The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-52-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-51-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-49-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-38-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-48-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-47-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-46-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-45-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-44-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Acked-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-43-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-42-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-41-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-40-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-39-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-37-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-36-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-35-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-33-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-32-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-30-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-29-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-28-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-27-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-26-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-24-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-23-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-22-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-21-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-20-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-19-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-18-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-17-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-16-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-15-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-14-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
While at it, remove forward-declaration of atmel_console - it wasn't
needed even at the moment the driver was first time introduced:
commit 1e6c9c2878 ("[ARM] 3242/2: AT91RM9200 support for 2.6 (Serial)")
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
Cc: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-13-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-12-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-11-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-10-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-9-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-8-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-7-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
In contrast to 8250/8250_of, legacy_serial on powerpc does fill
(struct plat_serial8250_port). The reason is likely that it's done on
device_initcall(), not on probe. So, 8250_core is not yet probed.
Propagate value from platform_device on 8250 probe - in case powepc
legacy driver it's initialized on initcall, in case 8250_of it will be
initialized later on of_platform_serial_setup().
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-6-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit 54edb42534.
The offending commit caused serdev core to always be built-in, something
which breaks the build of dependent modules when serdev is being built
as a module:
ERROR: "__serdev_device_driver_register" [drivers/gnss/gnss-ubx.ko] undefined!
...
make[2]: *** [/home/johan/work/omicron/src/linux/scripts/Makefile.modpost:94: __modpost] Error 1
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191218131154.13702-1-johan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit 751d001733.
The wrong commit got added to the tty-next tree, the correct one is in
the tty-linus branch.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Engraf <david.engraf@sysgo.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
For the ux500v2 variant of the PL18x block, any block sizes
are supported. This is necessary to support some SDIO
transfers. This also affects the QCOM MMCI variant and the
ST micro variant.
For Ux500 an additional quirk only allowing DMA on blocks
that are a power of two is needed. This might be a bug in
the DMA engine (DMA40) or the MMCI or in the interconnect,
but the most likely is the MMCI, as transfers of these
sizes work fine for other devices using the same DMA
engine. DMA works fine also with SDIO as long as the
blocksize is a power of 2.
This patch has proven necessary for enabling SDIO for WLAN on
PostmarketOS-based Ux500 platforms.
What we managed to test in practice is Broadcom WiFi over
SDIO on the Ux500 based Samsung GT-I8190 and GT-S7710.
This WiFi chip, BCM4334 works fine after the patch.
Before this patch:
brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_alloc_request: using brcm/brcmfmac4334-sdio
for chip BCM4334/3
mmci-pl18x 80118000.sdi1_per2: unsupported block size (60 bytes)
brcmfmac: brcmf_sdiod_ramrw: membytes transfer failed
brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_download_code_file: error -22 on writing
434236 membytes at 0x00000000
brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_download_firmware: dongle image file download
failed
After this patch:
brcmfmac: brcmf_c_preinit_dcmds: Firmware: BCM4334/3 wl0:
Nov 21 2012 00:21:28 version 6.10.58.813 (B2) FWID 01-0
Bringing up networks, discovering networks with "iw dev wlan0 scan"
and connecting works fine from this point.
This patch is inspired by Ulf Hansson's patch
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg12160.html
As the DMA engines on these platforms may now get block sizes
they were not used to before, make sure to also respect if
the DMA engine says "no" to a transfer.
Make a drive-by fix for datactrl_blocksz, misspelled.
Cc: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
Cc: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191217143952.2885-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ) is not recommended for
requesting IRQ's resources, as they can be not ready yet. Using
platform_get_irq() instead is preferred for getting IRQ even if it
was not retrieved earlier.
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191215175120.3290-13-tiny.windzz@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
