linux/fs/ext4/crypto.c

248 lines
6.3 KiB

ext4: don't enable DAX on new encrypted files Currently, when a new encrypted regular file is created, the call to ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=true) in __ext4_new_inode() is made before EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT is set. As a result, it can set S_DAX if the filesystem is mounted with "-o dax=always". EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT then actually gets set a bit later in __ext4_new_inode(), when it calls fscrypt_set_context() which calls ext4_set_context(). ext4_set_context() sets EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT and calls ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=false) to set S_ENCRYPTED too. This was intended to clear S_DAX as well. However, this was broken by commit 043546e46dc7 ("fs/ext4: Only change S_DAX on inode load"). This causes data written to the file to bypass encryption, also causing xfstests failures such as generic/548 (when "-o dax=always" is used). Fix this by simplifying the flow by making __ext4_new_inode() set EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT earlier. This makes it take effect in ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=true), making S_DAX never be set. Similarly, make EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA never be set in the first place on new encrypted inodes. Then it doesn't need to be cleared. As a result of these simplifications, ext4_set_context() no longer needs to change inode flags or state when 'handle != NULL'. Remove that too. Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com> Reported-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260723085648.1500357-1-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com Fixes: 043546e46dc7 ("fs/ext4: Only change S_DAX on inode load") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260730175212.36923-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2026-07-30 10:52:12 -07:00
ext4: don't enable DAX on new encrypted files Currently, when a new encrypted regular file is created, the call to ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=true) in __ext4_new_inode() is made before EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT is set. As a result, it can set S_DAX if the filesystem is mounted with "-o dax=always". EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT then actually gets set a bit later in __ext4_new_inode(), when it calls fscrypt_set_context() which calls ext4_set_context(). ext4_set_context() sets EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT and calls ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=false) to set S_ENCRYPTED too. This was intended to clear S_DAX as well. However, this was broken by commit 043546e46dc7 ("fs/ext4: Only change S_DAX on inode load"). This causes data written to the file to bypass encryption, also causing xfstests failures such as generic/548 (when "-o dax=always" is used). Fix this by simplifying the flow by making __ext4_new_inode() set EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT earlier. This makes it take effect in ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=true), making S_DAX never be set. Similarly, make EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA never be set in the first place on new encrypted inodes. Then it doesn't need to be cleared. As a result of these simplifications, ext4_set_context() no longer needs to change inode flags or state when 'handle != NULL'. Remove that too. Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com> Reported-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260723085648.1500357-1-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com Fixes: 043546e46dc7 ("fs/ext4: Only change S_DAX on inode load") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260730175212.36923-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2026-07-30 10:52:12 -07:00
ext4: don't enable DAX on new encrypted files Currently, when a new encrypted regular file is created, the call to ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=true) in __ext4_new_inode() is made before EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT is set. As a result, it can set S_DAX if the filesystem is mounted with "-o dax=always". EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT then actually gets set a bit later in __ext4_new_inode(), when it calls fscrypt_set_context() which calls ext4_set_context(). ext4_set_context() sets EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT and calls ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=false) to set S_ENCRYPTED too. This was intended to clear S_DAX as well. However, this was broken by commit 043546e46dc7 ("fs/ext4: Only change S_DAX on inode load"). This causes data written to the file to bypass encryption, also causing xfstests failures such as generic/548 (when "-o dax=always" is used). Fix this by simplifying the flow by making __ext4_new_inode() set EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT earlier. This makes it take effect in ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=true), making S_DAX never be set. Similarly, make EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA never be set in the first place on new encrypted inodes. Then it doesn't need to be cleared. As a result of these simplifications, ext4_set_context() no longer needs to change inode flags or state when 'handle != NULL'. Remove that too. Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com> Reported-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260723085648.1500357-1-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com Fixes: 043546e46dc7 ("fs/ext4: Only change S_DAX on inode load") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260730175212.36923-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2026-07-30 10:52:12 -07:00
