staging: vchiq_arm: tidy up service function naming

Browse source

During a recent review Dan Carpenter reported that the function naming of
(un)lock_service is misleading. They are like wrapper around kref_get /
kref_put and don't have anything to do with locking. So use a name which
represent more the actual behavior. Btw add the vchiq prefix to avoid
possible name conflicts.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1622735405-9980-12-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

...

This commit is contained in:

Stefan Wahren 2021-06-03 17:50:00 +02:00 • committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

parent 75f0a4f2c1

commit 68a485965a

3 changed files with 41 additions and 41 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

32

drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c

View file

46

drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c

View file

4

drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h

View file