Btrfs: send, don't error in the presence of subvols/snapshots

Browse source

commit 1af56070e3 upstream.

If we are doing an incremental send and the base snapshot has a
directory with name X that doesn't exist anymore in the second
snapshot and a new subvolume/snapshot exists in the second snapshot
that has the same name as the directory (name X), the incremental
send would fail with -ENOENT error. This is because it attempts
to lookup for an inode with a number matching the objectid of a
root, which doesn't exist.

Steps to reproduce:

    mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    mkdir /mnt/testdir
    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1

    rmdir /mnt/testdir
    btrfs subvolume create /mnt/testdir
    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2

    btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data

A test case for xfstests follows.

Reported-by: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

...

This commit is contained in:

Filipe Manana 2014-05-25 04:49:24 +01:00 • committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

parent 1b524a36f1

commit 1a7fc2e61a

1 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4

fs/btrfs/send.c

View file