- Fix typos in documentation (josh ziegler)
- Use FIELD_MODIFY() instead of open-coding it (Hans Zhang)
* pci/misc:
PCI: Use FIELD_MODIFY() instead of open-coding it
Documentation: PCI: Fix typos
pci_restore_rebar_state() uses the Resizable BAR Control register to decide
how many BARs to restore (nbars) and which BAR each iteration addresses
(bar_idx).
When a device does not respond, config reads typically return
PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0). Both fields are 3 bits wide, so nbars and bar_idx
both evaluate to 7, past the spec's valid ranges for both fields.
pci_resource_n() then returns an unrelated resource slot, whose size is
used to derive a nonsensical value written back to the Resizable BAR
Control register.
Bail out if any Resizable BAR Control read returns PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE. No
further BARs are touched, which is safe because a config read that returns
PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE indicates the device is unreachable and restoration is
pointless.
Fixes: d3252ace0b ("PCI: Restore resized BAR state on resume")
Signed-off-by: Marco Nenciarini <mnencia@kcore.it>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/666cac19b5daa0ab0e0ab64454e76b4d24465dbd.1776429882.git.mnencia@kcore.it
The commit 337b1b566d ("PCI: Fix restoring BARs on BAR resize rollback
path") changed BAR resize to layer rebar code and resource setup/restore
code cleanly. Unfortunately, it did not consider how the value of the BAR
Size field impacts the read-only bits in the Base Address Register (PCIe7
spec, sec. 7.8.6.3). That is, it very much matters in which order the BAR
Size and Base Address Register are restored.
Post-337b1b566db0 ("PCI: Fix restoring BARs on BAR resize rollback path")
during BAR resize rollback, pci_do_resource_release_and_resize() attempts
to restore the old address to the BAR that was resized, but it can fail to
setup the address correctly if the address has low bits set that collide
with the bits that are still read-only. As a result, kernel's resource and
BAR will be out-of-sync.
Fix this by restoring BAR Size before rolling back the resource changes and
restoring the BAR.
Fixes: 337b1b566d ("PCI: Fix restoring BARs on BAR resize rollback path")
Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aW_w1oFQCzUxGYtu@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260121131417.9582-3-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
According to Dan Carpenter, smatch detects issue with size parameter given
to pci_rebar_size_supported():
drivers/pci/rebar.c:142 pci_rebar_size_supported()
error: undefined (user controlled) shift '(((1))) << size'
The problem is this call tree, which uses the 'size' from the user to shift
in BIT() without validating it:
__resource_resize_store # takes 'buf' from user sysfs write
kstrtoul(buf, 0, &size) # converts to unsigned long
pci_resize_resource # truncates to int
pci_rebar_size_supported # BIT(size) without validation
There could be similar problems also with pci_resize_resource() parameter
values coming from drivers.
Add 'size' validation to pci_rebar_size_supported().
There seems to be no SZ_128T prior to this so add one to be able to specify
the largest size supported by the kernel (PCIe r7.0 spec already defines
sizes even beyond 128TB but kernel does not yet support them).
The issue looks older than the introduction of pci_rebar_size_supported()
by bb1fabd0d9 ("PCI: Add pci_rebar_size_supported() helper").
It would be also nice to convert 'size' unsigned too everywhere, maybe even
u8 but that is left as further work.
Fixes: 8bb705e3e7 ("PCI: Add pci_resize_resource() for resizing BARs")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/aSA1WiRG3RuhqZMY@stanley.mountain/
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
[bhelgaas: commit log, add report URL]
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251124153740.2995-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
PCIe r7.0, sec 7.8.6, defines resizable BAR sizes beyond the currently
supported maximum of 128TB, which will require more than u32 to store the
entire bitmask.
Convert Resizable BAR related functions to use u64 bitmask for BAR sizes to
make the typing more future-proof.
The support for the larger BAR sizes themselves is not added at this point.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113180053.27944-12-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Add pci_rebar_get_max_size() to allow simplifying code that wants to know
the maximum possible size for a Resizable BAR.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113180053.27944-9-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Many callers of pci_rebar_get_possible_sizes() are interested in finding
out if a particular encoded BAR Size (PCIe r7.0, sec 7.8.6.3) is supported
by the particular BAR.
Add pci_rebar_size_supported() into PCI core to make it easy for the
drivers to determine if the BAR size is supported or not.
Use the new function in pci_resize_resource() and in
pci_iov_vf_bar_set_size().
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113180053.27944-6-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Fix the copy-pasted errors in the Resizable BAR handling functions kernel
doc and generally improve wording choices.
Fix the formatting errors of the Return: line.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113180053.27944-5-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
pci_rebar_size_to_bytes() is in drivers/pci/pci.h but would be useful for
endpoint drivers as well.
Move the function to rebar.c and export it.
In addition, convert the literal to where the number comes from
(PCI_REBAR_MIN_SIZE).
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113180053.27944-4-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Move pci_rebar_bytes_to_size() from include/linux/pci.h to rebar.c as it
does not look very trivial and is not expected to be performance critical.
Convert literals to use a newly added PCI_REBAR_MIN_SIZE define.
Also add kernel doc for the function as the function is exported.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <mjruhl@habana.ai>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113180053.27944-3-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
For lack of a better place to put it, Resizable BAR code has been placed
inside pci.c and setup-res.c that do not use it for anything. Upcoming
changes are going to add more Resizable BAR related functions, increasing
the code size.
As pci.c is huge as is, move the Resizable BAR related code and the BAR
resize code from setup-res.c to rebar.c.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113180053.27944-2-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
