2023-07-22 13:47:56 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-03 03:02:42 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-22 13:47:56 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-27 16:42:03 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-22 13:47:56 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-27 16:42:03 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2023-07-22 13:47:56 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-27 16:42:03 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-22 13:47:56 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-02-26 08:41:48 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-27 16:42:03 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-22 13:47:56 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kbuild: deb-pkg: add pkg.linux-upstream.nokernelheaders build profile
Since commit f1d87664b82a ("kbuild: cross-compile linux-headers package
when possible"), 'make bindeb-pkg' may attempt to cross-compile the
linux-headers package, but it fails under certain circumstances.
For example, when CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT is enabled on Debian, the
following command fails:
$ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- bindeb-pkg
[ snip ]
Rebuilding host programs with aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc...
HOSTCC debian/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/usr/src/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/scripts/kallsyms
HOSTCC debian/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/usr/src/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/scripts/sorttable
HOSTCC debian/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/usr/src/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/scripts/asn1_compiler
HOSTCC debian/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/usr/src/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/scripts/sign-file
In file included from /usr/include/openssl/opensslv.h:109,
from debian/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/usr/src/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/scripts/sign-file.c:25:
/usr/include/openssl/macros.h:14:10: fatal error: openssl/opensslconf.h: No such file or directory
14 | #include <openssl/opensslconf.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
This commit adds a new profile, pkg.linux-upstream.nokernelheaders, to
guard the linux-headers package.
There are two options to fix the above issue.
Option 1: Set the pkg.linux-upstream.nokernelheaders build profile
$ DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=pkg.linux-upstream.nokernelheaders \
make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- bindeb-pkg
This skips the building of the linux-headers package.
Option 2: Install the necessary build dependencies
If you want to cross-compile the linux-headers package, you need to
install additional packages.
For example, on Debian, the packages necessary for cross-compiling it
to arm64 can be installed with the following commands:
# dpkg --add-architecture arm64
# apt update
# apt install gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu libssl-dev:arm64
Fixes: f1d87664b82a ("kbuild: cross-compile linux-headers package when possible")
Reported-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b3d4f49e-7ddb-29ba-0967-689232329b53@w6rz.net/
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
2024-10-23 03:16:58 +09:00
|
|
|
|
kbuild: cross-compile linux-headers package when possible
A long standing issue in the upstream kernel packaging is that the
linux-headers package is not cross-compiled.
For example, you can cross-build Debian packages for arm64 by running
the following command:
$ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- bindeb-pkg
However, the generated linux-headers-*_arm64.deb is useless because the
host programs in it were built for your build machine architecture
(likely x86), not arm64.
The Debian kernel maintains its own Makefiles to cross-compile host
tools without relying on Kbuild. [1]
Instead of adding such full custom Makefiles, this commit adds a small
piece of code to cross-compile host programs located under the scripts/
directory.
A straightforward solution is to pass HOSTCC=${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc, but it
would also cross-compile scripts/basic/fixdep, which needs to be native
to process the if_changed_dep macro. (This approach may work under some
circumstances; you can execute foreign architecture programs with the
help of binfmt_misc because Debian systems enable CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC,
but it would require installing QEMU and libc for that architecture.)
A trick is to use the external module build (KBUILD_EXTMOD=), which
does not rebuild scripts/basic/fixdep. ${CC} needs to be able to link
userspace programs (CONFIG_CC_CAN_LINK=y).
There are known limitations:
- GCC plugins
It would possible to rebuild GCC plugins for the target architecture
by passing HOSTCXX=${CROSS_COMPILE}g++ with necessary packages
installed, but gcc on the installed system emits
"cc1: error: incompatible gcc/plugin versions".
- objtool and resolve_btfids
These are built by the tools build system. They are not covered by
the current solution. The resulting linux-headers package is broken
if CONFIG_OBJTOOL or CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is enabled.
I only tested this with Debian, but it should work for other package
systems as well.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/blob/debian/6.9.9-1/debian/rules.real#L586
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
2024-07-27 16:42:04 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kbuild: deb-pkg: add pkg.linux-upstream.nokernelheaders build profile
Since commit f1d87664b82a ("kbuild: cross-compile linux-headers package
when possible"), 'make bindeb-pkg' may attempt to cross-compile the
linux-headers package, but it fails under certain circumstances.
For example, when CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT is enabled on Debian, the
following command fails:
$ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- bindeb-pkg
[ snip ]
Rebuilding host programs with aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc...
HOSTCC debian/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/usr/src/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/scripts/kallsyms
HOSTCC debian/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/usr/src/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/scripts/sorttable
HOSTCC debian/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/usr/src/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/scripts/asn1_compiler
HOSTCC debian/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/usr/src/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/scripts/sign-file
In file included from /usr/include/openssl/opensslv.h:109,
from debian/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/usr/src/linux-headers-6.12.0-rc4/scripts/sign-file.c:25:
/usr/include/openssl/macros.h:14:10: fatal error: openssl/opensslconf.h: No such file or directory
14 | #include <openssl/opensslconf.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
This commit adds a new profile, pkg.linux-upstream.nokernelheaders, to
guard the linux-headers package.
There are two options to fix the above issue.
Option 1: Set the pkg.linux-upstream.nokernelheaders build profile
$ DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=pkg.linux-upstream.nokernelheaders \
make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- bindeb-pkg
This skips the building of the linux-headers package.
Option 2: Install the necessary build dependencies
If you want to cross-compile the linux-headers package, you need to
install additional packages.
