules that memblock_cap_memory_range() should come after memblock_add() etc as said in commit e888fa7bb882 ("memblock: Check memory add/cap ordering"). As a consequence, the virtual address set up by copy_oldmem_page() does not bail out from the test of virt_addr_valid() in check_heap_object(), and finally hits the BUG_ON(). Since memblock allocator has no idea about when the memblock is fully populated, while efi_init() is aware, so tackling this issue by calling the interface early_init_dt_check_for_usable_mem_range() exposed by of/fdt. Fixes: b261dba2fdb2 ("arm64: kdump: Remove custom linux,usable-memory-range handling") Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org To: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211215021348.8766-1-kernelfans@gmail.com
2021-12-15 10:13:48 +08:00
of: fdt: Demote kernel-doc abuses and fix function naming Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:525: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_check_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: expecting prototype for fdt_scan_reserved_mem(). Prototype was for __fdt_scan_reserved_mem() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:663: warning: Function parameter or member 'parent' not described in 'of_scan_flat_dt_subnodes' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'name' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'size' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'compat' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_phandle' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: expecting prototype for of_get_flat_dt_prop(). Prototype was for of_get_flat_dt_phandle() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318104036.3175910-8-lee.jones@linaro.org
2021-03-18 10:40:33 +00:00
of: fdt: Demote kernel-doc abuses and fix function naming Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:478: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__reserved_mem_reserve_reg' drivers/of/fdt.c:525: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__reserved_mem_check_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in '__fdt_scan_reserved_mem' drivers/of/fdt.c:547: warning: expecting prototype for fdt_scan_reserved_mem(). Prototype was for __fdt_scan_reserved_mem() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:663: warning: Function parameter or member 'parent' not described in 'of_scan_flat_dt_subnodes' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'name' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:708: warning: Function parameter or member 'size' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:758: warning: Function parameter or member 'compat' not described in 'of_flat_dt_match' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'of_get_flat_dt_phandle' drivers/of/fdt.c:778: warning: expecting prototype for of_get_flat_dt_prop(). Prototype was for of_get_flat_dt_phandle() instead drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:955: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_root' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'node' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'uname' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'depth' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' drivers/of/fdt.c:991: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'early_init_dt_scan_memory' Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318104036.3175910-8-lee.jones@linaro.org
2021-03-18 10:40:33 +00:00
of/fdt: Ignore disabled memory nodes When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still be added as a memblock. This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only memory: =================== secram@e000000 { secure-status = "okay"; status = "disabled"; reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>; device_type = "memory"; }; =================== The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an SError: =================== [ 0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 #524 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340 [ 0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340 [ 0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10 .... ================== The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range. As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory that is meant for non-secure code to use. That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on to the kernel, which will see the secram node. This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as firmware, then booting with the "booti" command. When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we are safe. EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn about memory, so we got lucky there. [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table) [2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063 [3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
2022-05-17 11:14:10 +01:00
treewide: add checks for the return value of memblock_alloc*() Add check for the return value of memblock_alloc*() functions and call panic() in case of error. The panic message repeats the one used by panicing memblock allocators with adjustment of parameters to include only relevant ones. The replacement was mostly automated with semantic patches like the one below with manual massaging of format strings. @@ expression ptr, size, align; @@ ptr = memblock_alloc(size, align); + if (!ptr) + panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx\n", __func__, size, align); [anders.roxell@linaro.org: use '%pa' with 'phys_addr_t' type] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190131161046.21886-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org [rppt@linux.ibm.com: fix format strings for panics after memblock_alloc] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1548950940-15145-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com [rppt@linux.ibm.com: don't panic if the allocation in sparse_buffer_init fails] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190131074018.GD28876@rapoport-lnx [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix xtensa printk warning] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1548057848-15136-20-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com> [c-sky] Acked-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> [MIPS] Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> [s390] Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> [Xen] Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> [m68k] Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> [xtensa] Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-11 23:30:31 -07:00
of: reserved_mem: Restructure how the reserved memory regions are processed [ Upstream commit 8a6e02d0c00e7b62e6acb74146878bb91e9e7e31 ] Reserved memory regions defined in the devicetree can be broken up into two groups: i) Statically-placed reserved memory regions i.e. regions defined with a static start address and size using the "reg" property. ii) Dynamically-placed reserved memory regions. i.e. regions defined by specifying an address range where they can be placed in memory using the "alloc_ranges" and "size" properties. These regions are processed and set aside at boot time. This is done in two stages as seen below: Stage 1: At this stage, fdt_scan_reserved_mem() scans through the child nodes of the reserved_memory node using the flattened devicetree and does the following: 1) If the node represents a statically-placed reserved memory region, i.e. if it is defined using the "reg" property: - Call memblock_reserve() or memblock_mark_nomap() as needed. - Add the information for that region into the reserved_mem array using fdt_reserved_mem_save_node(). i.e. fdt_reserved_mem_save_node(node, name, base, size). 2) If the node represents a dynamically-placed reserved memory region, i.e. if it is defined using "alloc-ranges" and "size" properties: - Add the information for that region to the reserved_mem array with the starting address and size set to 0. i.e. fdt_reserved_mem_save_node(node, name, 0, 0). Note: This region is saved to the array with a starting address of 0 because a starting address is not yet allocated for it. Stage 2: After iterating through all the reserved memory nodes and storing their relevant information in the reserved_mem array,fdt_init_reserved_mem() is called and does the following: 1) For statically-placed reserved memory regions: - Call the region specific init function using __reserved_mem_init_node(). 2) For dynamically-placed reserved memory regions: - Call __reserved_mem_alloc_size() which is used to allocate memory for each of these regions, and mark them as nomap if they have the nomap property specified in the DT. - Call the region specific init function. The current size of the resvered_mem array is 64 as is defined by MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS. This means that there is a limitation of 64 for how many reserved memory regions can be specified on a system. As systems continue to grow more and more complex, the number of reserved memory regions needed are also growing and are starting to hit this 64 count limit, hence the need to make the reserved_mem array dynamically sized (i.e. dynamically allocating memory for the reserved_mem array using membock_alloc_*). On architectures such as arm64, memory allocated using memblock is writable only after the page tables have been setup. This means that if the reserved_mem array is going to be dynamically allocated, it needs to happen after the page tables have been setup, not before. Since the reserved memory regions are currently being processed and added to the array before the page tables are setup, there is a need to change the order in which some of the processing is done to allow for the reserved_mem array to be dynamically sized. It is possible to process the statically-placed reserved memory regions without needing to store them in the reserved_mem array until after the page tables have been setup because all the information stored in the array is readily available in the devicetree and can be referenced at any time. Dynamically-placed reserved memory regions on the other hand get assigned a start address only at runtime, and hence need a place to be stored once they are allocated since there is no other referrence to the start address for these regions. Hence this patch changes the processing order of the reserved memory regions in the following ways: Step 1: fdt_scan_reserved_mem() scans through the child nodes of the reserved_memory node using the flattened devicetree and does the following: 1) If the node represents a statically-placed reserved memory region, i.e. if it is defined using the "reg" property: - Call memblock_reserve() or memblock_mark_nomap() as needed. 2) If the node represents a dynamically-placed reserved memory region, i.e. if it is defined using "alloc-ranges" and "size" properties: - Call __reserved_mem_alloc_size() which will: i) Allocate memory for the reserved region and call memblock_mark_nomap() as needed. ii) Call the region specific initialization function using fdt_init_reserved_mem_node(). iii) Save the region information in the reserved_mem array using fdt_reserved_mem_save_node(). Step 2: 1) This stage of the reserved memory processing is now only used to add the statically-placed reserved memory regions into the reserved_mem array using fdt_scan_reserved_mem_reg_nodes(), as well as call their region specific initialization functions. 2) This step has also been moved to be after the page tables are setup. Moving this will allow us to replace the reserved_mem array with a dynamically sized array before storing the rest of these regions. Signed-off-by: Oreoluwa Babatunde <quic_obabatun@quicinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008220624.551309-2-quic_obabatun@quicinc.com Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: 14bce187d160 ("of/fdt: Restore possibility to use both ACPI and FDT from bootloader") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-10-08 15:06:23 -07:00
of/fdt: Restore possibility to use both ACPI and FDT from bootloader [ Upstream commit 14bce187d1600710623d81888da3501bbc470ba2 ] There are cases when the bootloader provides information to the kernel in both ACPI and DTB, not interchangeably. One such use case is virtual machines in Android. When running on x86, the Android Virtualization Framework (AVF) boots VMs with ACPI like it is usually done on x86 (i.e. the virtual LAPIC, IOAPIC, HPET, PCI MMCONFIG etc are described in ACPI) but also passes various AVF-specific boot parameters in DTB. This allows reusing the same implementations of various AVF components on both arm64 and x86. Commit 7b937cc243e5 ("of: Create of_root if no dtb provided by firmware") removed the possibility to do that, since among other things it introduced forcing emptying the bootloader-provided DTB if ACPI is enabled (probably assuming that if ACPI is available, a DTB can only be useful for applying overlays to it afterwards, for testing purposes). So restore this possibility. Instead of completely preventing using ACPI and DT together, rely on arch-specific setup code to prevent using both to set up the same things (see various acpi_disabled checks under arch/). Fixes: 7b937cc243e5 ("of: Create of_root if no dtb provided by firmware") Signed-off-by: Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250105172741.3476758-3-dmaluka@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-01-05 17:27:41 +00:00