ufs: the offsets ufs_block_to_path() puts into array are not sector_t

type makes no sense - those are indices in block number arrays, not
block numbers.  And no, UFS is not likely to grow indirect blocks with
4Gpointers in them...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Al Viro 2015-06-04 14:13:14 -04:00
commit 4e3911f3d7