2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-02 19:15:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-02 16:29:19 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
driver core: add devname module aliases to allow module on-demand auto-loading
This adds:
alias: devname:<name>
to some common kernel modules, which will allow the on-demand loading
of the kernel module when the device node is accessed.
Ideally all these modules would be compiled-in, but distros seems too
much in love with their modularization that we need to cover the common
cases with this new facility. It will allow us to remove a bunch of pretty
useless init scripts and modprobes from init scripts.
The static device node aliases will be carried in the module itself. The
program depmod will extract this information to a file in the module directory:
$ cat /lib/modules/2.6.34-00650-g537b60d-dirty/modules.devname
# Device nodes to trigger on-demand module loading.
microcode cpu/microcode c10:184
fuse fuse c10:229
ppp_generic ppp c108:0
tun net/tun c10:200
dm_mod mapper/control c10:235
Udev will pick up the depmod created file on startup and create all the
static device nodes which the kernel modules specify, so that these modules
get automatically loaded when the device node is accessed:
$ /sbin/udevd --debug
...
static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/cpu/microcode' c10:184
static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/fuse' c10:229
static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/ppp' c108:0
static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/net/tun' c10:200
static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/mapper/control' c10:235
udev_rules_apply_static_dev_perms: chmod '/dev/net/tun' 0666
udev_rules_apply_static_dev_perms: chmod '/dev/fuse' 0666
A few device nodes are switched to statically allocated numbers, to allow
the static nodes to work. This might also useful for systems which still run
a plain static /dev, which is completely unsafe to use with any dynamic minor
numbers.
Note:
The devname aliases must be limited to the *common* and *single*instance*
device nodes, like the misc devices, and never be used for conceptually limited
systems like the loop devices, which should rather get fixed properly and get a
control node for losetup to talk to, instead of creating a random number of
device nodes in advance, regardless if they are ever used.
This facility is to hide the mess distros are creating with too modualized
kernels, and just to hide that these modules are not compiled-in, and not to
paper-over broken concepts. Thanks! :)
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Signed-Off-By: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-05-20 18:07:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:11:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-06 20:33:20 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-10 22:54:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
locking/atomics: COCCINELLE/treewide: Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() patterns to READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE()
Please do not apply this to mainline directly, instead please re-run the
coccinelle script shown below and apply its output.
For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in
preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the
former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of
ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't harmful, and changing them results in
churn.
However, for some features, the read/write distinction is critical to
correct operation. To distinguish these cases, separate read/write
accessors must be used. This patch migrates (most) remaining
ACCESS_ONCE() instances to {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), using the following
coccinelle script:
----
// Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() uses to equivalent READ_ONCE() and
// WRITE_ONCE()
// $ make coccicheck COCCI=/home/mark/once.cocci SPFLAGS="--include-headers" MODE=patch
virtual patch
@ depends on patch @
expression E1, E2;
@@
- ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2
+ WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2)
@ depends on patch @
expression E;
@@
- ACCESS_ONCE(E)
+ READ_ONCE(E)
----
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: shuah@kernel.org
Cc: snitzer@redhat.com
Cc: thor.thayer@linux.intel.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508792849-3115-19-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-23 14:07:29 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-03 11:04:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-01 10:07:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-26 19:48:07 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-26 19:48:07 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-01 10:07:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-03 11:04:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-03 11:04:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-21 18:02:28 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 15:52:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-04 09:46:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 15:52:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-10 22:54:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-11 21:16:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-21 18:02:28 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-19 03:08:27 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-21 18:02:28 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-10 22:54:59 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:57 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-11 21:16:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-21 18:02:36 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-11 21:16:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-21 18:02:36 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-21 11:18:07 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-21 10:52:06 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-21 10:52:06 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-21 10:52:06 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-11 21:16:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-11 21:16:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-21 18:02:04 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-04 23:27:40 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-03 11:04:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-21 18:02:36 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-21 18:02:36 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-21 18:02:36 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:56 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-04 23:27:40 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-21 09:34:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-21 09:34:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-22 13:48:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:11:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-22 13:48:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-08 17:00:23 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-18 15:53:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-21 09:34:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-18 15:53:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-18 15:53:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-09-12 09:38:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-18 15:53:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-09-12 09:38:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-31 13:25:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-07-01 17:28:41 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-31 13:25:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-18 15:53:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:26 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-21 09:11:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-04 13:22:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-04 13:22:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-28 16:43:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-03-21 18:02:36 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-28 16:43:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-21 18:02:36 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-13 09:16:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-21 09:33:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:42 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:42 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-28 15:15:24 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:42 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:25 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-18 15:53:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:42 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-19 03:08:27 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 23:31:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 23:31:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 23:31:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 23:31:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 23:31:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-21 09:33:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-18 15:53:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-21 09:33:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:00 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-04 13:04:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-23 13:52:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-10 15:46:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-13 09:16:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 09:49:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 09:49:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 09:49:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 09:49:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 09:49:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-12 09:49:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:56 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-02-06 01:38:39 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-18 15:53:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 22:06:08 -04:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 22:06:08 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 22:06:08 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-27 10:45:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-16 16:47:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 22:06:08 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-09 10:28:36 -04:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 22:06:08 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-08 16:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-08 16:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-18 21:16:42 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-19 14:50:37 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mm: multi-gen LRU: groundwork
Evictable pages are divided into multiple generations for each lruvec.
