kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-11-10 20:48:12 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst

632 lines
20 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

docs/doc-guide: Put meta title for kernel-doc HTML page kernel-doc.rst has two 1st level section titles of "Writing kernel-doc comments" and "Including kernel-doc comments". Therefore, rather than using the first one, put a meta title of "Kernel-doc comments" for the title of the resulting HTML page by using the "title" directive. Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/15636c13-7fa2-f973-6d3d-361222b839ef@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2022-06-09 22:28:40 +09:00
Documentation: kernel-doc: Promote two chapter headings to page title Promote "Writing kernel-doc comments" heading to page title, in accordance to kernel documentation guidelines. Also promote "Including kernel-doc comments" heading because both headings deserve their own chapters in PDF output. There is no differences in the resulting output except formatting semantics. Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Cc: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2022-03-29 11:52:34 +07:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
docs: add Rust documentation Most of the documentation for Rust is written within the source code itself, as it is idiomatic for Rust projects. This applies to both the shared infrastructure at `rust/` as well as any other Rust module (e.g. drivers) written across the kernel. However, these documents contain general information that does not fit particularly well in the source code, like the Quick Start guide. It also contains a few other small changes elsewhere in the documentation folder. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Co-developed-by: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.de> Signed-off-by: Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.de> Co-developed-by: Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com> Co-developed-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Co-developed-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Wu XiangCheng <bobwxc@email.cn> Signed-off-by: Wu XiangCheng <bobwxc@email.cn> Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Co-developed-by: Boris-Chengbiao Zhou <bobo1239@web.de> Signed-off-by: Boris-Chengbiao Zhou <bobo1239@web.de> Co-developed-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org> Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org> Co-developed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> Co-developed-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> Co-developed-by: Julian Merkle <me@jvmerkle.de> Signed-off-by: Julian Merkle <me@jvmerkle.de> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2021-07-03 17:23:16 +02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve private members description The private members section can now be moved to be together with the arguments section. Move it there and add an example about the usage of public: Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:03 -02:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: add comment about formatting verification Currently there is no automated checking for kernel-doc comments except running 'kernel-doc -v -none <filename>'. Mention the possibility to run kernel-doc to verify formatting of the comments in the kernel-doc guide. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-20 20:36:25 +02:00
docs: kdoc: move kernel-doc to tools/docs kernel-doc is the last documentation-related tool still living outside of the tools/docs directory; the time has come to move it over. [mchehab: fixed kdoc lib location] Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <311d17e403524349940a8b12de6b5e91e554b1f4.1768823489.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2026-01-19 13:05:01 +01:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: add comment about formatting verification Currently there is no automated checking for kernel-doc comments except running 'kernel-doc -v -none <filename>'. Mention the possibility to run kernel-doc to verify formatting of the comments in the kernel-doc guide. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-20 20:36:25 +02:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: specify that W=n does not check header files The documentation states that: make W=n can be used to verify the documentation format. This is true for .c files but not for headers [1]. Modify the documentation to specify that headers files are not covered by make W=n and that these need to be checked separately with scripts/kernel-doc. [1] commit 3a025e1d1c2e ("Add optional check for bad kernel-doc comments") Link: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/3a025e1d1c2e Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <20251225-doc-format-check-v1-1-dff637a4d275@kernel.org>
2025-12-25 13:47:37 +01:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: add comment about formatting verification Currently there is no automated checking for kernel-doc comments except running 'kernel-doc -v -none <filename>'. Mention the possibility to run kernel-doc to verify formatting of the comments in the kernel-doc guide. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-20 20:36:25 +02:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: specify that W=n does not check header files The documentation states that: make W=n can be used to verify the documentation format. This is true for .c files but not for headers [1]. Modify the documentation to specify that headers files are not covered by make W=n and that these need to be checked separately with scripts/kernel-doc. [1] commit 3a025e1d1c2e ("Add optional check for bad kernel-doc comments") Link: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/3a025e1d1c2e Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <20251225-doc-format-check-v1-1-dff637a4d275@kernel.org>
2025-12-25 13:47:37 +01:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve function documentation section Move its contents to happen earlier and improve the description of return values, adding a subsection to it. Most of the contents there came from kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:04 -02:00
Add documentation for Context section This section is mentioned in scripts/kernel-doc, so we should mention it in doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst. There are close to 500 comments using the Context section already, and almost 300 using a Locking section which fulfills much the same purpose (and should probably be converted for consistency). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:33 -08:00
doc-guide:kernel-doc.rst: Reference to foobar In the Function documentation Section of kernel-doc.rst there is a function_name() function as an example for how to make a comment about a function. But at the end of that example there is a reference to foobar instead of function_name. I think that should rather be function_name, because that was the placeholder the whole example was using. Signed-off-by: Joris Gutjahr <joris.gutjahr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-10-28 20:28:28 +01:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve function documentation section Move its contents to happen earlier and improve the description of return values, adding a subsection to it. Most of the contents there came from kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:04 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Add documentation for Context section This section is mentioned in scripts/kernel-doc, so we should mention it in doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst. There are close to 500 comments using the Context section already, and almost 300 using a Locking section which fulfills much the same purpose (and should probably be converted for consistency). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:33 -08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve function documentation section Move its contents to happen earlier and improve the description of return values, adding a subsection to it. Most of the contents there came from kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:04 -02:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: document Returns: spelling scripts/kernel-doc accepts "Return:" or "Returns:" for describing the return value of a function or function-like macro, so document this alternative spelling and use it in an example. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522224726.10498-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
2024-05-22 15:47:26 -07:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve function documentation section Move its contents to happen earlier and improve the description of return values, adding a subsection to it. Most of the contents there came from kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:04 -02:00
Documentation: doc-guide: use '%' constant indicator in Return: examples Use the 'constant' indicator '%' in the examples for the Return: values syntax. This can help encourage people to use it. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221121154358.36856ca6@gandalf.local.home/ Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230703232030.8223-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
2023-07-03 16:20:30 -07:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve function documentation section Move its contents to happen earlier and improve the description of return values, adding a subsection to it. Most of the contents there came from kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:04 -02:00
Documentation: doc-guide: use '%' constant indicator in Return: examples Use the 'constant' indicator '%' in the examples for the Return: values syntax. This can help encourage people to use it. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221121154358.36856ca6@gandalf.local.home/ Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230703232030.8223-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
2023-07-03 16:20:30 -07:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve function documentation section Move its contents to happen earlier and improve the description of return values, adding a subsection to it. Most of the contents there came from kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:04 -02:00
Minor fixes to kernel-doc.rst The author clearly meant to use the word 'which' here. Also replace some tabs with spaces which fixes the syntax highlighting in my editor. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:34 -08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve function documentation section Move its contents to happen earlier and improve the description of return values, adding a subsection to it. Most of the contents there came from kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:04 -02:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve structs chapter There is a mess on this chapter: it suggests that even enums and unions should be documented with "struct". That's not the way it should be ;-) Fix it and move it to happen earlier. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:05 -02:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: don't let automarkup mangle with consts This document contains several words that tricks automarkup. Ensure that all of them will be inside a ``const`` markup, avoiding automarkup to touch them. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <a6adfa3d775c1dccc9f80a7b82be003cbc0051d2.1765894964.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-12-16 15:26:15 +01:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve structs chapter There is a mess on this chapter: it suggests that even enums and unions should be documented with "struct". That's not the way it should be ;-) Fix it and move it to happen earlier. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:05 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve structs chapter There is a mess on this chapter: it suggests that even enums and unions should be documented with "struct". That's not the way it should be ;-) Fix it and move it to happen earlier. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:05 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: don't let automarkup mangle with consts This document contains several words that tricks automarkup. Ensure that all of them will be inside a ``const`` markup, avoiding automarkup to touch them. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <a6adfa3d775c1dccc9f80a7b82be003cbc0051d2.1765894964.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-12-16 15:26:15 +01:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve structs chapter There is a mess on this chapter: it suggests that even enums and unions should be documented with "struct". That's not the way it should be ;-) Fix it and move it to happen earlier. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:05 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve structs chapter There is a mess on this chapter: it suggests that even enums and unions should be documented with "struct". That's not the way it should be ;-) Fix it and move it to happen earlier. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:05 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: don't let automarkup mangle with consts This document contains several words that tricks automarkup. Ensure that all of them will be inside a ``const`` markup, avoiding automarkup to touch them. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <a6adfa3d775c1dccc9f80a7b82be003cbc0051d2.1765894964.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-12-16 15:26:15 +01:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: document private: scope propagation This was an undefined behavior, but at least one place used private: inside a nested struct meant to not be propagated outside it. Kernel-doc now defines how this is propagated. So, document that. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <bbe0ed698c21f3f930a561b885bc8a47824f7f1d.1773770483.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2026-03-17 19:09:39 +01:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
scripts: kernel-doc: parse next structs/unions There are several places within the Kernel tree with nested structs/unions, like this one: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char *name; enum { CGU_CLK_NONE = 0, CGU_CLK_EXT = BIT(0), CGU_CLK_PLL = BIT(1), CGU_CLK_GATE = BIT(2), CGU_CLK_MUX = BIT(3), CGU_CLK_MUX_GLITCHFREE = BIT(4), CGU_CLK_DIV = BIT(5), CGU_CLK_FIXDIV = BIT(6), CGU_CLK_CUSTOM = BIT(7), } type; int parents[4]; union { struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info pll; struct { struct ingenic_cgu_gate_info gate; struct ingenic_cgu_mux_info mux; struct ingenic_cgu_div_info div; struct ingenic_cgu_fixdiv_info fixdiv; }; struct ingenic_cgu_custom_info custom; }; }; Currently, such struct is documented as: **Definition** :: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char * name; }; **Members** ``name`` name of the clock With is obvioulsy wrong. It also generates an error: drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h:169: warning: No description found for parameter 'enum' However, there's nothing wrong with this kernel-doc markup: everything is documented there. It makes sense to document all fields there. So, add a way for the core to parse those structs. With this patch, all documented fields will properly generate documentation. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:13 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
scripts: kernel-doc: parse next structs/unions There are several places within the Kernel tree with nested structs/unions, like this one: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char *name; enum { CGU_CLK_NONE = 0, CGU_CLK_EXT = BIT(0), CGU_CLK_PLL = BIT(1), CGU_CLK_GATE = BIT(2), CGU_CLK_MUX = BIT(3), CGU_CLK_MUX_GLITCHFREE = BIT(4), CGU_CLK_DIV = BIT(5), CGU_CLK_FIXDIV = BIT(6), CGU_CLK_CUSTOM = BIT(7), } type; int parents[4]; union { struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info pll; struct { struct ingenic_cgu_gate_info gate; struct ingenic_cgu_mux_info mux; struct ingenic_cgu_div_info div; struct ingenic_cgu_fixdiv_info fixdiv; }; struct ingenic_cgu_custom_info custom; }; }; Currently, such struct is documented as: **Definition** :: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char * name; }; **Members** ``name`` name of the clock With is obvioulsy wrong. It also generates an error: drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h:169: warning: No description found for parameter 'enum' However, there's nothing wrong with this kernel-doc markup: everything is documented there. It makes sense to document all fields there. So, add a way for the core to parse those structs. With this patch, all documented fields will properly generate documentation. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:13 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: fix example for nested_foobar struct There's a missing */ at the end of Kernel docs example. Even adding it, it will still produce 3 warnings: example:33: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar' not described in 'nested_foobar' example:33: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st1' not described in 'nested_foobar' example:33: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st2' not described in 'nested_foobar' So, make the example more complete and add the missing end of comment there. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-16 11:48:15 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: fix example for nested_foobar struct There's a missing */ at the end of Kernel docs example. Even adding it, it will still produce 3 warnings: example:33: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar' not described in 'nested_foobar' example:33: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st1' not described in 'nested_foobar' example:33: warning: Function parameter or member 'bar.st2' not described in 'nested_foobar' So, make the example more complete and add the missing end of comment there. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-16 11:48:15 -02:00
scripts: kernel-doc: parse next structs/unions There are several places within the Kernel tree with nested structs/unions, like this one: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char *name; enum { CGU_CLK_NONE = 0, CGU_CLK_EXT = BIT(0), CGU_CLK_PLL = BIT(1), CGU_CLK_GATE = BIT(2), CGU_CLK_MUX = BIT(3), CGU_CLK_MUX_GLITCHFREE = BIT(4), CGU_CLK_DIV = BIT(5), CGU_CLK_FIXDIV = BIT(6), CGU_CLK_CUSTOM = BIT(7), } type; int parents[4]; union { struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info pll; struct { struct ingenic_cgu_gate_info gate; struct ingenic_cgu_mux_info mux; struct ingenic_cgu_div_info div; struct ingenic_cgu_fixdiv_info fixdiv; }; struct ingenic_cgu_custom_info custom; }; }; Currently, such struct is documented as: **Definition** :: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char * name; }; **Members** ``name`` name of the clock With is obvioulsy wrong. It also generates an error: drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h:169: warning: No description found for parameter 'enum' However, there's nothing wrong with this kernel-doc markup: everything is documented there. It makes sense to document all fields there. So, add a way for the core to parse those structs. With this patch, all documented fields will properly generate documentation. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:13 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: document private: scope propagation This was an undefined behavior, but at least one place used private: inside a nested struct meant to not be propagated outside it. Kernel-doc now defines how this is propagated. So, document that. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <bbe0ed698c21f3f930a561b885bc8a47824f7f1d.1773770483.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2026-03-17 19:09:39 +01:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
kernel-doc: Fix example in Nested structs/unions Add missing ';' as well as fixes the indent for the first struct. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201207210027.1049346-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-12-07 13:00:27 -08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: document private: scope propagation This was an undefined behavior, but at least one place used private: inside a nested struct meant to not be propagated outside it. Kernel-doc now defines how this is propagated. So, document that. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <bbe0ed698c21f3f930a561b885bc8a47824f7f1d.1773770483.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2026-03-17 19:09:39 +01:00
scripts: kernel-doc: parse next structs/unions There are several places within the Kernel tree with nested structs/unions, like this one: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char *name; enum { CGU_CLK_NONE = 0, CGU_CLK_EXT = BIT(0), CGU_CLK_PLL = BIT(1), CGU_CLK_GATE = BIT(2), CGU_CLK_MUX = BIT(3), CGU_CLK_MUX_GLITCHFREE = BIT(4), CGU_CLK_DIV = BIT(5), CGU_CLK_FIXDIV = BIT(6), CGU_CLK_CUSTOM = BIT(7), } type; int parents[4]; union { struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info pll; struct { struct ingenic_cgu_gate_info gate; struct ingenic_cgu_mux_info mux; struct ingenic_cgu_div_info div; struct ingenic_cgu_fixdiv_info fixdiv; }; struct ingenic_cgu_custom_info custom; }; }; Currently, such struct is documented as: **Definition** :: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char * name; }; **Members** ``name`` name of the clock With is obvioulsy wrong. It also generates an error: drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h:169: warning: No description found for parameter 'enum' However, there's nothing wrong with this kernel-doc markup: everything is documented there. It makes sense to document all fields there. So, add a way for the core to parse those structs. With this patch, all documented fields will properly generate documentation. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:13 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
kernel-doc: Fix example in Nested structs/unions Add missing ';' as well as fixes the indent for the first struct. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201207210027.1049346-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-12-07 13:00:27 -08:00
Minor fixes to kernel-doc.rst The author clearly meant to use the word 'which' here. Also replace some tabs with spaces which fixes the syntax highlighting in my editor. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:34 -08:00
scripts: kernel-doc: parse next structs/unions There are several places within the Kernel tree with nested structs/unions, like this one: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char *name; enum { CGU_CLK_NONE = 0, CGU_CLK_EXT = BIT(0), CGU_CLK_PLL = BIT(1), CGU_CLK_GATE = BIT(2), CGU_CLK_MUX = BIT(3), CGU_CLK_MUX_GLITCHFREE = BIT(4), CGU_CLK_DIV = BIT(5), CGU_CLK_FIXDIV = BIT(6), CGU_CLK_CUSTOM = BIT(7), } type; int parents[4]; union { struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info pll; struct { struct ingenic_cgu_gate_info gate; struct ingenic_cgu_mux_info mux; struct ingenic_cgu_div_info div; struct ingenic_cgu_fixdiv_info fixdiv; }; struct ingenic_cgu_custom_info custom; }; }; Currently, such struct is documented as: **Definition** :: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char * name; }; **Members** ``name`` name of the clock With is obvioulsy wrong. It also generates an error: drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h:169: warning: No description found for parameter 'enum' However, there's nothing wrong with this kernel-doc markup: everything is documented there. It makes sense to document all fields there. So, add a way for the core to parse those structs. With this patch, all documented fields will properly generate documentation. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:13 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Minor fixes to kernel-doc.rst The author clearly meant to use the word 'which' here. Also replace some tabs with spaces which fixes the syntax highlighting in my editor. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:34 -08:00
scripts: kernel-doc: parse next structs/unions There are several places within the Kernel tree with nested structs/unions, like this one: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char *name; enum { CGU_CLK_NONE = 0, CGU_CLK_EXT = BIT(0), CGU_CLK_PLL = BIT(1), CGU_CLK_GATE = BIT(2), CGU_CLK_MUX = BIT(3), CGU_CLK_MUX_GLITCHFREE = BIT(4), CGU_CLK_DIV = BIT(5), CGU_CLK_FIXDIV = BIT(6), CGU_CLK_CUSTOM = BIT(7), } type; int parents[4]; union { struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info pll; struct { struct ingenic_cgu_gate_info gate; struct ingenic_cgu_mux_info mux; struct ingenic_cgu_div_info div; struct ingenic_cgu_fixdiv_info fixdiv; }; struct ingenic_cgu_custom_info custom; }; }; Currently, such struct is documented as: **Definition** :: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char * name; }; **Members** ``name`` name of the clock With is obvioulsy wrong. It also generates an error: drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h:169: warning: No description found for parameter 'enum' However, there's nothing wrong with this kernel-doc markup: everything is documented there. It makes sense to document all fields there. So, add a way for the core to parse those structs. With this patch, all documented fields will properly generate documentation. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:13 -02:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Minor fixes to kernel-doc.rst The author clearly meant to use the word 'which' here. Also replace some tabs with spaces which fixes the syntax highlighting in my editor. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:34 -08:00
scripts: kernel-doc: parse next structs/unions There are several places within the Kernel tree with nested structs/unions, like this one: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char *name; enum { CGU_CLK_NONE = 0, CGU_CLK_EXT = BIT(0), CGU_CLK_PLL = BIT(1), CGU_CLK_GATE = BIT(2), CGU_CLK_MUX = BIT(3), CGU_CLK_MUX_GLITCHFREE = BIT(4), CGU_CLK_DIV = BIT(5), CGU_CLK_FIXDIV = BIT(6), CGU_CLK_CUSTOM = BIT(7), } type; int parents[4]; union { struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info pll; struct { struct ingenic_cgu_gate_info gate; struct ingenic_cgu_mux_info mux; struct ingenic_cgu_div_info div; struct ingenic_cgu_fixdiv_info fixdiv; }; struct ingenic_cgu_custom_info custom; }; }; Currently, such struct is documented as: **Definition** :: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char * name; }; **Members** ``name`` name of the clock With is obvioulsy wrong. It also generates an error: drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h:169: warning: No description found for parameter 'enum' However, there's nothing wrong with this kernel-doc markup: everything is documented there. It makes sense to document all fields there. So, add a way for the core to parse those structs. With this patch, all documented fields will properly generate documentation. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:13 -02:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: don't let automarkup mangle with consts This document contains several words that tricks automarkup. Ensure that all of them will be inside a ``const`` markup, avoiding automarkup to touch them. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <a6adfa3d775c1dccc9f80a7b82be003cbc0051d2.1765894964.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-12-16 15:26:15 +01:00
scripts: kernel-doc: parse next structs/unions There are several places within the Kernel tree with nested structs/unions, like this one: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char *name; enum { CGU_CLK_NONE = 0, CGU_CLK_EXT = BIT(0), CGU_CLK_PLL = BIT(1), CGU_CLK_GATE = BIT(2), CGU_CLK_MUX = BIT(3), CGU_CLK_MUX_GLITCHFREE = BIT(4), CGU_CLK_DIV = BIT(5), CGU_CLK_FIXDIV = BIT(6), CGU_CLK_CUSTOM = BIT(7), } type; int parents[4]; union { struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info pll; struct { struct ingenic_cgu_gate_info gate; struct ingenic_cgu_mux_info mux; struct ingenic_cgu_div_info div; struct ingenic_cgu_fixdiv_info fixdiv; }; struct ingenic_cgu_custom_info custom; }; }; Currently, such struct is documented as: **Definition** :: struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info { const char * name; }; **Members** ``name`` name of the clock With is obvioulsy wrong. It also generates an error: drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h:169: warning: No description found for parameter 'enum' However, there's nothing wrong with this kernel-doc markup: everything is documented there. It makes sense to document all fields there. So, add a way for the core to parse those structs. With this patch, all documented fields will properly generate documentation. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:13 -02:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: don't let automarkup mangle with consts This document contains several words that tricks automarkup. Ensure that all of them will be inside a ``const`` markup, avoiding automarkup to touch them. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <a6adfa3d775c1dccc9f80a7b82be003cbc0051d2.1765894964.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-12-16 15:26:15 +01:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve structs chapter There is a mess on this chapter: it suggests that even enums and unions should be documented with "struct". That's not the way it should be ;-) Fix it and move it to happen earlier. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:05 -02:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: move in-line section to be after nested struct We want to give some examples about how to do in-line comments for nested structs. So, move it to be after nested structs/unions chapter. The section content was not changed on this patch. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-16 11:48:17 -02:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: add examples about nested union/structs It helps to give some examples about how to use in-line comments also when nested union/structs are present. So add it. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-16 11:48:19 -02:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: move in-line section to be after nested struct We want to give some examples about how to do in-line comments for nested structs. So, move it to be after nested structs/unions chapter. The section content was not changed on this patch. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-16 11:48:17 -02:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve typedef documentation Add documentation about typedefs for function prototypes and move it to happen earlier. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:06 -02:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: don't let automarkup mangle with consts This document contains several words that tricks automarkup. Ensure that all of them will be inside a ``const`` markup, avoiding automarkup to touch them. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <a6adfa3d775c1dccc9f80a7b82be003cbc0051d2.1765894964.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-12-16 15:26:15 +01:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve typedef documentation Add documentation about typedefs for function prototypes and move it to happen earlier. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:06 -02:00
Add documentation for Context section This section is mentioned in scripts/kernel-doc, so we should mention it in doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst. There are close to 500 comments using the Context section already, and almost 300 using a Locking section which fulfills much the same purpose (and should probably be converted for consistency). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:33 -08:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: document Returns: spelling scripts/kernel-doc accepts "Return:" or "Returns:" for describing the return value of a function or function-like macro, so document this alternative spelling and use it in an example. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240522224726.10498-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
2024-05-22 15:47:26 -07:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: improve typedef documentation Add documentation about typedefs for function prototypes and move it to happen earlier. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:06 -02:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: document the new "var" kernel-doc markup Add a description containing the new syntax to document variables within kernel-doc markups. Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <aa0e3abcd6882a62f3ab9c34033c60fca1c44604.1765894964.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-12-16 15:26:16 +01:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: tell about object-like macros Since 2014 kernel-doc has supported describing object-like macros but it is not documented anywhere. I should have required some documentation for it when I merged the patch. :( There are currently only 3 uses of this (all in DRM headers, in include/drm/*.h). Add object-like macro kernel-doc documentation now so that more may know about it and use it. Fixes: cbb4d3e6510b ("scripts/kernel-doc: handle object-like macros") Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240107012400.32587-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
2024-01-06 17:24:00 -08:00
docs: kdoc: move kernel-doc to tools/docs kernel-doc is the last documentation-related tool still living outside of the tools/docs directory; the time has come to move it over. [mchehab: fixed kdoc lib location] Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <311d17e403524349940a8b12de6b5e91e554b1f4.1768823489.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2026-01-19 13:05:01 +01:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: tell about object-like macros Since 2014 kernel-doc has supported describing object-like macros but it is not documented anywhere. I should have required some documentation for it when I merged the patch. :( There are currently only 3 uses of this (all in DRM headers, in include/drm/*.h). Add object-like macro kernel-doc documentation now so that more may know about it and use it. Fixes: cbb4d3e6510b ("scripts/kernel-doc: handle object-like macros") Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240107012400.32587-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
2024-01-06 17:24:00 -08:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
doc-guide: kernel-doc: add %CONST examples Add examples of using '%' for formatting constant values to facilitate more usage of "%CONST" in kernel-doc. Suggested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <20251104050930.720711-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
2025-11-03 21:09:30 -08:00
kernel-doc: describe the ``literal`` syntax changeset b97f193abf83 ("scripts/kernel-doc: fix parser for apostrophes") added support for ``literal`` inside kernel-doc, in order to allow using the "%" symbol inside a literal block, as this is used at printk() description. Document it. Fixes: b97f193abf83 ("scripts/kernel-doc: fix parser for apostrophes") Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
2017-05-16 08:17:49 -03:00
