drm/i915: Use unsigned for overflow checks in execbuf

Browse source

There's actually no real risk since we already check for stricter
constraints earlier (using UINT_MAX / sizeof (struct
drm_i915_gem_exec_object2) as the limit). But in eb_create we use
signed integers, which steals a factor of 2. Luckily struct
drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 for this to not matter.

Still, be consistent and use unsigned integers.

Similar use unsinged integers when checking for overflows in the
relocation entry processing.

I've also added a new subtests to igt/gem_reloc_overflow to also
test for overflowing args->buffer_count values.

v2: Give the variables again tighter scope to make it clear that the
computation is purely local and doesn't leak out to the 2nd block.
Requested by Chris Wilson.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

...

This commit is contained in:

Daniel Vetter 2013-09-19 14:00:11 +02:00

parent 955382f389

commit b205ca5721

1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c

View file