For example, on Debian, the packages necessary for cross-compiling it
to arm64 can be installed with the following commands:
# dpkg --add-architecture arm64
# apt update
# apt install gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu libssl-dev:arm64
Fixes: f1d87664b82a ("kbuild: cross-compile linux-headers package when possible")
Reported-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b3d4f49e-7ddb-29ba-0967-689232329b53@w6rz.net/
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
2024-10-23 03:16:58 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-10 19:06:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kbuild: cross-compile linux-headers package when possible
A long standing issue in the upstream kernel packaging is that the
linux-headers package is not cross-compiled.
For example, you can cross-build Debian packages for arm64 by running
the following command:
$ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- bindeb-pkg
However, the generated linux-headers-*_arm64.deb is useless because the
host programs in it were built for your build machine architecture
(likely x86), not arm64.
The Debian kernel maintains its own Makefiles to cross-compile host
tools without relying on Kbuild. [1]
Instead of adding such full custom Makefiles, this commit adds a small
piece of code to cross-compile host programs located under the scripts/
directory.
A straightforward solution is to pass HOSTCC=${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc, but it
would also cross-compile scripts/basic/fixdep, which needs to be native
to process the if_changed_dep macro. (This approach may work under some
circumstances; you can execute foreign architecture programs with the
help of binfmt_misc because Debian systems enable CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC,
but it would require installing QEMU and libc for that architecture.)
A trick is to use the external module build (KBUILD_EXTMOD=), which
does not rebuild scripts/basic/fixdep. ${CC} needs to be able to link
userspace programs (CONFIG_CC_CAN_LINK=y).
There are known limitations:
- GCC plugins
It would possible to rebuild GCC plugins for the target architecture
by passing HOSTCXX=${CROSS_COMPILE}g++ with necessary packages
installed, but gcc on the installed system emits
"cc1: error: incompatible gcc/plugin versions".
- objtool and resolve_btfids
These are built by the tools build system. They are not covered by
the current solution. The resulting linux-headers package is broken
if CONFIG_OBJTOOL or CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is enabled.
I only tested this with Debian, but it should work for other package
systems as well.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/blob/debian/6.9.9-1/debian/rules.real#L586
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
2024-07-27 16:42:04 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-10 19:06:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-13 15:26:44 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-11 08:43:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
kbuild: cross-compile linux-headers package when possible
A long standing issue in the upstream kernel packaging is that the
linux-headers package is not cross-compiled.
For example, you can cross-build Debian packages for arm64 by running
the following command:
$ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- bindeb-pkg
However, the generated linux-headers-*_arm64.deb is useless because the
host programs in it were built for your build machine architecture
(likely x86), not arm64.
The Debian kernel maintains its own Makefiles to cross-compile host
tools without relying on Kbuild. [1]
Instead of adding such full custom Makefiles, this commit adds a small
piece of code to cross-compile host programs located under the scripts/
directory.
A straightforward solution is to pass HOSTCC=${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc, but it
would also cross-compile scripts/basic/fixdep, which needs to be native
to process the if_changed_dep macro. (This approach may work under some
circumstances; you can execute foreign architecture programs with the
help of binfmt_misc because Debian systems enable CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC,
but it would require installing QEMU and libc for that architecture.)
A trick is to use the external module build (KBUILD_EXTMOD=), which
does not rebuild scripts/basic/fixdep. ${CC} needs to be able to link
userspace programs (CONFIG_CC_CAN_LINK=y).
There are known limitations:
- GCC plugins
It would possible to rebuild GCC plugins for the target architecture
by passing HOSTCXX=${CROSS_COMPILE}g++ with necessary packages
installed, but gcc on the installed system emits
"cc1: error: incompatible gcc/plugin versions".
- objtool and resolve_btfids
These are built by the tools build system. They are not covered by
the current solution. The resulting linux-headers package is broken
if CONFIG_OBJTOOL or CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is enabled.
I only tested this with Debian, but it should work for other package
systems as well.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/blob/debian/6.9.9-1/debian/rules.real#L586
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
2024-07-27 16:42:04 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-10 19:06:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
kbuild: cross-compile linux-headers package when possible
A long standing issue in the upstream kernel packaging is that the
linux-headers package is not cross-compiled.
For example, you can cross-build Debian packages for arm64 by running
the following command:
$ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- bindeb-pkg
However, the generated linux-headers-*_arm64.deb is useless because the
host programs in it were built for your build machine architecture
(likely x86), not arm64.
The Debian kernel maintains its own Makefiles to cross-compile host
tools without relying on Kbuild. [1]
Instead of adding such full custom Makefiles, this commit adds a small
piece of code to cross-compile host programs located under the scripts/
directory.
A straightforward solution is to pass HOSTCC=${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc, but it
would also cross-compile scripts/basic/fixdep, which needs to be native
to process the if_changed_dep macro. (This approach may work under some
circumstances; you can execute foreign architecture programs with the
help of binfmt_misc because Debian systems enable CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC,
but it would require installing QEMU and libc for that architecture.)
A trick is to use the external module build (KBUILD_EXTMOD=), which
does not rebuild scripts/basic/fixdep. ${CC} needs to be able to link
userspace programs (CONFIG_CC_CAN_LINK=y).
There are known limitations:
- GCC plugins
It would possible to rebuild GCC plugins for the target architecture
by passing HOSTCXX=${CROSS_COMPILE}g++ with necessary packages
installed, but gcc on the installed system emits
"cc1: error: incompatible gcc/plugin versions".
- objtool and resolve_btfids
These are built by the tools build system. They are not covered by
the current solution. The resulting linux-headers package is broken
if CONFIG_OBJTOOL or CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is enabled.
I only tested this with Debian, but it should work for other package
systems as well.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/blob/debian/6.9.9-1/debian/rules.real#L586
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
2024-07-27 16:42:04 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-27 16:42:03 +09:00
|
|
|
|