Doc : doc-guide : Fix a typo fix the disjunction by replacing "of" with "or". Signed-off-by: Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-06-28 07:20:01 +01:00
kernel-doc: describe the ``literal`` syntax changeset b97f193abf83 ("scripts/kernel-doc: fix parser for apostrophes") added support for ``literal`` inside kernel-doc, in order to allow using the "%" symbol inside a literal block, as this is used at printk() description. Document it. Fixes: b97f193abf83 ("scripts/kernel-doc: fix parser for apostrophes") Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
2017-05-16 08:17:49 -03:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: don't let automarkup mangle with consts This document contains several words that tricks automarkup. Ensure that all of them will be inside a ``const`` markup, avoiding automarkup to touch them. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <a6adfa3d775c1dccc9f80a7b82be003cbc0051d2.1765894964.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-12-16 15:26:15 +01:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
kernel-doc: Update "cross-referencing from rST" section to use automarkup Update text and examples in the "Cross-referencing from reStructuredText" section to reflect that no additional syntax is needed anymore. Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@protonmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200903005747.3900333-3-nfraprado@protonmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-09-03 00:58:26 +00:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
kernel-doc: Update "cross-referencing from rST" section to use automarkup Update text and examples in the "Cross-referencing from reStructuredText" section to reflect that no additional syntax is needed anymore. Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@protonmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200903005747.3900333-3-nfraprado@protonmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-09-03 00:58:26 +00:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
kernel-doc: Update "cross-referencing from rST" section to use automarkup Update text and examples in the "Cross-referencing from reStructuredText" section to reflect that no additional syntax is needed anymore. Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@protonmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200903005747.3900333-3-nfraprado@protonmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-09-03 00:58:26 +00:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
kernel-doc: Update "cross-referencing from rST" section to use automarkup Update text and examples in the "Cross-referencing from reStructuredText" section to reflect that no additional syntax is needed anymore. Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@protonmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200903005747.3900333-3-nfraprado@protonmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2020-09-03 00:58:26 +00:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: document the new "var" kernel-doc markup Add a description containing the new syntax to document variables within kernel-doc markups. Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <aa0e3abcd6882a62f3ab9c34033c60fca1c44604.1765894964.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-12-16 15:26:16 +01:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: document the new "var" kernel-doc markup Add a description containing the new syntax to document variables within kernel-doc markups. Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <aa0e3abcd6882a62f3ab9c34033c60fca1c44604.1765894964.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-12-16 15:26:16 +01:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
Documentation: kernel-doc: Promote two chapter headings to page title Promote "Writing kernel-doc comments" heading to page title, in accordance to kernel documentation guidelines. Also promote "Including kernel-doc comments" heading because both headings deserve their own chapters in PDF output. There is no differences in the resulting output except formatting semantics. Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Cc: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2022-03-29 11:52:34 +07:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc Describe Sphinx, reStructuredText, the kernel-doc extension, the kernel-doc structured documentation comments, etc. The kernel-doc parts are based on kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt, by Tim <twaugh@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2016-06-23 15:36:04 +03:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers' The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before all documentation are updated. Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-10-31 21:52:45 +08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: document the new "var" kernel-doc markup Add a description containing the new syntax to document variables within kernel-doc markups. Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <aa0e3abcd6882a62f3ab9c34033c60fca1c44604.1765894964.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-12-16 15:26:16 +01:00
kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers' The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before all documentation are updated. Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-10-31 21:52:45 +08:00
docs: kerneldoc.py: add support for kerneldoc -nosymbol Currently, there's no way to exclude identifiers from a kernel-doc markup. Add support for it. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-09-29 11:32:18 +02:00
kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers' The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before all documentation are updated. Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-10-31 21:52:45 +08:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
