kernel/linux
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ synced 2026-11-10 20:48:12 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Packages Activity
linux/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c

923 lines
25 KiB
Raw Permalink Normal View History

kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort Add KUnit tests for the KUnit test abort mechanism (see preceding commit). Add tests both for general try catch mechanism as well as non-architecture specific mechanism. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:40 -07:00
kunit: Add APIs for managing devices Tests for drivers often require a struct device to pass to other functions. While it's possible to create these with root_device_register(), or to use something like a platform device, this is both a misuse of those APIs, and can be difficult to clean up after, for example, a failed assertion. Add some KUnit-specific functions for registering and unregistering a struct device: - kunit_device_register() - kunit_device_register_with_driver() - kunit_device_unregister() These helpers allocate a on a 'kunit' bus which will either probe the driver passed in (kunit_device_register_with_driver), or will create a stub driver (kunit_device_register) which is cleaned up on test shutdown. Devices are automatically unregistered on test shutdown, but can be manually unregistered earlier with kunit_device_unregister() in order to, for example, test device release code. Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 15:39:08 +08:00
kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort Add KUnit tests for the KUnit test abort mechanism (see preceding commit). Add tests both for general try catch mechanism as well as non-architecture specific mechanism. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:40 -07:00
kunit: add tests for using current KUnit test field Create test suite called "kunit_current" to add test coverage for the use of current->kunit_test, which returns the current KUnit test. Add two test cases: - kunit_current_test to test current->kunit_test and the method kunit_get_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test. - kunit_current_fail_test to test the method kunit_fail_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test. Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-04-03 20:19:30 +00:00
kunit: Add test for static stub __kunit_activate_static_stub() works effectively as kunit_deactivate_static_stub() if `replacement_addr` is NULL. Add a test case to catch the issue discovered in commit 772e50a76ee6 ("kunit: Fix wrong parameter to kunit_deactivate_static_stub()"). For running the test: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \ --arch=x86_64 \ kunit_stub Fixed change log: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250612084834.587576-1-tzungbi@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-06-12 08:48:34 +00:00
kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort Add KUnit tests for the KUnit test abort mechanism (see preceding commit). Add tests both for general try catch mechanism as well as non-architecture specific mechanism. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:40 -07:00
kunit: Add APIs for managing devices Tests for drivers often require a struct device to pass to other functions. While it's possible to create these with root_device_register(), or to use something like a platform device, this is both a misuse of those APIs, and can be difficult to clean up after, for example, a failed assertion. Add some KUnit-specific functions for registering and unregistering a struct device: - kunit_device_register() - kunit_device_register_with_driver() - kunit_device_unregister() These helpers allocate a on a 'kunit' bus which will either probe the driver passed in (kunit_device_register_with_driver), or will create a stub driver (kunit_device_register) which is cleaned up on test shutdown. Devices are automatically unregistered on test shutdown, but can be manually unregistered earlier with kunit_device_unregister() in order to, for example, test device release code. Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 15:39:08 +08:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: hide unexported try-catch interface in try-catch-impl.h Define function as static inline in try-catch-impl.h to allow it to be used in kunit itself and tests. Also remove unused kunit_generic_try_catch Co-developed-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-01-06 22:28:19 +00:00
kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort Add KUnit tests for the KUnit test abort mechanism (see preceding commit). Add tests both for general try catch mechanism as well as non-architecture specific mechanism. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:40 -07:00
kunit: Adjust kunit_test timeout based on test_{suite,case} speed Currently, the in-kernel kunit test case timeout is 300 seconds. (There is a separate timeout mechanism for the whole test execution in kunit.py, but that's unrelated.) However, tests marked 'slow' or 'very slow' may timeout, particularly on slower machines. Implement a multiplier to the test-case timeout, so that slower tests have longer to complete: - DEFAULT -> 1x default timeout - KUNIT_SPEED_SLOW -> 3x default timeout - KUNIT_SPEED_VERY_SLOW -> 12x default timeout A further change is planned to allow user configuration of the default/base timeout to allow people with faster or slower machines to adjust these to their use-cases. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250614084711.2654593-2-davidgow@google.com Signed-off-by: Ujwal Jain <ujwaljain@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-06-14 16:47:11 +08:00
kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort Add KUnit tests for the KUnit test abort mechanism (see preceding commit). Add tests both for general try catch mechanism as well as non-architecture specific mechanism. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:40 -07:00
kunit: Adjust kunit_test timeout based on test_{suite,case} speed Currently, the in-kernel kunit test case timeout is 300 seconds. (There is a separate timeout mechanism for the whole test execution in kunit.py, but that's unrelated.) However, tests marked 'slow' or 'very slow' may timeout, particularly on slower machines. Implement a multiplier to the test-case timeout, so that slower tests have longer to complete: - DEFAULT -> 1x default timeout - KUNIT_SPEED_SLOW -> 3x default timeout - KUNIT_SPEED_VERY_SLOW -> 12x default timeout A further change is planned to allow user configuration of the default/base timeout to allow people with faster or slower machines to adjust these to their use-cases. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250614084711.2654593-2-davidgow@google.com Signed-off-by: Ujwal Jain <ujwaljain@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-06-14 16:47:11 +08:00
kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort Add KUnit tests for the KUnit test abort mechanism (see preceding commit). Add tests both for general try catch mechanism as well as non-architecture specific mechanism. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:40 -07:00
kunit: test: add the concept of assertions Add support for assertions which are like expectations except the test terminates if the assertion is not satisfied. The idea with assertions is that you use them to state all the preconditions for your test. Logically speaking, these are the premises of the test case, so if a premise isn't true, there is no point in continuing the test case because there are no conclusions that can be drawn without the premises. Whereas, the expectation is the thing you are trying to prove. It is not used universally in x-unit style test frameworks, but I really like it as a convention. You could still express the idea of a premise using the above idiom, but I think KUNIT_ASSERT_* states the intended idea perfectly. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:41 -07:00
kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort Add KUnit tests for the KUnit test abort mechanism (see preceding commit). Add tests both for general try catch mechanism as well as non-architecture specific mechanism. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:40 -07:00
kunit: test: add the concept of assertions Add support for assertions which are like expectations except the test terminates if the assertion is not satisfied. The idea with assertions is that you use them to state all the preconditions for your test. Logically speaking, these are the premises of the test case, so if a premise isn't true, there is no point in continuing the test case because there are no conclusions that can be drawn without the premises. Whereas, the expectation is the thing you are trying to prove. It is not used universally in x-unit style test frameworks, but I really like it as a convention. You could still express the idea of a premise using the above idiom, but I think KUNIT_ASSERT_* states the intended idea perfectly. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:41 -07:00
kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort Add KUnit tests for the KUnit test abort mechanism (see preceding commit). Add tests both for general try catch mechanism as well as non-architecture specific mechanism. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:40 -07:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: test: Move fault tests behind KUNIT_FAULT_TEST Kconfig option The NULL dereference tests in kunit_fault deliberately trigger a kernel BUG(), and therefore print the associated stack trace, even when the test passes. This is both annoying (as it bloats the test output), and can confuse some test harnesses, which assume any BUG() is a failure. Allow these tests to be specifically disabled (without disabling all of KUnit's other tests), by placing them behind the CONFIG_KUNIT_FAULT_TEST Kconfig option. This is enabled by default, but can be set to 'n' to disable the test. An empty 'kunit_fault' suite is left behind, which will automatically be marked 'skipped'. As the fault tests already were disabled under UML (as they weren't compatible with its fault handling), we can simply adapt those conditions, and add a dependency on !UML for our new option. Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/928249cc-e027-4f7f-b43f-502f99a1ea63@roeck-us.net/ Fixes: 82b0beff3497 ("kunit: Add tests for fault") Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-23 17:08:06 +08:00
kunit: Add tests for fault Add a test case to check NULL pointer dereference and make sure it would result as a failed test. The full kunit_fault test suite is marked as skipped when run on UML because it would result to a kernel panic. Tested with: ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 kunit_fault ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 \ --cross_compile=aarch64-linux-gnu- kunit_fault Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408074625.65017-8-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-08 09:46:25 +02:00
kunit: Adjust kunit_test timeout based on test_{suite,case} speed Currently, the in-kernel kunit test case timeout is 300 seconds. (There is a separate timeout mechanism for the whole test execution in kunit.py, but that's unrelated.) However, tests marked 'slow' or 'very slow' may timeout, particularly on slower machines. Implement a multiplier to the test-case timeout, so that slower tests have longer to complete: - DEFAULT -> 1x default timeout - KUNIT_SPEED_SLOW -> 3x default timeout - KUNIT_SPEED_VERY_SLOW -> 12x default timeout A further change is planned to allow user configuration of the default/base timeout to allow people with faster or slower machines to adjust these to their use-cases. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250614084711.2654593-2-davidgow@google.com Signed-off-by: Ujwal Jain <ujwaljain@google.com> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-06-14 16:47:11 +08:00
kunit: Add tests for fault Add a test case to check NULL pointer dereference and make sure it would result as a failed test. The full kunit_fault test suite is marked as skipped when run on UML because it would result to a kernel panic. Tested with: ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 kunit_fault ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 \ --cross_compile=aarch64-linux-gnu- kunit_fault Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408074625.65017-8-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-08 09:46:25 +02:00
kunit: test: Move fault tests behind KUNIT_FAULT_TEST Kconfig option The NULL dereference tests in kunit_fault deliberately trigger a kernel BUG(), and therefore print the associated stack trace, even when the test passes. This is both annoying (as it bloats the test output), and can confuse some test harnesses, which assume any BUG() is a failure. Allow these tests to be specifically disabled (without disabling all of KUnit's other tests), by placing them behind the CONFIG_KUNIT_FAULT_TEST Kconfig option. This is enabled by default, but can be set to 'n' to disable the test. An empty 'kunit_fault' suite is left behind, which will automatically be marked 'skipped'. As the fault tests already were disabled under UML (as they weren't compatible with its fault handling), we can simply adapt those conditions, and add a dependency on !UML for our new option. Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/928249cc-e027-4f7f-b43f-502f99a1ea63@roeck-us.net/ Fixes: 82b0beff3497 ("kunit: Add tests for fault") Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-23 17:08:06 +08:00
