erofs: use feature_incompat rather than requirements

Browse source

As Christoph said [1], "This is only cosmetic, why
not stick to feature_compat and feature_incompat?"

In my thought, requirements means "incompatible"
instead of "feature" though.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125109.GA9826@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-7-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

...

This commit is contained in:

Gao Xiang 2019-09-04 10:08:53 +08:00 • committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

parent c39747f770

commit 426a930891

4 changed files with 14 additions and 13 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3

fs/erofs/decompressor.c

View file

12

fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h

View file

2

fs/erofs/internal.h

View file

10

fs/erofs/super.c

View file