s390/uaccess: normalize order of parameters of indirect uaccess function calls

Browse source

For some unknown reason the indirect uaccess functions on s390 implement a
different parameter order than what is usual.

e.g.:

unsigned long copy_to_user(void *to, const void *from, unsigned long n);
vs.
size_t (*copy_to_user)(size_t n, void __user * to, const void *from);

Let's get rid of this confusing parameter reordering.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>

...

This commit is contained in:

Heiko Carstens 2014-01-22 14:49:30 +01:00 • committed by Martin Schwidefsky

parent 137a14f434

commit cfa785e623

3 changed files with 54 additions and 54 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

54

arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h

View file

20

arch/s390/lib/uaccess_mvcos.c

View file

34

arch/s390/lib/uaccess_pt.c

View file