s390/bpf: Do not write tail call counter into helper and kfunc frames

Browse source

[ Upstream commit eada40e057 ]

Only BPF functions make use of the tail call counter; helpers and
kfuncs ignore and most likely also clobber it. Writing it into these
functions' frames is pointless and misleading, so do not do it.

Fixes: dd691e847d ("s390/bpf: Implement bpf_jit_supports_subprog_tailcalls()")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250813121016.163375-2-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

...

This commit is contained in:

Ilya Leoshkevich 2025-08-13 14:06:28 +02:00 • committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

parent c0e4490cbf

commit 49aba49947

1 changed files with 12 additions and 4 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16

arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c

View file