x86, NUMA: Trim numa meminfo with max_pfn in a separate loop

Browse source

During testing 32bit numa unifying code from tj, found one system with
more than 64g fails to use numa.  It turns out we do not trim numa
meminfo correctly against max_pfn in case start address of a node is
higher than 64GiB.  Bug fix made it to tip tree.

This patch moves the checking and trimming to a separate loop.  So we
don't need to compare low/high in following merge loops.  It makes the
code more readable.

Also it makes the node merge printouts less strange.  On a 512GiB numa
system with 32bit,

before:
> NUMA: Node 0 [0,a0000) + [100000,80000000) -> [0,80000000)
> NUMA: Node 0 [0,80000000) + [100000000,1080000000) -> [0,1000000000)

after:
> NUMA: Node 0 [0,a0000) + [100000,80000000) -> [0,80000000)
> NUMA: Node 0 [0,80000000) + [100000000,1000000000) -> [0,1000000000)

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
[Updated patch description and comment slightly.]
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

...

This commit is contained in:

Yinghai Lu 2011-05-02 17:24:49 +02:00 • committed by Tejun Heo

parent a56bca80db

commit e5a10c1bd1

1 changed files with 10 additions and 5 deletions

Show all changes Ignore whitespace when comparing lines Ignore changes in amount of whitespace Ignore changes in whitespace at EOL

Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

15

arch/x86/mm/numa.c

View file