License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 15:07:57 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2010-04-06 15:14:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-22 17:21:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.
http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
The script does the followings.
* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used,
gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains
core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
doesn't seem to be any matching order.
* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
file.
The conversion was done in the following steps.
1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400
files.
2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion,
some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added
inclusions to around 150 files.
3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h
inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each
slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
necessary.
6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
* x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
* powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
* sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
* ia64 SMP allmodconfig
* s390 SMP allmodconfig
* alpha SMP allmodconfig
* um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 17:04:11 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2026-02-25 18:44:27 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-03 23:47:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-06 08:57:27 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-19 23:45:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-04-06 15:14:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 17:29:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-19 23:45:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2026-02-10 09:06:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-04-06 15:14:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-17 10:41:20 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-30 22:57:33 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-18 13:51:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-05 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-11 12:11:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-05 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-28 14:44:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:22:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:49 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:22:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-05 18:53:09 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:22:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:49 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-30 09:47:09 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-30 14:40:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-29 18:08:50 +11:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-30 09:47:09 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 16:27:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:22:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:21:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 16:27:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-10 11:40:13 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:22:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:22:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:21:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:21:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-23 15:16:52 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-09 12:59:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:21:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-09 12:59:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 17:17:44 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:21:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-05 18:53:09 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-21 17:29:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:21:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-07 08:44:50 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-09 12:59:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-20 17:08:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-17 10:01:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-17 14:32:12 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-04 19:00:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-04 19:00:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-04 19:00:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-03-18 16:57:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-04 19:00:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 10:50:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-17 10:01:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 06:33:03 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 06:33:03 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-22 20:28:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-13 09:40:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:41:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:41:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:41:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-08-08 14:29:38 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2025-05-23 08:57:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-08-08 14:29:38 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:41:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2026-08-17 15:29:17 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2026-02-10 09:06:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:40:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:40:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-09 16:38:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-17 10:01:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-17 16:14:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-17 10:01:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-17 16:14:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-21 11:26:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-17 16:14:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2025-05-23 08:57:52 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-08-08 14:29:38 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-17 10:14:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-17 16:14:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-21 11:26:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-17 16:14:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-17 16:14:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-17 16:14:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-17 16:14:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:40:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:40:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-17 16:14:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-17 10:14:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-17 10:01:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-17 14:32:12 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 10:50:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-01 09:36:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-11-07 10:44:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-01 09:36:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-07 10:13:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-17 16:14:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-11-22 15:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 06:33:03 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2023-11-07 10:44:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-26 06:33:03 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: avoid kernel BUG for encrypted inode with unaligned file size
The generic/397 test hits a BUG_ON for the case of encrypted inode with
unaligned file size (for example, 33K or 1K):
[ 877.737811] run fstests generic/397 at 2025-01-03 12:34:40
[ 877.875761] libceph: mon0 (2)127.0.0.1:40674 session established
[ 877.876130] libceph: client4614 fsid 19b90bca-f1ae-47a6-93dd-0b03ee637949
[ 877.991965] libceph: mon0 (2)127.0.0.1:40674 session established
[ 877.992334] libceph: client4617 fsid 19b90bca-f1ae-47a6-93dd-0b03ee637949
[ 878.017234] libceph: mon0 (2)127.0.0.1:40674 session established
[ 878.017594] libceph: client4620 fsid 19b90bca-f1ae-47a6-93dd-0b03ee637949
[ 878.031394] xfs_io (pid 18988) is setting deprecated v1 encryption policy; recommend upgrading to v2.
[ 878.054528] libceph: mon0 (2)127.0.0.1:40674 session established
[ 878.054892] libceph: client4623 fsid 19b90bca-f1ae-47a6-93dd-0b03ee637949
[ 878.070287] libceph: mon0 (2)127.0.0.1:40674 session established
[ 878.070704] libceph: client4626 fsid 19b90bca-f1ae-47a6-93dd-0b03ee637949
[ 878.264586] libceph: mon0 (2)127.0.0.1:40674 session established
[ 878.265258] libceph: client4629 fsid 19b90bca-f1ae-47a6-93dd-0b03ee637949
[ 878.374578] -----------[ cut here ]------------
[ 878.374586] kernel BUG at net/ceph/messenger.c:1070!
[ 878.375150] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[ 878.378145] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 4759 Comm: kworker/2:9 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5+ #1
[ 878.378969] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 878.380167] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn
[ 878.381639] RIP: 0010:ceph_msg_data_cursor_init+0x42/0x50
[ 878.382152] Code: 89 17 48 8b 46 70 55 48 89 47 08 c7 47 18 00 00 00 00 48 89 e5 e8 de cc ff ff 5d 31 c0 31 d2 31 f6 31 ff c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 0b <0f> 0b 0f 0b 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
[ 878.383928] RSP: 0018:ffffb4ffc7cbbd28 EFLAGS: 00010287
[ 878.384447] RAX: ffffffff82bb9ac0 RBX: ffff981390c2f1f8 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 878.385129] RDX: 0000000000009000 RSI: ffff981288232b58 RDI: ffff981390c2f378
[ 878.385839] RBP: ffffb4ffc7cbbe18 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 878.386539] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff981390c2f030
[ 878.387203] R13: ffff981288232b58 R14: 0000000000000029 R15: 0000000000000001
[ 878.387877] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9814b7900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 878.388663] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 878.389212] CR2: 00005e106a0554e0 CR3: 0000000112bf0001 CR4: 0000000000772ef0
[ 878.389921] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 878.390620] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 878.391307] PKRU: 55555554
[ 878.391567] Call Trace:
[ 878.391807] <TASK>
[ 878.392021] ? show_regs+0x71/0x90
[ 878.392391] ? die+0x38/0xa0
[ 878.392667] ? do_trap+0xdb/0x100
[ 878.392981] ? do_error_trap+0x75/0xb0
[ 878.393372] ? ceph_msg_data_cursor_init+0x42/0x50
[ 878.393842] ? exc_invalid_op+0x53/0x80
[ 878.394232] ? ceph_msg_data_cursor_init+0x42/0x50
[ 878.394694] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
[ 878.395099] ? ceph_msg_data_cursor_init+0x42/0x50
[ 878.395583] ? ceph_con_v2_try_read+0xd16/0x2220
[ 878.396027] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0xe/0x40
[ 878.396428] ? raw_spin_rq_unlock+0x10/0x40
[ 878.396842] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x97/0x310
[ 878.397338] ? __schedule+0x44b/0x16b0
[ 878.397738] ceph_con_workfn+0x326/0x750
[ 878.398121] process_one_work+0x188/0x3d0
[ 878.398522] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[ 878.398929] worker_thread+0x2b5/0x3c0
[ 878.399310] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[ 878.399727] kthread+0xe1/0x120
[ 878.400031] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 878.400431] ret_from_fork+0x43/0x70
[ 878.400771] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 878.401127] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[ 878.401543] </TASK>
[ 878.401760] Modules linked in: hctr2 nhpoly1305_avx2 nhpoly1305_sse2 nhpoly1305 chacha_generic chacha_x86_64 libchacha adiantum libpoly1305 essiv authenc mptcp_diag xsk_diag tcp_diag udp_diag raw_diag inet_diag unix_diag af_packet_diag netlink_diag intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common intel_uncore_frequency_common skx_edac_common nfit kvm_intel kvm crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul polyval_clmulni polyval_generic ghash_clmulni_intel sha256_ssse3 sha1_ssse3 aesni_intel joydev crypto_simd cryptd rapl input_leds psmouse sch_fq_codel serio_raw bochs i2c_piix4 floppy qemu_fw_cfg i2c_smbus mac_hid pata_acpi msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport efi_pstore ip_tables x_tables
[ 878.407319] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[ 878.407775] RIP: 0010:ceph_msg_data_cursor_init+0x42/0x50
[ 878.408317] Code: 89 17 48 8b 46 70 55 48 89 47 08 c7 47 18 00 00 00 00 48 89 e5 e8 de cc ff ff 5d 31 c0 31 d2 31 f6 31 ff c3 cc cc cc cc 0f 0b <0f> 0b 0f 0b 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
[ 878.410087] RSP: 0018:ffffb4ffc7cbbd28 EFLAGS: 00010287
[ 878.410609] RAX: ffffffff82bb9ac0 RBX: ffff981390c2f1f8 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 878.411318] RDX: 0000000000009000 RSI: ffff981288232b58 RDI: ffff981390c2f378
[ 878.412014] RBP: ffffb4ffc7cbbe18 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 878.412735] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff981390c2f030
[ 878.413438] R13: ffff981288232b58 R14: 0000000000000029 R15: 0000000000000001
[ 878.414121] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9814b7900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 878.414935] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 878.415516] CR2: 00005e106a0554e0 CR3: 0000000112bf0001 CR4: 0000000000772ef0
[ 878.416211] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 878.416907] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 878.417630] PKRU: 55555554
(gdb) l *ceph_msg_data_cursor_init+0x42
0xffffffff823b45a2 is in ceph_msg_data_cursor_init (net/ceph/messenger.c:1070).
1065
1066 void ceph_msg_data_cursor_init(struct ceph_msg_data_cursor *cursor,
1067 struct ceph_msg *msg, size_t length)
1068 {
1069 BUG_ON(!length);
1070 BUG_ON(length > msg->data_length);
1071 BUG_ON(!msg->num_data_items);
1072
1073 cursor->total_resid = length;
1074 cursor->data = msg->data;
The issue takes place because of this:
[ 202.628853] libceph: net/ceph/messenger_v2.c:2034 prepare_sparse_read_data(): msg->data_length 33792, msg->sparse_read_total 36864
1070 BUG_ON(length > msg->data_length);
The generic/397 test (xfstests) executes such steps:
(1) create encrypted files and directories;
(2) access the created files and folders with encryption key;
(3) access the created files and folders without encryption key.
The issue takes place in this portion of code:
if (IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)) {
struct page **pages;
size_t page_off;
err = iov_iter_get_pages_alloc2(&subreq->io_iter, &pages, len,
&page_off);
if (err < 0) {
doutc(cl, "%llx.%llx failed to allocate pages, %d\n",
ceph_vinop(inode), err);
goto out;
}
/* should always give us a page-aligned read */
WARN_ON_ONCE(page_off);
len = err;
err = 0;
osd_req_op_extent_osd_data_pages(req, 0, pages, len, 0, false,
false);
The reason of the issue is that subreq->io_iter.count keeps unaligned
value of length:
[ 347.751182] lib/iov_iter.c:1185 __iov_iter_get_pages_alloc(): maxsize 36864, maxpages 4294967295, start 18446659367320516064
[ 347.752808] lib/iov_iter.c:1196 __iov_iter_get_pages_alloc(): maxsize 33792, maxpages 4294967295, start 18446659367320516064
[ 347.754394] lib/iov_iter.c:1015 iter_folioq_get_pages(): maxsize 33792, maxpages 4294967295, extracted 0, _start_offset 18446659367320516064
This patch simply assigns the aligned value to subreq->io_iter.count
before calling iov_iter_get_pages_alloc2().
[ idryomov: tag the comment with FIXME to make it clear that it's only
a workaround for netfslib not coexisting with fscrypt nicely
(this is also noted in another pre-existing comment) ]
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: ee4cdf7ba857 ("netfs: Speed up buffered reading")
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2025-01-16 16:30:08 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-09 16:38:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-30 16:21:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:40:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:40:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-12-16 20:40:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
netfs: Fix handling of USE_PGPRIV2 and WRITE_TO_CACHE flags
The NETFS_RREQ_USE_PGPRIV2 and NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE flags aren't used
correctly. The problem is that we try to set them up in the request
initialisation, but we the cache may be in the process of setting up still,
and so the state may not be correct. Further, we secondarily sample the
cache state and make contradictory decisions later.
