linux/fs/proc/Kconfig

128 lines
4.8 KiB

fs/proc/vmcore: introduce PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM to detect device RAM ranges in 2nd kernel s390 allocates+prepares the elfcore hdr in the dump (2nd) kernel, not in the crashed kernel. RAM provided by memory devices such as virtio-mem can only be detected using the device driver; when vmcore_init() is called, these device drivers are usually not loaded yet, or the devices did not get probed yet. Consequently, on s390 these RAM ranges will not be included in the crash dump, which makes the dump partially corrupt and is unfortunate. Instead of deferring the vmcore_init() call, to an (unclear?) later point, let's reuse the vmcore_cb infrastructure to obtain device RAM ranges as the device drivers probe the device and get access to this information. Then, we'll add these ranges to the vmcore, adding more PT_LOAD entries and updating the offsets+vmcore size. Use a separate Kconfig option to be set by an architecture to include this code only if the arch really needs it. Further, we'll make the config depend on the relevant drivers (i.e., virtio_mem) once they implement support (next). The alternative of having a PROVIDE_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM config option was dropped for now for simplicity. The current target use case is s390, which only creates an elf64 elfcore, so focusing on elf64 is sufficient. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20241204125444.1734652-9-david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2024-12-04 13:54:39 +01:00
fs/proc/vmcore: introduce PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM to detect device RAM ranges in 2nd kernel s390 allocates+prepares the elfcore hdr in the dump (2nd) kernel, not in the crashed kernel. RAM provided by memory devices such as virtio-mem can only be detected using the device driver; when vmcore_init() is called, these device drivers are usually not loaded yet, or the devices did not get probed yet. Consequently, on s390 these RAM ranges will not be included in the crash dump, which makes the dump partially corrupt and is unfortunate. Instead of deferring the vmcore_init() call, to an (unclear?) later point, let's reuse the vmcore_cb infrastructure to obtain device RAM ranges as the device drivers probe the device and get access to this information. Then, we'll add these ranges to the vmcore, adding more PT_LOAD entries and updating the offsets+vmcore size. Use a separate Kconfig option to be set by an architecture to include this code only if the arch really needs it. Further, we'll make the config depend on the relevant drivers (i.e., virtio_mem) once they implement support (next). The alternative of having a PROVIDE_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM config option was dropped for now for simplicity. The current target use case is s390, which only creates an elf64 elfcore, so focusing on elf64 is sufficient. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20241204125444.1734652-9-david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2024-12-04 13:54:39 +01:00
fs, proc: introduce CONFIG_PROC_CHILDREN Commit 818411616baf ("fs, proc: introduce /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children entry") introduced the children entry for checkpoint restore and the file is only available on kernels configured with CONFIG_EXPERT and CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE. This is available in most distributions (Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, CoreOS) because they usually enable CONFIG_EXPERT and CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE. But Arch does not enable CONFIG_EXPERT or CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE. However, the children proc file is useful outside of checkpoint restore. I would like to use it in rkt. The rkt process exec() another program it does not control, and that other program will fork()+exec() a child process. I would like to find the pid of the child process from an external tool without iterating in /proc over all processes to find which one has a parent pid equal to rkt. This commit introduces CONFIG_PROC_CHILDREN and makes CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE select it. This allows enabling /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children without needing to enable CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE and CONFIG_EXPERT. Alban tested that /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children is present when the kernel is configured with CONFIG_PROC_CHILDREN=y but without CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE Signed-off-by: Iago López Galeiras <iago@endocode.com> Tested-by: Alban Crequy <alban@endocode.com> Reviewed-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Djalal Harouni <djalal@endocode.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-06-25 15:00:57 -07:00
fs, proc: introduce CONFIG_PROC_CHILDREN Commit 818411616baf ("fs, proc: introduce /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children entry") introduced the children entry for checkpoint restore and the file is only available on kernels configured with CONFIG_EXPERT and CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE. This is available in most distributions (Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, CoreOS) because they usually enable CONFIG_EXPERT and CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE. But Arch does not enable CONFIG_EXPERT or CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE. However, the children proc file is useful outside of checkpoint restore. I would like to use it in rkt. The rkt process exec() another program it does not control, and that other program will fork()+exec() a child process. I would like to find the pid of the child process from an external tool without iterating in /proc over all processes to find which one has a parent pid equal to rkt. This commit introduces CONFIG_PROC_CHILDREN and makes CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE select it. This allows enabling /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children without needing to enable CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE and CONFIG_EXPERT. Alban tested that /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children is present when the kernel is configured with CONFIG_PROC_CHILDREN=y but without CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE Signed-off-by: Iago López Galeiras <iago@endocode.com> Tested-by: Alban Crequy <alban@endocode.com> Reviewed-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Djalal Harouni <djalal@endocode.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-06-25 15:00:57 -07:00