linux/security/landlock/syscalls.c

706 lines
23 KiB

landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_*_EXEC_* flags Most of the time we want to log denied access because they should not happen and such information helps diagnose issues. However, when sandboxing processes that we know will try to access denied resources (e.g. unknown, bogus, or malicious binary), we might want to not log related access requests that might fill up logs. By default, denied requests are logged until the task call execve(2). If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF flag is set, denied requests will not be logged for the same executed file. If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON flag is set, denied requests from after an execve(2) call will be logged. The rationale is that a program should know its own behavior, but not necessarily the behavior of other programs. Because LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF is set for a specific Landlock domain, it makes it possible to selectively mask some access requests that would be logged by a parent domain, which might be handy for unprivileged processes to limit logs. However, system administrators should still use the audit filtering mechanism. There is intentionally no audit nor sysctl configuration to re-enable these logs. This is delegated to the user space program. Increment the Landlock ABI version to reflect this interface change. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250320190717.2287696-18-mic@digikod.net [mic: Rename variables and fix __maybe_unused] Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-20 20:07:06 +01:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_*_EXEC_* flags Most of the time we want to log denied access because they should not happen and such information helps diagnose issues. However, when sandboxing processes that we know will try to access denied resources (e.g. unknown, bogus, or malicious binary), we might want to not log related access requests that might fill up logs. By default, denied requests are logged until the task call execve(2). If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF flag is set, denied requests will not be logged for the same executed file. If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON flag is set, denied requests from after an execve(2) call will be logged. The rationale is that a program should know its own behavior, but not necessarily the behavior of other programs. Because LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF is set for a specific Landlock domain, it makes it possible to selectively mask some access requests that would be logged by a parent domain, which might be handy for unprivileged processes to limit logs. However, system administrators should still use the audit filtering mechanism. There is intentionally no audit nor sysctl configuration to re-enable these logs. This is delegated to the user space program. Increment the Landlock ABI version to reflect this interface change. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250320190717.2287696-18-mic@digikod.net [mic: Rename variables and fix __maybe_unused] Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-20 20:07:06 +01:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add landlock_enforce_domain tracepoint The landlock_create_domain event records that a domain was created, once, before thread-sync. It cannot tell which threads end up enforcing it: a successful landlock_restrict_self(2) with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC applies the domain to the caller and every eligible sibling. Creation (the operation) and enforcement (the per-thread outcome) are distinct. Add landlock_enforce_domain(domain, complete, process_wide), emitted once per thread the domain is applied to, strictly after that thread's commit_creds(), so it fires only for a thread that is enforcing the domain, never speculatively; an aborted operation emits none. The lifecycle now reads create -> enforce* -> free. The two booleans name properties, not the implementation: - complete: marks the single event that concludes the operation. It names the outcome, the set is now enforced, not which thread finishes, which the contract leaves unspecified. - process_wide: means every eligible thread of the process is covered. It is set race-free by either establishing path, thread-sync or a single-threaded process, so complete && process_wide is the whole-process-enforced guarantee. The requesting thread and source ruleset are not repeated here: they are on create_domain (joined via domain->hierarchy->id) and on the immutable domain->hierarchy->details. Source ruleset means the ruleset_id and ruleset_version recorded on create_domain, not the ruleset object, which the caller may close before enforcement. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-11-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:24 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_*_EXEC_* flags Most of the time we want to log denied access because they should not happen and such information helps diagnose issues. However, when sandboxing processes that we know will try to access denied resources (e.g. unknown, bogus, or malicious binary), we might want to not log related access requests that might fill up logs. By default, denied requests are logged until the task call execve(2). If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF flag is set, denied requests will not be logged for the same executed file. If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON flag is set, denied requests from after an execve(2) call will be logged. The rationale is that a program should know its own behavior, but not necessarily the behavior of other programs. Because LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF is set for a specific Landlock domain, it makes it possible to selectively mask some access requests that would be logged by a parent domain, which might be handy for unprivileged processes to limit logs. However, system administrators should still use the audit filtering mechanism. There is intentionally no audit nor sysctl configuration to re-enable these logs. This is delegated to the user space program. Increment the Landlock ABI version to reflect this interface change. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250320190717.2287696-18-mic@digikod.net [mic: Rename variables and fix __maybe_unused] Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-20 20:07:06 +01:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add create_ruleset and free_ruleset tracepoints Add the first Landlock tracepoints, for ruleset lifecycle: landlock_create_ruleset fires from the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall handler, and landlock_free_ruleset fires in free_ruleset() before the ruleset is freed. These tracepoints, and the ones added by the following commits, share a common design. Rather than one polymorphic event distinguished by a status field (as audit uses a shared record type with a "status=" field), each lifecycle transition and denial type gets its own event with a type-safe TP_PROTO, giving precise ftrace filtering by event name and type-safe eBPF access. TP_PROTO passes the object pointer and the fields are read from it in TP_fast_assign, so an eBPF program reads the full object state (rules, access masks, hierarchy) via BTF from a single pointer rather than from the flattened TP_STRUCT__entry fields. The whole cost is paid only when a tracer is attached; the static branch is not taken otherwise. Trace fields carry the bare access-right and scope names (read_file), reusing the audit name tables; audit prepends the category (fs.read_file), which the trace event name already conveys. The trace header's DOC comment documents the consistency and locking guarantees these events share. create_ruleset needs no lock because the ruleset is not yet shared (its file descriptor is not yet installed). The deallocation events use the "free_" prefix, not "drop_", because they fire when the object is actually freed. Add trace.c, built for CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS, which defines CREATE_TRACE_POINTS, and extend CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG to also be selected by CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS so the common log framework is available to a tracepoints-only build. Add an id field to struct landlock_ruleset, gated on CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS and assigned from landlock_get_id_range() at creation. Only the tracepoints consume it (audit identifies domains, not rulesets), so it does not exist in an audit-only build. The Landlock ID is a stable u64 that names the ruleset across the trace stream and uses the same scheme as audit, so a ruleset can be correlated between trace and audit records. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-8-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:21 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_*_EXEC_* flags Most of the time we want to log denied access because they should not happen and such information helps diagnose issues. However, when sandboxing processes that we know will try to access denied resources (e.g. unknown, bogus, or malicious binary), we might want to not log related access requests that might fill up logs. By default, denied requests are logged until the task call execve(2). If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF flag is set, denied requests will not be logged for the same executed file. If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON flag is set, denied requests from after an execve(2) call will be logged. The rationale is that a program should know its own behavior, but not necessarily the behavior of other programs. Because LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF is set for a specific Landlock domain, it makes it possible to selectively mask some access requests that would be logged by a parent domain, which might be handy for unprivileged processes to limit logs. However, system administrators should still use the audit filtering mechanism. There is intentionally no audit nor sysctl configuration to re-enable these logs. This is delegated to the user space program. Increment the Landlock ABI version to reflect this interface change. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250320190717.2287696-18-mic@digikod.net [mic: Rename variables and fix __maybe_unused] Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-20 20:07:06 +01:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_*_EXEC_* flags Most of the time we want to log denied access because they should not happen and such information helps diagnose issues. However, when sandboxing processes that we know will try to access denied resources (e.g. unknown, bogus, or malicious binary), we might want to not log related access requests that might fill up logs. By default, denied requests are logged until the task call execve(2). If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF flag is set, denied requests will not be logged for the same executed file. If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON flag is set, denied requests from after an execve(2) call will be logged. The rationale is that a program should know its own behavior, but not necessarily the behavior of other programs. Because LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF is set for a specific Landlock domain, it makes it possible to selectively mask some access requests that would be logged by a parent domain, which might be handy for unprivileged processes to limit logs. However, system administrators should still use the audit filtering mechanism. There is intentionally no audit nor sysctl configuration to re-enable these logs. This is delegated to the user space program. Increment the Landlock ABI version to reflect this interface change. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250320190717.2287696-18-mic@digikod.net [mic: Rename variables and fix __maybe_unused] Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-20 20:07:06 +01:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_*_EXEC_* flags Most of the time we want to log denied access because they should not happen and such information helps diagnose issues. However, when sandboxing processes that we know will try to access denied resources (e.g. unknown, bogus, or malicious binary), we might want to not log related access requests that might fill up logs. By default, denied requests are logged until the task call execve(2). If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF flag is set, denied requests will not be logged for the same executed file. If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON flag is set, denied requests from after an execve(2) call will be logged. The rationale is that a program should know its own behavior, but not necessarily the behavior of other programs. Because LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF is set for a specific Landlock domain, it makes it possible to selectively mask some access requests that would be logged by a parent domain, which might be handy for unprivileged processes to limit logs. However, system administrators should still use the audit filtering mechanism. There is intentionally no audit nor sysctl configuration to re-enable these logs. This is delegated to the user space program. Increment the Landlock ABI version to reflect this interface change. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250320190717.2287696-18-mic@digikod.net [mic: Rename variables and fix __maybe_unused] Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-20 20:07:06 +01:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Add a landlock_restrict_self(2) flag to set the no_new_privs attribute of the calling thread only after enforcement of the ruleset: no_new_privs is set if and only if the call succeeds. This removes the need for a prior prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call and guarantees that a failed enforcement leaves the attribute unchanged. Because no_new_privs is set by the call itself, the no_new_privs / CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement of landlock_restrict_self(2) is fulfilled by construction, and the related EPERM check is skipped. Unlike LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF, this flag always requires a valid ruleset: with a ruleset_fd of -1, such a call would be nothing more than a Landlock-flavored prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, and there is no valid use case for setting no_new_privs (possibly with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC) without also enforcing Landlock restrictions. Rejecting these calls also keeps the option of giving them a meaning later. The attribute is only set past the last point of failure, just before committing the new credentials. When combined with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC, no_new_privs is set on the sibling threads as well, in their commit phase, with the same ordering. Bump the Landlock ABI version to 11, and include the minimal related test changes to keep the tests bisectable. Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260809212459.2427878-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-09 17:24:59 -04:00
landlock: Enable user space to infer supported features Add a new flag LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION to landlock_create_ruleset(2). This enables to retreive a Landlock ABI version that is useful to efficiently follow a best-effort security approach. Indeed, it would be a missed opportunity to abort the whole sandbox building, because some features are unavailable, instead of protecting users as much as possible with the subset of features provided by the running kernel. This new flag enables user space to identify the minimum set of Landlock features supported by the running kernel without relying on a filesystem interface (e.g. /proc/version, which might be inaccessible) nor testing multiple syscall argument combinations (i.e. syscall bisection). New Landlock features will be documented and tied to a minimum version number (greater than 1). The current version will be incremented for each new kernel release supporting new Landlock features. User space libraries can leverage this information to seamlessly restrict processes as much as possible while being compatible with newer APIs. This is a much more lighter approach than the previous landlock_get_features(2): the complexity is pushed to user space libraries. This flag meets similar needs as securityfs versions: selinux/policyvers, apparmor/features/*/version* and tomoyo/version. Supporting this flag now will be convenient for backward compatibility. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-14-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:23 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add the errata interface Some fixes may require user space to check if they are applied on the running kernel before using a specific feature. For instance, this applies when a restriction was previously too restrictive and is now getting relaxed (e.g. for compatibility reasons). However, non-visible changes for legitimate use (e.g. security fixes) do not require an erratum. Because fixes are backported down to a specific Landlock ABI, we need a way to avoid cherry-pick conflicts. The solution is to only update a file related to the lower ABI impacted by this issue. All the ABI files are then used to create a bitmask of fixes. The new errata interface is similar to the one used to get the supported Landlock ABI version, but it returns a bitmask instead because the order of fixes may not match the order of versions, and not all fixes may apply to all versions. The actual errata will come with dedicated commits. The description is not actually used in the code but serves as documentation. Create the landlock_abi_version symbol and use its value to check errata consistency. Update test_base's create_ruleset_checks_ordering tests and add errata tests. This commit is backportable down to the first version of Landlock. Fixes: 3532b0b4352c ("landlock: Enable user space to infer supported features") Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161443.279194-3-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-18 17:14:37 +01:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add the errata interface Some fixes may require user space to check if they are applied on the running kernel before using a specific feature. For instance, this applies when a restriction was previously too restrictive and is now getting relaxed (e.g. for compatibility reasons). However, non-visible changes for legitimate use (e.g. security fixes) do not require an erratum. Because fixes are backported down to a specific Landlock ABI, we need a way to avoid cherry-pick conflicts. The solution is to only update a file related to the lower ABI impacted by this issue. All the ABI files are then used to create a bitmask of fixes. The new errata interface is similar to the one used to get the supported Landlock ABI version, but it returns a bitmask instead because the order of fixes may not match the order of versions, and not all fixes may apply to all versions. The actual errata will come with dedicated commits. The description is not actually used in the code but serves as documentation. Create the landlock_abi_version symbol and use its value to check errata consistency. Update test_base's create_ruleset_checks_ordering tests and add errata tests. This commit is backportable down to the first version of Landlock. Fixes: 3532b0b4352c ("landlock: Enable user space to infer supported features") Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161443.279194-3-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-18 17:14:37 +01:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Enable user space to infer supported features Add a new flag LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION to landlock_create_ruleset(2). This enables to retreive a Landlock ABI version that is useful to efficiently follow a best-effort security approach. Indeed, it would be a missed opportunity to abort the whole sandbox building, because some features are unavailable, instead of protecting users as much as possible with the subset of features provided by the running kernel. This new flag enables user space to identify the minimum set of Landlock features supported by the running kernel without relying on a filesystem interface (e.g. /proc/version, which might be inaccessible) nor testing multiple syscall argument combinations (i.e. syscall bisection). New Landlock features will be documented and tied to a minimum version number (greater than 1). The current version will be incremented for each new kernel release supporting new Landlock features. User space libraries can leverage this information to seamlessly restrict processes as much as possible while being compatible with newer APIs. This is a much more lighter approach than the previous landlock_get_features(2): the complexity is pushed to user space libraries. This flag meets similar needs as securityfs versions: selinux/policyvers, apparmor/features/*/version* and tomoyo/version. Supporting this flag now will be convenient for backward compatibility. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-14-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:23 +02:00
landlock: Add the errata interface Some fixes may require user space to check if they are applied on the running kernel before using a specific feature. For instance, this applies when a restriction was previously too restrictive and is now getting relaxed (e.g. for compatibility reasons). However, non-visible changes for legitimate use (e.g. security fixes) do not require an erratum. Because fixes are backported down to a specific Landlock ABI, we need a way to avoid cherry-pick conflicts. The solution is to only update a file related to the lower ABI impacted by this issue. All the ABI files are then used to create a bitmask of fixes. The new errata interface is similar to the one used to get the supported Landlock ABI version, but it returns a bitmask instead because the order of fixes may not match the order of versions, and not all fixes may apply to all versions. The actual errata will come with dedicated commits. The description is not actually used in the code but serves as documentation. Create the landlock_abi_version symbol and use its value to check errata consistency. Update test_base's create_ruleset_checks_ordering tests and add errata tests. This commit is backportable down to the first version of Landlock. Fixes: 3532b0b4352c ("landlock: Enable user space to infer supported features") Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318161443.279194-3-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-18 17:14:37 +01:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Enable user space to infer supported features Add a new flag LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION to landlock_create_ruleset(2). This enables to retreive a Landlock ABI version that is useful to efficiently follow a best-effort security approach. Indeed, it would be a missed opportunity to abort the whole sandbox building, because some features are unavailable, instead of protecting users as much as possible with the subset of features provided by the running kernel. This new flag enables user space to identify the minimum set of Landlock features supported by the running kernel without relying on a filesystem interface (e.g. /proc/version, which might be inaccessible) nor testing multiple syscall argument combinations (i.e. syscall bisection). New Landlock features will be documented and tied to a minimum version number (greater than 1). The current version will be incremented for each new kernel release supporting new Landlock features. User space libraries can leverage this information to seamlessly restrict processes as much as possible while being compatible with newer APIs. This is a much more lighter approach than the previous landlock_get_features(2): the complexity is pushed to user space libraries. This flag meets similar needs as securityfs versions: selinux/policyvers, apparmor/features/*/version* and tomoyo/version. Supporting this flag now will be convenient for backward compatibility. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-14-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:23 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add create_ruleset and free_ruleset tracepoints Add the first Landlock tracepoints, for ruleset lifecycle: landlock_create_ruleset fires from the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall handler, and landlock_free_ruleset fires in free_ruleset() before the ruleset is freed. These tracepoints, and the ones added by the following commits, share a common design. Rather than one polymorphic event distinguished by a status field (as audit uses a shared record type with a "status=" field), each lifecycle transition and denial type gets its own event with a type-safe TP_PROTO, giving precise ftrace filtering by event name and type-safe eBPF access. TP_PROTO passes the object pointer and the fields are read from it in TP_fast_assign, so an eBPF program reads the full object state (rules, access masks, hierarchy) via BTF from a single pointer rather than from the flattened TP_STRUCT__entry fields. The whole cost is paid only when a tracer is attached; the static branch is not taken otherwise. Trace fields carry the bare access-right and scope names (read_file), reusing the audit name tables; audit prepends the category (fs.read_file), which the trace event name already conveys. The trace header's DOC comment documents the consistency and locking guarantees these events share. create_ruleset needs no lock because the ruleset is not yet shared (its file descriptor is not yet installed). The deallocation events use the "free_" prefix, not "drop_", because they fire when the object is actually freed. Add trace.c, built for CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS, which defines CREATE_TRACE_POINTS, and extend CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG to also be selected by CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS so the common log framework is available to a tracepoints-only build. Add an id field to struct landlock_ruleset, gated on CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS and assigned from landlock_get_id_range() at creation. Only the tracepoints consume it (audit identifies domains, not rulesets), so it does not exist in an audit-only build. The Landlock ID is a stable u64 that names the ruleset across the trace stream and uses the same scheme as audit, so a ruleset can be correlated between trace and audit records. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-8-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:21 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Split struct landlock_domain from struct landlock_ruleset Switch all domain users to the new struct landlock_domain type introduced by a previous commit, eliminating the conflation between mutable rulesets and immutable domains. landlock_merge_ruleset() now returns and allocates a struct landlock_domain, and the merge and inherit helpers move next to it; the former static insert_rule() is exported as landlock_store_rule() for its new caller across the translation-unit boundary. The merge destination is now a private struct landlock_domain still under construction (owned by the calling thread, not yet shared), so the merge and inherit helpers lock only the source ruleset: the previous lock of both destination and source collapses to a single mutex_lock(&src->lock). Rename the per-layer access-mask field from access_masks to handled_masks, naming it by the role it plays (the rights each layer handles) rather than by its type, paralleling the struct access_masks quiet_masks field. Drop the now domain-only fields (hierarchy, work_free, num_layers) from struct landlock_ruleset. The new struct landlock_domain field in cred.h pulls in domain.h, which includes audit.h, which previously included cred.h, forming an include cycle. Break it by having audit.h forward-declare the struct landlock_cred_security and struct landlock_hierarchy it uses instead of including cred.h. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-4-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:17 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Split struct landlock_domain from struct landlock_ruleset Switch all domain users to the new struct landlock_domain type introduced by a previous commit, eliminating the conflation between mutable rulesets and immutable domains. landlock_merge_ruleset() now returns and allocates a struct landlock_domain, and the merge and inherit helpers move next to it; the former static insert_rule() is exported as landlock_store_rule() for its new caller across the translation-unit boundary. The merge destination is now a private struct landlock_domain still under construction (owned by the calling thread, not yet shared), so the merge and inherit helpers lock only the source ruleset: the previous lock of both destination and source collapses to a single mutex_lock(&src->lock). Rename the per-layer access-mask field from access_masks to handled_masks, naming it by the role it plays (the rights each layer handles) rather than by its type, paralleling the struct access_masks quiet_masks field. Drop the now domain-only fields (hierarchy, work_free, num_layers) from struct landlock_ruleset. The new struct landlock_domain field in cred.h pulls in domain.h, which includes audit.h, which previously included cred.h, forming an include cycle. Break it by having audit.h forward-declare the struct landlock_cred_security and struct landlock_hierarchy it uses instead of including cred.h. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-4-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:17 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect Add network rules support in the ruleset management helpers and the landlock_create_ruleset() syscall. Extend user space API to support network actions: * Add new network access rights: LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP and LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP. * Add a new network rule type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT tied to struct landlock_net_port_attr. The allowed_access field contains the network access rights, and the port field contains the port value according to the controlled protocol. This field can take up to a 64-bit value but the maximum value depends on the related protocol (e.g. 16-bit value for TCP). Network port is in host endianness [1]. * Add a new handled_access_net field to struct landlock_ruleset_attr that contains network access rights. * Increment the Landlock ABI version to 4. Implement socket_bind() and socket_connect() LSM hooks, which enable to control TCP socket binding and connection to specific ports. Expand access_masks_t from u16 to u32 to be able to store network access rights alongside filesystem access rights for rulesets' handled access rights. Access rights are not tied to socket file descriptors but checked at bind() or connect() call time against the caller's Landlock domain. For the filesystem, a file descriptor is a direct access to a file/data. However, for network sockets, we cannot identify for which data or peer a newly created socket will give access to. Indeed, we need to wait for a connect or bind request to identify the use case for this socket. Likewise a directory file descriptor may enable to open another file (i.e. a new data item), but this opening is also restricted by the caller's domain, not the file descriptor's access rights [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/278ab07f-7583-a4e0-3d37-1bacd091531d@digikod.net [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/263c1eb3-602f-57fe-8450-3f138581bee7@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026014751.414649-9-konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com [mic: Extend commit message, fix typo in comments, and specify endianness in the documentation] Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2023-10-26 09:47:47 +08:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_*_EXEC_* flags Most of the time we want to log denied access because they should not happen and such information helps diagnose issues. However, when sandboxing processes that we know will try to access denied resources (e.g. unknown, bogus, or malicious binary), we might want to not log related access requests that might fill up logs. By default, denied requests are logged until the task call execve(2). If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF flag is set, denied requests will not be logged for the same executed file. If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON flag is set, denied requests from after an execve(2) call will be logged. The rationale is that a program should know its own behavior, but not necessarily the behavior of other programs. Because LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF is set for a specific Landlock domain, it makes it possible to selectively mask some access requests that would be logged by a parent domain, which might be handy for unprivileged processes to limit logs. However, system administrators should still use the audit filtering mechanism. There is intentionally no audit nor sysctl configuration to re-enable these logs. This is delegated to the user space program. Increment the Landlock ABI version to reflect this interface change. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250320190717.2287696-18-mic@digikod.net [mic: Rename variables and fix __maybe_unused] Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-20 20:07:06 +01:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Add a landlock_restrict_self(2) flag to set the no_new_privs attribute of the calling thread only after enforcement of the ruleset: no_new_privs is set if and only if the call succeeds. This removes the need for a prior prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call and guarantees that a failed enforcement leaves the attribute unchanged. Because no_new_privs is set by the call itself, the no_new_privs / CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement of landlock_restrict_self(2) is fulfilled by construction, and the related EPERM check is skipped. Unlike LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF, this flag always requires a valid ruleset: with a ruleset_fd of -1, such a call would be nothing more than a Landlock-flavored prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, and there is no valid use case for setting no_new_privs (possibly with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC) without also enforcing Landlock restrictions. Rejecting these calls also keeps the option of giving them a meaning later. The attribute is only set past the last point of failure, just before committing the new credentials. When combined with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC, no_new_privs is set on the sibling threads as well, in their commit phase, with the same ordering. Bump the Landlock ABI version to 11, and include the minimal related test changes to keep the tests bisectable. Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260809212459.2427878-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-09 17:24:59 -04:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Add a landlock_restrict_self(2) flag to set the no_new_privs attribute of the calling thread only after enforcement of the ruleset: no_new_privs is set if and only if the call succeeds. This removes the need for a prior prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call and guarantees that a failed enforcement leaves the attribute unchanged. Because no_new_privs is set by the call itself, the no_new_privs / CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement of landlock_restrict_self(2) is fulfilled by construction, and the related EPERM check is skipped. Unlike LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF, this flag always requires a valid ruleset: with a ruleset_fd of -1, such a call would be nothing more than a Landlock-flavored prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, and there is no valid use case for setting no_new_privs (possibly with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC) without also enforcing Landlock restrictions. Rejecting these calls also keeps the option of giving them a meaning later. The attribute is only set past the last point of failure, just before committing the new credentials. When combined with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC, no_new_privs is set on the sibling threads as well, in their commit phase, with the same ordering. Bump the Landlock ABI version to 11, and include the minimal related test changes to keep the tests bisectable. Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260809212459.2427878-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-09 17:24:59 -04:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_*_EXEC_* flags Most of the time we want to log denied access because they should not happen and such information helps diagnose issues. However, when sandboxing processes that we know will try to access denied resources (e.g. unknown, bogus, or malicious binary), we might want to not log related access requests that might fill up logs. By default, denied requests are logged until the task call execve(2). If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF flag is set, denied requests will not be logged for the same executed file. If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON flag is set, denied requests from after an execve(2) call will be logged. The rationale is that a program should know its own behavior, but not necessarily the behavior of other programs. Because LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF is set for a specific Landlock domain, it makes it possible to selectively mask some access requests that would be logged by a parent domain, which might be handy for unprivileged processes to limit logs. However, system administrators should still use the audit filtering mechanism. There is intentionally no audit nor sysctl configuration to re-enable these logs. This is delegated to the user space program. Increment the Landlock ABI version to reflect this interface change. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250320190717.2287696-18-mic@digikod.net [mic: Rename variables and fix __maybe_unused] Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-20 20:07:06 +01:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Add a landlock_restrict_self(2) flag to set the no_new_privs attribute of the calling thread only after enforcement of the ruleset: no_new_privs is set if and only if the call succeeds. This removes the need for a prior prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call and guarantees that a failed enforcement leaves the attribute unchanged. Because no_new_privs is set by the call itself, the no_new_privs / CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement of landlock_restrict_self(2) is fulfilled by construction, and the related EPERM check is skipped. Unlike LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF, this flag always requires a valid ruleset: with a ruleset_fd of -1, such a call would be nothing more than a Landlock-flavored prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, and there is no valid use case for setting no_new_privs (possibly with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC) without also enforcing Landlock restrictions. Rejecting these calls also keeps the option of giving them a meaning later. The attribute is only set past the last point of failure, just before committing the new credentials. When combined with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC, no_new_privs is set on the sibling threads as well, in their commit phase, with the same ordering. Bump the Landlock ABI version to 11, and include the minimal related test changes to keep the tests bisectable. Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260809212459.2427878-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-09 17:24:59 -04:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add create_domain and free_domain tracepoints Add a landlock_create_domain tracepoint emitted from landlock_restrict_self() after the new domain is created, so a consumer can correlate the source ruleset with the resulting domain. The flags-only path (ruleset_fd == -1) creates no domain and emits no event. Move the ruleset lock acquisition from landlock_merge_ruleset() to the caller so the lock is held across both the merge and the tracepoint emission, giving an eBPF program a consistent ruleset snapshot. Release it before the thread-sync: holding ruleset->lock across landlock_restrict_sibling_threads() would deadlock a sibling blocked on the same lock. The event therefore fires before the (rare) thread-sync failure path; when that path aborts the just-created domain, the matching free_domain event fires so the create/free pair stays balanced. Add a landlock_free_domain tracepoint that fires when a domain's hierarchy node is freed. The hierarchy node is the lifecycle boundary because it represents the domain's identity and outlives the domain's access masks, which may still be active in descendant domains. A domain freed without ever being committed to a credential was never visible to user space, so free_domain is suppressed for it. This is tracked by a new landlock_log_status value, LANDLOCK_LOG_UNCOMMITTED, which is also the zero value so a hierarchy whose initialization failed defaults to not observable. A hierarchy is born UNCOMMITTED and is promoted to LANDLOCK_LOG_PENDING (or LANDLOCK_LOG_DISABLED when logging is off) right after its create_domain event fires; a thread-sync failure does not reset it, so an aborted domain that already emitted create_domain still emits the matching free_domain. Promoting right after the event, rather than at commit_creds() time, avoids a race: on a successful thread-sync the sibling threads commit the new domain in lockstep before landlock_restrict_self() returns, so the shared domain may already have moved to LANDLOCK_LOG_RECORDED through a plain store, and a late promotion would race that store and could unbalance the domain allocation and deallocation audit records. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-10-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:23 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add landlock_enforce_domain tracepoint The landlock_create_domain event records that a domain was created, once, before thread-sync. It cannot tell which threads end up enforcing it: a successful landlock_restrict_self(2) with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC applies the domain to the caller and every eligible sibling. Creation (the operation) and enforcement (the per-thread outcome) are distinct. Add landlock_enforce_domain(domain, complete, process_wide), emitted once per thread the domain is applied to, strictly after that thread's commit_creds(), so it fires only for a thread that is enforcing the domain, never speculatively; an aborted operation emits none. The lifecycle now reads create -> enforce* -> free. The two booleans name properties, not the implementation: - complete: marks the single event that concludes the operation. It names the outcome, the set is now enforced, not which thread finishes, which the contract leaves unspecified. - process_wide: means every eligible thread of the process is covered. It is set race-free by either establishing path, thread-sync or a single-threaded process, so complete && process_wide is the whole-process-enforced guarantee. The requesting thread and source ruleset are not repeated here: they are on create_domain (joined via domain->hierarchy->id) and on the immutable domain->hierarchy->details. Source ruleset means the ruleset_id and ruleset_version recorded on create_domain, not the ruleset object, which the caller may close before enforcement. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-11-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:24 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Add a landlock_restrict_self(2) flag to set the no_new_privs attribute of the calling thread only after enforcement of the ruleset: no_new_privs is set if and only if the call succeeds. This removes the need for a prior prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call and guarantees that a failed enforcement leaves the attribute unchanged. Because no_new_privs is set by the call itself, the no_new_privs / CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement of landlock_restrict_self(2) is fulfilled by construction, and the related EPERM check is skipped. Unlike LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF, this flag always requires a valid ruleset: with a ruleset_fd of -1, such a call would be nothing more than a Landlock-flavored prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, and there is no valid use case for setting no_new_privs (possibly with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC) without also enforcing Landlock restrictions. Rejecting these calls also keeps the option of giving them a meaning later. The attribute is only set past the last point of failure, just before committing the new credentials. When combined with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC, no_new_privs is set on the sibling threads as well, in their commit phase, with the same ordering. Bump the Landlock ABI version to 11, and include the minimal related test changes to keep the tests bisectable. Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260809212459.2427878-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-09 17:24:59 -04:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Add a landlock_restrict_self(2) flag to set the no_new_privs attribute of the calling thread only after enforcement of the ruleset: no_new_privs is set if and only if the call succeeds. This removes the need for a prior prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call and guarantees that a failed enforcement leaves the attribute unchanged. Because no_new_privs is set by the call itself, the no_new_privs / CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement of landlock_restrict_self(2) is fulfilled by construction, and the related EPERM check is skipped. Unlike LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF, this flag always requires a valid ruleset: with a ruleset_fd of -1, such a call would be nothing more than a Landlock-flavored prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, and there is no valid use case for setting no_new_privs (possibly with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC) without also enforcing Landlock restrictions. Rejecting these calls also keeps the option of giving them a meaning later. The attribute is only set past the last point of failure, just before committing the new credentials. When combined with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC, no_new_privs is set on the sibling threads as well, in their commit phase, with the same ordering. Bump the Landlock ABI version to 11, and include the minimal related test changes to keep the tests bisectable. Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260809212459.2427878-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-09 17:24:59 -04:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_*_EXEC_* flags Most of the time we want to log denied access because they should not happen and such information helps diagnose issues. However, when sandboxing processes that we know will try to access denied resources (e.g. unknown, bogus, or malicious binary), we might want to not log related access requests that might fill up logs. By default, denied requests are logged until the task call execve(2). If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF flag is set, denied requests will not be logged for the same executed file. If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON flag is set, denied requests from after an execve(2) call will be logged. The rationale is that a program should know its own behavior, but not necessarily the behavior of other programs. Because LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF is set for a specific Landlock domain, it makes it possible to selectively mask some access requests that would be logged by a parent domain, which might be handy for unprivileged processes to limit logs. However, system administrators should still use the audit filtering mechanism. There is intentionally no audit nor sysctl configuration to re-enable these logs. This is delegated to the user space program. Increment the Landlock ABI version to reflect this interface change. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250320190717.2287696-18-mic@digikod.net [mic: Rename variables and fix __maybe_unused] Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-20 20:07:06 +01:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_*_EXEC_* flags Most of the time we want to log denied access because they should not happen and such information helps diagnose issues. However, when sandboxing processes that we know will try to access denied resources (e.g. unknown, bogus, or malicious binary), we might want to not log related access requests that might fill up logs. By default, denied requests are logged until the task call execve(2). If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF flag is set, denied requests will not be logged for the same executed file. If the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON flag is set, denied requests from after an execve(2) call will be logged. The rationale is that a program should know its own behavior, but not necessarily the behavior of other programs. Because LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF is set for a specific Landlock domain, it makes it possible to selectively mask some access requests that would be logged by a parent domain, which might be handy for unprivileged processes to limit logs. However, system administrators should still use the audit filtering mechanism. There is intentionally no audit nor sysctl configuration to re-enable these logs. This is delegated to the user space program. Increment the Landlock ABI version to reflect this interface change. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250320190717.2287696-18-mic@digikod.net [mic: Rename variables and fix __maybe_unused] Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-03-20 20:07:06 +01:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Split denial logging from audit into common framework Tracepoint emission requires the denial framework (layer identification, request validation) without depending on CONFIG_AUDIT. Separate the denial logging infrastructure from the audit-specific code by introducing a common log framework. Create CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, enabled by default when CONFIG_AUDIT is set; a following commit extends it to CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS when the first tracepoint consumer is added. Move the common framework (the request types, the layer identification and request validation, and the landlock_log_denial() and landlock_log_free_domain() entry points) into log.c and log.h, and keep the audit-specific record formatting in audit.c. log.o is built for CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG and audit.o for CONFIG_AUDIT, so the common framework is available to a tracepoints-only build. The entry points dispatch to no-op static inline audit stubs without CONFIG_AUDIT, so the call sites stay unconditional. Rename the former landlock_log_drop_domain() to landlock_log_free_domain() to match the landlock_free_domain tracepoint added in a following commit. landlock_log_denial() counts denials even without audit, so its declaration and no-op stub are guarded by CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, not CONFIG_AUDIT; a CONFIG_AUDIT guard would expose the stub and clash with log.c's definition in a tracepoints-only build. Widen the ID allocation (id.o and the landlock_init_id() / landlock_get_id_range() declarations) and the log-state representation (the domain_exec and log_subdomains_off credential fields, the landlock_hierarchy log fields, and the code that maintains them) from CONFIG_AUDIT to CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, so each field and its writer share one guard and are available to tracing without audit support. Widen the denial-path state that feeds the per-denial logging decision the same way, so the "logged" verdict is computed identically whether or not CONFIG_AUDIT is set. Widening fown_layer is what keeps the file-owner-signal path valid without audit: otherwise hook_file_send_sigiotask() would leave layer_plus_one at zero, tripping the is_valid_request() canary and dropping the LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL denial from tracing. The ruleset-level quiet_masks stays on no CONFIG guard: it is builder state validated and stored from user input, kept available so LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET flags are accepted and ignored, not rejected, when CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG is disabled. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-5-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:18 +02:00
landlock: Split denial logging from audit into common framework Tracepoint emission requires the denial framework (layer identification, request validation) without depending on CONFIG_AUDIT. Separate the denial logging infrastructure from the audit-specific code by introducing a common log framework. Create CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, enabled by default when CONFIG_AUDIT is set; a following commit extends it to CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS when the first tracepoint consumer is added. Move the common framework (the request types, the layer identification and request validation, and the landlock_log_denial() and landlock_log_free_domain() entry points) into log.c and log.h, and keep the audit-specific record formatting in audit.c. log.o is built for CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG and audit.o for CONFIG_AUDIT, so the common framework is available to a tracepoints-only build. The entry points dispatch to no-op static inline audit stubs without CONFIG_AUDIT, so the call sites stay unconditional. Rename the former landlock_log_drop_domain() to landlock_log_free_domain() to match the landlock_free_domain tracepoint added in a following commit. landlock_log_denial() counts denials even without audit, so its declaration and no-op stub are guarded by CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, not CONFIG_AUDIT; a CONFIG_AUDIT guard would expose the stub and clash with log.c's definition in a tracepoints-only build. Widen the ID allocation (id.o and the landlock_init_id() / landlock_get_id_range() declarations) and the log-state representation (the domain_exec and log_subdomains_off credential fields, the landlock_hierarchy log fields, and the code that maintains them) from CONFIG_AUDIT to CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, so each field and its writer share one guard and are available to tracing without audit support. Widen the denial-path state that feeds the per-denial logging decision the same way, so the "logged" verdict is computed identically whether or not CONFIG_AUDIT is set. Widening fown_layer is what keeps the file-owner-signal path valid without audit: otherwise hook_file_send_sigiotask() would leave layer_plus_one at zero, tripping the is_valid_request() canary and dropping the LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL denial from tracing. The ruleset-level quiet_masks stays on no CONFIG guard: it is builder state validated and stored from user input, kept available so LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET flags are accepted and ignored, not rejected, when CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG is disabled. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-5-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:18 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add create_domain and free_domain tracepoints Add a landlock_create_domain tracepoint emitted from landlock_restrict_self() after the new domain is created, so a consumer can correlate the source ruleset with the resulting domain. The flags-only path (ruleset_fd == -1) creates no domain and emits no event. Move the ruleset lock acquisition from landlock_merge_ruleset() to the caller so the lock is held across both the merge and the tracepoint emission, giving an eBPF program a consistent ruleset snapshot. Release it before the thread-sync: holding ruleset->lock across landlock_restrict_sibling_threads() would deadlock a sibling blocked on the same lock. The event therefore fires before the (rare) thread-sync failure path; when that path aborts the just-created domain, the matching free_domain event fires so the create/free pair stays balanced. Add a landlock_free_domain tracepoint that fires when a domain's hierarchy node is freed. The hierarchy node is the lifecycle boundary because it represents the domain's identity and outlives the domain's access masks, which may still be active in descendant domains. A domain freed without ever being committed to a credential was never visible to user space, so free_domain is suppressed for it. This is tracked by a new landlock_log_status value, LANDLOCK_LOG_UNCOMMITTED, which is also the zero value so a hierarchy whose initialization failed defaults to not observable. A hierarchy is born UNCOMMITTED and is promoted to LANDLOCK_LOG_PENDING (or LANDLOCK_LOG_DISABLED when logging is off) right after its create_domain event fires; a thread-sync failure does not reset it, so an aborted domain that already emitted create_domain still emits the matching free_domain. Promoting right after the event, rather than at commit_creds() time, avoids a race: on a successful thread-sync the sibling threads commit the new domain in lockstep before landlock_restrict_self() returns, so the shared domain may already have moved to LANDLOCK_LOG_RECORDED through a plain store, and a late promotion would race that store and could unbalance the domain allocation and deallocation audit records. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-10-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:23 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add create_domain and free_domain tracepoints Add a landlock_create_domain tracepoint emitted from landlock_restrict_self() after the new domain is created, so a consumer can correlate the source ruleset with the resulting domain. The flags-only path (ruleset_fd == -1) creates no domain and emits no event. Move the ruleset lock acquisition from landlock_merge_ruleset() to the caller so the lock is held across both the merge and the tracepoint emission, giving an eBPF program a consistent ruleset snapshot. Release it before the thread-sync: holding ruleset->lock across landlock_restrict_sibling_threads() would deadlock a sibling blocked on the same lock. The event therefore fires before the (rare) thread-sync failure path; when that path aborts the just-created domain, the matching free_domain event fires so the create/free pair stays balanced. Add a landlock_free_domain tracepoint that fires when a domain's hierarchy node is freed. The hierarchy node is the lifecycle boundary because it represents the domain's identity and outlives the domain's access masks, which may still be active in descendant domains. A domain freed without ever being committed to a credential was never visible to user space, so free_domain is suppressed for it. This is tracked by a new landlock_log_status value, LANDLOCK_LOG_UNCOMMITTED, which is also the zero value so a hierarchy whose initialization failed defaults to not observable. A hierarchy is born UNCOMMITTED and is promoted to LANDLOCK_LOG_PENDING (or LANDLOCK_LOG_DISABLED when logging is off) right after its create_domain event fires; a thread-sync failure does not reset it, so an aborted domain that already emitted create_domain still emits the matching free_domain. Promoting right after the event, rather than at commit_creds() time, avoids a race: on a successful thread-sync the sibling threads commit the new domain in lockstep before landlock_restrict_self() returns, so the shared domain may already have moved to LANDLOCK_LOG_RECORDED through a plain store, and a late promotion would race that store and could unbalance the domain allocation and deallocation audit records. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-10-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:23 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add create_domain and free_domain tracepoints Add a landlock_create_domain tracepoint emitted from landlock_restrict_self() after the new domain is created, so a consumer can correlate the source ruleset with the resulting domain. The flags-only path (ruleset_fd == -1) creates no domain and emits no event. Move the ruleset lock acquisition from landlock_merge_ruleset() to the caller so the lock is held across both the merge and the tracepoint emission, giving an eBPF program a consistent ruleset snapshot. Release it before the thread-sync: holding ruleset->lock across landlock_restrict_sibling_threads() would deadlock a sibling blocked on the same lock. The event therefore fires before the (rare) thread-sync failure path; when that path aborts the just-created domain, the matching free_domain event fires so the create/free pair stays balanced. Add a landlock_free_domain tracepoint that fires when a domain's hierarchy node is freed. The hierarchy node is the lifecycle boundary because it represents the domain's identity and outlives the domain's access masks, which may still be active in descendant domains. A domain freed without ever being committed to a credential was never visible to user space, so free_domain is suppressed for it. This is tracked by a new landlock_log_status value, LANDLOCK_LOG_UNCOMMITTED, which is also the zero value so a hierarchy whose initialization failed defaults to not observable. A hierarchy is born UNCOMMITTED and is promoted to LANDLOCK_LOG_PENDING (or LANDLOCK_LOG_DISABLED when logging is off) right after its create_domain event fires; a thread-sync failure does not reset it, so an aborted domain that already emitted create_domain still emits the matching free_domain. Promoting right after the event, rather than at commit_creds() time, avoids a race: on a successful thread-sync the sibling threads commit the new domain in lockstep before landlock_restrict_self() returns, so the shared domain may already have moved to LANDLOCK_LOG_RECORDED through a plain store, and a late promotion would race that store and could unbalance the domain allocation and deallocation audit records. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-10-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:23 +02:00
landlock: Split denial logging from audit into common framework Tracepoint emission requires the denial framework (layer identification, request validation) without depending on CONFIG_AUDIT. Separate the denial logging infrastructure from the audit-specific code by introducing a common log framework. Create CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, enabled by default when CONFIG_AUDIT is set; a following commit extends it to CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS when the first tracepoint consumer is added. Move the common framework (the request types, the layer identification and request validation, and the landlock_log_denial() and landlock_log_free_domain() entry points) into log.c and log.h, and keep the audit-specific record formatting in audit.c. log.o is built for CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG and audit.o for CONFIG_AUDIT, so the common framework is available to a tracepoints-only build. The entry points dispatch to no-op static inline audit stubs without CONFIG_AUDIT, so the call sites stay unconditional. Rename the former landlock_log_drop_domain() to landlock_log_free_domain() to match the landlock_free_domain tracepoint added in a following commit. landlock_log_denial() counts denials even without audit, so its declaration and no-op stub are guarded by CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, not CONFIG_AUDIT; a CONFIG_AUDIT guard would expose the stub and clash with log.c's definition in a tracepoints-only build. Widen the ID allocation (id.o and the landlock_init_id() / landlock_get_id_range() declarations) and the log-state representation (the domain_exec and log_subdomains_off credential fields, the landlock_hierarchy log fields, and the code that maintains them) from CONFIG_AUDIT to CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, so each field and its writer share one guard and are available to tracing without audit support. Widen the denial-path state that feeds the per-denial logging decision the same way, so the "logged" verdict is computed identically whether or not CONFIG_AUDIT is set. Widening fown_layer is what keeps the file-owner-signal path valid without audit: otherwise hook_file_send_sigiotask() would leave layer_plus_one at zero, tripping the is_valid_request() canary and dropping the LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL denial from tracing. The ruleset-level quiet_masks stays on no CONFIG guard: it is builder state validated and stored from user input, kept available so LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET flags are accepted and ignored, not rejected, when CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG is disabled. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-5-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:18 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add create_domain and free_domain tracepoints Add a landlock_create_domain tracepoint emitted from landlock_restrict_self() after the new domain is created, so a consumer can correlate the source ruleset with the resulting domain. The flags-only path (ruleset_fd == -1) creates no domain and emits no event. Move the ruleset lock acquisition from landlock_merge_ruleset() to the caller so the lock is held across both the merge and the tracepoint emission, giving an eBPF program a consistent ruleset snapshot. Release it before the thread-sync: holding ruleset->lock across landlock_restrict_sibling_threads() would deadlock a sibling blocked on the same lock. The event therefore fires before the (rare) thread-sync failure path; when that path aborts the just-created domain, the matching free_domain event fires so the create/free pair stays balanced. Add a landlock_free_domain tracepoint that fires when a domain's hierarchy node is freed. The hierarchy node is the lifecycle boundary because it represents the domain's identity and outlives the domain's access masks, which may still be active in descendant domains. A domain freed without ever being committed to a credential was never visible to user space, so free_domain is suppressed for it. This is tracked by a new landlock_log_status value, LANDLOCK_LOG_UNCOMMITTED, which is also the zero value so a hierarchy whose initialization failed defaults to not observable. A hierarchy is born UNCOMMITTED and is promoted to LANDLOCK_LOG_PENDING (or LANDLOCK_LOG_DISABLED when logging is off) right after its create_domain event fires; a thread-sync failure does not reset it, so an aborted domain that already emitted create_domain still emits the matching free_domain. Promoting right after the event, rather than at commit_creds() time, avoids a race: on a successful thread-sync the sibling threads commit the new domain in lockstep before landlock_restrict_self() returns, so the shared domain may already have moved to LANDLOCK_LOG_RECORDED through a plain store, and a late promotion would race that store and could unbalance the domain allocation and deallocation audit records. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-10-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:23 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add create_domain and free_domain tracepoints Add a landlock_create_domain tracepoint emitted from landlock_restrict_self() after the new domain is created, so a consumer can correlate the source ruleset with the resulting domain. The flags-only path (ruleset_fd == -1) creates no domain and emits no event. Move the ruleset lock acquisition from landlock_merge_ruleset() to the caller so the lock is held across both the merge and the tracepoint emission, giving an eBPF program a consistent ruleset snapshot. Release it before the thread-sync: holding ruleset->lock across landlock_restrict_sibling_threads() would deadlock a sibling blocked on the same lock. The event therefore fires before the (rare) thread-sync failure path; when that path aborts the just-created domain, the matching free_domain event fires so the create/free pair stays balanced. Add a landlock_free_domain tracepoint that fires when a domain's hierarchy node is freed. The hierarchy node is the lifecycle boundary because it represents the domain's identity and outlives the domain's access masks, which may still be active in descendant domains. A domain freed without ever being committed to a credential was never visible to user space, so free_domain is suppressed for it. This is tracked by a new landlock_log_status value, LANDLOCK_LOG_UNCOMMITTED, which is also the zero value so a hierarchy whose initialization failed defaults to not observable. A hierarchy is born UNCOMMITTED and is promoted to LANDLOCK_LOG_PENDING (or LANDLOCK_LOG_DISABLED when logging is off) right after its create_domain event fires; a thread-sync failure does not reset it, so an aborted domain that already emitted create_domain still emits the matching free_domain. Promoting right after the event, rather than at commit_creds() time, avoids a race: on a successful thread-sync the sibling threads commit the new domain in lockstep before landlock_restrict_self() returns, so the shared domain may already have moved to LANDLOCK_LOG_RECORDED through a plain store, and a late promotion would race that store and could unbalance the domain allocation and deallocation audit records. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-10-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:23 +02:00
landlock: Split denial logging from audit into common framework Tracepoint emission requires the denial framework (layer identification, request validation) without depending on CONFIG_AUDIT. Separate the denial logging infrastructure from the audit-specific code by introducing a common log framework. Create CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, enabled by default when CONFIG_AUDIT is set; a following commit extends it to CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS when the first tracepoint consumer is added. Move the common framework (the request types, the layer identification and request validation, and the landlock_log_denial() and landlock_log_free_domain() entry points) into log.c and log.h, and keep the audit-specific record formatting in audit.c. log.o is built for CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG and audit.o for CONFIG_AUDIT, so the common framework is available to a tracepoints-only build. The entry points dispatch to no-op static inline audit stubs without CONFIG_AUDIT, so the call sites stay unconditional. Rename the former landlock_log_drop_domain() to landlock_log_free_domain() to match the landlock_free_domain tracepoint added in a following commit. landlock_log_denial() counts denials even without audit, so its declaration and no-op stub are guarded by CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, not CONFIG_AUDIT; a CONFIG_AUDIT guard would expose the stub and clash with log.c's definition in a tracepoints-only build. Widen the ID allocation (id.o and the landlock_init_id() / landlock_get_id_range() declarations) and the log-state representation (the domain_exec and log_subdomains_off credential fields, the landlock_hierarchy log fields, and the code that maintains them) from CONFIG_AUDIT to CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, so each field and its writer share one guard and are available to tracing without audit support. Widen the denial-path state that feeds the per-denial logging decision the same way, so the "logged" verdict is computed identically whether or not CONFIG_AUDIT is set. Widening fown_layer is what keeps the file-owner-signal path valid without audit: otherwise hook_file_send_sigiotask() would leave layer_plus_one at zero, tripping the is_valid_request() canary and dropping the LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL denial from tracing. The ruleset-level quiet_masks stays on no CONFIG guard: it is builder state validated and stored from user input, kept available so LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET flags are accepted and ignored, not rejected, when CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG is disabled. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-5-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:18 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Split struct landlock_domain from struct landlock_ruleset Switch all domain users to the new struct landlock_domain type introduced by a previous commit, eliminating the conflation between mutable rulesets and immutable domains. landlock_merge_ruleset() now returns and allocates a struct landlock_domain, and the merge and inherit helpers move next to it; the former static insert_rule() is exported as landlock_store_rule() for its new caller across the translation-unit boundary. The merge destination is now a private struct landlock_domain still under construction (owned by the calling thread, not yet shared), so the merge and inherit helpers lock only the source ruleset: the previous lock of both destination and source collapses to a single mutex_lock(&src->lock). Rename the per-layer access-mask field from access_masks to handled_masks, naming it by the role it plays (the rights each layer handles) rather than by its type, paralleling the struct access_masks quiet_masks field. Drop the now domain-only fields (hierarchy, work_free, num_layers) from struct landlock_ruleset. The new struct landlock_domain field in cred.h pulls in domain.h, which includes audit.h, which previously included cred.h, forming an include cycle. Break it by having audit.h forward-declare the struct landlock_cred_security and struct landlock_hierarchy it uses instead of including cred.h. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-4-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:17 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Split denial logging from audit into common framework Tracepoint emission requires the denial framework (layer identification, request validation) without depending on CONFIG_AUDIT. Separate the denial logging infrastructure from the audit-specific code by introducing a common log framework. Create CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, enabled by default when CONFIG_AUDIT is set; a following commit extends it to CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS when the first tracepoint consumer is added. Move the common framework (the request types, the layer identification and request validation, and the landlock_log_denial() and landlock_log_free_domain() entry points) into log.c and log.h, and keep the audit-specific record formatting in audit.c. log.o is built for CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG and audit.o for CONFIG_AUDIT, so the common framework is available to a tracepoints-only build. The entry points dispatch to no-op static inline audit stubs without CONFIG_AUDIT, so the call sites stay unconditional. Rename the former landlock_log_drop_domain() to landlock_log_free_domain() to match the landlock_free_domain tracepoint added in a following commit. landlock_log_denial() counts denials even without audit, so its declaration and no-op stub are guarded by CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, not CONFIG_AUDIT; a CONFIG_AUDIT guard would expose the stub and clash with log.c's definition in a tracepoints-only build. Widen the ID allocation (id.o and the landlock_init_id() / landlock_get_id_range() declarations) and the log-state representation (the domain_exec and log_subdomains_off credential fields, the landlock_hierarchy log fields, and the code that maintains them) from CONFIG_AUDIT to CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, so each field and its writer share one guard and are available to tracing without audit support. Widen the denial-path state that feeds the per-denial logging decision the same way, so the "logged" verdict is computed identically whether or not CONFIG_AUDIT is set. Widening fown_layer is what keeps the file-owner-signal path valid without audit: otherwise hook_file_send_sigiotask() would leave layer_plus_one at zero, tripping the is_valid_request() canary and dropping the LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL denial from tracing. The ruleset-level quiet_masks stays on no CONFIG guard: it is builder state validated and stored from user input, kept available so LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET flags are accepted and ignored, not rejected, when CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG is disabled. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-5-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:18 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Split denial logging from audit into common framework Tracepoint emission requires the denial framework (layer identification, request validation) without depending on CONFIG_AUDIT. Separate the denial logging infrastructure from the audit-specific code by introducing a common log framework. Create CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, enabled by default when CONFIG_AUDIT is set; a following commit extends it to CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS when the first tracepoint consumer is added. Move the common framework (the request types, the layer identification and request validation, and the landlock_log_denial() and landlock_log_free_domain() entry points) into log.c and log.h, and keep the audit-specific record formatting in audit.c. log.o is built for CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG and audit.o for CONFIG_AUDIT, so the common framework is available to a tracepoints-only build. The entry points dispatch to no-op static inline audit stubs without CONFIG_AUDIT, so the call sites stay unconditional. Rename the former landlock_log_drop_domain() to landlock_log_free_domain() to match the landlock_free_domain tracepoint added in a following commit. landlock_log_denial() counts denials even without audit, so its declaration and no-op stub are guarded by CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, not CONFIG_AUDIT; a CONFIG_AUDIT guard would expose the stub and clash with log.c's definition in a tracepoints-only build. Widen the ID allocation (id.o and the landlock_init_id() / landlock_get_id_range() declarations) and the log-state representation (the domain_exec and log_subdomains_off credential fields, the landlock_hierarchy log fields, and the code that maintains them) from CONFIG_AUDIT to CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG, so each field and its writer share one guard and are available to tracing without audit support. Widen the denial-path state that feeds the per-denial logging decision the same way, so the "logged" verdict is computed identically whether or not CONFIG_AUDIT is set. Widening fown_layer is what keeps the file-owner-signal path valid without audit: otherwise hook_file_send_sigiotask() would leave layer_plus_one at zero, tripping the is_valid_request() canary and dropping the LANDLOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL denial from tracing. The ruleset-level quiet_masks stays on no CONFIG guard: it is builder state validated and stored from user input, kept available so LANDLOCK_ADD_RULE_QUIET flags are accepted and ignored, not rejected, when CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_LOG is disabled. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-5-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:18 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Add a landlock_restrict_self(2) flag to set the no_new_privs attribute of the calling thread only after enforcement of the ruleset: no_new_privs is set if and only if the call succeeds. This removes the need for a prior prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call and guarantees that a failed enforcement leaves the attribute unchanged. Because no_new_privs is set by the call itself, the no_new_privs / CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement of landlock_restrict_self(2) is fulfilled by construction, and the related EPERM check is skipped. Unlike LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF, this flag always requires a valid ruleset: with a ruleset_fd of -1, such a call would be nothing more than a Landlock-flavored prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, and there is no valid use case for setting no_new_privs (possibly with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC) without also enforcing Landlock restrictions. Rejecting these calls also keeps the option of giving them a meaning later. The attribute is only set past the last point of failure, just before committing the new credentials. When combined with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC, no_new_privs is set on the sibling threads as well, in their commit phase, with the same ordering. Bump the Landlock ABI version to 11, and include the minimal related test changes to keep the tests bisectable. Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260809212459.2427878-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-09 17:24:59 -04:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add create_domain and free_domain tracepoints Add a landlock_create_domain tracepoint emitted from landlock_restrict_self() after the new domain is created, so a consumer can correlate the source ruleset with the resulting domain. The flags-only path (ruleset_fd == -1) creates no domain and emits no event. Move the ruleset lock acquisition from landlock_merge_ruleset() to the caller so the lock is held across both the merge and the tracepoint emission, giving an eBPF program a consistent ruleset snapshot. Release it before the thread-sync: holding ruleset->lock across landlock_restrict_sibling_threads() would deadlock a sibling blocked on the same lock. The event therefore fires before the (rare) thread-sync failure path; when that path aborts the just-created domain, the matching free_domain event fires so the create/free pair stays balanced. Add a landlock_free_domain tracepoint that fires when a domain's hierarchy node is freed. The hierarchy node is the lifecycle boundary because it represents the domain's identity and outlives the domain's access masks, which may still be active in descendant domains. A domain freed without ever being committed to a credential was never visible to user space, so free_domain is suppressed for it. This is tracked by a new landlock_log_status value, LANDLOCK_LOG_UNCOMMITTED, which is also the zero value so a hierarchy whose initialization failed defaults to not observable. A hierarchy is born UNCOMMITTED and is promoted to LANDLOCK_LOG_PENDING (or LANDLOCK_LOG_DISABLED when logging is off) right after its create_domain event fires; a thread-sync failure does not reset it, so an aborted domain that already emitted create_domain still emits the matching free_domain. Promoting right after the event, rather than at commit_creds() time, avoids a race: on a successful thread-sync the sibling threads commit the new domain in lockstep before landlock_restrict_self() returns, so the shared domain may already have moved to LANDLOCK_LOG_RECORDED through a plain store, and a late promotion would race that store and could unbalance the domain allocation and deallocation audit records. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-10-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:23 +02:00
landlock: Multithreading support for landlock_restrict_self() Introduce the LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC flag. With this flag, a given Landlock ruleset is applied to all threads of the calling process, instead of only the current one. Without this flag, multithreaded userspace programs currently resort to using the nptl(7)/libpsx hack for multithreaded policy enforcement, which is also used by libcap and for setuid(2). Using this userspace-based scheme, the threads of a process enforce the same Landlock policy, but the resulting Landlock domains are still separate. The domains being separate causes multiple problems: * When using Landlock's "scoped" access rights, the domain identity is used to determine whether an operation is permitted. As a result, when using LANLDOCK_SCOPE_SIGNAL, signaling between sibling threads stops working. This is a problem for programming languages and frameworks which are inherently multithreaded (e.g. Go). * In audit logging, the domains of separate threads in a process will get logged with different domain IDs, even when they are based on the same ruleset FD, which might confuse users. Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127115136.3064948-2-gnoack@google.com [mic: Fix restrict_self_flags test, clean up Makefile, allign comments, reduce local variable scope, add missing includes] Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/2 Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2025-11-27 12:51:34 +01:00
landlock: Add LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS Add a landlock_restrict_self(2) flag to set the no_new_privs attribute of the calling thread only after enforcement of the ruleset: no_new_privs is set if and only if the call succeeds. This removes the need for a prior prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call and guarantees that a failed enforcement leaves the attribute unchanged. Because no_new_privs is set by the call itself, the no_new_privs / CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement of landlock_restrict_self(2) is fulfilled by construction, and the related EPERM check is skipped. Unlike LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF, this flag always requires a valid ruleset: with a ruleset_fd of -1, such a call would be nothing more than a Landlock-flavored prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, and there is no valid use case for setting no_new_privs (possibly with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC) without also enforcing Landlock restrictions. Rejecting these calls also keeps the option of giving them a meaning later. The attribute is only set past the last point of failure, just before committing the new credentials. When combined with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC, no_new_privs is set on the sibling threads as well, in their commit phase, with the same ordering. Bump the Landlock ABI version to 11, and include the minimal related test changes to keep the tests bisectable. Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260809212459.2427878-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-09 17:24:59 -04:00
landlock: Add landlock_enforce_domain tracepoint The landlock_create_domain event records that a domain was created, once, before thread-sync. It cannot tell which threads end up enforcing it: a successful landlock_restrict_self(2) with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC applies the domain to the caller and every eligible sibling. Creation (the operation) and enforcement (the per-thread outcome) are distinct. Add landlock_enforce_domain(domain, complete, process_wide), emitted once per thread the domain is applied to, strictly after that thread's commit_creds(), so it fires only for a thread that is enforcing the domain, never speculatively; an aborted operation emits none. The lifecycle now reads create -> enforce* -> free. The two booleans name properties, not the implementation: - complete: marks the single event that concludes the operation. It names the outcome, the set is now enforced, not which thread finishes, which the contract leaves unspecified. - process_wide: means every eligible thread of the process is covered. It is set race-free by either establishing path, thread-sync or a single-threaded process, so complete && process_wide is the whole-process-enforced guarantee. The requesting thread and source ruleset are not repeated here: they are on create_domain (joined via domain->hierarchy->id) and on the immutable domain->hierarchy->details. Source ruleset means the ruleset_id and ruleset_version recorded on create_domain, not the ruleset object, which the caller may close before enforcement. Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811094338.288094-11-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
2026-08-11 11:43:24 +02:00
landlock: Add syscall implementations These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_restrict_self(2): Enforces a ruleset on the calling thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace. All these syscalls have a "flags" argument (not currently used) to enable extensibility. Here are the motivations for these new syscalls: * A sandboxed process may not have access to file systems, including /dev, /sys or /proc, but it should still be able to add more restrictions to itself. * Neither prctl(2) nor seccomp(2) (which was used in a previous version) fit well with the current definition of a Landlock security policy. All passed structs (attributes) are checked at build time to ensure that they don't contain holes and that they are aligned the same way for each architecture. See the user and kernel documentation for more details (provided by a following commit): * Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst * Documentation/security/landlock.rst Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422154123.13086-9-mic@digikod.net Signed-off-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
2021-04-22 17:41:18 +02:00