The issue arises because we set up the cache resources, which allows the
cache's ->prepare_read() to switch on NETFS_SREQ_COPY_TO_CACHE - which
triggers cache writing even if we didn't set the flags when allocating.
Fix this in the following way:
(1) Drop NETFS_ICTX_USE_PGPRIV2 and instead set NETFS_RREQ_USE_PGPRIV2 in
->init_request() rather than trying to juggle that in
netfs_alloc_request().
(2) Repurpose NETFS_RREQ_USE_PGPRIV2 to merely indicate that if caching is
to be done, then PG_private_2 is to be used rather than only setting
it if we decide to cache and then having netfs_rreq_unlock_folios()
set the non-PG_private_2 writeback-to-cache if it wasn't set.
(3) Split netfs_rreq_unlock_folios() into two functions, one of which
contains the deprecated code for using PG_private_2 to avoid
accidentally doing the writeback path - and always use it if
USE_PGPRIV2 is set.
(4) As NETFS_ICTX_USE_PGPRIV2 is removed, make netfs_write_begin() always
wait for PG_private_2. This function is deprecated and only used by
ceph anyway, and so label it so.
(5) Drop the NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE flag and use
fscache_operation_valid() on the cache_resources instead. This has
the advantage of picking up the result of netfs_begin_cache_read() and
fscache_begin_write_operation() - which are called after the object is
initialised and will wait for the cache to come to a usable state.
Just reverting ae678317b95e[1] isn't a sufficient fix, so this need to be
applied on top of that. Without this as well, things like:
rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected expedited stalls on CPUs/tasks: {
and:
WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 3621 at fs/ceph/caps.c:3386
may happen, along with some UAFs due to PG_private_2 not getting used to
wait on writeback completion.
Fixes: 2ff1e97587f4 ("netfs: Replace PG_fscache by setting folio->private and marking dirty")
Reported-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
cc: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
cc: Hristo Venev <hristo@venev.name>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3575457.1722355300@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1173209.1723152682@warthog.procyon.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-08-07 19:38:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
treewide: Replace kmalloc with kmalloc_obj for non-scalar types
This is the result of running the Coccinelle script from
scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci. The script is designed to
avoid scalar types (which need careful case-by-case checking), and
instead replace kmalloc-family calls that allocate struct or union
object instances:
Single allocations: kmalloc(sizeof(TYPE), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_obj(TYPE, ...)
Array allocations: kmalloc_array(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_objs(TYPE, COUNT, ...)
Flex array allocations: kmalloc(struct_size(PTR, FAM, COUNT), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_flex(*PTR, FAM, COUNT, ...)
(where TYPE may also be *VAR)
The resulting allocations no longer return "void *", instead returning
"TYPE *".
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
2026-02-20 23:49:23 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-10-02 21:05:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-02 21:05:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-25 11:19:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 14:43:23 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 14:43:23 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-10 19:55:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-09 14:43:23 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-29 22:37:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 21:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-25 11:19:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-02 00:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-17 10:14:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-05 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 10:10:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-07 08:44:51 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-30 17:01:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-19 10:07:03 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-07 08:44:51 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
netfs: Replace PG_fscache by setting folio->private and marking dirty
When dirty data is being written to the cache, setting/waiting on/clearing
the fscache flag is always done in tandem with setting/waiting on/clearing
the writeback flag. The netfslib buffered write routines wait on and set
both flags and the write request cleanup clears both flags, so the fscache
flag is almost superfluous.
The reason it isn't superfluous is because the fscache flag is also used to
indicate that data just read from the server is being written to the cache.
The flag is used to prevent a race involving overlapping direct-I/O writes
to the cache.
Change this to indicate that a page is in need of being copied to the cache
by placing a magic value in folio->private and marking the folios dirty.
Then when the writeback code sees a folio marked in this way, it only
writes it to the cache and not to the server.
If a folio that has this magic value set is modified, the value is just
replaced and the folio will then be uplodaded too.
With this, PG_fscache is no longer required by the netfslib core, 9p and
afs.
Ceph and nfs, however, still need to use the old PG_fscache-based tracking.
To deal with this, a flag, NETFS_ICTX_USE_PGPRIV2, now has to be set on the
flags in the netfs_inode struct for those filesystems. This reenables the
use of PG_fscache in that inode. 9p and afs use the netfslib write helpers
so get switched over; cifs, for the moment, does page-by-page manual access
to the cache, so doesn't use PG_fscache and is unaffected.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>
cc: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>
cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
cc: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
cc: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
cc: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
cc: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>
cc: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
cc: Bharath SM <bharathsm@microsoft.com>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
2024-03-19 10:00:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-07 08:44:51 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-30 17:01:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-07 08:44:51 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-01 16:53:58 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-02 10:50:48 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-30 09:47:09 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-02 10:50:48 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-02 10:50:48 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-01 16:53:58 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-02 10:50:48 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-24 08:44:16 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-31 21:52:10 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-01 16:53:58 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-30 09:47:09 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-07-02 12:35:52 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-14 14:37:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 10:50:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-31 22:01:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-14 14:37:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-14 14:37:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-07 08:44:51 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-01 09:36:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-20 20:22:02 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-23 17:48:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-02 10:50:48 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-31 22:01:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-23 17:18:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-31 22:01:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-23 17:48:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-31 22:01:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:21:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-23 17:48:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-31 16:48:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-23 17:48:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-15 16:57:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-04-06 15:14:15 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-22 14:39:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-18 13:51:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-24 17:35:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2026-06-04 02:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-14 14:37:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-24 17:35:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-07 08:44:51 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-30 17:01:40 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-07 08:44:51 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-14 14:37:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-03-04 17:02:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2026-06-04 02:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-14 14:37:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-14 14:37:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-10-04 14:52:09 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-30 16:21:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-14 14:37:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-22 20:28:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-13 09:40:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-02-10 09:06:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-14 14:37:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-13 17:29:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-06-04 02:19:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-23 17:48:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-13 17:29:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-14 13:39:19 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-13 17:29:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-23 15:16:52 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-31 22:01:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-15 16:57:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-22 14:39:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-15 16:57:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-28 16:07:24 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-03 01:28:58 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 10:50:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:49 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-13 09:40:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-04-04 08:39:46 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-04-04 08:39:46 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-14 13:39:19 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-04 08:39:46 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-05 18:53:09 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-05 18:53:09 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-13 09:40:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-25 09:31:25 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-18 13:51:57 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-22 14:39:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-19 00:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-23 15:16:52 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:49 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-19 00:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-11-17 16:14:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-08-08 20:56:47 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-13 09:40:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-02-10 09:06:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-03 01:28:58 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-30 11:03:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-04-03 01:28:58 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-09 16:38:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: fix write storm on fscrypted files
CephFS stores file data across multiple RADOS objects. An object is the
atomic unit of storage, so the writeback code must clean only folios
that belong to the same object with each OSD request.
