linux

mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-10-14 05:55:17 +00:00

813 lines

29 KiB

Raw Permalink Normal View History

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00




























































































































































































lib: test_scanf: Remove pointless use of type_min() with unsigned types sparse was producing warnings of the form: sparse: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff0001 becomes 1) There is no actual problem here. Using type_min() on an unsigned type results in an (expected) truncation. However, there is no need to test an unsigned value against type_min(). The minimum value of an unsigned is obviously 0, and any value cast to an unsigned type is >= 0, so for unsigneds only type_max() need be tested. This patch also takes the opportunity to clean up the implementation of simple_numbers_loop() to use a common pattern for the positive and negative test. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210525122012.6336-2-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-25 13:20:11 +01:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00














lib: test_scanf: Remove pointless use of type_min() with unsigned types sparse was producing warnings of the form: sparse: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff0001 becomes 1) There is no actual problem here. Using type_min() on an unsigned type results in an (expected) truncation. However, there is no need to test an unsigned value against type_min(). The minimum value of an unsigned is obviously 0, and any value cast to an unsigned type is >= 0, so for unsigneds only type_max() need be tested. This patch also takes the opportunity to clean up the implementation of simple_numbers_loop() to use a common pattern for the positive and negative test. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210525122012.6336-2-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-25 13:20:11 +01:00


lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib: test_scanf: Remove pointless use of type_min() with unsigned types sparse was producing warnings of the form: sparse: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff0001 becomes 1) There is no actual problem here. Using type_min() on an unsigned type results in an (expected) truncation. However, there is no need to test an unsigned value against type_min(). The minimum value of an unsigned is obviously 0, and any value cast to an unsigned type is >= 0, so for unsigneds only type_max() need be tested. This patch also takes the opportunity to clean up the implementation of simple_numbers_loop() to use a common pattern for the positive and negative test. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210525122012.6336-2-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-25 13:20:11 +01:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00





























































lib/test_scanf: Handle n_bits == 0 in random tests UBSAN reported (via LKP) [ 11.021349][ T1] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in lib/test_scanf.c:275:51 [ 11.022782][ T1] shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'unsigned int' When n_bits == 0, the shift is out of range. Switch code to use GENMASK to handle this case. Fixes: 50f530e176ea ("lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion") Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210727150132.28920-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com 2021-07-27 18:01:32 +03:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00







lib/test_scanf: Handle n_bits == 0 in random tests UBSAN reported (via LKP) [ 11.021349][ T1] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in lib/test_scanf.c:275:51 [ 11.022782][ T1] shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'unsigned int' When n_bits == 0, the shift is out of range. Switch code to use GENMASK to handle this case. Fixes: 50f530e176ea ("lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion") Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210727150132.28920-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com 2021-07-27 18:01:32 +03:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00




















































































































lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00






lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00





lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00





lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00





lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00







lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00









lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00






lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00














lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00





lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00





lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00









lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00









lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00






lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00





lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00





lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00





lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00
lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00

lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00







lib/test_scanf: split up number parsing test routines It turns out that gcc has real trouble merging all the temporary on-stack buffer allocation. So despite the fact that their lifetimes do not overlap, gcc will allocate stack for all of them when they have different types. Which they do in the number scanning test routines. This is unfortunate in general, but with lots of test-cases in one function, it becomes a real problem. gcc will allocate a huge stack frame for no actual good reason. We have tried to counteract this tendency of gcc not merging stack slots (see "-fconserve-stack"), but that has limited effect (and should be on by default these days, iirc). So with all the debug options enabled on an i386 allmodconfig build, we end up with overly big stack frames, and the resulting stack frame size warnings (now errors): lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_val_width’: lib/test_scanf.c:530:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 530 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list_field_width_typemax’: lib/test_scanf.c:488:1: error: the frame size of 2568 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 488 \| } \| ^ lib/test_scanf.c: In function ‘numbers_list’: lib/test_scanf.c:437:1: error: the frame size of 2088 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=] 437 \| } \| ^ In this particular case, the reasonably straightforward solution is to just split out the test routines into multiple more targeted versions. That way we don't have one huge stack, but several smaller ones, and they aren't active all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-09-06 11:04:03 -07:00












lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00













lib: test_scanf: Add explicit type cast to result initialization in test_number_prefix() A recent change in clang allows it to consider more expressions as compile time constants, which causes it to point out an implicit conversion in the scanf tests: lib/test_scanf.c:661:2: warning: implicit conversion from 'int' to 'unsigned char' changes value from -168 to 88 [-Wconstant-conversion] 661 \| test_number_prefix(unsigned char, "0xA7", "%2hhx%hhx", 0, 0xa7, 2, check_uchar); \| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/test_scanf.c:609:29: note: expanded from macro 'test_number_prefix' 609 \| T result[2] = {~expect[0], ~expect[1]}; \ \| ~ ^~~~~~~~~~ 1 warning generated. The result of the bitwise negation is the type of the operand after going through the integer promotion rules, so this truncation is expected but harmless, as the initial values in the result array get overwritten by _test() anyways. Add an explicit cast to the expected type in test_number_prefix() to silence the warning. There is no functional change, as all the tests still pass with GCC 13.1.0 and clang 18.0.0. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linuxq/issues/1899 Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/610ec954e1f81c0e8fcadedcd25afe643f5a094e Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807-test_scanf-wconstant-conversion-v2-1-839ca39083e1@kernel.org 2023-08-07 08:36:28 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00























































lib/test: fix spelling mistakes Fix some spelling mistakes in comments found by "codespell": thats ==> that's unitialized ==> uninitialized panicing ==> panicking sucess ==> success possitive ==> positive intepreted ==> interpreted Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210607133036.12525-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> [test_bfp.c] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-07-07 18:07:28 -07:00
lib: test_scanf: Add tests for sscanf number conversion Adds test_sscanf to test various number conversion cases, as number conversion was previously broken. This also tests the simple_strtoxxx() functions exported from vsprintf.c. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514161206.30821-3-rf@opensource.cirrus.com 2021-05-14 17:12:05 +01:00

813 lines 29 KiB Raw Permalink Normal View History

813 lines

29 KiB

Raw Permalink Normal View History