kunit: Add tests for fault Add a test case to check NULL pointer dereference and make sure it would result as a failed test. The full kunit_fault test suite is marked as skipped when run on UML because it would result to a kernel panic. Tested with: ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 kunit_fault ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 \ --cross_compile=aarch64-linux-gnu- kunit_fault Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408074625.65017-8-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-08 09:46:25 +02:00
kunit: test: Move fault tests behind KUNIT_FAULT_TEST Kconfig option The NULL dereference tests in kunit_fault deliberately trigger a kernel BUG(), and therefore print the associated stack trace, even when the test passes. This is both annoying (as it bloats the test output), and can confuse some test harnesses, which assume any BUG() is a failure. Allow these tests to be specifically disabled (without disabling all of KUnit's other tests), by placing them behind the CONFIG_KUNIT_FAULT_TEST Kconfig option. This is enabled by default, but can be set to 'n' to disable the test. An empty 'kunit_fault' suite is left behind, which will automatically be marked 'skipped'. As the fault tests already were disabled under UML (as they weren't compatible with its fault handling), we can simply adapt those conditions, and add a dependency on !UML for our new option. Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/928249cc-e027-4f7f-b43f-502f99a1ea63@roeck-us.net/ Fixes: 82b0beff3497 ("kunit: Add tests for fault") Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-23 17:08:06 +08:00
kunit: Add tests for fault Add a test case to check NULL pointer dereference and make sure it would result as a failed test. The full kunit_fault test suite is marked as skipped when run on UML because it would result to a kernel panic. Tested with: ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 kunit_fault ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 \ --cross_compile=aarch64-linux-gnu- kunit_fault Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408074625.65017-8-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-08 09:46:25 +02:00
kunit: test: Move fault tests behind KUNIT_FAULT_TEST Kconfig option The NULL dereference tests in kunit_fault deliberately trigger a kernel BUG(), and therefore print the associated stack trace, even when the test passes. This is both annoying (as it bloats the test output), and can confuse some test harnesses, which assume any BUG() is a failure. Allow these tests to be specifically disabled (without disabling all of KUnit's other tests), by placing them behind the CONFIG_KUNIT_FAULT_TEST Kconfig option. This is enabled by default, but can be set to 'n' to disable the test. An empty 'kunit_fault' suite is left behind, which will automatically be marked 'skipped'. As the fault tests already were disabled under UML (as they weren't compatible with its fault handling), we can simply adapt those conditions, and add a dependency on !UML for our new option. Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/928249cc-e027-4f7f-b43f-502f99a1ea63@roeck-us.net/ Fixes: 82b0beff3497 ("kunit: Add tests for fault") Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-23 17:08:06 +08:00
kunit: Add tests for fault Add a test case to check NULL pointer dereference and make sure it would result as a failed test. The full kunit_fault test suite is marked as skipped when run on UML because it would result to a kernel panic. Tested with: ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 kunit_fault ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 \ --cross_compile=aarch64-linux-gnu- kunit_fault Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408074625.65017-8-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-08 09:46:25 +02:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: Add kunit_add_action() to defer a call until test exit Many uses of the KUnit resource system are intended to simply defer calling a function until the test exits (be it due to success or failure). The existing kunit_alloc_resource() function is often used for this, but was awkward to use (requiring passing NULL init functions, etc), and returned a resource without incrementing its reference count, which -- while okay for this use-case -- could cause problems in others. Instead, introduce a simple kunit_add_action() API: a simple function (returning nothing, accepting a single void* argument) can be scheduled to be called when the test exits. Deferred actions are called in the opposite order to that which they were registered. This mimics the devres API, devm_add_action(), and also provides kunit_remove_action(), to cancel a deferred action, and kunit_release_action() to trigger one early. This is implemented as a resource under the hood, so the ordering between resource cleanup and deferred functions is maintained. Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-05-25 12:21:28 +08:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display add debugfs support for displaying kunit test suite results; this is especially useful for module-loaded tests to allow disentangling of test result display from other dmesg events. debugfs support is provided if CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS=y. As well as printk()ing messages, we append them to a per-test log. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: make kunit_kfree() only work on pointers from kunit_malloc() and friends kunit_kfree() exists to clean up allocations from kunit_kmalloc() and friends early instead of waiting for this to happen automatically at the end of the test. But it can be used on *anything* registered with the kunit resource API. E.g. the last 2 statements are equivalent: struct kunit_resource *res = something(); kfree(res->data); kunit_put_resource(res); The problem is that there could be multiple resources that point to the same `data`. E.g. you can have a named resource acting as a pseudo-global variable in a test. If you point it to data allocated with kunit_kmalloc(), then calling `kunit_kfree(ptr)` has the chance to delete either the named resource or to kfree `ptr`. Which one it does depends on the order the resources are registered as kunit_kfree() will delete resources in LIFO order. So this patch restricts kunit_kfree() to only working on resources created by kunit_kmalloc(). Calling it is therefore guaranteed to free the memory, not do anything else. Note: kunit_resource_instance_match() wasn't used outside of KUnit, so it should be safe to remove from the public interface. It's also generally dangerous, as shown above, and shouldn't be used. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-22 17:15:32 +00:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: Make kunit_remove_resource() idempotent The kunit_remove_resource() function is used to unlink a resource from the list of resources in the test, making it no longer show up in kunit_find_resource(). However, this could lead to a race condition if two threads called kunit_remove_resource() on the same resource at the same time: the resource would be removed from the list twice (causing a crash at the second list_del()), and the refcount for the resource would be decremented twice (instead of once, for the reference held by the resource list). Fix both problems, the first by using list_del_init(), and the second by checking if the resource has already been removed using list_empty(), and only decrementing its refcount if it has not. Also add a KUnit test for the kunit_remove_resource() function which tests this behaviour. Reported-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-04-02 12:35:29 +08:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: add support for named resources The kunit resources API allows for custom initialization and cleanup code (init/fini); here a new resource add function sets the "struct kunit_resource" "name" field, and calls the standard add function. Having a simple way to name resources is useful in cases such as multithreaded tests where a set of resources are shared among threads; a pointer to the "struct kunit *" test state then is all that is needed to retrieve and use named resources. Support is provided to add, find and destroy named resources; the latter two are simply wrappers that use a "match-by-name" callback. If an attempt to add a resource with a name that already exists is made kunit_add_named_resource() will return -EEXIST. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:21 +01:00
kunit: Add kunit_add_action() to defer a call until test exit Many uses of the KUnit resource system are intended to simply defer calling a function until the test exits (be it due to success or failure). The existing kunit_alloc_resource() function is often used for this, but was awkward to use (requiring passing NULL init functions, etc), and returned a resource without incrementing its reference count, which -- while okay for this use-case -- could cause problems in others. Instead, introduce a simple kunit_add_action() API: a simple function (returning nothing, accepting a single void* argument) can be scheduled to be called when the test exits. Deferred actions are called in the opposite order to that which they were registered. This mimics the devres API, devm_add_action(), and also provides kunit_remove_action(), to cancel a deferred action, and kunit_release_action() to trigger one early. This is implemented as a resource under the hood, so the ordering between resource cleanup and deferred functions is maintained. Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-05-25 12:21:28 +08:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
Convert 'alloc_obj' family to use the new default GFP_KERNEL argument This was done entirely with mindless brute force, using git grep -l '\<k[vmz]*alloc_objs*(.*, GFP_KERNEL)' | xargs sed -i 's/\(alloc_objs*(.*\), GFP_KERNEL)/\1)/' to convert the new alloc_obj() users that had a simple GFP_KERNEL argument to just drop that argument. Note that due to the extreme simplicity of the scripting, any slightly more complex cases spread over multiple lines would not be triggered: they definitely exist, but this covers the vast bulk of the cases, and the resulting diff is also then easier to check automatically. For the same reason the 'flex' versions will be done as a separate conversion. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2026-02-21 16:37:42 -08:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display add debugfs support for displaying kunit test suite results; this is especially useful for module-loaded tests to allow disentangling of test result display from other dmesg events. debugfs support is provided if CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS=y. As well as printk()ing messages, we append them to a per-test log. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:07 +00:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: Make kunit_remove_resource() idempotent The kunit_remove_resource() function is used to unlink a resource from the list of resources in the test, making it no longer show up in kunit_find_resource(). However, this could lead to a race condition if two threads called kunit_remove_resource() on the same resource at the same time: the resource would be removed from the list twice (causing a crash at the second list_del()), and the refcount for the resource would be decremented twice (instead of once, for the reference held by the resource list). Fix both problems, the first by using list_del_init(), and the second by checking if the resource has already been removed using list_empty(), and only decrementing its refcount if it has not. Also add a KUnit test for the kunit_remove_resource() function which tests this behaviour. Reported-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-04-02 12:35:29 +08:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:20 +01:00
kunit: add support for named resources The kunit resources API allows for custom initialization and cleanup code (init/fini); here a new resource add function sets the "struct kunit_resource" "name" field, and calls the standard add function. Having a simple way to name resources is useful in cases such as multithreaded tests where a set of resources are shared among threads; a pointer to the "struct kunit *" test state then is all that is needed to retrieve and use named resources. Support is provided to add, find and destroy named resources; the latter two are simply wrappers that use a "match-by-name" callback. If an attempt to add a resource with a name that already exists is made kunit_add_named_resource() will return -EEXIST. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 22:46:21 +01:00
kunit: Add kunit_add_action() to defer a call until test exit Many uses of the KUnit resource system are intended to simply defer calling a function until the test exits (be it due to success or failure). The existing kunit_alloc_resource() function is often used for this, but was awkward to use (requiring passing NULL init functions, etc), and returned a resource without incrementing its reference count, which -- while okay for this use-case -- could cause problems in others. Instead, introduce a simple kunit_add_action() API: a simple function (returning nothing, accepting a single void* argument) can be scheduled to be called when the test exits. Deferred actions are called in the opposite order to that which they were registered. This mimics the devres API, devm_add_action(), and also provides kunit_remove_action(), to cancel a deferred action, and kunit_release_action() to trigger one early. This is implemented as a resource under the hood, so the ordering between resource cleanup and deferred functions is maintained. Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-05-25 12:21:28 +08:00