The youngest generation number is stored in lrugen->max_seq for both
anon and file types as they are aged on an equal footing. The oldest
generation numbers are stored in lrugen->min_seq[] separately for anon
and file types as clean file pages can be evicted regardless of swap
constraints. These three variables are monotonically increasing.
Generation numbers are truncated into order_base_2(MAX_NR_GENS+1) bits
in order to fit into the gen counter in folio->flags. Each truncated
generation number is an index to lrugen->lists[]. The sliding window
technique is used to track at least MIN_NR_GENS and at most
MAX_NR_GENS generations. The gen counter stores a value within [1,
MAX_NR_GENS] while a page is on one of lrugen->lists[]. Otherwise it
stores 0.
There are two conceptually independent procedures: "the aging", which
produces young generations, and "the eviction", which consumes old
generations. They form a closed-loop system, i.e., "the page reclaim".
Both procedures can be invoked from userspace for the purposes of working
set estimation and proactive reclaim. These techniques are commonly used
to optimize job scheduling (bin packing) in data centers [1][2].
To avoid confusion, the terms "hot" and "cold" will be applied to the
multi-gen LRU, as a new convention; the terms "active" and "inactive" will
be applied to the active/inactive LRU, as usual.
The protection of hot pages and the selection of cold pages are based
on page access channels and patterns. There are two access channels:
one through page tables and the other through file descriptors. The
protection of the former channel is by design stronger because:
1. The uncertainty in determining the access patterns of the former
channel is higher due to the approximation of the accessed bit.
2. The cost of evicting the former channel is higher due to the TLB
flushes required and the likelihood of encountering the dirty bit.
3. The penalty of underprotecting the former channel is higher because
applications usually do not prepare themselves for major page
faults like they do for blocked I/O. E.g., GUI applications
commonly use dedicated I/O threads to avoid blocking rendering
threads.
There are also two access patterns: one with temporal locality and the
other without. For the reasons listed above, the former channel is
assumed to follow the former pattern unless VM_SEQ_READ or VM_RAND_READ is
present; the latter channel is assumed to follow the latter pattern unless
outlying refaults have been observed [3][4].
The next patch will address the "outlying refaults". Three macros, i.e.,
LRU_REFS_WIDTH, LRU_REFS_PGOFF and LRU_REFS_MASK, used later are added in
this patch to make the entire patchset less diffy.
A page is added to the youngest generation on faulting. The aging needs
to check the accessed bit at least twice before handing this page over to
the eviction. The first check takes care of the accessed bit set on the
initial fault; the second check makes sure this page has not been used
since then. This protocol, AKA second chance, requires a minimum of two
generations, hence MIN_NR_GENS.
