When a CPU comes online, it may bring a newly accessible MSC with
it. Only the default partid has its value reset by hardware, and
even then the MSC might not have been reset since its config was
previously dirtied. e.g. Kexec.
Any in-use partid must have its configuration restored, or reset.
In-use partids may be held in caches and evicted later.
MSC are also reset when CPUs are taken offline to cover cases where
firmware doesn't reset the MSC over reboot using UEFI, or kexec
where there is no firmware involvement.
If the configuration for a RIS has not been touched since it was
brought online, it does not need resetting again.
To reset, write the maximum values for all discovered controls.
CC: Rohit Mathew <Rohit.Mathew@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To make a decision about whether to expose an mpam class as
a resctrl resource we need to know its overall supported
features and properties.
Once we've probed all the resources, we can walk the tree
and produce overall values by merging the bitmaps. This
eliminates features that are only supported by some MSC
that make up a component or class.
If bitmap properties are mismatched within a component we
cannot support the mismatched feature.
Care has to be taken as vMSC may hold mismatched RIS.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Expand the probing support with the control and monitor types
we can use with resctrl.
CC: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The MSC MON_SEL register needs to be accessed from hardirq for the overflow
interrupt, and when taking an IPI to access these registers on platforms
where MSC are not accessible from every CPU. This makes an irqsave
spinlock the obvious lock to protect these registers. On systems with SCMI
or PCC mailboxes it must be able to sleep, meaning a mutex must be used.
The SCMI or PCC platforms can't support an overflow interrupt, and
can't access the registers from hardirq context.
Clearly these two can't exist for one MSC at the same time.
Add helpers for the MON_SEL locking. For now, use a irqsave spinlock and
only support 'real' MMIO platforms.
In the future this lock will be split in two allowing SCMI/PCC platforms
to take a mutex. Because there are contexts where the SCMI/PCC platforms
can't make an access, mpam_mon_sel_lock() needs to be able to fail. Do
this now, so that all the error handling on these paths is present. This
allows the relevant paths to fail if they are needed on a platform where
this isn't possible, instead of having to make explicit checks of the
interface type.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
CPUs can generate traffic with a range of PARTID and PMG values,
but each MSC may also have its own maximum size for these fields.
Before MPAM can be used, the driver needs to probe each RIS on
each MSC, to find the system-wide smallest value that can be used.
The limits from requestors (e.g. CPUs) also need taking into account.
While doing this, RIS entries that firmware didn't describe are created
under MPAM_CLASS_UNKNOWN.
This adds the low level MSC write accessors.
While we're here, implement the mpam_register_requestor() call
for the arch code to register the CPU limits. Future callers of this
will tell us about the SMMU and ITS.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Because an MSC can only by accessed from the CPUs in its cpu-affinity
set we need to be running on one of those CPUs to probe the MSC
hardware.
Do this work in the cpuhp callback. Probing the hardware will only
happen before MPAM is enabled, walk all the MSCs and probe those we can
reach that haven't already been probed as each CPU's online call is made.
This adds the low-level MSC register read accessors.
Once all MSCs reported by the firmware have been probed from a CPU in
their respective cpu-affinity set, the probe-time cpuhp callbacks are
replaced. The replacement callbacks will ultimately need to handle
save/restore of the runtime MSC state across power transitions, but for
now there is nothing to do in them: so do nothing.
The architecture's context switch code will be enabled by a static-key,
this can be set by mpam_enable(), but must be done from process context,
not a cpuhp callback because both take the cpuhp lock.
Whenever a new MSC has been probed, the mpam_enable() work is scheduled
to test if all the MSCs have been probed. If probing fails, mpam_disable()
is scheduled to unregister the cpuhp callbacks and free memory.
CC: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzerc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Memory Partitioning and Monitoring (MPAM) has memory mapped devices
(MSCs) with an identity/configuration page.
Add the definitions for these registers as offset within the page(s).
Link: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ihi0099/aa/
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
An MSC is a container of resources, each identified by their RIS index.
Some RIS are described by firmware to provide their position in the system.
Others are discovered when the driver probes the hardware.
To configure a resource it needs to be found by its class, e.g. 'L2'.
There are two kinds of grouping, a class is a set of components, which
are visible to user-space as there are likely to be multiple instances
of the L2 cache. (e.g. one per cluster or package)
Add support for creating and destroying structures to allow a hierarchy
of resources to be created.
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Probing MPAM is convoluted. MSCs that are integrated with a CPU may
only be accessible from those CPUs, and they may not be online.
Touching the hardware early is pointless as MPAM can't be used until
the system-wide common values for num_partid and num_pmg have been
discovered.
Start with driver probe/remove and mapping the MSC.
Cc: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
