btrfs: extent-tree: Refactor add_pinned_bytes() to add|sub_pinned_bytes()

Browse source

Instead of using @sign to determine whether we're adding or subtracting.
Even it only has 3 callers, it's still (and in fact already caused
problem in the past) confusing to use.

Refactor add_pinned_bytes() to add_pinned_bytes() and sub_pinned_bytes()
to explicitly show what we're doing.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

...

This commit is contained in:

Qu Wenruo 2019-05-15 07:33:48 +08:00 • committed by David Sterba

parent 6fbc7275c7

commit 78192442d3

1 changed files with 27 additions and 16 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

43

fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c

View file