mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/
synced 2026-10-20 19:23:40 +00:00
net: dsa: lantiq_gswip: move gswip_add_single_port_br() call to port_setup()
[ Upstream commitc0054b25e2] A port added to a "single port bridge" operates as standalone, and this is mutually exclusive to being part of a Linux bridge. In fact, gswip_port_bridge_join() calls gswip_add_single_port_br() with add=false, i.e. removes the port from the "single port bridge" to enable autonomous forwarding. The blamed commit seems to have incorrectly thought that ds->ops->port_enable() is called one time per port, during the setup phase of the switch. However, it is actually called during the ndo_open() implementation of DSA user ports, which is to say that this sequence of events: 1. ip link set swp0 down 2. ip link add br0 type bridge 3. ip link set swp0 master br0 4. ip link set swp0 up would cause swp0 to join back the "single port bridge" which step 3 had just removed it from. The correct DSA hook for one-time actions per port at switch init time is ds->ops->port_setup(). This is what seems to match the coder's intention; also see the comment at the beginning of the file: * At the initialization the driver allocates one bridge table entry for ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * each switch port which is used when the port is used without an * explicit bridge. Fixes:8206e0ce96("net: dsa: lantiq: Add VLAN unaware bridge offloading") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250918072142.894692-2-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Tested-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b9010dba5f
commit
e8687ab9c8
1 changed files with 14 additions and 4 deletions
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue