linux

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

lib: overflow: update reference to kunit-tool Replace URL with an updated path to the full Documentation page Signed-off-by: Tales Aparecida <tales.aparecida@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

2022-08-21 23:26:45 -03:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

overflow: Refactor test skips for Clang-specific issues Convert test exclusion into test skipping. This brings the logic for why a test is being skipped into the test itself, instead of having to spread ifdefs around the code. This will make cleanup easier as minimum tests get raised. Drop __maybe_unused so missed tests will be noticed again and clean up whitespace. For example, clang-11 on i386: [15:52:32] ================== overflow (18 subtests) ================== [15:52:32] [PASSED] u8_u8__u8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] s8_s8__s8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u16_u16__u16_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] s16_s16__s16_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u32_u32__u32_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] s32_s32__s32_overflow_test [15:52:32] [SKIPPED] u64_u64__u64_overflow_test [15:52:32] [SKIPPED] s64_s64__s64_overflow_test [15:52:32] [SKIPPED] u32_u32__int_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u32_u32__u8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u8_u8__int_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] int_int__u8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_sane_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_truncate_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_nonsense_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] overflow_allocation_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] overflow_size_helpers_test [15:52:32] ==================== [PASSED] overflow ===================== [15:52:32] ============================================================ [15:52:32] Testing complete. Ran 18 tests: passed: 15, skipped: 3 Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006230017.1833458-1-keescook@chromium.org

2022-10-06 16:00:17 -07:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

lib: overflow: Do not define 64-bit tests on 32-bit The 64-bit overflow tests will trigger 64-bit division on 32-bit hosts, which is not currently used anywhere in the kernel, and tickles bugs in at least Clang 13 and earlier: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1636 In reality, there shouldn't be a reason to not build the 64-bit test cases on 32-bit systems, so these #ifdefs can be removed once the minimum Clang version reaches 13. In the meantime, silence W=1 warnings given by the current code: ../lib/overflow_kunit.c:191:19: warning: 's64_tests' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 191 | DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(s64) = { | ^~~ ../lib/overflow_kunit.c:24:11: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY' 24 | } t ## _tests[] | ^ ../lib/overflow_kunit.c:94:19: warning: 'u64_tests' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 94 | DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY(u64) = { | ^~~ ../lib/overflow_kunit.c:24:11: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY' 24 | } t ## _tests[] | ^ Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202205110324.7GrtxG8u-lkp@intel.com Fixes: 455a35a6cdb6 ("lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions") Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGS_qxokQAjQRip2vPi80toW7hmBnXf=KMTNT51B1wuDqSZuVQ@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-05-11 10:40:43 -07:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

test_overflow: macrofy some more, do more tests for free Obviously a+b==b+a and a*b==b*a, but the implementation of the fallback checks are not entirely symmetric in how they treat a and b. So we might as well check the (b,a,r,of) tuple as well as the (a,b,r,of) one for + and *. Rather than more copy-paste, factor out the common part to check_one_op. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-06-04 08:41:27 +02:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

overflow: Refactor test skips for Clang-specific issues Convert test exclusion into test skipping. This brings the logic for why a test is being skipped into the test itself, instead of having to spread ifdefs around the code. This will make cleanup easier as minimum tests get raised. Drop __maybe_unused so missed tests will be noticed again and clean up whitespace. For example, clang-11 on i386: [15:52:32] ================== overflow (18 subtests) ================== [15:52:32] [PASSED] u8_u8__u8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] s8_s8__s8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u16_u16__u16_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] s16_s16__s16_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u32_u32__u32_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] s32_s32__s32_overflow_test [15:52:32] [SKIPPED] u64_u64__u64_overflow_test [15:52:32] [SKIPPED] s64_s64__s64_overflow_test [15:52:32] [SKIPPED] u32_u32__int_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u32_u32__u8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u8_u8__int_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] int_int__u8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_sane_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_truncate_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_nonsense_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] overflow_allocation_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] overflow_size_helpers_test [15:52:32] ==================== [PASSED] overflow ===================== [15:52:32] ============================================================ [15:52:32] Testing complete. Ran 18 tests: passed: 15, skipped: 3 Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006230017.1833458-1-keescook@chromium.org

