btrfs: use next_state instead of rb_next where we can

Browse source

We can simplify a lot of these functions where we have to cycle through
extent_state's by simply using next_state() instead of rb_next().  In
many spots this allows us to do things like

while (state) {
	/* whatever */
	state = next_state(state);
}

instead of

while (1) {
	state = rb_entry(n, struct extent_state, rb_node);
	n = rb_next(n);
	if (!n)
		break;
}

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

...

This commit is contained in:

Josef Bacik 2022-09-09 17:53:33 -04:00 • committed by David Sterba

parent 071d19f513

commit ccaeff9290

1 changed files with 24 additions and 33 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

57

fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c

View file