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources (struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed resources. Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-23 02:02:42 -07:00
kunit: add log test the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:08 +00:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: Add a macro to wrap a deferred action function KUnit's deferred action API accepts a void(*)(void *) function pointer which is called when the test is exited. However, we very frequently want to use existing functions which accept a single pointer, but which may not be of type void*. While this is probably dodgy enough to be on the wrong side of the C standard, it's been often used for similar callbacks, and gcc's -Wcast-function-type seems to ignore cases where the only difference is the type of the argument, assuming it's compatible (i.e., they're both pointers to data). However, clang 16 has introduced -Wcast-function-type-strict, which no longer permits any deviation in function pointer type. This seems to be because it'd break CFI, which validates the type of function calls. This rather ruins our attempts to cast functions to defer them, and leaves us with a few options. The one we've chosen is to implement a macro which will generate a wrapper function which accepts a void*, and casts the argument to the appropriate type. For example, if you were trying to wrap: void foo_close(struct foo *handle); you could use: KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(kunit_action_foo_close, foo_close, struct foo *); This would create a new kunit_action_foo_close() function, of type kunit_action_t, which could be passed into kunit_add_action() and similar functions. In addition to defining this macro, update KUnit and its tests to use it. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1750 Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-11-28 15:24:05 +08:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: add log test the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:08 +00:00
kunit: drop assumption in kunit-log-test about current suite This test assumes that the declared kunit_suite object is the exact one which is being executed, which KUnit will not guarantee [1]. Specifically, `suite->log` is not initialized until a suite object is executed. So if KUnit makes a copy of the suite and runs that instead, this test dereferences an invalid pointer and (hopefully) segfaults. N.B. since we no longer assume this, we can no longer verify that `suite->log` is *not* allocated during normal execution. An alternative to this patch that would allow us to test that would require exposing an API for the current test to get its current suite. Exposing that for one internal kunit test seems like overkill, and grants users more footguns (e.g. reusing a test case in multiple suites and changing behavior based on the suite name, dynamically modifying the setup/cleanup funcs, storing/reading stuff out of the suite->log, etc.). [1] In a subsequent patch, KUnit will allow running subsets of test cases within a suite by making a copy of the suite w/ the filtered test list. But there are other reasons KUnit might execute a copy, e.g. if it ever wants to support parallel execution of different suites, recovering from errors and restarting suites Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:47 -07:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: drop assumption in kunit-log-test about current suite This test assumes that the declared kunit_suite object is the exact one which is being executed, which KUnit will not guarantee [1]. Specifically, `suite->log` is not initialized until a suite object is executed. So if KUnit makes a copy of the suite and runs that instead, this test dereferences an invalid pointer and (hopefully) segfaults. N.B. since we no longer assume this, we can no longer verify that `suite->log` is *not* allocated during normal execution. An alternative to this patch that would allow us to test that would require exposing an API for the current test to get its current suite. Exposing that for one internal kunit test seems like overkill, and grants users more footguns (e.g. reusing a test case in multiple suites and changing behavior based on the suite name, dynamically modifying the setup/cleanup funcs, storing/reading stuff out of the suite->log, etc.). [1] In a subsequent patch, KUnit will allow running subsets of test cases within a suite by making a copy of the suite w/ the filtered test list. But there are other reasons KUnit might execute a copy, e.g. if it ever wants to support parallel execution of different suites, recovering from errors and restarting suites Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:47 -07:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: add log test the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:08 +00:00
kunit: drop assumption in kunit-log-test about current suite This test assumes that the declared kunit_suite object is the exact one which is being executed, which KUnit will not guarantee [1]. Specifically, `suite->log` is not initialized until a suite object is executed. So if KUnit makes a copy of the suite and runs that instead, this test dereferences an invalid pointer and (hopefully) segfaults. N.B. since we no longer assume this, we can no longer verify that `suite->log` is *not* allocated during normal execution. An alternative to this patch that would allow us to test that would require exposing an API for the current test to get its current suite. Exposing that for one internal kunit test seems like overkill, and grants users more footguns (e.g. reusing a test case in multiple suites and changing behavior based on the suite name, dynamically modifying the setup/cleanup funcs, storing/reading stuff out of the suite->log, etc.). [1] In a subsequent patch, KUnit will allow running subsets of test cases within a suite by making a copy of the suite w/ the filtered test list. But there are other reasons KUnit might execute a copy, e.g. if it ever wants to support parallel execution of different suites, recovering from errors and restarting suites Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-09-14 14:03:47 -07:00