2022-10-06 16:00:17 -07:00

test_overflow: macrofy some more, do more tests for free Obviously a+b==b+a and a*b==b*a, but the implementation of the fallback checks are not entirely symmetric in how they treat a and b. So we might as well check the (b,a,r,of) tuple as well as the (a,b,r,of) one for + and *. Rather than more copy-paste, factor out the common part to check_one_op. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-06-04 08:41:27 +02:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

overflow: Refactor test skips for Clang-specific issues Convert test exclusion into test skipping. This brings the logic for why a test is being skipped into the test itself, instead of having to spread ifdefs around the code. This will make cleanup easier as minimum tests get raised. Drop __maybe_unused so missed tests will be noticed again and clean up whitespace. For example, clang-11 on i386: [15:52:32] ================== overflow (18 subtests) ================== [15:52:32] [PASSED] u8_u8__u8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] s8_s8__s8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u16_u16__u16_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] s16_s16__s16_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u32_u32__u32_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] s32_s32__s32_overflow_test [15:52:32] [SKIPPED] u64_u64__u64_overflow_test [15:52:32] [SKIPPED] s64_s64__s64_overflow_test [15:52:32] [SKIPPED] u32_u32__int_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u32_u32__u8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] u8_u8__int_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] int_int__u8_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_sane_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_overflow_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_truncate_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] shift_nonsense_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] overflow_allocation_test [15:52:32] [PASSED] overflow_size_helpers_test [15:52:32] ==================== [PASSED] overflow ===================== [15:52:32] ============================================================ [15:52:32] Testing complete. Ran 18 tests: passed: 15, skipped: 3 Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006230017.1833458-1-keescook@chromium.org

2022-10-06 16:00:17 -07:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2021-09-20 10:27:16 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

overflow: Split up kunit tests for smaller stack frames Under some pathological 32-bit configs, the shift overflow KUnit tests create huge stack frames. Split up the function to avoid this, separating by rough shift overflow cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202208301850.iuv9VwA8-lkp@intel.com Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-31 11:09:13 -07:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

overflow: Split up kunit tests for smaller stack frames Under some pathological 32-bit configs, the shift overflow KUnit tests create huge stack frames. Split up the function to avoid this, separating by rough shift overflow cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202208301850.iuv9VwA8-lkp@intel.com Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-31 11:09:13 -07:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

overflow: Split up kunit tests for smaller stack frames Under some pathological 32-bit configs, the shift overflow KUnit tests create huge stack frames. Split up the function to avoid this, separating by rough shift overflow cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202208301850.iuv9VwA8-lkp@intel.com Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-31 11:09:13 -07:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

overflow: Split up kunit tests for smaller stack frames Under some pathological 32-bit configs, the shift overflow KUnit tests create huge stack frames. Split up the function to avoid this, separating by rough shift overflow cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202208301850.iuv9VwA8-lkp@intel.com Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-31 11:09:13 -07:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

2021-09-20 10:27:16 -07:00

overflow: Split up kunit tests for smaller stack frames Under some pathological 32-bit configs, the shift overflow KUnit tests create huge stack frames. Split up the function to avoid this, separating by rough shift overflow cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202208301850.iuv9VwA8-lkp@intel.com Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-31 11:09:13 -07:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

overflow: Split up kunit tests for smaller stack frames Under some pathological 32-bit configs, the shift overflow KUnit tests create huge stack frames. Split up the function to avoid this, separating by rough shift overflow cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202208301850.iuv9VwA8-lkp@intel.com Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-31 11:09:13 -07:00

test_overflow: Add shift overflow tests This adds overflow tests for the new check_shift_overflow() helper to validate overflow, signedness glitches, storage glitches, etc. Co-developed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

2018-08-01 14:25:40 -07:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

lib/test_overflow.c: avoid tainting the kernel and fix wrap size This adds __GFP_NOWARN to the kmalloc()-portions of the overflow test to avoid tainting the kernel. Additionally fixes up the math on wrap size to be architecture and page size agnostic. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201905282012.0A8767E24@keescook Fixes: ca90800a91ba ("test_overflow: Add memory allocation overflow tests") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

2019-07-16 16:27:24 -07:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

lib/test_overflow.c: avoid tainting the kernel and fix wrap size This adds __GFP_NOWARN to the kmalloc()-portions of the overflow test to avoid tainting the kernel. Additionally fixes up the math on wrap size to be architecture and page size agnostic. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201905282012.0A8767E24@keescook Fixes: ca90800a91ba ("test_overflow: Add memory allocation overflow tests") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

