kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-09-26 18:16:26 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/fs/locks.c

3002 lines
79 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

treewide: Add SPDX license identifier for missed files Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which: - Have no license information of any form - Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the initial scan/conversion to ignore the file These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-19 13:08:55 +01:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: remove changelog comments This is only of historical interest, and anyone interested in the history can dig out an old version of locks.c from from git. Triggered by the observation that it references the now-removed Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.rst. Reported-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-10-19 13:38:35 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests. When we find an existing lock which conflicts with a request, and the request wants to wait, we currently add the request to a list. When the lock is removed, the whole list is woken. This can cause the thundering-herd problem. To reduce the problem, we make use of the (new) fact that a pending request can itself have a list of blocked requests. When we find a conflict, we look through the existing blocked requests. If any one of them blocks the new request, the new request is attached below that request, otherwise it is added to the list of blocked requests, which are now known to be mutually non-conflicting. This way, when the lock is released, only a set of non-conflicting locks will be woken, the rest can stay asleep. If the lock request cannot be granted and the request needs to be requeued, all the other requests it blocks will then be woken To make this more concrete: If you have a many-core machine, and have many threads all wanting to briefly lock a give file (udev is known to do this), you can get quite poor performance. When one thread releases a lock, it wakes up all other threads that are waiting (classic thundering-herd) - one will get the lock and the others go to sleep. When you have few cores, this is not very noticeable: by the time the 4th or 5th thread gets enough CPU time to try to claim the lock, the earlier threads have claimed it, done what was needed, and released. So with few cores, many of the threads don't end up contending. With 50+ cores, lost of threads can get the CPU at the same time, and the contention can easily be measured. This patchset creates a tree of pending lock requests in which siblings don't conflict and each lock request does conflict with its parent. When a lock is released, only requests which don't conflict with each other a woken. Testing shows that lock-acquisitions-per-second is now fairly stable even as the number of contending process goes to 1000. Without this patch, locks-per-second drops off steeply after a few 10s of processes. There is a small cost to this extra complexity. At 20 processes running a particular test on 72 cores, the lock acquisitions per second drops from 1.8 million to 1.4 million with this patch. For 100 processes, this patch still provides 1.4 million while without this patch there are about 700,000. Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] split linux/file.h Initial splitoff of the low-level stuff; taken to fdtable.h Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2008-04-24 07:44:08 -04:00
filelock: move file locking definitions to separate header file The file locking definitions have lived in fs.h since the dawn of time, but they are only used by a small subset of the source files that include it. Move the file locking definitions to a new header file, and add the appropriate #include directives to the source files that need them. By doing this we trim down fs.h a bit and limit the amount of rebuilding that has to be done when we make changes to the file locking APIs. Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Acked-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-20 09:15:34 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] files: fix preemption issues With the new fdtable locking rules, you have to protect fdtable with either ->file_lock or rcu_read_lock/unlock(). There are some places where we aren't doing either. This patch fixes those places. Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-16 19:28:13 -07:00
pid-namespaces-vs-locks-interaction fcntl(F_GETLK,..) can return pid of process for not current pid namespace (if process is belonged to the several namespaces). It is true also for pids in /proc/locks. So correct behavior is saving pointer to the struct pid of the process lock owner. Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Gusev <vgusev@openvz.org> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2008-01-17 00:07:08 +00:00
locks: turn the blocked_list into a hashtable Break up the blocked_list into a hashtable, using the fl_owner as a key. This speeds up searching the hash chains, which is especially significant for deadlock detection. Note that the initial implementation assumes that hashing on fl_owner is sufficient. In most cases it should be, with the notable exception being server-side lockd, which compares ownership using a tuple of the nlm_host and the pid sent in the lock request. So, this may degrade to a single hash bucket when you only have a single NFS client. That will be addressed in a later patch. The careful observer may note that this patch leaves the file_lock_list alone. There's much less of a case for turning the file_lock_list into a hashtable. The only user of that list is the code that generates /proc/locks, and it always walks the entire list. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:18 -04:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
fs: move locking sysctls where they are used kernel/sysctl.c is a kitchen sink where everyone leaves their dirty dishes, this makes it very difficult to maintain. To help with this maintenance let's start by moving sysctls to places where they actually belong. The proc sysctl maintainers do not want to know what sysctl knobs you wish to add for your own piece of code, we just care about the core logic. The locking fs sysctls are only used on fs/locks.c, so move them there. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211129205548.605569-7-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Lukas Middendorf <kernel@tuxforce.de> Cc: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org> Cc: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-01-21 22:13:10 -08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add some tracepoints in the lease handling code v2: add a __break_lease tracepoint for non-blocking case Recently, I needed these to help track down a softlockup when recalling a delegation, but they might be helpful in other situations as well. Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
Replace <asm/uaccess.h> with <linux/uaccess.h> globally This was entirely automated, using the script by Al: PATT='^[[:blank:]]*#[[:blank:]]*include[[:blank:]]*<asm/uaccess.h>' sed -i -e "s!$PATT!#include <linux/uaccess.h>!" \ $(git grep -l "$PATT"|grep -v ^include/linux/uaccess.h) to do the replacement at the end of the merge window. Requested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-12-24 11:46:01 -08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Convert __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks to take a struct file_lock_core pointer. While we could do this in another way, we're going to need to add a file_lock() helper function later anyway, so introduce and use it now. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-24-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:05 -05:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: minor lease cleanup Use a helper function, to simplify upcoming changes. Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 20:10:51 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: minor lease cleanup Use a helper function, to simplify upcoming changes. Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 20:10:51 -04:00
fs: move locking sysctls where they are used kernel/sysctl.c is a kitchen sink where everyone leaves their dirty dishes, this makes it very difficult to maintain. To help with this maintenance let's start by moving sysctls to places where they actually belong. The proc sysctl maintainers do not want to know what sysctl knobs you wish to add for your own piece of code, we just care about the core logic. The locking fs sysctls are only used on fs/locks.c, so move them there. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211129205548.605569-7-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Lukas Middendorf <kernel@tuxforce.de> Cc: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org> Cc: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-01-21 22:13:10 -08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_global with a percpu-rwsem Replace the global part of the lglock with a percpu-rwsem. Since fcl_lock is a spinlock and itself nests under i_lock, which too is a spinlock we cannot acquire sleeping locks at locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks(). We can however wrap all fcl_lock acquisitions with percpu_down_read such that all invocations of locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks() have that read lock held. This allows us to replace the lg_global part of the lglock with the write side of the rwsem. In the absense of writers, percpu_{down,up}_read() are free of atomic instructions. This further avoids the very long preempt-disable regions caused by lglock on larger machines. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:33 +02:00
locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers. Also ensure that locks and requests are always put on global lists last (after fully initializing them) and are taken off before unintializing them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:14 -04:00
nfsd: convert fi_deleg_file and ls_file fields to nfsd_file Have them keep an nfsd_file reference instead of a struct file. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2019-08-18 14:18:53 -04:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: turn the blocked_list into a hashtable Break up the blocked_list into a hashtable, using the fl_owner as a key. This speeds up searching the hash chains, which is especially significant for deadlock detection. Note that the initial implementation assumes that hashing on fl_owner is sufficient. In most cases it should be, with the notable exception being server-side lockd, which compares ownership using a tuple of the nlm_host and the pid sent in the lock request. So, this may degrade to a single hash bucket when you only have a single NFS client. That will be addressed in a later patch. The careful observer may note that this patch leaves the file_lock_list alone. There's much less of a case for turning the file_lock_list into a hashtable. The only user of that list is the code that generates /proc/locks, and it always walks the entire list. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:18 -04:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
locks: turn the blocked_list into a hashtable Break up the blocked_list into a hashtable, using the fl_owner as a key. This speeds up searching the hash chains, which is especially significant for deadlock detection. Note that the initial implementation assumes that hashing on fl_owner is sufficient. In most cases it should be, with the notable exception being server-side lockd, which compares ownership using a tuple of the nlm_host and the pid sent in the lock request. So, this may degrade to a single hash bucket when you only have a single NFS client. That will be addressed in a later patch. The careful observer may note that this patch leaves the file_lock_list alone. There's much less of a case for turning the file_lock_list into a hashtable. The only user of that list is the code that generates /proc/locks, and it always walks the entire list. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:18 -04:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: turn the blocked_list into a hashtable Break up the blocked_list into a hashtable, using the fl_owner as a key. This speeds up searching the hash chains, which is especially significant for deadlock detection. Note that the initial implementation assumes that hashing on fl_owner is sufficient. In most cases it should be, with the notable exception being server-side lockd, which compares ownership using a tuple of the nlm_host and the pid sent in the lock request. So, this may degrade to a single hash bucket when you only have a single NFS client. That will be addressed in a later patch. The careful observer may note that this patch leaves the file_lock_list alone. There's much less of a case for turning the file_lock_list into a hashtable. The only user of that list is the code that generates /proc/locks, and it always walks the entire list. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:18 -04:00
locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers. Also ensure that locks and requests are always put on global lists last (after fully initializing them) and are taken off before unintializing them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:14 -04:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
fs/locks: rename some lists and pointers. struct file lock contains an 'fl_next' pointer which is used to point to the lock that this request is blocked waiting for. So rename it to fl_blocker. The fl_blocked list_head in an active lock is the head of a list of blocked requests. In a request it is a node in that list. These are two distinct uses, so replace with two list_heads with different names. fl_blocked_requests is the head of a list of blocked requests fl_blocked_member is a node in a member of that list. The two different list_heads are never used at the same time, but that will change in a future patch. Note that a tracepoint is changed to report fl_blocker instead of fl_next. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
treewide: mark stuff as __ro_after_init __read_mostly predates __ro_after_init. Many variables which are marked __read_mostly should have been __ro_after_init from day 1. Also, mark some stuff as "const" and "__init" while I'm at it. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: revert sysctl_nr_open_min, sysctl_nr_open_max changes due to arm warning] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4f6bb9c0-abba-4ee4-a7aa-89265e886817@p183 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-11 19:55:00 +03:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
locks: don't allocate a lock context for an F_UNLCK request In the event that we get an F_UNLCK request on an inode that has no lock context, there is no reason to allocate one. Change locks_get_lock_context to take a "type" pointer and avoid allocating a new context if it's F_UNLCK. Then, fix the callers to return appropriately if that function returns NULL. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-04-03 09:04:03 -04:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
filelock: add a new locks_inode_context accessor function There are a number of places in the kernel that are accessing the inode->i_flctx field without smp_load_acquire. This is required to ensure that the caller doesn't see a partially-initialized structure. Add a new accessor function for it to make this clear and convert all of the relevant accesses in locks.c to use it. Also, convert locks_free_lock_context to use the helper as well instead of just doing a "bare" assignment. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-16 09:02:30 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
filelock: add a new locks_inode_context accessor function There are a number of places in the kernel that are accessing the inode->i_flctx field without smp_load_acquire. This is required to ensure that the caller doesn't see a partially-initialized structure. Add a new accessor function for it to make this clear and convert all of the relevant accesses in locks.c to use it. Also, convert locks_free_lock_context to use the helper as well instead of just doing a "bare" assignment. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-16 09:02:30 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
locks: sprinkle some tracepoints around the file locking code Add some tracepoints around the POSIX locking code. These were useful when tracking down problems when handling the race between setlk and close. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-06 21:26:10 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
locks: prink more detail when there are leaked locks Right now, we just get WARN_ON_ONCE, which is not particularly helpful. Have it dump some info about the locks and the inode to make it easier to track down leaked locks in the future. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-06 21:28:41 -05:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
locks: prink more detail when there are leaked locks Right now, we just get WARN_ON_ONCE, which is not particularly helpful. Have it dump some info about the locks and the inode to make it easier to track down leaked locks in the future. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-06 21:28:41 -05:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
locks: prink more detail when there are leaked locks Right now, we just get WARN_ON_ONCE, which is not particularly helpful. Have it dump some info about the locks and the inode to make it easier to track down leaked locks in the future. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-06 21:28:41 -05:00
locks: restore a warn for leaked locks on close When locks.c moved to using file_lock_context, the check for any locks that were not released was moved from the __fput() to destroy_inode() path in commit 8634b51f6ca2 ("locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context"). This warning has been quite useful for catching bugs, particularly in NFS where lock handling still sees some churn. Let's bring back the warning for leaked locks on __fput, as this warning is much more likely to be seen and reported by users. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-21 13:36:25 -04:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
locks: restore a warn for leaked locks on close When locks.c moved to using file_lock_context, the check for any locks that were not released was moved from the __fput() to destroy_inode() path in commit 8634b51f6ca2 ("locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context"). This warning has been quite useful for catching bugs, particularly in NFS where lock handling still sees some churn. Let's bring back the warning for leaked locks on __fput, as this warning is much more likely to be seen and reported by users. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-21 13:36:25 -04:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
locks: restore a warn for leaked locks on close When locks.c moved to using file_lock_context, the check for any locks that were not released was moved from the __fput() to destroy_inode() path in commit 8634b51f6ca2 ("locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context"). This warning has been quite useful for catching bugs, particularly in NFS where lock handling still sees some churn. Let's bring back the warning for leaked locks on __fput, as this warning is much more likely to be seen and reported by users. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-21 13:36:25 -04:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
locks: restore a warn for leaked locks on close When locks.c moved to using file_lock_context, the check for any locks that were not released was moved from the __fput() to destroy_inode() path in commit 8634b51f6ca2 ("locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context"). This warning has been quite useful for catching bugs, particularly in NFS where lock handling still sees some churn. Let's bring back the warning for leaked locks on __fput, as this warning is much more likely to be seen and reported by users. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-21 13:36:25 -04:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
locks: restore a warn for leaked locks on close When locks.c moved to using file_lock_context, the check for any locks that were not released was moved from the __fput() to destroy_inode() path in commit 8634b51f6ca2 ("locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context"). This warning has been quite useful for catching bugs, particularly in NFS where lock handling still sees some churn. Let's bring back the warning for leaked locks on __fput, as this warning is much more likely to be seen and reported by users. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-21 13:36:25 -04:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
locks: pass inode pointer to locks_free_lock_context ...so we can print information about it if there are leaked locks. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-07 15:08:51 -05:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
filelock: add a new locks_inode_context accessor function There are a number of places in the kernel that are accessing the inode->i_flctx field without smp_load_acquire. This is required to ensure that the caller doesn't see a partially-initialized structure. Add a new accessor function for it to make this clear and convert all of the relevant accesses in locks.c to use it. Also, convert locks_free_lock_context to use the helper as well instead of just doing a "bare" assignment. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-16 09:02:30 -05:00
locks: pass inode pointer to locks_free_lock_context ...so we can print information about it if there are leaked locks. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-07 15:08:51 -05:00
locks: prink more detail when there are leaked locks Right now, we just get WARN_ON_ONCE, which is not particularly helpful. Have it dump some info about the locks and the inode to make it easier to track down leaked locks in the future. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-06 21:28:41 -05:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs: fix lock initialization locks_alloc_lock() assumed that the allocated struct file_lock is already initialized to zero members. This is only true for the first allocation of the structure, after reuse some of the members will have random values. This will for example result in passing random fl_start values to userspace in fuse for FL_FLOCK locks, which is an information leak at best. Fix by reinitializing those members which may be non-zero after freeing. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> CC: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-07-06 12:33:55 +02:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs: fix lock initialization locks_alloc_lock() assumed that the allocated struct file_lock is already initialized to zero members. This is only true for the first allocation of the structure, after reuse some of the members will have random values. This will for example result in passing random fl_start values to userspace in fuse for FL_FLOCK locks, which is an information leak at best. Fix by reinitializing those members which may be non-zero after freeing. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> CC: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-07-06 12:33:55 +02:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks/nfsd: allocate file lock outside of spinlock As suggested by Christoph Hellwig, this moves allocation of new file locks out of generic_setlease into the callers, nfs4_open_delegation and fcntl_setlease in order to allow GFP_KERNEL allocations when lock_flocks has become a spinlock. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2010-10-27 15:46:08 +02:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs: locks: remove init_once From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Remove SLAB initialization entirely, as suggested by Bruce and Linus. Allocate with __GFP_ZERO instead and only initialize list heads. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-07 13:06:09 +02:00
fs: fix lock initialization locks_alloc_lock() assumed that the allocated struct file_lock is already initialized to zero members. This is only true for the first allocation of the structure, after reuse some of the members will have random values. This will for example result in passing random fl_start values to userspace in fuse for FL_FLOCK locks, which is an information leak at best. Fix by reinitializing those members which may be non-zero after freeing. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> CC: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-07-06 12:33:55 +02:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs: fix lock initialization locks_alloc_lock() assumed that the allocated struct file_lock is already initialized to zero members. This is only true for the first allocation of the structure, after reuse some of the members will have random values. This will for example result in passing random fl_start values to userspace in fuse for FL_FLOCK locks, which is an information leak at best. Fix by reinitializing those members which may be non-zero after freeing. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> CC: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-07-06 12:33:55 +02:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks/nfsd: allocate file lock outside of spinlock As suggested by Christoph Hellwig, this moves allocation of new file locks out of generic_setlease into the callers, nfs4_open_delegation and fcntl_setlease in order to allow GFP_KERNEL allocations when lock_flocks has become a spinlock. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2010-10-27 15:46:08 +02:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
lockd: call locks_release_private to cleanup per-filesystem state For every lock request lockd creates a new file_lock object in nlmsvc_setgrantargs() by copying the passed in file_lock with locks_copy_lock(). A filesystem can attach it's own lock_operations vector to the file_lock. It has to be cleaned up at the end of the file_lock's life. However, lockd doesn't do it today, yet it asserts in nlmclnt_release_lockargs() that the per-filesystem state is clean. This patch fixes it by exporting locks_release_private() and adding it to nlmsvc_freegrantargs(), to be symmetrical to creating a file_lock in nlmsvc_setgrantargs(). Signed-off-by: Felix Blyakher <felixb@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2009-03-31 15:12:56 -05:00
VFS: Fix __posix_lock_file() copy of private lock area The struct file_lock->fl_u area must be copied using the fl_copy_lock() operation. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20 13:44:05 -05:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
locks: move checks from locks_free_lock() to locks_release_private() Code that allocates locks using locks_alloc_lock() will free it using locks_free_lock(), and will benefit from the BUG_ON() consistency checks therein. However some code (nfsd and lockd) allocate a lock embedded in some other data structure, and so free the lock themselves after calling locks_release_private(). This path does not benefit from the consistency checks. To help catch future errors, move the BUG_ON() checks to locks_release_private() - which locks_free_lock() already calls. This ensures that all users for locks will find out if the lock isn't detached properly before being free. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2019-04-24 12:00:08 +10:00
VFS: Fix __posix_lock_file() copy of private lock area The struct file_lock->fl_u area must be copied using the fl_copy_lock() operation. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20 13:44:05 -05:00
locks: New ops in lock_manager_operations for get/put owner NFSD or other lockmanager may increase the owner's reference, so adds two new options for copying and releasing owner. v5: change order from 2/6 to 3/6 v4: rename lm_copy_owner/lm_release_owner to lm_get_owner/lm_put_owner Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:43 -04:00
locks: change lm_get_owner and lm_put_owner prototypes The current prototypes for these operations are somewhat awkward as they deal with fl_owners but take struct file_lock arguments. In the future, we'll want to be able to take references without necessarily dealing with a struct file_lock. Change them to take fl_owner_t arguments instead and have the callers deal with assigning the values to the file_lock structs. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-04-03 09:04:04 -04:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
locks: change lm_get_owner and lm_put_owner prototypes The current prototypes for these operations are somewhat awkward as they deal with fl_owners but take struct file_lock arguments. In the future, we'll want to be able to take references without necessarily dealing with a struct file_lock. Change them to take fl_owner_t arguments instead and have the callers deal with assigning the values to the file_lock structs. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-04-03 09:04:04 -04:00
locks: New ops in lock_manager_operations for get/put owner NFSD or other lockmanager may increase the owner's reference, so adds two new options for copying and releasing owner. v5: change order from 2/6 to 3/6 v4: rename lm_copy_owner/lm_release_owner to lm_get_owner/lm_put_owner Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:43 -04:00
VFS: Fix __posix_lock_file() copy of private lock area The struct file_lock->fl_u area must be copied using the fl_copy_lock() operation. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20 13:44:05 -05:00
lockd: call locks_release_private to cleanup per-filesystem state For every lock request lockd creates a new file_lock object in nlmsvc_setgrantargs() by copying the passed in file_lock with locks_copy_lock(). A filesystem can attach it's own lock_operations vector to the file_lock. It has to be cleaned up at the end of the file_lock's life. However, lockd doesn't do it today, yet it asserts in nlmclnt_release_lockargs() that the per-filesystem state is clean. This patch fixes it by exporting locks_release_private() and adding it to nlmsvc_freegrantargs(), to be symmetrical to creating a file_lock in nlmsvc_setgrantargs(). Signed-off-by: Felix Blyakher <felixb@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2009-03-31 15:12:56 -05:00
VFS: Fix __posix_lock_file() copy of private lock area The struct file_lock->fl_u area must be copied using the fl_copy_lock() operation. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20 13:44:05 -05:00
fs/lock: add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check for blockers Add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check if there is any blockers for a given lockowner. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:24 -07:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
fs/lock: add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check for blockers Add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check if there is any blockers for a given lockowner. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:24 -07:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
fs/lock: add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check for blockers Add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check if there is any blockers for a given lockowner. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:24 -07:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
fs/lock: add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check for blockers Add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check if there is any blockers for a given lockowner. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:24 -07:00
filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Convert more internal fs/locks.c functions to take and deal with struct file_lock_core instead of struct file_lock: - locks_dump_ctx_list - locks_check_ctx_file_list - locks_release_private - locks_owner_has_blockers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-19-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:00 -05:00
fs/lock: add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check for blockers Add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check if there is any blockers for a given lockowner. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:24 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix setlease methods to free passed-in lock We modified setlease to require the caller to allocate the new lease in the case of creating a new lease, but forgot to fix up the filesystem methods. Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-10-30 17:31:15 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
VFS: Fix __posix_lock_file() copy of private lock area The struct file_lock->fl_u area must be copied using the fl_copy_lock() operation. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20 13:44:05 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix setlease methods to free passed-in lock We modified setlease to require the caller to allocate the new lease in the case of creating a new lease, but forgot to fix up the filesystem methods. Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-10-30 17:31:15 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: defer freeing locks in locks_delete_lock until after i_lock has been dropped In commit 72f98e72551fa (locks: turn lock_flocks into a spinlock), we moved from using the BKL to a global spinlock. With this change, we lost the ability to block in the fl_release_private operation. This is problematic for NFS (and probably some other filesystems as well). Add a new list_head argument to locks_delete_lock. If that argument is non-NULL, then queue any locks that we want to free to the list instead of freeing them. Then, add a new locks_dispose_list function that will walk such a list and call locks_free_lock on them after the i_lock has been dropped. Finally, change all of the callers of locks_delete_lock to pass in a list_head, except for lease_modify. That function can be called long after the i_lock has been acquired. Deferring the freeing of a lease after unlocking it in that function is non-trivial until we overhaul some of the spinlocking in the lease code. Currently though, no filesystem that sets fl_release_private supports leases, so this is not currently a problem. We'll eventually want to make the same change in the lease code, but it needs a lot more work before we can reasonably do so. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 14:20:31 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: defer freeing locks in locks_delete_lock until after i_lock has been dropped In commit 72f98e72551fa (locks: turn lock_flocks into a spinlock), we moved from using the BKL to a global spinlock. With this change, we lost the ability to block in the fl_release_private operation. This is problematic for NFS (and probably some other filesystems as well). Add a new list_head argument to locks_delete_lock. If that argument is non-NULL, then queue any locks that we want to free to the list instead of freeing them. Then, add a new locks_dispose_list function that will walk such a list and call locks_free_lock on them after the i_lock has been dropped. Finally, change all of the callers of locks_delete_lock to pass in a list_head, except for lease_modify. That function can be called long after the i_lock has been acquired. Deferring the freeing of a lease after unlocking it in that function is non-trivial until we overhaul some of the spinlocking in the lease code. Currently though, no filesystem that sets fl_release_private supports leases, so this is not currently a problem. We'll eventually want to make the same change in the lease code, but it needs a lot more work before we can reasonably do so. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 14:20:31 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: defer freeing locks in locks_delete_lock until after i_lock has been dropped In commit 72f98e72551fa (locks: turn lock_flocks into a spinlock), we moved from using the BKL to a global spinlock. With this change, we lost the ability to block in the fl_release_private operation. This is problematic for NFS (and probably some other filesystems as well). Add a new list_head argument to locks_delete_lock. If that argument is non-NULL, then queue any locks that we want to free to the list instead of freeing them. Then, add a new locks_dispose_list function that will walk such a list and call locks_free_lock on them after the i_lock has been dropped. Finally, change all of the callers of locks_delete_lock to pass in a list_head, except for lease_modify. That function can be called long after the i_lock has been acquired. Deferring the freeing of a lease after unlocking it in that function is non-trivial until we overhaul some of the spinlocking in the lease code. Currently though, no filesystem that sets fl_release_private supports leases, so this is not currently a problem. We'll eventually want to make the same change in the lease code, but it needs a lot more work before we can reasonably do so. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 14:20:31 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs: locks: remove init_once From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Remove SLAB initialization entirely, as suggested by Bruce and Linus. Allocate with __GFP_ZERO instead and only initialize list heads. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-07 13:06:09 +02:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: Rename __locks_copy_lock() to locks_copy_conflock() Jeff advice, " Right now __locks_copy_lock is only used to copy conflocks. It would be good to rename that to something more distinct (i.e.locks_copy_conflock), to make it clear that we're generating a conflock there." v5: change order from 3/6 to 2/6 v4: new patch only renaming function name Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:42 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: Copy fl_lmops information for conflock in locks_copy_conflock() Commit d5b9026a67 ([PATCH] knfsd: locks: flag NFSv4-owned locks) using fl_lmops field in file_lock for checking nfsd4 lockowner. But, commit 1a747ee0cc (locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return of conflicting locks) causes the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL. Also, commit 0996905f93 (lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock()) caused the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL too. Make sure copy the private information by fl_copy_lock() in struct file_lock_operations, merge __locks_copy_lock() to fl_copy_lock(). Jeff advice, "Set fl_lmops on conflocks, but don't set fl_ops. fl_ops are superfluous, since they are callbacks into the filesystem. There should be no need to bother the filesystem at all with info in a conflock. But, lock _ownership_ matters for conflocks and that's indicated by the fl_lmops. So you really do want to copy the fl_lmops for conflocks I think." v5: add missing calling of locks_release_private() in nlmsvc_testlock() v4: only copy fl_lmops for conflock, don't copy fl_ops Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:43 -04:00
lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock() The caller of posix_test_lock() should never need to look at the lock private data, so do not copy that information. This also means that there is no need to call the fl_release_private methods. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20 13:44:38 -05:00
locks: Copy fl_lmops information for conflock in locks_copy_conflock() Commit d5b9026a67 ([PATCH] knfsd: locks: flag NFSv4-owned locks) using fl_lmops field in file_lock for checking nfsd4 lockowner. But, commit 1a747ee0cc (locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return of conflicting locks) causes the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL. Also, commit 0996905f93 (lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock()) caused the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL too. Make sure copy the private information by fl_copy_lock() in struct file_lock_operations, merge __locks_copy_lock() to fl_copy_lock(). Jeff advice, "Set fl_lmops on conflocks, but don't set fl_ops. fl_ops are superfluous, since they are callbacks into the filesystem. There should be no need to bother the filesystem at all with info in a conflock. But, lock _ownership_ matters for conflocks and that's indicated by the fl_lmops. So you really do want to copy the fl_lmops for conflocks I think." v5: add missing calling of locks_release_private() in nlmsvc_testlock() v4: only copy fl_lmops for conflock, don't copy fl_ops Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:43 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: Copy fl_lmops information for conflock in locks_copy_conflock() Commit d5b9026a67 ([PATCH] knfsd: locks: flag NFSv4-owned locks) using fl_lmops field in file_lock for checking nfsd4 lockowner. But, commit 1a747ee0cc (locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return of conflicting locks) causes the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL. Also, commit 0996905f93 (lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock()) caused the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL too. Make sure copy the private information by fl_copy_lock() in struct file_lock_operations, merge __locks_copy_lock() to fl_copy_lock(). Jeff advice, "Set fl_lmops on conflocks, but don't set fl_ops. fl_ops are superfluous, since they are callbacks into the filesystem. There should be no need to bother the filesystem at all with info in a conflock. But, lock _ownership_ matters for conflocks and that's indicated by the fl_lmops. So you really do want to copy the fl_lmops for conflocks I think." v5: add missing calling of locks_release_private() in nlmsvc_testlock() v4: only copy fl_lmops for conflock, don't copy fl_ops Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:43 -04:00
lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock() The caller of posix_test_lock() should never need to look at the lock private data, so do not copy that information. This also means that there is no need to call the fl_release_private methods. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20 13:44:38 -05:00
locks: Rename __locks_copy_lock() to locks_copy_conflock() Jeff advice, " Right now __locks_copy_lock is only used to copy conflocks. It would be good to rename that to something more distinct (i.e.locks_copy_conflock), to make it clear that we're generating a conflock there." v5: change order from 3/6 to 2/6 v4: new patch only renaming function name Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:42 -04:00
lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock() The caller of posix_test_lock() should never need to look at the lock private data, so do not copy that information. This also means that there is no need to call the fl_release_private methods. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20 13:44:38 -05:00
locks: don't call locks_release_private from locks_copy_lock All callers of locks_copy_lock pass in a brand new file_lock struct, so there's no need to call locks_release_private on it. Replace that with a warning that fires in the event that we receive a target lock that doesn't look like it's properly initialized. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 14:09:35 -04:00
lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock() The caller of posix_test_lock() should never need to look at the lock private data, so do not copy that information. This also means that there is no need to call the fl_release_private methods. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20 13:44:38 -05:00
locks: Rename __locks_copy_lock() to locks_copy_conflock() Jeff advice, " Right now __locks_copy_lock is only used to copy conflocks. It would be good to rename that to something more distinct (i.e.locks_copy_conflock), to make it clear that we're generating a conflock there." v5: change order from 3/6 to 2/6 v4: new patch only renaming function name Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:42 -04:00
locks: Copy fl_lmops information for conflock in locks_copy_conflock() Commit d5b9026a67 ([PATCH] knfsd: locks: flag NFSv4-owned locks) using fl_lmops field in file_lock for checking nfsd4 lockowner. But, commit 1a747ee0cc (locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return of conflicting locks) causes the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL. Also, commit 0996905f93 (lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock()) caused the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL too. Make sure copy the private information by fl_copy_lock() in struct file_lock_operations, merge __locks_copy_lock() to fl_copy_lock(). Jeff advice, "Set fl_lmops on conflocks, but don't set fl_ops. fl_ops are superfluous, since they are callbacks into the filesystem. There should be no need to bother the filesystem at all with info in a conflock. But, lock _ownership_ matters for conflocks and that's indicated by the fl_lmops. So you really do want to copy the fl_lmops for conflocks I think." v5: add missing calling of locks_release_private() in nlmsvc_testlock() v4: only copy fl_lmops for conflock, don't copy fl_ops Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:43 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
VFS: Fix __posix_lock_file() copy of private lock area The struct file_lock->fl_u area must be copied using the fl_copy_lock() operation. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-03-20 13:44:05 -05:00
locks: Copy fl_lmops information for conflock in locks_copy_conflock() Commit d5b9026a67 ([PATCH] knfsd: locks: flag NFSv4-owned locks) using fl_lmops field in file_lock for checking nfsd4 lockowner. But, commit 1a747ee0cc (locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return of conflicting locks) causes the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL. Also, commit 0996905f93 (lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock()) caused the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL too. Make sure copy the private information by fl_copy_lock() in struct file_lock_operations, merge __locks_copy_lock() to fl_copy_lock(). Jeff advice, "Set fl_lmops on conflocks, but don't set fl_ops. fl_ops are superfluous, since they are callbacks into the filesystem. There should be no need to bother the filesystem at all with info in a conflock. But, lock _ownership_ matters for conflocks and that's indicated by the fl_lmops. So you really do want to copy the fl_lmops for conflocks I think." v5: add missing calling of locks_release_private() in nlmsvc_testlock() v4: only copy fl_lmops for conflock, don't copy fl_ops Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:43 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests. Currently, a lock can block pending requests, but all pending requests are equal. If lots of pending requests are mutually exclusive, this means they will all be woken up and all but one will fail. This can hurt performance. So we will allow pending requests to block other requests. Only the first request will be woken, and it will wake the others. This patch doesn't implement this fully, but prepares the way. - It acknowledges that a request might be blocking other requests, and when the request is converted to a lock, those blocked requests are moved across. - When a request is requeued or discarded, all blocked requests are woken. - When deadlock-detection looks for the lock which blocks a given request, we follow the chain of ->fl_blocker all the way to the top. Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: convert fl_blocker to file_lock_core Both locks and leases deal with fl_blocker. Switch the fl_blocker pointer in struct file_lock_core to point to the file_lock_core of the blocker instead of a file_lock structure. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-26-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:07 -05:00
fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests. Currently, a lock can block pending requests, but all pending requests are equal. If lots of pending requests are mutually exclusive, this means they will all be woken up and all but one will fail. This can hurt performance. So we will allow pending requests to block other requests. Only the first request will be woken, and it will wake the others. This patch doesn't implement this fully, but prepares the way. - It acknowledges that a request might be blocking other requests, and when the request is converted to a lock, those blocked requests are moved across. - When a request is requeued or discarded, all blocked requests are woken. - When deadlock-detection looks for the lock which blocks a given request, we follow the chain of ->fl_blocker all the way to the top. Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests. Currently, a lock can block pending requests, but all pending requests are equal. If lots of pending requests are mutually exclusive, this means they will all be woken up and all but one will fail. This can hurt performance. So we will allow pending requests to block other requests. Only the first request will be woken, and it will wake the others. This patch doesn't implement this fully, but prepares the way. - It acknowledges that a request might be blocking other requests, and when the request is converted to a lock, those blocked requests are moved across. - When a request is requeued or discarded, all blocked requests are woken. - When deadlock-detection looks for the lock which blocks a given request, we follow the chain of ->fl_blocker all the way to the top. Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
filelock: convert fl_blocker to file_lock_core Both locks and leases deal with fl_blocker. Switch the fl_blocker pointer in struct file_lock_core to point to the file_lock_core of the blocker instead of a file_lock structure. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-26-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:07 -05:00
fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests. Currently, a lock can block pending requests, but all pending requests are equal. If lots of pending requests are mutually exclusive, this means they will all be woken up and all but one will fail. This can hurt performance. So we will allow pending requests to block other requests. Only the first request will be woken, and it will wake the others. This patch doesn't implement this fully, but prepares the way. - It acknowledges that a request might be blocking other requests, and when the request is converted to a lock, those blocked requests are moved across. - When a request is requeued or discarded, all blocked requests are woken. - When deadlock-detection looks for the lock which blocks a given request, we follow the chain of ->fl_blocker all the way to the top. Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock(). Two functions, flock syscall and locks_remove_flock(), call flock_make_lock(). It allocates struct file_lock from slab cache if its argument fl is NULL. When we call flock syscall, we pass NULL to allocate memory for struct file_lock. However, we always free it at the end by locks_free_lock(). We need not allocate it and instead should use a local variable as locks_remove_flock() does. Also, the validation for flock_translate_cmd() is not necessary for locks_remove_flock(). So we move the part to flock syscall and make flock_make_lock() return nothing. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:31 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock(). Two functions, flock syscall and locks_remove_flock(), call flock_make_lock(). It allocates struct file_lock from slab cache if its argument fl is NULL. When we call flock syscall, we pass NULL to allocate memory for struct file_lock. However, we always free it at the end by locks_free_lock(). We need not allocate it and instead should use a local variable as locks_remove_flock() does. Also, the validation for flock_translate_cmd() is not necessary for locks_remove_flock(). So we move the part to flock syscall and make flock_make_lock() return nothing. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:31 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: make assign_type helper take a file_lock_core pointer Have assign_type take struct file_lock_core instead of file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-29-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:10 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: make assign_type helper take a file_lock_core pointer Have assign_type take struct file_lock_core instead of file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-29-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:10 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix posix lock range overflow handling In the 32-bit case fcntl assigns the 64-bit f_pos and i_size to a 32-bit off_t. The existing range checks also seem to depend on signed arithmetic wrapping when it overflows. In practice maybe that works, but we can be more careful. That also allows us to make a more reliable distinction between -EINVAL and -EOVERFLOW. Note that in the 32-bit case SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END might allow the caller to set a lock with starting point no longer representable as a 32-bit value. We could return -EOVERFLOW in such cases, but the locks code is capable of handling such ranges, so we choose to be lenient here. The only problem is that subsequent GETLK calls on such a lock will fail with EOVERFLOW. While we're here, do some cleanup including consolidating code for the flock and flock64 cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] VFS: Use SEEK_{SET, CUR, END} instead of hardcoded values VFS: Use SEEK_{SET,CUR,END} instead of hardcoded values Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net> Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-09-30 23:27:35 -07:00
locks: fix posix lock range overflow handling In the 32-bit case fcntl assigns the 64-bit f_pos and i_size to a 32-bit off_t. The existing range checks also seem to depend on signed arithmetic wrapping when it overflows. In practice maybe that works, but we can be more careful. That also allows us to make a more reliable distinction between -EINVAL and -EOVERFLOW. Note that in the 32-bit case SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END might allow the caller to set a lock with starting point no longer representable as a 32-bit value. We could return -EOVERFLOW in such cases, but the locks code is capable of handling such ranges, so we choose to be lenient here. The only problem is that subsequent GETLK calls on such a lock will fail with EOVERFLOW. While we're here, do some cleanup including consolidating code for the flock and flock64 cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] VFS: Use SEEK_{SET, CUR, END} instead of hardcoded values VFS: Use SEEK_{SET,CUR,END} instead of hardcoded values Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net> Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-09-30 23:27:35 -07:00
locks: fix posix lock range overflow handling In the 32-bit case fcntl assigns the 64-bit f_pos and i_size to a 32-bit off_t. The existing range checks also seem to depend on signed arithmetic wrapping when it overflows. In practice maybe that works, but we can be more careful. That also allows us to make a more reliable distinction between -EINVAL and -EOVERFLOW. Note that in the 32-bit case SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END might allow the caller to set a lock with starting point no longer representable as a 32-bit value. We could return -EOVERFLOW in such cases, but the locks code is capable of handling such ranges, so we choose to be lenient here. The only problem is that subsequent GETLK calls on such a lock will fail with EOVERFLOW. While we're here, do some cleanup including consolidating code for the flock and flock64 cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] VFS: Use SEEK_{SET, CUR, END} instead of hardcoded values VFS: Use SEEK_{SET,CUR,END} instead of hardcoded values Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net> Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-09-30 23:27:35 -07:00
locks: fix posix lock range overflow handling In the 32-bit case fcntl assigns the 64-bit f_pos and i_size to a 32-bit off_t. The existing range checks also seem to depend on signed arithmetic wrapping when it overflows. In practice maybe that works, but we can be more careful. That also allows us to make a more reliable distinction between -EINVAL and -EOVERFLOW. Note that in the 32-bit case SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END might allow the caller to set a lock with starting point no longer representable as a 32-bit value. We could return -EOVERFLOW in such cases, but the locks code is capable of handling such ranges, so we choose to be lenient here. The only problem is that subsequent GETLK calls on such a lock will fail with EOVERFLOW. While we're here, do some cleanup including consolidating code for the flock and flock64 cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix posix lock range overflow handling In the 32-bit case fcntl assigns the 64-bit f_pos and i_size to a 32-bit off_t. The existing range checks also seem to depend on signed arithmetic wrapping when it overflows. In practice maybe that works, but we can be more careful. That also allows us to make a more reliable distinction between -EINVAL and -EOVERFLOW. Note that in the 32-bit case SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END might allow the caller to set a lock with starting point no longer representable as a 32-bit value. We could return -EOVERFLOW in such cases, but the locks code is capable of handling such ranges, so we choose to be lenient here. The only problem is that subsequent GETLK calls on such a lock will fail with EOVERFLOW. While we're here, do some cleanup including consolidating code for the flock and flock64 cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
Fix Connectathon locking test failure We currently fail Connectathon test 6.10 in the case of 32-bit locks due to incorrect error checking. Also add support for l->l_len < 0 to 64-bit locks. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2005-10-18 14:20:21 -07:00
locks: fix posix lock range overflow handling In the 32-bit case fcntl assigns the 64-bit f_pos and i_size to a 32-bit off_t. The existing range checks also seem to depend on signed arithmetic wrapping when it overflows. In practice maybe that works, but we can be more careful. That also allows us to make a more reliable distinction between -EINVAL and -EOVERFLOW. Note that in the 32-bit case SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END might allow the caller to set a lock with starting point no longer representable as a 32-bit value. We could return -EOVERFLOW in such cases, but the locks code is capable of handling such ranges, so we choose to be lenient here. The only problem is that subsequent GETLK calls on such a lock will fail with EOVERFLOW. While we're here, do some cleanup including consolidating code for the flock and flock64 cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
locks: Fix UBSAN undefined behaviour in flock64_to_posix_lock When the sum of fl->fl_start and l->l_len overflows, UBSAN shows the following warning: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/locks.c:482:29 signed integer overflow: 2 + 9223372036854775806 cannot be represented in type 'long long int' Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0xe4/0x14e lib/dump_stack.c:118 ubsan_epilogue+0xe/0x81 lib/ubsan.c:161 handle_overflow+0x193/0x1e2 lib/ubsan.c:192 flock64_to_posix_lock fs/locks.c:482 [inline] flock_to_posix_lock+0x595/0x690 fs/locks.c:515 fcntl_setlk+0xf3/0xa90 fs/locks.c:2262 do_fcntl+0x456/0xf60 fs/fcntl.c:387 __do_sys_fcntl fs/fcntl.c:483 [inline] __se_sys_fcntl fs/fcntl.c:468 [inline] __x64_sys_fcntl+0x12d/0x180 fs/fcntl.c:468 do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x5a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Fix it by parenthesizing 'l->l_len - 1'. Signed-off-by: Luo Meng <luomeng12@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2020-10-23 14:20:05 +08:00
locks: fix posix lock range overflow handling In the 32-bit case fcntl assigns the 64-bit f_pos and i_size to a 32-bit off_t. The existing range checks also seem to depend on signed arithmetic wrapping when it overflows. In practice maybe that works, but we can be more careful. That also allows us to make a more reliable distinction between -EINVAL and -EOVERFLOW. Note that in the 32-bit case SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END might allow the caller to set a lock with starting point no longer representable as a 32-bit value. We could return -EOVERFLOW in such cases, but the locks code is capable of handling such ranges, so we choose to be lenient here. The only problem is that subsequent GETLK calls on such a lock will fail with EOVERFLOW. While we're here, do some cleanup including consolidating code for the flock and flock64 cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
Fix Connectathon locking test failure We currently fail Connectathon test 6.10 in the case of 32-bit locks due to incorrect error checking. Also add support for l->l_len < 0 to 64-bit locks. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2005-10-18 14:20:21 -07:00
locks: fix posix lock range overflow handling In the 32-bit case fcntl assigns the 64-bit f_pos and i_size to a 32-bit off_t. The existing range checks also seem to depend on signed arithmetic wrapping when it overflows. In practice maybe that works, but we can be more careful. That also allows us to make a more reliable distinction between -EINVAL and -EOVERFLOW. Note that in the 32-bit case SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END might allow the caller to set a lock with starting point no longer representable as a 32-bit value. We could return -EOVERFLOW in such cases, but the locks code is capable of handling such ranges, so we choose to be lenient here. The only problem is that subsequent GETLK calls on such a lock will fail with EOVERFLOW. While we're here, do some cleanup including consolidating code for the flock and flock64 cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
Fix Connectathon locking test failure We currently fail Connectathon test 6.10 in the case of 32-bit locks due to incorrect error checking. Also add support for l->l_len < 0 to 64-bit locks. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2005-10-18 14:20:21 -07:00
locks: fix posix lock range overflow handling In the 32-bit case fcntl assigns the 64-bit f_pos and i_size to a 32-bit off_t. The existing range checks also seem to depend on signed arithmetic wrapping when it overflows. In practice maybe that works, but we can be more careful. That also allows us to make a more reliable distinction between -EINVAL and -EOVERFLOW. Note that in the 32-bit case SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END might allow the caller to set a lock with starting point no longer representable as a 32-bit value. We could return -EOVERFLOW in such cases, but the locks code is capable of handling such ranges, so we choose to be lenient here. The only problem is that subsequent GETLK calls on such a lock will fail with EOVERFLOW. While we're here, do some cleanup including consolidating code for the flock and flock64 cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: make assign_type helper take a file_lock_core pointer Have assign_type take struct file_lock_core instead of file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-29-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:10 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix posix lock range overflow handling In the 32-bit case fcntl assigns the 64-bit f_pos and i_size to a 32-bit off_t. The existing range checks also seem to depend on signed arithmetic wrapping when it overflows. In practice maybe that works, but we can be more careful. That also allows us to make a more reliable distinction between -EINVAL and -EOVERFLOW. Note that in the 32-bit case SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END might allow the caller to set a lock with starting point no longer representable as a 32-bit value. We could return -EOVERFLOW in such cases, but the locks code is capable of handling such ranges, so we choose to be lenient here. The only problem is that subsequent GETLK calls on such a lock will fail with EOVERFLOW. While we're here, do some cleanup including consolidating code for the flock and flock64 cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix posix lock range overflow handling In the 32-bit case fcntl assigns the 64-bit f_pos and i_size to a 32-bit off_t. The existing range checks also seem to depend on signed arithmetic wrapping when it overflows. In practice maybe that works, but we can be more careful. That also allows us to make a more reliable distinction between -EINVAL and -EOVERFLOW. Note that in the 32-bit case SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END might allow the caller to set a lock with starting point no longer representable as a 32-bit value. We could return -EOVERFLOW in such cases, but the locks code is capable of handling such ranges, so we choose to be lenient here. The only problem is that subsequent GETLK calls on such a lock will fail with EOVERFLOW. While we're here, do some cleanup including consolidating code for the flock and flock64 cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: give lm_break a return value Christoph suggests: "Add a return value to lm_break so that the lock manager can tell the core code "you can delete this lease right now". That gets rid of the games with the timeout which require all kinds of race avoidance code in the users." Do that here and have the nfsd lease break routine use it when it detects that there was a race between setting up the lease and it being broken. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 15:06:54 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: give lm_break a return value Christoph suggests: "Add a return value to lm_break so that the lock manager can tell the core code "you can delete this lease right now". That gets rid of the games with the timeout which require all kinds of race avoidance code in the users." Do that here and have the nfsd lease break routine use it when it detects that there was a race between setting up the lease and it being broken. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 15:06:54 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
signal: Use PIDTYPE_TGID to clearly store where file signals will be sent When f_setown is called a pid and a pid type are stored. Replace the use of PIDTYPE_PID with PIDTYPE_TGID as PIDTYPE_TGID goes to the entire thread group. Replace the use of PIDTYPE_MAX with PIDTYPE_PID as PIDTYPE_PID now is only for a thread. Update the users of __f_setown to use PIDTYPE_TGID instead of PIDTYPE_PID. For now the code continues to capture task_pid (when task_tgid would really be appropriate), and iterate on PIDTYPE_PID (even when type == PIDTYPE_TGID) out of an abundance of caution to preserve existing behavior. Oleg Nesterov suggested using the test to ensure we use PIDTYPE_PID for tgid lookup also be used to avoid taking the tasklist lock. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2017-07-16 22:05:57 -05:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: rename lock-manager ops Both the filesystem and the lock manager can associate operations with a lock. Confusingly, one of them (fl_release_private) actually has the same name in both operation structures. It would save some confusion to give the lock-manager ops different names. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-20 20:21:59 -04:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
treewide: Align function definition open/close braces Some functions definitions have either the initial open brace and/or the closing brace outside of column 1. Move those braces to column 1. This allows various function analyzers like gnu complexity to work properly for these modified functions. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2018-03-21 15:09:32 -07:00
filelock: make assign_type helper take a file_lock_core pointer Have assign_type take struct file_lock_core instead of file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-29-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:10 -05:00
[PATCH] fs/locks.c: Fix lease_init It is insane to be giving lease_init() the task of freeing the lock it is supposed to initialise, given that the lock is not guaranteed to be allocated on the stack. This causes lockups in fcntl_setlease(). Problem diagnosed by Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com> Also fix a slab leak in __setlease() due to an uninitialised return value. Problem diagnosed by Björn Steinbrink. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Tested-by: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-05-07 23:02:42 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
[PATCH] fs/locks.c: Fix lease_init It is insane to be giving lease_init() the task of freeing the lock it is supposed to initialise, given that the lock is not guaranteed to be allocated on the stack. This causes lockups in fcntl_setlease(). Problem diagnosed by Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com> Also fix a slab leak in __setlease() due to an uninitialised return value. Problem diagnosed by Björn Steinbrink. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Tested-by: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-05-07 23:02:42 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: clean up lease_alloc() Return the newly allocated structure as the return value instead of using a struct ** parameter. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-03-01 14:34:35 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] fs/locks.c: Fix lease_init It is insane to be giving lease_init() the task of freeing the lock it is supposed to initialise, given that the lock is not guaranteed to be allocated on the stack. This causes lockups in fcntl_setlease(). Problem diagnosed by Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com> Also fix a slab leak in __setlease() due to an uninitialised return value. Problem diagnosed by Björn Steinbrink. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Tested-by: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-05-07 23:02:42 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: clean up lease_alloc() Return the newly allocated structure as the return value instead of using a struct ** parameter. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-03-01 14:34:35 -05:00
[PATCH] fs/locks.c: Fix lease_init It is insane to be giving lease_init() the task of freeing the lock it is supposed to initialise, given that the lock is not guaranteed to be allocated on the stack. This causes lockups in fcntl_setlease(). Problem diagnosed by Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com> Also fix a slab leak in __setlease() due to an uninitialised return value. Problem diagnosed by Björn Steinbrink. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Tested-by: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-05-07 23:02:42 -04:00
locks: clean up lease_alloc() Return the newly allocated structure as the return value instead of using a struct ** parameter. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-03-01 14:34:35 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: make posix_same_owner take file_lock_core pointers Change posix_same_owner to take struct file_lock_core pointers, and convert the callers to pass those in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-20-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:01 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: make posix_same_owner take file_lock_core pointers Change posix_same_owner to take struct file_lock_core pointers, and convert the callers to pass those in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-20-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:01 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
filelock: make locks_{insert,delete}_global_locks take file_lock_core arg Convert these functions to take a file_lock_core instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-22-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:03 -05:00
locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers. Also ensure that locks and requests are always put on global lists last (after fully initializing them) and are taken off before unintializing them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:14 -04:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_global with a percpu-rwsem Replace the global part of the lglock with a percpu-rwsem. Since fcl_lock is a spinlock and itself nests under i_lock, which too is a spinlock we cannot acquire sleeping locks at locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks(). We can however wrap all fcl_lock acquisitions with percpu_down_read such that all invocations of locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks() have that read lock held. This allows us to replace the lg_global part of the lglock with the write side of the rwsem. In the absense of writers, percpu_{down,up}_read() are free of atomic instructions. This further avoids the very long preempt-disable regions caused by lglock on larger machines. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:33 +02:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
filelock: make locks_{insert,delete}_global_locks take file_lock_core arg Convert these functions to take a file_lock_core instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-22-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:03 -05:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers. Also ensure that locks and requests are always put on global lists last (after fully initializing them) and are taken off before unintializing them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:14 -04:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
filelock: make locks_{insert,delete}_global_locks take file_lock_core arg Convert these functions to take a file_lock_core instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-22-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:03 -05:00
locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers. Also ensure that locks and requests are always put on global lists last (after fully initializing them) and are taken off before unintializing them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:14 -04:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_global with a percpu-rwsem Replace the global part of the lglock with a percpu-rwsem. Since fcl_lock is a spinlock and itself nests under i_lock, which too is a spinlock we cannot acquire sleeping locks at locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks(). We can however wrap all fcl_lock acquisitions with percpu_down_read such that all invocations of locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks() have that read lock held. This allows us to replace the lg_global part of the lglock with the write side of the rwsem. In the absense of writers, percpu_{down,up}_read() are free of atomic instructions. This further avoids the very long preempt-disable regions caused by lglock on larger machines. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:33 +02:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
filelock: make locks_{insert,delete}_global_locks take file_lock_core arg Convert these functions to take a file_lock_core instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-22-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:03 -05:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
filelock: make locks_{insert,delete}_global_locks take file_lock_core arg Convert these functions to take a file_lock_core instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-22-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:03 -05:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
filelock: make locks_{insert,delete}_global_locks take file_lock_core arg Convert these functions to take a file_lock_core instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-22-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:03 -05:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers. Also ensure that locks and requests are always put on global lists last (after fully initializing them) and are taken off before unintializing them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:14 -04:00
locks: add a new "lm_owner_key" lock operation Currently, the hashing that the locking code uses to add these values to the blocked_hash is simply calculated using fl_owner field. That's valid in most cases except for server-side lockd, which validates the owner of a lock based on fl_owner and fl_pid. In the case where you have a small number of NFS clients doing a lot of locking between different processes, you could end up with all the blocked requests sitting in a very small number of hash buckets. Add a new lm_owner_key operation to the lock_manager_operations that will generate an unsigned long to use as the key in the hashtable. That function is only implemented for server-side lockd, and simply XORs the fl_owner and fl_pid. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:19 -04:00
filelock: convert posix_owner_key to take file_lock_core arg Convert posix_owner_key to take struct file_lock_core pointer, and fix up the callers to pass one in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-21-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:02 -05:00
locks: add a new "lm_owner_key" lock operation Currently, the hashing that the locking code uses to add these values to the blocked_hash is simply calculated using fl_owner field. That's valid in most cases except for server-side lockd, which validates the owner of a lock based on fl_owner and fl_pid. In the case where you have a small number of NFS clients doing a lot of locking between different processes, you could end up with all the blocked requests sitting in a very small number of hash buckets. Add a new lm_owner_key operation to the lock_manager_operations that will generate an unsigned long to use as the key in the hashtable. That function is only implemented for server-side lockd, and simply XORs the fl_owner and fl_pid. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:19 -04:00
filelock: convert posix_owner_key to take file_lock_core arg Convert posix_owner_key to take struct file_lock_core pointer, and fix up the callers to pass one in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-21-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:02 -05:00
locks: add a new "lm_owner_key" lock operation Currently, the hashing that the locking code uses to add these values to the blocked_hash is simply calculated using fl_owner field. That's valid in most cases except for server-side lockd, which validates the owner of a lock based on fl_owner and fl_pid. In the case where you have a small number of NFS clients doing a lot of locking between different processes, you could end up with all the blocked requests sitting in a very small number of hash buckets. Add a new lm_owner_key operation to the lock_manager_operations that will generate an unsigned long to use as the key in the hashtable. That function is only implemented for server-side lockd, and simply XORs the fl_owner and fl_pid. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:19 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_{insert,delete}_global_blocked Have locks_insert_global_blocked and locks_delete_global_blocked take a struct file_lock_core pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-23-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:04 -05:00
locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers. Also ensure that locks and requests are always put on global lists last (after fully initializing them) and are taken off before unintializing them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:14 -04:00
locks: Add lockdep assertion for blocked_lock_lock Annonate insert, remove and iterate function that we need blocked_lock_lock held. Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-04-03 09:04:03 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_{insert,delete}_global_blocked Have locks_insert_global_blocked and locks_delete_global_blocked take a struct file_lock_core pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-23-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:04 -05:00
locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers. Also ensure that locks and requests are always put on global lists last (after fully initializing them) and are taken off before unintializing them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:14 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_{insert,delete}_global_blocked Have locks_insert_global_blocked and locks_delete_global_blocked take a struct file_lock_core pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-23-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:04 -05:00
locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers. Also ensure that locks and requests are always put on global lists last (after fully initializing them) and are taken off before unintializing them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:14 -04:00
locks: Add lockdep assertion for blocked_lock_lock Annonate insert, remove and iterate function that we need blocked_lock_lock held. Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-04-03 09:04:03 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_{insert,delete}_global_blocked Have locks_insert_global_blocked and locks_delete_global_blocked take a struct file_lock_core pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-23-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:04 -05:00
locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers. Also ensure that locks and requests are always put on global lists last (after fully initializing them) and are taken off before unintializing them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:14 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-28-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:09 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Convert __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks to take a struct file_lock_core pointer. While we could do this in another way, we're going to need to add a file_lock() helper function later anyway, so introduce and use it now. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-24-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:05 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Convert __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks to take a struct file_lock_core pointer. While we could do this in another way, we're going to need to add a file_lock() helper function later anyway, so introduce and use it now. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-24-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:05 -05:00
fs/locks: split out __locks_wake_up_blocks(). This functionality will be useful in future patches, so split it out from locks_wake_up_blocks(). Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Convert __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks to take a struct file_lock_core pointer. While we could do this in another way, we're going to need to add a file_lock() helper function later anyway, so introduce and use it now. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-24-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:05 -05:00
fs/locks: split out __locks_wake_up_blocks(). This functionality will be useful in future patches, so split it out from locks_wake_up_blocks(). Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Convert __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks to take a struct file_lock_core pointer. While we could do this in another way, we're going to need to add a file_lock() helper function later anyway, so introduce and use it now. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-24-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:05 -05:00
filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-28-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:09 -05:00
filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Convert __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks to take a struct file_lock_core pointer. While we could do this in another way, we're going to need to add a file_lock() helper function later anyway, so introduce and use it now. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-24-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:05 -05:00
fs/locks: split out __locks_wake_up_blocks(). This functionality will be useful in future patches, so split it out from locks_wake_up_blocks(). Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Convert __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks to take a struct file_lock_core pointer. While we could do this in another way, we're going to need to add a file_lock() helper function later anyway, so introduce and use it now. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-24-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:05 -05:00
locks: reinstate locks_delete_block optimization There is measurable performance impact in some synthetic tests due to commit 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter). Fix the race condition instead by clearing the fl_blocker pointer after the wake_up, using explicit acquire/release semantics. This does mean that we can no longer use the clearing of fl_blocker as the wait condition, so switch the waiters over to checking whether the fl_blocked_member list_head is empty. Reviewed-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Fixes: 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter) Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-18 07:52:21 -04:00
filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Convert __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks to take a struct file_lock_core pointer. While we could do this in another way, we're going to need to add a file_lock() helper function later anyway, so introduce and use it now. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-24-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:05 -05:00
locks: reinstate locks_delete_block optimization There is measurable performance impact in some synthetic tests due to commit 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter). Fix the race condition instead by clearing the fl_blocker pointer after the wake_up, using explicit acquire/release semantics. This does mean that we can no longer use the clearing of fl_blocker as the wait condition, so switch the waiters over to checking whether the fl_blocked_member list_head is empty. Reviewed-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Fixes: 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter) Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-18 07:52:21 -04:00
filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Convert __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks to take a struct file_lock_core pointer. While we could do this in another way, we're going to need to add a file_lock() helper function later anyway, so introduce and use it now. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-24-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:05 -05:00
fs/locks: split out __locks_wake_up_blocks(). This functionality will be useful in future patches, so split it out from locks_wake_up_blocks(). Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-28-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:09 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: merge posix_unblock_lock() and locks_delete_block() posix_unblock_lock() is not specific to posix locks, and behaves nearly identically to locks_delete_block() - the former returning a status while the later doesn't. So discard posix_unblock_lock() and use locks_delete_block() instead, after giving that function an appropriate return value. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
locks: reinstate locks_delete_block optimization There is measurable performance impact in some synthetic tests due to commit 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter). Fix the race condition instead by clearing the fl_blocker pointer after the wake_up, using explicit acquire/release semantics. This does mean that we can no longer use the clearing of fl_blocker as the wait condition, so switch the waiters over to checking whether the fl_blocked_member list_head is empty. Reviewed-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Fixes: 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter) Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-18 07:52:21 -04:00
filelock: clean up locks_delete_block internals Rework the internals of locks_delete_block to use struct file_lock_core (mostly just for clarity's sake). The prototype is not changed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-27-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:08 -05:00
locks: reinstate locks_delete_block optimization There is measurable performance impact in some synthetic tests due to commit 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter). Fix the race condition instead by clearing the fl_blocker pointer after the wake_up, using explicit acquire/release semantics. This does mean that we can no longer use the clearing of fl_blocker as the wait condition, so switch the waiters over to checking whether the fl_blocked_member list_head is empty. Reviewed-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Fixes: 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter) Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-18 07:52:21 -04:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
filelock: clean up locks_delete_block internals Rework the internals of locks_delete_block to use struct file_lock_core (mostly just for clarity's sake). The prototype is not changed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-27-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:08 -05:00
fs/locks: merge posix_unblock_lock() and locks_delete_block() posix_unblock_lock() is not specific to posix locks, and behaves nearly identically to locks_delete_block() - the former returning a status while the later doesn't. So discard posix_unblock_lock() and use locks_delete_block() instead, after giving that function an appropriate return value. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: clean up locks_delete_block internals Rework the internals of locks_delete_block to use struct file_lock_core (mostly just for clarity's sake). The prototype is not changed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-27-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:08 -05:00
filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-28-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:09 -05:00
locks: reinstate locks_delete_block optimization There is measurable performance impact in some synthetic tests due to commit 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter). Fix the race condition instead by clearing the fl_blocker pointer after the wake_up, using explicit acquire/release semantics. This does mean that we can no longer use the clearing of fl_blocker as the wait condition, so switch the waiters over to checking whether the fl_blocked_member list_head is empty. Reviewed-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Fixes: 6d390e4b5d48 (locks: fix a potential use-after-free problem when wakeup a waiter) Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-18 07:52:21 -04:00
filelock: clean up locks_delete_block internals Rework the internals of locks_delete_block to use struct file_lock_core (mostly just for clarity's sake). The prototype is not changed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-27-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:08 -05:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
fs/locks: merge posix_unblock_lock() and locks_delete_block() posix_unblock_lock() is not specific to posix locks, and behaves nearly identically to locks_delete_block() - the former returning a status while the later doesn't. So discard posix_unblock_lock() and use locks_delete_block() instead, after giving that function an appropriate return value. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-28-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:09 -05:00
fs/locks: merge posix_unblock_lock() and locks_delete_block() posix_unblock_lock() is not specific to posix locks, and behaves nearly identically to locks_delete_block() - the former returning a status while the later doesn't. So discard posix_unblock_lock() and use locks_delete_block() instead, after giving that function an appropriate return value. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
fs/locks: rename some lists and pointers. struct file lock contains an 'fl_next' pointer which is used to point to the lock that this request is blocked waiting for. So rename it to fl_blocker. The fl_blocked list_head in an active lock is the head of a list of blocked requests. In a request it is a node in that list. These are two distinct uses, so replace with two list_heads with different names. fl_blocked_requests is the head of a list of blocked requests fl_blocked_member is a node in a member of that list. The two different list_heads are never used at the same time, but that will change in a future patch. Note that a tracepoint is changed to report fl_blocker instead of fl_next. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests. When we find an existing lock which conflicts with a request, and the request wants to wait, we currently add the request to a list. When the lock is removed, the whole list is woken. This can cause the thundering-herd problem. To reduce the problem, we make use of the (new) fact that a pending request can itself have a list of blocked requests. When we find a conflict, we look through the existing blocked requests. If any one of them blocks the new request, the new request is attached below that request, otherwise it is added to the list of blocked requests, which are now known to be mutually non-conflicting. This way, when the lock is released, only a set of non-conflicting locks will be woken, the rest can stay asleep. If the lock request cannot be granted and the request needs to be requeued, all the other requests it blocks will then be woken To make this more concrete: If you have a many-core machine, and have many threads all wanting to briefly lock a give file (udev is known to do this), you can get quite poor performance. When one thread releases a lock, it wakes up all other threads that are waiting (classic thundering-herd) - one will get the lock and the others go to sleep. When you have few cores, this is not very noticeable: by the time the 4th or 5th thread gets enough CPU time to try to claim the lock, the earlier threads have claimed it, done what was needed, and released. So with few cores, many of the threads don't end up contending. With 50+ cores, lost of threads can get the CPU at the same time, and the contention can easily be measured. This patchset creates a tree of pending lock requests in which siblings don't conflict and each lock request does conflict with its parent. When a lock is released, only requests which don't conflict with each other a woken. Testing shows that lock-acquisitions-per-second is now fairly stable even as the number of contending process goes to 1000. Without this patch, locks-per-second drops off steeply after a few 10s of processes. There is a small cost to this extra complexity. At 20 processes running a particular test on 72 cores, the lock acquisitions per second drops from 1.8 million to 1.4 million with this patch. For 100 processes, this patch still provides 1.4 million while without this patch there are about 700,000. Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-28-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:09 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests. When we find an existing lock which conflicts with a request, and the request wants to wait, we currently add the request to a list. When the lock is removed, the whole list is woken. This can cause the thundering-herd problem. To reduce the problem, we make use of the (new) fact that a pending request can itself have a list of blocked requests. When we find a conflict, we look through the existing blocked requests. If any one of them blocks the new request, the new request is attached below that request, otherwise it is added to the list of blocked requests, which are now known to be mutually non-conflicting. This way, when the lock is released, only a set of non-conflicting locks will be woken, the rest can stay asleep. If the lock request cannot be granted and the request needs to be requeued, all the other requests it blocks will then be woken To make this more concrete: If you have a many-core machine, and have many threads all wanting to briefly lock a give file (udev is known to do this), you can get quite poor performance. When one thread releases a lock, it wakes up all other threads that are waiting (classic thundering-herd) - one will get the lock and the others go to sleep. When you have few cores, this is not very noticeable: by the time the 4th or 5th thread gets enough CPU time to try to claim the lock, the earlier threads have claimed it, done what was needed, and released. So with few cores, many of the threads don't end up contending. With 50+ cores, lost of threads can get the CPU at the same time, and the contention can easily be measured. This patchset creates a tree of pending lock requests in which siblings don't conflict and each lock request does conflict with its parent. When a lock is released, only requests which don't conflict with each other a woken. Testing shows that lock-acquisitions-per-second is now fairly stable even as the number of contending process goes to 1000. Without this patch, locks-per-second drops off steeply after a few 10s of processes. There is a small cost to this extra complexity. At 20 processes running a particular test on 72 cores, the lock acquisitions per second drops from 1.8 million to 1.4 million with this patch. For 100 processes, this patch still provides 1.4 million while without this patch there are about 700,000. Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests. When we find an existing lock which conflicts with a request, and the request wants to wait, we currently add the request to a list. When the lock is removed, the whole list is woken. This can cause the thundering-herd problem. To reduce the problem, we make use of the (new) fact that a pending request can itself have a list of blocked requests. When we find a conflict, we look through the existing blocked requests. If any one of them blocks the new request, the new request is attached below that request, otherwise it is added to the list of blocked requests, which are now known to be mutually non-conflicting. This way, when the lock is released, only a set of non-conflicting locks will be woken, the rest can stay asleep. If the lock request cannot be granted and the request needs to be requeued, all the other requests it blocks will then be woken To make this more concrete: If you have a many-core machine, and have many threads all wanting to briefly lock a give file (udev is known to do this), you can get quite poor performance. When one thread releases a lock, it wakes up all other threads that are waiting (classic thundering-herd) - one will get the lock and the others go to sleep. When you have few cores, this is not very noticeable: by the time the 4th or 5th thread gets enough CPU time to try to claim the lock, the earlier threads have claimed it, done what was needed, and released. So with few cores, many of the threads don't end up contending. With 50+ cores, lost of threads can get the CPU at the same time, and the contention can easily be measured. This patchset creates a tree of pending lock requests in which siblings don't conflict and each lock request does conflict with its parent. When a lock is released, only requests which don't conflict with each other a woken. Testing shows that lock-acquisitions-per-second is now fairly stable even as the number of contending process goes to 1000. Without this patch, locks-per-second drops off steeply after a few 10s of processes. There is a small cost to this extra complexity. At 20 processes running a particular test on 72 cores, the lock acquisitions per second drops from 1.8 million to 1.4 million with this patch. For 100 processes, this patch still provides 1.4 million while without this patch there are about 700,000. Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests. When we find an existing lock which conflicts with a request, and the request wants to wait, we currently add the request to a list. When the lock is removed, the whole list is woken. This can cause the thundering-herd problem. To reduce the problem, we make use of the (new) fact that a pending request can itself have a list of blocked requests. When we find a conflict, we look through the existing blocked requests. If any one of them blocks the new request, the new request is attached below that request, otherwise it is added to the list of blocked requests, which are now known to be mutually non-conflicting. This way, when the lock is released, only a set of non-conflicting locks will be woken, the rest can stay asleep. If the lock request cannot be granted and the request needs to be requeued, all the other requests it blocks will then be woken To make this more concrete: If you have a many-core machine, and have many threads all wanting to briefly lock a give file (udev is known to do this), you can get quite poor performance. When one thread releases a lock, it wakes up all other threads that are waiting (classic thundering-herd) - one will get the lock and the others go to sleep. When you have few cores, this is not very noticeable: by the time the 4th or 5th thread gets enough CPU time to try to claim the lock, the earlier threads have claimed it, done what was needed, and released. So with few cores, many of the threads don't end up contending. With 50+ cores, lost of threads can get the CPU at the same time, and the contention can easily be measured. This patchset creates a tree of pending lock requests in which siblings don't conflict and each lock request does conflict with its parent. When a lock is released, only requests which don't conflict with each other a woken. Testing shows that lock-acquisitions-per-second is now fairly stable even as the number of contending process goes to 1000. Without this patch, locks-per-second drops off steeply after a few 10s of processes. There is a small cost to this extra complexity. At 20 processes running a particular test on 72 cores, the lock acquisitions per second drops from 1.8 million to 1.4 million with this patch. For 100 processes, this patch still provides 1.4 million while without this patch there are about 700,000. Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: convert fl_blocker to file_lock_core Both locks and leases deal with fl_blocker. Switch the fl_blocker pointer in struct file_lock_core to point to the file_lock_core of the blocker instead of a file_lock structure. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-26-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:07 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
filelock: fix deadlock detection in POSIX locking The FL_POSIX check in __locks_insert_block was inadvertantly broken recently and is now inserting only OFD locks instead of only legacy POSIX locks. This breaks deadlock detection in POSIX locks, and may also be the root cause of a performance regression noted by the kernel test robot. Restore the proper sense of the test. Fixes: b6be3714005c ("filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core") Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202402181229.f8147f40-oliver.sang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240218-flsplit4-v1-1-26454fc090f2@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-02-18 08:33:28 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests. Currently, a lock can block pending requests, but all pending requests are equal. If lots of pending requests are mutually exclusive, this means they will all be woken up and all but one will fail. This can hurt performance. So we will allow pending requests to block other requests. Only the first request will be woken, and it will wake the others. This patch doesn't implement this fully, but prepares the way. - It acknowledges that a request might be blocking other requests, and when the request is converted to a lock, those blocked requests are moved across. - When a request is requeued or discarded, all blocked requests are woken. - When deadlock-detection looks for the lock which blocks a given request, we follow the chain of ->fl_blocker all the way to the top. Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests. Currently, a lock can block pending requests, but all pending requests are equal. If lots of pending requests are mutually exclusive, this means they will all be woken up and all but one will fail. This can hurt performance. So we will allow pending requests to block other requests. Only the first request will be woken, and it will wake the others. This patch doesn't implement this fully, but prepares the way. - It acknowledges that a request might be blocking other requests, and when the request is converted to a lock, those blocked requests are moved across. - When a request is requeued or discarded, all blocked requests are woken. - When deadlock-detection looks for the lock which blocks a given request, we follow the chain of ->fl_blocker all the way to the top. Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-28-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:09 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests. When we find an existing lock which conflicts with a request, and the request wants to wait, we currently add the request to a list. When the lock is removed, the whole list is woken. This can cause the thundering-herd problem. To reduce the problem, we make use of the (new) fact that a pending request can itself have a list of blocked requests. When we find a conflict, we look through the existing blocked requests. If any one of them blocks the new request, the new request is attached below that request, otherwise it is added to the list of blocked requests, which are now known to be mutually non-conflicting. This way, when the lock is released, only a set of non-conflicting locks will be woken, the rest can stay asleep. If the lock request cannot be granted and the request needs to be requeued, all the other requests it blocks will then be woken To make this more concrete: If you have a many-core machine, and have many threads all wanting to briefly lock a give file (udev is known to do this), you can get quite poor performance. When one thread releases a lock, it wakes up all other threads that are waiting (classic thundering-herd) - one will get the lock and the others go to sleep. When you have few cores, this is not very noticeable: by the time the 4th or 5th thread gets enough CPU time to try to claim the lock, the earlier threads have claimed it, done what was needed, and released. So with few cores, many of the threads don't end up contending. With 50+ cores, lost of threads can get the CPU at the same time, and the contention can easily be measured. This patchset creates a tree of pending lock requests in which siblings don't conflict and each lock request does conflict with its parent. When a lock is released, only requests which don't conflict with each other a woken. Testing shows that lock-acquisitions-per-second is now fairly stable even as the number of contending process goes to 1000. Without this patch, locks-per-second drops off steeply after a few 10s of processes. There is a small cost to this extra complexity. At 20 processes running a particular test on 72 cores, the lock acquisitions per second drops from 1.8 million to 1.4 million with this patch. For 100 processes, this patch still provides 1.4 million while without this patch there are about 700,000. Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: comment cleanups and clarifications Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:12 -04:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert locks_wake_up_blocks to take a file_lock_core pointer Have locks_wake_up_blocks take a file_lock_core pointer, and fix up the callers to pass one in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-30-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:11 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: avoid taking global lock if possible when waking up blocked waiters Since we always hold the i_lock when inserting a new waiter onto the fl_block list, we can avoid taking the global lock at all if we find that it's empty when we go to wake up blocked waiters. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:16 -04:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
fs/locks: rename some lists and pointers. struct file lock contains an 'fl_next' pointer which is used to point to the lock that this request is blocked waiting for. So rename it to fl_blocker. The fl_blocked list_head in an active lock is the head of a list of blocked requests. In a request it is a node in that list. These are two distinct uses, so replace with two list_heads with different names. fl_blocked_requests is the head of a list of blocked requests fl_blocked_member is a node in a member of that list. The two different list_heads are never used at the same time, but that will change in a future patch. Note that a tracepoint is changed to report fl_blocker instead of fl_next. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
locks: avoid taking global lock if possible when waking up blocked waiters Since we always hold the i_lock when inserting a new waiter onto the fl_block list, we can avoid taking the global lock at all if we find that it's empty when we go to wake up blocked waiters. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:16 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_wake_up_blocks to take a file_lock_core pointer Have locks_wake_up_blocks take a file_lock_core pointer, and fix up the callers to pass one in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-30-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:11 -05:00
locks: avoid taking global lock if possible when waking up blocked waiters Since we always hold the i_lock when inserting a new waiter onto the fl_block list, we can avoid taking the global lock at all if we find that it's empty when we go to wake up blocked waiters. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:16 -04:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_wake_up_blocks to take a file_lock_core pointer Have locks_wake_up_blocks take a file_lock_core pointer, and fix up the callers to pass one in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-30-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:11 -05:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: move flock locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
locks: move flock locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
locks: move flock locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
Revert "locks: keep a count of locks on the flctx lists" This reverts commit 9bd0f45b7037fcfa8b575c7e27d0431d6e6dc3bb. Linus rightly pointed out that I failed to initialize the counters when adding them, so they don't work as expected. Just revert this patch for now. Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-02-16 14:32:03 -05:00
locks: defer freeing locks in locks_delete_lock until after i_lock has been dropped In commit 72f98e72551fa (locks: turn lock_flocks into a spinlock), we moved from using the BKL to a global spinlock. With this change, we lost the ability to block in the fl_release_private operation. This is problematic for NFS (and probably some other filesystems as well). Add a new list_head argument to locks_delete_lock. If that argument is non-NULL, then queue any locks that we want to free to the list instead of freeing them. Then, add a new locks_dispose_list function that will walk such a list and call locks_free_lock on them after the i_lock has been dropped. Finally, change all of the callers of locks_delete_lock to pass in a list_head, except for lease_modify. That function can be called long after the i_lock has been acquired. Deferring the freeing of a lease after unlocking it in that function is non-trivial until we overhaul some of the spinlocking in the lease code. Currently though, no filesystem that sets fl_release_private supports leases, so this is not currently a problem. We'll eventually want to make the same change in the lease code, but it needs a lot more work before we can reasonably do so. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 14:20:31 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
locks: defer freeing locks in locks_delete_lock until after i_lock has been dropped In commit 72f98e72551fa (locks: turn lock_flocks into a spinlock), we moved from using the BKL to a global spinlock. With this change, we lost the ability to block in the fl_release_private operation. This is problematic for NFS (and probably some other filesystems as well). Add a new list_head argument to locks_delete_lock. If that argument is non-NULL, then queue any locks that we want to free to the list instead of freeing them. Then, add a new locks_dispose_list function that will walk such a list and call locks_free_lock on them after the i_lock has been dropped. Finally, change all of the callers of locks_delete_lock to pass in a list_head, except for lease_modify. That function can be called long after the i_lock has been acquired. Deferring the freeing of a lease after unlocking it in that function is non-trivial until we overhaul some of the spinlocking in the lease code. Currently though, no filesystem that sets fl_release_private supports leases, so this is not currently a problem. We'll eventually want to make the same change in the lease code, but it needs a lot more work before we can reasonably do so. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 14:20:31 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: change all *_conflict() functions to return bool. posix_locks_conflict() and flock_locks_conflict() both return int. leases_conflict() returns bool. This inconsistency will cause problems for the next patch if not fixed. So change posix_locks_conflict() and flock_locks_conflict() to return bool. Also change the locks_conflict() helper. And convert some return (foo); to return foo; Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: change all *_conflict() functions to return bool. posix_locks_conflict() and flock_locks_conflict() both return int. leases_conflict() returns bool. This inconsistency will cause problems for the next patch if not fixed. So change posix_locks_conflict() and flock_locks_conflict() to return bool. Also change the locks_conflict() helper. And convert some return (foo); to return foo; Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: change all *_conflict() functions to return bool. posix_locks_conflict() and flock_locks_conflict() both return int. leases_conflict() returns bool. This inconsistency will cause problems for the next patch if not fixed. So change posix_locks_conflict() and flock_locks_conflict() to return bool. Also change the locks_conflict() helper. And convert some return (foo); to return foo; Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: change all *_conflict() functions to return bool. posix_locks_conflict() and flock_locks_conflict() both return int. leases_conflict() returns bool. This inconsistency will cause problems for the next patch if not fixed. So change posix_locks_conflict() and flock_locks_conflict() to return bool. Also change the locks_conflict() helper. And convert some return (foo); to return foo; Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: F_UNLCK extension for F_OFD_GETLK Currently F_UNLCK with F_OFD_GETLK returns -EINVAL. This patch changes it such that specifying F_UNLCK returns information only about OFD locks that are owned by the given file description. Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2023-06-22 21:52:23 +05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: F_UNLCK extension for F_OFD_GETLK Currently F_UNLCK with F_OFD_GETLK returns -EINVAL. This patch changes it such that specifying F_UNLCK returns information only about OFD locks that are owned by the given file description. Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2023-06-22 21:52:23 +05:00
filelock: add some new helper functions In later patches we're going to embed some common fields into a new structure inside struct file_lock. Smooth the transition by adding some new helper functions, and converting the core file locking code to use them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-4-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:45 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: F_UNLCK extension for F_OFD_GETLK Currently F_UNLCK with F_OFD_GETLK returns -EINVAL. This patch changes it such that specifying F_UNLCK returns information only about OFD locks that are owned by the given file description. Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2023-06-22 21:52:23 +05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: F_UNLCK extension for F_OFD_GETLK Currently F_UNLCK with F_OFD_GETLK returns -EINVAL. This patch changes it such that specifying F_UNLCK returns information only about OFD locks that are owned by the given file description. Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2023-06-22 21:52:23 +05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: change all *_conflict() functions to return bool. posix_locks_conflict() and flock_locks_conflict() both return int. leases_conflict() returns bool. This inconsistency will cause problems for the next patch if not fixed. So change posix_locks_conflict() and flock_locks_conflict() to return bool. Also change the locks_conflict() helper. And convert some return (foo); to return foo; Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: make posix_test_lock() interface more consistent Since posix_test_lock(), like fcntl() and ->lock(), indicates absence or presence of a conflict lock by setting fl_type to, respectively, F_UNLCK or something other than F_UNLCK, the return value is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-05-11 16:09:32 -04:00
locks: give posix_test_lock same interface as ->lock posix_test_lock() and ->lock() do the same job but have gratuitously different interfaces. Modify posix_test_lock() so the two agree, simplifying some code in the process. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-21 00:55:18 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
fs/lock: add 2 callbacks to lock_manager_operations to resolve conflict Add 2 new callbacks, lm_lock_expirable and lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations to allow the lock manager to take appropriate action to resolve the lock conflict if possible. A new field, lm_mod_owner, is also added to lock_manager_operations. The lm_mod_owner is used by the fs/lock code to make sure the lock manager module such as nfsd, is not freed while lock conflict is being resolved. lm_lock_expirable checks and returns true to indicate that the lock conflict can be resolved else return false. This callback must be called with the flc_lock held so it can not block. lm_expire_lock is called to resolve the lock conflict if the returned value from lm_lock_expirable is true. This callback is called without the flc_lock held since it's allowed to block. Upon returning from this callback, the lock conflict should be resolved and the caller is expected to restart the conflict check from the beginnning of the list. Lock manager, such as NFSv4 courteous server, uses this callback to resolve conflict by destroying lock owner, or the NFSv4 courtesy client (client that has expired but allowed to maintains its states) that owns the lock. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:25 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: add a new locks_inode_context accessor function There are a number of places in the kernel that are accessing the inode->i_flctx field without smp_load_acquire. This is required to ensure that the caller doesn't see a partially-initialized structure. Add a new accessor function for it to make this clear and convert all of the relevant accesses in locks.c to use it. Also, convert locks_free_lock_context to use the helper as well instead of just doing a "bare" assignment. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-16 09:02:30 -05:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
fs/lock: add 2 callbacks to lock_manager_operations to resolve conflict Add 2 new callbacks, lm_lock_expirable and lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations to allow the lock manager to take appropriate action to resolve the lock conflict if possible. A new field, lm_mod_owner, is also added to lock_manager_operations. The lm_mod_owner is used by the fs/lock code to make sure the lock manager module such as nfsd, is not freed while lock conflict is being resolved. lm_lock_expirable checks and returns true to indicate that the lock conflict can be resolved else return false. This callback must be called with the flc_lock held so it can not block. lm_expire_lock is called to resolve the lock conflict if the returned value from lm_lock_expirable is true. This callback is called without the flc_lock held since it's allowed to block. Upon returning from this callback, the lock conflict should be resolved and the caller is expected to restart the conflict check from the beginnning of the list. Lock manager, such as NFSv4 courteous server, uses this callback to resolve conflict by destroying lock owner, or the NFSv4 courtesy client (client that has expired but allowed to maintains its states) that owns the lock. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:25 -07:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs/locks: F_UNLCK extension for F_OFD_GETLK Currently F_UNLCK with F_OFD_GETLK returns -EINVAL. This patch changes it such that specifying F_UNLCK returns information only about OFD locks that are owned by the given file description. Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2023-06-22 21:52:23 +05:00
fs/lock: add 2 callbacks to lock_manager_operations to resolve conflict Add 2 new callbacks, lm_lock_expirable and lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations to allow the lock manager to take appropriate action to resolve the lock conflict if possible. A new field, lm_mod_owner, is also added to lock_manager_operations. The lm_mod_owner is used by the fs/lock code to make sure the lock manager module such as nfsd, is not freed while lock conflict is being resolved. lm_lock_expirable checks and returns true to indicate that the lock conflict can be resolved else return false. This callback must be called with the flc_lock held so it can not block. lm_expire_lock is called to resolve the lock conflict if the returned value from lm_lock_expirable is true. This callback is called without the flc_lock held since it's allowed to block. Upon returning from this callback, the lock conflict should be resolved and the caller is expected to restart the conflict check from the beginnning of the list. Lock manager, such as NFSv4 courteous server, uses this callback to resolve conflict by destroying lock owner, or the NFSv4 courtesy client (client that has expired but allowed to maintains its states) that owns the lock. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:25 -07:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
fs/lock: add 2 callbacks to lock_manager_operations to resolve conflict Add 2 new callbacks, lm_lock_expirable and lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations to allow the lock manager to take appropriate action to resolve the lock conflict if possible. A new field, lm_mod_owner, is also added to lock_manager_operations. The lm_mod_owner is used by the fs/lock code to make sure the lock manager module such as nfsd, is not freed while lock conflict is being resolved. lm_lock_expirable checks and returns true to indicate that the lock conflict can be resolved else return false. This callback must be called with the flc_lock held so it can not block. lm_expire_lock is called to resolve the lock conflict if the returned value from lm_lock_expirable is true. This callback is called without the flc_lock held since it's allowed to block. Upon returning from this callback, the lock conflict should be resolved and the caller is expected to restart the conflict check from the beginnning of the list. Lock manager, such as NFSv4 courteous server, uses this callback to resolve conflict by destroying lock owner, or the NFSv4 courtesy client (client that has expired but allowed to maintains its states) that owns the lock. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:25 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: make posix_test_lock() interface more consistent Since posix_test_lock(), like fcntl() and ->lock(), indicates absence or presence of a conflict lock by setting fl_type to, respectively, F_UNLCK or something other than F_UNLCK, the return value is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-05-11 16:09:32 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: clarify posix_locks_deadlock For such a short function (with such a long comment), posix_locks_deadlock() seems to cause a lot of confusion. Attempt to make it a bit clearer: - Remove the initial posix_same_owner() check, which can never pass (since this is only called in the case that block_fl and caller_fl conflict) - Use an explicit loop (and a helper function) instead of a goto. - Rewrite the comment, attempting a clearer explanation, and removing some uninteresting historical detail. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-10-26 18:05:40 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: clarify posix_locks_deadlock For such a short function (with such a long comment), posix_locks_deadlock() seems to cause a lot of confusion. Attempt to make it a bit clearer: - Remove the initial posix_same_owner() check, which can never pass (since this is only called in the case that block_fl and caller_fl conflict) - Use an explicit loop (and a helper function) instead of a goto. - Rewrite the comment, attempting a clearer explanation, and removing some uninteresting historical detail. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-10-26 18:05:40 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: clarify posix_locks_deadlock For such a short function (with such a long comment), posix_locks_deadlock() seems to cause a lot of confusion. Attempt to make it a bit clearer: - Remove the initial posix_same_owner() check, which can never pass (since this is only called in the case that block_fl and caller_fl conflict) - Use an explicit loop (and a helper function) instead of a goto. - Rewrite the comment, attempting a clearer explanation, and removing some uninteresting historical detail. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-10-26 18:05:40 -04:00
locks: fix possible infinite loop in posix deadlock detection It's currently possible to send posix_locks_deadlock() into an infinite loop (under the BKL). For now, fix this just by bailing out after a few iterations. We may want to fix this in a way that better clarifies the semantics of deadlock detection. But that will take more time, and this minimal fix is probably adequate for any realistic scenario, and is simple enough to be appropriate for applying to stable kernels now. Thanks to George Davis for reporting the problem. Cc: "George G. Davis" <gdavis@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-30 11:20:02 -04:00
locks: clarify posix_locks_deadlock For such a short function (with such a long comment), posix_locks_deadlock() seems to cause a lot of confusion. Attempt to make it a bit clearer: - Remove the initial posix_same_owner() check, which can never pass (since this is only called in the case that block_fl and caller_fl conflict) - Use an explicit loop (and a helper function) instead of a goto. - Rewrite the comment, attempting a clearer explanation, and removing some uninteresting historical detail. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-10-26 18:05:40 -04:00
locks: skip deadlock detection on FL_FILE_PVT locks It's not really feasible to do deadlock detection with FL_FILE_PVT locks since they aren't owned by a single task, per-se. Deadlock detection also tends to be rather expensive so just skip it for these sorts of locks. Also, add a FIXME comment about adding more limited deadlock detection that just applies to ro -> rw upgrades, per Andy's request. Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:09 -05:00
locks: rename FL_FILE_PVT and IS_FILE_PVT to use "*_OFDLCK" instead File-private locks have been re-christened as "open file description" locks. Finish the symbol name cleanup in the internal implementation. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-22 08:24:32 -04:00
locks: skip deadlock detection on FL_FILE_PVT locks It's not really feasible to do deadlock detection with FL_FILE_PVT locks since they aren't owned by a single task, per-se. Deadlock detection also tends to be rather expensive so just skip it for these sorts of locks. Also, add a FIXME comment about adding more limited deadlock detection that just applies to ro -> rw upgrades, per Andy's request. Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:09 -05:00
locks: rename FL_FILE_PVT and IS_FILE_PVT to use "*_OFDLCK" instead File-private locks have been re-christened as "open file description" locks. Finish the symbol name cleanup in the internal implementation. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-22 08:24:32 -04:00
locks: skip deadlock detection on FL_FILE_PVT locks It's not really feasible to do deadlock detection with FL_FILE_PVT locks since they aren't owned by a single task, per-se. Deadlock detection also tends to be rather expensive so just skip it for these sorts of locks. Also, add a FIXME comment about adding more limited deadlock detection that just applies to ro -> rw upgrades, per Andy's request. Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:09 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix possible infinite loop in posix deadlock detection It's currently possible to send posix_locks_deadlock() into an infinite loop (under the BKL). For now, fix this just by bailing out after a few iterations. We may want to fix this in a way that better clarifies the semantics of deadlock detection. But that will take more time, and this minimal fix is probably adequate for any realistic scenario, and is simple enough to be appropriate for applying to stable kernels now. Thanks to George Davis for reporting the problem. Cc: "George G. Davis" <gdavis@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-30 11:20:02 -04:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: clarify posix_locks_deadlock For such a short function (with such a long comment), posix_locks_deadlock() seems to cause a lot of confusion. Attempt to make it a bit clearer: - Remove the initial posix_same_owner() check, which can never pass (since this is only called in the case that block_fl and caller_fl conflict) - Use an explicit loop (and a helper function) instead of a goto. - Rewrite the comment, attempting a clearer explanation, and removing some uninteresting historical detail. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-10-26 18:05:40 -04:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: clarify posix_locks_deadlock For such a short function (with such a long comment), posix_locks_deadlock() seems to cause a lot of confusion. Attempt to make it a bit clearer: - Remove the initial posix_same_owner() check, which can never pass (since this is only called in the case that block_fl and caller_fl conflict) - Use an explicit loop (and a helper function) instead of a goto. - Rewrite the comment, attempting a clearer explanation, and removing some uninteresting historical detail. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-10-26 18:05:40 -04:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
filelock: convert fl_blocker to file_lock_core Both locks and leases deal with fl_blocker. Switch the fl_blocker pointer in struct file_lock_core to point to the file_lock_core of the blocker instead of a file_lock structure. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-26-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:07 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests. Currently, a lock can block pending requests, but all pending requests are equal. If lots of pending requests are mutually exclusive, this means they will all be woken up and all but one will fail. This can hurt performance. So we will allow pending requests to block other requests. Only the first request will be woken, and it will wake the others. This patch doesn't implement this fully, but prepares the way. - It acknowledges that a request might be blocking other requests, and when the request is converted to a lock, those blocked requests are moved across. - When a request is requeued or discarded, all blocked requests are woken. - When deadlock-detection looks for the lock which blocks a given request, we follow the chain of ->fl_blocker all the way to the top. Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
locks: clarify posix_locks_deadlock For such a short function (with such a long comment), posix_locks_deadlock() seems to cause a lot of confusion. Attempt to make it a bit clearer: - Remove the initial posix_same_owner() check, which can never pass (since this is only called in the case that block_fl and caller_fl conflict) - Use an explicit loop (and a helper function) instead of a goto. - Rewrite the comment, attempting a clearer explanation, and removing some uninteresting historical detail. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-10-26 18:05:40 -04:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: fix possible infinite loop in posix deadlock detection It's currently possible to send posix_locks_deadlock() into an infinite loop (under the BKL). For now, fix this just by bailing out after a few iterations. We may want to fix this in a way that better clarifies the semantics of deadlock detection. But that will take more time, and this minimal fix is probably adequate for any realistic scenario, and is simple enough to be appropriate for applying to stable kernels now. Thanks to George Davis for reporting the problem. Cc: "George G. Davis" <gdavis@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-30 11:20:02 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: Add lockdep assertion for blocked_lock_lock Annonate insert, remove and iterate function that we need blocked_lock_lock held. Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-04-03 09:04:03 -04:00
locks: skip deadlock detection on FL_FILE_PVT locks It's not really feasible to do deadlock detection with FL_FILE_PVT locks since they aren't owned by a single task, per-se. Deadlock detection also tends to be rather expensive so just skip it for these sorts of locks. Also, add a FIXME comment about adding more limited deadlock detection that just applies to ro -> rw upgrades, per Andy's request. Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:09 -05:00
locks: rename FL_FILE_PVT and IS_FILE_PVT to use "*_OFDLCK" instead File-private locks have been re-christened as "open file description" locks. Finish the symbol name cleanup in the internal implementation. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-22 08:24:32 -04:00
locks: skip deadlock detection on FL_FILE_PVT locks It's not really feasible to do deadlock detection with FL_FILE_PVT locks since they aren't owned by a single task, per-se. Deadlock detection also tends to be rather expensive so just skip it for these sorts of locks. Also, add a FIXME comment about adding more limited deadlock detection that just applies to ro -> rw upgrades, per Andy's request. Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:09 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: skip deadlock detection on FL_FILE_PVT locks It's not really feasible to do deadlock detection with FL_FILE_PVT locks since they aren't owned by a single task, per-se. Deadlock detection also tends to be rather expensive so just skip it for these sorts of locks. Also, add a FIXME comment about adding more limited deadlock detection that just applies to ro -> rw upgrades, per Andy's request. Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:09 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: clarify posix_locks_deadlock For such a short function (with such a long comment), posix_locks_deadlock() seems to cause a lot of confusion. Attempt to make it a bit clearer: - Remove the initial posix_same_owner() check, which can never pass (since this is only called in the case that block_fl and caller_fl conflict) - Use an explicit loop (and a helper function) instead of a goto. - Rewrite the comment, attempting a clearer explanation, and removing some uninteresting historical detail. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-10-26 18:05:40 -04:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix flock_lock_file() comment This comment wasn't updated when lease support was added, and it makes essentially the same mistake that the code made before a recent bugfix. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-09-12 15:45:07 -04:00
VFS: Allow caller to determine if BSD or posix locks were actually freed Change posix_lock_file_conf(), and flock_lock_file() so that if called with an F_UNLCK argument, and the FL_EXISTS flag they will indicate whether or not any locks were actually freed by returning 0 or -ENOENT. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-06-29 16:38:32 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: have flock_lock_file take an inode pointer instead of a filp ...and rename it to better describe how it works. In order to fix a use-after-free in NFS, we need to be able to remove locks from an inode after the filp associated with them may have already been freed. flock_lock_file already only dereferences the filp to get to the inode, so just change it so the callers do that. All of the callers already pass in a lock request that has the fl_file set properly, so we don't need to pass it in individually. With that change it now only dereferences the filp to get to the inode, so just push that out to the callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Tested-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2015-07-11 06:43:02 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] fs/locks.c: Fix sys_flock() race sys_flock() currently has a race which can result in a double free in the multi-thread case. Thread 1 Thread 2 sys_flock(file, LOCK_EX) sys_flock(file, LOCK_UN) If Thread 2 removes the lock from inode->i_lock before Thread 1 tests for list_empty(&lock->fl_link) at the end of sys_flock, then both threads will end up calling locks_free_lock for the same lock. Fix is to make flock_lock_file() do the same as posix_lock_file(), namely to make a copy of the request, so that the caller can always free the lock. This also has the side-effect of fixing up a reference problem in the lockd handling of flock. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-31 02:30:55 -08:00
locks: move flock locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: move flock locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: defer freeing locks in locks_delete_lock until after i_lock has been dropped In commit 72f98e72551fa (locks: turn lock_flocks into a spinlock), we moved from using the BKL to a global spinlock. With this change, we lost the ability to block in the fl_release_private operation. This is problematic for NFS (and probably some other filesystems as well). Add a new list_head argument to locks_delete_lock. If that argument is non-NULL, then queue any locks that we want to free to the list instead of freeing them. Then, add a new locks_dispose_list function that will walk such a list and call locks_free_lock on them after the i_lock has been dropped. Finally, change all of the callers of locks_delete_lock to pass in a list_head, except for lease_modify. That function can be called long after the i_lock has been acquired. Deferring the freeing of a lease after unlocking it in that function is non-trivial until we overhaul some of the spinlocking in the lease code. Currently though, no filesystem that sets fl_release_private supports leases, so this is not currently a problem. We'll eventually want to make the same change in the lease code, but it needs a lot more work before we can reasonably do so. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 14:20:31 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: don't allocate a lock context for an F_UNLCK request In the event that we get an F_UNLCK request on an inode that has no lock context, there is no reason to allocate one. Change locks_get_lock_context to take a "type" pointer and avoid allocating a new context if it's F_UNLCK. Then, fix the callers to return appropriately if that function returns NULL. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-04-03 09:04:03 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: don't allocate a lock context for an F_UNLCK request In the event that we get an F_UNLCK request on an inode that has no lock context, there is no reason to allocate one. Change locks_get_lock_context to take a "type" pointer and avoid allocating a new context if it's F_UNLCK. Then, fix the callers to return appropriately if that function returns NULL. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-04-03 09:04:03 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: don't allocate a lock context for an F_UNLCK request In the event that we get an F_UNLCK request on an inode that has no lock context, there is no reason to allocate one. Change locks_get_lock_context to take a "type" pointer and avoid allocating a new context if it's F_UNLCK. Then, fix the callers to return appropriately if that function returns NULL. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-04-03 09:04:03 -04:00
locks: move flock locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Memory shortage can result in inconsistent flocks state When the flock_lock_file() is called to change the flock from F_RDLCK to F_WRLCK or vice versa the existing flock can be removed without appropriate warning. Look: for_each_lock(inode, before) { struct file_lock *fl = *before; if (IS_POSIX(fl)) break; if (IS_LEASE(fl)) continue; if (filp != fl->fl_file) continue; if (request->fl_type == fl->fl_type) goto out; found = 1; locks_delete_lock(before); <<<<<< ! break; } if after this point the subsequent locks_alloc_lock() will fail the return code will be -ENOMEM, but the existing lock is already removed. This is a known feature that such "re-locking" is not atomic, but in the racy case the file should stay locked (although by some other process), but in this case the file will be unlocked. The proposal is to prepare the lock in advance keeping no chance to fail in the future code. Found during making the flocks pid-namespaces aware. (Note: Thanks to Reuben Farrelly for finding a bug in an earlier version of this patch.) Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Cc: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linuxkernel@reub.net>
2007-09-11 16:38:13 +04:00
fs/locks.c: prepare for BKL removal This prepares the removal of the big kernel lock from the file locking code. We still use the BKL as long as fs/lockd uses it and ceph might sleep, but we can flip the definition to a private spinlock as soon as that's done. All users outside of fs/lockd get converted to use lock_flocks() instead of lock_kernel() where appropriate. Based on an earlier patch to use a spinlock from Matthew Wilcox, who has attempted this a few times before, the earliest patch from over 10 years ago turned it into a semaphore, which ended up being slower than the BKL and was subsequently reverted. Someone should do some serious performance testing when this becomes a spinlock, since this has caused problems before. Using a spinlock should be at least as good as the BKL in theory, but who knows... Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Cc: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
2010-09-18 15:09:31 +02:00
Memory shortage can result in inconsistent flocks state When the flock_lock_file() is called to change the flock from F_RDLCK to F_WRLCK or vice versa the existing flock can be removed without appropriate warning. Look: for_each_lock(inode, before) { struct file_lock *fl = *before; if (IS_POSIX(fl)) break; if (IS_LEASE(fl)) continue; if (filp != fl->fl_file) continue; if (request->fl_type == fl->fl_type) goto out; found = 1; locks_delete_lock(before); <<<<<< ! break; } if after this point the subsequent locks_alloc_lock() will fail the return code will be -ENOMEM, but the existing lock is already removed. This is a known feature that such "re-locking" is not atomic, but in the racy case the file should stay locked (although by some other process), but in this case the file will be unlocked. The proposal is to prepare the lock in advance keeping no chance to fail in the future code. Found during making the flocks pid-namespaces aware. (Note: Thanks to Reuben Farrelly for finding a bug in an earlier version of this patch.) Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Cc: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linuxkernel@reub.net>
2007-09-11 16:38:13 +04:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs/locks.c: prepare for BKL removal This prepares the removal of the big kernel lock from the file locking code. We still use the BKL as long as fs/lockd uses it and ceph might sleep, but we can flip the definition to a private spinlock as soon as that's done. All users outside of fs/lockd get converted to use lock_flocks() instead of lock_kernel() where appropriate. Based on an earlier patch to use a spinlock from Matthew Wilcox, who has attempted this a few times before, the earliest patch from over 10 years ago turned it into a semaphore, which ended up being slower than the BKL and was subsequently reverted. Someone should do some serious performance testing when this becomes a spinlock, since this has caused problems before. Using a spinlock should be at least as good as the BKL in theory, but who knows... Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Cc: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
2010-09-18 15:09:31 +02:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: move flock locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: add some new helper functions In later patches we're going to embed some common fields into a new structure inside struct file_lock. Smooth the transition by adding some new helper functions, and converting the core file locking code to use them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-4-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:45 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
VFS: Allow caller to determine if BSD or posix locks were actually freed Change posix_lock_file_conf(), and flock_lock_file() so that if called with an F_UNLCK argument, and the FL_EXISTS flag they will indicate whether or not any locks were actually freed by returning 0 or -ENOENT. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-06-29 16:38:32 -04:00
[PATCH] fs/locks.c: Fix sys_flock() race sys_flock() currently has a race which can result in a double free in the multi-thread case. Thread 1 Thread 2 sys_flock(file, LOCK_EX) sys_flock(file, LOCK_UN) If Thread 2 removes the lock from inode->i_lock before Thread 1 tests for list_empty(&lock->fl_link) at the end of sys_flock, then both threads will end up calling locks_free_lock for the same lock. Fix is to make flock_lock_file() do the same as posix_lock_file(), namely to make a copy of the request, so that the caller can always free the lock. This also has the side-effect of fixing up a reference problem in the lockd handling of flock. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-31 02:30:55 -08:00
VFS: Allow caller to determine if BSD or posix locks were actually freed Change posix_lock_file_conf(), and flock_lock_file() so that if called with an F_UNLCK argument, and the FL_EXISTS flag they will indicate whether or not any locks were actually freed by returning 0 or -ENOENT. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-06-29 16:38:32 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
VFS: Add support for the FL_ACCESS flag to flock_lock_file() Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-06-29 16:38:37 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: add special return value for asynchronous locks Use a special error value FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED to mean that a locking operation returned asynchronously. This is returned by posix_lock_file() for sleeping locks to mean that the lock has been queued on the block list, and will be woken up when it might become available and needs to be retried (either fl_lmops->fl_notify() is called or fl_wait is woken up). f_op->lock() to mean either the above, or that the filesystem will call back with fl_lmops->fl_grant() when the result of the locking operation is known. The filesystem can do this for sleeping as well as non-sleeping locks. This is to make sure, that return values of -EAGAIN and -EINPROGRESS by filesystems are not mistaken to mean an asynchronous locking. This also makes error handling in fs/locks.c and lockd/svclock.c slightly cleaner. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:57 -07:00
filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-28-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:09 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
VFS: Add support for the FL_ACCESS flag to flock_lock_file() Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-06-29 16:38:37 -04:00
[PATCH] fs/locks.c: Fix sys_flock() race sys_flock() currently has a race which can result in a double free in the multi-thread case. Thread 1 Thread 2 sys_flock(file, LOCK_EX) sys_flock(file, LOCK_UN) If Thread 2 removes the lock from inode->i_lock before Thread 1 tests for list_empty(&lock->fl_link) at the end of sys_flock, then both threads will end up calling locks_free_lock for the same lock. Fix is to make flock_lock_file() do the same as posix_lock_file(), namely to make a copy of the request, so that the caller can always free the lock. This also has the side-effect of fixing up a reference problem in the lockd handling of flock. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-31 02:30:55 -08:00
fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests. Currently, a lock can block pending requests, but all pending requests are equal. If lots of pending requests are mutually exclusive, this means they will all be woken up and all but one will fail. This can hurt performance. So we will allow pending requests to block other requests. Only the first request will be woken, and it will wake the others. This patch doesn't implement this fully, but prepares the way. - It acknowledges that a request might be blocking other requests, and when the request is converted to a lock, those blocked requests are moved across. - When a request is requeued or discarded, all blocked requests are woken. - When deadlock-detection looks for the lock which blocks a given request, we follow the chain of ->fl_blocker all the way to the top. Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
[PATCH] fs/locks.c: Fix sys_flock() race sys_flock() currently has a race which can result in a double free in the multi-thread case. Thread 1 Thread 2 sys_flock(file, LOCK_EX) sys_flock(file, LOCK_UN) If Thread 2 removes the lock from inode->i_lock before Thread 1 tests for list_empty(&lock->fl_link) at the end of sys_flock, then both threads will end up calling locks_free_lock for the same lock. Fix is to make flock_lock_file() do the same as posix_lock_file(), namely to make a copy of the request, so that the caller can always free the lock. This also has the side-effect of fixing up a reference problem in the lockd handling of flock. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-31 02:30:55 -08:00
[PATCH] Return error in case flock_lock_file failure If flock_lock_file() failed to allocate flock with locks_alloc_lock() then "error = 0" is returned. Need to return some non-zero. Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-14 17:59:35 +04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
[PATCH] fs/locks.c: Fix sys_flock() race sys_flock() currently has a race which can result in a double free in the multi-thread case. Thread 1 Thread 2 sys_flock(file, LOCK_EX) sys_flock(file, LOCK_UN) If Thread 2 removes the lock from inode->i_lock before Thread 1 tests for list_empty(&lock->fl_link) at the end of sys_flock, then both threads will end up calling locks_free_lock for the same lock. Fix is to make flock_lock_file() do the same as posix_lock_file(), namely to make a copy of the request, so that the caller can always free the lock. This also has the side-effect of fixing up a reference problem in the lockd handling of flock. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-31 02:30:55 -08:00
locks: defer freeing locks in locks_delete_lock until after i_lock has been dropped In commit 72f98e72551fa (locks: turn lock_flocks into a spinlock), we moved from using the BKL to a global spinlock. With this change, we lost the ability to block in the fl_release_private operation. This is problematic for NFS (and probably some other filesystems as well). Add a new list_head argument to locks_delete_lock. If that argument is non-NULL, then queue any locks that we want to free to the list instead of freeing them. Then, add a new locks_dispose_list function that will walk such a list and call locks_free_lock on them after the i_lock has been dropped. Finally, change all of the callers of locks_delete_lock to pass in a list_head, except for lease_modify. That function can be called long after the i_lock has been acquired. Deferring the freeing of a lease after unlocking it in that function is non-trivial until we overhaul some of the spinlocking in the lease code. Currently though, no filesystem that sets fl_release_private supports leases, so this is not currently a problem. We'll eventually want to make the same change in the lease code, but it needs a lot more work before we can reasonably do so. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 14:20:31 -04:00
locks: add tracepoint in flock codepath Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-07-30 07:54:56 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: rename __posix_lock_file to posix_lock_inode ...a more descriptive name and we can drop the double underscore prefix. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-07 18:27:42 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
[PATCH] locks: don't do unnecessary allocations posix_lock_file() always allocates new locks in advance, even if it's easy to determine that no allocations will be needed. Optimize these cases: - FL_ACCESS flag is set - Unlocking the whole range Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-23 02:05:10 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: make "added" in __posix_lock_file a bool Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:13 -04:00
locks: defer freeing locks in locks_delete_lock until after i_lock has been dropped In commit 72f98e72551fa (locks: turn lock_flocks into a spinlock), we moved from using the BKL to a global spinlock. With this change, we lost the ability to block in the fl_release_private operation. This is problematic for NFS (and probably some other filesystems as well). Add a new list_head argument to locks_delete_lock. If that argument is non-NULL, then queue any locks that we want to free to the list instead of freeing them. Then, add a new locks_dispose_list function that will walk such a list and call locks_free_lock on them after the i_lock has been dropped. Finally, change all of the callers of locks_delete_lock to pass in a list_head, except for lease_modify. That function can be called long after the i_lock has been acquired. Deferring the freeing of a lease after unlocking it in that function is non-trivial until we overhaul some of the spinlocking in the lease code. Currently though, no filesystem that sets fl_release_private supports leases, so this is not currently a problem. We'll eventually want to make the same change in the lease code, but it needs a lot more work before we can reasonably do so. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 14:20:31 -04:00
fs/lock: add 2 callbacks to lock_manager_operations to resolve conflict Add 2 new callbacks, lm_lock_expirable and lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations to allow the lock manager to take appropriate action to resolve the lock conflict if possible. A new field, lm_mod_owner, is also added to lock_manager_operations. The lm_mod_owner is used by the fs/lock code to make sure the lock manager module such as nfsd, is not freed while lock conflict is being resolved. lm_lock_expirable checks and returns true to indicate that the lock conflict can be resolved else return false. This callback must be called with the flc_lock held so it can not block. lm_expire_lock is called to resolve the lock conflict if the returned value from lm_lock_expirable is true. This callback is called without the flc_lock held since it's allowed to block. Upon returning from this callback, the lock conflict should be resolved and the caller is expected to restart the conflict check from the beginnning of the list. Lock manager, such as NFSv4 courteous server, uses this callback to resolve conflict by destroying lock owner, or the NFSv4 courtesy client (client that has expired but allowed to maintains its states) that owns the lock. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:25 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: add some new helper functions In later patches we're going to embed some common fields into a new structure inside struct file_lock. Smooth the transition by adding some new helper functions, and converting the core file locking code to use them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-4-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:45 -05:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] locks: don't do unnecessary allocations posix_lock_file() always allocates new locks in advance, even if it's easy to determine that no allocations will be needed. Optimize these cases: - FL_ACCESS flag is set - Unlocking the whole range Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-23 02:05:10 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
[PATCH] locks: don't do unnecessary allocations posix_lock_file() always allocates new locks in advance, even if it's easy to determine that no allocations will be needed. Optimize these cases: - FL_ACCESS flag is set - Unlocking the whole range Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-23 02:05:10 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/lock: add 2 callbacks to lock_manager_operations to resolve conflict Add 2 new callbacks, lm_lock_expirable and lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations to allow the lock manager to take appropriate action to resolve the lock conflict if possible. A new field, lm_mod_owner, is also added to lock_manager_operations. The lm_mod_owner is used by the fs/lock code to make sure the lock manager module such as nfsd, is not freed while lock conflict is being resolved. lm_lock_expirable checks and returns true to indicate that the lock conflict can be resolved else return false. This callback must be called with the flc_lock held so it can not block. lm_expire_lock is called to resolve the lock conflict if the returned value from lm_lock_expirable is true. This callback is called without the flc_lock held since it's allowed to block. Upon returning from this callback, the lock conflict should be resolved and the caller is expected to restart the conflict check from the beginnning of the list. Lock manager, such as NFSv4 courteous server, uses this callback to resolve conflict by destroying lock owner, or the NFSv4 courtesy client (client that has expired but allowed to maintains its states) that owns the lock. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:25 -07:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: comment cleanups and clarifications Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:12 -04:00
locks: turn the blocked_list into a hashtable Break up the blocked_list into a hashtable, using the fl_owner as a key. This speeds up searching the hash chains, which is especially significant for deadlock detection. Note that the initial implementation assumes that hashing on fl_owner is sufficient. In most cases it should be, with the notable exception being server-side lockd, which compares ownership using a tuple of the nlm_host and the pid sent in the lock request. So, this may degrade to a single hash bucket when you only have a single NFS client. That will be addressed in a later patch. The careful observer may note that this patch leaves the file_lock_list alone. There's much less of a case for turning the file_lock_list into a hashtable. The only user of that list is the code that generates /proc/locks, and it always walks the entire list. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:18 -04:00
locks: comment cleanups and clarifications Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:12 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/lock: add 2 callbacks to lock_manager_operations to resolve conflict Add 2 new callbacks, lm_lock_expirable and lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations to allow the lock manager to take appropriate action to resolve the lock conflict if possible. A new field, lm_mod_owner, is also added to lock_manager_operations. The lm_mod_owner is used by the fs/lock code to make sure the lock manager module such as nfsd, is not freed while lock conflict is being resolved. lm_lock_expirable checks and returns true to indicate that the lock conflict can be resolved else return false. This callback must be called with the flc_lock held so it can not block. lm_expire_lock is called to resolve the lock conflict if the returned value from lm_lock_expirable is true. This callback is called without the flc_lock held since it's allowed to block. Upon returning from this callback, the lock conflict should be resolved and the caller is expected to restart the conflict check from the beginnning of the list. Lock manager, such as NFSv4 courteous server, uses this callback to resolve conflict by destroying lock owner, or the NFSv4 courtesy client (client that has expired but allowed to maintains its states) that owns the lock. Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-05-02 14:19:25 -07:00
[PATCH] VFS,fs/locks.c,NFSD4: add race_free posix_lock_file_conf() interface Lockd and the NFSv4 server both exercise a race condition where posix_test_lock() is called either before or after posix_lock_file() to deal with a denied lock request due to a conflicting lock. Remove the race condition for the NFSv4 server by adding a new conflicting lock parameter to __posix_lock_file() , changing the name to __posix_lock_file_conf(). Keep posix_lock_file() interface, add posix_lock_conf() interface, both call __posix_lock_file_conf(). [akpm@osdl.org: Put the EXPORT_SYMBOL() where it belongs] Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-26 01:37:26 -08:00
locks: Rename __locks_copy_lock() to locks_copy_conflock() Jeff advice, " Right now __locks_copy_lock is only used to copy conflocks. It would be good to rename that to something more distinct (i.e.locks_copy_conflock), to make it clear that we're generating a conflock there." v5: change order from 3/6 to 2/6 v4: new patch only renaming function name Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:42 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
locks: wake any locks blocked on request before deadlock check Andreas reported that he was seeing the tdbtorture test fail in some cases with -EDEADLCK when it wasn't before. Some debugging showed that deadlock detection was sometimes discovering the caller's lock request itself in a dependency chain. While we remove the request from the blocked_lock_hash prior to reattempting to acquire it, any locks that are blocked on that request will still be present in the hash and will still have their fl_blocker pointer set to the current request. This causes posix_locks_deadlock to find a deadlock dependency chain when it shouldn't, as a lock request cannot block itself. We are going to end up waking all of those blocked locks anyway when we go to reinsert the request back into the blocked_lock_hash, so just do it prior to checking for deadlocks. This ensures that any lock blocked on the current request will no longer be part of any blocked request chain. URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202975 Fixes: 5946c4319ebb ("fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests.") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-03-25 08:15:14 -04:00
filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Convert __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks to take a struct file_lock_core pointer. While we could do this in another way, we're going to need to add a file_lock() helper function later anyway, so introduce and use it now. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-24-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:05 -05:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-28-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:09 -05:00
fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests. When we find an existing lock which conflicts with a request, and the request wants to wait, we currently add the request to a list. When the lock is removed, the whole list is woken. This can cause the thundering-herd problem. To reduce the problem, we make use of the (new) fact that a pending request can itself have a list of blocked requests. When we find a conflict, we look through the existing blocked requests. If any one of them blocks the new request, the new request is attached below that request, otherwise it is added to the list of blocked requests, which are now known to be mutually non-conflicting. This way, when the lock is released, only a set of non-conflicting locks will be woken, the rest can stay asleep. If the lock request cannot be granted and the request needs to be requeued, all the other requests it blocks will then be woken To make this more concrete: If you have a many-core machine, and have many threads all wanting to briefly lock a give file (udev is known to do this), you can get quite poor performance. When one thread releases a lock, it wakes up all other threads that are waiting (classic thundering-herd) - one will get the lock and the others go to sleep. When you have few cores, this is not very noticeable: by the time the 4th or 5th thread gets enough CPU time to try to claim the lock, the earlier threads have claimed it, done what was needed, and released. So with few cores, many of the threads don't end up contending. With 50+ cores, lost of threads can get the CPU at the same time, and the contention can easily be measured. This patchset creates a tree of pending lock requests in which siblings don't conflict and each lock request does conflict with its parent. When a lock is released, only requests which don't conflict with each other a woken. Testing shows that lock-acquisitions-per-second is now fairly stable even as the number of contending process goes to 1000. Without this patch, locks-per-second drops off steeply after a few 10s of processes. There is a small cost to this extra complexity. At 20 processes running a particular test on 72 cores, the lock acquisitions per second drops from 1.8 million to 1.4 million with this patch. For 100 processes, this patch still provides 1.4 million while without this patch there are about 700,000. Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
locks: protect most of the file_lock handling with i_lock Having a global lock that protects all of this code is a clear scalability problem. Instead of doing that, move most of the code to be protected by the i_lock instead. The exceptions are the global lists that the ->fl_link sits on, and the ->fl_block list. ->fl_link is what connects these structures to the global lists, so we must ensure that we hold those locks when iterating over or updating these lists. Furthermore, sound deadlock detection requires that we hold the blocked_list state steady while checking for loops. We also must ensure that the search and update to the list are atomic. For the checking and insertion side of the blocked_list, push the acquisition of the global lock into __posix_lock_file and ensure that checking and update of the blocked_list is done without dropping the lock in between. On the removal side, when waking up blocked lock waiters, take the global lock before walking the blocked list and dequeue the waiters from the global list prior to removal from the fl_block list. With this, deadlock detection should be race free while we minimize excessive file_lock_lock thrashing. Finally, in order to avoid a lock inversion problem when handling /proc/locks output we must ensure that manipulations of the fl_block list are also protected by the file_lock_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:15 -04:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: remove unnecessary white space. - spaces before tabs, - spaces at the end of lines, - multiple blank lines, - blank lines before EXPORT_SYMBOL, can all go. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
filelock: make posix_same_owner take file_lock_core pointers Change posix_same_owner to take struct file_lock_core pointers, and convert the callers to pass those in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-20-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:01 -05:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: comment cleanups and clarifications Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:12 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
filelock: make posix_same_owner take file_lock_core pointers Change posix_same_owner to take struct file_lock_core pointers, and convert the callers to pass those in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-20-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:01 -05:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
From: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> [PATCH] Fix miscompare in __posix_lock_file If an application requests the same lock twice, the kernel should just leave the existing lock in place. Currently, it will install a second lock of the same type. Signed-off-by: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2005-08-25 16:25:35 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
From: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> [PATCH] Fix miscompare in __posix_lock_file If an application requests the same lock twice, the kernel should just leave the existing lock in place. Currently, it will install a second lock of the same type. Signed-off-by: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2005-08-25 16:25:35 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: make "added" in __posix_lock_file a bool Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:13 -04:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: add some new helper functions In later patches we're going to embed some common fields into a new structure inside struct file_lock. Smooth the transition by adding some new helper functions, and converting the core file locking code to use them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-4-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:45 -05:00
locks: make "added" in __posix_lock_file a bool Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:13 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: don't reuse file_lock in __posix_lock_file Currently in the case where a new file lock completely replaces the old one, we end up overwriting the existing lock with the new info. This means that we have to call fl_release_private inside i_lock. Change the code to instead copy the info to new_fl, insert that lock into the correct spot and then delete the old lock. In a later patch, we'll defer the freeing of the old lock until after the i_lock has been dropped. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-12 08:03:49 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: don't reuse file_lock in __posix_lock_file Currently in the case where a new file lock completely replaces the old one, we end up overwriting the existing lock with the new info. This means that we have to call fl_release_private inside i_lock. Change the code to instead copy the info to new_fl, insert that lock into the correct spot and then delete the old lock. In a later patch, we'll defer the freeing of the old lock until after the i_lock has been dropped. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-12 08:03:49 -04:00
locks: add locks_move_blocks in posix_lock_inode We forget to call locks_move_blocks in posix_lock_inode when try to process same owner and different types. Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2020-06-01 17:16:16 +08:00
locks: don't reuse file_lock in __posix_lock_file Currently in the case where a new file lock completely replaces the old one, we end up overwriting the existing lock with the new info. This means that we have to call fl_release_private inside i_lock. Change the code to instead copy the info to new_fl, insert that lock into the correct spot and then delete the old lock. In a later patch, we'll defer the freeing of the old lock until after the i_lock has been dropped. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-12 08:03:49 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
locks: make "added" in __posix_lock_file a bool Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:13 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] locks: don't unnecessarily fail posix lock operations posix_lock_file() was too cautious, failing operations on OOM, even if they didn't actually require an allocation. This has the disadvantage, that a failing unlock on process exit could lead to a memory leak. There are two possibilites for this: - filesystem implements .lock() and calls back to posix_lock_file(). On cleanup of files_struct locks_remove_posix() is called which should remove all locks belonging to files_struct. However if filesystem calls posix_lock_file() which fails, then those locks will never be freed. - if a file is closed while a lock is blocked, then after acquiring fcntl_setlk() will undo the lock. But this unlock itself might fail on OOM, again possibly leaking the lock. The solution is to move the checking of the allocations until after it is sure that they will be needed. This will solve the above problem since unlock will always succeed unless it splits an existing region. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-23 02:05:09 -07:00
locks: comment cleanups and clarifications Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:12 -04:00
[PATCH] locks: don't unnecessarily fail posix lock operations posix_lock_file() was too cautious, failing operations on OOM, even if they didn't actually require an allocation. This has the disadvantage, that a failing unlock on process exit could lead to a memory leak. There are two possibilites for this: - filesystem implements .lock() and calls back to posix_lock_file(). On cleanup of files_struct locks_remove_posix() is called which should remove all locks belonging to files_struct. However if filesystem calls posix_lock_file() which fails, then those locks will never be freed. - if a file is closed while a lock is blocked, then after acquiring fcntl_setlk() will undo the lock. But this unlock itself might fail on OOM, again possibly leaking the lock. The solution is to move the checking of the allocations until after it is sure that they will be needed. This will solve the above problem since unlock will always succeed unless it splits an existing region. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-23 02:05:09 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: add some new helper functions In later patches we're going to embed some common fields into a new structure inside struct file_lock. Smooth the transition by adding some new helper functions, and converting the core file locking code to use them. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-4-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:45 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
VFS: Allow caller to determine if BSD or posix locks were actually freed Change posix_lock_file_conf(), and flock_lock_file() so that if called with an F_UNLCK argument, and the FL_EXISTS flag they will indicate whether or not any locks were actually freed by returning 0 or -ENOENT. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-06-29 16:38:32 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
VFS: Allow caller to determine if BSD or posix locks were actually freed Change posix_lock_file_conf(), and flock_lock_file() so that if called with an F_UNLCK argument, and the FL_EXISTS flag they will indicate whether or not any locks were actually freed by returning 0 or -ENOENT. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-06-29 16:38:32 -04:00
[PATCH] locks: don't unnecessarily fail posix lock operations posix_lock_file() was too cautious, failing operations on OOM, even if they didn't actually require an allocation. This has the disadvantage, that a failing unlock on process exit could lead to a memory leak. There are two possibilites for this: - filesystem implements .lock() and calls back to posix_lock_file(). On cleanup of files_struct locks_remove_posix() is called which should remove all locks belonging to files_struct. However if filesystem calls posix_lock_file() which fails, then those locks will never be freed. - if a file is closed while a lock is blocked, then after acquiring fcntl_setlk() will undo the lock. But this unlock itself might fail on OOM, again possibly leaking the lock. The solution is to move the checking of the allocations until after it is sure that they will be needed. This will solve the above problem since unlock will always succeed unless it splits an existing region. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-23 02:05:09 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: allow a lock request to block other requests. Currently, a lock can block pending requests, but all pending requests are equal. If lots of pending requests are mutually exclusive, this means they will all be woken up and all but one will fail. This can hurt performance. So we will allow pending requests to block other requests. Only the first request will be woken, and it will wake the others. This patch doesn't implement this fully, but prepares the way. - It acknowledges that a request might be blocking other requests, and when the request is converted to a lock, those blocked requests are moved across. - When a request is requeued or discarded, all blocked requests are woken. - When deadlock-detection looks for the lock which blocks a given request, we follow the chain of ->fl_blocker all the way to the top. Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
locks: fix list insertion when lock is split in two In the case where we're splitting a lock in two, the current code the new "left" lock in the incorrect spot. It's inserted just before "right" when it should instead be inserted just before the new lock. When we add a new lock, set "fl" to that value so that we can add "left" before it. Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-02-17 17:08:23 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert locks_wake_up_blocks to take a file_lock_core pointer Have locks_wake_up_blocks take a file_lock_core pointer, and fix up the callers to pass one in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-30-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:11 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert locks_wake_up_blocks to take a file_lock_core pointer Have locks_wake_up_blocks take a file_lock_core pointer, and fix up the callers to pass one in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-30-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:11 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: fix KASAN: use-after-free in trace_event_raw_event_filelock_lock As following backtrace, the struct file_lock request , in posix_lock_inode is free before ftrace function using. Replace the ftrace function ahead free flow could fix the use-after-free issue. [name:report&]=============================================== BUG:KASAN: use-after-free in trace_event_raw_event_filelock_lock+0x80/0x12c [name:report&]Read at addr f6ffff8025622620 by task NativeThread/16753 [name:report_hw_tags&]Pointer tag: [f6], memory tag: [fe] [name:report&] BT: Hardware name: MT6897 (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xf8/0x148 show_stack+0x18/0x24 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x7c print_report+0x2c8/0xa08 kasan_report+0xb0/0x120 __do_kernel_fault+0xc8/0x248 do_bad_area+0x30/0xdc do_tag_check_fault+0x1c/0x30 do_mem_abort+0x58/0xbc el1_abort+0x3c/0x5c el1h_64_sync_handler+0x54/0x90 el1h_64_sync+0x68/0x6c trace_event_raw_event_filelock_lock+0x80/0x12c posix_lock_inode+0xd0c/0xd60 do_lock_file_wait+0xb8/0x190 fcntl_setlk+0x2d8/0x440 ... [name:report&] [name:report&]Allocated by task 16752: ... slab_post_alloc_hook+0x74/0x340 kmem_cache_alloc+0x1b0/0x2f0 posix_lock_inode+0xb0/0xd60 ... [name:report&] [name:report&]Freed by task 16752: ... kmem_cache_free+0x274/0x5b0 locks_dispose_list+0x3c/0x148 posix_lock_inode+0xc40/0xd60 do_lock_file_wait+0xb8/0x190 fcntl_setlk+0x2d8/0x440 do_fcntl+0x150/0xc18 ... Signed-off-by: Will Shiu <Will.Shiu@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2023-07-21 13:19:04 +08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: defer freeing locks in locks_delete_lock until after i_lock has been dropped In commit 72f98e72551fa (locks: turn lock_flocks into a spinlock), we moved from using the BKL to a global spinlock. With this change, we lost the ability to block in the fl_release_private operation. This is problematic for NFS (and probably some other filesystems as well). Add a new list_head argument to locks_delete_lock. If that argument is non-NULL, then queue any locks that we want to free to the list instead of freeing them. Then, add a new locks_dispose_list function that will walk such a list and call locks_free_lock on them after the i_lock has been dropped. Finally, change all of the callers of locks_delete_lock to pass in a list_head, except for lease_modify. That function can be called long after the i_lock has been acquired. Deferring the freeing of a lease after unlocking it in that function is non-trivial until we overhaul some of the spinlocking in the lease code. Currently though, no filesystem that sets fl_release_private supports leases, so this is not currently a problem. We'll eventually want to make the same change in the lease code, but it needs a lot more work before we can reasonably do so. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 14:20:31 -04:00
locks: sprinkle some tracepoints around the file locking code Add some tracepoints around the POSIX locking code. These were useful when tracking down problems when handling the race between setlk and close. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-06 21:26:10 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: allow {vfs,posix}_lock_file to return conflicting lock The nfsv4 protocol's lock operation, in the case of a conflict, returns information about the conflicting lock. It's unclear how clients can use this, so for now we're not going so far as to add a filesystem method that can return a conflicting lock, but we may as well return something in the local case when it's easy to. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 16:15:35 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
VFS: Allow caller to determine if BSD or posix locks were actually freed Change posix_lock_file_conf(), and flock_lock_file() so that if called with an F_UNLCK argument, and the FL_EXISTS flag they will indicate whether or not any locks were actually freed by returning 0 or -ENOENT. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
2006-06-29 16:38:32 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: allow {vfs,posix}_lock_file to return conflicting lock The nfsv4 protocol's lock operation, in the case of a conflict, returns information about the conflicting lock. It's unclear how clients can use this, so for now we're not going so far as to add a filesystem method that can return a conflicting lock, but we may as well return something in the local case when it's easy to. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 16:15:35 -05:00
[PATCH] VFS,fs/locks.c,NFSD4: add race_free posix_lock_file_conf() interface Lockd and the NFSv4 server both exercise a race condition where posix_test_lock() is called either before or after posix_lock_file() to deal with a denied lock request due to a conflicting lock. Remove the race condition for the NFSv4 server by adding a new conflicting lock parameter to __posix_lock_file() , changing the name to __posix_lock_file_conf(). Keep posix_lock_file() interface, add posix_lock_conf() interface, both call __posix_lock_file_conf(). [akpm@osdl.org: Put the EXPORT_SYMBOL() where it belongs] Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-26 01:37:26 -08:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: allow {vfs,posix}_lock_file to return conflicting lock The nfsv4 protocol's lock operation, in the case of a conflict, returns information about the conflicting lock. It's unclear how clients can use this, so for now we're not going so far as to add a filesystem method that can return a conflicting lock, but we may as well return something in the local case when it's easy to. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 16:15:35 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: new helpers - flock_lock_inode_wait and posix_lock_inode_wait Allow callers to pass in an inode instead of a filp. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Tested-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2015-07-11 06:43:02 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: cleanup posix_lock_inode_wait and flock_lock_inode_wait All callers use locks_lock_inode_wait() instead. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-10-22 13:38:15 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: cleanup posix_lock_inode_wait and flock_lock_inode_wait All callers use locks_lock_inode_wait() instead. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-10-22 13:38:15 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: rename __posix_lock_file to posix_lock_inode ...a more descriptive name and we can drop the double underscore prefix. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-07 18:27:42 -05:00
locks: add special return value for asynchronous locks Use a special error value FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED to mean that a locking operation returned asynchronously. This is returned by posix_lock_file() for sleeping locks to mean that the lock has been queued on the block list, and will be woken up when it might become available and needs to be retried (either fl_lmops->fl_notify() is called or fl_wait is woken up). f_op->lock() to mean either the above, or that the filesystem will call back with fl_lmops->fl_grant() when the result of the locking operation is known. The filesystem can do this for sleeping as well as non-sleeping locks. This is to make sure, that return values of -EAGAIN and -EINPROGRESS by filesystems are not mistaken to mean an asynchronous locking. This also makes error handling in fs/locks.c and lockd/svclock.c slightly cleaner. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:57 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs/locks: always delete_block after waiting. Now that requests can block other requests, we need to be careful to always clean up those blocked requests. Any time that we wait for a request, we might have other requests attached, and when we stop waiting, we must clean them up. If the lock was granted, the requests might have been moved to the new lock, though when merged with a pre-exiting lock, this might not happen. In all cases we don't want blocked locks to remain attached, so we remove them to be safe. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Tested-by: syzbot+a4a3d526b4157113ec6a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: always delete_block after waiting. Now that requests can block other requests, we need to be careful to always clean up those blocked requests. Any time that we wait for a request, we might have other requests attached, and when we stop waiting, we must clean them up. If the lock was granted, the requests might have been moved to the new lock, though when merged with a pre-exiting lock, this might not happen. In all cases we don't want blocked locks to remain attached, so we remove them to be safe. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Tested-by: syzbot+a4a3d526b4157113ec6a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: new helpers - flock_lock_inode_wait and posix_lock_inode_wait Allow callers to pass in an inode instead of a filp. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Tested-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2015-07-11 06:43:02 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-08-23 17:36:59 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: make assign_type helper take a file_lock_core pointer Have assign_type take struct file_lock_core instead of file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-29-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:10 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_wake_up_blocks to take a file_lock_core pointer Have locks_wake_up_blocks take a file_lock_core pointer, and fix up the callers to pass one in. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-30-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:11 -05:00
locks: prevent side-effects of locks_release_private before file_lock is initialized When calling fcntl(fd, F_SETLEASE, lck) [with lck=F_WRLCK or F_RDLCK], the custom signal or owner (if any were previously set using F_SETSIG or F_SETOWN fcntls) would be reset when F_SETLEASE was called for the second time on the same file descriptor. This bug is a regression of 2.6.37 and is described here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43336 This patch reverts a commit from Oct 2004 (with subject "nfs4 lease: move the f_delown processing") which originally introduced the lm_release_private callback. Signed-off-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2012-07-27 00:42:52 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: prevent side-effects of locks_release_private before file_lock is initialized When calling fcntl(fd, F_SETLEASE, lck) [with lck=F_WRLCK or F_RDLCK], the custom signal or owner (if any were previously set using F_SETSIG or F_SETOWN fcntls) would be reset when F_SETLEASE was called for the second time on the same file descriptor. This bug is a regression of 2.6.37 and is described here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43336 This patch reverts a commit from Oct 2004 (with subject "nfs4 lease: move the f_delown processing") which originally introduced the lm_release_private callback. Signed-off-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2012-07-27 00:42:52 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: move lease-specific code out of locks_delete_lock No point putting something only used by one caller into common code. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2012-07-27 16:18:00 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
locks: prevent side-effects of locks_release_private before file_lock is initialized When calling fcntl(fd, F_SETLEASE, lck) [with lck=F_WRLCK or F_RDLCK], the custom signal or owner (if any were previously set using F_SETSIG or F_SETOWN fcntls) would be reset when F_SETLEASE was called for the second time on the same file descriptor. This bug is a regression of 2.6.37 and is described here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43336 This patch reverts a commit from Oct 2004 (with subject "nfs4 lease: move the f_delown processing") which originally introduced the lm_release_private callback. Signed-off-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2012-07-27 00:42:52 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock There was only one place where we still could free a file_lock while holding the i_lock -- lease_modify. Add a new list_head argument to the lm_change operation, pass in a private list when calling it, and fix those callers to dispose of the list once the lock has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 07:12:07 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: move i_lock acquisition into generic_*_lease handlers Now that we have a saner internal API for managing leases, we no longer need to mandate that the inode->i_lock be held over most of the lease code. Push it down into generic_add_lease and generic_delete_lease. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 18:50:48 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: add some tracepoints in the lease handling code v2: add a __break_lease tracepoint for non-blocking case Recently, I needed these to help track down a softlockup when recalling a delegation, but they might be helpful in other situations as well. Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
locks: clean up the lm_change prototype Now that we use standard list_heads for tracking leases, we can have lm_change take a pointer to the lease to be modified instead of a double pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
locks: clean up the lm_change prototype Now that we use standard list_heads for tracking leases, we can have lm_change take a pointer to the lease to be modified instead of a double pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: implement delegations Implement NFSv4 delegations at the vfs level using the new FL_DELEG lock type. Note nfsd is the only delegation user and is only using read delegations. Warn on any attempt to set a write delegation for now. We'll come back to that case later. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-03-05 13:18:59 -05:00
locks: Add trace_leases_conflict Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-06-05 18:45:34 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: Add trace_leases_conflict Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-06-05 18:45:34 -07:00
nfsd: clients don't need to break their own delegations We currently revoke read delegations on any write open or any operation that modifies file data or metadata (including rename, link, and unlink). But if the delegation in question is the only read delegation and is held by the client performing the operation, that's not really necessary. It's not always possible to prevent this in the NFSv4.0 case, because there's not always a way to determine which client an NFSv4.0 delegation came from. (In theory we could try to guess this from the transport layer, e.g., by assuming all traffic on a given TCP connection comes from the same client. But that's not really correct.) In the NFSv4.1 case the session layer always tells us the client. This patch should remove such self-conflicts in all cases where we can reliably determine the client from the compound. To do that we need to track "who" is performing a given (possibly lease-breaking) file operation. We're doing that by storing the information in the svc_rqst and using kthread_data() to map the current task back to a svc_rqst. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2017-07-28 16:35:15 -04:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: Add trace_leases_conflict Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-06-05 18:45:34 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: Add trace_leases_conflict Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-06-05 18:45:34 -07:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: Add trace_leases_conflict Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-06-05 18:45:34 -07:00
locks: implement delegations Implement NFSv4 delegations at the vfs level using the new FL_DELEG lock type. Note nfsd is the only delegation user and is only using read delegations. Warn on any attempt to set a write delegation for now. We'll come back to that case later. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-03-05 13:18:59 -05:00
locks: __break_lease cleanup in preparation of allowing direct removal of leases Eliminate an unneeded "flock" variable. We can use "fl" as a loop cursor everywhere. Add a any_leases_conflict helper function as well to consolidate a bit of code. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 14:53:41 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: __break_lease cleanup in preparation of allowing direct removal of leases Eliminate an unneeded "flock" variable. We can use "fl" as a loop cursor everywhere. Add a any_leases_conflict helper function as well to consolidate a bit of code. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 14:53:41 -04:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: __break_lease cleanup in preparation of allowing direct removal of leases Eliminate an unneeded "flock" variable. We can use "fl" as a loop cursor everywhere. Add a any_leases_conflict helper function as well to consolidate a bit of code. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 14:53:41 -04:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: __break_lease cleanup in preparation of allowing direct removal of leases Eliminate an unneeded "flock" variable. We can use "fl" as a loop cursor everywhere. Add a any_leases_conflict helper function as well to consolidate a bit of code. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 14:53:41 -04:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: __break_lease cleanup in preparation of allowing direct removal of leases Eliminate an unneeded "flock" variable. We can use "fl" as a loop cursor everywhere. Add a any_leases_conflict helper function as well to consolidate a bit of code. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 14:53:41 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: implement delegations Implement NFSv4 delegations at the vfs level using the new FL_DELEG lock type. Note nfsd is the only delegation user and is only using read delegations. Warn on any attempt to set a write delegation for now. We'll come back to that case later. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-03-05 13:18:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
leases: minor break_lease() comment clarification clarify that break_lease() checks for presence of any lock, not just leases. Signed-off-by: David M. Richter <richterd@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-05-09 16:10:27 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: implement delegations Implement NFSv4 delegations at the vfs level using the new FL_DELEG lock type. Note nfsd is the only delegation user and is only using read delegations. Warn on any attempt to set a write delegation for now. We'll come back to that case later. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-03-05 13:18:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
Switch may_open() and break_lease() to passing O_... ... instead of mixing FMODE_ and O_ Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-12-24 06:47:55 -05:00
locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock There was only one place where we still could free a file_lock while holding the i_lock -- lease_modify. Add a new list_head argument to the lm_change operation, pass in a private list when calling it, and fix those callers to dispose of the list once the lock has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 07:12:07 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
Switch may_open() and break_lease() to passing O_... ... instead of mixing FMODE_ and O_ Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-12-24 06:47:55 -05:00
vfs: fix handling of lock allocation failure in lease-break case Bruce Fields notes that commit 778fc546f749 ("locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks") introduced a possible error pointer dereference on failure to allocate memory. locks_conflict() will dereference the passed-in new lease lock structure that may be an error pointer. This means an open (without O_NONBLOCK set) on a file with a lease applied (generally only done when Samba or nfsd (with v4) is running) could crash if a kmalloc() fails. So instead of playing games with IS_ERROR() all over the place, just check the allocation failure early. That makes the code more straightforward, and avoids this possible bad pointer dereference. Based-on-patch-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-12-26 10:25:26 -08:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: add a new locks_inode_context accessor function There are a number of places in the kernel that are accessing the inode->i_flctx field without smp_load_acquire. This is required to ensure that the caller doesn't see a partially-initialized structure. Add a new accessor function for it to make this clear and convert all of the relevant accesses in locks.c to use it. Also, convert locks_free_lock_context to use the helper as well instead of just doing a "bare" assignment. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-16 09:02:30 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: fix a memory leak bug in __break_lease() In __break_lease(), the file lock 'new_fl' is allocated in lease_alloc(). However, it is not deallocated in the following execution if smp_load_acquire() fails, leading to a memory leak bug. To fix this issue, free 'new_fl' before returning the error. Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang <wenwen@cs.uga.edu> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-08-19 18:47:34 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock There was only one place where we still could free a file_lock while holding the i_lock -- lease_modify. Add a new list_head argument to the lm_change operation, pass in a private list when calling it, and fix those callers to dispose of the list once the lock has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 07:12:07 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: __break_lease cleanup in preparation of allowing direct removal of leases Eliminate an unneeded "flock" variable. We can use "fl" as a loop cursor everywhere. Add a any_leases_conflict helper function as well to consolidate a bit of code. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 14:53:41 -04:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-25-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:06 -05:00
locks: implement delegations Implement NFSv4 delegations at the vfs level using the new FL_DELEG lock type. Note nfsd is the only delegation user and is only using read delegations. Warn on any attempt to set a write delegation for now. We'll come back to that case later. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-03-05 13:18:59 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: give lm_break a return value Christoph suggests: "Add a return value to lm_break so that the lock manager can tell the core code "you can delete this lease right now". That gets rid of the games with the timeout which require all kinds of race avoidance code in the users." Do that here and have the nfsd lease break routine use it when it detects that there was a race between setting up the lease and it being broken. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 15:06:54 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: give lm_break a return value Christoph suggests: "Add a return value to lm_break so that the lock manager can tell the core code "you can delete this lease right now". That gets rid of the games with the timeout which require all kinds of race avoidance code in the users." Do that here and have the nfsd lease break routine use it when it detects that there was a race between setting up the lease and it being broken. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 15:06:54 -04:00
locks: remove i_have_this_lease check from __break_lease I think that the intent of this code was to ensure that a process won't deadlock if it has one fd open with a lease on it and then breaks that lease by opening another fd. In that case it'll treat the __break_lease call as if it were non-blocking. This seems wrong -- the process could (for instance) be multithreaded and managing different fds via different threads. I also don't see any mention of this limitation in the (somewhat sketchy) documentation. Remove the check and the non-blocking behavior when i_have_this_lease is true. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-09-01 14:27:43 -04:00
locks: add some tracepoints in the lease handling code v2: add a __break_lease tracepoint for non-blocking case Recently, I needed these to help track down a softlockup when recalling a delegation, but they might be helpful in other situations as well. Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: allow __break_lease to sleep even when break_time is 0 A fl->fl_break_time of 0 has a special meaning to the lease break code that basically means "never break the lease". knfsd uses this to ensure that leases don't disappear out from under it. Unfortunately, the code in __break_lease can end up passing this value to wait_event_interruptible as a timeout, which prevents it from going to sleep at all. This makes __break_lease to spin in a tight loop and causes soft lockups. Fix this by ensuring that we pass a minimum value of 1 as a timeout instead. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Reported-by: Terry Barnaby <terry1@beam.ltd.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-15 06:17:49 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: allow __break_lease to sleep even when break_time is 0 A fl->fl_break_time of 0 has a special meaning to the lease break code that basically means "never break the lease". knfsd uses this to ensure that leases don't disappear out from under it. Unfortunately, the code in __break_lease can end up passing this value to wait_event_interruptible as a timeout, which prevents it from going to sleep at all. This makes __break_lease to spin in a tight loop and causes soft lockups. Fix this by ensuring that we pass a minimum value of 1 as a timeout instead. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Reported-by: Terry Barnaby <terry1@beam.ltd.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-15 06:17:49 -04:00
filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-28-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:09 -05:00
locks: add some tracepoints in the lease handling code v2: add a __break_lease tracepoint for non-blocking case Recently, I needed these to help track down a softlockup when recalling a delegation, but they might be helpful in other situations as well. Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_global with a percpu-rwsem Replace the global part of the lglock with a percpu-rwsem. Since fcl_lock is a spinlock and itself nests under i_lock, which too is a spinlock we cannot acquire sleeping locks at locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks(). We can however wrap all fcl_lock acquisitions with percpu_down_read such that all invocations of locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks() have that read lock held. This allows us to replace the lg_global part of the lglock with the write side of the rwsem. In the absense of writers, percpu_{down,up}_read() are free of atomic instructions. This further avoids the very long preempt-disable regions caused by lglock on larger machines. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:33 +02:00
locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock There was only one place where we still could free a file_lock while holding the i_lock -- lease_modify. Add a new list_head argument to the lm_change operation, pass in a private list when calling it, and fix those callers to dispose of the list once the lock has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 07:12:07 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_global with a percpu-rwsem Replace the global part of the lglock with a percpu-rwsem. Since fcl_lock is a spinlock and itself nests under i_lock, which too is a spinlock we cannot acquire sleeping locks at locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks(). We can however wrap all fcl_lock acquisitions with percpu_down_read such that all invocations of locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks() have that read lock held. This allows us to replace the lg_global part of the lglock with the write side of the rwsem. In the absense of writers, percpu_{down,up}_read() are free of atomic instructions. This further avoids the very long preempt-disable regions caused by lglock on larger machines. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:33 +02:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: add some tracepoints in the lease handling code v2: add a __break_lease tracepoint for non-blocking case Recently, I needed these to help track down a softlockup when recalling a delegation, but they might be helpful in other situations as well. Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
locks: __break_lease cleanup in preparation of allowing direct removal of leases Eliminate an unneeded "flock" variable. We can use "fl" as a loop cursor everywhere. Add a any_leases_conflict helper function as well to consolidate a bit of code. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 14:53:41 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock There was only one place where we still could free a file_lock while holding the i_lock -- lease_modify. Add a new list_head argument to the lm_change operation, pass in a private list when calling it, and fix those callers to dispose of the list once the lock has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 07:12:07 -04:00
locks: fix a memory leak bug in __break_lease() In __break_lease(), the file lock 'new_fl' is allocated in lease_alloc(). However, it is not deallocated in the following execution if smp_load_acquire() fails, leading to a memory leak bug. To fix this issue, free 'new_fl' before returning the error. Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang <wenwen@cs.uga.edu> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-08-19 18:47:34 -05:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
nfsd: encode stat->mtime for getattr instead of inode->i_mtime The values of stat->mtime and inode->i_mtime may differ for overlayfs and stat->mtime is the correct value to use when encoding getattr. This is also consistent with the fact that other attr times are also encoded from stat values. Both callers of lease_get_mtime() already have the value of stat->mtime, so the only needed change is that lease_get_mtime() will not overwrite this value with inode->i_mtime in case the inode does not have an exclusive lease. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2018-01-03 17:14:34 +02:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
nfsd: encode stat->mtime for getattr instead of inode->i_mtime The values of stat->mtime and inode->i_mtime may differ for overlayfs and stat->mtime is the correct value to use when encoding getattr. This is also consistent with the fact that other attr times are also encoded from stat values. Both callers of lease_get_mtime() already have the value of stat->mtime, so the only needed change is that lease_get_mtime() will not overwrite this value with inode->i_mtime in case the inode does not have an exclusive lease. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2018-01-03 17:14:34 +02:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs: fix kernel-doc notation warnings Fix kernel-doc notation warnings in fs/. Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/super.c:560): missing initial short description on line: * mark_files_ro Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/locks.c:1277): missing initial short description on line: * lease_get_mtime Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/locks.c:1277): missing initial short description on line: * lease_get_mtime Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/namei.c:1368): missing initial short description on line: * lookup_one_len: filesystem helper to lookup single pathname component Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/buffer.c:3221): missing initial short description on line: * bh_uptodate_or_lock: Test whether the buffer is uptodate Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/buffer.c:3240): missing initial short description on line: * bh_submit_read: Submit a locked buffer for reading Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/fs-writeback.c:30): missing initial short description on line: * writeback_acquire: attempt to get exclusive writeback access to a device Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/fs-writeback.c:47): missing initial short description on line: * writeback_in_progress: determine whether there is writeback in progress Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/fs-writeback.c:58): missing initial short description on line: * writeback_release: relinquish exclusive writeback access against a device. Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//include/linux/jbd.h:351): contents before sections Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//include/linux/jbd.h:561): contents before sections Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/jbd/transaction.c:1935): missing initial short description on line: * void journal_invalidatepage() Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-03-19 17:01:00 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
vfs: change inode times to use struct timespec64 struct timespec is not y2038 safe. Transition vfs to use y2038 safe struct timespec64 instead. The change was made with the help of the following cocinelle script. This catches about 80% of the changes. All the header file and logic changes are included in the first 5 rules. The rest are trivial substitutions. I avoid changing any of the function signatures or any other filesystem specific data structures to keep the patch simple for review. The script can be a little shorter by combining different cases. But, this version was sufficient for my usecase. virtual patch @ depends on patch @ identifier now; @@ - struct timespec + struct timespec64 current_time ( ... ) { - struct timespec now = current_kernel_time(); + struct timespec64 now = current_kernel_time64(); ... - return timespec_trunc( + return timespec64_trunc( ... ); } @ depends on patch @ identifier xtime; @@ struct \( iattr \| inode \| kstat \) { ... - struct timespec xtime; + struct timespec64 xtime; ... } @ depends on patch @ identifier t; @@ struct inode_operations { ... int (*update_time) (..., - struct timespec t, + struct timespec64 t, ...); ... } @ depends on patch @ identifier t; identifier fn_update_time =~ "update_time$"; @@ fn_update_time (..., - struct timespec *t, + struct timespec64 *t, ...) { ... } @ depends on patch @ identifier t; @@ lease_get_mtime( ... , - struct timespec *t + struct timespec64 *t ) { ... } @te depends on patch forall@ identifier ts; local idexpression struct inode *inode_node; identifier i_xtime =~ "^i_[acm]time$"; identifier ia_xtime =~ "^ia_[acm]time$"; identifier fn_update_time =~ "update_time$"; identifier fn; expression e, E3; local idexpression struct inode *node1; local idexpression struct inode *node2; local idexpression struct iattr *attr1; local idexpression struct iattr *attr2; local idexpression struct iattr attr; identifier i_xtime1 =~ "^i_[acm]time$"; identifier i_xtime2 =~ "^i_[acm]time$"; identifier ia_xtime1 =~ "^ia_[acm]time$"; identifier ia_xtime2 =~ "^ia_[acm]time$"; @@ ( ( - struct timespec ts; + struct timespec64 ts; | - struct timespec ts = current_time(inode_node); + struct timespec64 ts = current_time(inode_node); ) <+... when != ts ( - timespec_equal(&inode_node->i_xtime, &ts) + timespec64_equal(&inode_node->i_xtime, &ts) | - timespec_equal(&ts, &inode_node->i_xtime) + timespec64_equal(&ts, &inode_node->i_xtime) | - timespec_compare(&inode_node->i_xtime, &ts) + timespec64_compare(&inode_node->i_xtime, &ts) | - timespec_compare(&ts, &inode_node->i_xtime) + timespec64_compare(&ts, &inode_node->i_xtime) | ts = current_time(e) | fn_update_time(..., &ts,...) | inode_node->i_xtime = ts | node1->i_xtime = ts | ts = inode_node->i_xtime | <+... attr1->ia_xtime ...+> = ts | ts = attr1->ia_xtime | ts.tv_sec | ts.tv_nsec | btrfs_set_stack_timespec_sec(..., ts.tv_sec) | btrfs_set_stack_timespec_nsec(..., ts.tv_nsec) | - ts = timespec64_to_timespec( + ts = ... -) | - ts = ktime_to_timespec( + ts = ktime_to_timespec64( ...) | - ts = E3 + ts = timespec_to_timespec64(E3) | - ktime_get_real_ts(&ts) + ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts) | fn(..., - ts + timespec64_to_timespec(ts) ,...) ) ...+> ( <... when != ts - return ts; + return timespec64_to_timespec(ts); ...> ) | - timespec_equal(&node1->i_xtime1, &node2->i_xtime2) + timespec64_equal(&node1->i_xtime2, &node2->i_xtime2) | - timespec_equal(&node1->i_xtime1, &attr2->ia_xtime2) + timespec64_equal(&node1->i_xtime2, &attr2->ia_xtime2) | - timespec_compare(&node1->i_xtime1, &node2->i_xtime2) + timespec64_compare(&node1->i_xtime1, &node2->i_xtime2) | node1->i_xtime1 = - timespec_trunc(attr1->ia_xtime1, + timespec64_trunc(attr1->ia_xtime1, ...) | - attr1->ia_xtime1 = timespec_trunc(attr2->ia_xtime2, + attr1->ia_xtime1 = timespec64_trunc(attr2->ia_xtime2, ...) | - ktime_get_real_ts(&attr1->ia_xtime1) + ktime_get_real_ts64(&attr1->ia_xtime1) | - ktime_get_real_ts(&attr.ia_xtime1) + ktime_get_real_ts64(&attr.ia_xtime1) ) @ depends on patch @ struct inode *node; struct iattr *attr; identifier fn; identifier i_xtime =~ "^i_[acm]time$"; identifier ia_xtime =~ "^ia_[acm]time$"; expression e; @@ ( - fn(node->i_xtime); + fn(timespec64_to_timespec(node->i_xtime)); | fn(..., - node->i_xtime); + timespec64_to_timespec(node->i_xtime)); | - e = fn(attr->ia_xtime); + e = fn(timespec64_to_timespec(attr->ia_xtime)); ) @ depends on patch forall @ struct inode *node; struct iattr *attr; identifier i_xtime =~ "^i_[acm]time$"; identifier ia_xtime =~ "^ia_[acm]time$"; identifier fn; @@ { + struct timespec ts; <+... ( + ts = timespec64_to_timespec(node->i_xtime); fn (..., - &node->i_xtime, + &ts, ...); | + ts = timespec64_to_timespec(attr->ia_xtime); fn (..., - &attr->ia_xtime, + &ts, ...); ) ...+> } @ depends on patch forall @ struct inode *node; struct iattr *attr; struct kstat *stat; identifier ia_xtime =~ "^ia_[acm]time$"; identifier i_xtime =~ "^i_[acm]time$"; identifier xtime =~ "^[acm]time$"; identifier fn, ret; @@ { + struct timespec ts; <+... ( + ts = timespec64_to_timespec(node->i_xtime); ret = fn (..., - &node->i_xtime, + &ts, ...); | + ts = timespec64_to_timespec(node->i_xtime); ret = fn (..., - &node->i_xtime); + &ts); | + ts = timespec64_to_timespec(attr->ia_xtime); ret = fn (..., - &attr->ia_xtime, + &ts, ...); | + ts = timespec64_to_timespec(attr->ia_xtime); ret = fn (..., - &attr->ia_xtime); + &ts); | + ts = timespec64_to_timespec(stat->xtime); ret = fn (..., - &stat->xtime); + &ts); ) ...+> } @ depends on patch @ struct inode *node; struct inode *node2; identifier i_xtime1 =~ "^i_[acm]time$"; identifier i_xtime2 =~ "^i_[acm]time$"; identifier i_xtime3 =~ "^i_[acm]time$"; struct iattr *attrp; struct iattr *attrp2; struct iattr attr ; identifier ia_xtime1 =~ "^ia_[acm]time$"; identifier ia_xtime2 =~ "^ia_[acm]time$"; struct kstat *stat; struct kstat stat1; struct timespec64 ts; identifier xtime =~ "^[acmb]time$"; expression e; @@ ( ( node->i_xtime2 \| attrp->ia_xtime2 \| attr.ia_xtime2 \) = node->i_xtime1 ; | node->i_xtime2 = \( node2->i_xtime1 \| timespec64_trunc(...) \); | node->i_xtime2 = node->i_xtime1 = node->i_xtime3 = \(ts \| current_time(...) \); | node->i_xtime1 = node->i_xtime3 = \(ts \| current_time(...) \); | stat->xtime = node2->i_xtime1; | stat1.xtime = node2->i_xtime1; | ( node->i_xtime2 \| attrp->ia_xtime2 \) = attrp->ia_xtime1 ; | ( attrp->ia_xtime1 \| attr.ia_xtime1 \) = attrp2->ia_xtime2; | - e = node->i_xtime1; + e = timespec64_to_timespec( node->i_xtime1 ); | - e = attrp->ia_xtime1; + e = timespec64_to_timespec( attrp->ia_xtime1 ); | node->i_xtime1 = current_time(...); | node->i_xtime2 = node->i_xtime1 = node->i_xtime3 = - e; + timespec_to_timespec64(e); | node->i_xtime1 = node->i_xtime3 = - e; + timespec_to_timespec64(e); | - node->i_xtime1 = e; + node->i_xtime1 = timespec_to_timespec64(e); ) Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: <anton@tuxera.com> Cc: <balbi@kernel.org> Cc: <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Cc: <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: <dsterba@suse.com> Cc: <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: <hch@lst.de> Cc: <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> Cc: <hubcap@omnibond.com> Cc: <jack@suse.com> Cc: <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu> Cc: <jslaby@suse.com> Cc: <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: <mark@fasheh.com> Cc: <miklos@szeredi.hu> Cc: <nico@linaro.org> Cc: <reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: <richard@nod.at> Cc: <sage@redhat.com> Cc: <sfrench@samba.org> Cc: <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: <tj@kernel.org> Cc: <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2018-05-08 19:36:02 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: close potential race in lease_get_mtime lease_get_mtime is called without the i_lock held, so there's no guarantee about the stability of the list. Between the time when we assign "flock" and then dereference it to check whether it's a lease and for write, the lease could be freed. Ensure that that doesn't occur by taking the i_lock before trying to check the lease. Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:18:44 -04:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: close potential race in lease_get_mtime lease_get_mtime is called without the i_lock held, so there's no guarantee about the stability of the list. Between the time when we assign "flock" and then dereference it to check whether it's a lease and for write, the lease could be freed. Ensure that that doesn't occur by taking the i_lock before trying to check the lease. Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:18:44 -04:00
filelock: add a new locks_inode_context accessor function There are a number of places in the kernel that are accessing the inode->i_flctx field without smp_load_acquire. This is required to ensure that the caller doesn't see a partially-initialized structure. Add a new accessor function for it to make this clear and convert all of the relevant accesses in locks.c to use it. Also, convert locks_free_lock_context to use the helper as well instead of just doing a "bare" assignment. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-16 09:02:30 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: use list_first_entry_or_null() Simplify the code with list_first_entry_or_null(). Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-11-18 21:40:33 +08:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: close potential race in lease_get_mtime lease_get_mtime is called without the i_lock held, so there's no guarantee about the stability of the list. Between the time when we assign "flock" and then dereference it to check whether it's a lease and for write, the lease could be freed. Ensure that that doesn't occur by taking the i_lock before trying to check the lease. Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:18:44 -04:00
fs: Replace current_fs_time() with current_time() current_fs_time() uses struct super_block* as an argument. As per Linus's suggestion, this is changed to take struct inode* as a parameter instead. This is because the function is primarily meant for vfs inode timestamps. Also the function was renamed as per Arnd's suggestion. Change all calls to current_fs_time() to use the new current_time() function instead. current_fs_time() will be deleted. Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2016-09-14 07:48:06 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock There was only one place where we still could free a file_lock while holding the i_lock -- lease_modify. Add a new list_head argument to the lm_change operation, pass in a private list when calling it, and fix those callers to dispose of the list once the lock has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 07:12:07 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: add a new locks_inode_context accessor function There are a number of places in the kernel that are accessing the inode->i_flctx field without smp_load_acquire. This is required to ensure that the caller doesn't see a partially-initialized structure. Add a new accessor function for it to make this clear and convert all of the relevant accesses in locks.c to use it. Also, convert locks_free_lock_context to use the helper as well instead of just doing a "bare" assignment. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-16 09:02:30 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: fix file locking on overlayfs This patch allows flock, posix locks, ofd locks and leases to work correctly on overlayfs. Instead of using the underlying inode for storing lock context use the overlay inode. This allows locks to be persistent across copy-up. This is done by introducing locks_inode() helper and using it instead of file_inode() to get the inode in locking code. For non-overlayfs the two are equivalent, except for an extra pointer dereference in locks_inode(). Since lock operations are in "struct file_operations" we must also make sure not to call underlying filesystem's lock operations. Introcude a super block flag MS_NOREMOTELOCK to this effect. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-09-16 12:44:20 +02:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-26 18:25:49 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locking, fs/locks: Add missing file_sem locks I overlooked a few code-paths that can lead to locks_delete_global_locks(). Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161008081228.GF3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-08 10:12:28 +02:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
locks: eliminate false positive conflicts for write lease check_conflicting_open() is checking for existing fd's open for read or for write before allowing to take a write lease. The check that was implemented using i_count and d_count is an approximation that has several false positives. For example, overlayfs since v4.19, takes an extra reference on the dentry; An open with O_PATH takes a reference on the dentry although the file cannot be read nor written. Change the implementation to use i_readcount and i_writecount to eliminate the false positive conflicts and allow a write lease to be taken on an overlayfs file. The change of behavior with existing fd's open with O_PATH is symmetric w.r.t. current behavior of lease breakers - an open with O_PATH currently does not break a write lease. This increases the size of struct inode by 4 bytes on 32bit archs when CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING is defined and CONFIG_IMA was not already defined. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-06-07 17:24:38 +03:00
fs/locks: remove unnecessary white space. - spaces before tabs, - spaces at the end of lines, - multiple blank lines, - blank lines before EXPORT_SYMBOL, can all go. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
locks: eliminate false positive conflicts for write lease check_conflicting_open() is checking for existing fd's open for read or for write before allowing to take a write lease. The check that was implemented using i_count and d_count is an approximation that has several false positives. For example, overlayfs since v4.19, takes an extra reference on the dentry; An open with O_PATH takes a reference on the dentry although the file cannot be read nor written. Change the implementation to use i_readcount and i_writecount to eliminate the false positive conflicts and allow a write lease to be taken on an overlayfs file. The change of behavior with existing fd's open with O_PATH is symmetric w.r.t. current behavior of lease breakers - an open with O_PATH currently does not break a write lease. This increases the size of struct inode by 4 bytes on 32bit archs when CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING is defined and CONFIG_IMA was not already defined. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-06-07 17:24:38 +03:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
fs: fix fs/locks.c kernel-doc warning Fix kernel-doc warnings in fs/locks.c: Warning(..//fs/locks.c:1577): No description found for parameter 'flags' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-08-09 18:43:17 -07:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
fs: Pass argument to fcntl_setlease as int The interface for fcntl expects the argument passed for the command F_SETLEASE to be of type int. The current code wrongly treats it as a long. In order to avoid access to undefined bits, we should explicitly cast the argument to int. Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Brodsky <Kevin.Brodsky@arm.com> Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com> Cc: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-morello@op-lists.linaro.org Signed-off-by: Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com> Message-Id: <20230414152459.816046-3-Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2023-02-01 15:05:33 +00:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
locks: eliminate false positive conflicts for write lease check_conflicting_open() is checking for existing fd's open for read or for write before allowing to take a write lease. The check that was implemented using i_count and d_count is an approximation that has several false positives. For example, overlayfs since v4.19, takes an extra reference on the dentry; An open with O_PATH takes a reference on the dentry although the file cannot be read nor written. Change the implementation to use i_readcount and i_writecount to eliminate the false positive conflicts and allow a write lease to be taken on an overlayfs file. The change of behavior with existing fd's open with O_PATH is symmetric w.r.t. current behavior of lease breakers - an open with O_PATH currently does not break a write lease. This increases the size of struct inode by 4 bytes on 32bit archs when CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING is defined and CONFIG_IMA was not already defined. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-06-07 17:24:38 +03:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
fs: add FL_LAYOUT lease type This (ab-)uses the file locking code to allow filesystems to recall outstanding pNFS layouts on a file. This new lease type is similar but not quite the same as FL_DELEG. A FL_LAYOUT lease can always be granted, an a per-filesystem lock (XFS iolock for the initial implementation) ensures not FL_LAYOUT leases granted when we would need to recall them. Also included are changes that allow multiple outstanding read leases of different types on the same file as long as they have a differnt owner. This wasn't a problem until now as nfsd never set FL_LEASE leases, and no one else used FL_DELEG leases, but given that nfsd will also issues FL_LAYOUT leases we will have to handle it now. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-21 19:17:03 +01:00
nfsd: grant read delegations to clients holding writes It's OK to grant a read delegation to a client that holds a write, as long as it's the only client holding the write. We originally tried to do this in commit 94415b06eb8a ("nfsd4: a client's own opens needn't prevent delegations"), which had to be reverted in commit 6ee65a773096 ("Revert "nfsd4: a client's own opens needn't prevent delegations""). Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
2021-04-16 14:00:18 -04:00
fs: add FL_LAYOUT lease type This (ab-)uses the file locking code to allow filesystems to recall outstanding pNFS layouts on a file. This new lease type is similar but not quite the same as FL_DELEG. A FL_LAYOUT lease can always be granted, an a per-filesystem lock (XFS iolock for the initial implementation) ensures not FL_LAYOUT leases granted when we would need to recall them. Also included are changes that allow multiple outstanding read leases of different types on the same file as long as they have a differnt owner. This wasn't a problem until now as nfsd never set FL_LEASE leases, and no one else used FL_DELEG leases, but given that nfsd will also issues FL_LAYOUT leases we will have to handle it now. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-21 19:17:03 +01:00
locks: eliminate false positive conflicts for write lease check_conflicting_open() is checking for existing fd's open for read or for write before allowing to take a write lease. The check that was implemented using i_count and d_count is an approximation that has several false positives. For example, overlayfs since v4.19, takes an extra reference on the dentry; An open with O_PATH takes a reference on the dentry although the file cannot be read nor written. Change the implementation to use i_readcount and i_writecount to eliminate the false positive conflicts and allow a write lease to be taken on an overlayfs file. The change of behavior with existing fd's open with O_PATH is symmetric w.r.t. current behavior of lease breakers - an open with O_PATH currently does not break a write lease. This increases the size of struct inode by 4 bytes on 32bit archs when CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING is defined and CONFIG_IMA was not already defined. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-06-07 17:24:38 +03:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
locks: eliminate false positive conflicts for write lease check_conflicting_open() is checking for existing fd's open for read or for write before allowing to take a write lease. The check that was implemented using i_count and d_count is an approximation that has several false positives. For example, overlayfs since v4.19, takes an extra reference on the dentry; An open with O_PATH takes a reference on the dentry although the file cannot be read nor written. Change the implementation to use i_readcount and i_writecount to eliminate the false positive conflicts and allow a write lease to be taken on an overlayfs file. The change of behavior with existing fd's open with O_PATH is symmetric w.r.t. current behavior of lease breakers - an open with O_PATH currently does not break a write lease. This increases the size of struct inode by 4 bytes on 32bit archs when CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING is defined and CONFIG_IMA was not already defined. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-06-07 17:24:38 +03:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
locks: eliminate false positive conflicts for write lease check_conflicting_open() is checking for existing fd's open for read or for write before allowing to take a write lease. The check that was implemented using i_count and d_count is an approximation that has several false positives. For example, overlayfs since v4.19, takes an extra reference on the dentry; An open with O_PATH takes a reference on the dentry although the file cannot be read nor written. Change the implementation to use i_readcount and i_writecount to eliminate the false positive conflicts and allow a write lease to be taken on an overlayfs file. The change of behavior with existing fd's open with O_PATH is symmetric w.r.t. current behavior of lease breakers - an open with O_PATH currently does not break a write lease. This increases the size of struct inode by 4 bytes on 32bit archs when CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING is defined and CONFIG_IMA was not already defined. Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-06-07 17:24:38 +03:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
locks: plumb a "priv" pointer into the setlease routines In later patches, we're going to add a new lock_manager_operation to finish setting up the lease while still holding the i_lock. To do this, we'll need to pass a little bit of info in the fcntl setlease case (primarily an fasync structure). Plumb the extra pointer into there in advance of that. We declare this pointer as a void ** to make it clear that this is private info, and that the caller isn't required to set this unless the lm_setup specifically requires it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:40:25 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: setlease cleanup There's an incorrect comment here. Also clean up the logic: the "rdlease" and "wrlease" locals are confusingly named, and don't really add anything since we can make a decision as soon as we hit one of these cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-08-19 10:59:49 -04:00
locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock There was only one place where we still could free a file_lock while holding the i_lock -- lease_modify. Add a new list_head argument to the lm_change operation, pass in a private list when calling it, and fix those callers to dispose of the list once the lock has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 07:12:07 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix leaks on setlease errors We're depending on setlease to free the passed-in lease on failure. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-10-30 17:31:14 -04:00
locks: add some tracepoints in the lease handling code v2: add a __break_lease tracepoint for non-blocking case Recently, I needed these to help track down a softlockup when recalling a delegation, but they might be helpful in other situations as well. Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
locks: don't allocate a lock context for an F_UNLCK request In the event that we get an F_UNLCK request on an inode that has no lock context, there is no reason to allocate one. Change locks_get_lock_context to take a "type" pointer and avoid allocating a new context if it's F_UNLCK. Then, fix the callers to return appropriately if that function returns NULL. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-04-03 09:04:03 -04:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: implement delegations Implement NFSv4 delegations at the vfs level using the new FL_DELEG lock type. Note nfsd is the only delegation user and is only using read delegations. Warn on any attempt to set a write delegation for now. We'll come back to that case later. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-03-05 13:18:59 -05:00
wrappers for ->i_mutex access parallel to mutex_{lock,unlock,trylock,is_locked,lock_nested}, inode_foo(inode) being mutex_foo(&inode->i_mutex). Please, use those for access to ->i_mutex; over the coming cycle ->i_mutex will become rwsem, with ->lookup() done with it held only shared. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2016-01-22 15:40:57 -05:00
locks: implement delegations Implement NFSv4 delegations at the vfs level using the new FL_DELEG lock type. Note nfsd is the only delegation user and is only using read delegations. Warn on any attempt to set a write delegation for now. We'll come back to that case later. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-03-05 13:18:59 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock There was only one place where we still could free a file_lock while holding the i_lock -- lease_modify. Add a new list_head argument to the lm_change operation, pass in a private list when calling it, and fix those callers to dispose of the list once the lock has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 07:12:07 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
locks: fix leaks on setlease errors We're depending on setlease to free the passed-in lease on failure. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-10-30 17:31:14 -04:00
locks: share more common lease code Share more code between setlease (used by nfsd) and fcntl. Also some minor cleanup. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
2007-05-31 17:03:46 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: setlease cleanup There's an incorrect comment here. Also clean up the logic: the "rdlease" and "wrlease" locals are confusingly named, and don't really add anything since we can make a decision as soon as we hit one of these cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-08-19 10:59:49 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: setlease cleanup There's an incorrect comment here. Also clean up the logic: the "rdlease" and "wrlease" locals are confusingly named, and don't really add anything since we can make a decision as soon as we hit one of these cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-08-19 10:59:49 -04:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: setlease cleanup There's an incorrect comment here. Also clean up the logic: the "rdlease" and "wrlease" locals are confusingly named, and don't really add anything since we can make a decision as soon as we hit one of these cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-08-19 10:59:49 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: setlease cleanup There's an incorrect comment here. Also clean up the logic: the "rdlease" and "wrlease" locals are confusingly named, and don't really add anything since we can make a decision as soon as we hit one of these cases. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-08-19 10:59:49 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: fix fasync_struct memory leak in lease upgrade/downgrade handling Commit 8634b51f6ca2 (locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context) introduced a regression in the handling of lease upgrade/downgrades. In the event that we already have a lease on a file and are going to either upgrade or downgrade it, we skip doing any list insertion or deletion and simply re-call lm_setup on the existing lease. As of commit 8634b51f6ca2 however, we end up calling lm_setup on the lease that was passed in, instead of on the existing lease. This causes us to leak the fasync_struct that was allocated in the event that there was not already an existing one (as it always appeared that there wasn't one). Fixes: 8634b51f6ca2 (locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context) Reported-and-Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-03-04 17:34:32 -05:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
locks: close potential race between setlease and open As Al Viro points out, there is an unlikely, but possible race between opening a file and setting a lease on it. generic_add_lease is done with the i_lock held, but the inode->i_flock check in break_lease is lockless. It's possible for another task doing an open to do the entire pathwalk and call break_lease between the point where generic_add_lease checks for a conflicting open and adds the lease to the list. If this occurs, we can end up with a lease set on the file with a conflicting open. To guard against that, check again for a conflicting open after adding the lease to the i_flock list. If the above race occurs, then we can simply unwind the lease setting and return -EAGAIN. Because we take dentry references and acquire write access on the file before calling break_lease, we know that if the i_flock list is empty when the open caller goes to check it then the necessary refcounts have already been incremented. Thus the additional check for a conflicting open will see that there is one and the setlease call will fail. Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
2014-02-03 12:13:06 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Have these functions take a file_lock_core pointer instead of a file_lock. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-31-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:12 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock There was only one place where we still could free a file_lock while holding the i_lock -- lease_modify. Add a new list_head argument to the lm_change operation, pass in a private list when calling it, and fix those callers to dispose of the list once the lock has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 07:12:07 -04:00
locks: implement delegations Implement NFSv4 delegations at the vfs level using the new FL_DELEG lock type. Note nfsd is the only delegation user and is only using read delegations. Warn on any attempt to set a write delegation for now. We'll come back to that case later. Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-03-05 13:18:59 -05:00
wrappers for ->i_mutex access parallel to mutex_{lock,unlock,trylock,is_locked,lock_nested}, inode_foo(inode) being mutex_foo(&inode->i_mutex). Please, use those for access to ->i_mutex; over the coming cycle ->i_mutex will become rwsem, with ->lookup() done with it held only shared. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2016-01-22 15:40:57 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
leases: split up generic_setlease into lock/unlock cases Eventually we should probably do the same thing to the file operations as well. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-09-21 08:34:32 -04:00
fs: track fl_owner for leases Just like for other lock types we should allow different owners to have a read lease on a file. Currently this can't happen, but with the addition of pNFS layout leases we'll need this feature. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-21 19:14:02 +01:00
leases: split up generic_setlease into lock/unlock cases Eventually we should probably do the same thing to the file operations as well. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-09-21 08:34:32 -04:00
locks: generic_delete_lease doesn't need a file_lock at all Ensure that it's OK to pass in a NULL file_lock double pointer on a F_UNLCK request and convert the vfs_setlease F_UNLCK callers to do just that. Finally, turn the BUG_ON in generic_setlease into a WARN_ON_ONCE with an error return. That's a problem we can handle without crashing the box if it occurs. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:18:45 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock There was only one place where we still could free a file_lock while holding the i_lock -- lease_modify. Add a new list_head argument to the lm_change operation, pass in a private list when calling it, and fix those callers to dispose of the list once the lock has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 07:12:07 -04:00
leases: split up generic_setlease into lock/unlock cases Eventually we should probably do the same thing to the file operations as well. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-09-21 08:34:32 -04:00
filelock: add a new locks_inode_context accessor function There are a number of places in the kernel that are accessing the inode->i_flctx field without smp_load_acquire. This is required to ensure that the caller doesn't see a partially-initialized structure. Add a new accessor function for it to make this clear and convert all of the relevant accesses in locks.c to use it. Also, convert locks_free_lock_context to use the helper as well instead of just doing a "bare" assignment. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-16 09:02:30 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: generic_delete_lease doesn't need a file_lock at all Ensure that it's OK to pass in a NULL file_lock double pointer on a F_UNLCK request and convert the vfs_setlease F_UNLCK callers to do just that. Finally, turn the BUG_ON in generic_setlease into a WARN_ON_ONCE with an error return. That's a problem we can handle without crashing the box if it occurs. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:18:45 -04:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
leases: split up generic_setlease into lock/unlock cases Eventually we should probably do the same thing to the file operations as well. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-09-21 08:34:32 -04:00
locks: fix generic_delete_lease tracepoint to use victim pointer It's possible that "fl" won't point at a valid lock at this point, so use "victim" instead which is either a valid lock or NULL. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-03-14 09:45:35 -04:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: clean up the lm_change prototype Now that we use standard list_heads for tracking leases, we can have lm_change take a pointer to the lease to be modified instead of a double pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock There was only one place where we still could free a file_lock while holding the i_lock -- lease_modify. Add a new list_head argument to the lm_change operation, pass in a private list when calling it, and fix those callers to dispose of the list once the lock has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-01 07:12:07 -04:00
locks: generic_delete_lease doesn't need a file_lock at all Ensure that it's OK to pass in a NULL file_lock double pointer on a F_UNLCK request and convert the vfs_setlease F_UNLCK callers to do just that. Finally, turn the BUG_ON in generic_setlease into a WARN_ON_ONCE with an error return. That's a problem we can handle without crashing the box if it occurs. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:18:45 -04:00
leases: split up generic_setlease into lock/unlock cases Eventually we should probably do the same thing to the file operations as well. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-09-21 08:34:32 -04:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
leases: split up generic_setlease into lock/unlock cases Eventually we should probably do the same thing to the file operations as well. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-09-21 08:34:32 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: plumb a "priv" pointer into the setlease routines In later patches, we're going to add a new lock_manager_operation to finish setting up the lease while still holding the i_lock. To do this, we'll need to pass a little bit of info in the fcntl setlease case (primarily an fasync structure). Plumb the extra pointer into there in advance of that. We declare this pointer as a void ** to make it clear that this is private info, and that the caller isn't required to set this unless the lm_setup specifically requires it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:40:25 -04:00
leases: split up generic_setlease into lock/unlock cases Eventually we should probably do the same thing to the file operations as well. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-09-21 08:34:32 -04:00
fs: track fl_owner for leases Just like for other lock types we should allow different owners to have a read lease on a file. Currently this can't happen, but with the addition of pNFS layout leases we'll need this feature. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-21 19:14:02 +01:00
leases: split up generic_setlease into lock/unlock cases Eventually we should probably do the same thing to the file operations as well. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-09-21 08:34:32 -04:00
locks: generic_delete_lease doesn't need a file_lock at all Ensure that it's OK to pass in a NULL file_lock double pointer on a F_UNLCK request and convert the vfs_setlease F_UNLCK callers to do just that. Finally, turn the BUG_ON in generic_setlease into a WARN_ON_ONCE with an error return. That's a problem we can handle without crashing the box if it occurs. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:18:45 -04:00
fs: add FL_LAYOUT lease type This (ab-)uses the file locking code to allow filesystems to recall outstanding pNFS layouts on a file. This new lease type is similar but not quite the same as FL_DELEG. A FL_LAYOUT lease can always be granted, an a per-filesystem lock (XFS iolock for the initial implementation) ensures not FL_LAYOUT leases granted when we would need to recall them. Also included are changes that allow multiple outstanding read leases of different types on the same file as long as they have a differnt owner. This wasn't a problem until now as nfsd never set FL_LEASE leases, and no one else used FL_DELEG leases, but given that nfsd will also issues FL_LAYOUT leases we will have to handle it now. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-21 19:17:03 +01:00
locks: plumb a "priv" pointer into the setlease routines In later patches, we're going to add a new lock_manager_operation to finish setting up the lease while still holding the i_lock. To do this, we'll need to pass a little bit of info in the fcntl setlease case (primarily an fasync structure). Plumb the extra pointer into there in advance of that. We declare this pointer as a void ** to make it clear that this is private info, and that the caller isn't required to set this unless the lm_setup specifically requires it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:40:25 -04:00
leases: split up generic_setlease into lock/unlock cases Eventually we should probably do the same thing to the file operations as well. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-09-21 08:34:32 -04:00
Remove easily user-triggerable BUG from generic_setlease This can be trivially triggered from userspace by passing in something unexpected. kernel BUG at fs/locks.c:1468! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:generic_setlease+0xc2/0x100 Call Trace: __vfs_setlease+0x35/0x40 fcntl_setlease+0x76/0x150 sys_fcntl+0x1c6/0x810 system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 3.2+ Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-07-13 13:35:36 -04:00
leases: split up generic_setlease into lock/unlock cases Eventually we should probably do the same thing to the file operations as well. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-09-21 08:34:32 -04:00
rename setlease to generic_setlease Make it a little more clear that this is the default implementation for the setleast operation. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-31 00:39:22 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: create a new notifier chain for lease attempts With the new file caching infrastructure in nfsd, we can end up holding files open for an indefinite period of time, even when they are still idle. This may prevent the kernel from handing out leases on the file, which is something we don't want to block. Fix this by running a SRCU notifier call chain whenever on any lease attempt. nfsd can then purge the cache for that inode before returning. Since SRCU is only conditionally compiled in, we must only define the new chain if it's enabled, and users of the chain must ensure that SRCU is enabled. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2019-08-18 14:18:45 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: create a new notifier chain for lease attempts With the new file caching infrastructure in nfsd, we can end up holding files open for an indefinite period of time, even when they are still idle. This may prevent the kernel from handing out leases on the file, which is something we don't want to block. Fix this by running a SRCU notifier call chain whenever on any lease attempt. nfsd can then purge the cache for that inode before returning. Since SRCU is only conditionally compiled in, we must only define the new chain if it's enabled, and users of the chain must ensure that SRCU is enabled. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2019-08-18 14:18:45 -04:00
filelock: don't do security checks on nfsd setlease calls Zdenek reported seeing some AVC denials due to nfsd trying to set delegations: type=AVC msg=audit(09.11.2023 09:03:46.411:496) : avc: denied { lease } for pid=5127 comm=rpc.nfsd capability=lease scontext=system_u:system_r:nfsd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:nfsd_t:s0 tclass=capability permissive=0 When setting delegations on behalf of nfsd, we don't want to do all of the normal capabilty and LSM checks. nfsd is a kernel thread and runs with CAP_LEASE set, so the uid checks end up being a no-op in most cases anyway. Some nfsd functions can end up running in normal process context when tearing down the server. At that point, the CAP_LEASE check can fail and cause the client to not tear down delegations when expected. Also, the way the per-fs ->setlease handlers work today is a little convoluted. The non-trivial ones are wrappers around generic_setlease, so when they fail due to permission problems they usually they end up doing a little extra work only to determine that they can't set the lease anyway. It would be more efficient to do those checks earlier. Transplant the permission checking from generic_setlease to vfs_setlease, which will make the permission checking happen earlier on filesystems that have a ->setlease operation. Add a new kernel_setlease function that bypasses these checks, and switch nfsd to use that instead of vfs_setlease. There is one behavioral change here: prior this patch the setlease_notifier would fire even if the lease attempt was going to fail the security checks later. With this change, it doesn't fire until the caller has passed them. I think this is a desirable change overall. nfsd is the only user of the setlease_notifier and it doesn't benefit from being notified about failed attempts. Cc: Ondrej Mosnáček <omosnacek@gmail.com> Reported-by: Zdenek Pytela <zpytela@redhat.com> Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248830 Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240205-bz2248830-v1-1-d0ec0daecba1@kernel.org Acked-by: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-02-05 07:09:31 -05:00
fs/locks.c: prepare for BKL removal This prepares the removal of the big kernel lock from the file locking code. We still use the BKL as long as fs/lockd uses it and ceph might sleep, but we can flip the definition to a private spinlock as soon as that's done. All users outside of fs/lockd get converted to use lock_flocks() instead of lock_kernel() where appropriate. Based on an earlier patch to use a spinlock from Matthew Wilcox, who has attempted this a few times before, the earliest patch from over 10 years ago turned it into a semaphore, which ended up being slower than the BKL and was subsequently reverted. Someone should do some serious performance testing when this becomes a spinlock, since this has caused problems before. Using a spinlock should be at least as good as the BKL in theory, but who knows... Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Cc: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
2010-09-18 15:09:31 +02:00
locks: clean up vfs_setlease kerneldoc comments Some of the latter paragraphs seem ambiguous and just plain wrong. In particular the break_lease comment makes no sense. We call break_lease (and break_deleg) from all sorts of vfs-layer functions, so there is clearly such a method. Also get rid of some of the other comments about what's needed for a full implementation. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 18:13:28 -04:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
fs/locks: remove unnecessary white space. - spaces before tabs, - spaces at the end of lines, - multiple blank lines, - blank lines before EXPORT_SYMBOL, can all go. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
locks: clean up vfs_setlease kerneldoc comments Some of the latter paragraphs seem ambiguous and just plain wrong. In particular the break_lease comment makes no sense. We call break_lease (and break_deleg) from all sorts of vfs-layer functions, so there is clearly such a method. Also get rid of some of the other comments about what's needed for a full implementation. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 18:13:28 -04:00
fs: locks: Fix some troubles at kernel-doc comments There are a few syntax violations that cause outputs of a few comments to not be properly parsed in ReST format. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:18 -04:00
locks: clean up vfs_setlease kerneldoc comments Some of the latter paragraphs seem ambiguous and just plain wrong. In particular the break_lease comment makes no sense. We call break_lease (and break_deleg) from all sorts of vfs-layer functions, so there is clearly such a method. Also get rid of some of the other comments about what's needed for a full implementation. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 18:13:28 -04:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: plumb a "priv" pointer into the setlease routines In later patches, we're going to add a new lock_manager_operation to finish setting up the lease while still holding the i_lock. To do this, we'll need to pass a little bit of info in the fcntl setlease case (primarily an fasync structure). Plumb the extra pointer into there in advance of that. We declare this pointer as a void ** to make it clear that this is private info, and that the caller isn't required to set this unless the lm_setup specifically requires it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:40:25 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: don't do security checks on nfsd setlease calls Zdenek reported seeing some AVC denials due to nfsd trying to set delegations: type=AVC msg=audit(09.11.2023 09:03:46.411:496) : avc: denied { lease } for pid=5127 comm=rpc.nfsd capability=lease scontext=system_u:system_r:nfsd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:nfsd_t:s0 tclass=capability permissive=0 When setting delegations on behalf of nfsd, we don't want to do all of the normal capabilty and LSM checks. nfsd is a kernel thread and runs with CAP_LEASE set, so the uid checks end up being a no-op in most cases anyway. Some nfsd functions can end up running in normal process context when tearing down the server. At that point, the CAP_LEASE check can fail and cause the client to not tear down delegations when expected. Also, the way the per-fs ->setlease handlers work today is a little convoluted. The non-trivial ones are wrappers around generic_setlease, so when they fail due to permission problems they usually they end up doing a little extra work only to determine that they can't set the lease anyway. It would be more efficient to do those checks earlier. Transplant the permission checking from generic_setlease to vfs_setlease, which will make the permission checking happen earlier on filesystems that have a ->setlease operation. Add a new kernel_setlease function that bypasses these checks, and switch nfsd to use that instead of vfs_setlease. There is one behavioral change here: prior this patch the setlease_notifier would fire even if the lease attempt was going to fail the security checks later. With this change, it doesn't fire until the caller has passed them. I think this is a desirable change overall. nfsd is the only user of the setlease_notifier and it doesn't benefit from being notified about failed attempts. Cc: Ondrej Mosnáček <omosnacek@gmail.com> Reported-by: Zdenek Pytela <zpytela@redhat.com> Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248830 Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240205-bz2248830-v1-1-d0ec0daecba1@kernel.org Acked-by: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-02-05 07:09:31 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: rename lease functions to reflect locks.c conventions We've been using the convention that vfs_foo is the function that calls a filesystem-specific foo method if it exists, or falls back on a generic method if it doesn't; thus vfs_foo is what is called when some other part of the kernel (normally lockd or nfsd) wants to get a lock, whereas foo is what filesystems call to use the underlying local functionality as part of their lock implementation. So rename setlease to vfs_setlease (which will call a filesystem-specific setlease after a later patch) and __setlease to setlease. Also, vfs_setlease need only be GPL-exported as long as it's only needed by lockd and nfsd. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-06-07 17:09:49 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs: Pass argument to fcntl_setlease as int The interface for fcntl expects the argument passed for the command F_SETLEASE to be of type int. The current code wrongly treats it as a long. In order to avoid access to undefined bits, we should explicitly cast the argument to int. Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Brodsky <Kevin.Brodsky@arm.com> Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com> Cc: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-morello@op-lists.linaro.org Signed-off-by: Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com> Message-Id: <20230414152459.816046-3-Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2023-02-01 15:05:33 +00:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
fasync: re-organize fasync entry insertion to allow it under a spinlock You currently cannot use "fasync_helper()" in an atomic environment to insert a new fasync entry, because it will need to allocate the new "struct fasync_struct". Yet fcntl_setlease() wants to call this under lock_flocks(), which is in the process of being converted from the BKL to a spinlock. In order to fix this, this abstracts out the actual fasync list insertion and the fasync allocations into functions of their own, and teaches fs/locks.c to pre-allocate the fasync_struct entry. That way the actual list insertion can happen while holding the required spinlock. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [bfields@redhat.com: rebase on top of my changes to Arnd's patch] Tested-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2010-10-27 12:38:12 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks/nfsd: allocate file lock outside of spinlock As suggested by Christoph Hellwig, this moves allocation of new file locks out of generic_setlease into the callers, nfs4_open_delegation and fcntl_setlease in order to allow GFP_KERNEL allocations when lock_flocks has become a spinlock. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2010-10-27 15:46:08 +02:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fasync: re-organize fasync entry insertion to allow it under a spinlock You currently cannot use "fasync_helper()" in an atomic environment to insert a new fasync entry, because it will need to allocate the new "struct fasync_struct". Yet fcntl_setlease() wants to call this under lock_flocks(), which is in the process of being converted from the BKL to a spinlock. In order to fix this, this abstracts out the actual fasync list insertion and the fasync allocations into functions of their own, and teaches fs/locks.c to pre-allocate the fasync_struct entry. That way the actual list insertion can happen while holding the required spinlock. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [bfields@redhat.com: rebase on top of my changes to Arnd's patch] Tested-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2010-10-27 12:38:12 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
fasync: re-organize fasync entry insertion to allow it under a spinlock You currently cannot use "fasync_helper()" in an atomic environment to insert a new fasync entry, because it will need to allocate the new "struct fasync_struct". Yet fcntl_setlease() wants to call this under lock_flocks(), which is in the process of being converted from the BKL to a spinlock. In order to fix this, this abstracts out the actual fasync list insertion and the fasync allocations into functions of their own, and teaches fs/locks.c to pre-allocate the fasync_struct entry. That way the actual list insertion can happen while holding the required spinlock. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [bfields@redhat.com: rebase on top of my changes to Arnd's patch] Tested-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2010-10-27 12:38:12 -04:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
fasync: re-organize fasync entry insertion to allow it under a spinlock You currently cannot use "fasync_helper()" in an atomic environment to insert a new fasync entry, because it will need to allocate the new "struct fasync_struct". Yet fcntl_setlease() wants to call this under lock_flocks(), which is in the process of being converted from the BKL to a spinlock. In order to fix this, this abstracts out the actual fasync list insertion and the fasync allocations into functions of their own, and teaches fs/locks.c to pre-allocate the fasync_struct entry. That way the actual list insertion can happen while holding the required spinlock. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [bfields@redhat.com: rebase on top of my changes to Arnd's patch] Tested-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2010-10-27 12:38:12 -04:00
locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases ...and move the fasync setup into it for fcntl lease calls. At the same time, change the semantics of how the file_lock double-pointer is handled. Up until now, on a successful lease return you got a pointer to the lock on the list. This is bad, since that pointer can no longer be relied on as valid once the inode->i_lock has been released. Change the code to instead just zero out the pointer if the lease we passed in ended up being used. Then the callers can just check to see if it's NULL after the call and free it if it isn't. The priv argument has the same semantics. The lm_setup function can zero the pointer out to signal to the caller that it should not be freed after the function returns. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-08-22 10:55:47 -04:00
locks: move locks_free_lock calls in do_fcntl_add_lease outside spinlock There's no need to call locks_free_lock here while still holding the i_lock. Defer that until the lock has been dropped. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 18:14:12 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
fasync: re-organize fasync entry insertion to allow it under a spinlock You currently cannot use "fasync_helper()" in an atomic environment to insert a new fasync entry, because it will need to allocate the new "struct fasync_struct". Yet fcntl_setlease() wants to call this under lock_flocks(), which is in the process of being converted from the BKL to a spinlock. In order to fix this, this abstracts out the actual fasync list insertion and the fasync allocations into functions of their own, and teaches fs/locks.c to pre-allocate the fasync_struct entry. That way the actual list insertion can happen while holding the required spinlock. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [bfields@redhat.com: rebase on top of my changes to Arnd's patch] Tested-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2010-10-27 12:38:12 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: prevent ENOMEM on lease unlock Removing a lock shouldn't require any allocations; a failure due to ENOMEM leaves the caller with a choice between retrying or giving up and leaking an unused lease. Next we should split the other lease calls into add and delete cases. I wanted to start with just the bugfix. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-10-30 17:31:13 -04:00
fs: Pass argument to fcntl_setlease as int The interface for fcntl expects the argument passed for the command F_SETLEASE to be of type int. The current code wrongly treats it as a long. In order to avoid access to undefined bits, we should explicitly cast the argument to int. Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org> Cc: Kevin Brodsky <Kevin.Brodsky@arm.com> Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com> Cc: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-morello@op-lists.linaro.org Signed-off-by: Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com> Message-Id: <20230414152459.816046-3-Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2023-02-01 15:05:33 +00:00
locks: prevent ENOMEM on lease unlock Removing a lock shouldn't require any allocations; a failure due to ENOMEM leaves the caller with a choice between retrying or giving up and leaking an unused lease. Next we should split the other lease calls into add and delete cases. I wanted to start with just the bugfix. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-10-30 17:31:13 -04:00
fs: track fl_owner for leases Just like for other lock types we should allow different owners to have a read lease on a file. Currently this can't happen, but with the addition of pNFS layout leases we'll need this feature. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-21 19:14:02 +01:00
locks: prevent ENOMEM on lease unlock Removing a lock shouldn't require any allocations; a failure due to ENOMEM leaves the caller with a choice between retrying or giving up and leaking an unused lease. Next we should split the other lease calls into add and delete cases. I wanted to start with just the bugfix. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-10-30 17:31:13 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: new helpers - flock_lock_inode_wait and posix_lock_inode_wait Allow callers to pass in an inode instead of a filp. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Tested-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2015-07-11 06:43:02 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: new helpers - flock_lock_inode_wait and posix_lock_inode_wait Allow callers to pass in an inode instead of a filp. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Tested-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2015-07-11 06:43:02 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: cleanup posix_lock_inode_wait and flock_lock_inode_wait All callers use locks_lock_inode_wait() instead. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-10-22 13:38:15 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: new helpers - flock_lock_inode_wait and posix_lock_inode_wait Allow callers to pass in an inode instead of a filp. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Tested-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2015-07-11 06:43:02 -04:00
locks: add special return value for asynchronous locks Use a special error value FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED to mean that a locking operation returned asynchronously. This is returned by posix_lock_file() for sleeping locks to mean that the lock has been queued on the block list, and will be woken up when it might become available and needs to be retried (either fl_lmops->fl_notify() is called or fl_wait is woken up). f_op->lock() to mean either the above, or that the filesystem will call back with fl_lmops->fl_grant() when the result of the locking operation is known. The filesystem can do this for sleeping as well as non-sleeping locks. This is to make sure, that return values of -EAGAIN and -EINPROGRESS by filesystems are not mistaken to mean an asynchronous locking. This also makes error handling in fs/locks.c and lockd/svclock.c slightly cleaner. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:57 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs/locks: always delete_block after waiting. Now that requests can block other requests, we need to be careful to always clean up those blocked requests. Any time that we wait for a request, we might have other requests attached, and when we stop waiting, we must clean them up. If the lock was granted, the requests might have been moved to the new lock, though when merged with a pre-exiting lock, this might not happen. In all cases we don't want blocked locks to remain attached, so we remove them to be safe. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Tested-by: syzbot+a4a3d526b4157113ec6a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: always delete_block after waiting. Now that requests can block other requests, we need to be careful to always clean up those blocked requests. Any time that we wait for a request, we might have other requests attached, and when we stop waiting, we must clean them up. If the lock was granted, the requests might have been moved to the new lock, though when merged with a pre-exiting lock, this might not happen. In all cases we don't want blocked locks to remain attached, so we remove them to be safe. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Tested-by: syzbot+a4a3d526b4157113ec6a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: introduce locks_lock_inode_wait() Users of the locks API commonly call either posix_lock_file_wait() or flock_lock_file_wait() depending upon the lock type. Add a new function locks_lock_inode_wait() which will check and call the correct function for the type of lock passed in. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-10-22 13:38:13 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: introduce locks_lock_inode_wait() Users of the locks API commonly call either posix_lock_file_wait() or flock_lock_file_wait() depending upon the lock type. Add a new function locks_lock_inode_wait() which will check and call the correct function for the type of lock passed in. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-10-22 13:38:13 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs: locks: Fix some troubles at kernel-doc comments There are a few syntax violations that cause outputs of a few comments to not be properly parsed in ReST format. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:18 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs: locks: Fix some troubles at kernel-doc comments There are a few syntax violations that cause outputs of a few comments to not be properly parsed in ReST format. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:18 -04:00
locks: remove LOCK_MAND flock lock support As best I can tell, the logic for these has been broken for a long time (at least before the move to git), such that they never conflict with anything. Also, nothing checks for these flags and prevented opens or read/write behavior on the files. They don't seem to do anything. Given that, we can rip these symbols out of the kernel, and just make flock(2) return 0 when LOCK_MAND is set in order to preserve existing behavior. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-09-10 15:36:29 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: remove LOCK_MAND flock lock support As best I can tell, the logic for these has been broken for a long time (at least before the move to git), such that they never conflict with anything. Also, nothing checks for these flags and prevented opens or read/write behavior on the files. They don't seem to do anything. Given that, we can rip these symbols out of the kernel, and just make flock(2) return 0 when LOCK_MAND is set in order to preserve existing behavior. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-09-10 15:36:29 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 16 Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
2009-01-14 14:14:18 +01:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/lock: Rearrange ops in flock syscall. The previous patch added flock_translate_cmd() in flock syscall. The test and the other one for LOCK_MAND do not depend on struct fd and are cheaper, so we can put them at the top and defer fdget() after that. Also, we can remove the unlock variable and use type instead. While at it, we fix this checkpatch error. CHECK: spaces preferred around that '|' (ctx:VxV) #45: FILE: fs/locks.c:2099: + if (type != F_UNLCK && !(f.file->f_mode & (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE))) ^ Finally, we can move the can_sleep part just before we use it. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:32 -07:00
fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock(). Two functions, flock syscall and locks_remove_flock(), call flock_make_lock(). It allocates struct file_lock from slab cache if its argument fl is NULL. When we call flock syscall, we pass NULL to allocate memory for struct file_lock. However, we always free it at the end by locks_free_lock(). We need not allocate it and instead should use a local variable as locks_remove_flock() does. Also, the validation for flock_translate_cmd() is not necessary for locks_remove_flock(). So we move the part to flock syscall and make flock_make_lock() return nothing. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:31 -07:00
fs/lock: Rearrange ops in flock syscall. The previous patch added flock_translate_cmd() in flock syscall. The test and the other one for LOCK_MAND do not depend on struct fd and are cheaper, so we can put them at the top and defer fdget() after that. Also, we can remove the unlock variable and use type instead. While at it, we fix this checkpatch error. CHECK: spaces preferred around that '|' (ctx:VxV) #45: FILE: fs/locks.c:2099: + if (type != F_UNLCK && !(f.file->f_mode & (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE))) ^ Finally, we can move the can_sleep part just before we use it. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:32 -07:00
locks: remove LOCK_MAND flock lock support As best I can tell, the logic for these has been broken for a long time (at least before the move to git), such that they never conflict with anything. Also, nothing checks for these flags and prevented opens or read/write behavior on the files. They don't seem to do anything. Given that, we can rip these symbols out of the kernel, and just make flock(2) return 0 when LOCK_MAND is set in order to preserve existing behavior. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-09-10 15:36:29 -04:00
Add process name and pid to locks warning It's fairly useless to complain about using an obsolete feature without telling the user which process used it. My Fedora desktop randomly drops this message, but I would really need this patch to figure out what triggers is. [ jlayton: print pid as well as process name ] Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-18 15:43:57 -08:00
fs/lock: Rearrange ops in flock syscall. The previous patch added flock_translate_cmd() in flock syscall. The test and the other one for LOCK_MAND do not depend on struct fd and are cheaper, so we can put them at the top and defer fdget() after that. Also, we can remove the unlock variable and use type instead. While at it, we fix this checkpatch error. CHECK: spaces preferred around that '|' (ctx:VxV) #45: FILE: fs/locks.c:2099: + if (type != F_UNLCK && !(f.file->f_mode & (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE))) ^ Finally, we can move the can_sleep part just before we use it. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:32 -07:00
locks: remove LOCK_MAND flock lock support As best I can tell, the logic for these has been broken for a long time (at least before the move to git), such that they never conflict with anything. Also, nothing checks for these flags and prevented opens or read/write behavior on the files. They don't seem to do anything. Given that, we can rip these symbols out of the kernel, and just make flock(2) return 0 when LOCK_MAND is set in order to preserve existing behavior. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-09-10 15:36:29 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/lock: Rearrange ops in flock syscall. The previous patch added flock_translate_cmd() in flock syscall. The test and the other one for LOCK_MAND do not depend on struct fd and are cheaper, so we can put them at the top and defer fdget() after that. Also, we can remove the unlock variable and use type instead. While at it, we fix this checkpatch error. CHECK: spaces preferred around that '|' (ctx:VxV) #45: FILE: fs/locks.c:2099: + if (type != F_UNLCK && !(f.file->f_mode & (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE))) ^ Finally, we can move the can_sleep part just before we use it. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:32 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: flock_make_lock should return a struct file_lock (or PTR_ERR) Eliminate the need for a return pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2014-09-04 10:25:06 -04:00
fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock(). Two functions, flock syscall and locks_remove_flock(), call flock_make_lock(). It allocates struct file_lock from slab cache if its argument fl is NULL. When we call flock syscall, we pass NULL to allocate memory for struct file_lock. However, we always free it at the end by locks_free_lock(). We need not allocate it and instead should use a local variable as locks_remove_flock() does. Also, the validation for flock_translate_cmd() is not necessary for locks_remove_flock(). So we move the part to flock syscall and make flock_make_lock() return nothing. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:31 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock(). Two functions, flock syscall and locks_remove_flock(), call flock_make_lock(). It allocates struct file_lock from slab cache if its argument fl is NULL. When we call flock syscall, we pass NULL to allocate memory for struct file_lock. However, we always free it at the end by locks_free_lock(). We need not allocate it and instead should use a local variable as locks_remove_flock() does. Also, the validation for flock_translate_cmd() is not necessary for locks_remove_flock(). So we move the part to flock syscall and make flock_make_lock() return nothing. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:31 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/lock: Rearrange ops in flock syscall. The previous patch added flock_translate_cmd() in flock syscall. The test and the other one for LOCK_MAND do not depend on struct fd and are cheaper, so we can put them at the top and defer fdget() after that. Also, we can remove the unlock variable and use type instead. While at it, we fix this checkpatch error. CHECK: spaces preferred around that '|' (ctx:VxV) #45: FILE: fs/locks.c:2099: + if (type != F_UNLCK && !(f.file->f_mode & (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE))) ^ Finally, we can move the can_sleep part just before we use it. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:32 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs/lock: Rearrange ops in flock syscall. The previous patch added flock_translate_cmd() in flock syscall. The test and the other one for LOCK_MAND do not depend on struct fd and are cheaper, so we can put them at the top and defer fdget() after that. Also, we can remove the unlock variable and use type instead. While at it, we fix this checkpatch error. CHECK: spaces preferred around that '|' (ctx:VxV) #45: FILE: fs/locks.c:2099: + if (type != F_UNLCK && !(f.file->f_mode & (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE))) ^ Finally, we can move the can_sleep part just before we use it. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:32 -07:00
Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs" This partially reverts commit c568d68341be7030f5647def68851e469b21ca11. Overlayfs files will now automatically get the correct locks, no need to hack overlay support in VFS. It is a partial revert, because it leaves the locks_inode() calls in place and defines locks_inode() to file_inode(). We could revert those as well, but it would be unnecessary code churn and it makes sense to document that we are getting the inode for locking purposes. Don't revert MS_NOREMOTELOCK yet since that has been part of the userspace API for some time (though not in a useful way). Will try to remove internal flags later when the dust around the new mount API settles. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-07-18 15:44:43 +02:00
switch simple cases of fget_light to fdget Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-08-28 12:52:22 -04:00
fs/lock: Rearrange ops in flock syscall. The previous patch added flock_translate_cmd() in flock syscall. The test and the other one for LOCK_MAND do not depend on struct fd and are cheaper, so we can put them at the top and defer fdget() after that. Also, we can remove the unlock variable and use type instead. While at it, we fix this checkpatch error. CHECK: spaces preferred around that '|' (ctx:VxV) #45: FILE: fs/locks.c:2099: + if (type != F_UNLCK && !(f.file->f_mode & (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE))) ^ Finally, we can move the can_sleep part just before we use it. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:32 -07:00
fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock(). Two functions, flock syscall and locks_remove_flock(), call flock_make_lock(). It allocates struct file_lock from slab cache if its argument fl is NULL. When we call flock syscall, we pass NULL to allocate memory for struct file_lock. However, we always free it at the end by locks_free_lock(). We need not allocate it and instead should use a local variable as locks_remove_flock() does. Also, the validation for flock_translate_cmd() is not necessary for locks_remove_flock(). So we move the part to flock syscall and make flock_make_lock() return nothing. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:31 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock(). Two functions, flock syscall and locks_remove_flock(), call flock_make_lock(). It allocates struct file_lock from slab cache if its argument fl is NULL. When we call flock syscall, we pass NULL to allocate memory for struct file_lock. However, we always free it at the end by locks_free_lock(). We need not allocate it and instead should use a local variable as locks_remove_flock() does. Also, the validation for flock_translate_cmd() is not necessary for locks_remove_flock(). So we move the part to flock syscall and make flock_make_lock() return nothing. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:31 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: Fix dropped call to ->fl_release_private() Prior to commit 4149be7bda7e, sys_flock() would allocate the file_lock struct it was going to use to pass parameters, call ->flock() and then call locks_free_lock() to get rid of it - which had the side effect of calling locks_release_private() and thus ->fl_release_private(). With commit 4149be7bda7e, however, this is no longer the case: the struct is now allocated on the stack, and locks_free_lock() is no longer called - and thus any remaining private data doesn't get cleaned up either. This causes afs flock to cause oops. Kasan catches this as a UAF by the list_del_init() in afs_fl_release_private() for the file_lock record produced by afs_fl_copy_lock() as the original record didn't get delisted. It can be reproduced using the generic/504 xfstest. Fix this by reinstating the locks_release_private() call in sys_flock(). I'm not sure if this would affect any other filesystems. If not, then the release could be done in afs_flock() instead. Changes ======= ver #2) - Don't need to call ->fl_release_private() after calling the security hook, only after calling ->flock(). Fixes: 4149be7bda7e ("fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock().") cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166075758809.3532462.13307935588777587536.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Acked-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-08-17 19:41:27 +01:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
switch simple cases of fget_light to fdget Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-08-28 12:52:22 -04:00
fs/lock: Rearrange ops in flock syscall. The previous patch added flock_translate_cmd() in flock syscall. The test and the other one for LOCK_MAND do not depend on struct fd and are cheaper, so we can put them at the top and defer fdget() after that. Also, we can remove the unlock variable and use type instead. While at it, we fix this checkpatch error. CHECK: spaces preferred around that '|' (ctx:VxV) #45: FILE: fs/locks.c:2099: + if (type != F_UNLCK && !(f.file->f_mode & (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE))) ^ Finally, we can move the can_sleep part just before we use it. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:32 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from test_lock Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd) too; currently they only call the generic methods. This patch does that for test_lock. Note that this hasn't been necessary until recently, because the few filesystems that define ->lock() (nfs, cifs...) aren't exportable via NFS. However GFS (and, in the future, other cluster filesystems) need to implement their own locking to get cluster-coherent locking, and also want to be able to export locking to NFS (lockd and NFSv4). So we accomplish this by factoring out code such as this and exporting it for the use of lockd and nfsd. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-21 00:58:50 -05:00
locks: fix vfs_test_lock() comment Thanks to Doug Chapman for pointing out that the comment here is inconsistent with the function prototype. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-05-11 16:22:50 -04:00
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from test_lock Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd) too; currently they only call the generic methods. This patch does that for test_lock. Note that this hasn't been necessary until recently, because the few filesystems that define ->lock() (nfs, cifs...) aren't exportable via NFS. However GFS (and, in the future, other cluster filesystems) need to implement their own locking to get cluster-coherent locking, and also want to be able to export locking to NFS (lockd and NFSv4). So we accomplish this by factoring out code such as this and exporting it for the use of lockd and nfsd. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-21 00:58:50 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs" This partially reverts commit c568d68341be7030f5647def68851e469b21ca11. Overlayfs files will now automatically get the correct locks, no need to hack overlay support in VFS. It is a partial revert, because it leaves the locks_inode() calls in place and defines locks_inode() to file_inode(). We could revert those as well, but it would be unnecessary code churn and it makes sense to document that we are getting the inode for locking purposes. Don't revert MS_NOREMOTELOCK yet since that has been part of the userspace API for some time (though not in a useful way). Will try to remove internal flags later when the dust around the new mount API settles. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-07-18 15:44:43 +02:00
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from test_lock Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd) too; currently they only call the generic methods. This patch does that for test_lock. Note that this hasn't been necessary until recently, because the few filesystems that define ->lock() (nfs, cifs...) aren't exportable via NFS. However GFS (and, in the future, other cluster filesystems) need to implement their own locking to get cluster-coherent locking, and also want to be able to export locking to NFS (lockd and NFSv4). So we accomplish this by factoring out code such as this and exporting it for the use of lockd and nfsd. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-21 00:58:50 -05:00
fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks Since commit c69899a17ca4 "NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update", NFSv4 has been inserting locks in rpciod worker context. The result is that the file_lock's fl_nspid is the kworker's pid instead of the original userspace pid. The fl_nspid is only used to represent the namespaced virtual pid number when displaying locks or returning from F_GETLK. There's no reason to set it for every inserted lock, since we can usually just look it up from fl_pid. So, instead of looking up and holding struct pid for every lock, let's just look up the virtual pid number from fl_pid when it is needed. That means we can remove fl_nspid entirely. The translaton and presentation of fl_pid should handle the following four cases: 1 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a remote lock: In this case, the filesystem should determine the l_pid to return here. Filesystems should indicate that the fl_pid represents a non-local pid value that should not be translated by returning an fl_pid <= 0. 2 - F_GETLK on a local file with a remote lock: This should be the l_pid of the lock manager process, and translated. 3 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a local lock, and 4 - F_GETLK on a local file with a local lock: These should be the translated l_pid of the local locking process. Fuse was already doing the correct thing by translating the pid into the caller's namespace. With this change we must update fuse to translate to init's pid namespace, so that the locks API can then translate from init's pid namespace into the pid namespace of the caller. With this change, the locks API will expect that if a filesystem returns a remote pid as opposed to a local pid for F_GETLK, that remote pid will be <= 0. This signifies that the pid is remote, and the locks API will forego translating that pid into the pid namespace of the local calling process. Finally, we convert remote filesystems to present remote pids using negative numbers. Have lustre, 9p, ceph, cifs, and dlm negate the remote pid returned for F_GETLK lock requests. Since local pids will never be larger than PID_MAX_LIMIT (which is currently defined as <= 4 million), but pid_t is an unsigned int, we should have plenty of room to represent remote pids with negative numbers if we assume that remote pid numbers are similarly limited. If this is not the case, then we run the risk of having a remote pid returned for which there is also a corresponding local pid. This is a problem we have now, but this patch should reduce the chances of that occurring, while also returning those remote pid numbers, for whatever that may be worth. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:22 -04:00
fs/locks: Fix typo Signed-off-by: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2023-07-21 11:21:47 +02:00
fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks Since commit c69899a17ca4 "NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update", NFSv4 has been inserting locks in rpciod worker context. The result is that the file_lock's fl_nspid is the kworker's pid instead of the original userspace pid. The fl_nspid is only used to represent the namespaced virtual pid number when displaying locks or returning from F_GETLK. There's no reason to set it for every inserted lock, since we can usually just look it up from fl_pid. So, instead of looking up and holding struct pid for every lock, let's just look up the virtual pid number from fl_pid when it is needed. That means we can remove fl_nspid entirely. The translaton and presentation of fl_pid should handle the following four cases: 1 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a remote lock: In this case, the filesystem should determine the l_pid to return here. Filesystems should indicate that the fl_pid represents a non-local pid value that should not be translated by returning an fl_pid <= 0. 2 - F_GETLK on a local file with a remote lock: This should be the l_pid of the lock manager process, and translated. 3 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a local lock, and 4 - F_GETLK on a local file with a local lock: These should be the translated l_pid of the local locking process. Fuse was already doing the correct thing by translating the pid into the caller's namespace. With this change we must update fuse to translate to init's pid namespace, so that the locks API can then translate from init's pid namespace into the pid namespace of the caller. With this change, the locks API will expect that if a filesystem returns a remote pid as opposed to a local pid for F_GETLK, that remote pid will be <= 0. This signifies that the pid is remote, and the locks API will forego translating that pid into the pid namespace of the local calling process. Finally, we convert remote filesystems to present remote pids using negative numbers. Have lustre, 9p, ceph, cifs, and dlm negate the remote pid returned for F_GETLK lock requests. Since local pids will never be larger than PID_MAX_LIMIT (which is currently defined as <= 4 million), but pid_t is an unsigned int, we should have plenty of room to represent remote pids with negative numbers if we assume that remote pid numbers are similarly limited. If this is not the case, then we run the risk of having a remote pid returned for which there is also a corresponding local pid. This is a problem we have now, but this patch should reduce the chances of that occurring, while also returning those remote pid numbers, for whatever that may be worth. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:22 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_translate_pid to take file_lock_core locks_translate_pid is used on both locks and leases, so have that take struct file_lock_core. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-32-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:13 -05:00
fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks Since commit c69899a17ca4 "NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update", NFSv4 has been inserting locks in rpciod worker context. The result is that the file_lock's fl_nspid is the kworker's pid instead of the original userspace pid. The fl_nspid is only used to represent the namespaced virtual pid number when displaying locks or returning from F_GETLK. There's no reason to set it for every inserted lock, since we can usually just look it up from fl_pid. So, instead of looking up and holding struct pid for every lock, let's just look up the virtual pid number from fl_pid when it is needed. That means we can remove fl_nspid entirely. The translaton and presentation of fl_pid should handle the following four cases: 1 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a remote lock: In this case, the filesystem should determine the l_pid to return here. Filesystems should indicate that the fl_pid represents a non-local pid value that should not be translated by returning an fl_pid <= 0. 2 - F_GETLK on a local file with a remote lock: This should be the l_pid of the lock manager process, and translated. 3 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a local lock, and 4 - F_GETLK on a local file with a local lock: These should be the translated l_pid of the local locking process. Fuse was already doing the correct thing by translating the pid into the caller's namespace. With this change we must update fuse to translate to init's pid namespace, so that the locks API can then translate from init's pid namespace into the pid namespace of the caller. With this change, the locks API will expect that if a filesystem returns a remote pid as opposed to a local pid for F_GETLK, that remote pid will be <= 0. This signifies that the pid is remote, and the locks API will forego translating that pid into the pid namespace of the local calling process. Finally, we convert remote filesystems to present remote pids using negative numbers. Have lustre, 9p, ceph, cifs, and dlm negate the remote pid returned for F_GETLK lock requests. Since local pids will never be larger than PID_MAX_LIMIT (which is currently defined as <= 4 million), but pid_t is an unsigned int, we should have plenty of room to represent remote pids with negative numbers if we assume that remote pid numbers are similarly limited. If this is not the case, then we run the risk of having a remote pid returned for which there is also a corresponding local pid. This is a problem we have now, but this patch should reduce the chances of that occurring, while also returning those remote pid numbers, for whatever that may be worth. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:22 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_translate_pid to take file_lock_core locks_translate_pid is used on both locks and leases, so have that take struct file_lock_core. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-32-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:13 -05:00
fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks Since commit c69899a17ca4 "NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update", NFSv4 has been inserting locks in rpciod worker context. The result is that the file_lock's fl_nspid is the kworker's pid instead of the original userspace pid. The fl_nspid is only used to represent the namespaced virtual pid number when displaying locks or returning from F_GETLK. There's no reason to set it for every inserted lock, since we can usually just look it up from fl_pid. So, instead of looking up and holding struct pid for every lock, let's just look up the virtual pid number from fl_pid when it is needed. That means we can remove fl_nspid entirely. The translaton and presentation of fl_pid should handle the following four cases: 1 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a remote lock: In this case, the filesystem should determine the l_pid to return here. Filesystems should indicate that the fl_pid represents a non-local pid value that should not be translated by returning an fl_pid <= 0. 2 - F_GETLK on a local file with a remote lock: This should be the l_pid of the lock manager process, and translated. 3 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a local lock, and 4 - F_GETLK on a local file with a local lock: These should be the translated l_pid of the local locking process. Fuse was already doing the correct thing by translating the pid into the caller's namespace. With this change we must update fuse to translate to init's pid namespace, so that the locks API can then translate from init's pid namespace into the pid namespace of the caller. With this change, the locks API will expect that if a filesystem returns a remote pid as opposed to a local pid for F_GETLK, that remote pid will be <= 0. This signifies that the pid is remote, and the locks API will forego translating that pid into the pid namespace of the local calling process. Finally, we convert remote filesystems to present remote pids using negative numbers. Have lustre, 9p, ceph, cifs, and dlm negate the remote pid returned for F_GETLK lock requests. Since local pids will never be larger than PID_MAX_LIMIT (which is currently defined as <= 4 million), but pid_t is an unsigned int, we should have plenty of room to represent remote pids with negative numbers if we assume that remote pid numbers are similarly limited. If this is not the case, then we run the risk of having a remote pid returned for which there is also a corresponding local pid. This is a problem we have now, but this patch should reduce the chances of that occurring, while also returning those remote pid numbers, for whatever that may be worth. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:22 -04:00
filelock: drop the IS_* macros These don't add a lot of value over just open-coding the flag check. Suggested-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-16-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:57 -05:00
filelock: convert locks_translate_pid to take file_lock_core locks_translate_pid is used on both locks and leases, so have that take struct file_lock_core. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-32-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:13 -05:00
filelock: drop the IS_* macros These don't add a lot of value over just open-coding the flag check. Suggested-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-16-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:57 -05:00
fs/lock: skip lock owner pid translation in case we are in init_pid_ns If the flock owner process is dead and its pid has been already freed, pid translation won't work, but we still want to show flock owner pid number when expecting /proc/$PID/fdinfo/$FD in init pidns. Reproducer: process A process A1 process A2 fork()---------> exit() open() flock() fork()---------> exit() sleep() Before the patch: ================ (root@vz7)/: cat /proc/${PID_A2}/fdinfo/3 pos: 4 flags: 02100002 mnt_id: 257 lock: (root@vz7)/: After the patch: =============== (root@vz7)/:cat /proc/${PID_A2}/fdinfo/3 pos: 4 flags: 02100002 mnt_id: 295 lock: 1: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE ${PID_A1} b6:f8a61:529946 0 EOF Fixes: 9d5b86ac13c5 ("fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks") Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2018-06-08 17:27:11 +03:00
filelock: convert locks_translate_pid to take file_lock_core locks_translate_pid is used on both locks and leases, so have that take struct file_lock_core. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-32-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:13 -05:00
fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks Since commit c69899a17ca4 "NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update", NFSv4 has been inserting locks in rpciod worker context. The result is that the file_lock's fl_nspid is the kworker's pid instead of the original userspace pid. The fl_nspid is only used to represent the namespaced virtual pid number when displaying locks or returning from F_GETLK. There's no reason to set it for every inserted lock, since we can usually just look it up from fl_pid. So, instead of looking up and holding struct pid for every lock, let's just look up the virtual pid number from fl_pid when it is needed. That means we can remove fl_nspid entirely. The translaton and presentation of fl_pid should handle the following four cases: 1 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a remote lock: In this case, the filesystem should determine the l_pid to return here. Filesystems should indicate that the fl_pid represents a non-local pid value that should not be translated by returning an fl_pid <= 0. 2 - F_GETLK on a local file with a remote lock: This should be the l_pid of the lock manager process, and translated. 3 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a local lock, and 4 - F_GETLK on a local file with a local lock: These should be the translated l_pid of the local locking process. Fuse was already doing the correct thing by translating the pid into the caller's namespace. With this change we must update fuse to translate to init's pid namespace, so that the locks API can then translate from init's pid namespace into the pid namespace of the caller. With this change, the locks API will expect that if a filesystem returns a remote pid as opposed to a local pid for F_GETLK, that remote pid will be <= 0. This signifies that the pid is remote, and the locks API will forego translating that pid into the pid namespace of the local calling process. Finally, we convert remote filesystems to present remote pids using negative numbers. Have lustre, 9p, ceph, cifs, and dlm negate the remote pid returned for F_GETLK lock requests. Since local pids will never be larger than PID_MAX_LIMIT (which is currently defined as <= 4 million), but pid_t is an unsigned int, we should have plenty of room to represent remote pids with negative numbers if we assume that remote pid numbers are similarly limited. If this is not the case, then we run the risk of having a remote pid returned for which there is also a corresponding local pid. This is a problem we have now, but this patch should reduce the chances of that occurring, while also returning those remote pid numbers, for whatever that may be worth. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:22 -04:00
filelock: convert locks_translate_pid to take file_lock_core locks_translate_pid is used on both locks and leases, so have that take struct file_lock_core. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-32-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:13 -05:00
fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks Since commit c69899a17ca4 "NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update", NFSv4 has been inserting locks in rpciod worker context. The result is that the file_lock's fl_nspid is the kworker's pid instead of the original userspace pid. The fl_nspid is only used to represent the namespaced virtual pid number when displaying locks or returning from F_GETLK. There's no reason to set it for every inserted lock, since we can usually just look it up from fl_pid. So, instead of looking up and holding struct pid for every lock, let's just look up the virtual pid number from fl_pid when it is needed. That means we can remove fl_nspid entirely. The translaton and presentation of fl_pid should handle the following four cases: 1 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a remote lock: In this case, the filesystem should determine the l_pid to return here. Filesystems should indicate that the fl_pid represents a non-local pid value that should not be translated by returning an fl_pid <= 0. 2 - F_GETLK on a local file with a remote lock: This should be the l_pid of the lock manager process, and translated. 3 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a local lock, and 4 - F_GETLK on a local file with a local lock: These should be the translated l_pid of the local locking process. Fuse was already doing the correct thing by translating the pid into the caller's namespace. With this change we must update fuse to translate to init's pid namespace, so that the locks API can then translate from init's pid namespace into the pid namespace of the caller. With this change, the locks API will expect that if a filesystem returns a remote pid as opposed to a local pid for F_GETLK, that remote pid will be <= 0. This signifies that the pid is remote, and the locks API will forego translating that pid into the pid namespace of the local calling process. Finally, we convert remote filesystems to present remote pids using negative numbers. Have lustre, 9p, ceph, cifs, and dlm negate the remote pid returned for F_GETLK lock requests. Since local pids will never be larger than PID_MAX_LIMIT (which is currently defined as <= 4 million), but pid_t is an unsigned int, we should have plenty of room to represent remote pids with negative numbers if we assume that remote pid numbers are similarly limited. If this is not the case, then we run the risk of having a remote pid returned for which there is also a corresponding local pid. This is a problem we have now, but this patch should reduce the chances of that occurring, while also returning those remote pid numbers, for whatever that may be worth. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:22 -04:00
locks: create posix-to-flock helper functions Factor out a bit of messy code by creating posix-to-flock counterparts to the existing flock-to-posix helper functions. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-20 16:10:11 -05:00
filelock: convert locks_translate_pid to take file_lock_core locks_translate_pid is used on both locks and leases, so have that take struct file_lock_core. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-32-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:13 -05:00
locks: create posix-to-flock helper functions Factor out a bit of messy code by creating posix-to-flock counterparts to the existing flock-to-posix helper functions. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-20 16:10:11 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: create posix-to-flock helper functions Factor out a bit of messy code by creating posix-to-flock counterparts to the existing flock-to-posix helper functions. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-20 16:10:11 -05:00
filelock: convert locks_translate_pid to take file_lock_core locks_translate_pid is used on both locks and leases, so have that take struct file_lock_core. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-32-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:13 -05:00
locks: create posix-to-flock helper functions Factor out a bit of messy code by creating posix-to-flock counterparts to the existing flock-to-posix helper functions. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-20 16:10:11 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: create posix-to-flock helper functions Factor out a bit of messy code by creating posix-to-flock counterparts to the existing flock-to-posix helper functions. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-20 16:10:11 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: F_UNLCK extension for F_OFD_GETLK Currently F_UNLCK with F_OFD_GETLK returns -EINVAL. This patch changes it such that specifying F_UNLCK returns information only about OFD locks that are owned by the given file description. Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2023-06-22 21:52:23 +05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: rename file-private locks to "open file description locks" File-private locks have been merged into Linux for v3.15, and *now* people are commenting that the name and macro definitions for the new file-private locks suck. ...and I can't even disagree. The names and command macros do suck. We're going to have to live with these for a long time, so it's important that we be happy with the names before we're stuck with them. The consensus on the lists so far is that they should be rechristened as "open file description locks". The name isn't a big deal for the kernel, but the command macros are not visually distinct enough from the traditional POSIX lock macros. The glibc and documentation folks are recommending that we change them to look like F_OFD_{GETLK|SETLK|SETLKW}. That lessens the chance that a programmer will typo one of the commands wrong, and also makes it easier to spot this difference when reading code. This patch makes the following changes that I think are necessary before v3.15 ships: 1) rename the command macros to their new names. These end up in the uapi headers and so are part of the external-facing API. It turns out that glibc doesn't actually use the fcntl.h uapi header, but it's hard to be sure that something else won't. Changing it now is safest. 2) make the the /proc/locks output display these as type "OFDLCK" Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@mindspring.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-22 08:23:58 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from test_lock Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd) too; currently they only call the generic methods. This patch does that for test_lock. Note that this hasn't been necessary until recently, because the few filesystems that define ->lock() (nfs, cifs...) aren't exportable via NFS. However GFS (and, in the future, other cluster filesystems) need to implement their own locking to get cluster-coherent locking, and also want to be able to export locking to NFS (lockd and NFSv4). So we accomplish this by factoring out code such as this and exporting it for the use of lockd and nfsd. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-21 00:58:50 -05:00
fs/locks: remove unnecessary white space. - spaces before tabs, - spaces at the end of lines, - multiple blank lines, - blank lines before EXPORT_SYMBOL, can all go. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
locks: create posix-to-flock helper functions Factor out a bit of messy code by creating posix-to-flock counterparts to the existing flock-to-posix helper functions. Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-20 16:10:11 -05:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from setlock code Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd) too; currently they only call the generic methods. This patch does that for all the setlk code. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 15:08:55 -05:00
locks: allow {vfs,posix}_lock_file to return conflicting lock The nfsv4 protocol's lock operation, in the case of a conflict, returns information about the conflicting lock. It's unclear how clients can use this, so for now we're not going so far as to add a filesystem method that can return a conflicting lock, but we may as well return something in the local case when it's easy to. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 16:15:35 -05:00
locks: add fl_grant callback for asynchronous lock return Acquiring a lock on a cluster filesystem may require communication with remote hosts, and to avoid blocking lockd or nfsd threads during such communication, we allow the results to be returned asynchronously. When a ->lock() call needs to block, the file system will return -EINPROGRESS, and then later return the results with a call to the routine in the fl_grant field of the lock_manager_operations struct. This differs from the case when ->lock returns -EAGAIN to a blocking lock request; in that case, the filesystem calls fl_notify when the lock is granted, and the caller retries the original lock. So while fl_notify is merely a hint to the caller that it should retry, fl_grant actually communicates the final result of the lock operation (with the lock already acquired in the succesful case). Therefore fl_grant takes a lock, a status and, for the test lock case, a conflicting lock. We also allow fl_grant to return an error to the filesystem, to handle the case where the fl_grant requests arrives after the lock manager has already given up waiting for it. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2006-12-05 23:31:28 -05:00
lockd: add doc to enable EXPORT_OP_ASYNC_LOCK This patch adds a note to enable EXPORT_OP_ASYNC_LOCK for asynchronous lock request handling. Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
2023-09-12 17:53:21 -04:00
locks: add fl_grant callback for asynchronous lock return Acquiring a lock on a cluster filesystem may require communication with remote hosts, and to avoid blocking lockd or nfsd threads during such communication, we allow the results to be returned asynchronously. When a ->lock() call needs to block, the file system will return -EINPROGRESS, and then later return the results with a call to the routine in the fl_grant field of the lock_manager_operations struct. This differs from the case when ->lock returns -EAGAIN to a blocking lock request; in that case, the filesystem calls fl_notify when the lock is granted, and the caller retries the original lock. So while fl_notify is merely a hint to the caller that it should retry, fl_grant actually communicates the final result of the lock operation (with the lock already acquired in the succesful case). Therefore fl_grant takes a lock, a status and, for the test lock case, a conflicting lock. We also allow fl_grant to return an error to the filesystem, to handle the case where the fl_grant requests arrives after the lock manager has already given up waiting for it. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2006-12-05 23:31:28 -05:00
locks: add special return value for asynchronous locks Use a special error value FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED to mean that a locking operation returned asynchronously. This is returned by posix_lock_file() for sleeping locks to mean that the lock has been queued on the block list, and will be woken up when it might become available and needs to be retried (either fl_lmops->fl_notify() is called or fl_wait is woken up). f_op->lock() to mean either the above, or that the filesystem will call back with fl_lmops->fl_grant() when the result of the locking operation is known. The filesystem can do this for sleeping as well as non-sleeping locks. This is to make sure, that return values of -EAGAIN and -EINPROGRESS by filesystems are not mistaken to mean an asynchronous locking. This also makes error handling in fs/locks.c and lockd/svclock.c slightly cleaner. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:57 -07:00
locks: add fl_grant callback for asynchronous lock return Acquiring a lock on a cluster filesystem may require communication with remote hosts, and to avoid blocking lockd or nfsd threads during such communication, we allow the results to be returned asynchronously. When a ->lock() call needs to block, the file system will return -EINPROGRESS, and then later return the results with a call to the routine in the fl_grant field of the lock_manager_operations struct. This differs from the case when ->lock returns -EAGAIN to a blocking lock request; in that case, the filesystem calls fl_notify when the lock is granted, and the caller retries the original lock. So while fl_notify is merely a hint to the caller that it should retry, fl_grant actually communicates the final result of the lock operation (with the lock already acquired in the succesful case). Therefore fl_grant takes a lock, a status and, for the test lock case, a conflicting lock. We also allow fl_grant to return an error to the filesystem, to handle the case where the fl_grant requests arrives after the lock manager has already given up waiting for it. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2006-12-05 23:31:28 -05:00
locks: rename lock-manager ops Both the filesystem and the lock manager can associate operations with a lock. Confusingly, one of them (fl_release_private) actually has the same name in both operation structures. It would save some confusion to give the lock-manager ops different names. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-20 20:21:59 -04:00
locks: add fl_grant callback for asynchronous lock return Acquiring a lock on a cluster filesystem may require communication with remote hosts, and to avoid blocking lockd or nfsd threads during such communication, we allow the results to be returned asynchronously. When a ->lock() call needs to block, the file system will return -EINPROGRESS, and then later return the results with a call to the routine in the fl_grant field of the lock_manager_operations struct. This differs from the case when ->lock returns -EAGAIN to a blocking lock request; in that case, the filesystem calls fl_notify when the lock is granted, and the caller retries the original lock. So while fl_notify is merely a hint to the caller that it should retry, fl_grant actually communicates the final result of the lock operation (with the lock already acquired in the succesful case). Therefore fl_grant takes a lock, a status and, for the test lock case, a conflicting lock. We also allow fl_grant to return an error to the filesystem, to handle the case where the fl_grant requests arrives after the lock manager has already given up waiting for it. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2006-12-05 23:31:28 -05:00
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from setlock code Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd) too; currently they only call the generic methods. This patch does that for all the setlk code. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 15:08:55 -05:00
locks: allow {vfs,posix}_lock_file to return conflicting lock The nfsv4 protocol's lock operation, in the case of a conflict, returns information about the conflicting lock. It's unclear how clients can use this, so for now we're not going so far as to add a filesystem method that can return a conflicting lock, but we may as well return something in the local case when it's easy to. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 16:15:35 -05:00
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from setlock code Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd) too; currently they only call the generic methods. This patch does that for all the setlk code. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 15:08:55 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs" This partially reverts commit c568d68341be7030f5647def68851e469b21ca11. Overlayfs files will now automatically get the correct locks, no need to hack overlay support in VFS. It is a partial revert, because it leaves the locks_inode() calls in place and defines locks_inode() to file_inode(). We could revert those as well, but it would be unnecessary code churn and it makes sense to document that we are getting the inode for locking purposes. Don't revert MS_NOREMOTELOCK yet since that has been part of the userspace API for some time (though not in a useful way). Will try to remove internal flags later when the dust around the new mount API settles. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-07-18 15:44:43 +02:00
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from setlock code Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd) too; currently they only call the generic methods. This patch does that for all the setlk code. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 15:08:55 -05:00
locks: allow {vfs,posix}_lock_file to return conflicting lock The nfsv4 protocol's lock operation, in the case of a conflict, returns information about the conflicting lock. It's unclear how clients can use this, so for now we're not going so far as to add a filesystem method that can return a conflicting lock, but we may as well return something in the local case when it's easy to. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 16:15:35 -05:00
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from setlock code Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd) too; currently they only call the generic methods. This patch does that for all the setlk code. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 15:08:55 -05:00
locks: cleanup code duplication Extract common code into a function. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:57 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: cleanup code duplication Extract common code into a function. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:57 -07:00
locks: allow ->lock() to return FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED Allow filesystem's ->lock() method to call posix_lock_file() instead of posix_lock_file_wait(), and return FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED. This makes it possible to implement a such a ->lock() function, that works with the lock manager, which needs the call to be asynchronous. Now the vfs_lock_file() helper can be used, so this is a cleanup as well. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:58 -07:00
locks: cleanup code duplication Extract common code into a function. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:57 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs/locks: always delete_block after waiting. Now that requests can block other requests, we need to be careful to always clean up those blocked requests. Any time that we wait for a request, we might have other requests attached, and when we stop waiting, we must clean them up. If the lock was granted, the requests might have been moved to the new lock, though when merged with a pre-exiting lock, this might not happen. In all cases we don't want blocked locks to remain attached, so we remove them to be safe. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Tested-by: syzbot+a4a3d526b4157113ec6a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
locks: cleanup code duplication Extract common code into a function. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:57 -07:00
fs/locks: always delete_block after waiting. Now that requests can block other requests, we need to be careful to always clean up those blocked requests. Any time that we wait for a request, we might have other requests attached, and when we stop waiting, we must clean them up. If the lock was granted, the requests might have been moved to the new lock, though when merged with a pre-exiting lock, this might not happen. In all cases we don't want blocked locks to remain attached, so we remove them to be safe. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Tested-by: syzbot+a4a3d526b4157113ec6a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
locks: cleanup code duplication Extract common code into a function. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:57 -07:00
locks: Use more file_inode and fix a comment Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-10-15 09:07:07 -04:00
locks: only validate the lock vs. f_mode in F_SETLK codepaths v2: replace missing break in switch statement (as pointed out by Dave Jones) commit bce7560d4946 (locks: consolidate checks for compatible filp->f_mode values in setlk handlers) introduced a regression in the F_GETLK handler. flock64_to_posix_lock is a shared codepath between F_GETLK and F_SETLK, but the f_mode checks should only be applicable to the F_SETLK codepaths according to POSIX. Instead of just reverting the patch, add a new function to do this checking and have the F_SETLK handlers call it. Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-and-Tested-by: Reuben Farrelly <reuben@reub.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 11:41:54 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: only validate the lock vs. f_mode in F_SETLK codepaths v2: replace missing break in switch statement (as pointed out by Dave Jones) commit bce7560d4946 (locks: consolidate checks for compatible filp->f_mode values in setlk handlers) introduced a regression in the F_GETLK handler. flock64_to_posix_lock is a shared codepath between F_GETLK and F_SETLK, but the f_mode checks should only be applicable to the F_SETLK codepaths according to POSIX. Instead of just reverting the patch, add a new function to do this checking and have the F_SETLK handlers call it. Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-and-Tested-by: Reuben Farrelly <reuben@reub.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 11:41:54 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: only validate the lock vs. f_mode in F_SETLK codepaths v2: replace missing break in switch statement (as pointed out by Dave Jones) commit bce7560d4946 (locks: consolidate checks for compatible filp->f_mode values in setlk handlers) introduced a regression in the F_GETLK handler. flock64_to_posix_lock is a shared codepath between F_GETLK and F_SETLK, but the f_mode checks should only be applicable to the F_SETLK codepaths according to POSIX. Instead of just reverting the patch, add a new function to do this checking and have the F_SETLK handlers call it. Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-and-Tested-by: Reuben Farrelly <reuben@reub.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 11:41:54 -04:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: only validate the lock vs. f_mode in F_SETLK codepaths v2: replace missing break in switch statement (as pointed out by Dave Jones) commit bce7560d4946 (locks: consolidate checks for compatible filp->f_mode values in setlk handlers) introduced a regression in the F_GETLK handler. flock64_to_posix_lock is a shared codepath between F_GETLK and F_SETLK, but the f_mode checks should only be applicable to the F_SETLK codepaths according to POSIX. Instead of just reverting the patch, add a new function to do this checking and have the F_SETLK handlers call it. Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-and-Tested-by: Reuben Farrelly <reuben@reub.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 11:41:54 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] stale POSIX lock handling I believe that there is a problem with the handling of POSIX locks, which the attached patch should address. The problem appears to be a race between fcntl(2) and close(2). A multithreaded application could close a file descriptor at the same time as it is trying to acquire a lock using the same file descriptor. I would suggest that that multithreaded application is not providing the proper synchronization for itself, but the OS should still behave correctly. SUS3 (Single UNIX Specification Version 3, read: POSIX) indicates that when a file descriptor is closed, that all POSIX locks on the file, owned by the process which closed the file descriptor, should be released. The trick here is when those locks are released. The current code releases all locks which exist when close is processing, but any locks in progress are handled when the last reference to the open file is released. There are three cases to consider. One is the simple case, a multithreaded (mt) process has a file open and races to close it and acquire a lock on it. In this case, the close will release one reference to the open file and when the fcntl is done, it will release the other reference. For this situation, no locks should exist on the file when both the close and fcntl operations are done. The current system will handle this case because the last reference to the open file is being released. The second case is when the mt process has dup(2)'d the file descriptor. The close will release one reference to the file and the fcntl, when done, will release another, but there will still be at least one more reference to the open file. One could argue that the existence of a lock on the file after the close has completed is okay, because it was acquired after the close operation and there is still a way for the application to release the lock on the file, using an existing file descriptor. The third case is when the mt process has forked, after opening the file and either before or after becoming an mt process. In this case, each process would hold a reference to the open file. For each process, this degenerates to first case above. However, the lock continues to exist until both processes have released their references to the open file. This lock could block other lock requests. The changes to release the lock when the last reference to the open file aren't quite right because they would allow the lock to exist as long as there was a reference to the open file. This is too long. The new proposed solution is to add support in the fcntl code path to detect a race with close and then to release the lock which was just acquired when such as race is detected. This causes locks to be released in a timely fashion and for the system to conform to the POSIX semantic specification. This was tested by instrumenting a kernel to detect the handling locks and then running a program which generates case #3 above. A dangling lock could be reliably generated. When the changes to detect the close/fcntl race were added, a dangling lock could no longer be generated. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-27 11:45:09 -07:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
[PATCH] fix SMP ordering hole in fcntl_setlk() fcntl_setlk()/close() race prevention has a subtle hole - we need to make sure that if we *do* have an fcntl/close race on SMP box, the access to descriptor table and inode->i_flock won't get reordered. As it is, we get STORE inode->i_flock, LOAD descriptor table entry vs. STORE descriptor table entry, LOAD inode->i_flock with not a single lock in common on both sides. We do have BKL around the first STORE, but check in locks_remove_posix() is outside of BKL and for a good reason - we don't want BKL on common path of close(2). Solution is to hold ->file_lock around fcheck() in there; that orders us wrt removal from descriptor table that preceded locks_remove_posix() on close path and we either come first (in which case eviction will be handled by the close side) or we'll see the effect of close and do eviction ourselves. Note that even though it's read-only access, we do need ->file_lock here - rcu_read_lock() won't be enough to order the things. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2008-05-06 13:58:34 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
locks: only validate the lock vs. f_mode in F_SETLK codepaths v2: replace missing break in switch statement (as pointed out by Dave Jones) commit bce7560d4946 (locks: consolidate checks for compatible filp->f_mode values in setlk handlers) introduced a regression in the F_GETLK handler. flock64_to_posix_lock is a shared codepath between F_GETLK and F_SETLK, but the f_mode checks should only be applicable to the F_SETLK codepaths according to POSIX. Instead of just reverting the patch, add a new function to do this checking and have the F_SETLK handlers call it. Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-and-Tested-by: Reuben Farrelly <reuben@reub.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 11:41:54 -04:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
locks: rename FL_FILE_PVT and IS_FILE_PVT to use "*_OFDLCK" instead File-private locks have been re-christened as "open file description" locks. Finish the symbol name cleanup in the internal implementation. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-22 08:24:32 -04:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
locks: rename file-private locks to "open file description locks" File-private locks have been merged into Linux for v3.15, and *now* people are commenting that the name and macro definitions for the new file-private locks suck. ...and I can't even disagree. The names and command macros do suck. We're going to have to live with these for a long time, so it's important that we be happy with the names before we're stuck with them. The consensus on the lists so far is that they should be rechristened as "open file description locks". The name isn't a big deal for the kernel, but the command macros are not visually distinct enough from the traditional POSIX lock macros. The glibc and documentation folks are recommending that we change them to look like F_OFD_{GETLK|SETLK|SETLKW}. That lessens the chance that a programmer will typo one of the commands wrong, and also makes it easier to spot this difference when reading code. This patch makes the following changes that I think are necessary before v3.15 ships: 1) rename the command macros to their new names. These end up in the uapi headers and so are part of the external-facing API. It turns out that glibc doesn't actually use the fcntl.h uapi header, but it's hard to be sure that something else won't. Changing it now is safest. 2) make the the /proc/locks output display these as type "OFDLCK" Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@mindspring.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-22 08:23:58 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
locks: rename file-private locks to "open file description locks" File-private locks have been merged into Linux for v3.15, and *now* people are commenting that the name and macro definitions for the new file-private locks suck. ...and I can't even disagree. The names and command macros do suck. We're going to have to live with these for a long time, so it's important that we be happy with the names before we're stuck with them. The consensus on the lists so far is that they should be rechristened as "open file description locks". The name isn't a big deal for the kernel, but the command macros are not visually distinct enough from the traditional POSIX lock macros. The glibc and documentation folks are recommending that we change them to look like F_OFD_{GETLK|SETLK|SETLKW}. That lessens the chance that a programmer will typo one of the commands wrong, and also makes it easier to spot this difference when reading code. This patch makes the following changes that I think are necessary before v3.15 ships: 1) rename the command macros to their new names. These end up in the uapi headers and so are part of the external-facing API. It turns out that glibc doesn't actually use the fcntl.h uapi header, but it's hard to be sure that something else won't. Changing it now is safest. 2) make the the /proc/locks output display these as type "OFDLCK" Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@mindspring.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-22 08:23:58 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-08-23 17:36:59 -05:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
locks: cleanup code duplication Extract common code into a function. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:57 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] stale POSIX lock handling I believe that there is a problem with the handling of POSIX locks, which the attached patch should address. The problem appears to be a race between fcntl(2) and close(2). A multithreaded application could close a file descriptor at the same time as it is trying to acquire a lock using the same file descriptor. I would suggest that that multithreaded application is not providing the proper synchronization for itself, but the OS should still behave correctly. SUS3 (Single UNIX Specification Version 3, read: POSIX) indicates that when a file descriptor is closed, that all POSIX locks on the file, owned by the process which closed the file descriptor, should be released. The trick here is when those locks are released. The current code releases all locks which exist when close is processing, but any locks in progress are handled when the last reference to the open file is released. There are three cases to consider. One is the simple case, a multithreaded (mt) process has a file open and races to close it and acquire a lock on it. In this case, the close will release one reference to the open file and when the fcntl is done, it will release the other reference. For this situation, no locks should exist on the file when both the close and fcntl operations are done. The current system will handle this case because the last reference to the open file is being released. The second case is when the mt process has dup(2)'d the file descriptor. The close will release one reference to the file and the fcntl, when done, will release another, but there will still be at least one more reference to the open file. One could argue that the existence of a lock on the file after the close has completed is okay, because it was acquired after the close operation and there is still a way for the application to release the lock on the file, using an existing file descriptor. The third case is when the mt process has forked, after opening the file and either before or after becoming an mt process. In this case, each process would hold a reference to the open file. For each process, this degenerates to first case above. However, the lock continues to exist until both processes have released their references to the open file. This lock could block other lock requests. The changes to release the lock when the last reference to the open file aren't quite right because they would allow the lock to exist as long as there was a reference to the open file. This is too long. The new proposed solution is to add support in the fcntl code path to detect a race with close and then to release the lock which was just acquired when such as race is detected. This causes locks to be released in a timely fashion and for the system to conform to the POSIX semantic specification. This was tested by instrumenting a kernel to detect the handling locks and then running a program which generates case #3 above. A dangling lock could be reliably generated. When the changes to detect the close/fcntl race were added, a dangling lock could no longer be generated. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-27 11:45:09 -07:00
locks: don't check for race with close when setting OFD lock We don't clean out OFD locks on close(), so there's no need to check for a race with them here. They'll get cleaned out at the same time that flock locks are. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-08 07:30:43 -05:00
[PATCH] stale POSIX lock handling I believe that there is a problem with the handling of POSIX locks, which the attached patch should address. The problem appears to be a race between fcntl(2) and close(2). A multithreaded application could close a file descriptor at the same time as it is trying to acquire a lock using the same file descriptor. I would suggest that that multithreaded application is not providing the proper synchronization for itself, but the OS should still behave correctly. SUS3 (Single UNIX Specification Version 3, read: POSIX) indicates that when a file descriptor is closed, that all POSIX locks on the file, owned by the process which closed the file descriptor, should be released. The trick here is when those locks are released. The current code releases all locks which exist when close is processing, but any locks in progress are handled when the last reference to the open file is released. There are three cases to consider. One is the simple case, a multithreaded (mt) process has a file open and races to close it and acquire a lock on it. In this case, the close will release one reference to the open file and when the fcntl is done, it will release the other reference. For this situation, no locks should exist on the file when both the close and fcntl operations are done. The current system will handle this case because the last reference to the open file is being released. The second case is when the mt process has dup(2)'d the file descriptor. The close will release one reference to the file and the fcntl, when done, will release another, but there will still be at least one more reference to the open file. One could argue that the existence of a lock on the file after the close has completed is okay, because it was acquired after the close operation and there is still a way for the application to release the lock on the file, using an existing file descriptor. The third case is when the mt process has forked, after opening the file and either before or after becoming an mt process. In this case, each process would hold a reference to the open file. For each process, this degenerates to first case above. However, the lock continues to exist until both processes have released their references to the open file. This lock could block other lock requests. The changes to release the lock when the last reference to the open file aren't quite right because they would allow the lock to exist as long as there was a reference to the open file. This is too long. The new proposed solution is to add support in the fcntl code path to detect a race with close and then to release the lock which was just acquired when such as race is detected. This causes locks to be released in a timely fashion and for the system to conform to the POSIX semantic specification. This was tested by instrumenting a kernel to detect the handling locks and then running a program which generates case #3 above. A dangling lock could be reliably generated. When the changes to detect the close/fcntl race were added, a dangling lock could no longer be generated. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-27 11:45:09 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
file: Factor files_lookup_fd_locked out of fcheck_files To make it easy to tell where files->file_lock protection is being used when looking up a file create files_lookup_fd_locked. Only allow this function to be called with the file_lock held. Update the callers of fcheck and fcheck_files that are called with the files->file_lock held to call files_lookup_fd_locked instead. Hopefully this makes it easier to quickly understand what is going on. The need for better names became apparent in the last round of discussion of this set of changes[1]. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wj8BQbgJFLa+J0e=iT-1qpmCRTbPAJ8gd6MJQ=kbRPqyQ@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-8-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-11-20 17:14:25 -06:00
locks: fix unlock when fcntl_setlk races with a close Dmitry reported that he was able to reproduce the WARN_ON_ONCE that fires in locks_free_lock_context when the flc_posix list isn't empty. The problem turns out to be that we're basically rebuilding the file_lock from scratch in fcntl_setlk when we discover that the setlk has raced with a close. If the l_whence field is SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END, then we may end up with fl_start and fl_end values that differ from when the lock was initially set, if the file position or length of the file has changed in the interim. Fix this by just reusing the same lock request structure, and simply override fl_type value with F_UNLCK as appropriate. That ensures that we really are unlocking the lock that was initially set. While we're there, make sure that we do pop a WARN_ON_ONCE if the removal ever fails. Also return -EBADF in this event, since that's what we would have returned if the close had happened earlier. Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: c293621bbf67 (stale POSIX lock handling) Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-07 16:38:10 -05:00
file: Factor files_lookup_fd_locked out of fcheck_files To make it easy to tell where files->file_lock protection is being used when looking up a file create files_lookup_fd_locked. Only allow this function to be called with the file_lock held. Update the callers of fcheck and fcheck_files that are called with the files->file_lock held to call files_lookup_fd_locked instead. Hopefully this makes it easier to quickly understand what is going on. The need for better names became apparent in the last round of discussion of this set of changes[1]. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wj8BQbgJFLa+J0e=iT-1qpmCRTbPAJ8gd6MJQ=kbRPqyQ@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-8-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-11-20 17:14:25 -06:00
locks: fix unlock when fcntl_setlk races with a close Dmitry reported that he was able to reproduce the WARN_ON_ONCE that fires in locks_free_lock_context when the flc_posix list isn't empty. The problem turns out to be that we're basically rebuilding the file_lock from scratch in fcntl_setlk when we discover that the setlk has raced with a close. If the l_whence field is SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END, then we may end up with fl_start and fl_end values that differ from when the lock was initially set, if the file position or length of the file has changed in the interim. Fix this by just reusing the same lock request structure, and simply override fl_type value with F_UNLCK as appropriate. That ensures that we really are unlocking the lock that was initially set. While we're there, make sure that we do pop a WARN_ON_ONCE if the removal ever fails. Also return -EBADF in this event, since that's what we would have returned if the close had happened earlier. Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: c293621bbf67 (stale POSIX lock handling) Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-07 16:38:10 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: fix unlock when fcntl_setlk races with a close Dmitry reported that he was able to reproduce the WARN_ON_ONCE that fires in locks_free_lock_context when the flc_posix list isn't empty. The problem turns out to be that we're basically rebuilding the file_lock from scratch in fcntl_setlk when we discover that the setlk has raced with a close. If the l_whence field is SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END, then we may end up with fl_start and fl_end values that differ from when the lock was initially set, if the file position or length of the file has changed in the interim. Fix this by just reusing the same lock request structure, and simply override fl_type value with F_UNLCK as appropriate. That ensures that we really are unlocking the lock that was initially set. While we're there, make sure that we do pop a WARN_ON_ONCE if the removal ever fails. Also return -EBADF in this event, since that's what we would have returned if the close had happened earlier. Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: c293621bbf67 (stale POSIX lock handling) Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-07 16:38:10 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] stale POSIX lock handling I believe that there is a problem with the handling of POSIX locks, which the attached patch should address. The problem appears to be a race between fcntl(2) and close(2). A multithreaded application could close a file descriptor at the same time as it is trying to acquire a lock using the same file descriptor. I would suggest that that multithreaded application is not providing the proper synchronization for itself, but the OS should still behave correctly. SUS3 (Single UNIX Specification Version 3, read: POSIX) indicates that when a file descriptor is closed, that all POSIX locks on the file, owned by the process which closed the file descriptor, should be released. The trick here is when those locks are released. The current code releases all locks which exist when close is processing, but any locks in progress are handled when the last reference to the open file is released. There are three cases to consider. One is the simple case, a multithreaded (mt) process has a file open and races to close it and acquire a lock on it. In this case, the close will release one reference to the open file and when the fcntl is done, it will release the other reference. For this situation, no locks should exist on the file when both the close and fcntl operations are done. The current system will handle this case because the last reference to the open file is being released. The second case is when the mt process has dup(2)'d the file descriptor. The close will release one reference to the file and the fcntl, when done, will release another, but there will still be at least one more reference to the open file. One could argue that the existence of a lock on the file after the close has completed is okay, because it was acquired after the close operation and there is still a way for the application to release the lock on the file, using an existing file descriptor. The third case is when the mt process has forked, after opening the file and either before or after becoming an mt process. In this case, each process would hold a reference to the open file. For each process, this degenerates to first case above. However, the lock continues to exist until both processes have released their references to the open file. This lock could block other lock requests. The changes to release the lock when the last reference to the open file aren't quite right because they would allow the lock to exist as long as there was a reference to the open file. This is too long. The new proposed solution is to add support in the fcntl code path to detect a race with close and then to release the lock which was just acquired when such as race is detected. This causes locks to be released in a timely fashion and for the system to conform to the POSIX semantic specification. This was tested by instrumenting a kernel to detect the handling locks and then running a program which generates case #3 above. A dangling lock could be reliably generated. When the changes to detect the close/fcntl race were added, a dangling lock could no longer be generated. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-27 11:45:09 -07:00
locks: sprinkle some tracepoints around the file locking code Add some tracepoints around the POSIX locking code. These were useful when tracking down problems when handling the race between setlk and close. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-06 21:26:10 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: F_UNLCK extension for F_OFD_GETLK Currently F_UNLCK with F_OFD_GETLK returns -EINVAL. This patch changes it such that specifying F_UNLCK returns information only about OFD locks that are owned by the given file description. Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2023-06-22 21:52:23 +05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: rename file-private locks to "open file description locks" File-private locks have been merged into Linux for v3.15, and *now* people are commenting that the name and macro definitions for the new file-private locks suck. ...and I can't even disagree. The names and command macros do suck. We're going to have to live with these for a long time, so it's important that we be happy with the names before we're stuck with them. The consensus on the lists so far is that they should be rechristened as "open file description locks". The name isn't a big deal for the kernel, but the command macros are not visually distinct enough from the traditional POSIX lock macros. The glibc and documentation folks are recommending that we change them to look like F_OFD_{GETLK|SETLK|SETLKW}. That lessens the chance that a programmer will typo one of the commands wrong, and also makes it easier to spot this difference when reading code. This patch makes the following changes that I think are necessary before v3.15 ships: 1) rename the command macros to their new names. These end up in the uapi headers and so are part of the external-facing API. It turns out that glibc doesn't actually use the fcntl.h uapi header, but it's hard to be sure that something else won't. Changing it now is safest. 2) make the the /proc/locks output display these as type "OFDLCK" Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@mindspring.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-22 08:23:58 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
locks: factor out generic/filesystem switch from test_lock Factor out the code that switches between generic and filesystem-specific lock methods; eventually we want to call this from lock managers (lockd and nfsd) too; currently they only call the generic methods. This patch does that for test_lock. Note that this hasn't been necessary until recently, because the few filesystems that define ->lock() (nfs, cifs...) aren't exportable via NFS. However GFS (and, in the future, other cluster filesystems) need to implement their own locking to get cluster-coherent locking, and also want to be able to export locking to NFS (lockd and NFSv4). So we accomplish this by factoring out code such as this and exporting it for the use of lockd and nfsd. Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-02-21 00:58:50 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
locks: Copy fl_lmops information for conflock in locks_copy_conflock() Commit d5b9026a67 ([PATCH] knfsd: locks: flag NFSv4-owned locks) using fl_lmops field in file_lock for checking nfsd4 lockowner. But, commit 1a747ee0cc (locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return of conflicting locks) causes the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL. Also, commit 0996905f93 (lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock()) caused the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL too. Make sure copy the private information by fl_copy_lock() in struct file_lock_operations, merge __locks_copy_lock() to fl_copy_lock(). Jeff advice, "Set fl_lmops on conflocks, but don't set fl_ops. fl_ops are superfluous, since they are callbacks into the filesystem. There should be no need to bother the filesystem at all with info in a conflock. But, lock _ownership_ matters for conflocks and that's indicated by the fl_lmops. So you really do want to copy the fl_lmops for conflocks I think." v5: add missing calling of locks_release_private() in nlmsvc_testlock() v4: only copy fl_lmops for conflock, don't copy fl_ops Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-22 10:18:43 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk() Struct file_lock is fairly large, so let's save some space on the stack by using an allocation for struct file_lock in fcntl_getlk(), just as we do for fcntl_setlk(). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:21 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] stale POSIX lock handling I believe that there is a problem with the handling of POSIX locks, which the attached patch should address. The problem appears to be a race between fcntl(2) and close(2). A multithreaded application could close a file descriptor at the same time as it is trying to acquire a lock using the same file descriptor. I would suggest that that multithreaded application is not providing the proper synchronization for itself, but the OS should still behave correctly. SUS3 (Single UNIX Specification Version 3, read: POSIX) indicates that when a file descriptor is closed, that all POSIX locks on the file, owned by the process which closed the file descriptor, should be released. The trick here is when those locks are released. The current code releases all locks which exist when close is processing, but any locks in progress are handled when the last reference to the open file is released. There are three cases to consider. One is the simple case, a multithreaded (mt) process has a file open and races to close it and acquire a lock on it. In this case, the close will release one reference to the open file and when the fcntl is done, it will release the other reference. For this situation, no locks should exist on the file when both the close and fcntl operations are done. The current system will handle this case because the last reference to the open file is being released. The second case is when the mt process has dup(2)'d the file descriptor. The close will release one reference to the file and the fcntl, when done, will release another, but there will still be at least one more reference to the open file. One could argue that the existence of a lock on the file after the close has completed is okay, because it was acquired after the close operation and there is still a way for the application to release the lock on the file, using an existing file descriptor. The third case is when the mt process has forked, after opening the file and either before or after becoming an mt process. In this case, each process would hold a reference to the open file. For each process, this degenerates to first case above. However, the lock continues to exist until both processes have released their references to the open file. This lock could block other lock requests. The changes to release the lock when the last reference to the open file aren't quite right because they would allow the lock to exist as long as there was a reference to the open file. This is too long. The new proposed solution is to add support in the fcntl code path to detect a race with close and then to release the lock which was just acquired when such as race is detected. This causes locks to be released in a timely fashion and for the system to conform to the POSIX semantic specification. This was tested by instrumenting a kernel to detect the handling locks and then running a program which generates case #3 above. A dangling lock could be reliably generated. When the changes to detect the close/fcntl race were added, a dangling lock could no longer be generated. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-27 11:45:09 -07:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] fix SMP ordering hole in fcntl_setlk() fcntl_setlk()/close() race prevention has a subtle hole - we need to make sure that if we *do* have an fcntl/close race on SMP box, the access to descriptor table and inode->i_flock won't get reordered. As it is, we get STORE inode->i_flock, LOAD descriptor table entry vs. STORE descriptor table entry, LOAD inode->i_flock with not a single lock in common on both sides. We do have BKL around the first STORE, but check in locks_remove_posix() is outside of BKL and for a good reason - we don't want BKL on common path of close(2). Solution is to hold ->file_lock around fcheck() in there; that orders us wrt removal from descriptor table that preceded locks_remove_posix() on close path and we either come first (in which case eviction will be handled by the close side) or we'll see the effect of close and do eviction ourselves. Note that even though it's read-only access, we do need ->file_lock here - rcu_read_lock() won't be enough to order the things. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2008-05-06 13:58:34 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
locks: only validate the lock vs. f_mode in F_SETLK codepaths v2: replace missing break in switch statement (as pointed out by Dave Jones) commit bce7560d4946 (locks: consolidate checks for compatible filp->f_mode values in setlk handlers) introduced a regression in the F_GETLK handler. flock64_to_posix_lock is a shared codepath between F_GETLK and F_SETLK, but the f_mode checks should only be applicable to the F_SETLK codepaths according to POSIX. Instead of just reverting the patch, add a new function to do this checking and have the F_SETLK handlers call it. Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Reported-and-Tested-by: Reuben Farrelly <reuben@reub.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 11:41:54 -04:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
locks: rename FL_FILE_PVT and IS_FILE_PVT to use "*_OFDLCK" instead File-private locks have been re-christened as "open file description" locks. Finish the symbol name cleanup in the internal implementation. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-22 08:24:32 -04:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
locks: rename file-private locks to "open file description locks" File-private locks have been merged into Linux for v3.15, and *now* people are commenting that the name and macro definitions for the new file-private locks suck. ...and I can't even disagree. The names and command macros do suck. We're going to have to live with these for a long time, so it's important that we be happy with the names before we're stuck with them. The consensus on the lists so far is that they should be rechristened as "open file description locks". The name isn't a big deal for the kernel, but the command macros are not visually distinct enough from the traditional POSIX lock macros. The glibc and documentation folks are recommending that we change them to look like F_OFD_{GETLK|SETLK|SETLKW}. That lessens the chance that a programmer will typo one of the commands wrong, and also makes it easier to spot this difference when reading code. This patch makes the following changes that I think are necessary before v3.15 ships: 1) rename the command macros to their new names. These end up in the uapi headers and so are part of the external-facing API. It turns out that glibc doesn't actually use the fcntl.h uapi header, but it's hard to be sure that something else won't. Changing it now is safest. 2) make the the /proc/locks output display these as type "OFDLCK" Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@mindspring.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-22 08:23:58 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
locks: rename file-private locks to "open file description locks" File-private locks have been merged into Linux for v3.15, and *now* people are commenting that the name and macro definitions for the new file-private locks suck. ...and I can't even disagree. The names and command macros do suck. We're going to have to live with these for a long time, so it's important that we be happy with the names before we're stuck with them. The consensus on the lists so far is that they should be rechristened as "open file description locks". The name isn't a big deal for the kernel, but the command macros are not visually distinct enough from the traditional POSIX lock macros. The glibc and documentation folks are recommending that we change them to look like F_OFD_{GETLK|SETLK|SETLKW}. That lessens the chance that a programmer will typo one of the commands wrong, and also makes it easier to spot this difference when reading code. This patch makes the following changes that I think are necessary before v3.15 ships: 1) rename the command macros to their new names. These end up in the uapi headers and so are part of the external-facing API. It turns out that glibc doesn't actually use the fcntl.h uapi header, but it's hard to be sure that something else won't. Changing it now is safest. 2) make the the /proc/locks output display these as type "OFDLCK" Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@mindspring.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-04-22 08:23:58 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
fs/locks: pass kernel struct flock to fcntl_getlk/setlk This will make it easier to implement a sane compat fcntl syscall. [ jlayton: fix undeclared identifiers in 32-bit fcntl64 syscall handler ] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-05-27 06:07:19 -04:00
locks: require that flock->l_pid be set to 0 for file-private locks Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing callers. Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-03-04 10:30:23 -05:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-08-23 17:36:59 -05:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
locks: cleanup code duplication Extract common code into a function. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 01:48:57 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
[PATCH] stale POSIX lock handling I believe that there is a problem with the handling of POSIX locks, which the attached patch should address. The problem appears to be a race between fcntl(2) and close(2). A multithreaded application could close a file descriptor at the same time as it is trying to acquire a lock using the same file descriptor. I would suggest that that multithreaded application is not providing the proper synchronization for itself, but the OS should still behave correctly. SUS3 (Single UNIX Specification Version 3, read: POSIX) indicates that when a file descriptor is closed, that all POSIX locks on the file, owned by the process which closed the file descriptor, should be released. The trick here is when those locks are released. The current code releases all locks which exist when close is processing, but any locks in progress are handled when the last reference to the open file is released. There are three cases to consider. One is the simple case, a multithreaded (mt) process has a file open and races to close it and acquire a lock on it. In this case, the close will release one reference to the open file and when the fcntl is done, it will release the other reference. For this situation, no locks should exist on the file when both the close and fcntl operations are done. The current system will handle this case because the last reference to the open file is being released. The second case is when the mt process has dup(2)'d the file descriptor. The close will release one reference to the file and the fcntl, when done, will release another, but there will still be at least one more reference to the open file. One could argue that the existence of a lock on the file after the close has completed is okay, because it was acquired after the close operation and there is still a way for the application to release the lock on the file, using an existing file descriptor. The third case is when the mt process has forked, after opening the file and either before or after becoming an mt process. In this case, each process would hold a reference to the open file. For each process, this degenerates to first case above. However, the lock continues to exist until both processes have released their references to the open file. This lock could block other lock requests. The changes to release the lock when the last reference to the open file aren't quite right because they would allow the lock to exist as long as there was a reference to the open file. This is too long. The new proposed solution is to add support in the fcntl code path to detect a race with close and then to release the lock which was just acquired when such as race is detected. This causes locks to be released in a timely fashion and for the system to conform to the POSIX semantic specification. This was tested by instrumenting a kernel to detect the handling locks and then running a program which generates case #3 above. A dangling lock could be reliably generated. When the changes to detect the close/fcntl race were added, a dangling lock could no longer be generated. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-27 11:45:09 -07:00
locks: don't check for race with close when setting OFD lock We don't clean out OFD locks on close(), so there's no need to check for a race with them here. They'll get cleaned out at the same time that flock locks are. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-08 07:30:43 -05:00
[PATCH] stale POSIX lock handling I believe that there is a problem with the handling of POSIX locks, which the attached patch should address. The problem appears to be a race between fcntl(2) and close(2). A multithreaded application could close a file descriptor at the same time as it is trying to acquire a lock using the same file descriptor. I would suggest that that multithreaded application is not providing the proper synchronization for itself, but the OS should still behave correctly. SUS3 (Single UNIX Specification Version 3, read: POSIX) indicates that when a file descriptor is closed, that all POSIX locks on the file, owned by the process which closed the file descriptor, should be released. The trick here is when those locks are released. The current code releases all locks which exist when close is processing, but any locks in progress are handled when the last reference to the open file is released. There are three cases to consider. One is the simple case, a multithreaded (mt) process has a file open and races to close it and acquire a lock on it. In this case, the close will release one reference to the open file and when the fcntl is done, it will release the other reference. For this situation, no locks should exist on the file when both the close and fcntl operations are done. The current system will handle this case because the last reference to the open file is being released. The second case is when the mt process has dup(2)'d the file descriptor. The close will release one reference to the file and the fcntl, when done, will release another, but there will still be at least one more reference to the open file. One could argue that the existence of a lock on the file after the close has completed is okay, because it was acquired after the close operation and there is still a way for the application to release the lock on the file, using an existing file descriptor. The third case is when the mt process has forked, after opening the file and either before or after becoming an mt process. In this case, each process would hold a reference to the open file. For each process, this degenerates to first case above. However, the lock continues to exist until both processes have released their references to the open file. This lock could block other lock requests. The changes to release the lock when the last reference to the open file aren't quite right because they would allow the lock to exist as long as there was a reference to the open file. This is too long. The new proposed solution is to add support in the fcntl code path to detect a race with close and then to release the lock which was just acquired when such as race is detected. This causes locks to be released in a timely fashion and for the system to conform to the POSIX semantic specification. This was tested by instrumenting a kernel to detect the handling locks and then running a program which generates case #3 above. A dangling lock could be reliably generated. When the changes to detect the close/fcntl race were added, a dangling lock could no longer be generated. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-27 11:45:09 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
file: Factor files_lookup_fd_locked out of fcheck_files To make it easy to tell where files->file_lock protection is being used when looking up a file create files_lookup_fd_locked. Only allow this function to be called with the file_lock held. Update the callers of fcheck and fcheck_files that are called with the files->file_lock held to call files_lookup_fd_locked instead. Hopefully this makes it easier to quickly understand what is going on. The need for better names became apparent in the last round of discussion of this set of changes[1]. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wj8BQbgJFLa+J0e=iT-1qpmCRTbPAJ8gd6MJQ=kbRPqyQ@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-8-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-11-20 17:14:25 -06:00
locks: fix unlock when fcntl_setlk races with a close Dmitry reported that he was able to reproduce the WARN_ON_ONCE that fires in locks_free_lock_context when the flc_posix list isn't empty. The problem turns out to be that we're basically rebuilding the file_lock from scratch in fcntl_setlk when we discover that the setlk has raced with a close. If the l_whence field is SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END, then we may end up with fl_start and fl_end values that differ from when the lock was initially set, if the file position or length of the file has changed in the interim. Fix this by just reusing the same lock request structure, and simply override fl_type value with F_UNLCK as appropriate. That ensures that we really are unlocking the lock that was initially set. While we're there, make sure that we do pop a WARN_ON_ONCE if the removal ever fails. Also return -EBADF in this event, since that's what we would have returned if the close had happened earlier. Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: c293621bbf67 (stale POSIX lock handling) Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-07 16:38:10 -05:00
file: Factor files_lookup_fd_locked out of fcheck_files To make it easy to tell where files->file_lock protection is being used when looking up a file create files_lookup_fd_locked. Only allow this function to be called with the file_lock held. Update the callers of fcheck and fcheck_files that are called with the files->file_lock held to call files_lookup_fd_locked instead. Hopefully this makes it easier to quickly understand what is going on. The need for better names became apparent in the last round of discussion of this set of changes[1]. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wj8BQbgJFLa+J0e=iT-1qpmCRTbPAJ8gd6MJQ=kbRPqyQ@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-8-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-11-20 17:14:25 -06:00
locks: fix unlock when fcntl_setlk races with a close Dmitry reported that he was able to reproduce the WARN_ON_ONCE that fires in locks_free_lock_context when the flc_posix list isn't empty. The problem turns out to be that we're basically rebuilding the file_lock from scratch in fcntl_setlk when we discover that the setlk has raced with a close. If the l_whence field is SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END, then we may end up with fl_start and fl_end values that differ from when the lock was initially set, if the file position or length of the file has changed in the interim. Fix this by just reusing the same lock request structure, and simply override fl_type value with F_UNLCK as appropriate. That ensures that we really are unlocking the lock that was initially set. While we're there, make sure that we do pop a WARN_ON_ONCE if the removal ever fails. Also return -EBADF in this event, since that's what we would have returned if the close had happened earlier. Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: c293621bbf67 (stale POSIX lock handling) Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-07 16:38:10 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: fix unlock when fcntl_setlk races with a close Dmitry reported that he was able to reproduce the WARN_ON_ONCE that fires in locks_free_lock_context when the flc_posix list isn't empty. The problem turns out to be that we're basically rebuilding the file_lock from scratch in fcntl_setlk when we discover that the setlk has raced with a close. If the l_whence field is SEEK_CUR or SEEK_END, then we may end up with fl_start and fl_end values that differ from when the lock was initially set, if the file position or length of the file has changed in the interim. Fix this by just reusing the same lock request structure, and simply override fl_type value with F_UNLCK as appropriate. That ensures that we really are unlocking the lock that was initially set. While we're there, make sure that we do pop a WARN_ON_ONCE if the removal ever fails. Also return -EBADF in this event, since that's what we would have returned if the close had happened earlier. Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: c293621bbf67 (stale POSIX lock handling) Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-07 16:38:10 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: sprinkle some tracepoints around the file locking code Add some tracepoints around the POSIX locking code. These were useful when tracking down problems when handling the race between setlk and close. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-06 21:26:10 -05:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