docs: kdoc: move kernel-doc to tools/docs kernel-doc is the last documentation-related tool still living outside of the tools/docs directory; the time has come to move it over. [mchehab: fixed kdoc lib location] Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Message-ID: <311d17e403524349940a8b12de6b5e91e554b1f4.1768823489.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2026-01-19 13:05:01 +01:00
Restructure kernel-doc.rst I found the layout confusing with multiple introductions to what kernel-doc is and how to use it. I made the following changes: - Moved the 'Including kernel-doc comments' section to the end of the document -- we should explain what it *is* before we explain how to integrate it. - Moved the 'Recommendations' subsection to the top. We want people to know what to document before telling them how to do it. - Rewrite the 'Writing kernel-doc comments' section, integrating the 'Recommendations' subsection and a paragraph from 'How to format kernel-doc comments'. - Remove the paragraph about the kernel-doc script; we're supposed to be teaching people how to use punctuation to write pretty documentation, not documenting the build tooling. - Split the 'Parameters and member arguments' section into 'Function parameters' and 'Members'. Structure members are not commonly referred to as arguments. - Integrate the 'private:' and 'public:' tag descriptions into the 'Members' section. - Move the 'In-line member documentation comments' subsection up to be with the 'Members' section. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-02-13 13:15:37 -08:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: add documentation about man pages kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt has a chapter about man pages production. While we don't have a working "make manpages" target, add it. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:07 -02:00
docs: add support to build manpages from kerneldoc output Generating man files currently requires running a separate script. The target also doesn't appear at the docs Makefile. Add support for mandocs at the Makefile, adding the build logic inside sphinx-build-wrapper, updating documentation and dropping the ancillary script. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Message-ID: <3d248d724e7f3154f6e3a227e5923d7360201de9.1758196090.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2025-09-18 13:54:53 +02:00
docs: kernel-doc.rst: add documentation about man pages kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt has a chapter about man pages production. While we don't have a working "make manpages" target, add it. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2017-12-18 10:30:07 -02:00
docs: add support to build manpages from kerneldoc output Generating man files currently requires running a separate script. The target also doesn't appear at the docs Makefile. Add support for mandocs at the Makefile, adding the build logic inside sphinx-build-wrapper, updating documentation and dropping the ancillary script. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Message-ID: <3d248d724e7f3154f6e3a227e5923d7360201de9.1758196090.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2025-09-18 13:54:53 +02:00
docs: kernel-doc: update commands to generate man page (1) The command to generate man pages is truncated in the pdf version of the document. Reformat the command into multiple lines to prevent the truncation. (2) Older versions of git do not support all variants of pathspec syntax. Provide commands to generate man pages for various alternate syntax. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-02-01 13:54:39 -08:00
docs: add support to build manpages from kerneldoc output Generating man files currently requires running a separate script. The target also doesn't appear at the docs Makefile. Add support for mandocs at the Makefile, adding the build logic inside sphinx-build-wrapper, updating documentation and dropping the ancillary script. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Message-ID: <3d248d724e7f3154f6e3a227e5923d7360201de9.1758196090.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2025-09-18 13:54:53 +02:00
docs: kernel-doc: update commands to generate man page (1) The command to generate man pages is truncated in the pdf version of the document. Reformat the command into multiple lines to prevent the truncation. (2) Older versions of git do not support all variants of pathspec syntax. Provide commands to generate man pages for various alternate syntax. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-02-01 13:54:39 -08:00
docs: add support to build manpages from kerneldoc output Generating man files currently requires running a separate script. The target also doesn't appear at the docs Makefile. Add support for mandocs at the Makefile, adding the build logic inside sphinx-build-wrapper, updating documentation and dropping the ancillary script. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Message-ID: <3d248d724e7f3154f6e3a227e5923d7360201de9.1758196090.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2025-09-18 13:54:53 +02:00
docs: kernel-doc: update commands to generate man page (1) The command to generate man pages is truncated in the pdf version of the document. Reformat the command into multiple lines to prevent the truncation. (2) Older versions of git do not support all variants of pathspec syntax. Provide commands to generate man pages for various alternate syntax. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2019-02-01 13:54:39 -08:00
docs: add support to build manpages from kerneldoc output Generating man files currently requires running a separate script. The target also doesn't appear at the docs Makefile. Add support for mandocs at the Makefile, adding the build logic inside sphinx-build-wrapper, updating documentation and dropping the ancillary script. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Message-ID: <3d248d724e7f3154f6e3a227e5923d7360201de9.1758196090.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2025-09-18 13:54:53 +02:00