ebpf: move CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL-only function declarations

Browse source

Masami noted that it would be better to hide the remaining CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL-only
function declarations within the BPF header ifdef, w/o else path dummy alternatives
since these functions are not supposed to have a user outside of CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL.

Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Reference: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.api/8658
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

...

This commit is contained in:

Daniel Borkmann 2015-03-02 15:21:55 +01:00 • committed by David S. Miller

parent 77f0379fa8

commit 61e021f3b8

1 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

18

include/linux/bpf.h

View file