btrfs: be more explicit about allowed flush states

Browse source

For FLUSH_LIMIT flushers we really can only allocate chunks and flush
delayed inode items, everything else is problematic.  I added a bunch of
new states and it lead to weirdness in the FLUSH_LIMIT case because I
forgot about how it worked.  So instead explicitly declare the states
that are ok for flushing with FLUSH_LIMIT and use that for our state
machine.  Then as we add new things that are safe we can just add them
to this list.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

...

This commit is contained in:

Josef Bacik 2018-11-21 14:03:12 -05:00 • committed by David Sterba

parent 5df1136363

commit 8a1bbe1d5c

1 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

22

fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c

View file