kunit: add log test the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:08 +00:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: test: Avoid cast warning when adding kfree() as an action In kunit_log_test() pass the kfree_wrapper() function to kunit_add_action() instead of directly passing kfree(). This prevents a cast warning: lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:565:25: warning: cast from 'void (*)(const void *)' to 'kunit_action_t *' (aka 'void (*)(void *)') converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict] 564 full_log = string_stream_get_string(test->log); > 565 kunit_add_action(test, (kunit_action_t *)kfree, full_log); Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311070041.kWVYx7YP-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: 05e2006ce493 ("kunit: Use string_stream for test log") Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-11-06 17:25:57 +00:00
kunit: add log test the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:08 +00:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: add log test the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:08 +00:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: add log test the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:08 +00:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: add log test the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:08 +00:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: add log test the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:08 +00:00
kunit: use NULL macros Replace the NULL checks with the more specific and idiomatic NULL macros. Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-02-11 17:42:42 +01:00
kunit: add log test the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:08 +00:00
kunit: fix bug of extra newline characters in debugfs logs Fix bug of the extra newline characters in debugfs logs. When a line is added to debugfs with a newline character at the end, an extra line appears in the debugfs log. This is due to a discrepancy between how the lines are printed and how they are added to the logs. Remove this discrepancy by checking if a newline character is present before adding a newline character. This should closely match the printk behavior. Add kunit_log_newline_test to provide test coverage for this issue. (Also, move kunit_log_test above suite definition to remove the unnecessary declaration prior to the suite definition) As an example, say we add these two lines to the log: kunit_log(..., "KTAP version 1\n"); kunit_log(..., "1..1"); The debugfs log before this fix: KTAP version 1 1..1 The debugfs log after this fix: KTAP version 1 1..1 Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-03-08 20:39:52 +00:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: fix bug of extra newline characters in debugfs logs Fix bug of the extra newline characters in debugfs logs. When a line is added to debugfs with a newline character at the end, an extra line appears in the debugfs log. This is due to a discrepancy between how the lines are printed and how they are added to the logs. Remove this discrepancy by checking if a newline character is present before adding a newline character. This should closely match the printk behavior. Add kunit_log_newline_test to provide test coverage for this issue. (Also, move kunit_log_test above suite definition to remove the unnecessary declaration prior to the suite definition) As an example, say we add these two lines to the log: kunit_log(..., "KTAP version 1\n"); kunit_log(..., "1..1"); The debugfs log before this fix: KTAP version 1 1..1 The debugfs log after this fix: KTAP version 1 1..1 Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-03-08 20:39:52 +00:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: fix bug of extra newline characters in debugfs logs Fix bug of the extra newline characters in debugfs logs. When a line is added to debugfs with a newline character at the end, an extra line appears in the debugfs log. This is due to a discrepancy between how the lines are printed and how they are added to the logs. Remove this discrepancy by checking if a newline character is present before adding a newline character. This should closely match the printk behavior. Add kunit_log_newline_test to provide test coverage for this issue. (Also, move kunit_log_test above suite definition to remove the unnecessary declaration prior to the suite definition) As an example, say we add these two lines to the log: kunit_log(..., "KTAP version 1\n"); kunit_log(..., "1..1"); The debugfs log before this fix: KTAP version 1 1..1 The debugfs log after this fix: KTAP version 1 1..1 Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-03-08 20:39:52 +00:00
kunit: Use string_stream for test log Replace the fixed-size log buffer with a string_stream so that the log can grow as lines are added. The existing kunit log tests have been updated for using a string_stream as the log. No new test have been added because there are already tests for the underlying string_stream. As the log tests now depend on string_stream functions they cannot build when kunit-test is a module. They have been surrounded by a #if to replace them with skipping version when the test is build as a module. Though this isn't pretty, it avoids moving code to another file while that code is also being changed. Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-28 11:41:10 +01:00
kunit: fix bug of extra newline characters in debugfs logs Fix bug of the extra newline characters in debugfs logs. When a line is added to debugfs with a newline character at the end, an extra line appears in the debugfs log. This is due to a discrepancy between how the lines are printed and how they are added to the logs. Remove this discrepancy by checking if a newline character is present before adding a newline character. This should closely match the printk behavior. Add kunit_log_newline_test to provide test coverage for this issue. (Also, move kunit_log_test above suite definition to remove the unnecessary declaration prior to the suite definition) As an example, say we add these two lines to the log: kunit_log(..., "KTAP version 1\n"); kunit_log(..., "1..1"); The debugfs log before this fix: KTAP version 1 1..1 The debugfs log after this fix: KTAP version 1 1..1 Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-03-08 20:39:52 +00:00
kunit: Support skipped tests The kunit_mark_skipped() macro marks the current test as "skipped", with the provided reason. The kunit_skip() macro will mark the test as skipped, and abort the test. The TAP specification supports this "SKIP directive" as a comment after the "ok" / "not ok" for a test. See the "Directives" section of the TAP spec for details: https://testanything.org/tap-specification.html#directives The 'success' field for KUnit tests is replaced with a kunit_status enum, which can be SUCCESS, FAILURE, or SKIPPED, combined with a 'status_comment' containing information on why a test was skipped. A new 'kunit_status' test suite is added to test this. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-06-24 23:58:12 -07:00
kunit: add tests for using current KUnit test field Create test suite called "kunit_current" to add test coverage for the use of current->kunit_test, which returns the current KUnit test. Add two test cases: - kunit_current_test to test current->kunit_test and the method kunit_get_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test. - kunit_current_fail_test to test the method kunit_fail_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test. Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-04-03 20:19:30 +00:00
kunit: Add APIs for managing devices Tests for drivers often require a struct device to pass to other functions. While it's possible to create these with root_device_register(), or to use something like a platform device, this is both a misuse of those APIs, and can be difficult to clean up after, for example, a failed assertion. Add some KUnit-specific functions for registering and unregistering a struct device: - kunit_device_register() - kunit_device_register_with_driver() - kunit_device_unregister() These helpers allocate a on a 'kunit' bus which will either probe the driver passed in (kunit_device_register_with_driver), or will create a stub driver (kunit_device_register) which is cleaned up on test shutdown. Devices are automatically unregistered on test shutdown, but can be manually unregistered earlier with kunit_device_unregister() in order to, for example, test device release code. Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 15:39:08 +08:00
kunit: test_dev_action: Correctly cast 'priv' pointer to long* The previous implementation incorrectly assumed the original type of 'priv' was void**, leading to an unnecessary and misleading cast. Correct the cast of the 'priv' pointer in test_dev_action() to its actual type, long*, removing an unnecessary cast. As an additional benefit, this fixes an out-of-bounds CHERI fault on hardware with architectural capabilities. The original implementation tried to store a capability-sized pointer using the priv pointer. However, the priv pointer's capability only granted access to the memory region of its original long type, leading to a bounds violation since the size of a long is smaller than the size of a capability. This change ensures that the pointer usage respects the capabilities' bounds. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251017092814.80022-1-florian.schmaus@codasip.com Fixes: d03c720e03bd ("kunit: Add APIs for managing devices") Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Schmaus <florian.schmaus@codasip.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-10-17 11:28:14 +02:00
kunit: Add APIs for managing devices Tests for drivers often require a struct device to pass to other functions. While it's possible to create these with root_device_register(), or to use something like a platform device, this is both a misuse of those APIs, and can be difficult to clean up after, for example, a failed assertion. Add some KUnit-specific functions for registering and unregistering a struct device: - kunit_device_register() - kunit_device_register_with_driver() - kunit_device_unregister() These helpers allocate a on a 'kunit' bus which will either probe the driver passed in (kunit_device_register_with_driver), or will create a stub driver (kunit_device_register) which is cleaned up on test shutdown. Devices are automatically unregistered on test shutdown, but can be manually unregistered earlier with kunit_device_unregister() in order to, for example, test device release code. Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 15:39:08 +08:00
kunit: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() bug The kunit_device_register() function doesn't return NULL, it returns error pointers. Change the KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL() to check for ERR_OR_NULL(). Fixes: d03c720e03bd ("kunit: Add APIs for managing devices") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-01-10 21:55:22 +03:00
kunit: Add APIs for managing devices Tests for drivers often require a struct device to pass to other functions. While it's possible to create these with root_device_register(), or to use something like a platform device, this is both a misuse of those APIs, and can be difficult to clean up after, for example, a failed assertion. Add some KUnit-specific functions for registering and unregistering a struct device: - kunit_device_register() - kunit_device_register_with_driver() - kunit_device_unregister() These helpers allocate a on a 'kunit' bus which will either probe the driver passed in (kunit_device_register_with_driver), or will create a stub driver (kunit_device_register) which is cleaned up on test shutdown. Devices are automatically unregistered on test shutdown, but can be manually unregistered earlier with kunit_device_unregister() in order to, for example, test device release code. Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 15:39:08 +08:00
kunit: Fix potential null dereference in kunit_device_driver_test() kunit_kzalloc() may return a NULL pointer, dereferencing it without NULL check may lead to NULL dereference. Add a NULL check for test_state. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115054335.21673-1-zichenxie0106@gmail.com Fixes: d03c720e03bd ("kunit: Add APIs for managing devices") Signed-off-by: Zichen Xie <zichenxie0106@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-11-14 23:43:36 -06:00
kunit: Add APIs for managing devices Tests for drivers often require a struct device to pass to other functions. While it's possible to create these with root_device_register(), or to use something like a platform device, this is both a misuse of those APIs, and can be difficult to clean up after, for example, a failed assertion. Add some KUnit-specific functions for registering and unregistering a struct device: - kunit_device_register() - kunit_device_register_with_driver() - kunit_device_unregister() These helpers allocate a on a 'kunit' bus which will either probe the driver passed in (kunit_device_register_with_driver), or will create a stub driver (kunit_device_register) which is cleaned up on test shutdown. Devices are automatically unregistered on test shutdown, but can be manually unregistered earlier with kunit_device_unregister() in order to, for example, test device release code. Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-15 15:39:08 +08:00
kunit: add tests for using current KUnit test field Create test suite called "kunit_current" to add test coverage for the use of current->kunit_test, which returns the current KUnit test. Add two test cases: - kunit_current_test to test current->kunit_test and the method kunit_get_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test. - kunit_current_fail_test to test the method kunit_fail_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test. Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-04-03 20:19:30 +00:00
kunit: Add test for static stub __kunit_activate_static_stub() works effectively as kunit_deactivate_static_stub() if `replacement_addr` is NULL. Add a test case to catch the issue discovered in commit 772e50a76ee6 ("kunit: Fix wrong parameter to kunit_deactivate_static_stub()"). For running the test: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \ --arch=x86_64 \ kunit_stub Fixed change log: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250612084834.587576-1-tzungbi@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-06-12 08:48:34 +00:00
kunit: add log test the logging test ensures multiple strings logged appear in the log string associated with the test when CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is enabled. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-03-26 14:25:08 +00:00
kunit: add tests for using current KUnit test field Create test suite called "kunit_current" to add test coverage for the use of current->kunit_test, which returns the current KUnit test. Add two test cases: - kunit_current_test to test current->kunit_test and the method kunit_get_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test. - kunit_current_fail_test to test the method kunit_fail_current_test(), which utilizes current->kunit_test. Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-04-03 20:19:30 +00:00
kunit: Add tests for fault Add a test case to check NULL pointer dereference and make sure it would result as a failed test. The full kunit_fault test suite is marked as skipped when run on UML because it would result to a kernel panic. Tested with: ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 kunit_fault ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 \ --cross_compile=aarch64-linux-gnu- kunit_fault Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408074625.65017-8-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-08 09:46:25 +02:00
kunit: Add test for static stub __kunit_activate_static_stub() works effectively as kunit_deactivate_static_stub() if `replacement_addr` is NULL. Add a test case to catch the issue discovered in commit 772e50a76ee6 ("kunit: Fix wrong parameter to kunit_deactivate_static_stub()"). For running the test: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \ --arch=x86_64 \ kunit_stub Fixed change log: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250612084834.587576-1-tzungbi@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-06-12 08:48:34 +00:00
kunit: allow kunit tests to be loaded as a module As tests are added to kunit, it will become less feasible to execute all built tests together. By supporting modular tests we provide a simple way to do selective execution on a running system; specifying CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m ...means we can simply "insmod example-test.ko" to run the tests. To achieve this we need to do the following: o export the required symbols in kunit o string-stream tests utilize non-exported symbols so for now we skip building them when CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=m. o drivers/base/power/qos-test.c contains a few unexported interface references, namely freq_qos_read_value() and freq_constraints_init(). Both of these could be potentially defined as static inline functions in include/linux/pm_qos.h, but for now we simply avoid supporting module build for that test suite. o support a new way of declaring test suites. Because a module cannot do multiple late_initcall()s, we provide a kunit_test_suites() macro to declare multiple suites within the same module at once. o some test module names would have been too general ("test-test" and "example-test" for kunit tests, "inode-test" for ext4 tests); rename these as appropriate ("kunit-test", "kunit-example-test" and "ext4-inode-test" respectively). Also define kunit_test_suite() via kunit_test_suites() as callers in other trees may need the old definition. Co-developed-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> # for ext4 bits Acked-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> # For list-test Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-01-06 22:28:20 +00:00
kunit: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros to core modules make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports in lib/kunit: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/kunit/kunit.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/kunit/kunit-test.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.o Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-06-01 10:19:11 -07:00
kunit: allow kunit tests to be loaded as a module As tests are added to kunit, it will become less feasible to execute all built tests together. By supporting modular tests we provide a simple way to do selective execution on a running system; specifying CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m ...means we can simply "insmod example-test.ko" to run the tests. To achieve this we need to do the following: o export the required symbols in kunit o string-stream tests utilize non-exported symbols so for now we skip building them when CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=m. o drivers/base/power/qos-test.c contains a few unexported interface references, namely freq_qos_read_value() and freq_constraints_init(). Both of these could be potentially defined as static inline functions in include/linux/pm_qos.h, but for now we simply avoid supporting module build for that test suite. o support a new way of declaring test suites. Because a module cannot do multiple late_initcall()s, we provide a kunit_test_suites() macro to declare multiple suites within the same module at once. o some test module names would have been too general ("test-test" and "example-test" for kunit tests, "inode-test" for ext4 tests); rename these as appropriate ("kunit-test", "kunit-example-test" and "ext4-inode-test" respectively). Also define kunit_test_suite() via kunit_test_suites() as callers in other trees may need the old definition. Co-developed-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> # for ext4 bits Acked-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> # For list-test Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-01-06 22:28:20 +00:00