mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/
synced 2026-11-10 20:48:12 +00:00
bpf: Fix packet range of pointers sharing an id
Since commit022ac07508("bpf: use reg->var_off instead of reg->off for pointers"), find_good_pkt_pointers() sets the range of all packet pointers sharing an id from the umax of the compared pointer, and check_packet_access() requires umax + off + size <= range. That assumes the umax of two such pointers differ by exactly their constant distance. reg_bounds_sync() breaks it when var_off tightens one umax and not the other: r4 &= 0x38 if r4 > 50 goto exit ; umax 50, var_off (0x0; 0x38) r5 = pkt + r4 ; umax 50 r6 = r5 r6 += 8 ; umax 56, not 58 Comparing r6 with pkt_end sets the range to 56, and the valid 8-byte load at r5 is rejected (50 + 8 > 56). Comparing r5 sets it to 50, and the out-of-bounds 1-byte load at r6 - 7, i.e. r5 + 1, is accepted (56 - 7 + 1 <= 50). Don't call reg_bounds_sync() on a packet pointer that keeps its id (a constant was added or subtracted) or its range (an unknown non-negative value was subtracted), so that var_off cannot tighten its umax. Only update the 32-bit bounds from var_off: reg_bounds_sanity_check() wants them constant when the lower half of var_off is, e.g. for pkt + 8. This relies on nothing else changing the 64-bit bounds of a packet pointer, which holds today. var_off of such a pointer is no longer narrowed by its bounds. Adjust three verifier_align expectations; the low bits, which the alignment checks use, don't change. veristat on the selftests shows no verdict changes and +0.8% insns in test_cls_redirect_subprogs. Fixes:022ac07508("bpf: use reg->var_off instead of reg->off for pointers") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20261001145255.855630-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
564b7e8e09
commit
b88822d258
2 changed files with 12 additions and 4 deletions
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue