Btrfs: get rid of btrfs_symlink_aops

Browse source

The only aops we define for symlinks are identical to the aops for
regular files. This has been the case since symlink support was added in
commit 2b8d99a723 ("Btrfs: symlinks and hard links"). As far as I can
tell, there wasn't a good reason to have separate aops then, and there
isn't now, so let's just do what most other filesystems do and reuse the
same structure.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

...

This commit is contained in:

Omar Sandoval 2018-09-24 15:16:55 -07:00 • committed by David Sterba

parent 7703bdd8d2

commit 4779cc0424

1 changed files with 2 additions and 10 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12

fs/btrfs/inode.c

View file