drm: Try to document legacy DPMS uapi a bit better

Browse source

Due to inconsistency of how various legacy drivers implemented DPMS
the DPMS uabi has a lot of quirks. Atomic standardizes this, but
drivers using the DPMS support can't rely on that since legacy drivers
still exist.

Laurent asked for this.

v2:
Improve commit message and explain that DPMS doesn't really exist for
the atomic ioctl (it's "ACTIVE" on the CRTC instead).

Text polish from Eric's review.

Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170920225957.16278-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch

...

This commit is contained in:

Daniel Vetter 2017-09-21 00:59:57 +02:00

parent 6bf2e0324b

commit d0d1aee5f7

1 changed files with 23 additions and 0 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

23

drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c

View file