linux/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c

2780 lines
69 KiB

x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
dm: report suspended device during destroy The function dm_suspended returns true if the target is suspended. However, when the target is being suspended during unload, it returns false. An example where this is a problem: the test "!dm_suspended(wc->ti)" in writecache_writeback is not sufficient, because dm_suspended returns zero while writecache_suspend is in progress. As is, without an enhanced dm_suspended, simply switching from flush_workqueue to drain_workqueue still emits warnings: workqueue writecache-writeback: drain_workqueue() isn't complete after 10 tries workqueue writecache-writeback: drain_workqueue() isn't complete after 100 tries workqueue writecache-writeback: drain_workqueue() isn't complete after 200 tries workqueue writecache-writeback: drain_workqueue() isn't complete after 300 tries workqueue writecache-writeback: drain_workqueue() isn't complete after 400 tries writecache_suspend calls flush_workqueue(wc->writeback_wq) - this function flushes the current work. However, the workqueue may re-queue itself and flush_workqueue doesn't wait for re-queued works to finish. Because of this - the function writecache_writeback continues execution after the device was suspended and then concurrently with writecache_dtr, causing a crash in writecache_writeback. We must use drain_workqueue - that waits until the work and all re-queued works finish. As a prereq for switching to drain_workqueue, this commit fixes dm_suspended to return true after the presuspend hook and before the postsuspend hook - just like during a normal suspend. It allows simplifying the dm-integrity and dm-writecache targets so that they don't have to maintain suspended flags on their own. With this change use of drain_workqueue() can be used effectively. This change was tested with the lvm2 testsuite and cryptsetup testsuite and the are no regressions. Fixes: 48debafe4f2f ("dm: add writecache target") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.18+ Reported-by: Corey Marthaler <cmarthal@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2020-02-24 10:20:28 +01:00
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1] (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], remove all remaining needless uses with the following script: git grep '\buninitialized_var\b' | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | \ xargs perl -pi -e \ 's/\buninitialized_var\(([^\)]+)\)/\1/g; s:\s*/\* (GCC be quiet|to make compiler happy) \*/$::g;' drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c was manually tweaked to avoid pathological white-space. No outstanding warnings were found building allmodconfig with GCC 9.3.0 for x86_64, i386, arm64, arm, powerpc, powerpc64le, s390x, mips, sparc64, alpha, and m68k. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/ Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # drivers/infiniband and mlx4/mlx5 Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> # IB Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> # wireless drivers Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> # erofs Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2020-06-03 13:09:38 -07:00
dm writecache: optimize performance by sorting the blocks for writeback_all During the process of writeback, the blocks, which have been placed in wbl.list for writeback soon, are partially ordered for the contiguous ones. When writeback_all has been set, for most cases, also by default, there will be a lot of blocks in pmem need to writeback at the same time. For this case, we could optimize the performance by sorting all blocks in wbl.list. writecache_writeback doesn't need to get blocks from the tail of wc->lru, whereas from the first rb_node from the rb_tree. The benefit is that, writecache_writeback doesn't need to have any cost to sort the blocks, because of all blocks are incremental originally in rb_tree. There will be a writecache_flush when writeback_all begins to work, that will eliminate duplicate blocks in cache by committed/uncommitted. Testing platform: Thinksystem SR630 with persistent memory. The cache comes from pmem, which has 1006MB size. The origin device is HDD, 2GB of which for using. Testing steps: 1) dmsetup create mycache --table '0 4194304 writecache p /dev/sdb1 /dev/pmem4 4096 0' 2) fio -filename=/dev/mapper/mycache -direct=1 -iodepth=20 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -loops=1 -size=2g -group_reporting -name=mytest1 3) time dmsetup message /dev/mapper/mycache 0 flush Here is the results below, With the patch: # fio -filename=/dev/mapper/mycache -direct=1 -iodepth=20 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -loops=1 -size=2g -group_reporting -name=mytest1 iops : min= 1582, max=199470, avg=5305.94, stdev=21273.44, samples=197 # time dmsetup message /dev/mapper/mycache 0 flush real 0m44.020s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.003s Without the patch: # fio -filename=/dev/mapper/mycache -direct=1 -iodepth=20 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -loops=1 -size=2g -group_reporting -name=mytest1 iops : min= 1202, max=197650, avg=4968.67, stdev=20480.17, samples=211 # time dmsetup message /dev/mapper/mycache 0 flush real 1m39.221s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s I also have checked the data accuracy with this patch by making EXT4 filesystem on mycache, then mount it for checking md5 of files on that. The test result is positive, with this patch it could save more than half of time when writeback_all. Signed-off-by: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@lenovo.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2019-08-25 15:24:33 +08:00
dm writecache: optimize performance by sorting the blocks for writeback_all During the process of writeback, the blocks, which have been placed in wbl.list for writeback soon, are partially ordered for the contiguous ones. When writeback_all has been set, for most cases, also by default, there will be a lot of blocks in pmem need to writeback at the same time. For this case, we could optimize the performance by sorting all blocks in wbl.list. writecache_writeback doesn't need to get blocks from the tail of wc->lru, whereas from the first rb_node from the rb_tree. The benefit is that, writecache_writeback doesn't need to have any cost to sort the blocks, because of all blocks are incremental originally in rb_tree. There will be a writecache_flush when writeback_all begins to work, that will eliminate duplicate blocks in cache by committed/uncommitted. Testing platform: Thinksystem SR630 with persistent memory. The cache comes from pmem, which has 1006MB size. The origin device is HDD, 2GB of which for using. Testing steps: 1) dmsetup create mycache --table '0 4194304 writecache p /dev/sdb1 /dev/pmem4 4096 0' 2) fio -filename=/dev/mapper/mycache -direct=1 -iodepth=20 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -loops=1 -size=2g -group_reporting -name=mytest1 3) time dmsetup message /dev/mapper/mycache 0 flush Here is the results below, With the patch: # fio -filename=/dev/mapper/mycache -direct=1 -iodepth=20 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -loops=1 -size=2g -group_reporting -name=mytest1 iops : min= 1582, max=199470, avg=5305.94, stdev=21273.44, samples=197 # time dmsetup message /dev/mapper/mycache 0 flush real 0m44.020s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.003s Without the patch: # fio -filename=/dev/mapper/mycache -direct=1 -iodepth=20 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -loops=1 -size=2g -group_reporting -name=mytest1 iops : min= 1202, max=197650, avg=4968.67, stdev=20480.17, samples=211 # time dmsetup message /dev/mapper/mycache 0 flush real 1m39.221s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s I also have checked the data accuracy with this patch by making EXT4 filesystem on mycache, then mount it for checking md5 of files on that. The test result is positive, with this patch it could save more than half of time when writeback_all. Signed-off-by: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@lenovo.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2019-08-25 15:24:33 +08:00
dm writecache: optimize performance by sorting the blocks for writeback_all During the process of writeback, the blocks, which have been placed in wbl.list for writeback soon, are partially ordered for the contiguous ones. When writeback_all has been set, for most cases, also by default, there will be a lot of blocks in pmem need to writeback at the same time. For this case, we could optimize the performance by sorting all blocks in wbl.list. writecache_writeback doesn't need to get blocks from the tail of wc->lru, whereas from the first rb_node from the rb_tree. The benefit is that, writecache_writeback doesn't need to have any cost to sort the blocks, because of all blocks are incremental originally in rb_tree. There will be a writecache_flush when writeback_all begins to work, that will eliminate duplicate blocks in cache by committed/uncommitted. Testing platform: Thinksystem SR630 with persistent memory. The cache comes from pmem, which has 1006MB size. The origin device is HDD, 2GB of which for using. Testing steps: 1) dmsetup create mycache --table '0 4194304 writecache p /dev/sdb1 /dev/pmem4 4096 0' 2) fio -filename=/dev/mapper/mycache -direct=1 -iodepth=20 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -loops=1 -size=2g -group_reporting -name=mytest1 3) time dmsetup message /dev/mapper/mycache 0 flush Here is the results below, With the patch: # fio -filename=/dev/mapper/mycache -direct=1 -iodepth=20 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -loops=1 -size=2g -group_reporting -name=mytest1 iops : min= 1582, max=199470, avg=5305.94, stdev=21273.44, samples=197 # time dmsetup message /dev/mapper/mycache 0 flush real 0m44.020s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.003s Without the patch: # fio -filename=/dev/mapper/mycache -direct=1 -iodepth=20 -rw=randwrite -ioengine=libaio -bs=4k -loops=1 -size=2g -group_reporting -name=mytest1 iops : min= 1202, max=197650, avg=4968.67, stdev=20480.17, samples=211 # time dmsetup message /dev/mapper/mycache 0 flush real 1m39.221s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.003s I also have checked the data accuracy with this patch by making EXT4 filesystem on mycache, then mount it for checking md5 of files on that. The test result is positive, with this patch it could save more than half of time when writeback_all. Signed-off-by: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@lenovo.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2019-08-25 15:24:33 +08:00
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}() In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-10-05 20:40:16 -07:00
2021-07-12 17:49:03 -07:00