[1] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3297858.3304053
[2] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3503222.3507731
[3] https://lwn.net/Articles/495543/
[4] https://lwn.net/Articles/815342/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220918080010.2920238-6-yuzhao@google.com
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Acked-by: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Acked-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <heftig@archlinux.org>
Acked-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Acked-by: Steven Barrett <steven@liquorix.net>
Acked-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Byrne <djbyrne@mtu.edu>
Tested-by: Donald Carr <d@chaos-reins.com>
Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@yandex.ru>
Tested-by: Shuang Zhai <szhai2@cs.rochester.edu>
Tested-by: Sofia Trinh <sofia.trinh@edi.works>
Tested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Michael Larabel <Michael@MichaelLarabel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-18 02:00:02 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 10:36:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-27 10:45:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 10:36:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-20 17:58:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-22 16:30:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-25 14:05:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-25 14:05:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-02 11:10:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 10:36:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 10:36:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 10:36:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 10:36:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 10:53:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-07 15:28:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 10:36:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 10:36:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-16 16:47:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 10:36:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 10:36:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-18 10:36:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:28 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-10-26 14:22:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-07 16:30:44 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-09-08 16:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-08 16:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:54 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:05 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-05 15:50:43 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-05 15:50:43 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-05 15:50:43 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-05 15:50:43 -04:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-21 09:33:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: require /dev/fuse reads to have enough buffer capacity (take 2)
[ This retries commit d4b13963f217 ("fuse: require /dev/fuse reads to have
enough buffer capacity"), which was reverted. In this version we require
only `sizeof(fuse_in_header) + sizeof(fuse_write_in)` instead of 4K for
FUSE request header room, because, contrary to libfuse and kernel client
behaviour, GlusterFS actually provides only so much room for request
header. ]
A FUSE filesystem server queues /dev/fuse sys_read calls to get filesystem
requests to handle. It does not know in advance what would be that request
as it can be anything that client issues - LOOKUP, READ, WRITE, ... Many
requests are short and retrieve data from the filesystem. However WRITE and
NOTIFY_REPLY write data into filesystem.
Before getting into operation phase, FUSE filesystem server and kernel
client negotiate what should be the maximum write size the client will ever
issue. After negotiation the contract in between server/client is that the
filesystem server then should queue /dev/fuse sys_read calls with enough
buffer capacity to receive any client request - WRITE in particular, while
FUSE client should not, in particular, send WRITE requests with >
negotiated max_write payload. FUSE client in kernel and libfuse
historically reserve 4K for request header. However an existing filesystem
server - GlusterFS - was found which reserves only 80 bytes for header room
(= `sizeof(fuse_in_header) + sizeof(fuse_write_in)`).
Since
`sizeof(fuse_in_header) + sizeof(fuse_write_in)` ==
`sizeof(fuse_in_header) + sizeof(fuse_read_in)` ==
`sizeof(fuse_in_header) + sizeof(fuse_notify_retrieve_in)`
is the absolute minimum any sane filesystem should be using for header
room, the contract is that filesystem server should queue sys_reads with
`sizeof(fuse_in_header) + sizeof(fuse_write_in)` + max_write buffer.
If the filesystem server does not follow this contract, what can happen
is that fuse_dev_do_read will see that request size is > buffer size,
and then it will return EIO to client who issued the request but won't
indicate in any way that there is a problem to filesystem server.
This can be hard to diagnose because for some requests, e.g. for
NOTIFY_REPLY which mimics WRITE, there is no client thread that is
waiting for request completion and that EIO goes nowhere, while on
filesystem server side things look like the kernel is not replying back
after successful NOTIFY_RETRIEVE request made by the server.
We can make the problem easy to diagnose if we indicate via error return to
filesystem server when it is violating the contract. This should not
practically cause problems because if a filesystem server is using shorter
buffer, writes to it were already very likely to cause EIO, and if the
filesystem is read-only it should be too following FUSE_MIN_READ_BUFFER
minimum buffer size.
Please see [1] for context where the problem of stuck filesystem was hit
for real (because kernel client was incorrectly sending more than
max_write data with NOTIFY_REPLY; see also previous patch), how the
situation was traced and for more involving patch that did not make it
into the tree.