ext4: don't enable DAX on new encrypted files Currently, when a new encrypted regular file is created, the call to ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=true) in __ext4_new_inode() is made before EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT is set. As a result, it can set S_DAX if the filesystem is mounted with "-o dax=always". EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT then actually gets set a bit later in __ext4_new_inode(), when it calls fscrypt_set_context() which calls ext4_set_context(). ext4_set_context() sets EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT and calls ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=false) to set S_ENCRYPTED too. This was intended to clear S_DAX as well. However, this was broken by commit 043546e46dc7 ("fs/ext4: Only change S_DAX on inode load"). This causes data written to the file to bypass encryption, also causing xfstests failures such as generic/548 (when "-o dax=always" is used). Fix this by simplifying the flow by making __ext4_new_inode() set EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT earlier. This makes it take effect in ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, init=true), making S_DAX never be set. Similarly, make EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA never be set in the first place on new encrypted inodes. Then it doesn't need to be cleared. As a result of these simplifications, ext4_set_context() no longer needs to change inode flags or state when 'handle != NULL'. Remove that too. Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com> Reported-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260723085648.1500357-1-ojaswin@linux.ibm.com Fixes: 043546e46dc7 ("fs/ext4: Only change S_DAX on inode load") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260730175212.36923-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2026-07-30 10:52:12 -07:00
fscrypt: Always use blk-crypto for contents on block-based filesystems For encrypting and decrypting file contents on block-based filesystems (i.e., ext4 and f2fs, but not ceph and ubifs), always use blk-crypto instead of fs-layer crypto (direct use of crypto_skcipher). Since the blk-crypto API provides a fallback to CPU-based encryption, it's all that's needed on block-based filesystems. The support for two alternative block-based file contents encryption implementations, fs-layer and blk-crypto, existed mainly for historical reasons, as the fs-layer path came first. Some of it is also still needed for the non-block-based filesystems, but a lot of it isn't. Removing the duplicate fs-layer code paths greatly simplifies the code, most of which is done in later commits. Specific implementation details: - SB_INLINECRYPT now controls whether blk_crypto_config::allow_hw is set to true, instead of whether blk-crypto is used at all. The effect is that the semantics are preserved: the inlinecrypt mount option selects the use of inline encryption hardware instead of the CPU. - Set up a blk_crypto_key iff the file is a regular file on a block-based filesystem. To determine whether the filesystem is block-based, add a bit fscrypt_operations::is_block_based. - Remove fscrypt_select_encryption_impl(). Move the logging logic that was previously there into fscrypt_prepare_inline_crypt_key(). Note that blk_crypto_config_supported() is no longer needed. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260713023708.9245-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
2026-07-12 22:36:56 -04:00
fscrypt: support crypto data unit size less than filesystem block size Until now, fscrypt has always used the filesystem block size as the granularity of file contents encryption. Two scenarios have come up where a sub-block granularity of contents encryption would be useful: 1. Inline crypto hardware that only supports a crypto data unit size that is less than the filesystem block size. 2. Support for direct I/O at a granularity less than the filesystem block size, for example at the block device's logical block size in order to match the traditional direct I/O alignment requirement. (1) first came up with older eMMC inline crypto hardware that only supports a crypto data unit size of 512 bytes. That specific case ultimately went away because all systems with that hardware continued using out of tree code and never actually upgraded to the upstream inline crypto framework. But, now it's coming back in a new way: some current UFS controllers only support a data unit size of 4096 bytes, and there is a proposal to increase the filesystem block size to 16K. (2) was discussed as a "nice to have" feature, though not essential, when support for direct I/O on encrypted files was being upstreamed. Still, the fact that this feature has come up several times does suggest it would be wise to have available. Therefore, this patch implements it by using one of the reserved bytes in fscrypt_policy_v2 to allow users to select a sub-block data unit size. Supported data unit sizes are powers of 2 between 512 and the filesystem block size, inclusively. Support is implemented for both the FS-layer and inline crypto cases. This patch focuses on the basic support for sub-block data units. Some things are out of scope for this patch but may be addressed later: - Supporting sub-block data units in combination with FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64, in most cases. Unfortunately this combination usually causes data unit indices to exceed 32 bits, and thus fscrypt_supported_policy() correctly disallows it. The users who potentially need this combination are using f2fs. To support it, f2fs would need to provide an option to slightly reduce its max file size. - Supporting sub-block data units in combination with FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32. This has the same problem described above, but also it will need special code to make DUN wraparound still happen on a FS block boundary. - Supporting use case (2) mentioned above. The encrypted direct I/O code will need to stop requiring and assuming FS block alignment. This won't be hard, but it belongs in a separate patch. - Supporting this feature on filesystems other than ext4 and f2fs. (Filesystems declare support for it via their fscrypt_operations.) On UBIFS, sub-block data units don't make sense because UBIFS encrypts variable-length blocks as a result of compression. CephFS could support it, but a bit more work would be needed to make the fscrypt_*_block_inplace functions play nicely with sub-block data units. I don't think there's a use case for this on CephFS anyway. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230925055451.59499-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2023-09-24 22:54:51 -07:00