[PATCH] locks: clean up locks_remove_posix() locks_remove_posix() can use posix_lock_file() instead of doing the lock removal by hand. posix_lock_file() now does exacly the same. The comment about pids no longer applies, posix_lock_file() takes only the owner into account. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-23 02:05:11 -07:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: add a new locks_inode_context accessor function There are a number of places in the kernel that are accessing the inode->i_flctx field without smp_load_acquire. This is required to ensure that the caller doesn't see a partially-initialized structure. Add a new accessor function for it to make this clear and convert all of the relevant accesses in locks.c to use it. Also, convert locks_free_lock_context to use the helper as well instead of just doing a "bare" assignment. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-16 09:02:30 -05:00
locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: use properly initialized file_lock when unlocking. Both locks_remove_posix() and locks_remove_flock() use a struct file_lock without calling locks_init_lock() on it. This means the various list_heads are not initialized, which will become a problem with a later patch. So change them both to initialize properly. For flock locks, this involves using flock_make_lock(), and changing it to allow a file_lock to be passed in, so memory allocation isn't always needed. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: sprinkle some tracepoints around the file locking code Add some tracepoints around the POSIX locking code. These were useful when tracking down problems when handling the race between setlk and close. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-01-06 21:26:10 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: fix file locking on overlayfs This patch allows flock, posix locks, ofd locks and leases to work correctly on overlayfs. Instead of using the underlying inode for storing lock context use the overlay inode. This allows locks to be persistent across copy-up. This is done by introducing locks_inode() helper and using it instead of file_inode() to get the inode in locking code. For non-overlayfs the two are equivalent, except for an extra pointer dereference in locks_inode(). Since lock operations are in "struct file_operations" we must also make sure not to call underlying filesystem's lock operations. Introcude a super block flag MS_NOREMOTELOCK to this effect. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2016-09-16 12:44:20 +02:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: consolidate NULL i_flctx checks in locks_remove_file We have each of the locks_remove_* variants doing this individually. Have the caller do it instead, and have locks_remove_flock and locks_remove_lease just assume that it's a valid pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:58 -05:00
locks: have locks_release_file use flock_lock_file to release generic flock locks ...instead of open-coding it and removing flock locks directly. This helps consolidate the flock lock removal logic into a single spot. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: have locks_release_file use flock_lock_file to release generic flock locks ...instead of open-coding it and removing flock locks directly. This helps consolidate the flock lock removal logic into a single spot. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
fs/locks: use properly initialized file_lock when unlocking. Both locks_remove_posix() and locks_remove_flock() use a struct file_lock without calling locks_init_lock() on it. This means the various list_heads are not initialized, which will become a problem with a later patch. So change them both to initialize properly. For flock locks, this involves using flock_make_lock(), and changing it to allow a file_lock to be passed in, so memory allocation isn't always needed. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
locks: have locks_release_file use flock_lock_file to release generic flock locks ...instead of open-coding it and removing flock locks directly. This helps consolidate the flock lock removal logic into a single spot. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
locks: consolidate NULL i_flctx checks in locks_remove_file We have each of the locks_remove_* variants doing this individually. Have the caller do it instead, and have locks_remove_flock and locks_remove_lease just assume that it's a valid pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:58 -05:00
locks: have locks_release_file use flock_lock_file to release generic flock locks ...instead of open-coding it and removing flock locks directly. This helps consolidate the flock lock removal logic into a single spot. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
fs/lock: Don't allocate file_lock in flock_make_lock(). Two functions, flock syscall and locks_remove_flock(), call flock_make_lock(). It allocates struct file_lock from slab cache if its argument fl is NULL. When we call flock syscall, we pass NULL to allocate memory for struct file_lock. However, we always free it at the end by locks_free_lock(). We need not allocate it and instead should use a local variable as locks_remove_flock() does. Also, the validation for flock_translate_cmd() is not necessary for locks_remove_flock(). So we move the part to flock syscall and make flock_make_lock() return nothing. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-07-16 21:35:31 -07:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
fs/locks: use properly initialized file_lock when unlocking. Both locks_remove_posix() and locks_remove_flock() use a struct file_lock without calling locks_init_lock() on it. This means the various list_heads are not initialized, which will become a problem with a later patch. So change them both to initialize properly. For flock locks, this involves using flock_make_lock(), and changing it to allow a file_lock to be passed in, so memory allocation isn't always needed. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-11-30 10:04:08 +11:00
Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs" This partially reverts commit c568d68341be7030f5647def68851e469b21ca11. Overlayfs files will now automatically get the correct locks, no need to hack overlay support in VFS. It is a partial revert, because it leaves the locks_inode() calls in place and defines locks_inode() to file_inode(). We could revert those as well, but it would be unnecessary code churn and it makes sense to document that we are getting the inode for locking purposes. Don't revert MS_NOREMOTELOCK yet since that has been part of the userspace API for some time (though not in a useful way). Will try to remove internal flags later when the dust around the new mount API settles. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-07-18 15:44:43 +02:00
locks: have locks_release_file use flock_lock_file to release generic flock locks ...instead of open-coding it and removing flock locks directly. This helps consolidate the flock lock removal logic into a single spot. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
locks: have flock_lock_file take an inode pointer instead of a filp ...and rename it to better describe how it works. In order to fix a use-after-free in NFS, we need to be able to remove locks from an inode after the filp associated with them may have already been freed. flock_lock_file already only dereferences the filp to get to the inode, so just change it so the callers do that. All of the callers already pass in a lock request that has the fl_file set properly, so we don't need to pass it in individually. With that change it now only dereferences the filp to get to the inode, so just push that out to the callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Tested-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
2015-07-11 06:43:02 -04:00
locks: have locks_release_file use flock_lock_file to release generic flock locks ...instead of open-coding it and removing flock locks directly. This helps consolidate the flock lock removal logic into a single spot. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
locks: consolidate NULL i_flctx checks in locks_remove_file We have each of the locks_remove_* variants doing this individually. Have the caller do it instead, and have locks_remove_flock and locks_remove_lease just assume that it's a valid pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:58 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locks: consolidate NULL i_flctx checks in locks_remove_file We have each of the locks_remove_* variants doing this individually. Have the caller do it instead, and have locks_remove_flock and locks_remove_lease just assume that it's a valid pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:58 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
locks: only remove leases associated with the file being closed We don't want to remove all leases just because one filp was closed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-02-16 19:37:42 -05:00
locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:57 -05:00
locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove preempt_disable variants Effective revert commit: 87709e28dc7c ("fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable()") This is causing major pain for PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian did a lot of lockperf runs on 2 and 4 node machines with all preemption modes (PREEMPT=n should be an obvious NOP for this patch and thus serves as a good control) and no results showed significance over 2-sigma (the PREEMPT=n results were almost empty at 1-sigma). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-21 15:38:40 +01:00
locking, fs/locks: Add missing file_sem locks I overlooked a few code-paths that can lead to locks_delete_global_locks(). Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161008081228.GF3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-08 10:12:28 +02:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: rename locks_remove_flock to locks_remove_file This function currently removes leases in addition to flock locks and in a later patch we'll have it deal with file-private locks too. Rename it to locks_remove_file to indicate that it removes locks that are associated with a particular struct file, and not just flock locks. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:08 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: consolidate NULL i_flctx checks in locks_remove_file We have each of the locks_remove_* variants doing this individually. Have the caller do it instead, and have locks_remove_flock and locks_remove_lease just assume that it's a valid pointer. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:58 -05:00
locks: have locks_release_file use flock_lock_file to release generic flock locks ...instead of open-coding it and removing flock locks directly. This helps consolidate the flock lock removal logic into a single spot. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
locks: purge fl_owner_t from fs/locks.c Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-07-13 17:00:38 +02:00
locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor associated with the inode. This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished. Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads. This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance and behavior on close. This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired. Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the last reference to a filp is put. These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by the same process or on the same file descriptor. The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl() syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to "classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't see any need for it. Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:10 -05:00
locks: have locks_release_file use flock_lock_file to release generic flock locks ...instead of open-coding it and removing flock locks directly. This helps consolidate the flock lock removal logic into a single spot. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: have locks_release_file use flock_lock_file to release generic flock locks ...instead of open-coding it and removing flock locks directly. This helps consolidate the flock lock removal logic into a single spot. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:55 -05:00
fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx locks_get_lock_context() uses cmpxchg() to install i_flctx. cmpxchg() is a release operation which is correct. But it uses a plain load to load i_flctx. This is incorrect. Subsequent loads from i_flctx can hoist above the load of i_flctx pointer itself and observe uninitialized garbage there. This in turn can lead to corruption of ctx->flc_lock and other members. Documentation/memory-barriers.txt explicitly requires to use a barrier in such context: "A load-load control dependency requires a full read memory barrier". Use smp_load_acquire() in locks_get_lock_context() and in bunch of other functions that can proceed concurrently with locks_get_lock_context(). The data race was found with KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-09-21 09:43:06 +02:00
locks: restore a warn for leaked locks on close When locks.c moved to using file_lock_context, the check for any locks that were not released was moved from the __fput() to destroy_inode() path in commit 8634b51f6ca2 ("locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context"). This warning has been quite useful for catching bugs, particularly in NFS where lock handling still sees some churn. Let's bring back the warning for leaked locks on __fput, as this warning is much more likely to be seen and reported by users. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-21 13:36:25 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: add lock cancel command Lock managers need to be able to cancel pending lock requests. In the case where the exported filesystem manages its own locks, it's not sufficient just to call posix_unblock_lock(); we need to let the filesystem know what's happening too. We do this by adding a new fcntl lock command: FL_CANCELLK. Some day this might also be made available to userspace applications that could benefit from an asynchronous locking api. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 17:52:58 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs" This partially reverts commit c568d68341be7030f5647def68851e469b21ca11. Overlayfs files will now automatically get the correct locks, no need to hack overlay support in VFS. It is a partial revert, because it leaves the locks_inode() calls in place and defines locks_inode() to file_inode(). We could revert those as well, but it would be unnecessary code churn and it makes sense to document that we are getting the inode for locking purposes. Don't revert MS_NOREMOTELOCK yet since that has been part of the userspace API for some time (though not in a useful way). Will try to remove internal flags later when the dust around the new mount API settles. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2018-07-18 15:44:43 +02:00
locks: add lock cancel command Lock managers need to be able to cancel pending lock requests. In the case where the exported filesystem manages its own locks, it's not sufficient just to call posix_unblock_lock(); we need to let the filesystem know what's happening too. We do this by adding a new fcntl lock command: FL_CANCELLK. Some day this might also be made available to userspace applications that could benefit from an asynchronous locking api. Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2007-01-18 17:52:58 -05:00
filelock: new helper: vfs_inode_has_locks Ceph has a need to know whether a particular inode has any locks set on it. It's currently tracking that by a num_locks field in its filp->private_data, but that's problematic as it tries to decrement this field when releasing locks and that can race with the file being torn down. Add a new vfs_inode_has_locks helper that just returns whether any locks are currently held on the inode. Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-14 08:33:09 -05:00
filelock: add a new locks_inode_context accessor function There are a number of places in the kernel that are accessing the inode->i_flctx field without smp_load_acquire. This is required to ensure that the caller doesn't see a partially-initialized structure. Add a new accessor function for it to make this clear and convert all of the relevant accesses in locks.c to use it. Also, convert locks_free_lock_context to use the helper as well instead of just doing a "bare" assignment. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-16 09:02:30 -05:00
filelock: new helper: vfs_inode_has_locks Ceph has a need to know whether a particular inode has any locks set on it. It's currently tracking that by a num_locks field in its filp->private_data, but that's problematic as it tries to decrement this field when releasing locks and that can race with the file being torn down. Add a new vfs_inode_has_locks helper that just returns whether any locks are currently held on the inode. Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-14 08:33:09 -05:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
proc: move rest of /proc/locks to fs/locks.c Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
2008-10-04 22:34:18 +04:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: rename fl_pid variable in lock_get_status In later patches we're going to introduce some macros that will clash with the variable name here. Rename it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-3-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:44 -05:00
proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument syzbot found that touch /proc/testfile causes NULL pointer dereference at tomoyo_get_local_path() because inode of the dentry is NULL. Before c59f415a7cb6, Tomoyo received pid_ns from proc's s_fs_info directly. Since proc_pid_ns() can only work with inode, using it in the tomoyo_get_local_path() was wrong. To avoid creating more functions for getting proc_ns, change the argument type of the proc_pid_ns() function. Then, Tomoyo can use the existing super_block to get pid_ns. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0000000000002f0c7505a5b0e04c@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200518180738.2939611-1-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+c1af344512918c61362c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: c59f415a7cb6 ("Use proc_pid_ns() to get pid_namespace from the proc superblock") Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-05-18 20:07:38 +02:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
pid-namespaces-vs-locks-interaction fcntl(F_GETLK,..) can return pid of process for not current pid namespace (if process is belonged to the several namespaces). It is true also for pids in /proc/locks. So correct behavior is saving pointer to the struct pid of the process lock owner. Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Gusev <vgusev@openvz.org> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2008-01-17 00:07:08 +00:00
fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks Since commit c69899a17ca4 "NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update", NFSv4 has been inserting locks in rpciod worker context. The result is that the file_lock's fl_nspid is the kworker's pid instead of the original userspace pid. The fl_nspid is only used to represent the namespaced virtual pid number when displaying locks or returning from F_GETLK. There's no reason to set it for every inserted lock, since we can usually just look it up from fl_pid. So, instead of looking up and holding struct pid for every lock, let's just look up the virtual pid number from fl_pid when it is needed. That means we can remove fl_nspid entirely. The translaton and presentation of fl_pid should handle the following four cases: 1 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a remote lock: In this case, the filesystem should determine the l_pid to return here. Filesystems should indicate that the fl_pid represents a non-local pid value that should not be translated by returning an fl_pid <= 0. 2 - F_GETLK on a local file with a remote lock: This should be the l_pid of the lock manager process, and translated. 3 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a local lock, and 4 - F_GETLK on a local file with a local lock: These should be the translated l_pid of the local locking process. Fuse was already doing the correct thing by translating the pid into the caller's namespace. With this change we must update fuse to translate to init's pid namespace, so that the locks API can then translate from init's pid namespace into the pid namespace of the caller. With this change, the locks API will expect that if a filesystem returns a remote pid as opposed to a local pid for F_GETLK, that remote pid will be <= 0. This signifies that the pid is remote, and the locks API will forego translating that pid into the pid namespace of the local calling process. Finally, we convert remote filesystems to present remote pids using negative numbers. Have lustre, 9p, ceph, cifs, and dlm negate the remote pid returned for F_GETLK lock requests. Since local pids will never be larger than PID_MAX_LIMIT (which is currently defined as <= 4 million), but pid_t is an unsigned int, we should have plenty of room to represent remote pids with negative numbers if we assume that remote pid numbers are similarly limited. If this is not the case, then we run the risk of having a remote pid returned for which there is also a corresponding local pid. This is a problem we have now, but this patch should reduce the chances of that occurring, while also returning those remote pid numbers, for whatever that may be worth. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:22 -04:00
fs/lock: show locks taken by processes from another pidns Currently if we face a lock taken by a process invisible in the current pidns we skip the lock completely, but this 1) makes the output not that nice (root@vz7)/: cat /proc/${PID_A2}/fdinfo/3 pos: 4 flags: 02100002 mnt_id: 257 lock: (root@vz7)/: 2) makes it more difficult to debug issues with leaked flocks if you get error on lock, but don't see any locks in /proc/$id/fdinfo/$file Let's show information about such locks again as previously, but show zero in the owner pid field. After the patch: =============== (root@vz7)/:cat /proc/${PID_A2}/fdinfo/3 pos: 4 flags: 02100002 mnt_id: 295 lock: 1: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 0 b6:f8a61:529946 0 EOF Fixes: 9d5b86ac13c5 ("fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks") Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2018-06-08 17:27:12 +03:00
fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks Since commit c69899a17ca4 "NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update", NFSv4 has been inserting locks in rpciod worker context. The result is that the file_lock's fl_nspid is the kworker's pid instead of the original userspace pid. The fl_nspid is only used to represent the namespaced virtual pid number when displaying locks or returning from F_GETLK. There's no reason to set it for every inserted lock, since we can usually just look it up from fl_pid. So, instead of looking up and holding struct pid for every lock, let's just look up the virtual pid number from fl_pid when it is needed. That means we can remove fl_nspid entirely. The translaton and presentation of fl_pid should handle the following four cases: 1 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a remote lock: In this case, the filesystem should determine the l_pid to return here. Filesystems should indicate that the fl_pid represents a non-local pid value that should not be translated by returning an fl_pid <= 0. 2 - F_GETLK on a local file with a remote lock: This should be the l_pid of the lock manager process, and translated. 3 - F_GETLK on a remote file with a local lock, and 4 - F_GETLK on a local file with a local lock: These should be the translated l_pid of the local locking process. Fuse was already doing the correct thing by translating the pid into the caller's namespace. With this change we must update fuse to translate to init's pid namespace, so that the locks API can then translate from init's pid namespace into the pid namespace of the caller. With this change, the locks API will expect that if a filesystem returns a remote pid as opposed to a local pid for F_GETLK, that remote pid will be <= 0. This signifies that the pid is remote, and the locks API will forego translating that pid into the pid namespace of the local calling process. Finally, we convert remote filesystems to present remote pids using negative numbers. Have lustre, 9p, ceph, cifs, and dlm negate the remote pid returned for F_GETLK lock requests. Since local pids will never be larger than PID_MAX_LIMIT (which is currently defined as <= 4 million), but pid_t is an unsigned int, we should have plenty of room to represent remote pids with negative numbers if we assume that remote pid numbers are similarly limited. If this is not the case, then we run the risk of having a remote pid returned for which there is also a corresponding local pid. This is a problem we have now, but this patch should reduce the chances of that occurring, while also returning those remote pid numbers, for whatever that may be worth. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2017-07-16 10:28:22 -04:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
fs/locks.c: replace seq_printf by seq_puts Replace seq_printf where possible Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
fs/locks.c: replace seq_printf by seq_puts Replace seq_printf where possible Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
locks: make /proc/locks show IS_FILE_PVT locks as type "FLPVT" In a later patch, we'll be adding a new type of lock that's owned by the struct file instead of the files_struct. Those sorts of locks will be flagged with a new FL_FILE_PVT flag. Report these types of locks as "FLPVT" in /proc/locks to distinguish them from "classic" POSIX locks. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:09 -05:00
fs/locks.c: replace seq_printf by seq_puts Replace seq_printf where possible Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
locks: make /proc/locks show IS_FILE_PVT locks as type "FLPVT" In a later patch, we'll be adding a new type of lock that's owned by the struct file instead of the files_struct. Those sorts of locks will be flagged with a new FL_FILE_PVT flag. Report these types of locks as "FLPVT" in /proc/locks to distinguish them from "classic" POSIX locks. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:09 -05:00
fs: remove mandatory file locking support We added CONFIG_MANDATORY_FILE_LOCKING in 2015, and soon after turned it off in Fedora and RHEL8. Several other distros have followed suit. I've heard of one problem in all that time: Someone migrated from an older distro that supported "-o mand" to one that didn't, and the host had a fstab entry with "mand" in it which broke on reboot. They didn't actually _use_ mandatory locking so they just removed the mount option and moved on. This patch rips out mandatory locking support wholesale from the kernel, along with the Kconfig option and the Documentation file. It also changes the mount code to ignore the "mand" mount option instead of erroring out, and to throw a big, ugly warning. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-08-19 14:56:38 -04:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
locks: remove LOCK_MAND flock lock support As best I can tell, the logic for these has been broken for a long time (at least before the move to git), such that they never conflict with anything. Also, nothing checks for these flags and prevented opens or read/write behavior on the files. They don't seem to do anything. Given that, we can rip these symbols out of the kernel, and just make flock(2) return 0 when LOCK_MAND is set in order to preserve existing behavior. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-09-10 15:36:29 -04:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
filelock: drop the IS_* macros These don't add a lot of value over just open-coding the flag check. Suggested-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-16-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:57 -05:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
locks: show delegations as "DELEG" in /proc/locks Now that they are a distinct lease type, show them as such. Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
2014-08-11 13:36:54 -04:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
fs/locks.c: replace seq_printf by seq_puts Replace seq_printf where possible Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
fs/locks.c: replace seq_printf by seq_puts Replace seq_printf where possible Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks.c: replace seq_printf by seq_puts Replace seq_printf where possible Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks.c: replace seq_printf by seq_puts Replace seq_printf where possible Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: Fix procfs output for file leases Since commit 778fc546f749c588aa2f ("locks: fix tracking of inprogress lease breaks"), leases break don't change @fl_type but modifies @fl_flags. However, procfs's part haven't been updated. Previously, for a breaking lease the target type was printed (see target_leasetype()), as returns fcntl(F_GETLEASE). But now it's always "READ", as F_UNLCK no longer means "breaking". Unlike the previous one, this behaviour don't provide a complete description of the lease. There are /proc/pid/fdinfo/ outputs for a lease (the same for READ and WRITE) breaked by O_WRONLY. -- before: lock: 1: LEASE BREAKING READ 2558 08:03:815793 0 EOF -- after: lock: 1: LEASE BREAKING UNLCK 2558 08:03:815793 0 EOF Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2019-07-24 20:16:31 +03:00
locks: remove LOCK_MAND flock lock support As best I can tell, the logic for these has been broken for a long time (at least before the move to git), such that they never conflict with anything. Also, nothing checks for these flags and prevented opens or read/write behavior on the files. They don't seem to do anything. Given that, we can rip these symbols out of the kernel, and just make flock(2) return 0 when LOCK_MAND is set in order to preserve existing behavior. Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-09-10 15:36:29 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: get rid of WE_CAN_BREAK_LSLK_NOW dead code As Bruce points out, there's no compelling reason to change /proc/locks output at this point. If we did want to do this, then we'd almost certainly want to introduce a new file to display this info (maybe via debugfs?). Let's remove the dead WE_CAN_BREAK_LSLK_NOW ifdef here and just plan to stay with the legacy format. Reported-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-04-03 09:04:04 -04:00
filelock: rename fl_pid variable in lock_get_status In later patches we're going to introduce some macros that will clash with the variable name here. Rename it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-3-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:44 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: rename fl_pid variable in lock_get_status In later patches we're going to introduce some macros that will clash with the variable name here. Rename it. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-3-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:44 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
fs/locks.c: replace seq_printf by seq_puts Replace seq_printf where possible Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
2014-05-09 14:13:05 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
filelock: convert fl_blocker to file_lock_core Both locks and leases deal with fl_blocker. Switch the fl_blocker pointer in struct file_lock_core to point to the file_lock_core of the blocker instead of a file_lock structure. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-26-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:07 -05:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument syzbot found that touch /proc/testfile causes NULL pointer dereference at tomoyo_get_local_path() because inode of the dentry is NULL. Before c59f415a7cb6, Tomoyo received pid_ns from proc's s_fs_info directly. Since proc_pid_ns() can only work with inode, using it in the tomoyo_get_local_path() was wrong. To avoid creating more functions for getting proc_ns, change the argument type of the proc_pid_ns() function. Then, Tomoyo can use the existing super_block to get pid_ns. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0000000000002f0c7505a5b0e04c@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200518180738.2939611-1-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+c1af344512918c61362c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: c59f415a7cb6 ("Use proc_pid_ns() to get pid_namespace from the proc superblock") Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-05-18 20:07:38 +02:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
locks: Filter /proc/locks output on proc pid ns On busy container servers reading /proc/locks shows all the locks created by all clients. This can cause large latency spikes. In my case I observed lsof taking up to 5-10 seconds while processing around 50k locks. Fix this by limiting the locks shown only to those created in the same pidns as the one the proc fs was mounted in. When reading /proc/locks from the init_pid_ns proc instance then perform no filtering [ jlayton: reformat comments for 80 columns ] Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2016-08-17 16:18:46 -04:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Convert fs/locks.c to access fl_core fields direcly rather than using the backward-compatibility macros. Most of this was done with coccinelle, with a few by-hand fixups. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-18-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:01:59 -05:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
fs/locks.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each() fs/locks.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each() in posix_locks_deadlock() and get_locks_status() Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-02 11:21:34 -07:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X Let's show locks which are associated with a file descriptor in its fdinfo file. Currently we don't have a reliable way to determine who holds a lock. We can find some information in /proc/locks, but PID which is reported there can be wrong. For example, a process takes a lock, then forks a child and dies. In this case /proc/locks contains the parent pid, which can be reused by another process. $ cat /proc/locks ... 6: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF ... $ ps -C rpcbind PID TTY TIME CMD 332 ? 00:00:00 rpcbind $ cat /proc/332/fdinfo/4 pos: 0 flags: 0100000 mnt_id: 22 lock: 1: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF $ ls -l /proc/332/fd/4 lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Mar 5 14:43 /proc/332/fd/4 -> /run/rpcbind.lock $ ls -l /proc/324/fd/ total 0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 0 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 1 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:49 2 -> /dev/pts/0 You can see that the process with the 324 pid doesn't hold the lock. This information is required for proper dumping and restoring file locks. Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 12:49:38 -07:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X Let's show locks which are associated with a file descriptor in its fdinfo file. Currently we don't have a reliable way to determine who holds a lock. We can find some information in /proc/locks, but PID which is reported there can be wrong. For example, a process takes a lock, then forks a child and dies. In this case /proc/locks contains the parent pid, which can be reused by another process. $ cat /proc/locks ... 6: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF ... $ ps -C rpcbind PID TTY TIME CMD 332 ? 00:00:00 rpcbind $ cat /proc/332/fdinfo/4 pos: 0 flags: 0100000 mnt_id: 22 lock: 1: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF $ ls -l /proc/332/fd/4 lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Mar 5 14:43 /proc/332/fd/4 -> /run/rpcbind.lock $ ls -l /proc/324/fd/ total 0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 0 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 1 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:49 2 -> /dev/pts/0 You can see that the process with the 324 pid doesn't hold the lock. This information is required for proper dumping and restoring file locks. Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 12:49:38 -07:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X Let's show locks which are associated with a file descriptor in its fdinfo file. Currently we don't have a reliable way to determine who holds a lock. We can find some information in /proc/locks, but PID which is reported there can be wrong. For example, a process takes a lock, then forks a child and dies. In this case /proc/locks contains the parent pid, which can be reused by another process. $ cat /proc/locks ... 6: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF ... $ ps -C rpcbind PID TTY TIME CMD 332 ? 00:00:00 rpcbind $ cat /proc/332/fdinfo/4 pos: 0 flags: 0100000 mnt_id: 22 lock: 1: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF $ ls -l /proc/332/fd/4 lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Mar 5 14:43 /proc/332/fd/4 -> /run/rpcbind.lock $ ls -l /proc/324/fd/ total 0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 0 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 1 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:49 2 -> /dev/pts/0 You can see that the process with the 324 pid doesn't hold the lock. This information is required for proper dumping and restoring file locks. Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 12:49:38 -07:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X Let's show locks which are associated with a file descriptor in its fdinfo file. Currently we don't have a reliable way to determine who holds a lock. We can find some information in /proc/locks, but PID which is reported there can be wrong. For example, a process takes a lock, then forks a child and dies. In this case /proc/locks contains the parent pid, which can be reused by another process. $ cat /proc/locks ... 6: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF ... $ ps -C rpcbind PID TTY TIME CMD 332 ? 00:00:00 rpcbind $ cat /proc/332/fdinfo/4 pos: 0 flags: 0100000 mnt_id: 22 lock: 1: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF $ ls -l /proc/332/fd/4 lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Mar 5 14:43 /proc/332/fd/4 -> /run/rpcbind.lock $ ls -l /proc/324/fd/ total 0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 0 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 1 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:49 2 -> /dev/pts/0 You can see that the process with the 324 pid doesn't hold the lock. This information is required for proper dumping and restoring file locks. Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 12:49:38 -07:00
filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Reduce some pointer manipulation by just using file_lock_core where we can and only translate to a file_lock when needed. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-33-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:14 -05:00
proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X Let's show locks which are associated with a file descriptor in its fdinfo file. Currently we don't have a reliable way to determine who holds a lock. We can find some information in /proc/locks, but PID which is reported there can be wrong. For example, a process takes a lock, then forks a child and dies. In this case /proc/locks contains the parent pid, which can be reused by another process. $ cat /proc/locks ... 6: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF ... $ ps -C rpcbind PID TTY TIME CMD 332 ? 00:00:00 rpcbind $ cat /proc/332/fdinfo/4 pos: 0 flags: 0100000 mnt_id: 22 lock: 1: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF $ ls -l /proc/332/fd/4 lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Mar 5 14:43 /proc/332/fd/4 -> /run/rpcbind.lock $ ls -l /proc/324/fd/ total 0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 0 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 1 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:49 2 -> /dev/pts/0 You can see that the process with the 324 pid doesn't hold the lock. This information is required for proper dumping and restoring file locks. Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 12:49:38 -07:00
fs/locks: print full locks information Commit fd7732e033e3 ("fs/locks: create a tree of dependent requests.") has put blocked locks into a tree. So, with a for loop, we can't check all locks information. To solve this problem, we should traverse the tree. Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2021-02-25 22:58:29 -05:00
proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X Let's show locks which are associated with a file descriptor in its fdinfo file. Currently we don't have a reliable way to determine who holds a lock. We can find some information in /proc/locks, but PID which is reported there can be wrong. For example, a process takes a lock, then forks a child and dies. In this case /proc/locks contains the parent pid, which can be reused by another process. $ cat /proc/locks ... 6: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF ... $ ps -C rpcbind PID TTY TIME CMD 332 ? 00:00:00 rpcbind $ cat /proc/332/fdinfo/4 pos: 0 flags: 0100000 mnt_id: 22 lock: 1: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF $ ls -l /proc/332/fd/4 lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Mar 5 14:43 /proc/332/fd/4 -> /run/rpcbind.lock $ ls -l /proc/324/fd/ total 0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 0 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 1 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:49 2 -> /dev/pts/0 You can see that the process with the 324 pid doesn't hold the lock. This information is required for proper dumping and restoring file locks. Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 12:49:38 -07:00
fs: remove locks_inode locks_inode was turned into a wrapper around file_inode in de2a4a501e71 (Partially revert "locks: fix file locking on overlayfs"). Finish replacing locks_inode invocations everywhere with file_inode. Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-25 08:48:37 -05:00
proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X Let's show locks which are associated with a file descriptor in its fdinfo file. Currently we don't have a reliable way to determine who holds a lock. We can find some information in /proc/locks, but PID which is reported there can be wrong. For example, a process takes a lock, then forks a child and dies. In this case /proc/locks contains the parent pid, which can be reused by another process. $ cat /proc/locks ... 6: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF ... $ ps -C rpcbind PID TTY TIME CMD 332 ? 00:00:00 rpcbind $ cat /proc/332/fdinfo/4 pos: 0 flags: 0100000 mnt_id: 22 lock: 1: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF $ ls -l /proc/332/fd/4 lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Mar 5 14:43 /proc/332/fd/4 -> /run/rpcbind.lock $ ls -l /proc/324/fd/ total 0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 0 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 1 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:49 2 -> /dev/pts/0 You can see that the process with the 324 pid doesn't hold the lock. This information is required for proper dumping and restoring file locks. Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 12:49:38 -07:00
filelock: add a new locks_inode_context accessor function There are a number of places in the kernel that are accessing the inode->i_flctx field without smp_load_acquire. This is required to ensure that the caller doesn't see a partially-initialized structure. Add a new accessor function for it to make this clear and convert all of the relevant accesses in locks.c to use it. Also, convert locks_free_lock_context to use the helper as well instead of just doing a "bare" assignment. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
2022-11-16 09:02:30 -05:00
proc: show locks in /proc/pid/fdinfo/X Let's show locks which are associated with a file descriptor in its fdinfo file. Currently we don't have a reliable way to determine who holds a lock. We can find some information in /proc/locks, but PID which is reported there can be wrong. For example, a process takes a lock, then forks a child and dies. In this case /proc/locks contains the parent pid, which can be reused by another process. $ cat /proc/locks ... 6: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF ... $ ps -C rpcbind PID TTY TIME CMD 332 ? 00:00:00 rpcbind $ cat /proc/332/fdinfo/4 pos: 0 flags: 0100000 mnt_id: 22 lock: 1: FLOCK ADVISORY WRITE 324 00:13:13431 0 EOF $ ls -l /proc/332/fd/4 lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Mar 5 14:43 /proc/332/fd/4 -> /run/rpcbind.lock $ ls -l /proc/324/fd/ total 0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 0 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:50 1 -> /dev/pts/0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 27 14:49 2 -> /dev/pts/0 You can see that the process with the 324 pid doesn't hold the lock. This information is required for proper dumping and restoring file locks. Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 12:49:38 -07:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
locks: add __acquires and __releases annotations to locks_start and locks_stop ...to make sparse happy. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:07 -05:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
procfs: fix numbering in /proc/locks The lock number in /proc/locks (first field) is implemented by a counter (private field of struct seq_file) which is incremented at each call of locks_show() and reset to 1 in locks_start() whatever the offset is. It should be reset according to the actual position in the list. Because of this, the numbering erratically restarts at 1 several times when reading a long /proc/locks file. Moreover, locks_show() can be called twice to print a single line thus skipping a number. The counter should be incremented in locks_next(). And last, pos is a loff_t, which can be bigger than a pointer, so we don't use the pointer as an integer anymore, and allocate a loff_t instead. Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-10-26 14:22:33 -07:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_global with a percpu-rwsem Replace the global part of the lglock with a percpu-rwsem. Since fcl_lock is a spinlock and itself nests under i_lock, which too is a spinlock we cannot acquire sleeping locks at locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks(). We can however wrap all fcl_lock acquisitions with percpu_down_read such that all invocations of locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks() have that read lock held. This allows us to replace the lg_global part of the lglock with the write side of the rwsem. In the absense of writers, percpu_{down,up}_read() are free of atomic instructions. This further avoids the very long preempt-disable regions caused by lglock on larger machines. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:33 +02:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
locks: add __acquires and __releases annotations to locks_start and locks_stop ...to make sparse happy. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
2014-02-03 12:13:07 -05:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make this locking as granular as possible. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:20 -04:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_global with a percpu-rwsem Replace the global part of the lglock with a percpu-rwsem. Since fcl_lock is a spinlock and itself nests under i_lock, which too is a spinlock we cannot acquire sleeping locks at locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks(). We can however wrap all fcl_lock acquisitions with percpu_down_read such that all invocations of locks_{insert,remove}_global_locks() have that read lock held. This allows us to replace the lg_global part of the lglock with the write side of the rwsem. In the absense of writers, percpu_{down,up}_read() are free of atomic instructions. This further avoids the very long preempt-disable regions caused by lglock on larger machines. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:33 +02:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
proc: move rest of /proc/locks to fs/locks.c Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
2008-10-04 22:34:18 +04:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
proc: move rest of /proc/locks to fs/locks.c Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
2008-10-04 22:34:18 +04:00
proc: introduce proc_create_seq_private Variant of proc_create_data that directly take a struct seq_operations argument + a private state size and drastically reduces the boilerplate code in the callers. All trivial callers converted over. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2018-04-24 17:05:17 +02:00
proc: move rest of /proc/locks to fs/locks.c Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
2008-10-04 22:34:18 +04:00
fs: make locks.c explicitly non-modular The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: config FILE_LOCKING bool "Enable POSIX file locking API" if EXPERT ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces of modularity so that when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only. Since module_init translates to device_initcall in the non-modular case, the init ordering gets bumped to one level earlier when we use the more appropriate fs_initcall here. However we've made similar changes before without any fallout and none is expected here either. Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
2015-12-17 14:11:03 -05:00
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers Currently /proc/locks is shown with a proc_read function, but its behavior is rather complex as it has to manually handle current offset and buffer length. On the other hand, files that show objects from lists can be easily reimplemented using the sequential files and the seq_list_XXX() helpers. This saves (as usually) 16 lines of code and more than 200 from the .text section. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: no externs in C] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fixes] Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-01 14:41:15 -07:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
Revert "memcg: enable accounting for file lock caches" This reverts commit 0f12156dff2862ac54235fc72703f18770769042. The kernel test robot reports a sizeable performance regression for this commit, and while it clearly does the rigth thing in theory, we'll need to look at just how to avoid or minimize the performance overhead of the memcg accounting. People already have suggestions on how to do that, but it's "future work". So revert it for now. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210907150757.GE17617@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-09-07 11:21:48 -07:00
locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2015-01-16 15:05:54 -05:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
Revert "memcg: enable accounting for file lock caches" This reverts commit 0f12156dff2862ac54235fc72703f18770769042. The kernel test robot reports a sizeable performance regression for this commit, and while it clearly does the rigth thing in theory, we'll need to look at just how to avoid or minimize the performance overhead of the memcg accounting. People already have suggestions on how to do that, but it's "future work". So revert it for now. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210907150757.GE17617@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-09-07 11:21:48 -07:00
fs: locks: remove init_once From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Remove SLAB initialization entirely, as suggested by Bruce and Linus. Allocate with __GFP_ZERO instead and only initialize list heads. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2011-07-07 13:06:09 +02:00
filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Add a new struct file_lease and move the lease-specific fields from struct file_lock to it. Convert the appropriate API calls to take struct file_lease instead, and convert the callers to use them. There is zero overlap between the lock manager operations for file locks and the ones for file leases, so split the lease-related operations off into a new lease_manager_operations struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-47-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 18:02:28 -05:00
fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing the hlist head and a spinlock. This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks. Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: der.herr@hofr.at Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-22 14:16:34 +02:00
locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever being traversed. Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn. This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an existing hole in the struct to avoid growing the size. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-21 08:58:22 -04:00
locks: create a new notifier chain for lease attempts With the new file caching infrastructure in nfsd, we can end up holding files open for an indefinite period of time, even when they are still idle. This may prevent the kernel from handing out leases on the file, which is something we don't want to block. Fix this by running a SRCU notifier call chain whenever on any lease attempt. nfsd can then purge the cache for that inode before returning. Since SRCU is only conditionally compiled in, we must only define the new chain if it's enabled, and users of the chain must ensure that SRCU is enabled. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2019-08-18 14:18:45 -04:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00