CephFS also supports RAID0-style striping of file contents: if enabled,
each object stores multiple unbroken "stripe units" covering different
portions of the file; if disabled, a "stripe unit" is simply the whole
object. The stripe unit is (usually) reported as the inode's block size.
Though the writeback logic could, in principle, lock all dirty folios
belonging to the same object, its current design is to lock only a
single stripe unit at a time. Ever since this code was first written,
it has determined this size by checking the inode's block size.
However, the relatively-new fscrypt support needed to reduce the block
size for encrypted inodes to the crypto block size (see 'fixes' commit),
which causes an unnecessarily high number of write operations (~1024x as
many, with 4MiB objects) and correspondingly degraded performance.
Fix this (and clarify intent) by using i_layout.stripe_unit directly in
ceph_define_write_size() so that encrypted inodes are written back with
the same number of operations as if they were unencrypted.
This patch depends on the preceding commit ("ceph: do not propagate page
array emplacement errors as batch errors") for correctness. While it
applies cleanly on its own, applying it alone will introduce a
regression. This dependency is only relevant for kernels where
ce80b76dd327 ("ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method") has
been applied; stable kernels without that commit are unaffected.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 94af0470924c ("ceph: add some fscrypt guardrails")
Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2026-01-25 18:30:53 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-09-29 19:13:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
treewide: Replace kmalloc with kmalloc_obj for non-scalar types
This is the result of running the Coccinelle script from
scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci. The script is designed to
avoid scalar types (which need careful case-by-case checking), and
instead replace kmalloc-family calls that allocate struct or union
object instances:
Single allocations: kmalloc(sizeof(TYPE), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_obj(TYPE, ...)
Array allocations: kmalloc_array(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_objs(TYPE, COUNT, ...)
Flex array allocations: kmalloc(struct_size(PTR, FAM, COUNT), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_flex(*PTR, FAM, COUNT, ...)
(where TYPE may also be *VAR)
The resulting allocations no longer return "void *", instead returning
"TYPE *".
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
2026-02-20 23:49:23 -08:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-03-04 17:02:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-08-28 13:15:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-08-28 13:15:52 +02:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-25 18:30:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-01-25 18:30:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2026-05-04 18:54:45 +03:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-05-04 18:54:45 +03:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails
move_dirty_folio_in_page_array() may fail if the file is encrypted, the
dirty folio is not the first in the batch, and it fails to allocate a
bounce buffer to hold the ciphertext. When that happens,
ceph_process_folio_batch() simply redirties the folio and flushes the
current batch -- it can retry that folio in a future batch.
However, if this failed folio is not contiguous with the last folio that
did make it into the batch, then ceph_process_folio_batch() has already
incremented `ceph_wbc->num_ops`; because it doesn't follow through and
add the discontiguous folio to the array, ceph_submit_write() -- which
expects that `ceph_wbc->num_ops` accurately reflects the number of
contiguous ranges (and therefore the required number of "write extent"
ops) in the writeback -- will panic the kernel:
BUG_ON(ceph_wbc->op_idx + 1 != req->r_num_ops);
This issue can be reproduced on affected kernels by writing to
fscrypt-enabled CephFS file(s) with a 4KiB-written/4KiB-skipped/repeat
pattern (total filesize should not matter) and gradually increasing the
system's memory pressure until a bounce buffer allocation fails.
Fix this crash by decrementing `ceph_wbc->num_ops` back to the correct
value when move_dirty_folio_in_page_array() fails, but the folio already
started counting a new (i.e. still-empty) extent.
The defect corrected by this patch has existed since 2022 (see first
`Fixes:`), but another bug blocked multi-folio encrypted writeback until
recently (see second `Fixes:`). The second commit made it into 6.18.16,
6.19.6, and 7.0-rc1, unmasking the panic in those versions. This patch
therefore fixes a regression (panic) introduced by cac190c7674f.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: d55207717ded ("ceph: add encryption support to writepage and writepages")
Fixes: cac190c7674f ("ceph: fix write storm on fscrypted files")
Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2026-03-17 19:37:33 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: fix leaked inode reference on writeback abort at umount
ceph_dirty_folio() takes a wrbuffer claim on each newly dirtied folio: it
bumps i_wrbuffer_ref (taking an ihold() on the 0->1 transition) and
attaches the snap_context to folio->private. That claim is released only
by ceph_put_wrbuffer_cap_refs(), which for a submitted write runs from
writepages_finish().
In ceph_submit_write(), if ceph_inc_osd_stopping_blocker() fails -- which
happens during umount -- the request is aborted before submission: the
already-collected folios are only redirtied and unlocked, so
writepages_finish() never runs and the claim is leaked.
redirty_page_for_writepage() -> folio_redirty_for_writepage() ->
filemap_dirty_folio() sets PG_dirty directly and does not go through
->dirty_folio, so ceph_dirty_folio() is not re-entered to rebalance it.
Because every subsequent writeback also fails the osd_stopping_blocker,
i_wrbuffer_ref never returns to 0, the ihold() is never dropped, and the
inode cannot be evicted:
VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of ceph
kernel BUG at fs/super.c:650!
Release the orphaned claim in the abort path before redirtying, via
ceph_undo_wrbuffer_claim(): detach the snap_context, drop the wrbuffer
reference (letting i_wrbuffer_ref reach 0 and iput() the inode), and drop
the snap_context reference -- i.e. do what writepages_finish() would have
done for these never-submitted folios.
Only the locked_pages entries are undone; folios still in the fbatch were
never dirty-cleared by this call (folio_clear_dirty_for_io() is the
ownership-transfer point, and a successful move NULLs the fbatch slot), so
they hold no claim this call owns.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: fd7449d937e7 ("ceph: fix generic/421 test failure")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brown <matthew@bargrove.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubo.li@clyso.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2026-08-12 18:13:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: fix leaked inode reference on writeback abort at umount
ceph_dirty_folio() takes a wrbuffer claim on each newly dirtied folio: it
bumps i_wrbuffer_ref (taking an ihold() on the 0->1 transition) and
attaches the snap_context to folio->private. That claim is released only
by ceph_put_wrbuffer_cap_refs(), which for a submitted write runs from
writepages_finish().
In ceph_submit_write(), if ceph_inc_osd_stopping_blocker() fails -- which
happens during umount -- the request is aborted before submission: the
already-collected folios are only redirtied and unlocked, so
writepages_finish() never runs and the claim is leaked.
redirty_page_for_writepage() -> folio_redirty_for_writepage() ->
filemap_dirty_folio() sets PG_dirty directly and does not go through
->dirty_folio, so ceph_dirty_folio() is not re-entered to rebalance it.
Because every subsequent writeback also fails the osd_stopping_blocker,
i_wrbuffer_ref never returns to 0, the ihold() is never dropped, and the
inode cannot be evicted:
VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of ceph
kernel BUG at fs/super.c:650!
Release the orphaned claim in the abort path before redirtying, via
ceph_undo_wrbuffer_claim(): detach the snap_context, drop the wrbuffer
reference (letting i_wrbuffer_ref reach 0 and iput() the inode), and drop
the snap_context reference -- i.e. do what writepages_finish() would have
done for these never-submitted folios.
Only the locked_pages entries are undone; folios still in the fbatch were
never dirty-cleared by this call (folio_clear_dirty_for_io() is the
ownership-transfer point, and a successful move NULLs the fbatch slot), so
they hold no claim this call owns.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: fd7449d937e7 ("ceph: fix generic/421 test failure")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brown <matthew@bargrove.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubo.li@clyso.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2026-08-12 18:13:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 10:50:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-30 11:36:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-22 14:39:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:49 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:49 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-01 16:53:58 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-03-08 10:21:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-03-08 10:21:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: assert loop invariants in ceph_writepages_start()
If `locked_pages` is zero, the page array must not be allocated:
ceph_process_folio_batch() uses `locked_pages` to decide when to
allocate `pages`, and redundant allocations trigger
ceph_allocate_page_array()'s BUG_ON(), resulting in a worker oops (and
writeback stall) or even a kernel panic. Consequently, the main loop in
ceph_writepages_start() assumes that the lifetime of `pages` is confined
to a single iteration.
This expectation is currently not clear enough, as evidenced by the
recent patch which fixed an oops caused by `pages` persisting into
the next loop iteration:
- "ceph: do not propagate page array emplacement errors as batch errors"
Use an explicit BUG_ON() at the top of the loop to assert the loop's
preexisting expectation that `pages` is cleaned up by the previous
iteration. Because this is closely tied to `locked_pages`, also make it
the previous iteration's responsibility to guarantee its reset, and
verify with a second new BUG_ON() instead of handling (and masking)
failures to do so.
This patch does not change invariants, behavior, or failure modes.
The added BUG_ON() lines catch conditions that would already trigger oops,
but do so earlier for easier debugging and programmer clarity.
Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2026-01-25 18:30:55 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method
First step of ceph_writepages_start() logic is
of finding the dirty memory folios and processing it.
This patch introduces ceph_process_folio_batch()
method that moves this logic into dedicated method.
The ceph_writepages_start() has this logic:
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
<skipped>
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
The problem here that folio/page is locked here at first
and it is by set_page_writeback(page) later before
submitting the write request. The folio/page is unlocked
by writepages_finish() after finishing the write
request. It means that logic of checking folio_test_writeback()
and folio_wait_writeback() never works because page is locked
and it cannot be locked again until write request completion.
However, for majority of folios/pages the trylock_page()
is used. As a result, multiple threads can try to lock the same
folios/pages multiple times even if they are under writeback
already. It makes this logic more compute intensive than
it is necessary.
This patch changes this logic:
if (folio_test_writeback(folio) ||
folio_test_private_2(folio) /* [DEPRECATED] */) {
if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
doutc(cl, "%p under writeback\n", folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
continue;
}
doutc(cl, "waiting on writeback %p\n", folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
folio_wait_private_2(folio); /* [DEPRECATED] */
}
if (ceph_wbc.locked_pages == 0)
lock_page(page); /* first page */
else if (!trylock_page(page))
break;
This logic should exclude the ignoring of writeback
state of folios/pages.
Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-3-slava@dubeyko.com
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-04 16:02:47 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2024-10-02 05:01:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-01-25 18:30:54 -08:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: always call ceph_shift_unused_folios_left()
The function ceph_process_folio_batch() sets folio_batch entries to
NULL, which is an illegal state. Before folio_batch_release() crashes
due to this API violation, the function ceph_shift_unused_folios_left()
is supposed to remove those NULLs from the array.
However, since commit ce80b76dd327 ("ceph: introduce
ceph_process_folio_batch() method"), this shifting doesn't happen
anymore because the "for" loop got moved to ceph_process_folio_batch(),
and now the `i` variable that remains in ceph_writepages_start()
doesn't get incremented anymore, making the shifting effectively
unreachable much of the time.
Later, commit 1551ec61dc55 ("ceph: introduce ceph_submit_write()
method") added more preconditions for doing the shift, replacing the
`i` check (with something that is still just as broken):
- if ceph_process_folio_batch() fails, shifting never happens
- if ceph_move_dirty_page_in_page_array() was never called (because
ceph_process_folio_batch() has returned early for some of various
reasons), shifting never happens
- if `processed_in_fbatch` is zero (because ceph_process_folio_batch()
has returned early for some of the reasons mentioned above or
because ceph_move_dirty_page_in_page_array() has failed), shifting
never happens
Since those two commits, any problem in ceph_process_folio_batch()
could crash the kernel, e.g. this way:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000034
#PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI
CPU: 172 UID: 0 PID: 2342707 Comm: kworker/u778:8 Not tainted 6.15.10-cm4all1-es #714 NONE
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R7615/0G9DHV, BIOS 1.6.10 12/08/2023
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-ceph-1)
RIP: 0010:folios_put_refs+0x85/0x140
Code: 83 c5 01 39 e8 7e 76 48 63 c5 49 8b 5c c4 08 b8 01 00 00 00 4d 85 ed 74 05 41 8b 44 ad 00 48 8b 15 b0 >
RSP: 0018:ffffb880af8db778 EFLAGS: 00010207
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000003
RDX: ffffe377cc3b0000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffb880af8db8c0
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 000000000000007d R09: 000000000102b86f
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000000000000ac R12: ffffb880af8db8c0
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9bd262c97000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9c8efc303000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000034 CR3: 0000000160958004 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
<TASK>
ceph_writepages_start+0xeb9/0x1410
The crash can be reproduced easily by changing the
ceph_check_page_before_write() return value to `-E2BIG`.
(Interestingly, the crash happens only if `huge_zero_folio` has
already been allocated; without `huge_zero_folio`,
is_huge_zero_folio(NULL) returns true and folios_put_refs() skips NULL
entries instead of dereferencing them. That makes reproducing the bug
somewhat unreliable. See
https://lore.kernel.org/20250826231626.218675-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com
for a discussion of this detail.)
My suggestion is to move the ceph_shift_unused_folios_left() to right
after ceph_process_folio_batch() to ensure it always gets called to
fix up the illegal folio_batch state.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: ce80b76dd327 ("ceph: introduce ceph_process_folio_batch() method")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/ceph-devel/aK4v548CId5GIKG1@swift.blarg.de/
Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2025-08-27 20:17:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-04 13:14:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-09 16:38:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-09 16:38:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-07 16:00:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-01 16:53:58 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-04 13:14:33 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-01 17:03:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-01 17:03:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:49 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:46 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-04 16:02:48 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-02 10:50:48 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-31 22:01:38 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-31 13:39:13 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-31 13:39:13 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 13:56:54 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-05 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-11 12:11:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-05 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-05 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-11 12:11:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-05 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 11:02:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-07-16 09:36:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-22 14:31:43 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-15 14:24:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 11:02:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-07-16 09:36:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-23 17:07:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-09 15:04:01 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-05 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 11:02:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2024-07-15 14:24:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-05 10:40:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-15 14:24:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-05 10:40:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 11:02:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-30 14:40:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-07-16 09:36:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-10 15:45:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-07-16 09:36:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-23 17:07:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-22 12:03:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-11 09:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-14 07:15:38 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-05 22:20:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-11 09:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-05 22:20:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-30 11:32:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-11 09:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-05 22:20:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-11 09:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-18 09:03:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-29 08:49:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-29 22:37:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:22:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 20:21:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-20 17:08:30 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-09-23 07:50:08 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-24 14:56:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-10-04 19:04:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-31 13:39:13 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-05 12:19:35 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:59:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:36:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-07 10:13:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-15 11:15:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-24 14:56:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-15 11:15:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-25 10:51:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:36:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:36:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-22 16:38:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:36:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:36:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:36:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:36:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-05 01:00:29 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:36:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:36:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-22 16:38:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:36:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:59:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-24 14:56:41 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-01-23 17:07:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 17:26:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-31 13:39:13 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 17:26:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:59:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 17:26:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-08-01 10:06:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 17:26:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-05 12:19:35 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:59:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-06 08:57:27 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 11:02:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 19:09:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 14:59:49 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 11:02:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 19:09:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 14:59:49 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 19:09:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 14:59:49 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 19:09:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 14:59:49 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-17 18:51:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-28 14:59:49 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-09 11:02:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 17:26:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-10 14:39:26 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 17:26:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 18:40:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-08-01 10:06:40 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 17:26:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-23 21:32:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 21:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 21:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-06 16:28:49 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 21:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 21:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 21:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 21:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 21:41:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 10:50:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: fix possible deadlock when holding Fwb to get inline_data
1, mount with wsync.
2, create a file with O_RDWR, and the request was sent to mds.0:
ceph_atomic_open()-->
ceph_mdsc_do_request(openc)
finish_open(file, dentry, ceph_open)-->
ceph_open()-->
ceph_init_file()-->
ceph_init_file_info()-->
ceph_uninline_data()-->
{
...
if (inline_version == 1 || /* initial version, no data */
inline_version == CEPH_INLINE_NONE)
goto out_unlock;
...
}
The inline_version will be 1, which is the initial version for the
new create file. And here the ci->i_inline_version will keep with 1,
it's buggy.
3, buffer write to the file immediately:
ceph_write_iter()-->
ceph_get_caps(file, need=Fw, want=Fb, ...);
generic_perform_write()-->
a_ops->write_begin()-->
ceph_write_begin()-->
netfs_write_begin()-->
netfs_begin_read()-->
netfs_rreq_submit_slice()-->
netfs_read_from_server()-->
rreq->netfs_ops->issue_read()-->
ceph_netfs_issue_read()-->
{
...
if (ci->i_inline_version != CEPH_INLINE_NONE &&
ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline(subreq))
return;
...
}
ceph_put_cap_refs(ci, Fwb);
The ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline() will send a getattr(Fsr) request to
mds.1.
4, then the mds.1 will request the rd lock for CInode::filelock from
the auth mds.0, the mds.0 will do the CInode::filelock state transation
from excl --> sync, but it need to revoke the Fxwb caps back from the
clients.
While the kernel client has aleady held the Fwb caps and waiting for
the getattr(Fsr).
It's deadlock!
URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55377
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2022-04-25 16:08:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-01 09:36:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2025-09-25 18:42:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-07 17:21:21 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-07 17:21:21 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-02-01 09:36:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: fix possible deadlock when holding Fwb to get inline_data
1, mount with wsync.
2, create a file with O_RDWR, and the request was sent to mds.0:
ceph_atomic_open()-->
ceph_mdsc_do_request(openc)
finish_open(file, dentry, ceph_open)-->
ceph_open()-->
ceph_init_file()-->
ceph_init_file_info()-->
ceph_uninline_data()-->
{
...
if (inline_version == 1 || /* initial version, no data */
inline_version == CEPH_INLINE_NONE)
goto out_unlock;
...
}
The inline_version will be 1, which is the initial version for the
new create file. And here the ci->i_inline_version will keep with 1,
it's buggy.
3, buffer write to the file immediately:
ceph_write_iter()-->
ceph_get_caps(file, need=Fw, want=Fb, ...);
generic_perform_write()-->
a_ops->write_begin()-->
ceph_write_begin()-->
netfs_write_begin()-->
netfs_begin_read()-->
netfs_rreq_submit_slice()-->
netfs_read_from_server()-->
rreq->netfs_ops->issue_read()-->
ceph_netfs_issue_read()-->
{
...
if (ci->i_inline_version != CEPH_INLINE_NONE &&
ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline(subreq))
return;
...
}
ceph_put_cap_refs(ci, Fwb);
The ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline() will send a getattr(Fsr) request to
mds.1.
4, then the mds.1 will request the rd lock for CInode::filelock from
the auth mds.0, the mds.0 will do the CInode::filelock state transation
from excl --> sync, but it need to revoke the Fxwb caps back from the
clients.
While the kernel client has aleady held the Fwb caps and waiting for
the getattr(Fsr).
It's deadlock!
URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55377
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2022-04-25 16:08:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-09-25 18:42:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceph: fix possible deadlock when holding Fwb to get inline_data
1, mount with wsync.
2, create a file with O_RDWR, and the request was sent to mds.0:
ceph_atomic_open()-->
ceph_mdsc_do_request(openc)
finish_open(file, dentry, ceph_open)-->
ceph_open()-->
ceph_init_file()-->
ceph_init_file_info()-->
ceph_uninline_data()-->
{
...
if (inline_version == 1 || /* initial version, no data */
inline_version == CEPH_INLINE_NONE)
goto out_unlock;
...
}
The inline_version will be 1, which is the initial version for the
new create file. And here the ci->i_inline_version will keep with 1,
it's buggy.
3, buffer write to the file immediately:
ceph_write_iter()-->
ceph_get_caps(file, need=Fw, want=Fb, ...);
generic_perform_write()-->
a_ops->write_begin()-->
ceph_write_begin()-->
netfs_write_begin()-->
netfs_begin_read()-->
netfs_rreq_submit_slice()-->
netfs_read_from_server()-->
rreq->netfs_ops->issue_read()-->
ceph_netfs_issue_read()-->
{
...
if (ci->i_inline_version != CEPH_INLINE_NONE &&
ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline(subreq))
return;
...
}
ceph_put_cap_refs(ci, Fwb);
The ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline() will send a getattr(Fsr) request to
mds.1.
4, then the mds.1 will request the rd lock for CInode::filelock from
the auth mds.0, the mds.0 will do the CInode::filelock state transation
from excl --> sync, but it need to revoke the Fxwb caps back from the
clients.
While the kernel client has aleady held the Fwb caps and waiting for
the getattr(Fsr).
It's deadlock!
URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55377
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2022-04-25 16:08:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-11 18:48:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2025-09-25 18:42:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-04 14:52:09 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-30 16:21:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-11 18:48:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2025-09-25 18:42:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-02-16 15:00:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-13 11:25:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-13 11:25:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-13 11:25:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-13 11:25:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-10-04 14:52:09 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-30 16:21:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-19 23:45:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-22 20:28:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-13 09:40:53 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-19 23:45:01 -04:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: fix possible deadlock when holding Fwb to get inline_data
1, mount with wsync.
2, create a file with O_RDWR, and the request was sent to mds.0:
ceph_atomic_open()-->
ceph_mdsc_do_request(openc)
finish_open(file, dentry, ceph_open)-->
ceph_open()-->
ceph_init_file()-->
ceph_init_file_info()-->
ceph_uninline_data()-->
{
...
if (inline_version == 1 || /* initial version, no data */
inline_version == CEPH_INLINE_NONE)
goto out_unlock;
...
}
The inline_version will be 1, which is the initial version for the
new create file. And here the ci->i_inline_version will keep with 1,
it's buggy.
3, buffer write to the file immediately:
ceph_write_iter()-->
ceph_get_caps(file, need=Fw, want=Fb, ...);
generic_perform_write()-->
a_ops->write_begin()-->
ceph_write_begin()-->
netfs_write_begin()-->
netfs_begin_read()-->
netfs_rreq_submit_slice()-->
netfs_read_from_server()-->
rreq->netfs_ops->issue_read()-->
ceph_netfs_issue_read()-->
{
...
if (ci->i_inline_version != CEPH_INLINE_NONE &&
ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline(subreq))
return;
...
}
ceph_put_cap_refs(ci, Fwb);
The ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline() will send a getattr(Fsr) request to
mds.1.
4, then the mds.1 will request the rd lock for CInode::filelock from
the auth mds.0, the mds.0 will do the CInode::filelock state transation
from excl --> sync, but it need to revoke the Fxwb caps back from the
clients.
While the kernel client has aleady held the Fwb caps and waiting for
the getattr(Fsr).
It's deadlock!
URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55377
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2022-04-25 16:08:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ceph: fix possible deadlock when holding Fwb to get inline_data
1, mount with wsync.
2, create a file with O_RDWR, and the request was sent to mds.0:
ceph_atomic_open()-->
ceph_mdsc_do_request(openc)
finish_open(file, dentry, ceph_open)-->
ceph_open()-->
ceph_init_file()-->
ceph_init_file_info()-->
ceph_uninline_data()-->
{
...
if (inline_version == 1 || /* initial version, no data */
inline_version == CEPH_INLINE_NONE)
goto out_unlock;
...
}
The inline_version will be 1, which is the initial version for the
new create file. And here the ci->i_inline_version will keep with 1,
it's buggy.
3, buffer write to the file immediately:
ceph_write_iter()-->
ceph_get_caps(file, need=Fw, want=Fb, ...);
generic_perform_write()-->
a_ops->write_begin()-->
ceph_write_begin()-->
netfs_write_begin()-->
netfs_begin_read()-->
netfs_rreq_submit_slice()-->
netfs_read_from_server()-->
rreq->netfs_ops->issue_read()-->
ceph_netfs_issue_read()-->
{
...
if (ci->i_inline_version != CEPH_INLINE_NONE &&
ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline(subreq))
return;
...
}
ceph_put_cap_refs(ci, Fwb);
The ceph_netfs_issue_op_inline() will send a getattr(Fsr) request to
mds.1.
4, then the mds.1 will request the rd lock for CInode::filelock from
the auth mds.0, the mds.0 will do the CInode::filelock state transation
from excl --> sync, but it need to revoke the Fxwb caps back from the
clients.
While the kernel client has aleady held the Fwb caps and waiting for
the getattr(Fsr).
It's deadlock!
URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55377
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2022-04-25 16:08:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2025-09-25 18:42:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 23:48:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-14 22:38:29 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 15:39:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-28 14:28:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fs: replace mmap hook with .mmap_prepare for simple mappings
Since commit c84bf6dd2b83 ("mm: introduce new .mmap_prepare() file
callback"), the f_op->mmap() hook has been deprecated in favour of
f_op->mmap_prepare().
This callback is invoked in the mmap() logic far earlier, so error handling
can be performed more safely without complicated and bug-prone state
unwinding required should an error arise.
This hook also avoids passing a pointer to a not-yet-correctly-established
VMA avoiding any issues with referencing this data structure.
It rather provides a pointer to the new struct vm_area_desc descriptor type
which contains all required state and allows easy setting of required
parameters without any consideration needing to be paid to locking or
reference counts.
Note that nested filesystems like overlayfs are compatible with an
.mmap_prepare() callback since commit bb666b7c2707 ("mm: add mmap_prepare()
compatibility layer for nested file systems").
In this patch we apply this change to file systems with relatively simple
mmap() hook logic - exfat, ceph, f2fs, bcachefs, zonefs, btrfs, ocfs2,
orangefs, nilfs2, romfs, ramfs and aio.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/f528ac4f35b9378931bd800920fee53fc0c5c74d.1750099179.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Acked-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-06-16 20:33:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fs: replace mmap hook with .mmap_prepare for simple mappings
Since commit c84bf6dd2b83 ("mm: introduce new .mmap_prepare() file
callback"), the f_op->mmap() hook has been deprecated in favour of
f_op->mmap_prepare().
This callback is invoked in the mmap() logic far earlier, so error handling
can be performed more safely without complicated and bug-prone state
unwinding required should an error arise.
This hook also avoids passing a pointer to a not-yet-correctly-established
VMA avoiding any issues with referencing this data structure.
It rather provides a pointer to the new struct vm_area_desc descriptor type
which contains all required state and allows easy setting of required
parameters without any consideration needing to be paid to locking or
reference counts.
Note that nested filesystems like overlayfs are compatible with an
.mmap_prepare() callback since commit bb666b7c2707 ("mm: add mmap_prepare()
compatibility layer for nested file systems").
In this patch we apply this change to file systems with relatively simple
mmap() hook logic - exfat, ceph, f2fs, bcachefs, zonefs, btrfs, ocfs2,
orangefs, nilfs2, romfs, ramfs and aio.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/f528ac4f35b9378931bd800920fee53fc0c5c74d.1750099179.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Acked-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-06-16 20:33:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-04-29 11:53:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
fs: replace mmap hook with .mmap_prepare for simple mappings
Since commit c84bf6dd2b83 ("mm: introduce new .mmap_prepare() file
callback"), the f_op->mmap() hook has been deprecated in favour of
f_op->mmap_prepare().
This callback is invoked in the mmap() logic far earlier, so error handling
can be performed more safely without complicated and bug-prone state
unwinding required should an error arise.
This hook also avoids passing a pointer to a not-yet-correctly-established
VMA avoiding any issues with referencing this data structure.
It rather provides a pointer to the new struct vm_area_desc descriptor type
which contains all required state and allows easy setting of required
parameters without any consideration needing to be paid to locking or
reference counts.
Note that nested filesystems like overlayfs are compatible with an
.mmap_prepare() callback since commit bb666b7c2707 ("mm: add mmap_prepare()
compatibility layer for nested file systems").
In this patch we apply this change to file systems with relatively simple
mmap() hook logic - exfat, ceph, f2fs, bcachefs, zonefs, btrfs, ocfs2,
orangefs, nilfs2, romfs, ramfs and aio.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/f528ac4f35b9378931bd800920fee53fc0c5c74d.1750099179.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Acked-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-06-16 20:33:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-06 11:31:09 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 10:50:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-16 15:00:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:36:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-29 19:54:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:36:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-27 14:15:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-02-16 15:00:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:36:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-11 18:48:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-28 16:07:23 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-29 19:54:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:36:26 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-27 14:15:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-30 16:21:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-10-04 14:52:09 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-30 16:21:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-30 16:21:50 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-25 20:16:47 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-14 13:39:19 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-07-25 20:16:47 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-14 13:39:19 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-09-02 15:31:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-26 15:05:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-25 20:16:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-07-25 20:16:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-07-25 20:16:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-05-07 08:05:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-26 11:49:54 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 16:03:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-15 16:11:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 16:03:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 10:50:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-03 21:24:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 09:04:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-07 09:35:06 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-05-07 08:05:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-03 21:24:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2026-05-07 08:05:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-27 15:33:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|