mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/
synced 2026-10-16 22:39:48 +00:00
KVM: x86/mmu: Zap defunct roots via asynchronous worker
Zap defunct roots, a.k.a. roots that have been invalidated after their last reference was initially dropped, asynchronously via the existing work queue instead of forcing the work upon the unfortunate task that happened to drop the last reference. If a vCPU task drops the last reference, the vCPU is effectively blocked by the host for the entire duration of the zap. If the root being zapped happens be fully populated with 4kb leaf SPTEs, e.g. due to dirty logging being active, the zap can take several hundred seconds. Unsurprisingly, most guests are unhappy if a vCPU disappears for hundreds of seconds. E.g. running a synthetic selftest that triggers a vCPU root zap with ~64tb of guest memory and 4kb SPTEs blocks the vCPU for 900+ seconds. Offloading the zap to a worker drops the block time to <100ms. There is an important nuance to this change. If the same work item was queued twice before the work function has run, it would only execute once and one reference would be leaked. Therefore, now that queueing and flushing items is not anymore protected by kvm->slots_lock, kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots() has to check root->role.invalid and skip already invalid roots. On the other hand, kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() must return only after those skipped roots have been zapped as well. These two requirements can be satisfied only if _all_ places that change invalid to true now schedule the worker before releasing the mmu_lock. There are just two, kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root() and kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots(). Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com> Message-Id: <20220226001546.360188-23-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1b6043e8e5
commit
efd995dae5
1 changed files with 11 additions and 9 deletions
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue