f2fs: fix to check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()

Browse source

[ Upstream commit 956fa1ddc1 ]

Let's check return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block() in do_recover_data()
rather than letting it fails silently.

Also refactoring check condition on return value of f2fs_reserve_new_block()
as below:
- trigger f2fs_bug_on() only for ENOSPC case;
- use do-while statement to avoid redundant codes;

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

...

This commit is contained in:

Chao Yu 2023-11-16 14:25:56 +08:00 • committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

parent 9916fdd8a2

commit 2a7b12d470

1 changed files with 17 additions and 6 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

23

fs/f2fs/recovery.c

View file