drm/i915: don't make assumptions about intel_wakeref_t type

Browse source

intel_wakeref_t is supposed to be a mostly opaque cookie to its
users. It should only be checked for being non-zero and set to
zero. Debug logging its actual value is meaningless. Switch to just
debug logging whether the async_put_wakeref is non-zero.

The issue dates back to much earlier than
commit b49e894c3f ("drm/i915: Replace custom intel runtime_pm tracker
with ref_tracker library"), but this is the one that brought about a
build failure due to the printf format.

Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240102111222.2db11208@canb.auug.org.au
Fixes: b49e894c3f ("drm/i915: Replace custom intel runtime_pm tracker with ref_tracker library")
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240104164600.783371-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

...

This commit is contained in:

Jani Nikula 2024-01-04 18:46:00 +02:00

parent 835e4d9bb3

commit de06b42edc

1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c

View file