2019-07-16 16:27:24 -07:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

lib/test_overflow.c: avoid tainting the kernel and fix wrap size This adds __GFP_NOWARN to the kmalloc()-portions of the overflow test to avoid tainting the kernel. Additionally fixes up the math on wrap size to be architecture and page size agnostic. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201905282012.0A8767E24@keescook Fixes: ca90800a91ba ("test_overflow: Add memory allocation overflow tests") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

2019-07-16 16:27:24 -07:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

2021-09-20 10:27:16 -07:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

2021-09-20 10:27:16 -07:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

2021-09-20 10:27:16 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

2021-09-20 10:27:16 -07:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

2021-09-20 10:27:16 -07:00

2018-05-10 16:40:03 -07:00

overflow: Implement size_t saturating arithmetic helpers In order to perform more open-coded replacements of common allocation size arithmetic, the kernel needs saturating (SIZE_MAX) helpers for multiplication, addition, and subtraction. For example, it is common in allocators, especially on realloc, to add to an existing size: p = krealloc(map->patch, sizeof(struct reg_sequence) * (map->patch_regs + num_regs), GFP_KERNEL); There is no existing saturating replacement for this calculation, and just leaving the addition open coded inside array_size() could potentially overflow as well. For example, an overflow in an expression for a size_t argument might wrap to zero: array_size(anything, something_at_size_max + 1) == 0 Introduce size_mul(), size_add(), and size_sub() helpers that implicitly promote arguments to size_t and saturated calculations for use in allocations. With these helpers it is also possible to redefine array_size(), array3_size(), flex_array_size(), and struct_size() in terms of the new helpers. As with the check_*_overflow() helpers, the new helpers use __must_check, though what is really desired is a way to make sure that assignment is only to a size_t lvalue. Without this, it's still possible to introduce overflow/underflow via type conversion (i.e. from size_t to int). Enforcing this will currently need to be left to static analysis or future use of -Wconversion. Additionally update the overflow unit tests to force runtime evaluation for the pathological cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2021-09-18 15:17:53 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Implement size_t saturating arithmetic helpers In order to perform more open-coded replacements of common allocation size arithmetic, the kernel needs saturating (SIZE_MAX) helpers for multiplication, addition, and subtraction. For example, it is common in allocators, especially on realloc, to add to an existing size: p = krealloc(map->patch, sizeof(struct reg_sequence) * (map->patch_regs + num_regs), GFP_KERNEL); There is no existing saturating replacement for this calculation, and just leaving the addition open coded inside array_size() could potentially overflow as well. For example, an overflow in an expression for a size_t argument might wrap to zero: array_size(anything, something_at_size_max + 1) == 0 Introduce size_mul(), size_add(), and size_sub() helpers that implicitly promote arguments to size_t and saturated calculations for use in allocations. With these helpers it is also possible to redefine array_size(), array3_size(), flex_array_size(), and struct_size() in terms of the new helpers. As with the check_*_overflow() helpers, the new helpers use __must_check, though what is really desired is a way to make sure that assignment is only to a size_t lvalue. Without this, it's still possible to introduce overflow/underflow via type conversion (i.e. from size_t to int). Enforcing this will currently need to be left to static analysis or future use of -Wconversion. Additionally update the overflow unit tests to force runtime evaluation for the pathological cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2021-09-18 15:17:53 -07:00

overflow: Provide constant expression struct_size There have been cases where struct_size() (or flex_array_size()) needs to be calculated for an initializer, which requires it be a constant expression. This is possible when the "count" argument is a constant expression, so provide this ability for the helpers. Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Tested-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220210010407.GA701603@embeddedor

2022-02-09 16:40:41 -08:00

overflow: Add struct_size_t() helper While struct_size() is normally used in situations where the structure type already has a pointer instance, there are places where no variable is available. In the past, this has been worked around by using a typed NULL first argument, but this is a bit ugly. Add a helper to do this, and replace the handful of instances of the code pattern with it. Instances were found with this Coccinelle script: @struct_size_t@ identifier STRUCT, MEMBER; expression COUNT; @@ - struct_size((struct STRUCT *)$0\|NULL$, + struct_size_t(struct STRUCT, MEMBER, COUNT) Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Cc: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Cc: HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com> Cc: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com> Cc: Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com> Cc: Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com> Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com Cc: storagedev@microchip.com Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230522211810.never.421-kees@kernel.org

2023-05-22 14:18:13 -07:00

overflow: Implement size_t saturating arithmetic helpers In order to perform more open-coded replacements of common allocation size arithmetic, the kernel needs saturating (SIZE_MAX) helpers for multiplication, addition, and subtraction. For example, it is common in allocators, especially on realloc, to add to an existing size: p = krealloc(map->patch, sizeof(struct reg_sequence) * (map->patch_regs + num_regs), GFP_KERNEL); There is no existing saturating replacement for this calculation, and just leaving the addition open coded inside array_size() could potentially overflow as well. For example, an overflow in an expression for a size_t argument might wrap to zero: array_size(anything, something_at_size_max + 1) == 0 Introduce size_mul(), size_add(), and size_sub() helpers that implicitly promote arguments to size_t and saturated calculations for use in allocations. With these helpers it is also possible to redefine array_size(), array3_size(), flex_array_size(), and struct_size() in terms of the new helpers. As with the check_*_overflow() helpers, the new helpers use __must_check, though what is really desired is a way to make sure that assignment is only to a size_t lvalue. Without this, it's still possible to introduce overflow/underflow via type conversion (i.e. from size_t to int). Enforcing this will currently need to be left to static analysis or future use of -Wconversion. Additionally update the overflow unit tests to force runtime evaluation for the pathological cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2021-09-18 15:17:53 -07:00

overflow: Provide constant expression struct_size There have been cases where struct_size() (or flex_array_size()) needs to be calculated for an initializer, which requires it be a constant expression. This is possible when the "count" argument is a constant expression, so provide this ability for the helpers. Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Tested-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220210010407.GA701603@embeddedor

2022-02-09 16:40:41 -08:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Implement size_t saturating arithmetic helpers In order to perform more open-coded replacements of common allocation size arithmetic, the kernel needs saturating (SIZE_MAX) helpers for multiplication, addition, and subtraction. For example, it is common in allocators, especially on realloc, to add to an existing size: p = krealloc(map->patch, sizeof(struct reg_sequence) * (map->patch_regs + num_regs), GFP_KERNEL); There is no existing saturating replacement for this calculation, and just leaving the addition open coded inside array_size() could potentially overflow as well. For example, an overflow in an expression for a size_t argument might wrap to zero: array_size(anything, something_at_size_max + 1) == 0 Introduce size_mul(), size_add(), and size_sub() helpers that implicitly promote arguments to size_t and saturated calculations for use in allocations. With these helpers it is also possible to redefine array_size(), array3_size(), flex_array_size(), and struct_size() in terms of the new helpers. As with the check_*_overflow() helpers, the new helpers use __must_check, though what is really desired is a way to make sure that assignment is only to a size_t lvalue. Without this, it's still possible to introduce overflow/underflow via type conversion (i.e. from size_t to int). Enforcing this will currently need to be left to static analysis or future use of -Wconversion. Additionally update the overflow unit tests to force runtime evaluation for the pathological cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2021-09-18 15:17:53 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Implement size_t saturating arithmetic helpers In order to perform more open-coded replacements of common allocation size arithmetic, the kernel needs saturating (SIZE_MAX) helpers for multiplication, addition, and subtraction. For example, it is common in allocators, especially on realloc, to add to an existing size: p = krealloc(map->patch, sizeof(struct reg_sequence) * (map->patch_regs + num_regs), GFP_KERNEL); There is no existing saturating replacement for this calculation, and just leaving the addition open coded inside array_size() could potentially overflow as well. For example, an overflow in an expression for a size_t argument might wrap to zero: array_size(anything, something_at_size_max + 1) == 0 Introduce size_mul(), size_add(), and size_sub() helpers that implicitly promote arguments to size_t and saturated calculations for use in allocations. With these helpers it is also possible to redefine array_size(), array3_size(), flex_array_size(), and struct_size() in terms of the new helpers. As with the check_*_overflow() helpers, the new helpers use __must_check, though what is really desired is a way to make sure that assignment is only to a size_t lvalue. Without this, it's still possible to introduce overflow/underflow via type conversion (i.e. from size_t to int). Enforcing this will currently need to be left to static analysis or future use of -Wconversion. Additionally update the overflow unit tests to force runtime evaluation for the pathological cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2021-09-18 15:17:53 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Implement size_t saturating arithmetic helpers In order to perform more open-coded replacements of common allocation size arithmetic, the kernel needs saturating (SIZE_MAX) helpers for multiplication, addition, and subtraction. For example, it is common in allocators, especially on realloc, to add to an existing size: p = krealloc(map->patch, sizeof(struct reg_sequence) * (map->patch_regs + num_regs), GFP_KERNEL); There is no existing saturating replacement for this calculation, and just leaving the addition open coded inside array_size() could potentially overflow as well. For example, an overflow in an expression for a size_t argument might wrap to zero: array_size(anything, something_at_size_max + 1) == 0 Introduce size_mul(), size_add(), and size_sub() helpers that implicitly promote arguments to size_t and saturated calculations for use in allocations. With these helpers it is also possible to redefine array_size(), array3_size(), flex_array_size(), and struct_size() in terms of the new helpers. As with the check_*_overflow() helpers, the new helpers use __must_check, though what is really desired is a way to make sure that assignment is only to a size_t lvalue. Without this, it's still possible to introduce overflow/underflow via type conversion (i.e. from size_t to int). Enforcing this will currently need to be left to static analysis or future use of -Wconversion. Additionally update the overflow unit tests to force runtime evaluation for the pathological cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2021-09-18 15:17:53 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Implement size_t saturating arithmetic helpers In order to perform more open-coded replacements of common allocation size arithmetic, the kernel needs saturating (SIZE_MAX) helpers for multiplication, addition, and subtraction. For example, it is common in allocators, especially on realloc, to add to an existing size: p = krealloc(map->patch, sizeof(struct reg_sequence) * (map->patch_regs + num_regs), GFP_KERNEL); There is no existing saturating replacement for this calculation, and just leaving the addition open coded inside array_size() could potentially overflow as well. For example, an overflow in an expression for a size_t argument might wrap to zero: array_size(anything, something_at_size_max + 1) == 0 Introduce size_mul(), size_add(), and size_sub() helpers that implicitly promote arguments to size_t and saturated calculations for use in allocations. With these helpers it is also possible to redefine array_size(), array3_size(), flex_array_size(), and struct_size() in terms of the new helpers. As with the check_*_overflow() helpers, the new helpers use __must_check, though what is really desired is a way to make sure that assignment is only to a size_t lvalue. Without this, it's still possible to introduce overflow/underflow via type conversion (i.e. from size_t to int). Enforcing this will currently need to be left to static analysis or future use of -Wconversion. Additionally update the overflow unit tests to force runtime evaluation for the pathological cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2021-09-18 15:17:53 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Implement size_t saturating arithmetic helpers In order to perform more open-coded replacements of common allocation size arithmetic, the kernel needs saturating (SIZE_MAX) helpers for multiplication, addition, and subtraction. For example, it is common in allocators, especially on realloc, to add to an existing size: p = krealloc(map->patch, sizeof(struct reg_sequence) * (map->patch_regs + num_regs), GFP_KERNEL); There is no existing saturating replacement for this calculation, and just leaving the addition open coded inside array_size() could potentially overflow as well. For example, an overflow in an expression for a size_t argument might wrap to zero: array_size(anything, something_at_size_max + 1) == 0 Introduce size_mul(), size_add(), and size_sub() helpers that implicitly promote arguments to size_t and saturated calculations for use in allocations. With these helpers it is also possible to redefine array_size(), array3_size(), flex_array_size(), and struct_size() in terms of the new helpers. As with the check_*_overflow() helpers, the new helpers use __must_check, though what is really desired is a way to make sure that assignment is only to a size_t lvalue. Without this, it's still possible to introduce overflow/underflow via type conversion (i.e. from size_t to int). Enforcing this will currently need to be left to static analysis or future use of -Wconversion. Additionally update the overflow unit tests to force runtime evaluation for the pathological cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2021-09-18 15:17:53 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Implement size_t saturating arithmetic helpers In order to perform more open-coded replacements of common allocation size arithmetic, the kernel needs saturating (SIZE_MAX) helpers for multiplication, addition, and subtraction. For example, it is common in allocators, especially on realloc, to add to an existing size: p = krealloc(map->patch, sizeof(struct reg_sequence) * (map->patch_regs + num_regs), GFP_KERNEL); There is no existing saturating replacement for this calculation, and just leaving the addition open coded inside array_size() could potentially overflow as well. For example, an overflow in an expression for a size_t argument might wrap to zero: array_size(anything, something_at_size_max + 1) == 0 Introduce size_mul(), size_add(), and size_sub() helpers that implicitly promote arguments to size_t and saturated calculations for use in allocations. With these helpers it is also possible to redefine array_size(), array3_size(), flex_array_size(), and struct_size() in terms of the new helpers. As with the check_*_overflow() helpers, the new helpers use __must_check, though what is really desired is a way to make sure that assignment is only to a size_t lvalue. Without this, it's still possible to introduce overflow/underflow via type conversion (i.e. from size_t to int). Enforcing this will currently need to be left to static analysis or future use of -Wconversion. Additionally update the overflow unit tests to force runtime evaluation for the pathological cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2021-09-18 15:17:53 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Implement size_t saturating arithmetic helpers In order to perform more open-coded replacements of common allocation size arithmetic, the kernel needs saturating (SIZE_MAX) helpers for multiplication, addition, and subtraction. For example, it is common in allocators, especially on realloc, to add to an existing size: p = krealloc(map->patch, sizeof(struct reg_sequence) * (map->patch_regs + num_regs), GFP_KERNEL); There is no existing saturating replacement for this calculation, and just leaving the addition open coded inside array_size() could potentially overflow as well. For example, an overflow in an expression for a size_t argument might wrap to zero: array_size(anything, something_at_size_max + 1) == 0 Introduce size_mul(), size_add(), and size_sub() helpers that implicitly promote arguments to size_t and saturated calculations for use in allocations. With these helpers it is also possible to redefine array_size(), array3_size(), flex_array_size(), and struct_size() in terms of the new helpers. As with the check_*_overflow() helpers, the new helpers use __must_check, though what is really desired is a way to make sure that assignment is only to a size_t lvalue. Without this, it's still possible to introduce overflow/underflow via type conversion (i.e. from size_t to int). Enforcing this will currently need to be left to static analysis or future use of -Wconversion. Additionally update the overflow unit tests to force runtime evaluation for the pathological cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2021-09-18 15:17:53 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Implement size_t saturating arithmetic helpers In order to perform more open-coded replacements of common allocation size arithmetic, the kernel needs saturating (SIZE_MAX) helpers for multiplication, addition, and subtraction. For example, it is common in allocators, especially on realloc, to add to an existing size: p = krealloc(map->patch, sizeof(struct reg_sequence) * (map->patch_regs + num_regs), GFP_KERNEL); There is no existing saturating replacement for this calculation, and just leaving the addition open coded inside array_size() could potentially overflow as well. For example, an overflow in an expression for a size_t argument might wrap to zero: array_size(anything, something_at_size_max + 1) == 0 Introduce size_mul(), size_add(), and size_sub() helpers that implicitly promote arguments to size_t and saturated calculations for use in allocations. With these helpers it is also possible to redefine array_size(), array3_size(), flex_array_size(), and struct_size() in terms of the new helpers. As with the check_*_overflow() helpers, the new helpers use __must_check, though what is really desired is a way to make sure that assignment is only to a size_t lvalue. Without this, it's still possible to introduce overflow/underflow via type conversion (i.e. from size_t to int). Enforcing this will currently need to be left to static analysis or future use of -Wconversion. Additionally update the overflow unit tests to force runtime evaluation for the pathological cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2021-09-18 15:17:53 -07:00

overflow: Introduce overflows_type() and castable_to_type() Implement a robust overflows_type() macro to test if a variable or constant value would overflow another variable or type. This can be used as a constant expression for static_assert() (which requires a constant expression[1][2]) when used on constant values. This must be constructed manually, since __builtin_add_overflow() does not produce a constant expression[3]. Additionally adds castable_to_type(), similar to __same_type(), but for checking if a constant value would overflow if cast to a given type. Add unit tests for overflows_type(), __same_type(), and castable_to_type() to the existing KUnit "overflow" test: [16:03:33] ================== overflow (21 subtests) ================== ... [16:03:33] [PASSED] overflows_type_test [16:03:33] [PASSED] same_type_test [16:03:33] [PASSED] castable_to_type_test [16:03:33] ==================== [PASSED] overflow ===================== [16:03:33] ============================================================ [16:03:33] Testing complete. Ran 21 tests: passed: 21 [16:03:33] Elapsed time: 24.022s total, 0.002s configuring, 22.598s building, 0.767s running [1] https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/_Static_assert [2] C11 standard (ISO/IEC 9899:2011): 6.7.10 Static assertions [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Integer-Overflow-Builtins.html 6.56 Built-in Functions to Perform Arithmetic with Overflow Checking Built-in Function: bool __builtin_add_overflow (type1 a, type2 b, Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Co-developed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221024201125.1416422-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com

2022-10-24 23:11:25 +03:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

overflow: disable failing tests for older clang versions Building the overflow kunit tests with clang-11 fails with: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=arm --make_options LLVM=1 \ overflow ... ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __mulodi4 ... Clang 11 and earlier generate unwanted libcalls for signed output, unsigned input. Disable these tests for now, but should these become used in the kernel we might consider that as justification for dropping clang-11 support. Keep the clang-11 build alive a little bit longer. Avoid -Wunused-function warnings via __maybe_unused. To test W=1: $ make LLVM=1 -j128 defconfig $ ./scripts/config -e KUNIT -e KUNIT_ALL $ make LLVM=1 -j128 olddefconfig lib/overflow_kunit.o W=1 Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1711 Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3203143f1356a4e4e3ada231156fc6da6e1a9f9d Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006171751.3444575-1-ndesaulniers@google.com

2022-10-06 10:17:51 -07:00

overflow: Allow mixed type arguments When the check_[op]_overflow() helpers were introduced, all arguments were required to be the same type to make the fallback macros simpler. However, now that the fallback macros have been removed[1], it is fine to allow mixed types, which makes using the helpers much more useful, as they can be used to test for type-based overflows (e.g. adding two large ints but storing into a u8), as would be handy in the drm core[2]. Remove the restriction, and add additional self-tests that exercise some of the mixed-type overflow cases, and double-check for accidental macro side-effects. [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4eb6bd55cfb22ffc20652732340c4962f3ac9a91 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220824084514.2261614-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-29 13:37:17 -07:00

overflow: Split up kunit tests for smaller stack frames Under some pathological 32-bit configs, the shift overflow KUnit tests create huge stack frames. Split up the function to avoid this, separating by rough shift overflow cases. Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202208301850.iuv9VwA8-lkp@intel.com Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2022-08-31 11:09:13 -07:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

overflow: Introduce overflows_type() and castable_to_type() Implement a robust overflows_type() macro to test if a variable or constant value would overflow another variable or type. This can be used as a constant expression for static_assert() (which requires a constant expression[1][2]) when used on constant values. This must be constructed manually, since __builtin_add_overflow() does not produce a constant expression[3]. Additionally adds castable_to_type(), similar to __same_type(), but for checking if a constant value would overflow if cast to a given type. Add unit tests for overflows_type(), __same_type(), and castable_to_type() to the existing KUnit "overflow" test: [16:03:33] ================== overflow (21 subtests) ================== ... [16:03:33] [PASSED] overflows_type_test [16:03:33] [PASSED] same_type_test [16:03:33] [PASSED] castable_to_type_test [16:03:33] ==================== [PASSED] overflow ===================== [16:03:33] ============================================================ [16:03:33] Testing complete. Ran 21 tests: passed: 21 [16:03:33] Elapsed time: 24.022s total, 0.002s configuring, 22.598s building, 0.767s running [1] https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/_Static_assert [2] C11 standard (ISO/IEC 9899:2011): 6.7.10 Static assertions [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Integer-Overflow-Builtins.html 6.56 Built-in Functions to Perform Arithmetic with Overflow Checking Built-in Function: bool __builtin_add_overflow (type1 a, type2 b, Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev Co-developed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221024201125.1416422-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com

2022-10-24 23:11:25 +03:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

2022-02-16 14:17:49 -08:00

lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functions This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

2018-05-08 00:36:28 +02:00

1149 lines 44 KiB Raw Permalink Normal View History

1149 lines

44 KiB

Raw Permalink Normal View History