drm/i915: Don't rely that 2 VDSC engines are always enough for pixel rate

Browse source

We are currently having FIFO underruns happening for kms_dsc test case,
problem is that, we check if curreny cdclk is >= pixel rate only if
there is a single VDSC engine enabled(i.e dsc_split=false) however if
we happen to have 2 VDSC engines enabled, we just kinda rely that this
would be automatically enough.
However pixel rate can be even >= than VDSC clock(cdclk) * 2, so in that
case even with 2 VDSC engines enabled, we still need to tweak it up.
So lets compare pixel rate with cdclk * VDSC engine count and
check if it still requires bumping up.
Previously we had to bump up CDCLK many times for similar reasons.

v2: - Use new intel_dsc_get_num_vdsc_instances to determine number of VDSC
      engines, instead of slice count(Ankit Nautiyal)
v3: - s/u8/int/ (Jani Nikula)
v4: - Remove slice count mentions(Ankit Nautiyal)
    - Use DIV_ROUND_UP in order to make sure that resulting CDCLK would
      be always >= than required, after division(Ankit Nautiyal)

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230704131758.14024-3-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com

...

This commit is contained in:

Stanislav Lisovskiy 2023-07-04 16:17:58 +03:00

parent 08a3a79ef8

commit 8290bcee57

1 changed files with 10 additions and 2 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c

View file