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=155057023600853&w=2
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com>
Tested-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Cc: Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-07-08 17:03:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-06 00:19:40 -08:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-10 22:54:53 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-09 21:23:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-24 10:40:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-09 21:23:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-07 20:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-12 16:57:53 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-06 00:19:40 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-06 00:19:40 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-06 00:19:40 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-06 00:19:40 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-22 09:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-06 00:19:40 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-24 10:40:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 23:31:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-16 23:31:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-25 12:28:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-28 16:43:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-12 05:22:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 21:53:39 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-22 14:59:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 21:53:39 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-17 22:56:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-16 16:47:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-17 19:00:34 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-16 16:47:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-17 22:56:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-17 22:56:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-22 19:36:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-17 22:56:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-16 15:08:20 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-17 22:56:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-17 22:56:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-17 19:00:34 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-26 15:00:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-26 15:00:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-26 15:00:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-01-26 15:00:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-01-26 15:00:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-31 11:13:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-31 11:13:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-30 18:37:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-31 11:13:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-30 18:37:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-31 11:13:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-24 10:20:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-31 11:13:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-28 14:25:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-12-06 21:50:06 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-28 14:25:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-05-31 11:13:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-30 18:37:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-05-31 11:13:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-30 18:37:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-05-31 11:13:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-22 17:03:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-22 19:36:58 +01:00
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-30 22:06:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 15:37:06 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-26 19:48:42 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: retrieve: cap requested size to negotiated max_write
FUSE filesystem server and kernel client negotiate during initialization
phase, what should be the maximum write size the client will ever issue.
Correspondingly the filesystem server then queues sys_read calls to read
requests with buffer capacity large enough to carry request header + that
max_write bytes. A filesystem server is free to set its max_write in
anywhere in the range between [1*page, fc->max_pages*page]. In particular
go-fuse[2] sets max_write by default as 64K, wheres default fc->max_pages
corresponds to 128K. Libfuse also allows users to configure max_write, but
by default presets it to possible maximum.
If max_write is < fc->max_pages*page, and in NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler we
allow to retrieve more than max_write bytes, corresponding prepared
NOTIFY_REPLY will be thrown away by fuse_dev_do_read, because the
filesystem server, in full correspondence with server/client contract, will
be only queuing sys_read with ~max_write buffer capacity, and
fuse_dev_do_read throws away requests that cannot fit into server request
buffer. In turn the filesystem server could get stuck waiting indefinitely
for NOTIFY_REPLY since NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler returned OK which is
understood by clients as that NOTIFY_REPLY was queued and will be sent
back.
Cap requested size to negotiate max_write to avoid the problem. This
aligns with the way NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler works, which already
unconditionally caps requested retrieve size to fuse_conn->max_pages. This
way it should not hurt NOTIFY_RETRIEVE semantic if we return less data than
was originally requested.
Please see [1] for context where the problem of stuck filesystem was hit
for real, how the situation was traced and for more involving patch that
did not make it into the tree.
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=155057023600853&w=2
[2] https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com>
Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Cc: Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-03-27 10:15:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-26 19:48:42 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: add max_pages to init_out
Replace FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ with the configurable parameter max_pages to
improve performance.
Old RFC with detailed description of the problem and many fixes by Mitsuo
Hayasaka (mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com):
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136
We've encountered performance degradation and fixed it on a big and complex
virtual environment.
Environment to reproduce degradation and improvement:
1. Add lag to user mode FUSE
Add nanosleep(&(struct timespec){ 0, 1000 }, NULL); to xmp_write_buf in
passthrough_fh.c
2. patch UM fuse with configurable max_pages parameter. The patch will be
provided latter.
3. run test script and perform test on tmpfs
fuse_test()
{
cd /tmp
mkdir -p fusemnt
passthrough_fh -o max_pages=$1 /tmp/fusemnt
grep fuse /proc/self/mounts
dd conv=fdatasync oflag=dsync if=/dev/zero of=fusemnt/tmp/tmp \
count=1K bs=1M 2>&1 | grep -v records
rm fusemnt/tmp/tmp
killall passthrough_fh
}
Test results:
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.73867 s, 618 MB/s
passthrough_fh /tmp/fusemnt fuse.passthrough_fh \
rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,max_pages=256 0 0
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.15643 s, 928 MB/s
Obviously with bigger lag the difference between 'before' and 'after'
will be more significant.
Mitsuo Hayasaka, in 2012 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136),
observed improvement from 400-550 to 520-740.
Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2018-09-06 15:37:06 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-26 19:48:42 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2012-09-04 18:45:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-13 10:36:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-06 17:44:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-01-09 17:24:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-01-09 17:24:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-01-09 17:24:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-26 11:45:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-31 11:13:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-12 14:41:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-06 21:50:06 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-01-09 17:24:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-01-26 15:00:59 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-30 22:50:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:05 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-21 09:34:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-21 09:33:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2008-11-26 12:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-22 09:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:05 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-25 12:52:42 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2006-06-25 05:48:54 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-09-10 15:04:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-08 12:05:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 21:53:39 -04:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-22 14:59:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 21:53:39 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-15 13:30:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-17 19:00:33 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-15 13:30:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-17 19:00:33 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-17 19:00:33 +03:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-06 21:34:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-11-15 13:30:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-05 14:02:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-08-19 09:53:50 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-15 13:30:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-15 13:30:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-05 14:02:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 22:06:08 -04:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-12 02:39:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-05 14:02:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-02 11:10:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-12 02:39:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-27 10:45:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-17 19:00:34 +03:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-03 01:02:18 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-11 14:34:03 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-11 14:34:03 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-11 14:34:03 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-11 14:34:03 -08:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-06 12:15:20 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-01 16:43:52 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-14 18:48:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-24 10:40:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:01 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-10 22:54:55 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-06 10:45:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:25:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-27 18:29:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-12 12:04:04 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:12 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-05 15:50:43 -04:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs
and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock.
This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one
of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler
may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate
spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of
the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally.
Reproducer:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/aio_abi.h>
int main()
{
char opts[128];
int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR);
aio_context_t ctx = 0;
struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd };
struct iocb *cbp = &cb;
sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd);
mkdir("mnt", 0700);
mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts);
syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx);
syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp);
}
Beginning of lockdep output:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline]
000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
and this task is already holding:
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline]
0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
[...]
Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
2019-09-08 20:15:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-14 10:54:53 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2006-01-16 22:14:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-09 15:52:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-14 10:54:53 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 13:12:14 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-20 17:59:34 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-26 16:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-24 10:40:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-10 22:54:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-14 10:54:53 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-10 22:54:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-10 22:54:56 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-10 22:54:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-10 22:54:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-06 16:51:40 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-31 23:07:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-25 15:30:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-21 14:02:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-08-31 23:07:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-11 17:09:27 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-31 23:07:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-19 15:05:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-31 23:07:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-21 14:02:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-11 17:09:27 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-25 15:30:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-08-31 23:07:55 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-28 01:56:42 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-12 05:22:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 21:53:39 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 15:06:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-03 21:53:39 -04:00
|
|
|
|
fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device
Allow userspace filesystem implementation to use splice() to write to
the fuse device. The semantics of using splice() are:
1) buffer the message header and data in a temporary pipe
2) with a *single* splice() call move the message from the temporary pipe
to the fuse device
The READ reply message has the most interesting use for this, since
now the data from an arbitrary file descriptor (which could be a
regular file, a block device or a socket) can be tranferred into the
fuse device without having to go through a userspace buffer. It will
also allow zero copy moving of pages.
One caveat is that the protocol on the fuse device requires the length
of the whole message to be written into the header. But the length of
the data transferred into the temporary pipe may not be known in
advance. The current library implementation works around this by
using vmplice to write the header and modifying the header after
splicing the data into the pipe (error handling omitted):
struct fuse_out_header out;
iov.iov_base = &out;
iov.iov_len = sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
vmsplice(pip[1], &iov, 1, 0);
len = splice(input_fd, input_offset, pip[1], NULL, len, 0);
/* retrospectively modify the header: */
out.len = len + sizeof(struct fuse_out_header);
splice(pip[0], NULL, fuse_chan_fd(req->ch), NULL, out.len, flags);
This works since vmsplice only saves a pointer to the data, it does
not copy the data itself.
Since pipes are currently limited to 16 pages and messages need to be
spliced atomically, the length of the data is limited to 15 pages (or
60kB for 4k pages).
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
2010-05-25 15:06:06 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-10 22:54:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-07-01 16:26:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-11 21:59:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-04-14 10:54:53 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-07-20 10:11:58 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2005-09-09 13:10:27 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
